No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Palms At Sebring Nursing And Rehabilitation The

725 S Pine St, Sebring, FL 33870 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (863) 385-0161 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (863) 385-0161 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0744)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
343 S Commerce Ave · (863) 382-2772 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2190 Lakeview Dr · (863) 385-0741 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
139 E Center Ave · (863) 214-4762 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1989 Lakeview Dr · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.2%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.6%4.6%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.4%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.4%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.3%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.7%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table5.0%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.7%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.152.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.761.151.80better

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
75.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.60U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.21hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.35hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 75.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 148 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 34% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.5%CMS range 45.4–56.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.6%CMS range 10.9–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge75.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified34.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting96.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge92.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.5–11.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.99
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.16
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.89 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-02-25)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2023-01-12)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide antiretroviral medication for an immunocompromised resident for one resident (# 1) out of three residents sampled.Findings included: On 1/28/2026 at 9:45 AM., an observation was made revealing Resident #1 lying in bed. He was observed alert with no signs of distress. Resident #1 stated he had issues in the past with his insurance which caused him delays in getting his medication, for which he missed some doses.Review of Resident #1 admission Record showed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to an immunocompromised Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Hyperglycemia, major depressive disorder, recurrent, unspecified. Review of Resident #1's Medication Administration Record [MAR] dated October 2025 revealed Biktarvy Oral Tablet 50-200-25 Milligram [MG], (Bictegravir Emtricitabine-Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarate) Give one tablet by mouth one time a day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-10-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented and/or resolved for the Resident Council for five months in 2025 (June, July, August, September and October 2025) out of five months reviewed.Findings included: A review of resident council minutes revealed there were multiple discussions related to residents wanting more ice water and snacks to be offered from June 2025-October 2025. An interview was conducted on 10/13/25 at 4:25 p.m. with Resident #2. The resident said she goes to the resident council meeting, and they had discussed needing water refills and wanting snacks several times, but nothing changed. Resident #2 said she occasionally had heard staff refilling water in the hall, but they didn't come to her side of the hall. Review of Resident #2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), conducted 5/29/25, revealed a score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. An interview was conducted on 10/13/25 at 4:30 p.m. with Resident #3. The resident said she attended resident council meetings. She said they still did not get more…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure three residents (#41, #167, and #168) out of three residents reviewed for beneficiary notifications were provided with the correct notification prior to changes of skilled services and related changes. Findings included: Review of the Beneficiary Notice-Residents discharged within the Last Six Months form, completed by the facility, revealed 20 residents. Three randomly selected residents were chosen for review. Resident #41 was selected and identified as remained in facility, Resident #167 was selected and identified as remained in facility, and Resident #168 was selected and identified as discharged Home. Review of Resident #41's Skilled Nursing Facility Beneficiary Notification Review form, completed by the facility, showed the following information: - Skilled Services Start Date: 1/5/24. - Last Day of Services Covered: 11/15/24. - Voluntary Discharge from Services. - Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) was provided and signed by Resident #41 on 11/15/24. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY During an interview on 2/25/25 at 5:48 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) stated the expectation is the facility mark the MDS assessments accurately. 3. Review of admission Records showed Resident #56 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus with diabetic neuropathy. Review of Resident 56's care plan showed a focus area of ADL self-care performance deficit with interventions including TRANSFER: The resident requires partial/moderate assistance by staff to move between surfaces, dated 8/13/24. Review of Resident #56's 2/7/25 Quarterly MDS, Section GG, Functional Abilities, showed for chair/bed-to-chair transfer the resident is partial/moderate assistance. An interview was conducted on 2/24/25 at 2:52 p.m. with the Director of Rehab (DOR). He said Resident #56 needed a mechanical list with maximum assistance to get out of bed and has always needed that. 4. Review of admission Records showed Resident #39 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including protein-calorie…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) were accurately completed for nine residents (#44, #55, #91, #94, #33, #39, #56, #6, and #5) out of 22 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate and muscular dystrophy. Review of a psych note dated 2/6/25 showed Resident #44 presented with major depressive disorder, recurrent, moderate, other specified anxiety disorders, primary insomnia, and muscular dystrophy. Review of the Level I PASRR, dated 1/9/25, showed in Section I, Part A. MI (Mental Illness) or suspected MI (Mental Illness) the diagnosis of Depressive Disorder was not marked. Section I, Part B Intellectual Disability (ID) or suspected ID (check all that apply) Muscular Dystrophy was not marked under Related Condition. 2. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of the comprehensive care plan for five residents (#104, #4, #56, #39, and #6) out of twenty-two residents sampled. Findings included: 1. A review of Resident #104's admission Record showed an admit date of 1/28/25 with a diagnosis of tobacco use. A review of Resident #104's care plans did not show a care plan for tobacco use. 2. Review of admission Records showed Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including morbid obesity, idiopathic gout, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of Resident #4's care plan showed a focus area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit with interventions including TRANSFER: The resident requires partial/moderate assistance by staff to move between surfaces, dated 7/24/24. An interview was conducted on 2/24/25 at 2:21 p.m. with Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). She stated Resident #4 has always needed a mechanical lift…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility did not ensure care plans were revised for five residents (#13, #10, #6, #65, and #89) out of twenty-two sampled residents. Findings included: 1. Review of admission Records showed Resident #13 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, chronic cough, and dysphagia. Review of the Dining Assistance list provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) had Resident #13 listed as cue and assist, prefers bowls. Review of Resident #13's care plan showed a focus area of ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit with interventions including, Eating: The resident is a feeder, at times feeds self, adaptive device of sippy cup and sided dishes. 2. Review of admission Records showed Resident #10 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Review of the Dining Assistance list provided by the DON had Resident #10 listed as cue and assist. Review of Resident #10's care plan showed a focus area of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to 1.) did not ensure three residents (#13, #10, and #39) were assisted with eating, 2.) did not ensure two residents (#4 and #56) were assessed for transfers and provided wheelchairs, 3.) did not ensure notification of change in condition was completed appropriately for one resident (#29), 4.) did not ensure one resident (#309) was assessed appropriately for pain, and 5.) did not ensure wound care was provided for two residents (#71 and #89) out of twenty-two sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 12:52 p.m. of Resident #13 lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated and his tray table in front of him. The resident's lunch was on the tray table and he was feeding himself. His food was placed in bowls and he had a regular cup with no lid. The resident had food spilled down the front of his shirt.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure food preferences were honored for four residents (#309, #28, #39, and #71) out of twenty-two residents sampled. Findings included: 1. On 2/22/2025 at 11:24 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #309 in his room with his family at his bedside. Resident #309 stated he requested hot tea in the morning since his arrival and so far, tea has not been offered to him. Resident #309 stated the facility continued to offer coffee when the resident dislikes coffee. He stated each time they ask him he would request hot tea instead, but no one would bring him a hot tea. The resident denied meeting any representatives from the kitchen regarding his food preferences. The resident stated, at this point, I've given up on getting a hot cup of tea in the morning. On 2/24/2025 at 9:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with the Food Service Director (FSD). The FSD stated her team will conduct a food preference interview with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure dignity was maintained for residents in one out of two dining rooms related to residents at a single table not being served meals at the same time. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 2/23/25 during lunch in the second-floor dining room. At 12:20 p.m., the first tray cart arrived in the dining room. There were 14 residents in the dining room for lunch: - At a table with two residents, the first resident was served their tray at 12:25 p.m. and the second resident was not served until 12:44 p.m. - At a table with three residents, the first two residents were served their trays at 12:34 p.m. and the third resident was not served until 12:45 p.m. - At a table with two residents, the first resident was served their tray at 12:42 p.m. After a couple of minutes, the resident was overheard asking her table mate if she minded if she went ahead and began eating. The second resident was not served until 12:46 p.m. - At 12:46 p.m., 5 of the 14 residents in the dining room were not served. - At 12:48 p.m., two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to honor resident rights to formulate advance directives for two residents (#259 and #94) of 22 residents sampled for advance directives. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 2/26/25 at 9:36 a.m., the court appointed guardian for Resident #259 stated contacting the facility on multiple occasions to inform and ascertain information related to Resident #259, including the resident being intellectually disabled since birth and not able to make decisions. The guardian also stated the hospital had the paperwork from the court and the paperwork was sent with Resident #259 upon admission to the facility. The guardian stated they verbally told the nurses and sent the court documents of the guardianship to the facility. The facility not only had him sign to papers of disenrollment of healthcare coverage, but the facility also had Resident #259 sign vaccination consents and discharge paperwork, all being a violation of the court order. Review of Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure privacy of residents' personal health information on one unit (East) out of two units in the facility. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 10:28 a.m. of a medication cart outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The computer screen was unlocked with a resident's medical record displayed. The nurse was in a resident room and people were observed moving through the halls. An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 10:44 a.m. of a lab book sitting on the top counter at the nurses' station with a resident's face sheet sticking out of the book. The book was visible to anyone walking past the nurses' station. At the time, four residents were sitting at the nurses' station and no staff were present. An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 12:10 p.m. of a second-floor medication cart sitting in a resident hall with the computer screen unlocked and a resident's medical record displayed on the screen. No staff were present and residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the prevention of the development of pressure wounds for one resident (#28) out of eight residents sampled. Findings included: On 2/22/2025 at 10:15 a.m., an observation and interview were conducted with Resident #28 and his family member in his room. Resident #28 was in bed and stated he was in a car accident and broke both his legs. Resident #28's family member stated the resident has several new open wounds on his right leg and bottom since he has been in the facility. An observation was made when Resident #28 lifted his right leg to reveal a dressing on the lateral lower area. The dressing had dried light to dark brown drainage and was dated 2/20. Resident #28's family member stated the wounds to his legs were from the brace he was wearing after his accident, but added he no longer wears the brace while he is in bed. An observation was made of two soft boots on the resident's wheelchair seat. The family member stated sometimes the staff will place the soft boots on the resident when he is in bed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility did not ensure the environment was free of possible accident hazards related to smoking materials for one resident (#104) of one resident sampled for smoking and related to razors and scissors in two resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) of thirty-one resident rooms observed. Findings included: 1. On 2/22/2025 at 12:20 p.m., an observation was made of Resident #104 in his room during the initial tour of the facility. In Resident #104's room there were two packs of cigarettes and three cigarette lighters in view. Resident #104 stated he was in the facility for therapy in hopes to discharge home. On 2/23/2025 at 9:25 a.m., an observation was made of Staff T, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) in Resident #104's room, cleaning. Resident #104 was not present in the room. The smoking materials observed the day before in Resident #104's room were no longer present. On 2/23/2025 at 12:49 p.m., an observation and interview were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not ensure post-dialysis communication was implemented and documented in the medical records for one resident (#33) of one resident sampled for dialysis. Findings included: A review of Resident #33's admission Record showed an original admit date of 7/6/2022, with a readmission date of 9/21/2024, and a diagnosis of end stage renal disease (ESRD). A review of Resident #33's February 2025 physician orders showed an order dated 2/5/2025 for dialysis weekly on: Monday/Wednesday/Friday at [dialysis center]. A review of Resident #33's dialysis communication records from 1/25/2025 to 2/21/2025 did not show a section for post-dialysis assessment or vital signs upon return to the facility. Upon further record review, no orders to address the resident's central line access for dialysis and/or documentation for post-dialysis assessment or vital signs were revealed. On 2/24/2025 at 12:00 p.m., an interview was conducted with Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) , Staff C, LPN and Staff V, Registered Nurse (RN). All three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure pharmacy recommendations were completed for two residents (#57 and #5) out of five reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: Review of admission Records showed Resident #57 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including atherosclerotic heart disease. Review of Resident #57's February 2025 physician orders showed an order for Peridex mouth/throat solution 0.12%. Give 15 ml (milliliters) by mouth every 12 hours for gum/teeth pain, dated 11/20/24 and a second order for Peridex mouth/throat solution 0.12%. Give 15 ml by mouth every 12 hours as needed for mouth pain for 2 weeks, dated 2/9/25 to 2/23/25. A review of a Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review dated 12/16/24 revealed: Peridex 0.12% (Chlorhexidine Gluconate) should not be swallowed. Please add to the order: Swish 15ml for 15-20 seconds, the expectorate- do not swallow A review of a Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review dated 2/16/25 revealed: Perdix should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility did not ensure medications were stored properly on two out of two units in the facility related to unlocked medication carts, unsecured medication, and medication in resident rooms. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 10:23 a.m. of a medication cart at the second-floor nurses' station. There were two bottles of medication sitting on top of the cart, one was a stool softener and the other a multivitamin. Both bottles contained medication. No staff were in sight of the medication cart and three residents were sitting within 10 to 15 feet of the cart. An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 10:47 a.m. of an unlocked medication cart at the first floor nurses' station. No staff were near the cart. An observation was conducted on 2/22/25 at 11:51 a.m. of an unlocked medication cart on the second floor. No staff were in sight of the medication cart and a resident was sitting approximately 5 feet away from the cart. A nurse walked back up to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement protocols from the facility's antibiotic stewardship program for one resident (#3) out of three residents reviewed for antibiotic use. Findings included: An observation and interview on 2/22/25 at 2:32 p.m. showed Resident #3 lying in bed with an Intravenous Therapy (IV) pole at the bedside. The IV pole contained two empty bags of Vancomycin, both dated 2/22/25. Resident #3 stated she was getting IV antibiotics because she recently had a severe Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) that sent her to the hospital. Resident #3 stated she did not know how long she would be on IV antibiotics but stated she was feeling much better. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #3 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to infection and inflammatory reaction due to other urinary tract infection (UTI) unspecified, urinary catheter initial encounter, infection and inflammatory reaction due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-09 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the protection of a resident's right to remain at the facility by issuing an inaccurate reason on a thirty-day Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice for one resident (#4) out of one resident reviewed for admission, transfer, and discharge. Findings included: On 01/09/2025 at 10:30 a.m., Resident #4 was observed in his room, in bed, working on his laptop. Resident #4 stated the facility was discharging him for non-payment. He stated he did not want to talk about it. On 01/09/2025 at 11:15 a.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated, one resident, Resident #4 had been provided a 30-day discharge notice on 12/05/2024. He stated the reason for the 30-day notice was that the resident was combative. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident #4 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which meant he was cognitively intact. A review of the medical record showed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by failure to discard food items that were expired, unlabeled and undated food items in the kitchen and one of two medication storage rooms, and one dietary staff member not wearing a hair net in the kitchen area. Findings Included: An observation, during the initial kitchen tour on 01/09/23 at 9:25 AM, revealed two (2) low-fat 1% gallons of milk that had an expiration of 12/28/2022. An immediate interview on 01/09/23 at 9:25 AM, Dietary Staff C confirmed the milk was expired and stated, hopefully no one used it. An observation, on 01/09/23 at 9:30 AM, revealed a handful of yellow colored hard tubular food product that was wrapped up with plastic wrap that was not labeled or dated. An immediate interview on 01/09/23 at 9:30 AM, Dietary Staff E stated, what is that and identified the food product as left-over uncooked spaghetti. Dietary Staff stated that should have been labeled and dated. An observation on 01/09/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement explicitly informed the resident or their representative of the right to not sign it for three residents (#12, #41, and #24) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #12's Face Sheet revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE]., with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease, insomnia, and depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), provided by the facility and dated 1/12/23, Section C - Cognitive Patterns revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was a 15 out of 15, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the binding arbitration agreement revealed it was signed by the facility representative (Staff G, admission Coordinator) and Resident #12 with no date documented. Further review of the binding arbitration agreement revealed the agreement did not show an explicit statement that the resident or representative did not have to sign the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-01-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide Pneumococcal vaccinations for three (Residents #4, #12, and #33) of five residents sampled for Pneumococcal vaccinations, failed to provide influenza vaccinations for three (Residents #12, 33, and 63) of five residents sampled for influenza vaccinations, and failed to provide COVID-19 vaccinations for two (Residents #33 and 63) out of five residents sampled for COVID-19 vaccinations. Findings included: A request was made for pneumococcal, flu, and COVID vaccination consent/refusal and proof of administration for five residents on 1/11/23 to Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN)/Minimum Data Set (MDS Coordinator,) who was covering in the absence of the Director of Nursing (DON.) A record review for Resident #12 indicated he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Staff B, RN provided an Authorization for Treatment for pneumococcal, flu and COVID vaccines with Resident #12's name on it. The form was not filled out or signed.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide care and services related to catheter care for one resident (#25) out of six residents with indwelling catheters. Findings included: A review of admission records revealed Resident #25 had diagnoses to include urinary tract infection, cerebral palsy, and abdominal pain. A review of Resident #25's care plan revealed a care plan for increased risk for urinary tract infection related to presence of indwelling catheter for diagnosis of urinary retention, it noted catheter was changed to suprapubic catheter on 1/25/22. Interventions included change catheter bag monthly and observe/record urine appearance. A review of physician orders revealed the following orders: 1-Cleanse suprapubic site with normal saline, pat dry, apply clotrimazole solution and cover with split 4 x 4 gauze twice daily. Order date 8/28/22. 2-Suprapubic catheter care every shift. Order date 8/28/22. A review of the electronic Treatment Administration Record (eTAR) indicated order 1 was not documented as completed on 23 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy reviews facility failed to ensure one resident (#25) out of thirty-one sampled residents received trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice and accounted for the resident's experiences and preferences in order to eliminate or mitigate triggers that may cause traumatization. Findings included: A review of Resident #25's Minimum Data Set (MDS,) section I, Active Diagnosis, dated 12/3/22, revealed a diagnosis of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD.) A review of admission records indicated Resident #25 was admitted in 2019 with diagnoses to include anxiety, personality changes due to known physiological condition, and persistent mood disorder. A review of Resident #25's care plan revealed no care plans for PTSD or trauma-informed care. On 1/12/23 at 8:28 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN,) MDS Coordinator, who is currently covering for the Director of Nursing (DON.) When asked if they have care plans for PTSD and Trauma-Informed care she stated, not at this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a resident-centered plan of care related to Dementia Care for one (#21) of one resident reviewed for dementia care out of 21 facility residents with dementia related diagnosis or Alzheimers' disease. Findings included: A record review for Resident #21 revealed admission to the facility in 2020 with diagnoses that included dementia, communication deficit and mood disorder, according to the Face sheet. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], under Section I revealed diagnoses that included Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. Review of a behavioral health note dated 10/18/2022 listed a secondary diagnosis of Dementia. Review of the resident's care plan on 01/11/2023 did not reveal a focus area related to Dementia care. During an interview on 01/11/2023 at 01:38 PM with Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN), MDS Coordinator, she stated the Social Services department was responsible for behavioral and Dementia care planning. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-04-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility file review, the facility did not ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment during four of four days observed (4/20/2021, 4/21/2021, 4/22/2021, and 4/23/2021) as evidenced by: 1) one of one smoking area observed with cigarette butts on the ground and cigarette butts in a trash can that was not fire rated, 2) seating equipment in disrepair in one (first floor) of two dining rooms, and 3) Twelve (203, 204, 206, 210, 211, 213, 216, 219, 222, 227, 230, 231) of 62 resident rooms with soiled floors, cracked and chipped tiles, unbagged plungers, and walls in disrepair. Findings included: 1. During facility-wide tours on 4/20/2021 at 10:30 a.m., 4/21/2021 at 7:30 a.m., 1:00 p.m., 4/22/2021 at 7:45 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. and 4/23/2021 at 9:00 a.m. the following was observed: The first floor dining room was observed with a door that led from the dining room into a screened in porch. The porch was identified as a smoking area for residents. The porch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of clinical records and policies and procedures, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one (#30) of 32 sampled residents related to respiratory care and behaviors and failed to implement care plan interventions related to smoking for one (#59) of 32 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. On 04/21/21 at 9:41 a.m., Resident #30 was observed lying in the bed flat on his back. The head of the bed was not elevated. The resident was sleeping. An oxygen concentrator was noted in the room running. Resident #30 was noted to have the oxygen tubing with a nasal cannula lying in the bed beside him. A review of the medical record for Resident #30 indicated the resident had a diagnosis of congestive heart failure, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. A review of the physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interviews, and policy review the facility did not ensure systems and processes for treatment of a pressure ulcer were implemented related to timely treatment of infection, appropriate disinfection of treatment supplies, maintenance of dressings on a pressure ulcer, adequate cleansing of the pressure ulcer, and appropriate application of the ordered treatment in a manner to prevent the worsening of a pressure ulcer for one resident (#40) of two residents sampled for care and services for pressure ulcers. Findings included: Resident #40 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of type II diabetes mellitus, according to the face sheet in the admission record. A review of the history and physical from the hospital, dated 11/4/20, reflected a chief complaint of pressure sore on coccyx. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 03/03/21, section H, bladder and bowel, revealed Resident #40 was always incontinent of urine and bowel. Review of Section M, skin conditions, reflected a stage 4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure a root cause analysis and meaningful interventions were implemented to prevent accidents for one (#8) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings included: Resident #8 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of dementia and history of falling, according to the face sheet in the admission record. Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 3, indicating Resident #8 had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the 72 hour charting/report reflected Resident #8 was transferring herself from bed to wheelchair and her leg gave out and fell to her bottom on 4/3/21. A review of the facility documentation for Resident #8 reflected she had fallen on the following dates: 12/11/20 1/9/21 1/16/21 2/28/21 3/3/21 4/3/21 Review of the care plan dated 10/28/20 revealed no new interventions following the 4/3/21 fall had been implemented. A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care and services, related to proper storage of a nebulizer machine and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatments, consistent with professional standards of practice for one (Resident #30) of one resident investigated for respiratory care. Findings included: A review of the medical record for Resident #30 indicated the resident had a diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #30 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. A review of the physician orders indicated the following active orders: Atrovent administer one vial via nebulizer every six hours for shortness of breath or wheezing; auto CPAP 5-15 sonometers with heated humidification (dated 4/12/21). A review of the provider progress notes for Resident #30 indicated the following: -a visit dated 4/7/21 noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility did not ensure appropriately stored refrigerated controlled substances in two of two medication refrigerators in two of two medication storage rooms on two of two nursing units (the first and second floors). Findings included: On 4/20/21 at 10:13 AM an observation was conducted on the second floor in the medication storage room with Staff A, LPN. The medication refrigerator contained a locked controlled substance box on the top shelf that was not secured to the refrigerator. Photographic evidence obtained. During the observation an interview was conducted with Staff A, LPN who said she was not aware it needed to be secured to the refrigerator. On 4/22/21 at 8:46 AM an observation was conducted in the medication room on the first floor with Staff K, RN (registered nurse). The locked controlled substance box was sitting on a shelf in the refrigerator, unsecured. Staff K, RN removed the locked box from the refrigerator and placed it on the counter. She unlocked it and opened it and removed a bottle of lorazepam 2 mg/ml. Staff K, RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility did not ensure two (#282, #17) of two sampled hospice residents had a record of the benefit of election for hospice and a hospice plan of care or indication of hospice personnel involved in hospice care and working in collaboration with the facility. Findings included: During multiple facility tours throughout the survey, Resident #282, a hospice resident was observed laying in bed, appeared to be resting. A review of Resident # 282's clinical record revealed an admission date of 03/30/21 with diagnoses to include: unspecified systolic (heart failure), acute encephalopathy, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, unspecified dementia, essential hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, heart disease, unspecified atrial fibrillation, dehydration, history of dementia and hypothyroid. Continued review of the record revealed no hospice physician consult order, no benefit of election, no plan of care for hospice or indication of hospice personnel…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PINE STREET HEATHCARE HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 06/18/2024
HCFL HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/18/2024
SEBRING HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/18/2024
FOLLMAN, BERELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2024
KURLAND, BENJAMINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/18/2024
LEFKOWITZ, MICHAELIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 06/01/2024
SEBRING SNF PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2024
MONTSDEOCA, GARYIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/18/2024
SPADOLA, JAMESIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/19/2024
FRIEDMAN, BRIANIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2024
RAJCHENBACH, AVRUMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2024
RAJCHENBACH, RIVKAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2024
SHABAT, AHUVAIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 06/17/2024
CASCADE CAPITAL HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
CASCADE CAPITAL PARTNERS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
CASCASIS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
CCG FUTUNA LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
DOROS GENERATION TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
GPN FAMILY TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
HANCOCK INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
SPIDER REALTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
VICTORIA INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
GURWITZ, SOLOMONIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/09/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-33.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$682K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 14%Other / private 26%

This home reported $682K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$510per resident / day
operating cost
$15,513per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$382per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105037. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-02-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next