Stuart Rehabilitation And Healthcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 236 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 32.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 99 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.00 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.83 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.14 to 0.67 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

15 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 5 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined, the facility failed to appropriately assess 1 of 2 sampled residents experiencing changes in condition, Resident #1, as evidenced by the lack of monitoring signs and symptoms of a bowel obstruction, that included vomiting, diarrhea, bradycardia / tachycardia and fever. The findings included: Clinical record review conducted on 04/10/25 revealed Resident #1 has been a long-term care resident at the facility since 08/29/22. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment, with reference date 01/16/25, documents Resident #1 was assessed as severely impaired for skills of daily decision making; is always incontinent of bladder and bowel; has active diagnoses of dementia; and is dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). Revie of the Care plan titled, At risk for constipation related to decrease self-mobility, last revised 01/22/25, documents interventions as: observe for and report to medical doctor complications related to constipation: change in mental status, new onset confusion, sleepiness, inability…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 of 17 newly admitted sampled residents, Resident #202 and Resident #71. The findings included: 1. Record review documented Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Parkinsonism, Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy, Alzheimer's Disease, and Dementia. A review of Resident #71's electronic health record (EHR) contained no evidence of a Baseline Care Plan completed within 48 hours of Resident #71's admission. 2. Record review documented Resident #202 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Dementia, Frontotemporal neurocognitive Disorder, and Anxiety. A review of Resident #202's EHR contained no evidence of a Baseline Care Plan completed within 48 hours of Resident #71's admission. On 05/22/24 at 1:50 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked where the Baseline Care Plans could be found within the electronic health…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were invited to participate in care plan meetings for 1 of 19 sampled residents reviewed, Resident #61. The findings included: On 05/20/24 at 12:50 PM, and interview was conducted with Resident #61, The resident was asked if she attends her care plan meetings. She stated she didn't know what I was talking about and had never been to a care plan meeting. Review of Resident #61's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of her quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating an intact cognition. A review of the resident's Care Plan meetings document showed the facility has had a care plan meeting every 3 months. The document showed who attended the care plan meetings that included the resident's son attending the care plan meetings via telephone. There is only one date of 07/27/23, when the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services for 3 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by staff failed to store and change oxygen and nebulizer (a device for administering a medication by spraying a fine mist) tubing for Resident #36; failed to remain with Resident #36 during a nebulizer treatment, then failed to complete a post treatment assessment as per policy; failed to assess Resident #306 before and after a nebulizer treatment; and failed to obtain a physician order for oxygen use for Resident #9. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Administering Medications through a Small Volume (Handheld) Nebulizer, revised October 2010, documented, in part, the process for preparing and setting up the nebulizer for administration of a medication, followed by, . 6. Obtain baseline pulse, respiratory rate and lung sounds. 17. Remain with the resident for the treatment. 26. Obtain post-treatment pulse, respiratory rate and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate labeling of medications for 2 of 8 sampled residents, Resident #5 and #9, who had medication ordered for bedtime, with a change in scheduled administration time, and failed to identify the change on the medication packaging. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Medication Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy, dated May 2022 documented, in part, Policy: Medication are labeled in accordance with facility requirements and state and federal laws. Only the dispensing pharmacy / registered pharmacist can modify, change, or attach prescription labels. Procedures: . G. Medication labels are not altered, modified, or marked in any way by nursing personnel. 1) If the physician's directions for use change or the label is inaccurate, the nurse may place a change of order - check chart label on the container indicating there is a change in directions for use, taking care not to cover important label information. 2) When such a label appears on the container, the medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to document when showers or bed baths were provided for 3 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #49, #252 and #61. This has the potential to affect all residents related to system documentation. The census at the time of survey was 108. The findings Included: Review of the Policy and Procedure for shower/tub baths documented, in part, under Documentation, the following: The following information should be recorded on the resident's ADL [Activities of Daily Living] record and/or in the resident's medical record: 1. The date and time of the shower/tub was performed 2. The name and title of the individual who assisted the resident with the shower/tub bath 3. All assessment data (e.g. any reddened areas, sores, etc on the resident's skin) obtained during the shower/tub bath 4. How the resident tolerate3d the shower/tub bath 5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reason why the intervention taken 6. The signature and title of the person recording the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and policy review, staff failed to wear Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) during direct care for 1 of 1 sampled resident who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs), as evidenced by Resident #21 had an indwelling urinary catheter and Staff E, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), provided care and failed to don PPE. The facility also failed to ensure hand hygiene between residents during two observed meals on 1 of 4 units (100 Unit), that affected Residents #62, #5, and #35. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, MDRO'S [multidrug-resistant organisms] and Enhanced Barrier Precautions [EBP], (not dated), documented, in part: Enhanced Barrier Precautions require the use of gowns and gloves only for high-contact resident care activities (unless otherwise indicated as part of Standard Precautions). With EBP, the use of PPE is expanded for everyone's protection. Staff are required to use gowns and gloves during high-contact resident care activities that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff followed the facility protocol regarding unavailable medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents reviewed for medications, resulting in the resident not receiving physician-ordered medications as prescribed (Resident #72). The findings included: A review of the facility's policy regarding Medication Errors (Reference #6084) documents: Definition: A Medication Error is any preventable event that may cause or lead to inappropriate medication use or resident harm . Types of medication errors include: Omission (not administered before next scheduled dose due . Procedure: When a medication error occurs, the following shall occur in this order: Notify the physician and evaluate the resident. Notify resident/responsible party. Perform any necessary clinical interventions, within the resident care provider's scope of practice to reduce negative effects of the identified error. Record the medication as given in the medical record if applicable. Record the observed and assessed outcome of the resident in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper indwelling urinary catheter care and services for 3 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced failure to maintain Resident #81's urinary catheter tubing and drainage bag off the floor and failure to ensure proper urinary catheter anchoring for Residents #24, #43, and #81. All three residents had a history of Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs). The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Indwelling Urinary Catheter Insertion and Maintenance - Female Resident, revised 10/2017, documented the process for placing the catheter followed by the instructions to keep the collection bag below the level of the bladder at all times, but do not rest the bag on the floor. This policy further instructed the staff to apply a catheter strap to the leg to prevent it from pulling. The Director of Nursing (DON) was unable to locate a policy that included these directions for the male resident but agreed it would be applicable to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop care plans to accurately reflect their Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) status for 1 of 22 sampled residents, Resident #42, reviewed for DNR status. The findings included: On 12/01/21 at 10:54 AM, record review for Resident #42 revealed a physician order, dated 05/26/21, for Advanced Directives that indicated - 'Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)'. Further review of Resident #42's records lacked evidence of a care plan to reflect the DNR status. On 12/01/21 at 11:43 AM, an interview was held with the Social Worker (SW). She reviewed Resident #42's records in the presence of the surveyor and revealed she could not find a care plan for the DNR. The SW then confirmed that there was no care plan but that there should have been a care plan for DNR status. After surveyor intervention, she voiced she would generate a DNR care plan today (12/01/21).

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL