Sunrise Health & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 345 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 401 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.63 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 90% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 237 beds and averages 220.7 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.25 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.52 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.33 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.18 to 0.91 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This was observed during 2 of 2 visits conducted in the Main Kitchen. The findings included: On 02/23/26 at 8:47 AM, a tour of the facility's kitchen was conducted. Upon entering the kitchen, several male staff were observed with facial hair, none of which were wearing beard covers (Staff V, W, X, Y). Once the staff were alerted by the surveyor, Staff X donned a beard cover but did not cover his mustache. The surveyor had to explain to all the male staff that beard covers were to cover all facial hair, not just beards. The following was also observed: a. Two plates in the plate warmer were found to have food particles and the food contact surface of the plates showed signs of wear and excessive use. b. Two 50-ounce cans of Tomato Soup were noted with dents on the bottom of the cans in the dry stock room. c. The dishwashing machine was a high temperature model. During the observation, it was run 3 times, but it did…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to correctly complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for 2 of 35 sampled residents, Resident #54 and Resident #98. The findings included:1. Record review revealed Resident #54 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], under Section C revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section P-Restraints and Alarms of the same MDS revealed the MDS was coded as the resident using Bed Rails. An interview was conducted with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), MDS Coordinator on 02/24/26 at 10:56 AM. She stated it was an error as they do not use restraints. 2. Record review revealed Resident #98 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide splints / protectors to assist in preventing contractures for 1 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for position and mobility, Resident #15. The findings included: Record review revealed Resident #15 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, depression, and right-hand contracture. The [NAME] Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident #15's cognitive status to be severely impaired. A review of the physician's orders showed a Bilateral hand palm protector order every shift for skin integrity, dated 12/17/25. Review of the care plan dated 01/16/26 revealed contracture prevention and management, including split-type palm protectors for bilateral hands, refer to therapy as needed, and apply splints and remove them as scheduled. Review of the Occupational Therapy Evaluation and plan of treatment dated 12/12/25 revealed Resident #15 presents with Bilateral upper extremity hand contractures and recommended the use…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-26 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to address weight loss in a timely manner and provide nutritional interventions for 3 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for nutrition, Resident #193, Resident #7, and Resident #59. The findings included: 1. Record review showed Resident #193 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Anemia and Depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #193 has a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 08, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In an interview conducted on 02/24/26 at 9:10 AM with Resident #193, he stated that he was in so much pain and could not eat his breakfast. Closer observation showed that the breakfast meal was untouched. In an interview conducted on 02/24/26 at 11:39 AM, Resident #193 was in the room with his lunch, consisting of marinated pork cubes, fluffy rice, carrots, and vanilla ice cream. Resident #193 stated that he is not very hungry, but he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of policy and procedure, observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services and change the dressings for residents' Midline Intravenous (IV) catheter dressing in a timely manner, for 1 of 1 sampled resident observed, on the Locked Memory Care, G-wing, with a Midline catheter in place, Resident #23.The findings included:Review of the facility policy title, Midline.Dressing Change, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON), revised on 01/2026 documented in the Policy Statement: It is the policy of this facility to change.Midline.dressing weekly, or if soiled, in a manner to decrease potential for infection and/or cross-contamination. Physician's orders will specify type of dressing and frequency of changes. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: g. Open sterile dressing kit.6. Inspect the catheter-skin junction and surrounding area, palpating through the intact dressing for redness, tenderness, swelling and drainage. Be attentive to any reports of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and policy review, the facility failed to follow physicians' oxygen orders for 4 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for oxygen therapy and has the potential to affect 49 residents on oxygen therapy, Resident #38, Resident #229, Resident #108, Resident #228; failed to obtain physicians order for oxygen therapy administration for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for oxygen therapy, Resident #49; and failed to follow the professional standards of practice during medication administration via an oral inhalation for 1 of 8 sampled residents for medication administration observation, Resident #54. The findings included:Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, provided by the Director of Nursing (DON) revised in 01/26, documented in the Policy Statement: To administer Oxygen when insufficient Oxygen is carried by the blood to the tissue.Procedure:.Place signs Oxygen in use and No Smoking signs outside room.Adjust rate of flow according to doctor's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure communication sheets were filled out accurately and completely for 2 of 3 sampled residents reviewed for dialysis, Resident #59 and Resident 105. The findings included: Review of the policy, titled, Weight Monitoring, dated 09/01/22, documented, weights should be recorded at the time obtained. Review of the facility's contract with an outside dialysis company, effective 02/14/25, page 6, documented, communication between the Facility and the Dialysis Center was via a communication form that must contain the most recent vital signs and current weights. The Dialysis Center was to enter the total amount of fluid removed. Review of the communication form revealed a notation stating the floor nurse was to report post weight promptly to dialysis. 1. Record review revealed Resident #59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The following diagnoses were included: Diabetes, End Stage Renal Disease on Dialysis,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to document the code status in the physician's orders for 1 of 35 sampled residents, Resident #6. The findings included:Review of the facility's policy titled, Communication of Code Status, date implemented 4/2022 and date revised 1/2025, revealed When an order is written pertaining to a resident's presence or absence of an Advance Directive, the directions will be clearly documented in designated sections of the medical records. Examples of directions to be documented include, but are not limited to:a. Full Codeb. Do Not Resuscitatec. Do Not Intubated. Do Not HospitalizeThe designated sections of the medical record are: Order Section of Point Click Care.On 02/24/26 at 10:22 AM a review was conducted of the Physician Orders for Resident # 6. The orders did not reveal a code status order.On 02/25/26 at 9:50 AM an interview was conducted with Staff A, a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Unit Manager. She stated to find the code status they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-26 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain residents' call lights in a working manner for 2 of 35 residents in the final sample, Residents #112 and 225. The findings included:1. Record review revealed that Resident #112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 02/02/26, Resident #112 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 09, indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. The assessment documented that the resident required partial/moderate assistance for transfers and was able to walk short distances independently and up to 150 feet with assistance and was frequently incontinent of bowel and blader. Resident #112's diagnoses at the time of the assessment included: Anemia, Hypertension, Heart failure, Renal insufficiency, DM, Hyperlipidemia, Hip fracture, Malnutrition, Chronic lung disease, refractory anemia, Pulmonary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. Resident #162 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of protein-calorie malnutrition, Type 2 diabetes, and muscle weakness. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. In an observation conducted on 08/05/24 at 6:25 PM, Resident #162 received her dinner tray, which was placed at the side table. At 6:55 PM (30 minutes later), Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant, was noted standing over the Resident feeding her the dinner soup. A chair was noted near Staff C, which had enough space to pull the chair near Resident #162's bed. Staff C stopped when this Surveyor walked into the room and said, She is a feeder, in front of Resident #162. In an interview conducted on 08/07/24 at 3:40 PM, Staff H, a Certified Nursing Assistant, stated that she was educated on treating the residents with dignity while assisting with dining. She needs to make sure that she sits near the residents at eye level while feeding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MICHAEL FEIST — 7 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $6.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL