Blue Palms Health And Rehabilitation Center At Fle
4100 E Fletcher Ave, Tampa, FL 33613 · Non profit - Church related · 163 certified beds · (813) 632-2455 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $16,801 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.6% | 8.7% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 14.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 0.3% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.3% | 0.7% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.8% | 4.6% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.1% | 2.5% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.8% | 9.5% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.8% | 14.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 99.2% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.3% | 4.5% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 11.8% | 10.5% | 21.2% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 1.8% | 8.6% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.0% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.5% | 94.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 35.9% | 26.1% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.8% | 9.1% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.48 | 2.13 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.88 | 1.15 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 195 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 63 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.2%CMS range 53.1–66.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 13.6%CMS range 10.6–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 5.9%CMS range 3.7–9.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 163 beds and averages 125.1 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.49 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.22 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.60 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.52 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent an unwitnessed fall that resulted in serious bodily injury (nondisplaced fracture of second cervical vertebra) as a result of an over inflated air mattress that was not monitored by staff for one dependent resident (#44) out of the sampled two residents. Findings included: On 04/08/24 at 11:15 a.m. Resident #44 was observed in bed with a cervical collar around her neck. During an attempt to interview her, the resident did not speak. On 04/10/24 at 9:12 a.m. Resident #44 was observed in bed with a cervical collar around her neck. Fall mats were observed on both sides of the bed on the floor. A review of the Transfer/Discharge Report showed Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include nondisplaced fracture of second cervical vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, bipolar disorder, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to respond to grievances appropriately for two residents (#12 and #13) out of three residents reviewed for grievances.Findings included:1.On 03/17/2026 at 10:15 a.m. an interview was conducted with the SSD (Social Services Director) about grievances. SSD stated that the residents could obtain the grievance forms from the pamphlet holder outside of the social services room. Once completed, they would give SSD the grievance form who would make copies and discuss the grievances in morning meetings. According to the area of concern the SSD would give the grievance to that department to investigate and resolve. This process would take three to five days. If the grievance was not resolved in three days, SSD would follow up. Another way residents could file grievances was during angel rounds where department heads would address resident's concerns.Review of a Resident admission Record dated 03/18/2026 showed Resident #12 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to implement their current written policy on resident abuse as it related to annual abuse, neglect, and exploitation training for 2 (Staff B and Staff C) of 6 staff members reviewed. Findings included: During staff record review it was determined that Staff B was hired on 10/2/2001 and last completed abuse training on 9/6/22. It was also determined that Staff C was hired on 10/5/22 and last completed abuse training on 10/5/22, which exceeded the annual training requirement. An interview with the Human Resources Manager on 06/19/2024 at 11:55 a.m. confirmed there was no written evidence that Staff B and C had completed annual abuse training as required. She further confirmed at that time the facility did not have an effective system in place to ensure that annual abuse training was completed as required. The facility abuse policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, dated 10/17/22, page 3 of 5, showed under Section II - EMPLOYEE TRAINING - B. Existing staff will receive annual education through planned in -services and as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with residents and facility staff, and review of the facility's records and policies, the facility failed to provide sufficient staff to provide meal assistance on one floor (second floor) of two floors for six (#32, #15, #30, #3, #18 and #54) of 17 dependent residents, and failed to respond to a call light for Resident #20 for two days (04/09/2024 and 04/10/2024) of a three day survey. Findings included: An observation on 04/09/24 of the lunch meal service revealed the residents in the dining room received their trays starting at 11:34 a.m. Resident #32 was the last one to receive her tray in her room at 12:45 p.m., having waited approximately one hour and twenty minutes. During a facility tour on 04/09/24 at 11:43 a.m. an observation was made of staff distributing trays on the facility's second floor dining room. The residents who eat in their rooms were observed waiting for their trays. An observation was made of Staff R, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) on 04/09/24 at 12:25…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective infection prevention and control program related to: 1) failing to ensure a contact precautions sign was displayed timely for one resident (#24) diagnosed with Clostridioides difficile (C-Diff), 2) failing to ensure proper usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) by staff and volunteers (I, Q, R, V, and Dog Handler), 3) failing to ensure four staff members (Staff Q, B, C, Director of Nursing) performed hand hygiene, and 4) failing to ensure staff provided hand hygiene for 14 residents (#54, #19, #3, #1, #36, #670, #23, #10, #2, #53, #37, #17, #57, and #33) prior to dining for three days of a three day survey. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 4/8/24 at 10:15 a.m. of Resident #24 in bed with no precaution sign on his door. Throughout the day on 4/8/24 staff were observed entering and exiting the room without donning and doffing PPE. Review of Resident #24's progress notes showed a note from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a change in condition was addressed for one resident (#51) of a total sample of 46 residents. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebral infarction, unspecified, unspecified atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, and need for assistance with personal care. On 04/10/24 at 8:31 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #51. She stated she did not feel well and did not know what was wrong with her. She said, I don't feel well. I feel like crawling out of my skin. The resident stated she has been having this feeling for a long time. She stated she notified the staff and her POA (power of attorney). She stated she was not sure what was being done about it. On 04/09/24 at 12:11 p.m., an interview was conducted with Resident #51's POA. She stated she noticed the resident had declined. She used to be in the front side of the building, they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure four resident rooms (212, 216, 217 and 218) were maintained in a clean and sanitary for one of two floors. Findings included: During a tour of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 04/08/24 at 10:16 a.m., an observation was made of the resident's bathroom with dirt and dust on the floor corners. The floors and bathroom walls were stained with brown and dark matter and the toilet was observed with brown stains around the base. A plastic storage bin under the toilet was observed with dust on the surface. The resident in the window bed stated the cleaning could be better. She stated she had seen a cockroach in the bathroom. She stated the toilet was always dirty. She stated they had a nice housekeeping staff member who was no longer there. She stated it had not been the same. An observation of the resident's drinking cup was made with a small insect on the drinking straw. The resident stated she had observed the insects in her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of the policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure an unwitnessed fall that resulted in serious bodily injury (nondisplaced fracture of second cervical vertebra) was reported to the appropriate agencies for one resident (#44) out of the sampled two residents. Findings included: On 04/08/24 at 11:15 a.m. Resident #44 was observed in bed with a cervical collar around her neck. During an attempt to interview her, the resident did not speak. On 04/10/24 at 9:12 a.m. Resident #44 was observed in bed with a cervical collar around her neck. Fall mats were observed on both sides of the bed on the floor. A review of the Transfer/Discharge Report showed Resident #44 was admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses to include nondisplaced fracture of second cervical vertebra, subsequent encounter for fracture with routine healing, bipolar disorder, dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety disorder, contracture of the muscle, history of falling,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement care plan for two residents (#23 and #670) out of 25 sampled residents. Findings included: 1. An observation was conducted on 4/8/24 at 12:05 p.m. of Resident #23 in the dining room. The resident was asked about her lunch, and she stated she didn't have hearing aids and could not hear. An interview was conducted on 4/8/24 at 2:05 p.m. with Resident #23's family member. He said the resident had hearing aids that had been lost. He was upset Resident #23 was unable to hear him and communicate. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease, and dementia. Review of an Audiology Testing report, dated 7/6/23, showed Resident #23 had severe-profound sloping hearing loss on the left and right side. Recommendations showed the resident could benefit from amplification in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to provide Activities Of Daily Living (ADLs) for two residents (#122 and #123) of five residents sampled for ADL care related to personal hygiene. Findings included: 1. An observation of Resident #122 on 04/08/24 at 10:09 a.m. revealed the resident sitting up in her bed watching television. The resident was observed to have strands of white facial hair on her chin. Interview with Resident #122 at this time revealed she does not like the hair on her chin and that she would like the facial hair to be gone. An observation of Resident #122 on 04/09/24 at 8:54 a.m. revealed the resident sitting in bed. The resident was observed to still have white strands hair on her chin. An interview with the resident at this time revealed she prefers to have her face clear with no facial hair. The resident reported the staff have helped her get washed up, but no one has asked or offered her assistance with the hair on her chin. Review of Resident #122's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure failed to ensure an order was in place for pressure relieving boots being utilized for one resident (#670) of three residents reviewed for post fall intervention and 2) failed to follow-up on an order for a swallow test for one resident (#43) of a total sample of 46 residents. Findings included: 1. An observation was made on 04/08/24 at 10:08 a.m. of Resident #670 in bed lying down with pressure-relieving boots on both feet. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) The resident stated she cannot get out of the bed because staff are keeping the pressure-relieving boots on her feet. Review of admission Records showed Resident #670 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including severe protein-calorie malnutrition, muscle wasting and atrophy, edema, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #670's Skin Observation Tool, dated 02/20/24, showed the resident had bilateral purple boots for pressure relief of heels. Review of Resident #670's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice related to oxygen therapy for one resident (#21) of two residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings included: An observation on 04/08/24 at 9:55 a.m. revealed Resident #21 was receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula, the oxygen concentrator was set at two liters per minute. The oxygen tubing was touching the floor and the storage bag was dated 04/01/2024. An observation on 04/08/2024 at 2:00 p.m. revealed Resident #21 in bed and oxygen was in place. An observation on 04/09/2024 at 8:00 a.m. revealed Resident #21 in bed, oral care had been provided and oxygen tubing was removed off the floor, the bag and tubing had been changed and dated 04/08/2024. An observation on 04/10/2024 8:00 a.m. revealed Resident #21 resting in bed receiving oxygen via a nasal cannula at two liters per minute. Review of admission Record for Resident #21 revealed a date of admission as 9/4/2020. The diagnoses included cerebral infarction, shortness of breath, anxiety,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to appropriately store and secure medications related to one (1st floor) of two units for medication at the bedside and one (200 hall, cart 1) of four medication carts left unlocked. Findings included: 1. Observation of Resident #120's room on 04/08/24 at 10:28 a.m. revealed there was a white cream in a medicine cup in a tissue box on the resident's over bed table which was located to the right side of the resident's bed. The cup was not labeled with the name of the substance and there was no indication for the direction of the use of the substance. Interview with the resident at this time revealed the resident indicated that is icy hot from last night. Also noted in the tissue box was a bottle of eye drops and a container of Icy Hot. There was no direction for use of the eyedrops or the Icy Hot. Resident #120 said, Those are mine that I paid for because my eyes get dry. Continued observation of Resident #120's room revealed a green substance in a disposable 4 oz (ounce) juice cup with a vinyl glove covered over…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the binding arbitration agreement explicitly informed the resident or their representative of the right to not sign it for three residents (#6, #120, and #122) of three residents sampled. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record for Resident #6 revealed an admission date of 03/21/2024. Resident #6 was noted as her own responsible party. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident #6 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 04/10/2024 at 10:45 a.m. an interview was conducted with Resident #6. Resident #6 stated she signed so many forms when she was admitted that she does not remember each one. Upon review of the Arbitration Agreement she signed on 04/05/2024, she stated she remembered signing the Arbitration Agreement. She was not aware the Arbitration Agreement was optional, and she was giving up her right to seek legal action. She stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolatedMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program related to small flying insects observed in three resident rooms (212, 216, and 218) on one of two floors. Findings included: During a tour of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 04/08/24 at 10:16 a.m. an observation was made of small flying insects on the resident's water cup. The resident in the window bed stated the cleaning could be better. She stated she had seen a cockroach in the bathroom. The resident stated she had observed the insects in her room before. On 04/09/24 at 11:10 a.m. an interview was conducted with Staff P, Housekeeping. She stated she cleaned all the rooms. She stated if there were bugs anywhere, she would notify her supervisor. During a tour of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] on 04/09/24 at 11:17 a.m., two urinals were observed on the resident's head of bed, hooked to the bedside rail. They were observed with urine, stained and with a foul order. An observation was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-11-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure, six residents (#25, #34, #69, #75, #87 and #99) and a representative for one resident (#40) were invited and/or participated in their plan of care meetings out a total of 43 sampled residents. Findings included: The policy, Resident/Family Participation in Goal Planning, revised 11/2016, indicated, To assure the residents and resident representative's right to participate in planning the resident's care in making informed decisions regarding medical treatment. The procedure identified the following: - 1. A resident has the right to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care, including requirements that affect both the initial planning process and changes to the plan of care. - 3. Residents and their families or other resident representatives will be given the opportunity to attend an interdisciplinary goal planning conference to participate in resident care planning and medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-11-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe and homelike environment related to wall baseboard bumpers, handrails, and a resident wall being in disrepair were reported to maintenance staff within a timely manner for repair on one floor (first floor) of two floors . Findings included: An initial tour of the facility on 11/02/2021 at 12:15 p.m. revealed various locations throughout the facility's first-floor hallways with the wall baseboard bumpers, located approximately one foot from the ground, detaching and sticking out from the wall. During these observations handrails were observed throughout the first-floor hallways in disrepair with the internal metal exposed. (Photographic Evidence Obtained) These locations and observations included: 1. The wall bottom bumper located on the right side of room [ROOM NUMBER]. 2. The wall bottom bumper located on the right side of room [ROOM NUMBER] next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. 3. The handrail on the left side of room [ROOM NUMBER].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adhere to their grievance policy for one resident (#26) of 43 sampled residents. Findings included: An interview with Resident #26 on 11/02/21 at 10:40 a.m. revealed the facility was short staffed to the point where he was left to sit in his own bowel movement for 4 hours. He reported this happened two nights ago (Sunday 10/31/21), when they were short staffed and he used his call light and no one responded on the 3:00 p.m. -11:00 p.m. shift. He reported it wasn't until 1:00 a.m. when a temporary staff person came into his room and assisted him. He reported that he reported this to the nurse, who ended up quitting that same day. Review of Resident #26's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction affecting left dominant side. Review of the resident's Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) dated 8/12/21 revealed a score of 15 (cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to provide for dependent residents appropriate nail care for one resident (#13) of 43 sampled residents. Findings included: Observations on 11/02/21 at 11:54 a.m. of Resident #13 revealed the resident lying in his bed. It was noted that the resident had a contracture to his right hand with his nails elongated approximately half an inch past the top of his finger. Observations on 11/04/21 at 10:48 a.m. revealed the resident lying in bed with his eyes open. The resident was noted with a contracture to his right hand with his nails on the right hand elongated and approximately half an inch past the top of his finger. An interview on 11/04/21 at 10:58 a.m. with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), revealed that the CNAs do nail care which would include cutting the resident nails whenever necessary. She reported the aides are to check and cut resident nails if needed on the resident's shower days. At this time Staff H checked a white erase…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-11-05 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure that pharmacy recommendations were followed for one resident (#41) out of 5 residents sampled for unnecessary medications, related to the change in dosage for Aspirin from 325 mg (milligrams) to 81 mg recommended by the consultant pharmacist on 08/03/21. Findings included: Review of Resident #41's consultant pharmacist's medication regimen review (MRR) revealed the resident had a recommendation dated 08/03/21 to reduce the resident's aspirin dosage from 325 mg to 81 mg to avoid increased risk of bleeding. In an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/04/21 on 8:55 a.m. she said that she had only been in her position since 10/01/21 and was not the DON when the recommendation was made. She said she didn't realize the recommendations hadn't been done before 11/03/21, so she did them at that time. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for diagnoses that included sepsis, presence of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-11-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-nine medication administration opportunities were observed and six errors were identified for five (#21, #20, #85, #25, and #37) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 20.69% medication error rate. Findings included: 1. On 11/3/21 at 4:32 p.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) and Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #21. Staff A was observed administering the following medications: - Eliquis 5 milligram (mg) oral tablet - Carvedilol 25 mg oral tablet - Gabapentin 300 mg oral capsule - Timolol Maleate 0.5% eye drops - Novolog 100 unit/milliliter (u/mL) FlexPen 2 units injected. During the oral administration of medication Staff A obtained a blood glucose level of 186 from Resident #21. The observation continued as Staff A removed a Novolog 100 unit/milliliter (u/mL) from the medication cart. The staff member dialed the dosage selector to 2 units and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2020-02-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, and distribute, serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to maintain the kitchen in a sanitary condition. Findings included: On 02/17/2020 starting at 9:15 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Operations Manager and the Corporate Food Service Director. An excessive amount of dust was observed on the ceiling vent above the ice machine. Black buildup was observed on the ceiling vent in the area between the stove and walk in cooler. The ceiling tiles near the cooking and food prep area were observed to have an excessive amount of food splatter and dust (photographic evidence obtained). Water damage was observed on the ceiling tile right above the food serving area. The Operations Manager reported that the ceilings were cleaned every couple of months. There was a missing vent above the tilt skillet and the third vent was ajar (photographic evidence obtained). The Operations Manager that they had a work order in for the vents.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interviews it was determined that the facility did not ensure that twelve (#56, #73, #104, #130, #140, #148, #208, #211, #212, #213, #406, and #407) of 58 residents were treated with respect and dignity related to lack of clothing for two residents (#208 and #213); reused non- skid socks for two residents (# 211 and # 212); identifying information in ID bands for two residents (#148 and #56); timely assistance with meals for one resident (#104); providing care and speaking to residents in a rushed manner for five residents (#130, #140, #407, #406, and #73), and staff talking on phones and to each other in patient care areas in a foreign language and during patient care. Findings included: 1. A review of the Face Sheet indicated that Resident #130 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis, Mood Disorder due to Major Depressive like episodes, Major Depressive Disorder. Resident #130's most recent comprehensive minimum date set (MDS) dated [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-20 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing was maintained to provide necessary care and services to the residents. Findings included: 1. On 2/18/20 at 9:01 a.m., Resident #315 reported insufficient number of staff at night, during mealtimes, and between shifts. The resident identified the need to be assisted to ambulate to the restroom, and sometimes the need to use the restroom was urgent with a capital U. Resident #315 described staff ignoring the call light or stick head in and being informed of having to wait due to staff being busy, I'm busy. On 2/19/20 at 6:46 a.m., Staff Member X, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated the facility generally replaces staff call-offs, short-staffing happens, and the facility have implemented more agency staff. Staff Member X reported feeling rushed and not being able to get the work done when staffing was short. At 7:05 a.m. on 2/19/20, Staff Member Y, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated the facility was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2020-02-20 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication regimen was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for five of six sampled residents. Three residents (#118, #130 and #36) lacked behavior monitoring and two residents (#104 and #50) lacked the rationale for the use of as needed psychotropic medications for over 14 days. Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/17/20 at 11:10 a.m. Resident #36 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Her call light was within reach. She became upset during the interview and the interview was halted. The surveyor thanked the resident for her time and excused herself. Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to depression and Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA). The physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January and February showed: Zoloft (Sertraline) 100 mg tablet (100 mg) tablet every day starting 08/13/19 and discontinue on 01/23/20 for depression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored in an orderly manner in one medication cart (2nd floor #1), and medications with a shortened open life were dated as opened in two medication carts (West 2 and [NAME] 3) out of three medication carts reviewed, and two of two refrigerated narcotic storage boxes were permanently affixed to the refrigerator. Findings included: An observation was conducted, on 2/18/20 at 11:06 a.m., with Staff Member L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) of the 2nd Floor #1 medication cart. The blister packaged medications was divided in the drawers by separators labeled with room numbers and bed letters. In the area designated as 213A were blister packages containing medications prescribed to two different residents, both residing in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The staff member confirmed the area for 213A contained medications for two different residents. On 2/19/20 at 7:20 a.m., an observation of the [NAME] #3 medication cart was conducted with Staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to use appropriate hand hygiene while assisting two residents (Resident #85 and #12) with their meals, left nebulizer tubing unbagged for one resident (Resident #2), a catheter bag was stored inappropriately for one resident (Resident #127), and failed to ensure two glucometers were cleaned and disinfected in between residents appropriately and according to manufacturer's recommendation. Findings included: 1. On 02/18/20 at 11:41 a.m., observations were made in the main dining room on the second floor. Staff W, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was observed sitting in the middle of Resident #85 and #12 at the table and assisting them with their meals. Continued observations revealed Staff W was assisting both residents with their meals by using her right hand only to assist both residents and was not noted to wash or sanitize her hands in between assisting the residents. Staff W was also observed giving the residents juice from a cup with the right hand only and was not noted to wash or sanitize her hands in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to assess two residents (Resident #34 and #73) out of the sampled 58 residents for the self-administration of medications. Findings included: On 02/17/20 at 2:05 p.m., Resident #34 was observed in her room administering her breathing treatment with a nebulizer machine without nurse assistance. On 02/17/20 at 2:08 p.m., Resident #73 was observed in her room administering her breathing treatment with a nebulizer machine without nurse assistance. On 02/17/20 at 2:09 p.m., the Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), confirmed that she was the nurse for both residents. Staff C was down the hall from the residents' room near the nurses' station on the medication cart. Staff C was asked if the residents could self-administer their own medications, and she stated that they were not self-administering their own medication. She stated that she gave them the treatment, and after 10 minutes she goes back to the room to check on them. A record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the code status for one resident (Resident #26) out of the sampled 58 residents. Findings included: The Face Sheet revealed that Resident #26 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to Dementia and altered mental status. Section C of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an effective date of 10/01/19 revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired. A record review of the Face Sheet for Resident #26 under the Advance Directives section revealed that the resident's code status was listed as Full Code and Do Not Resuscitate (DNR). The banner at the top of the resident's electronic medical record indicated that she had a code status of DNR (photographic evidence obtained). The Face Sheet revealed that Resident #26 had a family member listed as the Power of Attorney (POA). A review of the February 2020…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to perform an Comprehensive Resident Centered Care Plans including a baseline care plan on admission for one of 58 sampled residents (#256). Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/17/20 at 1:10 p.m. Resident #256 was sitting at the dining room table having only eaten a few bites of his lunch. He stated he had eaten a big breakfast and was not very hungry. The resident had multiple discolored areas on both hands and arms. Observation on 02/19/20 at 3:45 p.m. the resident was in the dining room in a wheelchair. He was dressed and groomed for the day in shorts. He was noted to have discolored areas on both hands and arms as well as both knees. Resident #256 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA) and unsteady gait. A record review showed the chart lacked an admission assessment nor baseline care plan for the 02/15/20 admission. During an interview on 02/19/20 at 9:00 a.m. the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and resident and staff interview, it was determined the facility did not ensure that a care plan was developed related to communication for 1 of 58 residents reviewed (#139). Findings Included: Review of the record for Resident #139 revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. Diagnoses on the face sheet revealed Displaced fracture of base of neck of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing, History of falling, Other specialized disorders of muscle, Other abnormalities of gait and mobility, Muscle wasting and atrophy, Dysphasia following cerebral infarction, pain, Hyperlipidemia, Anxiety disorder, Age related osteoporosis, Hypertension, Embolism and thrombosis of unspecified artery, Unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, Major depressive disorder. Review of the hospital record from the discharge on [DATE] revealed diagnoses which included Expressive Aphasia and Dysarthria secondary to old stroke. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #26) out of the sampled 58 residents who was identified as a risk for elopement was assessed appropriately. Findings included: On 02/17/20 at 1:58 p.m., a wanderguard was observed on Resident #26's right wrist. On 02/18/20 at 10:05 a.m., the resident was observed sitting in the hallway near the nurses' station. The wanderguard was observed on Resident #26's right wrist. On 02/20/20 at 1:48 p.m., Staff V, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), reported that Resident #26 had had the wanderguard for a while. When asked had Resident #26 ever tried to elope, Staff V stated that she had found Resident #26 downstairs on the first floor a few times and she had to bring her back up to the second floor. On 02/20/20 at 12:30 p.m., Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), reported that she did not see an order for the wanderguard. Staff L was asked where was the elopement book and she stated that she would have to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, resident record review and review of policy and procedure, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident who was admitted as continent of bladder and bowel received services and assistance to maintain continence for one (#210) of 58 residents reviewed. Findings included: Review of the record for Resident # 210 revealed that she was admitted from the hospital on 1/30/20. Review of the admission nursing clinical note, dated 1/31/20 revealed that the resident was continent of bowel and bladder. Review of the the nursing admission evaluation, completed on 1/3/120 revealed that the resident was continent of bladder. Bowel continence status was not documented. A Minimum Data Set ( MDS) admission assessment, with a lock date of 2/12/20, indicated a score of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment which indicated cognitively intact. The MDS assessment indicated the resident needed the extensive assist of two persons for bed mobility, transfer, dressing and toilet use. Urinary incontinence and bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pharmacy recommendations were acted upon for three of six sampled residents (#36, #50 and #118). Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/17/20 at 11:10 a.m. Resident #36 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Her call light was within reach. She became upset during the interview and the interview was halted. The surveyor thanked the resident for her time and excused herself. Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to depression and Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA). Record review of the physician orders and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January and February showed: Zoloft (Sertraline) 100 mg tablet (100 mg) tablet every day started 08/13/19 and discontinued on 01/23/20 for depression Zoloft (Sertraline) 50 mg tablet (150 mg) tablet oral every day started 01/24/20 for major depression, an order date of 01/23/20. A physician order dated 01/23/20 showed increase…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-eight medication administration opportunities were observed, and four errors were identified for three (#155, #103, and #130) of seven residents observed. These errors constituted a 14.29% medication error rate. Findings included: On 2/18/20 at 4:20 p.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff Member I, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was conducted with Resident #155. Staff Member I was observed administering the following medications: - Active Protein 30 milliliters (mL) orally - Novolog 100 unit/mL Flexpen, 10 units subcutaneously Prior to the administration, Staff Member I obtained a blood glucose level, using an Evercare G3 glucometer, of HI. The staff member informed the resident the doctor would need to be notified. A review of Resident #155's February Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed a sliding scale of units to be administered dependent on the blood glucose level of the resident. The sliding scale…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of 58 sampled residents was free from a significant medication error related to one resident receiving an incorrect dosage of Zoloft (#36) and one resident not receiving all their medications on dialysis days (#151). Findings included: 1. Observation on 02/17/20 at 11:10 a.m. Resident #36 was lying in bed with the head of the bed elevated. Her call light was within reach. She became upset during the interview and the interview was halted. The surveyor thanked the resident for her time and excused herself. Resident #36 was admitted on [DATE]. Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to depression and Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA). The physician orders and Medication Administration Record for January and February showed: Zoloft (Sertraline) 100 mg tablet (100 mg) tablet every day starting 08/13/19 and discontinue on 01/23/20 for depression Zoloft (Sertraline) 50 mg tablet (150 mg) tablet oral every day starting 01/24/20…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2020-02-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record was accurate and complete for one (#138) of 58 sampled records related to falls. Findings included: Observation on 02/17/20 at 12:54 p.m. Resident #138 was out of bed sitting in a broda chair. She had enablers in an up position with a mat in place beside of her bed. The medical record showed she had fallen out of bed. She had an egg-shaped swollen area over her right eye. There was a purplish yellow discolored area from her eye down her right cheek. She was dressed and groomed for the day including her hair being combed. She was drinking a soda. On 02/19/20 at 3:50 p.m. it was noted that she had a discolored area on her right hand also. Record review of the facility's policy, Fall Prevention Program, not dated showed to assure proper follow-up is carried out to reduce the amount of resident falls through assessment and staff awareness and implementation of appropriate interventions. The members of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$16,801 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
- $12,784 — penalty dated 2024-04-10
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in FL
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105351. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.