Elon Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 30% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 75.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.479 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 16 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-04-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate one (1) of one (1) resident's choice to close the room door at night for privacy and personal comfort (Resident #39); and two (2) of two (2) residents right to use electric wheelchairs to support mobility, independence, and the resident's highest practicable level of functioning (Resident #s 44 and 96). This failure caused Resident #44 frustration, anxiety, mental anguish, and self-isolation, which resulted in psychological harm.The findings include:1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, recurrent; muscle weakness; intermittent explosive disorder (added 09/15/2025); and pain in right elbow. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 15/15, which reflected intact cognition. MDS dated [DATE] revealed the resident was mobile with an electric wheelchair;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed related to: 1) staff performing hand hygiene when completing medication administration, 2) cleaning of multi-use equipment, such as blood glucose monitors and blood pressure cuffs, in between uses on residents, and 3) an uncleanable surface in one of two resident shower rooms in the one west unit. Findings included: 1. On 2/23/26 at 9:20 a.m. during medication administration observation Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) used her fingers to place vitamin D-3, aspirin, Iron, and sodium chloride pills into a medication cup to administer to Resident #62. On 2/23/26 at approximately 9:23 a.m. after preparing medications for Resident #62, Staff A, RN did not perform hand hygiene (HH) and entered room [ROOM NUMBER] put gloves on and resecured ace bandage on the resident's right arm. Staff A, RN removed gloves, did not perform HH, entered Resident #62's room and administered medications to the resident. On 2/23/26 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-25 · tag F0924 — pattern
  Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, facility record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure handrails were affixed to the wall in a safe and secure manner in two floors (200 and 100) of two floors observed, during three days (2/22/2026, 2/23/2026, and 2/24/2026) of four days observed. Findings included: During a facility wide tour on 2/22/2026 at 9:15 a.m., at 2:00 p.m. and on 9/23/2026 at 8:30 a.m., the following was observed: 1. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located before the shower room was not affixed tightly to the wall. 2. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located across from the nurse station and below the mirror and clock was not affixed tightly to the wall. 3. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located on the right side of the nurse's station door was not affixed tightly to the wall. 4. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located between resident rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] was not affixed tightly to the wall. 5. The 2nd floor hallway handrail located on the left side of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was not affixed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to notify the Power of Attorney (POA) of a change in condition related to weight loss for one resident (#41) out of five residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings included: Review of the admission record revealed Resident #41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted on [DATE]. Review of the advance directives revealed Resident #41had a medical and financial decisionmaker/ Power of Attorney (POA) to make his decisions. The medical diagnosis sheet revealed diagnoses to included but not limited to muscle weakness, quadriplegia, contracture of muscle unspecified on upper arm, need for assistance with personal care, contracture lower leg, disorder of bone density, and structure, dysphagia, protein calorie malnutrition, and gastrostomy.Review of the physician's orders for the month of 2/2026 revealed; Diet Order - NPO (nothing by mouth); Enteral feeding Jevity 1.5 75 ml (milliliters) per hour for 1500 liters bid (twice daily)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure a clean and home-like environment in two resident rooms (103 and 201) out of 25 rooms observed, and in one shower room (West Unit) of two observed.Findings included: On 2/22/26 at 9:38 a.m., an observation of the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER], by the resident's bed and bedside table, revealed a cockroach crawling next to the call light located on the floor. On 2/22/26 at 12:18 p.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the floor, between the resident's bed and dresser, had a large hole with wood and unidentifiable material exposed, as well as pieces of tile missing. Further observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the area under the sink had a large hole, that exposed pipes and wood, and cracked tile pieces. The area under the sink revealed multiple pieces of painter's tape that separated from the wall and a clear, thin sheet of plastic material was covering approximately half of the hole. The room further revealed a white dresser located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to complete/update the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARRs) for residents with a mental disorder and individuals with intellectual disability following qualifying mental health diagnoses for one resident (#5) of 52 residents reviewed for PASARRsFindings included:Review of the admission record showed Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of dementia. Other diagnoses included Parkinsonism, mood disorder, depression, psychosis and cognitive communication deficit.Review of a level I PASARR for Resident #5 dated 9/11/25 revealed a completed Level I PASARR with qualifying diagnoses. The review showed the Level I PASARR was complete, and a level II was not submitted for consideration following qualifying diagnoses.During an interview on 2/25/26 at 12:46 p.m. Staff A, Social Service Director (SSD) said Resident #5 did not need a Level II PASARR because the resident is functioning, able to explain…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) related to nail care were provided for one resident (#9) out of three residents sampled.Findings included:On 02/22/2026 at 12:55 PM, Resident #9 was observed to have brown and red substances underneath the fingernails. Resident #9's fingernails were about half an inch past the fingertips.Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed diagnoses of cerebral infarction, unspecified, muscle weakness (generalized), hereditary and idiopathic neuropathy, unspecified, other lack of coordination, and acquired absence of left and right legs above knees.Review of Resident #9's medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 indicating cognitive function was intact with little to no memory or thinking impairment.A review of Resident #9's ADL sheets did not show documented refusals of personal hygiene care for the month of January 2026. The ADL sheets for the month of February 2026 were not provided for review.A review of Resident #9's shower…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen were followed for one resident (#24) out of two residents sampled and failed to ensure the resident had physician orders for oxygen use for one resident (#54) out of two residents sampled.Findings included: 1. On 02/22/2026 at 12:00 PM, Resident #24 was observed to have an oxygen concentrator set to a four-liter (L) flow rate. Resident #24 said the concentrator was set to a flow rate of four or five.A review of Resident #24's medical diagnoses revealed chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), unspecified, COPD with (acute) exacerbation, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, centrilobular emphysema.A review of Resident #24's order summary report revealed an order to check oxygen saturation levels as needed and oxygen at 2L (liters) per minute via nasal cannula every shift related to COPD with (acute) exacerbation.An interview with Staff N, Registered Nurse (RN) on 02/24/2026 at 12:43 PM revealed Resident #24 had orders for oxygen via nasal cannula set at a 2L…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5.00%. Thirty-three medication administration opportunities were observed, and two errors identified for two (#49 and #92) of five residents observed. These errors constituted a 6.06% medication error rate.Findings Include:On 2/24/2026 at 11:15 a.m. an observation of medication administration with Staff B, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) conducted with Resident #49. Staff B, LPN performed HH, removed an Novolog FlexPen injector pen from the medications cart. She verified the insulin type/expiration, attach a new needle and turned the dosage dial to administer 4 units. Cleaned the insertion site with alcohol and let it dry and administered the medication.Review of Resident #49 medication orders revealed an order for Novolog FlexPen 100 unit/ml inject as per sliding scale: if 150-199 = 2 units; 200 - 249 = 4 units; 250 - 299 = 6 units; 300 - 349 = 8 units ; 350 - 399 = 10 units, subcutaneously with meals for Diabetes Mellitus (DM) greater than 400, please notify…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0568 — pattern
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to implement an accurate and up to date system for the accounting of residents' personal funds entrusted to the facility for three (#3, #5, and #6) of three residents sampled for resident funds review. Findings included: Review of accounts records for Resident's #3, #5 and #6 showed the residents' cost of care being withdrawn from their personal funds account did not consistently match what the Medicaid Access eligibility had determined, and Social Security direct deposits for January and February 2025 were not reflected in the accounts. On 02/19/2025 at 10:23 a.m. Resident #6 was observed in her room and she agreed to an interview. During the interview, she stated she had a concern with her resident trust fund, the monies held by the facility. She said, I am not sure if my balance is accurate. A couple of months ago they took a two-month payment at one time and then no payment for my room and board bill. I worry if I have enough money there. On 02/19/2025 at 1:30 p.m. a telephone interview was conducted with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-19 · tag F0569 — pattern
  Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure personal funds deposited with the facility were conveyed to the resident or resident representative within thirty days after discharge or death for three (#4, #7, #8) of three residents sampled for return of funds in a timely manner. Findings included: On 02/19/2025, the facility provided a list of residents with personal trust fund accounts. During the review of the list provided, three residents were sampled for conveyance of funds, Resident #4, #7, and #8. Review of the facility's Resident Fund Management Services (RFMS), listing the following residents and resident fund balances as of 02/19/2025: Resident #4, with a balance of $3, 814.35. Resident #7, with a balance of $1,470.59. Resident #8, with a balance of $340.54 Review of Resident #4's clinical chart the admission record, documented an initial admission of 04/17/2020, readmission of 11/01/2024; and a discharge to the community on 12/17/2024. Review of Resident #7's clinical chart, the admission record, documented an admission of 12/09/2021, and discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$30,989 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $20,910 — penalty dated 2026-02-25
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-12-21
• $6,351 — penalty dated 2023-12-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL