No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oasis At The Keys Nursing And Rehab

48 High Point Road, Tavernier, FL 33070 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (305) 853-0799 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 immediate-jeopardy citation$6,857 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $6,857 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-26)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
202 Plantation Ave · (305) 852-5751 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
91410 Overseas Hwy · (305) 852-7940 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
90164 Overseas Hwy · (305) 852-5492 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(305) 664-2406 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
89500 Overseas Hwy · (305) 852-5372

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.7%8.7%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%0.7%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.3%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.2%2.5%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened11.8%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication28.1%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.5%10.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.2%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.3%94.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.0%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.4%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.942.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.461.151.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

46.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 96 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

46.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.40U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.16hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF46.1%CMS range 38.7–56.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.7%CMS range 8.7–17.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified83.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting44.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge47.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization10.7%CMS range 7.3–15.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.221.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.74
RN hours/ resident / day
0.64
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.76
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.64
RN hoursweekends
39.8%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 98.7 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.76 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.74 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.90 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-26)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2022-06-30)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2020-11-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to follow the manufacturer's instruction for cleaning and disinfecting of the Assure Prism multi Blood Glucose Monitoring System (blood glucose meter) for 2 (Residents #15 and Resident #64) of 3 residents reviewed who had physicians' orders for blood sugar test (a blood sugar test was a procedure that measures the amount of sugar, or glucose, in your blood). Inadequate disinfection may result in indirect contact transmission (the transfer of an infectious agent through a contaminated inanimate object). Certain pathogens could contaminate and survive on equipment and environmental surfaces for long periods of time. The facility was unable to show documentation of a functioning infection control program. The failure to properly disinfect the blood glucose meters used for multiple residents resulted in a pattern of noncompliance at Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), scope and severity of K starting on 11/18/20. The Administrator was notified of the IJ on 11/18/20 at 4:00 p.m. The immediacy was removed on 11/20/20 at 1:25 p.m.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · H2020-11-20 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the administration failed to use its resources effectively and efficiently. The facility failed to self-identify deficient practices which had the likelyhood to produce negative outcomes. The findings included: On 11/20/20 at 1:00 p.m., during the Quality Assurance interview the facility Administrator said he was not aware the facility had an issue with the cleaning and disinfection of the blood glucose meters. The administration staff did not identify the nursing staff was not following the manufacturer's instructions for cleaning and disinfecting the Assure Prism multi-use Blood Glucose Monitoring System (blood glucose meters). The DON said they did not have a policy or procedure for the process and said she would have to look at manufacturer's directions for the correct process. She said she thought you could wipe it with an alcohol wipe. This practice likely put 17 residents who have glucose monitoring at risk of contracting bloodborn pathogen's. On 11/19/20 at 2:29 p.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON), who was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured, locked and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors, or under direct observation of authorized staff for 1 (Resident #6) of 3 residents interviewed in their room. The findings included: Facility policy titled Medication Administration indicated under Bullet #7: Medications cannot be left at the bedside of residents. Nurses must ensure the residents take medications. On 1/4/24 at 9:31 a.m., during an interview with Resident #6 in her room, a medication cup with a blue pill in it was noted on her dresser. Resident #6 said she didn't know why the medication was there, what the medication was or who had left it there. (photographic evidence obtained) On 1/14/24 at 9:35 a.m., Staff F Registered Nurse (RN) said she hadn't given Resident #6 medications and that it may have been left there by the overnight staff. On 1/14/25 at 9:35 a.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) said it is policy not to leave meds unattended in room and she would begin an investigation and re-education.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was kept clean and sanitary and maintained in safe operating order to prevent contamination of the ice for 1 of 1 ice machine in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure food items in 1 of 2 nourishment refrigerators on the units were dated and labeled so as to prevent the potential for foodborne illness. The findings included: On 04/22/24 at 11:27 a.m., during a tour of the kitchen, the white plastic flap inside the ice machine was noted to be dirty with condensation dripping down through the dirty areas onto the ice. When wiped with a cloth this substance revealed a milky, tan colored, slimy substance. The rear of the ice machine had black spots and when wiped with a cloth revealed a dry, black substance. The filter on the ice machine had spaces to write when it was installed and when to replace but both spaces were blank. The filter label said recommended filter replacement every 12 months. The inspection sticker was dated 9/20/21. * On 4/22/24 at 11:30 a.m., the Food Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) information on a quarterly basis and ensure staffing information was accurately reported as required by regulation. The findings included: Review of the PBJ report shows the facility had not been reporting quarterly staffing data as required by regulation. On 4/25/24 at 9:39 a.m., the Administrator verified the facility had not reported PBJ data for the last three quarters. There was a change of ownership in March of 2023 and he was not made aware of the company not reporting the PBJ data for two quarters. He said he had attempted to complete the data on the third quarter but was not able to. The Administrator said he now has a software contract that will enable him to report the PBJ data on time.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility's policies and procedures, and staff interview the facility failed to implement timely preventive measures and failed to alter the plan of care to include offloading of the area when a pressure ulcer developed for 1 (Resident #6) of 2 residents reviewed who developed a pressure ulcer at the facility. The lack of timely and appropriate interventions resulted in Resident #6 developing a new unstageable pressure ulcer on her right heel as well as a worsening of her previously resolved pressure ulcer on her right heel. Resident #6 now has 2 unstageable facility acquired pressure ulcers. The findings included: On 4/25/24 at 9:50 a.m., during a wound care observation for Resident #6 performed by RN Staff C the resident was observed in bed laying slightly on her right side. Resident was awake and stated that she was ok with the nurse doing her wound care treatment at the time. Resident feet were uncovered and her left foot was observed to be laying on one pillow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to ensure the safety of residents, staff and guests by failing to ensure propane emergency shut off valve for the laundry room dryers was accessible in the event of an emergency. The findings included: On 4/23/24 at 8:23 a.m., during an initial tour of the laundry room the propane emergency shut off valve for the dryers was blocked by carts, cleaning carts and bins of clothing, making it unreachable in an emergency situation. * On 4/23/24 at 8:43 a.m., in an interview the Maintenance Director said he said he only handles the maintenance concerns and had nothing to do with the blocked access to the propane emergency shut off valve. The Maintenance Director said, The end dryer does not work so it does not matter if there is stuff blocking it, the dryer is broke. This writer asked if the other 2 working dryers run on propane and he said yes. He was asked how anyone would get to the propane shut off valve in case of an emergency and he replied, I see what you mean, I will get the Housekeeping Supervisor. On 4/23/24 at 8:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and facility policy the facility failed to ensure quarterly elopement risk assessments were completed appropriately for 1 of 6 residents surveyed for elopement risk (Resident #17). The lack of appropriately assessing the resident had a potential to contribute to the resident eloping from the facility. The findings included: The facility's policy on elopement reads, Cognitively impaired residents at risk for elopement will be appropriately monitored to reduce the potential for injury. Elopement is defined as a resident leaving the physical structure of the facility without the knowledge of the facility staff .Residents shall be reassessed at least quarterly related to elopement risk. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Upon admission she was diagnosed with Alzheimer's Disease. On 12/2/21 Resident #17 was diagnosed with General Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder. Review of the facility investigation shows On 2/26/24 at 3:45 p.m. facility staff were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, review of facility policy and procedure, review of the Operating Manual for the concentrator, review of the clinical record and staff interview, the facility failed to follow their policy and procedure and physician orders for the use of oxygen for 1(Resident #32) of 1 resident reviewed for oxygen use. The facility failed to have a system in place to ensure the oxygen concentrator filters were in place when the concentrator was in use per the manufacturers recommendations. The findings included: The facility policy Oxygen Equipment Use Policy documented, The facility is committed to providing a safe and healthy environment for residents and to minimize or prevent the spread of infections. Clean oxygen concentrator filters weekly. Review of the Operating Manual for the 5-liter oxygen concentrator specified: Never block air openings of the oxygen concentrator or place it where the air openings may be obstructed. Keep the openings free of lint, hair dust, etc. Warning: Do Not operate the concentrator without the filters installed, or if filters are wet. Permanent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-06-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain cooking equipment, storage racks and physical facilities in a sanitary manner. The findings included: On 6/27/22 at 9:24 a.m., during an initial tour of the kitchen the cooking oven, range, hood, prep tables, utility carts, and storage racks were observed dirty with grease, grimy residue, and debris. Photographic evidence obtained The wall in the dish room had large patches of missing tiles and the floor has broken and missing tiles. Photographic evidence obtained The grease trap on the griddle was full of grease and unable to be removed. The drip pan on the range had a large accumulation of grease and debris. A large amount of liquid grease was observed under the foil liner on the drip pan. Photographic evidence obtained The Utility carts were dirty with grime and debris. Photographic evidence obtained The storage rack holding clean baking sheets and cooking pans has collected grease, lint, and other debris. Photographic evidence obtained Shelves below and above preparation tables are dirty with grime and debris. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-06-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to properly contain and dispose of garbage and refuse. The findings included: On 6/27/22 9:10 a.m., the two dumpsters were observed to be full of bags of refuse and cardboard boxes. One of the dumpsters was overflowing. The lids were not closed over the garbage. There were bags of refuse on the ground around the dumpsters and litter around the area. There was a container the size of a dumpster constructed of a steel frame and chain link fencing filled with construction debris and cardboard boxes. Observation of the dumpsters on 6/29/22 at 7:45 a.m. found the garbage was still not properly contained. The dumpsters were overflowing and uncovered. On 6/30/22 at 12:01 p.m., the administrator said he was aware the garbage was not properly contained in the dumpsters. He said he was not sure when the last pick up was made but the pick-up schedule with the waste company was for Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and clean environment with regard to furnishings and personal care items for 5 (room [ROOM NUMBER], 213, 215, 214 and 216) of 20 occupied resident rooms reviewed on the second floor of the facility. The findings included: On 6/27/22 at 10:05 a.m., during initial tour of the second floor, the base of over bed table in room [ROOM NUMBER] B was observed dirty with food splatter and corrosion. Photographic evidence obtained The side chair was dirty with grime and stains. Photographic evidence obtained The wall and privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER] were splattered with multiple brownish stains of tube feeding residue. Photographic evidence obtained The bed frame in room [ROOM NUMBER] A was dirty with sticky brown residue. Photographic evidence obtained On 6/29/22 at 10:32 a.m., the base of the over bed tables of room [ROOM NUMBER] A and B were dirty with residue and corrosion. Photographic evidence obtained The wall and privacy curtain in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, records review and facility policy review the facility failed to ensure an ongoing activities program for 7 (Residents, # 9, #52, #18, 36, #15, #55 and #61) of 9 residents reviewed for activities. The findings included: Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Activities, revised May 16, 2022, which said Purpose: To ensure residents are offered activities that are compatible with the resident's individual physical and mental capabilities. 1. On 6/27/22 at 9:57 a.m., Resident # 61 was observed wandering in hall repeatedly pacing back and forth the length of the unit. On 6/27/22 at 1:21 p.m., Resident #61 observed again wandering in hall, repeatedly pacing back and forth the length of the unit occasionally attempting to enter rooms not assigned to Resident #61. Redirected by staff when attempting to enter rooms not assigned to Resident #61. On 6/28/22 at 8:22 a.m., Resident # 61 observed doing the same wandering behavior on unit. On 6/28/22 at 3:45 p.m., Resident # 61…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0680 — pattern
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the employee file, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the activities program was directed by a professional with the required qualifications. This has the potential to affect all current residents at the facility. The findings included: On 6/29/22 at 11:25 a.m., the Activities Director said she was currently working on her Activities Professional Certification. The Activities Director said she has not worked within the last five years in a social or recreational program and had no experience in long term care. She said the past eight years she was watching her grandchildren. On 6/30/22 at 4:48 p.m., review of the Activity Director with the Administrator verified the Activities Director did not have the qualifications to develop and supervise the activity program. the Administrator said, No she does not have the training. We have paid for her training, and she is working on it.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and staff record reviews, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Staff B, C, and D) of 3 nursing assistant employee records reviewed had a performance review completed at least once every 12 months/yearly. The facility failure to conduct a 12-month/yearly performance review could lead to the nursing staff not receiving the required in-service education to address areas of weakness identified in their yearly performance review. The findings included: On 6/30/2022, a review of Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) Staff B's employee file revealed they were hired 8/28/19. There was no documentation Staff B's employee performance review was completed in 2021 with in-service education to address any areas of weakness identified. On 6/30/2022, a review of CNA Staff C's employee file revealed they were hired 9/23/2019. There was no documentation Staff C's employee performance review was completed in 2021 with in-service education to address any areas of weakness identified. On 6/30/2022, a review of CNA Staff D's employee file revealed they were hired 7/30/2020. There was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-06-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, facility policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to establish a system of record of receipt and disposition of all controlled drugs in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled, Controlled Substance Storage dated August 2019 stated, Accountability records for discontinued controlled substances are maintained with the unused supply until it is destroyed or disposed of. On 6/29/22 at 12:44 p.m., interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) about the process for management of controlled substances after medication is discontinued or resident is discharged . The DON said, After resident discharged or the controlled substance is discontinued, the nurse brings the controlled substance and log paper to me. We both verify the log is accurate and number listed on log matches the number of medications being turned in. The nurse signs the log and I store the controlled substances in the locked file cabinet in my locked office until I can meet with the pharmacist and do the destruction. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to provide the resident and the representative, if applicable, with a written summary of the baseline care plan which included initial goals and a summary of current medications and dietary instructions for 4 (Resident #42, #57, #60, and #417) of 5 residents reviewed for baseline care plans. The findings included: 1. On 6/28/22 at 11:16 a.m., Resident #60's wife said she did not recall receiving a copy of a written summary of the baseline care plan or a summary of medications. On 6/30/22 at 9:50 a.m., record review showed Resident #60's admission date was 5/27/22. The clinical record lacked evidence of a written baseline care plan which included initial goals, and a summary of current medications and dietary instructions. 2. On 6/30/22 at 9:51 a.m., Resident #417 record review revealed an admission date of 6/9/22. The clinical record lacked evidence a written summary of the baseline care plan which included initial goals, and a summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive resident-centered care plan for 1 (Residents #57) of 3 residents reviewed for specialized rehabilitation services. The failure to develop and implement a resident-centered care plan could lead to a decline and/or failure to meet the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The findings included: On [DATE] at 12:45 p.m., observed Resident #57 in her bed with her right arm in a sling. Resident #57 said she fell at home, broke her arm and she was here to get better so she can go home. She said since arriving at the facility she doesn't remember anyone going over their plan of care in getting her strong enough so she can go home. On [DATE] review of Resident #57's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to a fracture to the upper end of right humerus, and generalized weakness. Further review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to revise, and update the resident's care plan to accurately reflect the resident's condition and needs for 1 (Resident #49) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers. The findings included: The facility Pressure Injury Prevention and Management Policy provided by the facility (undated) page 3 under the Risk Assessments heading number 4 reads: Findings from the pressure ulcer/injury risk assessment will be incorporated into the resident's plan of care. On 6/28/2022 at 11:15 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse Staff L was observed, cleaning and changing the dressings to Resident #49's wound to the right heel and right lateral malleolus (bone segment that forms the ankle). No wound was observed to the sacrum. Review of the Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) wound report dated 5/5/22 showed Resident #49 had a pressure wound to the right heel and the right lateral malleolus which were facility acquired. Review of the clinical record for Resident #49 revealed a care plan for skin integrity revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide care and services to maintain or improve ability to carry out activities of daily living for 1 (Resident #47) of 3 residents reviewed for functional abilities. The findings included: Review of record for Resident #47 revealed she was admitted to facility on 8/7/20 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (Paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness or partial paralysis of one side of the body) following Cerebral Infarction affecting Right Dominant side, aphasia (disorder affecting ability to communicate), and diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of the list provided by the facility showed Resident #47 was included in a Functional Maintenance Program (program designed to maintain performance after discharge from therapy). On 6/27/22 at 10:00 a.m., 6/28/22 at 9:40 a.m., and 11:15 a.m.,6/29/22 at 9:31 a.m., and 6/30/22 at 10:00 a.m., Resident #47 was observed in bed, sleeping. On 6/27/22 at 12:00 p.m., and 2:58 p.m., Resident #47 was observed in bed watching television.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff, and resident interviews the facility failed to provide supervision during smoking for 1 (Resident #47) of 1 resident reviewed for smoking. This places the resident at risk for injuries. The findings included: Record review for Resident #47 revealed a smoking assessment done on 9/10/20, indicating Pt need to be supervised by staff while smoking. Pt needs an apron while smoking. Further review revealed a Smoking assessment done on 5/28/21, section D Smoking Habit Evaluation #4: someone to light/extinguishing cigarette. Care plan for smoking cigarettes under interventions indicates The Resident requires supervision while smoking. On 6/28/22 at 3:41 p.m., Resident #47 was observed in the smoking area with no staff supervision, and she was holding a lit cigarette with her left hand. No other residents smoking at the time, she was noted in this area by herself. On 6/29/22 at 3:45 p.m., Resident #47 was observed smoking outside the window of admission office, no one was in that office, she was smoking unsupervised. At 3:50 p.m., she rolled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assist 1 (Resident #39) of 1 resident reviewed in obtaining routine dental care for missing dentures. The findings included: On 6/27/22 at 11:31 a.m., Resident #39 said earlier in the year he went out to the hospital for a pacemaker and his front teeth went missing. The resident said he was told the dentist could replace them, but he does not know what going on. He said he wants permanent front teeth. On 6/29/22 at 12:15 p.m., Unit Manager Staff P said she was not aware of the Resident #39's teeth issue. She did not realize the teeth were missing nor did she know the resident wanted them replaced. On 6/29/22 at 1:58 p.m., the Social Services Director said the facility has a designated dentist who will come to the facility within 48 hours of making an appointment. The Social Services Director said she was not aware of Resident #39's dental needs. She said the resident had not expressed a need for dental care. She said she will get a consult. The Social Services Director said the resident has his own dentist and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-06-30 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interview, the facility failed to obtain or provide Therapy Services for 2 (Resident #42 and #417) of 2 residents reviewed for Rehabilitation Services. This has the potential to inhibit the progress in ambulation and Activities of Daily Living. The findings included: 1. Review of the clinical record for Resident #42 revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side of the body) following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. The clinical record contained a physician's order dated 5/18/22 for Physical, and Occupational Therapy evaluation and treatment. On 6/28/22 at 12:15 p.m., Resident #42 stated he needed to get stronger to go home but he was not getting therapy. He tried to do exercises on his own to be active and move to an Assisted Living Facility. On 6/30/22 at 10:10 a.m., the Director of Rehabilitation reviewed Resident #42's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-11-20 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and staff interview the facility administration failed to demonstrate effective ongoing Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) resulting in repeat non compliance in the areas of providing assistance with activities of daily living for dependent residents, effective administration to maintain the highest practicable well being of residents, maintaining an effective infection prevention and control program and a clean, safe environment for the residents. The findings included: Review of the facility's history revealed on 5/2/20 the facility administration failed to report suspected COVID-19 case to the Department of Health as directed by the Florida Department of Health (DOH) to coordinate the State's response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The facility also failed to enact appropriate COVID-19 precautions and observe proper social distancing placing all residents of the facility at risk of COVID-19 infection. On 5/14/20 the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident on the COVID unit received the necessary assistance for bathing and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-11-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and lack of minutes from any Antibiotic Stewardship meetings, the facility was not able to provide evidence of a functioning Antibiotic Stewadship Program that develops, promotes, and implements a facility-wide system to monitor the use of antibiotics. The findings included: The DON who was the identified Infection Control Preventionist could not produce any minutes from the Antibiotic Stewardship meetings or activities. She said they were Zoom calls, but minutes were never taken regarding what was talked about. The facility failed to provide evidence of a functional Antibiotic Stewardship program.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2020-11-20 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and review of the Infection Preventionist required qualifications to have completed specialized training in infection prevention and control, the facility failed to have a qualified Infection Preventionist. The findings included: On 11/19/20 at 2:29 p.m., in an interview the Director of Nursing (DON), who was the designated Infection Preventionist, said I have not taken any Infection Preventionist training. No one in the facility has taken any additional infection control classes. The facility failed to have a qualified infection control preventionist to assist staff with infection control concerns and educate the staff on current infection control practices. This is evidenced by the blood glucose monitoring issues identifed during this survey.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2020-11-20 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to identify broken equipment on the dirty side of the laundry room. The facility failed to maintain a safe, sanitary, functional laundry area. The facility also failed to maintain clean and sanitary The findings included: On 11/16/20 at 8:45 a.m., observation of the dirty side of the laundry room revealed a very wet floor. Staff JJ said the pipes had been leaking for a while. When staff JJ turned on the faucet in the sink to wash her hands, water sprayed out of the faucet. The pipes under the sink were corroded and leaking. Four buckets were being used to catch the leaking water. On 11/16/20 9:15 a.m., the Maintenance Director said he checked for maintenance issues, and the cleaning and vacuuming of the dryer ventilation system in the laundry room on a monthly basis. At that time was not able to provide any documentation of a schedule. Prior to exit the administrator and maintenance director provided a Maintenance Cleaning and Vacuuming Monthly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-11-20 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to ensure physician progress notes for 12 (Residents #2,# 4, #6, #12, #34, #41, #42, #53, #57, #66, #67, and #70) of 12 residents reviewed were readily accessible and available for inspection in the resident's files. The findings included: On 11/18/20 at 1:00 p.m., record review of Resident #2, admission date 2/24/20, revealed there were no physician progress notes in the facility. When asked, the Director of Nursing was unable to provide any physician progress notes. On 11/18/20 at 1:00 p.m., record review of Resident #4, admission date 3/19/19, revealed there were no physician progress notes in the facility. When asked, the Director of Nursing was unable to provide any physician progress notes. On 11/18/20 at 1:00 p.m., record review of Resident #6, admission date 7/15/20, revealed there were no physician progress notes in the facility. When asked, the Director of Nursing was unable to provide any physician progress notes. On 11/18/20 at 1:00 p.m., record review of Resident #12, admission date 9/15/20, revealed there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-11-20 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 4 (Residents #24, #55, #58 and #65) of 4 residents on Pureed diets recieved the prescribed diet. (all foods have been ground, pressed, and/or strained to a soft, smooth consistency like a pudding). The facility failed to follow their policy for 4 (Residents #10, #11, #26, and #45) of 4 residents reviewed who were to be served double portions. The failures could potentially cause significant unintentional weight loss. The findings included: On 11/18/20 at 3:28 p.m., a review of the Exceptional Living Centers, Inc. Dietary Policies and Procedures dated 11/05, Subject: Altered Portions, 32 ELC, Inc. Dietary Policy & Procedure Manual revealed the following Policy: The dietary professional shall interview all residents upon admission and periodically as needed for food preferences and meal satisfaction. Altered portion sizes will be served upon request only with a physician's order. Procedure #3 included for double portions, serve two portions of meat, casseroles, potatoes or starch, vegetable and/or salad,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-11-20 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a nurse call system which relayed the call directly to a staff member or to a centralized staff work area on the first floor. This in the event of a resident emergency could result in staff not being aware or notified thereby endangering the resident from receiving immediate medical assistance. All residents on the first floor had the likelyhood of being effected by this practice. The findings included: On 11/16/20 at 10:30 a.m., in an interview Resident # 30 said the facility unhooked the call bell ringer at the nurse station from the light system so the nurses could no longer hear the call system. On 11/16/20 11:30 a.m., in an interview Resident #36 said the facility unhooked the call bell ringer at the nurse station from the light system so the nurses could no longer hear the call system. On 11/16/20 at 12:10 p.m., in an observation on the first floor, the nurse call light was observed on at the nurse station but there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-11-20 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation and staff and resident interview, the facility failed to ensure retention of personal property for 1 (Resident # 18) of 1 resident reviewed for personal belongings The findings included: On 11/16/20 at 10:22 a.m., in an interview, Resident #18 was alert and oriented. She said she was missing clothes and other items including her hairbrush, personal care items and her books. She said her name was on the clothes and she was also missing blankets. Resident #18 said she had been moved to a different room downstairs and the contents of her bedside dresser was still upstairs. The content of the bedside dresser did not get moved down to her new room. She was scheduled to stay in the new downstairs room. She said she was very upset since without her books she had nothing to do in her room since group activites were limited due to Covid. She said she told several CNA's and other staff her personal items and clothes were still upstairs in her old room. She said she was frustrated and did not understand why the staff could not bring her her personal items.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-11-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living to 1 (Resident #41) of 1 resident reviewed resulting in the resident not having weekly bed baths or showers, her hair washed, and fingernails being clipped and cleaned. The findings included: Record review of Resident #41's care plan stated she needed extensive assistance of 1 to 2 staff members to assist her with her ADL care. An intervention listed on the care plan was to provide scheduled showers as needed with the option of a sponge bath on non-shower days. On 11/16/20 at 1:54 p.m., Resident #41 was observed to have contractures in both of her hands. Her fingernails on both her hands were observed to be long and with dirt and debris. The resident's hair was observed to be unwashed and unbrushed with noted visible dandruff in her hair. Resident #41 said she was not capable of taking a shower because she had to have 2 staff members assist her with a Hoyer lift, and she was told by staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-11-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to assure infection control practices were maintained in the managing of the urinary catheter tubing and drainage collection bag to reduce potential contamination for 1 (Resident #41) of 1 sampled residents with indwelling catheters by allowing the drainage bag and/or tubing to be in contact with the floor. The findings included: On 11/16/20 at 9:30 a.m., Resident #41's Foley Catheter's (Catheter placed in the bladder to drain urine) clear tubing was observed with brown stains giving an appearance the line was completely full. The drainage bag was in a trash bag tied to the bed rail. Resident #41 said she's had the catheter for years and several urinary tract infections. On 11/17/20 at 10:00 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff M verified the Foley line was stained and needed to be changed. LPN Staff M verified the drainage bag was tied to the bed with a trash bag. Staff M said the bag did not have a hook to secure the bag to the bed. On 11/19/20 at 8:30 a.m., in an observation Resident #41's Foley drainage bag was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-11-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secure and inaccessible to unauthorized staff, residents, and visitors and were not kept under direct observation of authorized staff for 1 (Staff L) of 2 staff assisting with review for medication storage. The findings included: Review of facility policy titled Storage of Medications Reviewed/Revised December 15, 2018 stated the following in Guideline Bullet #6: Compartments containing medications are locked when not in use. Trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended. (Compartments include, but are not limited to drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts and boxes.) On 11/17/20 at 9:52 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) Staff L was assisting this surveyor with review of the 1st floor west medication cart. Staff L asked if it would be ok if she opened the cart for me and then left to go do something. The Director of Nursing (DON) was passing by at the time and advised Staff L…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$6,857 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $6,857 — penalty dated 2024-04-26

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CRYSTAL HEALTH OPCO HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2023
FRANKEL, JONATHANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
HIRSCH, JOSEPHIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
SOSKIN, MOSHEIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2023
LAZO, LAZAROIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025
GOODMAN, JAMIEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-4.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$491K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 71%Medicare 10%Other / private 19%

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $491K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$356per resident / day
operating cost
$10,835per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$341per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106092. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next