No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Buffalo Crossings Healthcare & Rehabilitation Cen

3875 Wedgewood Lane, The Villages, FL 32162 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (727) 581-4648 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20225 immediate-jeopardy citations
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2022
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
12109 County Road 103 · (352) 260-0055 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
675 Tatonka Terrace
Grocery
3740 Wedgewood Ln · (352) 391-9620 · Call to confirm hours
Park
4087 Co Rd 466 · (352) 461-0134 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4671 Bellwether Ln · (352) 753-9038

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.2%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms16.6%4.6%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.7%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.4%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.8%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control12.4%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table1.9%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.7%1.5%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.3%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%9.1%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.902.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.521.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 922 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.72U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.38hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.29hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 464 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.9%CMS range 69.7–74.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 7.2–10.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge55.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 3.8–7.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.01
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.58
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
47.0%
Total nursing turnover
35.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 113.9 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-17)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-12-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents were free from medical neglect. The facility failed to provide central venous catheter dressing changes and failed to ensure licensed practical nurses had the appropriate skills and competencies to administer intravenous medications via central venous access devices for 3 of 4 reviewed residents with central venous access devices, Residents #71, #289 and #297. The lack of appropriate dressing changes to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection, fluid leaking, redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in an increased risk of infection at the insertion site, sepsis (a life-threatening infection in the blood), damage to the vein, phlebitis (inflammation of a vein) or blood clots. The lack of IV certification and validation of competency for IV infusion can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots. Phlebitis can…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-12-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed practical nurses had the appropriate skills and competencies to administer intravenous (IV) medications via central venous access devices for 3 of 4 reviewed residents with central venous access devices, Residents #71, #289 and #297. The lack of IV certification and validation of competency for IV infusion can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to veins and injection sites, an air embolism, phlebitis, and blood clots. Phlebitis can cause blood clots, which can block important blood vessels, causing tissue damage or even be life threatening. Lack of training and verification to assess IV patency (the line is open and not blocked allowing the treatment to flow directly into the patient's vein) can increase the spread of infection and can result in the likelihood of increased risk of serious harm and/or death. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's admission records revealed the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-12-16 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility administration failed to ensure the highest practicable physical wellbeing of each resident by not assuming full responsibility for the day-to-day operations of the facility. The facility failed to provide central venous catheter dressing changes and failed to ensure licensed practical nurses had the appropriate skills and competencies to administer intravenous medications via central venous access devices for 3 of 4 reviewed residents with central venous access devices, Residents #71, #289 and #297. The lack of appropriate dressing changes to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection, fluid leaking, redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in an increased risk of infection at the insertion site, sepsis (a life-threatening infection in the blood), damage to the vein, phlebitis or blood clots. The lack of IV certification and validation of competency for IV infusion can result in an increased risk of infection, damage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · K2022-12-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement their Quality Assessment and Process Improvement (QAPI) policy and procedure to identify and correct quality deficiencies related to the following: ensuring residents with central venous catheters received dressing changes as ordered and ensuring licensed practical nurses had the appropriate skills and competencies to administer intravenous medications via central venous access devices for 3 of 4 reviewed residents with central venous access devices, Residents #71, #289 and #297. The lack of appropriate dressing changes to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection, fluid leaking, redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in an increased risk of infection at the insertion site, sepsis (a life-threatening infection in the blood), damage to the vein, phlebitis or blood clots. The Lack of IV certification and validation of competency for IV infusion can result in an increased risk of infection, damage to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all residents received treatment and care for peripherally inserted central catheters in accordance with professional standards of practice by failing to provide central venous dressing changes for 3 of 4 reviewed residents with central venous access devices, Residents #71, #289 and #297. The lack of appropriate dressing changes to assess the insertion site for signs and symptoms of infection, fluid leaking, redness, pain, tenderness, and swelling can result in an increased risk of infection at the insertion site, sepsis (a life-threatening infection in the blood), damage to the vein, phlebitis or blood clots, which can result in the likelihood of increased risk of serious harm and/or death. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's admission records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection of right lower extremity amputation stump, chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' preference for shower was honored for 1 (Resident #19) of 3 residents reviewed for activities of daily living. Findings include: Review of Resident #19's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and gout. During an interview on 7/14/2025 at 10:23 AM, Resident #19 stated, I have not received anything I asked for. Tissues, shower, hair wash. I have been asking for it since 7 AM this morning [7/14/2025]. I have wounds on legs that need to be covered or changed. I don't want to wait for a dressing change to take a shower. They can just cover my legs if dressing gets wet, then change it. During an interview on 7/15/2025 at 11:54 AM, Resident #19 stated, I did not get my shower yesterday [7/14/2025]. I did get washed up. That is not a shower and my hair washed. My son is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of a resident's admission for 1 (Resident #148) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: During an observation on 7/14/2025 at 11:44 AM, Resident #148 was sitting in a wheelchair in his room. There was a foam dressing on his right lower leg dated 7/11. Review of Resident #148's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including lobar pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, hypocalcemia, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, hypocalcemia, [NAME] syndrome, hypothyroidism, depression, atopic dermatitis, hyperlipidemia, essential hypertension, atherosclerosis of aorta, obstructive sleep apnea, pulmonary hypertension, emphysema, and cirrhosis of liver. Review of Resident #148's physician order dated 7/10/2025 read, Cleanse skin tear to the back of L [Left] calf with NS [normal saline], cover with adaptic [sic] and foam dressing Q3…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician- ordered parameters for administering hypertension medications were followed for 1 (Resident #40) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications and failed to ensure wound dressing was changed as per physician order for 1 (Resident #148) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #40’s admission record showed the resident’s diagnoses included essential (primary) hypertension, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease without heart failure, with stage 1 through stage 4 chronic kidney disease, unspecified atrial fibrillation, and hyperlipidemia. Review of Resident #40's physician order dated 6/11/2025 read, “Hydralazine HCl Oral Tablet 10 MG [milligrams] (Hydralazine HCl), Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours as needed for HTN [hypertension], Give if SBP [Systolic Blood Pressure] > [greater than]160 mmHg [millimeters of mercury].” Review of Resident #40’s Weights and Vital Signs Summary from 6/1/2025 through 6/30/2025 showed on 6/12/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, facility failed to ensure residents received restorative services for 1 (Resident#4) of 3 residents reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: During an interview on 7/14/2025 at 10:11 AM, Resident #4 stated, My main concern at this time is therapy services. I have not seen therapy, and I do not know what the plan is. Review of Resident #4's physician order dated 6/6/2025 read, Pt [patient]. D/C [discharge] from PT [Physical Therapy] services with RNP [Restorative Nursing Program] in place. Review of Resident #4's physician order dated 6/26/2025 read, Admit to RNP for AROM [Active Range of Motion]-omnicycle BUE [Bilateral Upper Extremities] and BLE [Bilateral Lower Extremities] prosthetic leg donned, transfers, donning/doffing prosthetic leg 3x [3 times] week for 60 days as per therapy recommendations. Review of Resident #4's PT Discharge Summary for service dates of 4/9/2025 through 6/6/2025 read, D/C Reason: Maximum Potential Achieved, referred to RNP. STG [Short Term Goal] #4.2- Met on 06/06/2025: Patient will increase LLE [Left Lower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory services consistent with professional standards of practice for 2 (Residents #19 and #147) of 4 residents reviewed for oxygen therapy. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #19's admission record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including muscle weakness, unsteady on feet, chronic respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure, and gout. During an observation on 7/14/2025 at 10:29 AM, Resident #19's nebulizer mask was on top of the bedside table not bagged. During an observation on 7/15/2025 at 11:54 AM, Resident #19's nebulizer mask was on top of the bedside table not bagged (Photographic evidence obtained). Review of Resident #19's physician order dated 6/27/2025 read, Ipratropium-Albuterol Solution 0.5-2.5 (3) mg/ml (milligram/milliliter) 3 ml inhale orally four times a day for COPD please schedule 0800 [8:00 AM], 1400 [2:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated, labeled and stored in a sealed container in nutrition rooms on 3 residential halls, Prairie, [NAME] and Meadows, of 4 residential halls.Findings include: During an observation on 7/14/2025 at 10:14 AM, there was one undated and unlabeled package of 12 waffles stored in the refrigerator in the nutrition room on the Prairie Hall. During an observation on 7/14/2025 at 10:17 AM, there was one undated and unlabeled Styrofoam cup of liquid stored on the counter in the nutrition room on the [NAME] Hall. During an observation on 7/14/2025 at 10:22 AM, there was one undated and unlabeled package of 12 waffles stored in the refrigerator in the nutrition room on the Meadows Hall. During an interview on 7/14/2025 at 10:14 AM, the Certified Dietary Manager confirmed the packages of waffles on the Prairie Hall and the Meadows hall should be dated and labeled when taken out of original containers and placed in nutrition…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident records were complete and accurate for 1 (Resident #62) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, 2 (Residents #8 and #148) of 3 residents reviewed for skin conditions, and 1 (Resident #117) of 3 residents reviewed for nutrition. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident #62’s physician order dated 6/4/2025 read, “Antianxiety side effects: 0= No side effects observed 1= Drowsiness 2= Slurred Speech 3= Dizziness 4= Nausea 5= Aggressive/Impulsive Behavior, every shift for Monitoring document applicable code.” Review of Resident #62’s physician order dated 6/4/2025 read, “Please document appropriate number that best matches behavior observed: 1= No behaviors noted 2= Kicking/Hitting 3= Grabbing/Pushing 4= Sexually Inappropriate 5= Yelling/Screaming/Cursing 6= Refusing Care (ADL [Activities of Daily Living], Meds [medications] etc ) 7= Wandering/Pacing 8= Exit Seeking 9= Crying 10= Wringing Hands 11= Withdrawn 12= Loss of appetite 13= Other (document in Progress Notes) every shift for psychoactive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident representative was informed of a change in the resident's status for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for change in status, Resident #1. Findings include: Review of Resident #1's admission record revealed the resident was most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including periprosthetic fracture around internal prosthetic left hip joint, anxiety, depression, and left artificial hip joint. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 6/3/2024 read, Focus: Surgical/Incision: Staples- I have surgical incision with staples. (D/C [discontinued] 6/10) . Interventions . Observe surgical staples for infection, drainage, increased swelling, warmth and surgical site reopening. Review of Resident #1's care plan dated 6/4/2024 read, Focus: I have impaired cognitive function or impaired thought processes r/t [related to] impaired decision making, Long term memory loss, Short term memory loss. Review of Resident #1's progress notes dated 6/17/2024 read,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 (Resident #106) of 1 resident reviewed for hospitalization and 1 (Resident #80) of 5 reviewed for hospice services. Findings include: 1. Review of the Discharge-Return Not Anticipated Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #106 was discharged to a Short-Term General Hospital (acute hospital, IPPS (Inpatient Prospective Payment System)). Review of the progress note dated 1/18/2024 for Resident #106 read, Resident discharged to ALF (Assisted Living Facility) at 1215 [12:15 PM]. Questions answered and confirmed understanding. Education provided. During an interview on 4/16/2024 at 9:10 AM, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator stated, For [Resident #106 Name] the Minimum Data Set Section A should have read ALF (Assisted Living Facility) instead of hospital. For [Resident #80's name] MDS Section O, hospice question should have said Yes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that resident records were complete and accurate for 2 of 5 residents sampled for medication administration record review. (Resident #92 and #262) Findings include: 1. Review of the admission record for Resident #92 documented the resident was admitted with a diagnosis of Hypertension, Acute on Chronic Systolic Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Ischemic Cardiomyopathy, an Automatic implantable Cardiac Defibrillator, and Atherosclerosis of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident #92 for 4/13/2024 and 4/14/2024, the MAR documents that the scheduled 9 AM medication administration for Amiodarone HCL Tablet 200 mg (milligrams), Ascorbic Acid 500mg, Aspirin 81mg tablet, Multiple Vitamin Tablet, Potassium Chloride 20meq tablet, Zinc Capsule 220mg, Acidophilus Capsule 100mg, Eliquis 2.5mg tablet, Gabapentin 100mg capsule, and Protein Oral Liquid 30ml, and Metoprolol 50mg tablet was refused (Chart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infection by not performing hand hygiene during medication administration in 2 out of 6 observations for medication administration and clean blood pressure cuff monitors between residents in 2 out of 6 observations. Finding include: During an observation of medication administration for Resident #92 on 4/14/2024 at 9:20 AM Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed entering the resident's room to check the resident's blood pressure with an automatic wrist cuff without performing hand hygiene. Staff B, RN returned the automatic blood pressure monitoring wrist cuff to the medication cart without cleaning the equipment after use. During an observation of medication administration for Resident #92 on 4/14/2024 at 9:32 AM, Staff B, RN started preparing the medications for Resident #92 without performing hand hygiene. Staff B, RN locked the medication cart, entered the resident's room without performing hand hygiene before medication administration. Staff B, RN exited the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and complete medical records for central venous catheter dressing changes and documentation of pain scale for 3 of 51 residents sampled, Residents #71, #240, and #139. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #71's admission records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection of right lower extremity amputation stump, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol), personal history of transient ischemic attack (a brief stroke like attack) and cerebral infraction (a stroke) without residual deficits, peripheral vascular disease (a disorder that causes narrowing, blockage or spasms in the blood vessels), essential hypertension (high blood pressure), acquired absence of right leg above knee, unspecific atrial fibrillation (an irregular heartbeat), pleural effusion (fluid around the lungs due to poor pumping of the heart), infective myositis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WEDGEWOOD LANE INVESTMENTS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST28%since 01/01/2022
HOLLENBECK, DANIELIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST15%since 01/01/2022
OHAIR, JOSHUAIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST20%since 01/01/2022
ROCKEFELLER, KEVINIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST34%since 01/01/2022
MARTIN, TODDIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 01/01/2022
KR MANAGEMENT, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2022

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 4%Medicare 39%Other / private 57%

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$408per resident / day
operating cost
$12,404per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$411per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 106114. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next