Hidden Lakes Senior Living Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 111 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 24 beds and averages 20.2 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.68 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.90 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.56 to 1.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to follow the menu for 1 of 3 observed meals, as evidenced by the failure to follow the recipes for the main entree of Beef Quesadilla and the alternate entree of Savory Baked Chicken Thigh. This resulted in a food complaint by 2 of 10 sampled residents, Resident #7 and a resident who requested to be anonymous. The Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) also added mashed potatoes and gravy to the alternate meal without following their documented process.The findings included:1) Review of the policy Menus and Adequate Nutrition with a Copyright of 2025, documented in part, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: . 4. Menus will be followed as posted. Notification of any deviations from the menu shall be made as soon as practicable. Review of the policy Altering Food Recipes dated 07/08/22, documented in part, Policy: All recipe alterations must be approved by the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) before implementation. Documentation of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, sanitary conditions, and the prevention of foodborne illnesses. This had the potential to affect 18 residents who ate food by mouth. The census at the time of survey was 18. The findings included:An observation of the kitchen was conducted on 02/02/26 beginning at 10:00 AM with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM). The following findings were noted and confirmed by the CDM:a) The beverage dispenser had a brown thick liquid substance in the tray.b) A brown liquid spillage and loose dry macaroni noodles were noted on the clear plastic cover of a box in the dry storage area, that contained three cans of chicken and dumplings.c) There was an opened bag of macaroni noodles in the dry storage area.d) Food crumbs were noted along the side of the clean plastic cups stored on a three shelf rolling cart. e) There was debris and food crumbs on the floor at the side of the ovens.f) There was debris and food crumbs on the floor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the dumpster area in a clean and sanitary condition as evidenced by the failure to dispose of garbage and refuse properly. This failure had the potential to attract pests.The findings included:An observation of the dumpster area was made with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the Environmental Service Director on 02/05/26 at 10:51 AM. There were two dumpsters located at the back of the building with a wooden fence around them. On the ground in front of the fence, and inside the fence in front of each dumpster was spilled debris and food. Photographic evidence obtained. The Environmental Service Director stated, I'll get someone to clean this up.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to service food at a safe and palatable temperature for 2 of 3 sampled residents who were served milk during the lunch meal on 02/04/26, Residents #3 and #16, and as evidenced by kitchen processes resulting in resident complaints of cold food by Resident #7, #2, and #10.The findings included:1) A tray line observation was made on 02/04/26 beginning at 11:35 AM. Upon arrival in the kitchen two small open carts and two large open tray carts were noted with the resident's food trays and meal tickets set up on the four different carts. Staff E, Dietary Aide, explained one of the large carts was for the skilled nursing facility (SNF) and the other for the assisted living facility (ALF). Staff D, cook, explained one of the small carts was for the pureed meals and the other for the mechanically altered meals. The cook further explained she preferred to do all the pureed meals first, followed by the mechanically altered meals, and then the regular…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-02-05 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, menu review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared to meet the needs for 3 of 3 sampled residents observed, as evidenced by the failure to provide and serve chopped meat to Resident #2 and #21, and failure to cut up meat to bite-sized pieces for Resident #5.The kitchen staff also failed to prepare ground meat on 02/02/26 as per the mechanical soft diet menu.This failure had the potential to affect 7 residents who were on physician ordered mechanical soft diets.The findings included:1) A lunch observation was made on 02/02/26 beginning at 11:49 AM in the main dining room. The posted menu for that day included a roast beef sandwich. Four residents were brought into the dining room and were accompanied by Staff I, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), throughout the meal. The lunch trays were served to the four residents, as noted below, and staff failed to compare the meal with the corresponding meal ticket. After the meal service on 02/02/26 at approximately 12:40 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 10 sampled residents, as evidenced by the inaccurate assessment for range of motion ability, diagnoses, and terminal illness status for Resident #7, and for range of motion ability for Resident #6.The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the medical diagnosis included quadriplegia (partial or total loss of sensory and motor function in all four limbs and the torso). Review of current orders documented the resident was admitted to Hospice services as of 01/31/25. Review of the Hospice admission information revealed a physician signed the Certificate of Terminal Illness (CTI). This CTI was renewed with each certification period from admission to the present time. Review of the current Annual MDS dated [DATE] documented Resident #7 had no impairment to the lower extremities and had a documented diagnosis of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely assess, monitor, document care, and notify the physician for a resident who exhibited cold-like symptoms for 1of 1 sampled resident, Resident #2, reviewed for change of condition. In addition, the facility failed to assess and document blood pressure prior to administering antihypertensive medication as required by the physician order for 1 of 5 sampled resident, Resident #2, reviewed during the unnecessary medication review task. The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including medically complex conditions, Atrial Fibrillation, and Septicemia.The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 10/29/25 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS noted the resident reported feeling down, depressed, or hopeless, with no behavioral symptoms…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the policy and procedure, the facility failed to ensure supervision and implementation of interventions to prevent falls for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #20, which resulted in the resident sustaining 3 falls within 5 weeks.The findings included: Review of the policy titled, Fall Prevention Program dated 07/2025, documented in part, Each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls.Review of the record indicated that Resident #20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical history included Metabolic Encephalopathy (a disturbance in brain function that causes confusion), Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure), Muscle Weakness and Idiopathic Peripheral Neuropathy (nerve damage which causes pain, numbness and tingling to the lower extremities).Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to follow the physician's order for feeding tube flush and to obtain weekly weights for 1 of 1 sampled resident, Resident #6, which was required to maintain the resident's nutritional needs and prevent complications. The findings included: 1. Review of the policy and procedure titled, Care and Treatment of Feeding Tubes dated 12/2025, documented in part, Feeding tubes will be utilized according to the physician orders, which typically include: the kind of feeding and its caloric value, volume, duration, mechanism of administration, and frequency of flush.A review of the record documented Resident #6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Medical diagnoses included Chronic Dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] the resident was fed by a feeding tube. a) Review of the physician's orders documented as of 08/01/25 that Resident #6 received nutrition via a feeding tube. An…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the provision of foods as per resident preference for 2 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to ensure ice cream and mashed potatoes daily for Resident #16, and failure to ensure double portions for Resident #2.The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not done as the resident was rarely or never understood. This MDS also documented the resident was totally dependent upon staff for eating.Review of the current care plan initiated on 11/13/24 and revised on 08/26/25 documented the resident was at increased nutritional risk related to a mechanically altered diet and the need for assistance with all meals. Intervention to this care plan included to provided the diet as ordered.An observation on 02/02/26 at 12:10 PM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL