Luxe At Wellington Rehabilitation Center The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 747 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 45.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 243 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.81 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 94% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 100.5 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.85 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.88 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.53 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.97 to 0.65 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 59% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-16 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record and policy review; the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from neglect by failure of staff to respond timely to the resident's change of condition which resulted in hospitalization for 1 of 2 residents sampled for change in condition (Resident #4). The findings included: The facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Misappropriation, Mistreatment, and Injury of Unknown Origin issued 08/2022 and revised 01/2024 revealed, Neglect occurs when the facility is aware of, or should have been aware of, goods or services that a resident (s) requires but a facility fails to provide them, to the resident (s), that has resulted in or may result in physical harm, pain, mental anguish, or emotional distress. Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] post-acute care hospitalization. Diagnoses included Dysarthria following Cerebral Infarction, Encounter for Surgical Aftercare Following Surgery on the Circulatory System, Asthma, Heart Failure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards by failing to recognize one out of 2 residents sampled (Resident #5), after admission to the nursing home was not on medication for a diagnosis of Atrial Fibrillation. The resident was readmitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility post-acute care hospitalization on 03/07/25. Her admitting diagnoses included Staphylococcal Arthritis of Left Knee, Cellulitis of Left Lower Limb and Unspecified Atrial Fibrillation. Her Brief Interview for Mental Status was 15 on the 5-day Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 03/12/25. This revealed the resident had intact cognition. A review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was evaluated by a nurse practitioner (NP) on 03/07/25. The NP note revealed was found with new onset of afib/aflutter- started…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate and timely care and services for 3 of 24 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to coordinate care with a consultant physician to ensure continued administration of antibiotics for Resident #4; failure to ensure care for a skin tear to the left lower extremity of Resident #116; and failure to ensure documented blood pressure readings at the time of administration of an antihypertensive (blood pressure) medication with physician ordered parameters for Resident #116; and failure to follow physician ordered parameters for antihypertensive medications for Resident #127.The findings included:1) Review of the record revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. This same MDS documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure standards of practice for administration of medication for 1 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to ensure Resident #4 received medication as prescribed and ensure medications are refilled in a timely manner. The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of medical diagnosis documented a history of cerebral infarction with hemiparesis (stroke with paralysis on one side).During an observation of medication administration on 12/08/25 at 9:56 AM Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse prepared Eldertonic (appetite supplement) 15milliliters (ml), Levetiracetam (seizure) 500mg (1 tablet) Pantopazole (acid reflux) 40 mg (1 tablet), and Lactulose (increase ammonia level) 15grams/15ml (30ml). After pouring 30 milliliters of Lactulose in a medicine cup, Staff A handed the surveyor the medicine bottle and stated He is out of this medication. It had to be reordered. Observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with a dignified existence and communication with staff in and outside of the facility for 3 of 4 sampled residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident #6, #7 and #8). The findings included: 1). In an observation conducted on 04/16/2025 at 2:00 PM on the second floor of the facility, the surveyor noted that the nurses' station was empty. The surveyor walked around for 45 minutes and never saw a staff member. There were 40 residents on this second floor unit. 2). In an interview conducted on 04/16/2025 at 2:35 PM Resident #6's wife stated that she can never get in contact with the facility staff when she calls, she always must come to the facility if she has a question which is never answered because it seems that no one ever has an answer. Resident # 6's wife further stated that she doesn't see nurses nor CNA's (certified nursing assistants) around during her visits. Record review revealed Resident #6 was admitted on [DATE] post CVA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper indwelling urinary catheter care and services for 1 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by the failure to assess for and or attempt to discontinue the indwelling urinary catheter for Resident #1. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], after hospitalization for back surgery. Review of the hospital record revealed the indwelling urinary catheter was placed at the time of the surgery. The hospital discharge instructions lacked any documentation related to the indwelling urinary catheter. The hospital record lacked any documented attempt at removal of the device. Review of the transfer form dated 09/04/24 from the hospital documented Resident #1 had a Foley catheter (indwelling urinary catheter) in place but lacked any indication for use and lacked information as to if the hospital made an attempt to remove the device. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-13 · tag F0694 — isolated
  Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper care and services for the intravenous line for 1 of 1 sampled resident, as evidenced by the lack of dressing changes as per order for Resident #2. The findings included: Review of the policy Central Lines revised 05/2024 documented, in part, Procedure: . 2. Ensure infection control standards are maintained during the care of the central line including but not limited to: a. Change dressing routinely and per physician orders. Review of the policy Documentation revised 01/2024 documented, in part, Procedure: . 4. documentation in the medical record will be objective (not opinionated or speculative), complete, and accurate. Review of the record revealed Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the orders revealed the resident had had several peripheral IVs (intravenous access devices) placed throughout his stay at the facility, with the most recent being a midline (specific type of central…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to provide necessary care and services to ensure adequate monitoring for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2) who experienced significant changes in condition requiring hospitalization; and the facility failed to assess skin changes for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3) after skin impairments were identified and treated to ensure resolution. The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after a short hospitalization due to Hematuria. Review of the Minimum Data Set, admission assessment with reference date of [DATE], documented the resident was assessed as independent for skills of daily decision making, has an indwelling urinary catheter and was receiving anticoagulant, antibiotic and hypoglycemia medications. The resident did not receive oxygen therapy. Review of Care Plans revised on [DATE], documented the following: The resident is at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care practices to prevent excessive tension on the indwelling urinary catheter to minimize complications. The failure affected 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident #6). The findings included: Review of CDC recommendations for catheter care include the following: Properly secure catheters to prevent movement and urethral traction, maintain a sterile closed drainage system, maintain good hygiene at the catheter urethral interface, maintain unobstructed urine flow and maintain drainage bag below level of bladder at all times. Observation of catheter and wound care for Resident #6 was conducted on 10/29/24 at 9:38 AM. Staff D, a Certified Nursing Assistant, the Wound Care Nurse and the Unit Manager assisted with the provision of care. Staff D and the Wound Care Nurse prepared their supplies, performed hand hygiene and donned proper personal protective equipment. Staff D started the provision of care with the Wound Care Nurse by opening the resident's brief and turning the resident to place a pad underneath.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on policy review, record review and interview, it was determined, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses were able to demonstrate competency related to the provision of medication administration and following physician's orders. This failure affected 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #2 and #3). The findings included: 1) Clinical record review revealed Resident #3 was admitted to the facility for rehabilitation services with multiple diagnoses including Heart Failure and Hypertension on 10/07/24. Review of Physician's orders dated 10/08/24, documented Amlodipine Besylate 5 milligrams give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day, scheduled at 9 AM and 9 PM and Carvedilol Tablet 6.25 milligrams, give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for Hypertension, scheduled at 9 AM and 5 PM. The medications have prescribed parameters, hold for systolic blood pressure less than 110 or heart rate less than 60. Review of the Medication Administration Record dated 10/2024, documented Resident #3 received the prescribed medications identified above with no evidence of blood pressure monitoring…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing as evidenced by failure to provide timely administration of medications for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #50 .refer to F684); ineffective communication for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #29 and 394 (refer to F676); and numerous resident / family complaints from 13 of 31 sampled residents / representatives (Residents #394, #393, #192, #39, #66, #33, #4, #29, #193, #63, #1, #194, and #395). The findings included: 1) On 09/24/24 at 11:49 AM, Resident #50's family member was interviewed via telephone and stated that he felt [Resident #50] had declined due to not participating in therapy as much as she needed to because she was not being provided her medications in a timely manner. When she doesn't get her medications on time, it can affect her blood pressure, she becomes dizzy, and she doesn't want to get out of bed to attend therapy. A review of Resident #50's medication orders showed active orders for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 sampled residents were spoken to and cared for in a dignified manner (Residents #18, #39, and #33). The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the Resident #18 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the current orders revealed the resident had an admission order dated 08/30/24 for the use of barrier cream, a protective cream, every shift and as needed. A secondary order was written on 09/01/24 to clean the buttock with normal saline and apply zinc oxide every shift. This order was typically used when a resident has excoriation to the buttock. During an interview on 09/24/24 at 10:33 AM, when asked if she was treated with dignity and respect, Resident #18 stated with some of the staff it's like they…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$58,835 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $58,835 — penalty dated 2025-04-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 9 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL