No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

A.g. Rhodes Home Wesley Woods

1819 Clifton Road, N.e., Atlanta, GA 30329 · Non profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (404) 315-0900 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (404) 315-0900 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
1 actual-harm citation$8,018 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-07)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2512 N Druid Hills Rd NE · (470) 601-7810 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2400 N Druid Hills Rd NE · (404) 267-0061 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2490 N Druid Hills Rd NE
Park
1500 Kittredge Park Rd NE · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2512 N Druid Hills Rd NE · (404) 634-1209

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.0%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.6%5.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.1%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.0%11.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.7%3.2%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.7%15.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.8%20.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.2%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.5%5.6%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.3%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.5%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.5%78.4%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.7%25.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.6%11.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.242.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.121.901.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 338 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

66.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.18hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 124 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF66.4%CMS range 61.4–71.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 8.6–13.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge70.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge37.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting84.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge96.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.8%CMS range 4.4–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.101.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.55
RN hours/ resident / day
1.28
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.90
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.73
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
36.1%
Total nursing turnover
23.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 125.6 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.73 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.548 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.90 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.94 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Safe Elder Handling-Transfers, the facility failed to ensure that one of 25 residents (R) (R100) was safely transferred using a mechanical lift. Actual harm occurred on 1/20/2024, when R100 fell from a mechanical lift during transfer from bed to chair and sustained one left rib fracture and two right rib fractures. There were 25 residents that required transfer assistance with a mechanical lift. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Safe Elder Handling-Transfer, revised 8/28/2023 documented the policy is to ensure elders are handled and transferred safely to prevent risk for injury and provide a safe, secure, and comfortable environment. Policy Explanation: All elders require safe handling when transferred to prevent or minimize the risk for injury to themselves and the employees that assist them. Compliance Guidelines: Number 3. Mechanical lifting equipment or other approved transferring aids will be used based on the elders'…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Policy, the facility failed to assess for the ability to self-administer medications prior to leaving medications at the bedside for one of 44 sampled residents (R) (R50). The deficient practice had the potential to allow access to medications otherwise not prescribed by a physician to other residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration policy revised December 2023 indicated the following: Policy: Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other care partner who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Review of the medical record for R50 revealed diagnoses including but not limited to encephalopathy, unspecified, transient cerebral ischemic attack, unspecified, difficulty in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Preventive Maintenance, the facility failed to ensure the residents' living area was safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike in three rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]) on two of four halls (300 Hall and 400 Hall). Specifically, residents' rooms contained damaged sheetrock walls with holes, scuffed/chipped paint, and a dirty personal fan that had the potential to affect patient comfort and safety. Findings Include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment revised 7/20/2024 revealed under Intent Preventive Maintenance Program shall be developed and implemented to ensure the provision of a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff, and the public. Observation on 9/9/2025 at 8:30 am in rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] revealed, scuffed/ chipped paint and a hole in the wall. Observation on 9/9/2025 at 8:10 am in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, the facility failed to complete/update care plans for two of 44 sampled residents (R) (R40 and R3). Specifically, R3 had orders for oxygen therapy and oxygen was not on the care plan. Also, the facility failed to complete a care plan for R40 related to hearing loss and communication interventions. The deficient practice had the potential to lead to negative health outcomes and unmet care needs.Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan revised on 6/26/2023 states under Policy: It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident consistent with resident rights that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment. The policy explanation and compliance guidelines revealed: The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Accident and Supervision, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment remained free of potential accident hazards for three of 44 sampled residents (R) (R131, R122 and R48). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Accidents and Supervision revised on 6/26/2023 states under intent: The elder environment will remain free of accident hazards as is possible. Each elder will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to reduce the risks of accidents. This includes identifying hazard(s) and risk(s), evaluating and analyzing hazard(s) and risks, implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s), and monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions when necessary. The policy explanation and guideline states: The community shall establish and utilize a systematic approach to address elder risk and environmental hazards to minimize the likelihood of accidents.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Therapy, the facility failed to administer oxygen (O2) at the correct ordered setting for one of 21 residents (R) (R3) receiving O2 therapy. This deficient practice had the potential to place R3 at risk for hypoxia (low O2 levels) which could have led to adverse clinical outcomes.Findings include:Review of facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy revised May 2024 indicated the following: Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: Oxygen is administered under the orders of a physician, except in cases of an emergency. The resident's care plan shall identify the interventions for oxygen therapy, based upon the resident's assessment and orders, such as, but not limited to: The type of oxygen delivery system, When to administer, such as continuous or intermittent and/or when to discontinue, Equipment setting for the prescribed flow rates, Monitoring of SpO2 (oxygen saturation) levels and/or vital signs as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, the facility failed to document receive dates on food items in the dry storage area; failed to ensure dietary staff washed hands after entering the kitchen and between touching dirty/clean dishes; failed to discard food items past the best by date; and failed to ensure dietary staff properly sanitized dishware to prevent cross contamination. There were 134 residents consuming an oral diet. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Production, Purchasing, Storage - Food and Supply Storage revised 1/2024, revealed foods past the use by, sell by, best by, best by, or enjoy by date should be discarded. Date and rotate items; first in, first out and discard food past the use by or expiration date. Observation on 4/5/2024 at 9:15 am, the dry storage area revealed a shelf containing four, 32-ounce containers of Dijon mustard, two one-gallon containers of mayonnaise, one gallon container of balsamic dressing, one gallon container of BBQ sauce, and an eight-pound container of salsa all with no receive date.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-07 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the policy titled PASRR Program Policy, the facility failed to submit an application for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for evaluation and determination of specialized services for two of three residents (R) R65, and R116 reviewed for PASRR. R65 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. R116 was admitted with diagnoses of PTSD, schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety disorder. Findings include: Review of the policy titled PASRR Program Policy revised 6/8/2023, revealed the policy states the facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) program to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Policy Explanation and Compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, review of facility recipes, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that dietary staff followed recipes for preparing puree food items to avoid compromising the nutritive value and flavor. This affected 14 residents receiving a pureed diet. Findings include: Review of the undated recipe titled P. Chicken BBQ Quarter revealed the ingredients listed included with amount for serving of 20: Chicken BBQ Quarter 5 pounds, Chicken Broth 2 1/8 cup, and thickener 1 1/3 cup. Review of the undated recipe titled P. [NAME] White revealed the ingredients listed included amount for 48 servings: prepared white rice, vegetable broth, and thickener. During the preparation of puree food items on 4/6/2024 at 11:35 am, Dietary [NAME] FF was observed preparing puree BBQ chicken. He placed an unmeasured amount of steamed diced chicken into a standard blender bowl, then added an unmeasured amount of chicken broth and began to puree. Dietary [NAME] FF stopped the blender and added an unmeasured amount of BBQ sauce, two different times, and continued the puree process.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-19 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and policy review titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, the facility failed to assess two residents (R) R#35 and R#79 for the ability to safely self-administer medications, before leaving mediations at bedside for residents to self-administer. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, revised 4/10/19 revealed procedure 3. Patients/residents are allowed to self-administer medications when specifically authorized by the attending physician and in accordance with procedures for self-administration of medications. Procedure 4. Medications are administered at the time they are prepared. Medications are not pre-poured/pre-set/pre-crushed. Only one patient/resident's medications are prepared and administered at a time. 1. Observation on 5/17/22 at 10:36 a.m. during initial tour/screening with R#35, surveyor observed a bottle of saline nasal spray on R#35's bedside table. R#35 informed surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, interviews, and Rule 410-10-.02 Standards of Practice for Licensed Practical Nurses, the facility failed to maintain professional nursing standards of quality as evidenced by one of four Licensed Practical Nurse's (LPN) observed during facility medication administration task by presetting medications; also failed to practice infection control guidelines during medication administration and during point of care testing for two of two nurses observed. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Administration: General Guidelines, revised 4/10/19, revealed policy statement as medications are administered as prescribed, in accordance with the good nursing principles and practices. Procedure 4. Medications are administered at the time they are prepared. Medications are not pre-poured/pre-set/pre-crushed. 10. Medications are administered within 60 minutes before or after scheduled time, except for medications ordered to be taken with food and before or after meals, which are administered precisely as ordered. Unless…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent (5%). A total number of 26 medication opportunities were observed. There were three errors for one of five residents (R), R#12, by one of three nurses observed during medication pass, for a medication error rate of 11.54%. Findings include: Observation of medication administration on 5/18/22 at 9:04 a.m., with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) CC revealed she pulled a clear medicine cup containing multiple medications from the medication cart for R#12. LPN CC stated that she pre-set the medications earlier on her shift, to save time. Surveyor asked LPN CC to count the number of pills in the cup and she confirmed that was all the medications resident was to receive at that time. She then placed all the medications from the clear plastic cup in the pill crush sleeve and crushed the medications together and opened the three capsules. She combined all the crushed medications in a plastic cup with applesauce. She then prepared the liquid medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-05-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to maintain an effective Infection Control Program (ICP) to prevent the spread of infections by not disinfecting a multi-use blood glucometer (a device used to test blood sugar levels) between residents for one of two nurses observed; also failed to ensure nursing staff performed hand hygiene during medication pass for one of four nurses observed. Findings Include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Glucometer Policy Glucometer Cleaning and Disinfecting, revised 4/28/21 policy statement revealed if one device must be used to monitor several residents, it must be cleaned and disinfected after every use following the manufactures' instructions to prevent carryover of blood and infectious agents. Procedure 1. Clean and disinfect glucose meter before and after each patient use. 4. Clean and disinfect meter by using approved Germicidal and Disinfectant Wipes. Observation on 5/18/22 at 8:13 a.m. with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA, was observed to remove a glucometer from the medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-04-07
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-04 for 1 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LENNING, JUSTINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2014
LUTHER, TAMMYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
MINOR, ARIANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/07/2023
CATEAU, DEKEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2018
HELTON, MARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2019
PHANGESTU, CHRISTINAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/26/2023
WILSON, KEITHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2019
UNIDINE CORPORATIONOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/10/2025
BARRINGTON, LISAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/04/2021
BROWN, NICOLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/30/2021
FORTUNE, ROCHELLEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/22/1999
HILL, VINCENTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/23/2024
JEROME, FARRAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/07/2017
MITCHELL, DAPHNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/09/2024
PRICE, CRYSTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/08/2024
WARD, LATASHAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/11/2023
WEBSTER, SEANIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/13/2025
CARE SOLUTIONSOrganizationGENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/15/2022
AEGIS THERAPIES, INC.OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2018
AG RHODES HEALTH AND REHAB MGT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2012
AMERIS BANKOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2023
EMORY UNIVERSITYOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007
EP WEALTH ADVISORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2003
HARMON PHYSICAL PLANT CONSULTING LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/13/2021
MAULDIN & JENKINS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2011
PRUITTHEALTH INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2007
WASHBURNE DIALYSIS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
OH, HYUNG SEOKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2007

CMS files one row per role, so the 42 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$19.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+5.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$900K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 16%Other / private 84%

This home reported $900K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$375per resident / day
operating cost
$11,414per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$396per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115002. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next