Crestview Health & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 388 beds and averages 303.7 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 84 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.71 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.10 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.56 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.42 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.83 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.07 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2026-03-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate action was taken to prevent abuse for seven of 25 residents (R) reviewed for abuse related to (1) allegations of sexual abuse to R9 and R20 by R10; (2) an allegation of sexual abuse to R8 by R7; (3) an allegation of physically abusive to R23 by R22; (4) an allegation of abuse to R2 by R3; (5) an allegation of abuse to R5 by R4; (6) an allegation of abuse to R1 by nurse aide (NA) 51. The facility's failure to ensure no further abuse was perpetrated created the potential for residents to be, or to continue to be, abused, leading to serious physical and/or psychological harm for each resident.On 2/26/2026, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.On 2/26/2026 at 5:30 pm, the Administrator was notified that Immediate…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy, record review, and resident, family, and staff interviews, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of allegations of abuse for 15 of 25 residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R13, R20, R21, R22 and R23) reviewed for abuse. The facility's failure to ensure that thorough investigations of abuse were conducted created the potential for residents to be, or to continue to be, abused, leading to serious physical and/or psychological harm for each resident.On 2/26/2026, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.On 2/26/2026 at 5:30 pm, the Administrator was notified that Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified to have existed on 10/19/2025, when R9 made an allegation that a male resident, R10, sexually abused her by touching her in between her legs on that date.An Acceptable…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility's administration failed to implement the abuse policies and procedures for 15 of 25 sampled residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, R8, R9, R10, R13, R20, R21, R22, and R23) reviewed for abuse. The facility's failure to implement its Abuse Policy placed all residents at risk of unreported and uninvestigated abuse. On 2/26/2026, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.On 2/26/2026 at 5:30 pm, the Administrator was notified that Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified to have existed on 10/19/2025, when R9 made an allegation that a male resident, R10, sexually abused her by touching her in between her legs on that date.An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 3/1/2026. Based on observation, record review, a review of facility policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, and staff interviews, it was validated that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-01 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications were not given before informed consent or risk versus benefits for three of eight residents (R) (R11, R12, and R13) reviewed for psychotropic medications. This failure had the potential for ordered psychotropic medications provided without evidence of informed consent, which included treatment goals, benefits vs risks, and adverse reactions to treatment. Findings included:1. A review of R11's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia with behavioral disturbances and adjustment disorder with disturbance of emotions and conduct. A review of R11's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/3/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated R11 was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-01 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
  Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and family and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate social services assistance was provided for one of 25 sampled residents (R) (R18). The facility's failure to ensure the provision of social services assistance for R18 created the potential for this and other residents to experience harm related to having unmet psychosocial needs.Findings included: A review of R18's admission Record, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Admissions Tab, indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of quadriplegia and idiopathic hypotension.A review of R18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/2025, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. A review of R18's Care Planning Progress Notes, dated 7/9/2025, indicated, Care Plan meeting held with IDT…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Procedures, the facility failed to protect residents from resident to resident physical abuse for two of four sampled residents (R) (R5 and R4). Specifically, R5 was hit by R4. Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Procedures with a revision date of 12/5/2025 revealed under Policy: It is the policy of the facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of residents property. Under Definition: Physical Abuse includes, but not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Under Prevention of Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation: .B. Identifying, correcting, and intervening in situations in which abuse , neglect, exploitation, and/or misappropriation of resident property is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedures, the facility failed to protect residents from misappropriation of property for one resident (R) (R3) by not ensuring that R3's gold teeth were placed in a secure location. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Policy and Procedures dated and revised December 5,2022 revealed under Policy: it is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of residents property. Under Definitions: Misappropriation of Resident property means means the deliberate misplacement, exploitation, or wrongful, temporary or permanent, use of a resident's belongings or money, without the resident's consent. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: A.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident family and staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (including AMA 'against medical advice'), the facility failed to provide a 30-day notice to three of seven sampled residents (R) (R3, R6, and R7) or their representatives before they were discharged from the facility. Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) with original date of October 2017, Revised January 2024, revealed under Policy: It is the policy of the facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility, except in limited circumstances. Under Procedure: .4. The Facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand.5. Generally, the notice must be provided at least 30 days prior to a facility-initiated transfer or discharge of residents.1. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Minimum Data set MDS Completion, the facility failed to complete accurate MDS assessments for three of seven sampled Residents (R1, R2, and R7). The deficient practice had the potential for R1, R2, and R7's care needs to go unmet.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data set MDS Completion dated October 2024, revised July 2025 revealed under Policy: It is the policy of this facility that residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process in order to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan.1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to dysarthria following unspecified cerebrovascular disease, and other secondary parkinsonism.Review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure adequate meal portions as outlined on the menu for the regular texture and puree texture meals. This failure placed 226 residents who received a regular or pureed diet, out of 305 total residents, at risk for weight loss, nutritional problems, and dissatisfaction with their meals. Findings include: Review of the undated Diet Order Tally Report, provided by the facility on 06/05/25, revealed there were 186 residents who received a regular diet and 40 residents who received a pureed diet. Review of the undated Week 3 Thursday lunch menu, provided by the facility revealed the menu called for: -4 ounces (oz) of green beans for the regular texture meals; -4 oz. pureed turkey for the puree texture meals; -4 oz. pureed green beans for the puree texture meals; and -4 oz. pureed stuffing (replaced with rice pilaf) for the puree texture meals. During observation of lunch meal service in the kitchen on 06/05/25 beginning at 11:20 AM, [NAME] (CK) 1 stated she was serving 4 ounces (oz.) of green…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the call device was accessible for one of 41 residents (Resident (R) 286) observed for call light accessibility in the Initial Pool. This failure placed R286 at risk of accident, injury, or unmet needs related to an inability to call for staff assistance. Findings include: Review of R286's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R286's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/23/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she scored six out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating severely impaired cognition. R286 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living, bed mobility, transfers, and locomotion. She experienced a fall with no injury. Review of R286's Care Plan, dated 05/10/25 and located under the Care Plan tab of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a splint was applied to address a hand contracture for one of one resident (Resident (R) 6) reviewed for limited range of motion out of a total sample of 39. This failure had the potential to lead to increased contracture, pain, or skin breakdown for R6. Findings include: Review of R6's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including dementia and adult failure to thrive. Review of R6's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date of 04/30/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R6 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and was assessed by staff with severely impaired cognition. R6 had limited range of motion in both upper extremities. Review of R6's Care Plan, dated 08/01/24, revealed, Restorative care related to (contractures,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medical record reflected accurate medication administration times for one of 39 sample residents (Resident (R) 157). This failure had the potential to lead to missed or late doses of insulin, which could cause hyperglycemia or other complications. Findings include: Review of R157's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of diabetes. Review of R157's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/15/25, revealed he received insulin daily. Review of R157's Care Plan, located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed, [R157] has a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (insulin dependent). The approaches included, Diabetes medication as ordered by doctor. Monitor/document for side effects and effectiveness. Review of R157's Medication Administration Record, dated June 2025 and located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in GA