No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Parkside At Budd Terrace Operating Company LLC

1833 Clifton Road, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 250 certified beds · (404) 728-6500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (404) 728-6500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0607, F0609) — most recent Apr 2026
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (63%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1520 Avenue Pl · (800) 746-7287 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1520 Avenue Pl · (404) 639-5575 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.3 mi
1799 Briarcliff Rd NE · (404) 607-1189 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Emory Clinic, 1525 Clifton Rd NE · (404) 727-6532 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1810 Briarcliff Rd NE · (404) 320-1900

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.4%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight13.1%5.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms10.2%11.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication6.6%20.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.7%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.0%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.1%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine33.2%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.1%25.0%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%11.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.882.151.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.481.901.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 232 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
59.7%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.60U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.27hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 59.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 263 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.0%CMS range 61.5–75.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 8.5–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge59.7%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.1–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
1.11
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
63.3%
Total nursing turnover
71.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 250 beds and averages 230.7 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.48 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.93 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.70 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-08)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2025-05-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-08 · tag F0640 — widespread
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were completed and transmitted to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 14 days of completion for seven resident (Resident (R) 56, 204, 248, 425, 426, 457 and 459) out of seven residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure prevented the transmission of resident-specific information used for payment, quality measures, and ongoing clinical data analysis. Findings include:Review of the RAI Manual revealed, Policy interpretation and implementation: Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required MDS assessments are federally mandated and therefore must be performed for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing homes. OBRA assessments include Discharge assessment are mandatory CMS RAI manual tracking records (discharge return anticipated or not anticipated) completed with a resident leaves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure 32 out of 33 Agency Nurses and 83 out of 83 in-house staff nurses were competent to provide Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) related care and services to residents residing in the facility, including one Resident (R) R311 of two residents in the facility receiving TPN. The facility's failure to ensure nursing staff was competent related to the administration of TPN created the potential residents to experience a decline in physical status. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Competency Evaluation Policy dated April 2025 indicated, It is the policy of this facility to evaluate each employee to assure they meet appropriate competencies and skills for performing their job; and Competency: is a measurable pattern of knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors and other characteristics that an individual needs to perform work roles or occupational functions successfully; and 1. The knowledge and skills required among staff to meet residents' needs are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure informed consent was obtained for the use of psychotropic medications for one (Resident (R) R49) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. The deficient practice created the potential for this and other residents to receive medication not necessary or desired related to their psychiatric/mental health care. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated April 2025 indicated under Policy, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advance directives.Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team and staff responsible for the resident's care. Review of R49's admission Record dated 03/23/2026 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, record review, and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident record reflected the correct code status for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for one (Resident (R) R49) out of five residents reviewed for advance directive in the sample of 63 residents. The facility's failure to ensure R49's record accurately reflected her chosen code status created the potential for CPR to not be performed as requested for this and other residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives dated [DATE] indicated under Policy, It is the policy of this facility to support and facilitate a resident's right to request, refuse and/or discontinue medical or surgical treatment and to formulate advance directives.Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical record and communicated to the interdisciplinary team and staff responsible for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident (R) R49) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication was free from unnecessary medications. The facility's failure to ensure R49 was free from unnecessary chemical restraints created the potential for this and other residents to receive medication not necessary or desired related to their psychiatric/mental health care. Findings include:Review of R49's admission Record dated 03/23/2026 in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bipolar disorder, depression, anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Review of R49's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/2026 in the EMR under the MDS tab revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS under section N, Medications, indicated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0638 — isolated
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments not less than once every 3 months, for one resident (Resident (R) 56) out of seven residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 63 residents. This failure prevented the transmission of resident-specific information used for payment, quality measures, and ongoing clinical data analysisFindings include:Review of the RAI Manual indicated, Policy interpretation and implementation: Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required MDS assessments are federally mandated and therefore must be performed for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing homes. OBRA assessments include Quarterly Assessments. A quarterly assessment must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessment to ensure critical indicators of gradual change in a resident's status are monitored.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete a base line care plan for three (Residents (R)98, R99, and R198) of 63 sampled residents reviewed for base line care plans. The failure had the potential to affect the residents' medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs not being met.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Baseline Care Plan dated December 2024 revealed, The facility will develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care. The baseline care plan will: Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission.1. Review of R98's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab revealed an admission date of 12/12/2025. Review of the EMR located under the Evaluation tab revealed no documentation that R98's base line care plan had been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to develop person-centered, comprehensive care plans with measurable goals and interventions for one resident (Resident (R) 162) of one resident reviewed for care plans out of a sample of 63 residents. The failure placed R162 at risk for skin breakdown due to incomplete and/or inconsistent care to prevent pressure ulcers. Findings include:Review of the RAI Manual dated October 2025 located at www.cms.gov/files/document/final-mds-3-0-rai-manual-v1-20-1-october-2025.pdf, indicated, . The RAI process, which includes the Federally mandated MDS, is the basis for an accurate assessment of nursing home residents. The MDS information and the CAA (Care Area Assessment) process provide the foundation upon which the care plan is formulated. After completing the MDS and CAA portions of the comprehensive assessment, the next step is to evaluate the information gained through both assessment processes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure services were provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (Resident (R)15) of 63 residents sampled. Specifically, nursing staff failed to follow physician's orders for nephrostomy tube site care. The deficient practices placed the resident at risk for infection and compromised skin integrity.Findings include:1.Review of R15's electronic medical record (EMR admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bilateral nephrostomy tubes, and history of urinary tract infections.Review of R15's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/13/2026 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated R15's cognition was moderately impaired. The MDS indicated that R15 had an indwelling urinary device (nephrostomy tubes).Review of R15'sphysician's orders located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care, specifically bathing services, in accordance with the residents' needs and the facility's established schedule for three (Residents (R) 306, 76 and 299) of 12 residents reviewed for bathing in the sample of 63 residents, placing the residents at risk for poor hygiene and decreased quality of life.Findings include: 1.Review of R306's electronic medical record (EMR) admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospitalization related to a rotator cuff tear and diagnoses of right knee pain, quadriplegia, muscle wasting, and chronic pain syndrome. Review of R306's EMR admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/10/2026 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated R306 was cognitively intact. Review of R306's Care Plan under the Care Plan tab of the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide an ongoing activity program to meet the individual interests and needs to enhance the quality of life for two of two residents (Residents (R) 349 and R299) reviewed for activities out of a total sample of 63 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to negatively affect the quality of life for the affected residents. Findings include: Review of a facility's policy titled Activities dated April 2025 indicated, . It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Activities will encourage both independence and interaction within the community. 1. Review of R349's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure splints were consistently applied for two Residents (R)11 and R299) out of three residents reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility's failure to ensure splints were applied consistently as ordered for these residents created the potential for the residents to experience a decline in range of motion (ROM). Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Prevention of Decline in Range of Motion dated April 2025 indicated, Residents who enter the facility without limited range of motion will not experience a reduction in range of motion unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrated that a reduction in range of motion is unavoidable. 1. Review of R11's admission Record dated 03/23/2026 and located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of history of stroke,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an admission weight was obtained for one resident (Resident (R) 224) out of eight residents reviewed for nutrition. The failure to obtain an initial baseline weight for residents could cause the facility to not accurately determine weight loss or gain during the resident's stay. Findings include:Review of a facility's policy titled Weight Monitoring dated April 2025 indicated, . weight can be a useful indicator of nutritional status. A comprehensive nutritional assessment will be completed upon admission on residents to identify those at risk for unplanned weight loss/gain or compromised nutritional status' Assessments should include the following information.Weight. Review of R224's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record indicated the resident was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease.Review of R224's EMR titled Weights located under the Wts (Weights) & Vitals tab failed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident and staff interviews, review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure two Resident (R) R76 and R311 out of three residents reviewed for Intravenous (IV) Nutrition (i.e., Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN)) received appropriate care related to the administration of their TPN. The facility's failure to ensure appropriate administration of TPN for R76 and R311 created the potential for these residents to experience a decline in physical status. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) dated December 2024 indicated, The facility may administer and monitor residents receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN) consistent with current standards of practice.Definition: Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) is a nutrient solution, including lipids, that is administered through a central venous access device. This solution usually consists of proteins, carbohydrates, electrolytes, vitamins, trace minerals, and lipids (as directed) .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure bed rails were necessary and a consent was obtained prior to the use of bed rails for two (Residents (R)11 and R299) out of eight residents reviewed for accident hazards in the sample of 63 residents. The facility's failure to ensure bed rails were necessary for these residents created the potential for these and other residents to experience potential negative outcomes such as becoming entrapped in bed rails.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails or Enabler Bar dated April 2025 indicated, It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails and/or the use of an enabler bar. Appropriate alternative approached are attempted prior to installing or using bed rails or an enabler bar.Informed consent from the resident or resident representative must be obtained (prior to use of the bed rails) .Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were four errors from 26 opportunities for one of eight residents (R) (R311) observed, for a medication error rate of 15.38 percent. The facility's failure to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent created the potential for R311 to experience negative physical effects related to medication errors. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration dated January 2025 indicated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection.Ensure the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. Right Resident, b. Right drug, c. Right dosage, d. Right route, e. Right time, f. Right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R) (R311) out of eight residents reviewed for medication errors was free from a significant medication error. The facility's failure to ensure that R311 was free from significant medication errors created the potential for the resident to experience negative physical effects related to the medication errors. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration dated 01/2025 indicated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection.Ensure the six rights of medication administration are followed: a. Right Resident, b. Right drug, c. Right dosage, d. Right route, e. Right time, f. Right documentation. Review of R311's admission Record dated 03/27/2026 in the Electronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for one (Resident (R)311) of eight residents observed during medication administration. Specifically, the nurse administering the resident's medications failed to sanitize her hands and change her gloves after administering oral and inhaled medications, and before administering medication through a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. The facility's failure to ensure proper infection control during medication administration created the potential for cross-contamination and infection. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration dated 01/2025 indicated, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and the facility's policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, the facility failed to ensure the residents' living area was safe, clean, and comfortable in four of 165 rooms (Rm 515, RM [ROOM NUMBER], RM [ROOM NUMBER], and RM [ROOM NUMBER]). The facility also failed to ensure the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) unit filters were free of buildup and debris and failed to ensure that a broken mirror was not stored on the floor in one of six Central bath areas. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Safe and Homelike Environment, revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will create and maintain, to the extent possible, a homelike environment that emphasizes the institutional character of the setting. 3. Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment. Initial screening observation on 5/27/2025 at 8:10 am in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Coordination with PASAAR Program, the facility failed to provide Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II for two of six residents (R) (R54 and R75) with qualifying diagnoses. Findings include: Review of the facility undated policy titled, Coordination with PASAAR Program revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. All applicants to this facility will be screened for serios mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. 5b. The Level II resident review must be completed within 40 calendar days of admission. Record Review revealed R54 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of but not limited to bipolar disorder current episode, aphasia, major depressive disorder, epilepsy, anxiety disorder. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that R54 has Brief Interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure ADL care was provided for three of 59 sampled residents (R) (R36, R61, and R75) related to not receiving showers/baths, fingernails care and ADLs care. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) indicated, The facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: 1. Bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. 1. Review of R36's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Resident Self-Administration of Medications and Medication Storage, the facility failed to adequately assess two of 59 sampled residents (R) (R56 and R515) for self-administration of medication; failed to ensure one room was free from accident hazards. Specifically, medication was found in an unoccupied room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) on the second floor. The deficient practice had the potential to cause serious safety issues for residents, staff and visitors. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled Resident Self-Administration of Medications documented under the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section revealed, 1. Each resident if offered the opportunity to self-administer medication during the routine assessment by the facility's interdisciplinary team (IDT). 2. Resident's preference will be documented on the appropriate form and placed in the medical chat. 3. When determining…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff, resident, and resident family interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure physician orders for oxygen (O2) therapy were followed for two of eight residents (R) (R43 and R564) receiving oxygen. The deficient practice had the potential to cause abnormal respiratory function and adverse clinical outcomes. Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled Oxygen Concentrator revealed under Section four, Use of Concentrator, subsection (a) The nurse shall verify the physician's orders for the rate of flow and route of administration of oxygen (e.g., mask, nasal cannula). Subsection (g) Plug in the unit, turn it on to the prescribed flow rate, and assess for proper functioning. 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R43 was admitted to the facility with pertinent diagnoses including, but not limited to COVID-19, chronic pulmonary edema, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Pain Management, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain management for two of 59 sampled residents (R) (R371 and R43). Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Pain Management revealed the Policy stated, The facility must ensure that pain management is provided to residents who require such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' goals and preferences. The Pain Assessment section included, 2. c. Asking the patient to rate the intensity of his/her pain using a numerical scale, a verbal or visual descriptor that is appropriate and preferred by the resident. 1. Review of R371's admission Record revealed R371 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified fracture of shaft or tight femur (thigh bone), fracture of right pubis (pelvis bone),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were five errors from 40 opportunities observed for a medication error rate of 7.5 percent. This deficient practice had the potential to place resident (R) R12 at risk of medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings Include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Administration, revealed the Policy section included, Medications are administered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Observation on 5/28/2025 at 9:36 am of medication pass with Registered Nurse (RN) GG revealed R12's prescribed medications included losartan potassium 50 milligrams (mg)(a medication used to treat high blood pressure), Flonase 50 micrograms (mcg) (a medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights & Responsibilities, the facility failed to ensure call lights were answered and care provided for one of three residents (R) (R1). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R1 care needs were met after the initiation of the call light system. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights & Responsibilities dated September 28, 2023, under the Purpose statement revealed, [Facility Name] respects the rights of the patients / residents; recognizes that each patient / resident is an individual with unique healthcare needs, values, and cultural perspectives; and because of the importance of respecting each patient's / resident's personal dignity, provide considerate, respectful care focused on the patient's / resident's needs. Review of R1's admission Record revealed diagnoses of but not limited to unspecified osteoarthritis, other chronic pain, asthma,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights & Responsibilities, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (R) (R1) the choice of time and preference for showers. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights & Responsibilities dated September 28, 2023, under the Purpose statement revealed, [Facility Name] respects the rights of the patients / residents; recognizes that each patient / resident is an individual with unique healthcare needs, values, and cultural perspectives; and because of the importance of respecting each patient's / resident's personal dignity, provide considerate, respectful care focused on the patient's / resident's needs. Under the section titled, Patients / Residents of [Facility Name] are entitled to the rights listed below revealed, number 10. Make informed decisions regarding his / her care. Review of R1's admission Record revealed diagnoses of but not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, the facility failed to follow professional standards of care for one of 26 Residents (R) (R134). Specifically, the facility failed to transfer a physician ordered medication to the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system and to the Medication Administration Record (MAR). Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration dated September 28, 2023, revealed under Purpose revealed, Medications are administered as ordered by licensed nurses, or other staff who are legally authorized to do so in this state, as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice, in a manner to prevent contamination or infection. Further review, under the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, Number 17. Sign MAR after administered . Review of R134's undated admission record located in the resident's EMR under the Profile tab revealed R134 was admitted with diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Verbal Orders, the facility failed to ensure a telephone order for one of 31 sampled Residents (R) (R290) were transcribed into the Electronic Medication Administration Record (EMAR) system which resulted in R290 not receiving the physician ordered medication. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Physician Verbal Orders, dated 9/28/2023, under the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, Number three Enter the order into the medical record electronically. Review of R290's undated admission Record located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R290 was admitted with diagnosis that included dementia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/11/2023 revealed R290 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six out of 15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. Review of the Consultation Initial Visit note located in the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Fall Prevention and Fall Management, the facility failed to ensure a resident that required two-person assistance received adequate supervision during activities of daily living (ADL) care for one of four Residents (R) (R231) reviewed for accidents. This failure resulted in R231 falling from bed to the floor, sustaining neck pain and being transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Prevention dated 9/28/2023, provided by the facility, stated, . Ensure that the resident's care plan addresses her [sic] fall risk . Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Management dated 9/28/2023, provided by the facility, stated, . If you're with a resident as he [sic] falls, try to break his fall with your body and gently guide him to the floor . Review of the Progress Notes dated 10/28/2023, located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Progress Notes tab revealed, CNA [certified nurses' aide] called writer to the room Upon arrival writer noted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Management, the facility staff failed to maintain proper storage of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) mask when not in use for one of one Resident (R) (R134) reviewed for oxygen use. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Management, dated September 28, 2023, under the Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, Number 5. (e) Keep delivery devices covered in plastic bag when not in use. Review of R134's undated admission record located in the resident's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R134 was admitted with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of R134's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/8/2023, located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab, revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated R134 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Rooms and Medication Carts, the facility staff failed to store physician ordered medications in a locked compartment when unattended for two of six medication carts in the facility. The facility census was 118. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage Rooms and Medication Carts dated September 28, 2023, revealed [Name of Facility] does not have medication storage rooms nor does the facility use medication carts on post-acute floors (6, and 7); however, it does use medication carts on long-term care floors (3 and 5). The facility has Omnicell cabinets which are the facility's automated medication dispensing system . During an observation on 12/21/2023 at 12:57 am, the sixth-floor medication cart was observed to have the following medications in unlocked drawers: Lactulose one (1) grams/(per) 15 ml (milliliter); 11 lancets used to perform fingerstick for blood sugars; and three Admelog (fast acting insulin) 100 units/ml and insulin syringe filled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, review of the policy titled Reporting Abuse Allegations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the Abuse Policy and Procedures were current and implemented, which had the potential to affect all residents. Substandard Quality of Care was identified related to Develop/Implement Abuse/Neglect Policies.The census was 115. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Reporting Abuse Allegations effective 11/28/2016 revealed that POLICY: The facility shall ensure that all allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source, and misappropriation of resident property, are reported to the facility's administrator AND to the State Survey Agency (SSA) immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury; or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury. [sic] The Regulatory guidance provided by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based record review, staff interview, review of the Administrator Job Description, review of grievance files and Resident Council meeting minutes for 2023, facility Administration failed to ensure there was an up-to-date and effective Abuse Prevention Program, that consistently reported allegations of abuse by residents to the State Survey Agency (SSA) and that all staff were educated utilizing the most current Center for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) regulations. The census was 115. The findings include: Review of the job description titled Administrator with a revision date of 1/2021 revealed Resident Rights the Administrator should know and respects patient's rights, report allegations of patient abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of patient property. Staff Development communicates new Policy and Procedures and regulations to staff to ensure compliance. Administrator Responsibilities ensures that facility operations comply with local, state, and federal standards, laws and licensing and certifying bodies. Oversee completion of forms, reports, etc. including State…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of the policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) and QAPI minutes, the facility failed to have a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that effectively identified, developed, implemented, and monitored corrective action plans related to Abuse Prevention Policy and Procedure and to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA). The census was 115. The findings include: Review of the facility Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) policy, revised 5/1/23, revealed Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 3. Data analysis-a. The facility draws data from multiple sources, including input from all staff, residents, families, and others as appropriate. This data is reported to the QAPI Committee. An interview and discussion with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 9/29/23 at 12:10 p.m. revealed that the QAPI committee meets monthly and included the Administrator, DON, Director of Therapy, Director of Environmental Services, Director of Activities, Director of Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that allegations of abuse were reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for three of 11 sampled residents (R) (R A, R5, and R12). The findings include: 1. Review of clinical record for R A revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (CVA) with left sided hemiplegia, chronic urinary tract infections (UTI), dementia, anxiety, depression, seizure disorder, chronic pain syndrome and borderline personality disorder. Review of the Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs) care and always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The resident was assessed on admission with a feeding tube, at risk for development of pressure ulcers, although with no current wounds, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was developed for ostomy care for one resident (R) B of 22 sampled residents. The findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed that R B was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnoses including history of a small bowel obstruction and ostomy, decreased mobility post cervical surgery and infection, and Parkinson's Disease. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was assessed with an ostomy in Section H-Bowel, and for a [NAME] Catheter for Intravenous (IV) antibiotic infusion. Review of the resident's care plan revised 8/1/2023 revealed there was no evidence of development for focus areas addressing resident's colostomy or the [NAME] catheter. Interview on 9/26/2023 at 11:15 a.m. with R B revealed the resident was in bed, with a neck brace in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.4M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-60.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 7%Other / private 93%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$517per resident / day
operating cost
$15,712per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$322per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115682. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next