No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Perimeter Rehabilitation Suites By Harborview

5470 Meridian Mark Road, Bldg E, Atlanta, GA 30342 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 240 certified beds · (404) 256-5131 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Mar 2026Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567)4 immediate-jeopardy citations$201,403 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602, F0606) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
  • inspectors cited 4 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $201,403 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-17)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1100 Johnson Ferry Rd Ste 200 · (404) 257-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4535 Roswell Rd · (404) 236-0838 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
4405 Roswell Rd NE
Park
700 Loridans Dr NE · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4400 Peachtree Dunwoody Rd NE · (404) 261-3121

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-02, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-02 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased1.9%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.1%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms52.8%11.3%6.5%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.6%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.6%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication17.8%20.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine77.7%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.6%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control5.4%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.3%19.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine48.0%78.4%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.9%25.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.5%11.6%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.572.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.061.901.80worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

50.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

50.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
42.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.15U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 42.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 11% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF50.7%CMS range 40.8–60.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 8.6–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge42.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge53.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge34.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.6–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.73
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.19
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
55.4%
Total nursing turnover
46.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 215.2 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 25 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.08 on weekdays — 28% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
27
at the previous standard inspection (2025-06-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

56 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and a review of the policy titled Elopements and Wandering Residents, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for one of 52 sampled residents (R) (R49) related to ensuring that R49's unit was secure to prevent elopement. On 12/18/2025, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents.On 12/18/2025 at 3:15 pm, the Administrator, Director of Nursing, [NAME] President of Operations, and Chief Compliance Officer were notified that IJ was identified to have existed on 7/1/2025, when Resident (R) (R49) eloped from the facility by exiting the second-floor secured unit. It was determined that the alarms and the delayed egress paddle door were not functioning properly.An Acceptable Removal Plan was received on 12/19/2025. Based on observation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R124) with sufficient fluid intake via gastric tube feeding to maintain proper hydration and health. As a result, R124 was admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE] and died on [DATE] from septic shock, hypoxic respiratory failure, and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction. On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F692, F710, and F835 on [DATE] at 3:00 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on [DATE]. Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of the facility's policies as outlined in the Credible Allegation of Compliance, it was validated that the corrective plans and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-17 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the physician failed to assess laboratory orders for routine monitoring for two of 48 sampled residents (R) (R124 and R213).On 6/2/2025, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F692, F710, and F835 on 6/2/2025 at 3:00 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 4/2/2025. Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of the facility's policies as outlined in the Credible Allegation of Compliance, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice were removed on 6/4/2024.Findings included:1. Record review of the Physician Visits and Physician Delegation Policy dated 3/1/2022 and revised on 3/1/2025. Policy: It is the policy of this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2025-06-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the interview and record review, the facility's previous Director of Nursing (DON) failed to administer the facility in a manner that enabled the use of resources effectively and efficiently to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R124). The facility's systemic failure to notify R124's physician of abnormal laboratory results, assess, and provide R124 with sufficient intravenous (IV) fluids, interventions/fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health, placed the resident at risk. On [DATE], a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation caused or had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator was informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) for F692, F710, and F835 on [DATE] at 3:00 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on [DATE]. Based…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one of nine sampled residents (R) (R122) reviewed for accident hazards. Harm was identified to have occurred on 4/23/2025 when R122 sustained an injury of unknown origin resulting in ecchymosis and swelling around the right periorbital area.Findings included:A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R122 revealed an original admission date of 7/26/2022 with multiple diagnosis of, but not limited to, diffuse traumatic brain injury with loss of consciousness (TBI) systemic lupus erythematosus, traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage without loss of consciousness, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, hypotension, type ii diabetes mellitus, restlessness and agitation, dysphagia, and personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA).A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R122 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive Care Plan for four of four residents (Resident (R) 13, R29, R114, and R242) reviewed for activities and one of four residents (R117) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR). The Care Plan failed to address activity needs and interventions for R13, R29, R114, and R242 and failed to address a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and related interventions. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet physical and psychosocial care needs and the inability to meet their maximum practicable level of functioning.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 03/01/2025, revealed, The care planning process will include an assessment of the resident's strengths and needs . and incorporate culturally competent and trauma-informed care as indicated . All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-19 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure five of six residents (Resident (R) 11, R13, R29, R190, and R204) reviewed for bed rails out of 196 residents who used bed rails were assessed for safety with and need for bed rails before their use. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk of injury or entrapment related to bed rail use.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Rail Safety dated 03/01/25, revealed, As part of the resident's comprehensive assessment, the following components will be considered when determining the resident's needs, and whether or not the use of bed rails meets those needs: a. Medical diagnosis, conditions, symptoms, and/or behavioral symptoms; b. Size and weight; c. Sleep habits; d. Medication(s); e. Acute medical or surgical interventions; f. Underlying medical conditions; g. Existence of delirium; h. Ability to toilet self safely; i. Cognition; j. Communication; k.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident, resident guardian and staff interviews, record review, facility policy review, and review of the facility's investigation, the facility failed to ensure three residents (Resident (R) 35, R236, and R5) out of five residents reviewed for abuse were free from abuse out of 51 total residents sampled. R236 crawled into bed with R35 and began to kiss her. In addition, R5 was verbally abused and threatened by a Resident Care Aide (RCA)1. This had the potential for R5 to suffer emotional and psychological harm (Cross Reference F607, F609, F610).Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 07/15/2025 indicated . Instances of abuse of all residents, irrespective of any mental or physical condition, cause physical harm, pain or mental anguish. It includes verbal abuse, sexual abuse, physical abuse, and mental abuse including abuse facilitated or enabled through the use of technology. Sexual Abuse is non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies for capacity to consent for sexual activity for two residents (Resident (R) 35 and R236), of five, out of 51 sampled residents sampled. In addition, the facility failed to implement their abuse policies by failing to immediately separate both residents and implement supervision. This had the potential for on-going sexual contact. (Refer to F600)Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 07/15/2025 indicated . The facility will implement policies and procedures to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation that achieves.Establishing a safe environment that supports, to the extent possible, a resident's consensual sexual relationship and by establishing policies and protocols for preventing sexual abuse. This may include identifying when, how, and by whom determinations of capacity to consent to a sexual contact will be made and where this documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was reported timely to the Administrator and to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for two of five residents (Resident (R) 35 and R236) reviewed for abuse out of 51 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents being abused. Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation dated 07/15/2025 indicated .Reporting of all alleged violations, regardless of residents cognitive status, to the Administrator, state agency.regardless of cognitive status.and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes.Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse.1. Review of R35's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the facility admitted the resident on 09/05/2024.2. Review of R236's EMR titled admission Record located under the Profile tab indicated the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide the resident's responsible party a written notice of transfer, notice of bed hold practices and complete information on the process to appeal the transfer, including appeal agency contact information for a sample of two of two residents (Resident (R)144 and R238) reviewed for hospitalizations in a total sample of 51 residents. This failure had the possibility to negatively impact residents and their responsible parties due to them not being aware of the reason for a transfer and how to appeal the transfer. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) reviewed 11/01/2025 indicated, .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:.2. Once admitted , the resident has the right to remain in the facility unless their transfer or discharge meets one of the following specified exemptions: a. The transfer.is necessary for the resident's welfare and the resident's needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate and ongoing program of activities to meet the needs of one of four residents (Resident (R) 29) reviewed for activities who was dependent on staff for all stimulation and engagement. This failure placed R29 at risk for increased self-injurious behaviors and unmet psychosocial needsFindings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities, dated 01/01/2026, revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Facility-sponsored group, individual, and independent activities will be designed to meet the interests of each resident, as well as support their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being.Review of R29's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed he was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0680 — isolated
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Activities Director (AD) Job Description, the facility failed to ensure that a qualified activity professional was employed. This deficient practice had the potential to affect the 210 residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: Review of a document provided by the facility titled Activities Director job description, undated indicated . The activities program must be directed by a qualified professional who is.a qualified therapeutic recreation specialist or an activities professional who.licensed or registered, if applicable, by the state in which practicing.Eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or as an activities professional by a recognized accrediting body on or after October 1, 1990.Has 2 years of experience in a social or recreational program within the last 5 years.one of which was full-time in a therapeutic activities program.qualified occupational therapist or occupational therapy assistant.Has completed a training course approved by the State. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure emergency tracheostomy care supplies were kept within close proximity for one of four residents (Resident (R) 243) reviewed for tracheostomy care. This deficient practice had the potential to place R243 at risk of going without oxygen for over two minutes in the event of tracheostomy failure, which could lead to oxygen deprivation and brain damage. Findings include:Review of Anoxic Brain Injury: How Long Can the Brain Survive Without Oxygen, accessed on 03/23/26 at https://www.spinalcord.com/anoxic-brain-injury#:~:text=How%20Long%20Can%20the%20Brain,the%20potential%20long%2Dterm%20harm, revealed, two minutes without oxygen often leads to the beginning of brain cell damage, loss of consciousness, and cognitive impairment. While one minute may only cause dysfunction, by two to three minutes, brain cells begin to die, making it a critical emergency. Severe, irreversible damage is highly likely around five minutes.Review of R243's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of one Resident (R) (R43) reviewed for the provision of dental services was provided with routine services out of a survey sample of 51. This deficient practice had the potential to place R43 at risk of infections and pain associated with the lack of routine dental services.Findings include:Review of a facility policy titled Dental Services dated 10/01/25 indicated .It is the policy of this facility to assist residents in obtaining routine (to the extent covered under the State plan) and emergency dental care .Routine dental services .means the facility will, if necessary or required, assist the resident with making dental appointments. Review of R43's titled admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, indicated the facility admitted the resident on 12/26/24. Review of R43's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/21/26 located under the MDS tab indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 13) reviewed for nutrition was served thickened liquids as ordered by the physician. This deficient practice had the potential to place R13 at risk of choking or aspiration of liquids into the lungs Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Therapeutic Diet Orders, dated 02/01/26, revealed, All diet orders are to be communicated to the dietary department in accordance with facility procedures. Dietary and nursing staff are responsible for providing therapeutic diets in the appropriate form and/or the appropriate nutritive content as prescribed. Review of R13's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the EMR, revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including malnutrition and dysphagia. Review of R13's admission MDS with an ARD of 01/02/26 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a score of ten out of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the clinical records were complete for one of one resident (R) 79) reviewed out of a total sample of 34 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to create the opportunity for inaccurate medical records to be accessible to staff. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration with a revision date of 05/01/25, provided by the facility, indicated 20. Sign the MAR after administered. Review of a facility's policy titled Documentation in Medical Record, dated 03/01/25, indicated that .Each resident's medical record shall contain an accurate representation of the actual experience of the resident and include enough information to provide a picture of the resident's progress through complete, accurate, and timely documentation. Review of Resident (R)79's admission Record found under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated an admission date of 12/27/25 with diagnoses of appendicitis, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, type 2 diabetes, major depressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to adhere to infection control practices and policies during incontinence care for two of three residents (Resident (R) 172 and R181) observed for incontinence care in the sample of 51 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to place R172 and R181 at risk of cross-contamination and infection.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care with a revision date of 01/01/26 provided by the facility indicated that: It is the practice of this facility to provide perineal care to all incontinent residents during routine bath and as needed in order to promote cleanliness and comfort, prevent infection to the extent possible, and to prevent and assess for skin breakdown. Review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene with a revision date of August 2019 provided by the facility indicated that: 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interviews, review of maintenance documentation, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure siderails were securely attached to the bed for one (Resident (R) 190) of six reviewed for side rails out of a sample of 51 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to place R190 at increased risk of injury related to side-rail use. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Side Rail Safety, revised 03/01/25, indicated, Inspecting and regularly checking the mattress and bed rails for areas of possible entrapment; ensuring the bed frame, bed rail and mattress do not leave a gap wide enough to entrap a resident's head or body, regardless of mattress width, length, and/or depth, checking bedrails regularly to make sure they are still installed correctly, and have not shifted or loosened over time. Review of R190's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R190 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and a review of the policy titled Resident Rights, the facility failed to ensure one of 18 sampled residents (R) (R16) was informed of their rights regarding treatment, financial liability, and resident rights upon admission to the facility. The deficient practice resulted in a resident not having informed consent, not knowing their financial liability, or what their rights were.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights dated 2/1/2025, indicated The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility. Prior to or upon admission, the social service designee, or another designated staff member, will inform the resident and/or the resident's representative of the resident's rights and responsibilities.A review of R16's admission Record in the electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, document review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to protect the rights of one of eight residents (R) (R6) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, to be free from exploitation by a staff member. This failure had the potential to cause emotional distress or financial burden for R6.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 7/15/2025 revealed, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property. 'Exploitation' means taking advantage of a resident for personal gain through the use of manipulation, intimidation, threats, or coercion.A review of R6's admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, document review, and review of the policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure that one of three staff, Floor Technician (FT) (FT1), completed and documented a criminal background history, including a history of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, before employment. This failure had the potential to contribute to a substantiated allegation of exploitation for a facility resident (R) (R6). Findings included:A review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy dated 7/15/2025 revealed, The components of the facility abuse prohibition plan are discussed herein:I. ScreeningA. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property.1. Background, reference, and credentials checks shall be conducted on potential employees,contracted temporary staff, students affiliated with academic institutions, volunteers, andconsultants.2. Screenings may be conducted by the facility itself, a third-party agency, or an academic institution.3. The facility will maintain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and a review of the policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of misappropriation of resident property was thoroughly investigated for two of eight residents (R) (R5 and R28) reviewed for abuse. This failure had the potential to contribute to further misappropriation of property in the facility. Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 7/15/2025 revealed, An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur . Written procedures for investigations include: 1. Identifying staff responsible for the investigation.4. Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations. 5. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, a review of the policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care (LTC) Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to accurately code the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one of 52 sampled residents (R) (R20) related to a urinary tract infection (UTI) that was not coded when a resident returned from the hospital. This failure had the potential to result in incomplete care planning. Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled MDS 3.0 Completion, revised/reviewed 03/01/24, revealed Policy: Residents are assessed, using a comprehensive assessment process, to identify care needs and to develop an interdisciplinary care plan . Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. According to federal regulations, the facility conducts initially and periodically a comprehensive, accurate and standardized assessment of each resident's functional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and a review of the policy titled Diagnostic Testing Services, the facility failed to ensure a change of condition requiring immediate attention was addressed on time for one of seven residents (R) (R4) reviewed for change of condition. This failure had the potential to lead to increased pain or internal damage related to R4's dislocated left hip arthroplasty.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled Diagnostic Testing Services dated 10/1/2025 revealed, Qualified nursing personnel will receive and review the diagnostic test reports and communicate the results to the ordering Physician within 24 hours of receipt unless the report results falls outside of clinical reference ranges and require immediate attention at which time the Physician will be notified upon receipt . Documentation of diagnostic tests, the results, and date/time of Physician notification will be maintained in the resident's clinical record.A review of R4's admission Record located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances, the facility failed to acknowledge family concerns as grievances via email and failed to investigate grievances for one out of 48 sampled Residents (R) (R384). In addition, the facility failed to provide results for the concerns and grievances reported by residents during the Resident Council Meetings. The facility census was 214 residents. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances dated 3/1/2025 revealed that it is the policy of this facility to support each resident's and family member's right to voice grievances without discrimination, reprisal, or fear of discrimination or reprisal. Prompt efforts to resolve, including facility acknowledgement of a complaint/grievance. 1. (Name and Title) has been designated as the Grievance Official and can be reached at (contact information). 2. The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion;…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Nursing Services and Sufficient Staff, the facility failed to have sufficient nursing staff with the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services. The facility census was 214. Findings included: 1. An observation of the third floor, on 6/8/2025 at 10:15 am, revealed that the medication cart beside the nurse station was unlocked. No nurses were on the floor at the time of the observation. Resident (R) (R422) was sitting by the unlocked medication cart. The medication cart was unlocked from 10:15 am until 10:35 am, when a Certified Medication Aide (CMA) CCC locked the cart.An interview with CMA CCC, on 6/8/2025 at 10:35 am, revealed they believed the nurse was on break. The CMA attempted to contact the nurse by phone but was unsuccessful. The CMA locked the cart at 10:35 am and stated they would have the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) come and speak with me when she was back on the floor.An…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and resident council minutes reviews, and staffing record reviews, the facility failed to provide a registered nurse (RN) to provide care for eight hours a day during the weekends. This failure to provide an RN eight hours a day during the weekends could result in reduced quality of care and one-star staffing levels. Findings included:During a record review of the Resident Council Minutes, not dated, revealed Multiple residents say that the call light response sometimes takes up to three hours and that the RCA's (Resident Care Assistants) will come and turn off without resolving their issue. [Resident Council President] says that he has witnessed nurses coming in and leaving medications on tray tables without making sure that the resident has taken them.During an interview with the Scheduler Coordinator SS, on 5/27/2025 at 10:38 am, said, Capacity for the facility is 240 residents. There is a bad staffing shortage for nurses. Nurses have a full template, meaning they work three days a week and every other weekend. The second floor has two nurses.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to post the nurse staffing data daily at the beginning of each shift. The facility did not ensure the nurse staffing data was posted daily in a prominent place readily accessible to residents, staff, and visitors. This practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 205. Findings included:1. During observation of the facility lobby on 6/8/2025 at 10:05 am revealed that nurse staffing data was posted by the front door, dated 6/6/2025.An interview with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) on 6/8/2025 at 12:15 pm revealed that the staff schedule from 6/6/2025 should not be posted. The IDON stated that a new staffing sheet should be posted daily. The IDON stated she would look into where the staff posting for 6/8/2025 was and why it was not posted. An interview with the IDON on 6/12/2025 at 3:00 pm revealed that the front desk receptionist who was at the facility on Fridays was usually given the weekend staffing to leave for the weekend receptionists to post. This receptionist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record reviews of the facility assessment and staff interview, the facility failed to complete the facility assessment. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 214 residents.Findings included:The Facility Assessment for Perimeter Rehabilitation Suites, dated 10/25/2024 by the Executive Director [Administrator] and reviewed by QAA (Quality Assessment and Assurance) Committee on 10/25/2024, section titled Information about our staffing patterns indicates Five Star Staffing Level is a 1 star. Administration- Staffing as described above is adequate as evidenced by: The resident's administrative needs are met. Information about our Staffing Patterns: Individual staff assignments are determined in order to promote continuity of care for residents within and across the assignments in the following ways: Maintaining the same staff on every floor as much as possible. Maintaining the staff based on the budgeted PPD and census. Staffing goals based on the information described above: The goal is to have actual PPD to be the same as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain staffing requirements by receiving a one-star staffing rating and having excessively low weekend staffing. The deficient practice could result in a lack of needed care provided to the residents.Findings included:A record review of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) submitted to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) revealed the facility had a one-star staffing rating and excessively low weekend staffing. A review of the CASPER report (essential tool provided by CMS for healthcare facilities to assess quality measures and improve patient care based on data from the Minimum Data Set (MDS)) provided to the facility on the first day of the survey (5/5/2025) revealed the facility had a one-star staffing rating and excessively low weekend staffing.A review of an All Staff Meeting dated 8/30/2024 revealed under 2d.1 star on staffing. i. As you all know, staffing is not where we want it to be. ii. The goal is to have a full staff in the building: 8 CNAs (Certified Nursing Assistants) on each floor, morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Infection Surveillance and Laundry, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. The facility failed to ensure an ongoing system of surveillance for infections and failed to ensure the laundry room and equipment were kept clean, ensure washers were functioning properly, and ensure clean and dirty linens were stored appropriately. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 212. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Infection Surveillance dated 6/1/2024 revealed that under Policy, A system of infection surveillance serves as a core activity of the facility's infection prevention and control programs. Its purpose is to identify infections and to monitor adherence to recommended infection prevention and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-06-17 · tag F0924 — widespread
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to have handrails that were firmly secured and affixed to the corridor walls on three of the three resident floors of the facility (Second Floor, Third Floor, and Fourth Floor). Specifically, handrails were loose and crooked throughout each floor. The deficient practice had the potential to affect the residents who can use handrails on all floors. Findings included:The Director of Maintenance job description, revised in October 2020, revealed that the facility will conduct ongoing inspections to identify areas and equipment requiring improvement/repairs. Examine equipment, systems, and physical plant (i.e., buildings) to determine needed installations, services, or repairs.During an observation of the Third Floor on 6/8/2025 at 10:20 am, the handrails across from the Third Floor nurse station were loose and hanging crooked on the wall. The handrails across from room [ROOM NUMBER] were loose and hanging crooked on the wall. The handrails across from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Resident and Family Grievances, the facility failed to ensure that resolutions were provided for concerns discussed in the Resident Council meetings. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Resident and Family Grievances, with an implementation date of 3/1/2022 and a revision date of 3/1/2025, included Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgment of working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance. A review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes dated January 2024 showed that during the meeting, a resident requested that her showers be scheduled between 7:00 am and 3:00 pm instead of between 3:00 pm and 11:00 pm. There was no resolution documented for the concern. A review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes dated February 2024, a resident voiced that his linens were not getting changed often enough, and he was having an issue with his sink. No resolution was documented for the concerns. A review of the Resident Council Meeting minutes dated March…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policies titled Notification of Changes, and Change of Room or Roommate, the facility failed to notify two of five sampled residents (R) (R381and R6) responsible parties of changes; and failed to notify one resident's (R) (R194) physician of a change in condition and transfer to the hospital. Findings included: During a review of the facility policy titled Change of Room or Roommate, revised 3/1/2025, revealed that .6. The social services designee or Licensed Nurse should inform the resident's sponsor/family in advance of a change in the resident's room or roommate. Review of the facility policy titled Notification of Changes dated 4/1/2024, revealed that the purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident and consults the resident's physician when there is a change requiring notification. These notifications include a significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition and a transfer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for residents receiving showers in two of the three shower rooms (Third Floor Shower room and Fourth Floor Shower room) in the facility. The shower rooms contained unsecured doors, soiled linens, resident gowns on the floor, unmarked toiletry items, trash, masks, and gloves on the floor, in addition to unclean toilets and equipment. Findings included: 1. Observation on 5/29/2025 at 10:55 am of the Third Floor Shower room revealed, the shower room door was propped open. There were no staff or residents in the shower room at the time of the observation. The shower room contained six wet and visibly soiled wash cloths scattered throughout on the floor, three wet bath towels scattered throughout on the floor, three used and unmarked bars of soap on the floor in the main shower stall, 12 pairs of gloves, inside out, scattered about the floor in multiple areas, multiple visible soiled tissues lying beside the toilet on the floor, and two shower chairs that had brown substance on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, the facility failed to ensure medication carts were locked and secured when unattended by authorized staff. This failure had the potential to allow unauthorized access to medications and biologicals by staff, residents, and visitors. The facility's census was 214 residents. Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, implemented 3/1/2022 and last revised 3/1/2025, included . 1: 1a. All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls. 1b. Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments. 1c. During a medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart. 1. During an observation on 5/22/2025 at 5:07 am, medication administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of facility policy titled Standardized Menus, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable, attractive, and hot for four of seven sampled residents (R) (R62, R114, R472, and R473) reviewed for food palatability. This failure had the potential to affect 203 of 214 residents who consumed food prepared from the facility's kitchen.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled, Standardized Menus revised 3/30/2025, revealed that the facility shall provide nourishing, palatable meals to meet the nutritional needs of the residents based on the Recommended Daily Allowances (RDA) of the food and Nutritional Research Council, of the National Academy of Sciences, standardized cycle menus are planned in advance and utilized. The policy continued that the facility will make reasonable efforts to provide food that is appetizing and culturally appropriate for residents. A review of the Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 2/2/2024 at 10:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Funds Management Policy and Procedure, the facility failed to ensure one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R114) responsible parties (RP) had immediate access to the resident's funds. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Resident Funds Management Policy and Procedure, revised 3/1/2022, revealed that .if a resident requests a check to be cut from their resident funds account, the facility will withdraw funds from the Resident Funds Account to the petty cash account and print the request within 24 hours. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R114 revealed an original admission date of 5/13/2022 with multiple diagnoses of, but not limited to, metabolic encephalopathy, dysphagia following cerebral infarction, acute pulmonary edema, Type II diabetes, hemoptysis, cognitive communication deficiency, and dysphagia. A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Confidentiality of Personal and Medical Records, the facility failed to safeguard the personal and medical information of residents. In addition, the facility failed to ensure computer screens located on the medication carts were locked when not in use by a nurse who displayed residents' personal and medical information. This affected two out of 48 sampled residents (R26 and R213). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Confidentiality of Personal and Medical Records, dated 3/31/2023, revealed that personal and medical records for residents are to be kept confidential, including written documentation, video, audio, and computer-stored information. 1. Observation of the Fourth Floor, on 5/30/2025 at 8:25 am, revealed that a medication cart was unattended in the hall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER]. No nurse was in sight at the time of the observation. The computer located on top of the medication cart was opened, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse incident for one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R101). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, with an implementation date of 3/1/2022 and a review date of 7/1/2024, included, It is the policy of this facility to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Further review revealed the section titled Reporting/Response stated, reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency, adult protective services, and to all other required agencies (e.g., law enforcement when applicable) within specified timeframes. A review of the admission record for R101 showed that the resident was admitted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Maintaining Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments, and the MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual, the facility failed to ensure MDS assessments was accurately coded for two of 48 residents (R) (R114 and R155). Findings included: In a review of the facility policy titled Maintaining Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments, revised 9/1/2024, it was documented that .8. MDS information will be made available to all professional staff members who need to review the information in order to provide care to the resident. Review of the facility provided document titled MDS Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User's Manual for coding Active Diagnosis from the CMS RAI Version 3.0 Manual CH 3: MDS Items [I] October 2024 page I-17 revealed, Section I: Active Diagnosis in the last 7 days (cont.) 4. The resident was admitted without a diagnosis of schizophrenia. After Admission, the resident is prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan to include activities of daily living (ADL) and legal blindness for one out of 48 sampled residents (R) (R387). Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans implementation date of 3/1/2022, read in part, The comprehensive care plan will describe, at a minimum, the following: a. The services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Review of R387's admission Record located in the electronic medical records (EMR) section revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, burn of second degree, legal blindness, and homelessness. Review of R387's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/24/2024, located in the resident's EMR under the MDS tab indicated the facility assessed R387 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Comprehensive Care Plans and Fall Prevention Program, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were updated for three of 19 sampled residents (R) (R372, R393, and R122 ). Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans implemented 3/1/2022 and last revised 3/1/2025, documented on page 2: The comprehensive plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS assessment. Qualified staff responsible for carrying out the interventions specified in the care plan will be notified of their roles and responsibilities for carrying out the interventions, initially and when changes are made. Review of the facility's fall prevention policy titled, Fall Prevention Program: implemented 3/1/2022 and last revised 8/1/2024, revealed on page 2: Each resident's risk factors, and environmental hazards will be evaluated when developing the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care was provided for one of four residents (R) (R212) reviewed. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), implemented 3/1/2022 and last revised 3/1/2025, documented that the facility will, based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable. 3. A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R212 revealed an original admission date of 2/21/2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, multiple injuries, contusion of lung, injury at unspecified level of thoracic spinal cord, injury at unspecified level of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide podiatry services for one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R 384). The deficient practice had the potential to lead to a lack of nail care and inappropriate foot care.Findings included:A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R384 was admitted with diagnoses including but not limited to aphasia following cerebrovascular disease, cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting unspecified side, major depressive disorder, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in subcortical hemisphere, cardiac murmur, atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, and vitamin deficiency.The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/7/2024, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of three, indicating severe cognitive impairment.A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Program, the facility failed to ensure two of eight Residents (R) (R95) and (R183) received restorative therapy. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Restorative Nursing Programs, implemented 3/1/2022 and last revised 3/1/2024, revealed that it is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable level. A resident's Restorative Nursing plan will include: a. The problem, need, or strength that the restorative tasks are to address. b. The type of activities to be performed. c. Frequency of activities. d. Duration of activities. e. Measurable goal and target date. Review of electronic health records (EHR) revealed that R183 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, muscle weakness, spinal stenosis lumbar, difficulty in walking, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-17 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program, the facility failed to ensure each Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) employed by the facility had a minimum of twelve hours of nurse aide training per year, for one of five CNAs reviewed for the required training. Findings included:A review of the facility policy titled Nurse Aide Training Program dated 3/1/2025, revealed that each nurse aide shall be provided 12 hours of in-service training annually. A review of the required yearly Training Transcript for CNA HHH revealed that from April 2024 to April 2025, the CNA only had 10.7 training hours.During an interview with the Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) on 6/5/2025 at 8:35 am, it was confirmed that CNA HHH did not meet the required twelve hours of CNA training from April 2024 to April 2025.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family member and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Elopement Policy: Procedure for Locating Missing Resident, the facility failed to notify the State Reporting Agency and the Police of an elopement in a timely manner for one of seven sampled residents (R) (R1). Findings include: Review of the Elopement Policy: Procedure for Locating Missing Resident indicated: a. Any staff member becoming aware of a missing resident will alert personnel using facility approved protocol (e.g. internal alert code). b. The designated facility staff will look for the resident. c. If the resident is not located in the building or on the grounds, Administrator or designee will notify the police department and serve as the designated liaison between the facility and the police department. The administrator or designee should also notify the company's corporate office. Review of admission diagnoses for R1 indicated diagnoses of mental disorder, autistic disorder, psychotropic disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan, consistent with resident rights, which included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical needs for four of 33 sampled residents (R) (R11, 72, 125, and 162) Related to (1) antidepressant medication usage for R11; (2) observing for side effects and behaviors for the resident's antidepressant medication usage for R72; (3) observing for side effects and behaviors for R125's antidepressant medication usage; (4) for risk of falls for R162. Findings included: A review of the facility policy, Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated 6/1/2023, revealed: residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to date and label resident food items in the refrigerator, failed to keep the refrigerator clean, and failed to keep the microwave clean in between uses. This failure had the potential to affect all residents that resided on the third-floor unit, 65 residents out of 220 residents in the building. Findings included: A review of facility policy and procedure titled, Date Marking for Food Safety, dated 4/1/2023, states the following: Policy: The facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready-to-eat, time/temperature control for safety .Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines for Staffing: Refrigerated, ready-to eat, time/temperature control for safety food (i.e. perishable food) shall be held at a temperature of 41 [degrees] F [Fahrenheit] or less for a maximum of seven days. The food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. The individual opening or preparing a food shall be responsible for the date marking the food at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that was free from accident hazards for one of 45 sampled residents (R) (R162). Findings included: The facility's policy for fall prevention titled, Fall Prevention Program, was reviewed. The policy was reviewed/revised by the facility on 3/1/2023. Step three of the policy described interventions for residents with a low to moderate risk for falls. One of those interventions read, Bed is locked and lowered to a level that allows the resident's feet to be flat on the floor when the resident is sitting on the edge of the bed. Step six of the policy indicated that each resident's risk factors, and environmental hazards would be evaluated when the comprehensive care plan was being developed, and that interventions would be monitored for effectiveness. A review of the medical record for R162 revealed an admission date of 11/22/2022 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease and a history of falls with fracture. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs, to include adequate monitoring for three of seven residents (R11, R72 and R125) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings included: A review of the facility policy, Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated 6/1/2023, revealed: residents are not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, and the medication is beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication(s). The record also revealed: 12. The effects of psychotropic medications on a resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being will be evaluated on an ongoing basis, such as: a. Upon physician evaluation (routine and as needed), b. During the pharmacist's monthly medication regiment review, c. During MDS review (quarterly, annually, significant change),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in locked compartments when not within direct line of sight of the staff observed during medication administration on two of three floors (Fourth Floor and Third Floor). Findings included: On 10/10/2023, at 10:33 am during facility tour, an observation outside the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] on the fourth floor revealed that the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. Certified Medication Aide (CMA) LL was in resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] administering medication and did not have a visual view of the unlocked medication cart which was not secured by the locking mechanism. There were noted to be visitors, staff, and residents who passed in the vicinity of her medication cart. During an interview on 10/10/2023 at 10:35 am, with CMA LL, she was asked if she was aware that she had left the medication cart unlocked and unsecure. She stated, Yes I am, but I don't have keys to the medication cart, the nurse has the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to maintain clinical records that are complete, accurate, readily accessible, and systematically organized for one of 33 sampled residents (R) (R125) reviewed for medical records accuracy. Findings included: A review of the admission Packet revealed for Personal Belongings that: all personal items brought from home and/or hospital should be documented on [an] inventory sheet. Record review of the policy Resident Personal Belongings, dated 3/1/2022, revealed: Residents and families are encouraged to inventory belongings with the Resident Care Assistants on admission. As new items are brought into the facility during the resident's stay, residents and family are encouraged to notify the social worker or designee so that the items may be inventoried. The residents and families are encouraged to refrain from keeping cash and are encouraged to bring cash to the business office to be kept in the safe. A review of R125's face sheet dated 10/12/2023 revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff administered medications in a manner to prevent the spread of infections for two of four residents (R) (R201 and R216) observed during medication administration. Findings included: During medication administration observation on 10/11/2023 at 8:25 am, Registered Nurse (RN) KK was observed preparing medications to be administered to R201. RN KK opened the drawer to the medication cart, took out medications in packaged unit dose envelopes, and began to punch each medication in a plastic medication cup. When RN KK popped three tablets of escitalopram (Lexapro) 5 mg from a bubble pack, the tablets dropped into his ungloved right hand and with his bare ungloved fingers. He then placed the tablets into the plastic medication cup and administered these medications to R201. During medication administration observation on 10/11/2023 at 8:36 am, RN KK was observed preparing medications to be administered to R216. RN KK opened the drawer to the medication cart, took out medications in a packaged bubble pack, and began to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$201,403 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $201,403 — penalty dated 2025-06-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
GA NC 14, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2022
MARTIN, MATTHEWIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 04/01/2022
ENGLANDER, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2022
LEIBOWITZ, CHAIMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 04/01/2022

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$22.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-8.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 5%Other / private 29%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$333per resident / day
operating cost
$10,125per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$306per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115270. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next