Sadie G. Mays Health & Rehabilitation Center
1821 Anderson Avenue NW, Atlanta, GA 30314 · Non profit - Corporation · 206 certified beds · (404) 794-2477 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited Jun 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0570)
- it has 4 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $53,965 in federal fines (most recent 2024-06-26)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- it did not file the payroll staffing data CMS requires — its 1 of 5 staffing rating is the rating CMS assigns for not reporting, not a measure of how many nurses are on the floor
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.7% | 15.3% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.3% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 11.3% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.9% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 14.4% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.0% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 47.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.4% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.4% | 19.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.8% | 2.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 41.2% | 78.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.8% | 25.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.0% | 11.6% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.69 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.78 | 1.90 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 31.4–68.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.7%CMS range 9.4–17.3 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 91.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.91 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
No payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours are on file for this home — and the record suggests that is because it did not report them. CMS rates its staffing 1 of 5, which is the rating CMS assigns when a home does not report. Every Medicare-certified nursing home is required to submit its actual payroll data quarterly, and that submission is what makes staffing numbers auditable rather than a claim. A home that does not file is not the same as a home with no data yet: ask this home directly what its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage are, why its payroll data is not filed, and weigh the independent health-inspection score heavily in the meantime.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and a review of the policy titled Food Preparation Guidelines, the facility failed to prevent avoidable accidents for two of three sampled residents (R) (R41 and R56) related to (1) hot chocolate burn and (2) fall risk. Harm was identified to have occurred on 3/18/2025 when R41 spilled hot chocolate on her left arm, causing a burn, blisters, and requiring transport to an acute care setting and wound treatment. Findings included:1. A review of a facility policy titled Food Preparation Guidelines dated 11/11/2025 indicated that proper (safe and appetizing) temperature means both appetizing to the resident and minimizing the risk for scalding and burns.A review of R41's electronic medical record (EMR) titled admission Record indicated the facility admitted the resident on 4/18/2025.A review of R41's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/2/2025 indicated the staff could not determine a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 residents (R) (R6 and R15) weren't provided with nursing care and services to ensure their medical needs were met related to pain management for R6 and R15; administering medication without a physicians order for R15; and a pest infestation of gnats that were on the R6 left leg wound. Further, harm was identified to have occurred when R15 was administered Fluoxetine (Prozac) for forty-eight weeks after it was discontinued on 6/29/2023, resulting in increasing unusual behavior, a low-grade temperature, swelling in bilateral knees, and going from ambulating independently to not being able to ambulate. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications dated April 2019 that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed; only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy Administering Medications the facility failed to ensure one of forty-three sampled residents (R) (R15) was receiving medications as prescribed by the psychiatrist. The pharmacy continued to dispense Fluoxetine (Prozac) to R15 after it was discontinued on 6/29/2023 by the psychiatrist. Harm was identified to have occurred when R15 was administered Fluoxetine (Prozac) for forty-eight weeks after it was discontinued on 6/29/2023, resulting in increasing unusual behavior, a low-grade temperature, swelling in bilateral knees, and going from ambulating independently to not being able to ambulate. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Administering Medications dated April 2019 revealed that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Only persons licensed or permitted by this state to prepare, administer, and document the administration of medications may do so. The Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-06-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (R) (R15) was free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. Resident (R15) was administered Fluoxetine (Prozac) during a medication observation. Harm was identified to have occurred when R15 was administered Fluoxetine (Prozac) for forty-eight weeks after it was discontinued on 6/29/2023, resulting in increasing unusual behavior, a low-grade temperature, swelling in bilateral knees, and going from ambulating independently to not being able to ambulate. Findings included: A review of the admission Record for R15 revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, major depressive disorder, osteoarthritis, thyrotoxicosis, and unspecified dementia, severe, with other behavioral disturbances. A review of the resident's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-12-19 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and a review of the policy titled Management of Beneficiary Funds, the facility failed to ensure that the surety bond was sufficient to cover the resident trust fund deposits. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect 129 of 129 residents in the facility.Findings included:A review of the undated facility's policy titled Management of Beneficiary Funds describes the process of managing beneficiary funds, but does not address the Surety [NAME] review of the facility's Surety Bond Document dated 3/26/2025 through 5/26/2025, indicated the amount of the bond was $190,000.00.A review of six months of the facility's Bank Statements from May 2025 to November 2025 revealed that five out of six bank statements had daily balances that were greater than the surety bond: The May 2025 beginning balance was $224,998.91 and ending balance was $229,239.06 The July 2025 beginning balance $229,239.06 and the ending balance was $228,566.62 The August 2025 beginning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have an adequate water management program for 129 of 129 residents in the facility. The facility's water management program was incomplete and was not consistent with current ASHRAE (American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers) Guidelines, which specifically called for design and maintenance procedures for the potential exposure of Legionnaires' disease (a serious pneumonia infection) within a healthcare facility. Findings included:A review of the website for ASHRAE titled Successfully Managing the Risk of Legionellosis, dated 4/7/2021, indicated that Legionellae, the biological classification name for a [NAME] of bacteria, is the plural, referring to more than one Legionella bacterium. Legionellosis is any illness (disease) caused by exposure to Legionella. Legionnaires' disease (LD) and Pontiac fever (PF) are the two known types of legionellosis and are potentially fatal. These multisystem…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response, the facility failed to ensure the call button was accessible for one of 27 sampled residents (R) (R56). This failure had the potential to place R56 at risk for accidents, injuries, or unmet needs related to an inability to call for staff assistance.Findings included:A review of the policy titled Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response dated 12/2/2025 revealed, The call system will be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room.A review of R56's Record of admission revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, peripheral vascular disease, and muscle weakness.A review of R56's Care Plan Report dated 8/26/2024 revealed that R56 was at risk for falls due to limited mobility and was unaware of safety needs. An additional focus included [R56] had limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident family member and staff interviews, and a review of the policies titled Medication Administration and Notification of Changes, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of a change of condition for one of 27 residents (R) (R93) related to a refusal of bedtime medications for four days in a row. This failure had the potential to result in clinical complications and potentially hospitalization.Findings included:A review of the policy titled Medication Administration dated 11/11/2025 revealed, Report and document any adverse side effects or refusals. A review of the policy titled Notification of Changes dated 12/2/2025 revealed, The facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification. Circumstances requiring notification include: 3. Significant change in the resident's physical, mental, or psychosocial condition, such as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, the facility failed to ensure the provider and the resident representative were notified when seven out of 21 sampled Residents (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, and R7) were not administered their medications, as ordered by the provider. This failure placed the provider and the resident's representatives of potential complications from not receiving their medications.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 2001 revealed, .Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included stroke, diabetes, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and was dependent on dialysis.Review of the December 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) located in the Orders tab…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per the provider's order for seven of 21 sampled (Residents (R)1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 reviewed. This failure placed the residents at risk of health complications and a diminished quality of life.Findings included:Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 2001 revealed, .Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed.Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame.Medication administration times are determined by resident need and benefit, not staff convenience.1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to stroke, diabetes, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and was dependent on dialysis.Review of the discharge-return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one out of 21 Resident (R) (R14) reviewed in the sample. Specifically, the facility did not have any urinary drainage bags available and R14 was placed in an adult incontinence brief. This had the potential for the resident to have a diminished quality of life. Findings include:Review of R14 Medical Diagnoses located in the electronic medical record (EMR) tab titled Medical Diagnosis revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (stroke) with left sided hemiplegia and hemiparesis, and chronic kidney disease stage three.Review of R14's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/10/2025 located in EMR tab titled MDS revealed the resident has a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The resident was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The resident was incontinent of the bladder and bowel and wore an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility’s policy titled, “Policy and Procedure, the facility failed to timely report allegations of abuse to the required agencies and physician within the state reporting time frame for two of 21 sampled Residents (R) (R12 and R9). This failure has the potential to increase the risk of abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility’s undated policy titled “Policy and Procedure revealed Abuse and Neglect” directs staff as follows: “…. Notify the shift supervisor immediately upon identification of actual or suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, and/or misappropriation of resident property… Report the incident to the Director of Nursing and Administrator immediately, but no later than two hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury… Report the incident to the State Agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation of alleged abuse of two (Residents (R)12 and R9) out of 21 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to provide a safe environment for all residents against abuse. Findings include: A review of the facility’s undated policy titled “Policy and Procedure: Abuse and Neglect” revealed …An Accident/Incident Report will be initiated immediately upon identification of actual or suspected abuse, neglect, mistreatment, injuries of unknown origin, and/or misappropriation of resident property…The Administrator or designee will oversee the internal investigation…the investigative process includes but it not limited to the following: completed accident/incident report, witness statements, assessment of injuries, resident interviews, interview with the alleged perpetrator, interviews with staff, including those on duty at the time of the incident or those who may have significant information or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to revise the care plans related to falls for four (Residents (R)9, R10, and R15) from a sample of 21 residents. This failure had the potential for residents to continue to fall and possibly result in injuries. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans – Comprehensive Person Centered with a revision date of March 2022 revealed, …Assessments of residents are ongoing, and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change…The interdisciplinary team reviews and updates the care plan: when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition; when the desired outcome is not met; when the resident has been readmitted to the facility from a hospital stay; and d. at least quarterly, in conjunction with the required quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment… 1. Review of R10’s “Medical Diagnosis” located in the EMR tab titled Medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were provided for one of three residents (Residents (R)9) who was dependent on staff for assistance with ADLS out of a total sample of 21. This failure placed R9 at risk of a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R9 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include but not limited to vascular dementia, stroke, and right-sided paralysis.Review of the 6/7/2024 ADLs Care Plan located in the Care Plan tab of the EMR revealed, The resident has an ADL self-care performance deficit r/t (related to) Hemiplegia [paralysis], Limited mobility, Limited ROM [range of motion]. Interventions included, Bathing/Showering: The resident requires assistance by (2) staff with bathing/showering 3 times weekly and as necessary. Dated 6/7/2024.Review of the EMR under the Task tab revealed, a shower was documented in the EMR on 3/7/2025. 3/29/2025, 4/10/2025, and 4/15/2025 (refusal). There was no other documentation in the Task…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to potentially prevent accidents for two of four residents (Residents (R)9 and R11) reviewed for accidents in a total sample of 21. These failures placed the residents at risk of injury and unmet care needs.Findings include:Review of an undated facility policy titled Falls and Injury Program revealed, .Each resident's care plan will include specific fall prevention and management strategies tailored to their individual needs and risk factors.1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R11 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, dementia.Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/21/2025 revealed R11 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to properly position urinary drainage bags to promote adequate drainage and to potentially prevent recurring urinary tract infections (UTIs) for two residents (R)16 and R14 from four residents with urinary drainage bags out of a total sample of 21 residents. This failure has the potential for residents to develop recurring UTIs.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Urinary Catheter Care Policy (undated) revealed, .Proper catheter care is essential to prevent infections, promote comfort, and maintain the dignity of residents.Check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks.The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder.Be sure the catheter tubing and drainage bag are kept off the floor. 1. Review of R16's Medical Diagnosis sheet located in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Standard Precautions, Administering Oral Medications, and Glucometer Cleaning, the facility failed to ensure nebulizers were bagged, dated, and labeled for two of three residents (R) (R20, R68); ensure the oxygen concentrator tubing was dated and the filter in the concentrator was clean for one resident (R20); and ensure bed pans were properly bagged, labeled, and stored for one resident (R607); and (5) to properly clean and disinfect the medication cart and provide a clean barrier for accu-checks for one resident (R74). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Standard Precautions revealed under the Policy Statement standard precautions are used in the care of all residents regardless of their diagnosis, or suspected or confirmed infection status. Standard precautions presume that all blood, body fluids, secretions, excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin, and mucous membranes may…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-10-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, Antibiotic Stewardship - Orders for Antibiotics, and Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use the facility failed to maintain review of antibiotic prescribing practices and the documentation of the programs efforts to follow up on antibiotic usage data for all nine months (January 2024 to September 2024) that were reviewed. The deficient practice had the potential to affect any resident who was prescribed an antibiotic. Findings included: A review of the policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship detailed the Policy Statement Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section details 1. The purpose of our antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. 4. If an antibiotic is indicated, prescribers will provide complete antibiotic orders including the following elements: a. Drug name b.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating the facility failed to report an alligation of sexual abuse for two of four residents (R10 and R108) reviewed for abuse. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Reporting and Investigating with revised date of September 2022, all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of abuse for three of four residents (R) (R98, R96, and R3) investigated for abuse. Findings included: A review of the facility policy entitled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating states, dated September 2022, revealed that all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. 1. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R98 was admitted to this facility on 7/1/2017 with diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia, vascular dementia with behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed quarterly for two residents (R) (R33) and (R405) of 58 sampled residents. Findings included: A review of the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) revealed that R33 was admitted on [DATE]. There was no updated MDS assessment in the resident clinical record. A review of the EMR revealed that R405 was admitted on [DATE]. There was no updated MDS assessment in the resident clinical record. During an interview on 10/24/2024 at 12:20 pm, the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC) NN revealed she worked at the facility for 27 years and is responsible for completing the comprehensive MDS assessments. The MDSC confirmed that an updated MDS assessment was not completed for R33 as she overlooked completing it. During an interview on 10/24/2024 at 3:43 pm, MDSC OO revealed she has worked at the facility for 10 years. MDSC OO confirmed that R405 did not have an updated assessment. During an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to ensure that the baseline care plan was completed for one of 11 residents (R) (R355) admitted with a catheter. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revised date of March 2022 revealed that a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. A review of the clinical record for R355 revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, cerebral a neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, fracture of the right lower leg, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing age-related nuclear cataract, bilateral dystrophies primarily involving the retinal pigment epithelium, urinary tract infection, and retention of urine. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, the facility failed to provide preventative care consistent with professional standards of practice for one of 58 sampled residents (R) (R455) at risk for skin breakdown related to repositioning. Findings included: A review of the facility's policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, dated 2001 revealed the policy was: Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out ADL care. Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral care. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R455 was admitted to the facility initially on 6/16/2023 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, Alzheimer's Disease, repeated falls, adverse effect of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff and resident interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Call System, the facility failed to ensure that one of 58 sampled residents (R) (R23) had a functioning call light. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Call System dated 7/1/2021 revealed, It is our policy that each resident will have a call light and that call lights are answered. The residents can gain access to staff via the call light system. If the call light system is not operational or if there is an isolated incident involving the call system, team members will make hourly rounds. Maintenance will be notified to assess the call system. A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed that R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed R23 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six, indicating sever cognitive impairment; has upper extremities impairment on one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-06-26 · tag F0729 — widespreadVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and the State of Georgia Nurse Aide Registry Nurse Aide Certification Renewal the facility failed to ensure that two Certified Nursing Assistance (CNA) certifications were renewed out of ten employee files selected for review. One CNA TT worked six months with an expired certification and CNA UU worked thirty days with an expired certification. The facility's census was one hundred and fifty-five residents. Findings included: A review of the State of Georgia Nurse Aide Registry Nurse Aide Certification Renewal revealed that to remain on the Registry and to be eligible to work in a licensed Medicaid & Medicare facility, you must meet the requirements for Re-Certification. Failure to return the Application for Renewal as a Certified Nurse Aide will result in your name being removed from the Georgia Nurse Aide Registry and will not be eligible to work as a nurse aide by a licensed Medicaid facility. 1. A review of CNA TT's employee file revealed the original certification…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, and Administering Medications, the facility failed to maintain infection control standards by not cleaning and disinfecting reusable items between residents, and not performing hand hygiene after assisting a resident and picking paper up off the floor during a medication observation. The facility census was 150 residents. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment with a revised date of September 2022, revealed that resident-care equipment, including reusable items and durable medical equipment, will be cleaned and disinfected according to current Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for disinfection and the OSHA Bloodborne Pathogens Standard. It is further noted that reusable items are cleaned and disinfected or sterilized between residents (e.g., stethoscopes, and durable medical equipment). A review of the policy titled Administering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled, 7 Step Cleaning Process, and Maintenance Service, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable, homelike environment in five of 30 sampled resident rooms related to a buildup of dirt and grime inside the air discharge grille of the Packaged Terminal Air Conditioner (PTAC) units; a large hole under the sink in one bathroom; missing sheetrock in one resident's room; and by not ensuring an adequate supply of linen for nine days. Findings included: 1. A review of the undated facility policy titled 7 Step Cleaning Process, revealed the policy was to establish an efficient cleaning process unless noted otherwise and that it can be used as a checklist or guide. It is intended that all these steps be completed during each cleaning process. The purpose of this policy is to educate and guide all staff in daily cleaning procedures. The procedures and guidelines of the policy revealed to dust all horizontal and vertical surfaces including ledges and sills, to inspect the room area,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-06-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and a review of the facility's policies titled Pest Control and Maintenance Service, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program on one of four units (Unit B) related to an infestation of black gnats. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Pest Control dated May 2008 revealed that it is the facility's policy that it shall maintain an effective pest control program. It is noted that the facility maintains an ongoing pest control program to ensure that the building is kept free of insects and rodents. Maintenance services assist, when appropriate and necessary, in providing pest control services. A review of the facility policy titled Maintenance Service with a revised date of December 2009 states that maintenance service shall be provided to all areas of the building, grounds, and equipment and that the maintenance department will monitor and oversee the pest control program. 1. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs was provided for two of 16 sampled residents (R) (R6 and R8) related to providing wheelchair accessibility to accommodate R6 in getting out of bed and related to honor accommodations for bathing for R8. Findings included: 1. A review of the electronic medical Record (EMR) revealed that R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses of, but not limited to, chronic pain, gout, and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R6 presented with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated R6 was cognitively intact. During an observation on 5/2/2024 at 11:30 am, R6 was observed lying flat in the bed, the room was dark with the blinds closed, and the television was off. There was no bed on the side of the room by the door and there was no wheelchair, Geri-chair, or any type…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolatedNot hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, the policy titled Background Screening Investigations, and the Director of Human Resource job description, the facility failed to ensure that a criminal background check was conducted for two Registered Nurse's (RN) of ten employee files selected for review (RN GG and RN HH). The facility census was one hundred and fifty residents. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated April 2021 revealed that residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. The resident abuse, neglect, and exploitation prevention program consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: Conduct team member background checks and not knowingly employ or otherwise engage any individual who has been found guilty of abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of property, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, the facility failed to report a situation involving misappropriation of a controlled drug (Oxycodone) to the State Survey Agency (SSA) for two of 18 sampled residents (R) (R17 and R18). Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated September 2022 revealed that all reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of all investigations are documented and reported. Reporting Allegations to the Administrator and Authorities. If resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property or injury of unknown source is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered and Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for five residents (R) (R3, R7, R8, R9, and R16) of sixteen reviewed for care plan. This failure had the potential for these residents not to receive treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, dated March 2022, revealed Policy Statement: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-26 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, the facility failed to provide ADL assistance to one of eight residents (R) (R9) reviewed. This failure had the potential to cause R9 to be unclean and feel self-conscious of his appearance. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, with a revised date of March 2018 revealed that residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADL care independently, with the consent of the resident, and in accordance with the plan of care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Background Screening Investigations and Hiring Process, the facility failed to ensure that one of three staff members (Registered Nurse (RN) HH) had the required licensure to provide nursing care to the residents. The facility census was 150 residents. Findings included: A review of the facility policy titled Background Screening Investigations dated April 2021, revealed that any licensed professional applying for a position that may involve direct contact with residents, his/her respective licensing board is contacted to determine if any sanctions have been assessed against the applicant's license. A review of the facility policy titled Hiring Process dated 1/21/2024 revealed that this policy provides guidance for the hiring of team members. The Human Resources Director is responsible for overseeing all aspects of the hiring process, which includes: Human Resources will obtain copy of two forms of identification and will verify license or certification prior to an offer being made. A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-26 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents, the facility failed to obtain vaccination consent before administering COVID-19 vaccines on two of five Residents (R) (R1 and R10) reviewed for vaccination status. Findings included: A review of the policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Vaccination of Residents with a revised date of May 2023 revealed the following: Each resident is offered the COVID-19 vaccine unless the immunization is medically contraindicated, or the resident is fully vaccinated. The resident's medical record includes documentation that indicates, at a minimum, the following: a. That the resident or resident representative was provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine including (1) samples of the educational materials used; (2) the date the education took place; and (3) the name of the individual who received the education. b. Signed consent. 1. A review of R1 Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed an admission date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a privacy curtain to ensure personal privacy for two of 45 sampled residents (R) (R#16 and R#47). Findings included: A review of R#16's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/10/22, indicated that R#16 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A review of R#47's most recent MDS assessment, dated 7/1/22, indicated that R#47 had a BIMS score of 13, indicating R#47 was cognitively intact. Observation on 8/15/22 at 9:42 a.m. and 3:20 p.m., and on 8/18/22 at 3:21 p.m. revealed the name plate outside the door to the room with two resident names on it (R#16 and R#47). There was no privacy curtain between the A and B beds. In an interview on 8/18/22 at 3:21 p.m., R#16 stated the curtain had been gone forever. The resident could not provide a specific time frame. R#16 stated the maintenance director was aware that the curtain was missing. R#16 stated they would like to have some privacy. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, observations, and review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, it was determined the facility failed to follow physician orders related to oxygen administration for two of two residents (R) (R#44 and R#134) reviewed with oxygen. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled, Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, revealed, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for safe oxygen administration. Under Preparation, revealed, 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Review the physician's orders or facility protocol for oxygen administration. 2. Review the resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the resident. 3. Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed. 1. A review of R#44's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted the resident with diagnoses that included acute on chronic diastolic (congestive) heart failure, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, and atherosclerotic heart disease of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of 5% or less. There were two errors out of 27 opportunities, which resulted in a 7.4% medication error rate for two of three residents (R) (R#105 and R#106) observed during medication pass. Findings include: A facility policy, titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. 4. Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. 10. The individual administering the medication checks the label to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 1. A review of R#106's face sheet revealed the facility admitted R#106 on 12/16/20 with a diagnosis of atherosclerosis of the coronary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-08-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observations, and review of the facility's policy titled, Storage of Medications and Administering Medications, it was determined the facility failed to maintain a secure, locked medication cart for one out of six medication carts. Findings include: A review of the facility policy, titled, Storage of Medications, revised November 2020, revealed, The facility stores all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. 6. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing drugs and biologicals are locked when not in use. Unlocked medication carts are not left unattended. A review of the facility policy, titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed, 19. During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse or aide. The cart must be clearly visible to the personnel administering medications, and all outward sides must be inaccessible to residents or others passing by. Observation on 8/15/22 at 12:39…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$53,965 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $53,965 — penalty dated 2024-06-26
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| HAKEEM, MALIK | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | since 01/04/2022 |
| LAXTON, KATHI | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 07/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115542. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.