Place At Martinez, The

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 27 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 73.9 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.60 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.36 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.71 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.19 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0847 — widespread
  Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the arbitration agreement provided to all facility residents, with a current census of 79 residents, was not required to sign an arbitration agreement as a condition of admission to, or as a requirement to continue to, receive care at the facility. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was not mandatory for all residents admitted to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility provided admissions pack revealed under I. Dispute Resolution Procedure: that 3. Arbitration: This arbitration provision (Provision) is executed in conjunction with an agreement for admission and for the provision of nursing facility services (the admission Agreement) by the Center to (the Patient and/or Guarantor). The parties to the admission Agreement acknowledge that this Provision is part of the admission Agreement. This Provision is binding on and benefits the Center and Patient and their successors, heirs, executors, administrators, or assigns, and survives the lives or existence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-11-21 · tag F0848 — widespread
  Provide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on document review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure that the arbitration agreement signed by all facility residents, with a current census of 79 residents, provided for the selection of a venue that was convenient to both parties. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that a neutral venue available to both parties was documented within the arbitration agreement. This exclusion places facility residents and families at an unknown disadvantage in potential future disputes.Findings include: Review of the facility provided admissions pack revealed under I. Dispute Resolution Procedure: that it failed to include a clause to allow for any arbitration to be conducted at a site which was convenient to both parties signing the form. No statement or clause identified the process of determining a venue for a dispute to ensure a neutral location. During an interview on 11/18/25 at 10:38 AM, the Administrator stated that the facility's arbitration agreement was within the facility's admission contract. The Nursing Home Administrator stated that all facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, and sanitary environment in the main dining room where 14 out of a total of 85 residents ate their meals. This failure had the potential to lead to the spread of infection or feelings of discomfort and dissatisfaction among residents. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled, The Place Facilities Safe and Homelike Environment, revealed, Housekeeping and maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly, and comfortable environment. During initial observations of the main dining room on 11/18/25 at 9:11 AM, four of five observed ceiling vents were covered with fuzzy dust and dirt. These vents were located above residents' dining tables. The wall below the pass-through window to the kitchen had spilled liquid or food debris running down the length of the wall and onto the floor below. During observation of lunch in the main dining room on 11/18/25 beginning at 12:07 PM, 14 residents were seated at the tables eating lunch. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure that eight of the eight residents who received pureed diets out of a total of 85 residents received the foods as called for in the menus. These failures placed the eight residents at risk for weight loss, malnutrition, or dissatisfaction with their meals.Findings include: Review of a handwritten, undated document titled Texture Count, provided by the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed the facility had eight residents who received a pureed diet. 1. During interview and concurrent observation of breakfast service in the kitchen on 11/20/25 at 7:34 AM, Dietary Aide (DA) 2 stated she prepared pureed eggs, pureed waffles, and cream of wheat for the pureed meals. She was observed serving pureed meals consisting of pureed eggs, waffles, and cream of wheat. Review of the Diet Extensions: Thursday, Week 1, Menu, provided on paper by the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed that the pureed breakfast meal should have consisted of pureed oatmeal, pureed banana, pureed sausage patty, and pureed waffle. During an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-21 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, document review, policy review, and review of McGeer's criteria, the facility failed to have an Antibiotic Stewardship Program that followed current standards of practice for prescribing an antibiotic for five of five residents (Resident (R) 25, R62, R63, R46, and R50) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship out of total sample of 27 residents. This failure had the potential for residents to be prescribed unnecessary antibiotics.Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy titled, The Place Antibiotic Stewardship Program indicated, The program includes antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use. The facility uses the (CDC [Centers for Disease Control] NHSN [National Healthcare Safety Network] Surveillance Definitions, updated McGeer's criteria, or other surveillance tool) to define infections. Review of McGeer's Criteria dated 11/05/24 revealed, . Table 2. Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Surveillance Definitions Syndrome: UTI without…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility assessment, the facility failed to ensure one of 27 sampled residents (Resident (R) 107) had the needed adaptive equipment for meals. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for an undignified existence. Findings include: Review of [The Facility Name] Facility Assessment, last updated 02/28/24 and provided by the facility, revealed .Services and Care We Offer Based on our Residents' Needs.These are the services we offer our residents.Nutrition-Individualized dietary requirements.assistive devices. Review of R107's undated admission Record, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuritis (CIDP). Review of R107's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/13/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision (DSM-5-TR), the facility failed to ensure one of five residents (Resident (R) 107) reviewed for unnecessary medications had an adequate indication for its use out of 27 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk of receiving unnecessary medications.Findings include: Review of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition, text revision (DSM-5-TR) revealed .Cultural Concepts of Distress. Relevance for Diagnostic Assessment. The term cultural concepts of distress refers to ways that individuals experience, understand, and communicate suffering, behavioral problems, or troubling thoughts and emotions. Three main types of cultural concepts of distress may be distinguished. Cultural idioms of distress are ways of expressing distress that may not involve specific symptoms or syndromes, but that provide collective,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, policy review, and the review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, the facility failed to offer or provide documentation of consent or refusal for pneumonia vaccines for two of five residents (Residents (R)25 and R63) and/or their resident representatives (RR) out of 27 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to put these residents at increased risk of developing pneumonia.Findings include: Review of the CDC website page titled Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults, dated March 2025 and located at https://www.cdc.gov/pneumococcal/downloads/Vaccine-Timing-Adults-JobAid.pdf, revealed the CDC recommended pneumococcal vaccination for all adults [AGE] years of age or older. A PCV20 or PCV21 (types of pneumonia vaccines) should be administered greater to or equal to one year after PPSV23 given at any age. 1. Review of R25's Face Sheet, located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R25 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA