No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Union County Nursing Home

164 Nursing Home Circle, Blairsville, GA 30512 · Non profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (706) 745-4948 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (706) 745-4948 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
218 Hospital Dr · (706) 835-2719 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Ingles0.2 mi
207 Highway 515 # B · (706) 745-1700 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
43 Highway 515 E · (706) 745-9862 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
253 Highway 515 E · (770) 883-2576

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased21.0%15.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.6%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.9%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%11.3%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.1%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.0%15.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.5%20.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%5.6%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.5%15.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.0%19.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.3%2.6%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.6%78.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.1%25.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.6%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.552.151.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.241.901.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.17hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.6%CMS range 43.6–62.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.2%CMS range 6.4–12.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 4.2–10.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.951.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.52
RN hours/ resident / day
1.10
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.92
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.54
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.42
RN hoursweekends
37.3%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 109.9 residents a day — about 73% occupied, or roughly 40 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.54 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.95 on weekdays — 36% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.56 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-10-02)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-01)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plan Meetings, the facility failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 34 residents (R) (R82). The deficient practice had the potential to prevent R82 from receiving services according to their care needs.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care Plan Meetings revealed under Purpose: .Each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place.The Comprehensive Care plan will be ongoing, focusing on each induvial resident as a unitary being. Resident and their representative will play an active role in the development of goals and implementation of the residents' Comprehensive Care Plan. Under Procedure: number 2.This comprehensive care plan will address resident goals, actual and potential problems, needs, strengths, and individual preferences for the resident.Review of R82's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-02 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications, the facility failed to ensure one of four residents (R) (R82) bilateral hearing aids were applied as ordered by the physician. The deficient practice had the potential to reduce R82 quality of life by increasing the probability of impaired communication.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Administration of Medications, dated 2/2021, revealed under Procedure: D. The person administering the drugs immediately following the administration must chart medication administration as being given on the eMAR. The eMAR applies the date, time administered, dosage, ect., and e-signs by the person entering the data.Review of R82's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed diagnoses that included, but were not limited to bilateral hearing loss, receptive expressive language disorder, dementia, and cognitive communication deficit.Review of R82's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-10-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies, titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment and Enhanced Barrier Precautions, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for four of 15 residents (R) (R7, R9, R75 and R83). Specifically, the facility failed to maintain Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when administering medications via gastrostomy tube for R9, and providing urinary catheter care for R7, the facility also failed to ensure shared medical equipment was sanitized between R75 and R83 during medication administration.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment, revised 2/2021 under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1.c.non-critical items are those that come in contact with intact skin but not mucous membranes. 1. Non- critical resident-care items include bedpans, blood pressure cuffs, crutches and computers. d. Reusable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-07-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility-provided document titled Texture Modification Inservice, the facility failed to ensure a puree recipe was followed to conserve the nutrient value of puree country-fried steak for six of six residents receiving a pureed diet. This deficient practice had the potential to cause residents receiving a pureed diet to have a decreased nutritional intake and a potential for weight loss. Findings include: Review of the undated facility-provided document titled Texture Modification Inservice revealed the section titled Guidelines for Texture Modification: Pureed Foods included Never free pour large amounts of liquids or thickeners into purees as it can impact the nutritional value and quality of the food item. Observation on 6/26/2024 at 10:45 am of the Dietary Manager in Training (DMIT) BB preparing pureed foods revealed she did not have or follow a recipe as she prepared the pureed country-fried steaks. DMIT BB prepared the pureed country-fried steak with broth and several cups of water. In an interview during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Receiving, the facility failed to appropriately label and date food items stored in the kitchen's walk-in freezer. The deficient practice(s) had the potential to place 96 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen at risk of contracting a foodborne illness. The facility census was 101. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Receiving revealed the Policy Statement of Safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in the transportation, delivery, and subsequent storage of all food items. The Procedures section documented 5. All food items will be appropriately labeled and dated either by manufacturer packaging or staff notation. An observation of the walk-in freezer in the kitchen with the Registered Dietitian (RD) and Dietary Manager (DM) on 6/25/2024 at 9:15 am revealed two open boxes of cookie dough with about 60 cookies in one box and 80 cookies in the other box. The RD confirmed the two boxes of cookie dough were opened and not labeled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medication, the facility failed to properly maintain, and store three of six medication cart as evidenced by missing end of shift controlled medication count signatures. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medication revised April 2007 revealed under Policy Statement: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Observation on 6/27/2024 at 9:45 am of three of six medication carts revealed each cart had a controlled substance book which had the current months End of Shift Controlled Drug Count sheet in each book. The Pink A Hall sheet was missing five signatures, the pink B Hall sheet was missing 10 signatures, and the blue C Hall was missing three signatures on their sheets. Interview on 6/27/2024 at 9:52 am with RN NN revealed that the Medication Room Pink B Hall had no issues and the medication cart - Pink B Hall cart had no storage issues. The interview revealed that the nurse who was coming on and the nurse who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Antipsychotic Drug Use and PRN Medication, the facility failed to make recommendations to include stop dates for psychoactive medications lorazepam, used to treat anxiety, and trazodone, used to treat insomnia, which were prescribed as needed (PRN) for two of five sampled residents (R18 and R64). The deficiency had the potential to adversely affect the severity of the diagnoses for which they were prescribed. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled, Antipsychotic Drug Use revealed under Policy Interpretation and Implementation: The need to continue PRN orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days requires that the practitioner document the rationale for the extended order. Review of the facility policy titled PRN Medication, revised 11/7/2022, revealed the Policy was The pharmacist is responsible for assuring appropriate and safe prescribing procedures are followed. The frequency with which PRN or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, family and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Mouth Care, the facility failed to provide denture care for two of 42 sampled residents (R) (R26 and R78). The deficient practice had the potential to cause mouth pain and discomfort, that could lead to decreased oral intake of nutrition and hydration for R26 and R78. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Mouth Care with a revision date of February 2018 revealed that the Purposes of this procedure are to keep the resident's lips and oral tissues moist, to cleanse and freshen the residents' mouth, and to prevent oral infections. 1. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R26 revealed that she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included but were not limited to a fracture of shaft of humerus and superior rim of left pubis. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a completion date of 5/10/2024 revealed that R26 had a Basic Interview of Mental Status (BIMS)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of facility policies titled Hand Hygiene, Perineal Care, and Administering IV Medications, the facility failed to use proper hand hygiene during perineal and catheter care for one resident (R) (R75), failed to properly close the door to a transmission-based precautions (TBP) room for one resident (R257), and to properly disinfect a needleless connector on a percutaneous intravenous central catheter (PICC) line after flushing and before connecting the intravenous antibiotic for one resident (R258). The deficient practices had the potential to place the residents at risk for serious infections. The sample size was 42 residents. Findings include: Review of the undated facility policy titled Hand Hygiene under Policy revealed, All staff will perform proper hand hygiene procedures to prevent the spread of infection to other personnel, residents, and visitors. This applies to all staff working in all locations within the facility. Under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines revealed, Additional considerations: (a)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of policies titled Receiving, Food Storage: Dry Goods, and Food Storage: Cold Foods, the facility failed to ensure opened food items in the dry storage area were labeled and dated; failed to discard expired food items in the walk-in freezer, two reach in freezers and two of two resident pantries. This deficiency had the potential to affect 90 of 91 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Receiving revised 9/2017, revealed the policy is that safe food handling procedures for time and temperature control will be practiced in the transportation, delivery, and subsequent storage of all food items. Procedure: 5. All food items will be appropriately labeled and dated either through manufacturer packaging or staff notation. 6. All food items will be stored in a manner that ensures appropriate and timely utilization based on the principals of first in-first out inventory management. Review of the policy titled Food Storage: Dry Goods revised 9/2017, revealed the policy is all dry goods will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-01-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that essential equipment in the kitchen was in working order as evidenced by ice buildup inside the walk-in freezer on an air flow vent above the doorway, ice formation down the interior door frame, and across the floor. This deficiency had the potential to affect 90 of 91 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Equipment revised 9/2017, revealed the policy statement is all foodservice equipment will be clean, sanitary, and in proper working order. Procedure: number 1. All equipment will be routinely cleaned and maintained in accordance with manufacturer's directions and training materials. Number 4. All non-food contact equipment will be clean and free of debris. During the initial tour of the kitchen on 1/10/2023 at 9:25 a.m. with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) and the Registered Dietician (RD), the walk-in freezer was observed to have ice formation measuring approximately four…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Bathrooms, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment related to dust build up on bathroom air vents on one of six resident halls, rooms 201 through 217. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Bathrooms revised 4/2006, revealed the policy statement is bathrooms shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary manner and shall be cleaned on a daily basis. Observation on 1/10/2023 at 11:57 a.m. and 1/11/2023 at 11:25 a.m. revealed the bathroom air vents in resident rooms 201 through 217 were noted to have dust buildup on and in them. Observation and interviews on 1/12/2023 at 11:26 a.m. with the Administrator, Engineering Supervisor, and the Housekeeping Supervisor, verified the dust buildup on the vents in the bathrooms of rooms 201 through 217. The Engineering Supervisor indicated they take the vents down yearly and clean them. The Administrator indicated that housekeeping should be cleaning them as needed when dust is visible. The Administrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from potential accident hazards by not ensuring that medications, biologicals, or other potentially harmful material was not left within the reach of one resident (R) (R#94). The sample size was 32. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Copy of 5.d Storage and Expiration of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles dated 1/2023 revealed procedure: C. General storage procedures: 3. Facility should ensure that all medications and biologicals, including treatment items, are securely stored in a locked cabinet/cart or locked medication room that is inaccessible by residents and visitors. M: Bedside medication storage: 1. Facility should not administer/provide bedside medications or biologicals without a physician/prescriber order and approval by the interdisciplinary care team and facility administration. 2. Facility should store bedside medication or biologicals in a locked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to clean and ensure proper storage continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) mask in a manner to prevent cross contamination for one of three residents (R) R#85, receiving CPAP administration. The census was 91. Findings include: 1. Review of the policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Items and Equipment revised 10/2018, revealed the Policy Interpretation and Implementation number 1. The following categories are used to distinguish the levels of sterilization/disinfection necessary for items in resident care: b.) Semi-critical items consists of items that may come in contact with mucus membranes or non-intact skin (e.g., respiratory therapy equipment). 2. Critical and semi-critical items will be sterilized/disinfected in a central processing location and stored appropriately until use. 2. Review of the policy titled CPAP/BiPAP Support revised 3/2015 revealed: General Guidelines section number…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BIERSCHENK, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2019
DAVENPORT, RICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
GARY, THOMASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
OWENBY, GREGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
PARIS, DINAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/18/2010
ROWE, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2015
TOWNSEND, NICHOLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/15/2016
GAY, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2016
BURNETTE, CHRISTALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2021
SELF, DEBRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/10/2016
SANDERS, ALANIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 02/21/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115695. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-10-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next