Countryside Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 30 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 51.7 residents a day — about 83% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.08 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.22 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.34 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for an allegation report of sexual abuse for one resident (R) (R3) from a sample of 5 residents. The deficient practice increased the risk that allegations went without a thorough investigation resulting in potential harm to residents. Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, dated 09/2022 documented under section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation and section titled Investigating Allegations and 1. All allegations are thoroughly investigated. 7. The individual conducting the investigation as a minimum: a. reviews the documentation and evidence. e. interviews any witnesses to the incident. h. interviews staff members (on all shifts who have had contact with the resident.l. documents the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-08-21 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, review of the facility policy titled Departmental Supervision, Nursing, and review of the [NAME] Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) dated January 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025, the facility failed to ensure the required Registered Nurse (RN) coverage of at least eight consecutive hours per day, seven days per week. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 52 residents. Findings include:A review of the facility policy titled Departmental Supervision, Nursing, revised August 2022, revealed the Policy Interpretation and Implementation section included, . 2. A registered nurse provides services at least eight consecutive hours every 24 hours, seven days a week. Review of the [NAME] Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) dated January 1, 2025, through March 31, 2025, revealed that during the second quarter reporting, the facility was identified as not having an RN working on the dates of 1/1/2025, 1/4/2025, 1/11/2025, 1/12/2025, 1/19/2025, 1/26/2025, 2/2/2025, 2/8/2025,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, review of manufacturer package inserts, and review of the facility policies titled Medication Labeling and Storage and Insulin Administration, the facility failed to ensure one opened insulin vial was discarded on the discard date and failed to date one opened insulin vial when opening on one of two medication carts. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents receiving the insulin at increased risk of receiving insulin with altered effectiveness. Findings Include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, revised 2/2023, revealed the Medication Labeling section included, . 5. Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. Review of the facility's policy titled Insulin Administration, revised 2/2014, revealed the Steps in the Procedure (Insulin Injections via Syringe) section included, . 4. Check expiration date, if drawing from an opened multi-dose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0568 — widespread
  Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Resident Trust Policy, the facility failed to ensure money was taken from the Resident Trust Account and used for resident needs for 39 out of 50 (census at time of misappropriation on 2/9/2024) resident. Finding include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Trust Policy revised 11/6/2023 revealed This Policy has been established to assure compliance with maintaining a complete and accurate accounting of resident funds. It is mandatory that a reconciliation between the Resident Trust Fund and the bank statement be completed monthly. Each quarter it is also a requirement that a resident trust statement be presented to the resident/responsible party. Review of the police report revealed the total theft of the resident trust fund was $52,323.72 from an audit performed by the [NAME] President (VP) of Revenue Cycle Management of the facility. The audit revealed and identified the former Business Office Manager (BOM) as the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — widespread
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and local police interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property-Reporting and Investigating, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from abuse by misappropriation of funds by staff for two of 24 sampled residents (R) (R203 and R45) who had trust accounts. Substandard Quality of Care was identified related to Misappropriation of Funds. Findings include: A review of the facility policy titled Freedom from Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment, and Misappropriation of Property-Reporting and Investigating revised date [DATE] under Policy Statement revealed: Any complaint, allegation, observation or suspicion of resident abuse, mistreatment or neglect, whether physical, verbal, mental or sexual, involuntary or voluntary, is to be communicated to the Abuse Coordinator, thoroughly reported, investigated and documented in a uniform manner as detailed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews and review of the Facility Assessment Tool and the Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report Quarter (Q) 1 2024, the facility failed to ensure there was adequate nursing staff to serve their residents. The deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the care and services provided to the facility residents. The facility census was 48 residents. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment Tool updated 2/6/2024 revealed the facility was licensed for 61 beds but the average daily census was 49.7 residents. The Staffing Plan included four licensed nurses working per 12-hour shift, six nurse aides working 12-hour shifts and two nurses' aides working eight-hour shifts to provide direct resident care, and four administrative nurses. Review of the PBJ Staffing Data Report Q 1, 2024 (October 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023) revealed, based on the data submitted, the facility triggered a One-Star rating for Q1 2024 (failure to submit PBJ data by the deadline; more than four days in the quarter without Registered Nurse (RN) staffing hours;…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Food Temperature, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitation measures were followed and to uphold appropriate sanitation practices when checking food temperatures. Specifically, the incorrect sanitization of the thermometer between use did not align with food safety standards. The deficient practice posed a risk of foodborne illness for 45 of 48 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: A review of the facility's policy titled Food Temperature revealed: All foods prepared for residents to maintain specific temperatures and mandates that thermometers used to measure these temperatures be sanitized between uses to prevent cross-contamination. Observation on 4/14/2024 at 10:30 am during a tour of the facility's kitchen revealed the Dietary Manager was observed conducting periodic test trays to ensure that the food served to residents maintained appropriate temperatures. However, the thermometer used for checking food temperatures was improperly sanitized between uses. The Dietary Manager…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, police investigation reports, and review of the facility policies titled, Freedom from Patient Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Property-Reporting and Investigating, the Administrator failed to ensure an allegation of exploitation was reported to the State Agency in a timely manner for one resident (R) (R45). The facility census was 48 residents. Finding Include: A review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, or Misappropriation- Reporting and Investigating revised date January 2022 under Policy Statement in both policies revealed: Any complaint, allegation, observation or suspicion of resident abuse, mistreatment or neglect, whether physical, verbal, mental or sexual, involuntary or voluntary, is to be communicated to the Abuse Coordinator, thoroughly reported, investigated and documented in a uniform manner as detailed below. A Review of the Facility Incident Report (FIC report) revealed a report was not made until 2/13/2024 by the Administrator. This was four days after the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to uphold the right of dignity for one of three residents (R) (R8) receiving catheter care by not providing necessary privacy measures. Findings include: Observation on 4/14/2024 at 10:00 am of R8's urinary catheter bag dragging on the floor without a privacy bag. Observation and interview on 4/15/2024 at 2:45 pm with R8 revealed the privacy bag was missing following a cleaning session, according to R8. Observation on 4/16/2024 at 9:15 am revealed R8's catheter bag was dragging on the floor without a privacy bag. Observation on 04/16/2024 at 1:15 pm, two surveyors observed R8 outside with his catheter bag was exposed and no privacy bag in place covering the catheter bag. Interview on 4/18/2024 at 11:45 am with the Administrator, she confirmed that it was the facility's protocol to use privacy bags to cover catheter bags.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate space to meet the needs for one of three residents (R) (R8) in a shared room, compromising the resident's comfort and mobility. Findings include: Observation and interview on 4/14/2024 at 8:45 am revealed R8 resting in bed C in a room shared with two other residents. R8 expressed discomfort due to insufficient space, noting that her movement was restricted, especially access to the bathroom, because belongings from the resident in bed B encroached into her area. R8 reported that she had made repeated requests to the staff for more space to navigate her room, which was especially important due to her status as a below-knee amputee. R8 stated that her requests had previously gone unaddressed. Interview on 4/17/2024 at 11:30 am with the Maintenance Director revealed they were initially unaware of the specific space requirements for residents. The Maintenance Director measured the room space allocated to each resident. The measurements were as follows: Resident A-144 square…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,068 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $4,068 — penalty dated 2024-04-18
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-05-17 for 74 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 89% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $245K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA