Archbold Living Camilla
37 South Ellis Street, Camilla, GA 31730 · Government - County · 156 certified beds · (229) 336-8377 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2026
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (39) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,345 in federal fines (most recent 2025-02-11)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 1 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 16.8% | 15.3% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 5.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 3.2% | 0.9% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 19.7% | 2.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.1% | 11.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.2% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.9% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.6% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.7% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.4% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.9% | 19.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.8% | 2.6% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 64.1% | 78.4% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.9% | 25.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.2% | 11.6% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.66 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 1.90 | 1.80 | typical |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.07 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.0–15.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 37.8% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.4% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 4.3% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.07 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 156 beds and averages 136.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.16 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.68 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.62 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.31 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
39 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures and Identifying Sexual Abuse and Capacity to Consent, Facility B failed to ensure one of three Residents (R) (R1) was protected from sexual assault by R2. Specifically, R2 was found in R1's room sitting next to her bed. R1 was naked from the waist down with blood noted to her vaginal area and R2 was later found to have blood on his right middle finger. Subsequently, R1 was sent to the hospital after the sexual assault by R2 resulting in a one-centimeter laceration to her left vaginal wall.The facility's failure to ensure protection from the sexual assault had the potential to result in physical, mental, or psychosocial harm. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/29/2025 at 5:00 pm and was determined to have existed on 11/29/2025 at appropriately 6:09 pm. The facility's Administrator for Facility B was notified that an acceptable IJ removal plan was received on 12/30/2025. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-08 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, Standards of Performance Nursing Home Administrator (PPNH), and Standards of Performance Director of Nursing (PPNH), Facility B failed to ensure one of three Residents (R) (R1) was protected from sexual assault by R2. Specifically, Administration failed ensure R1 maintain an environment free from abuse in a manner that efficiently maintained the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for the resident.The facility's failure to ensure protection from the sexual assault had the potential to result in physical, mental, or psychosocial harm. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 12/29/2025 at 5:00 pm and was determined to have existed on 11/29/2025 at appropriately 6:09 pm. The facility's Administrator for Facility B was notified that an acceptable IJ removal plan was received on 12/30/2025. The surveyor validated the full implementation of the facility's removal plan, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Care planning- IDT, Facility A failed to follow residents' baseline care plans directing staff to medicate residents for pain related to wound care for one of three residents (R#402) who received wound care. Actual harm was identified on 5/10/23 when the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) failed to assess and administer medication to R#402 prior to providing wound care treatment, which resulted in pain. Findings included: The facility's policy titled Care planning- IDT, dated July 2020, indicated, Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident. A review of R#402's Face Sheet revealed the facility admitted R#402 on 5/5/23 with a diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease, Right Parenchymal Contusion, Panniculitis, Unspecified Dementia, unspecified severity with behavioral disturbances and Pressure ulcer of sacral region, Stage 3. A review of the baseline care plan revealed R#402 has an impairment of skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-05-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview, and review of facility policy Pain Assessment and Management, Facility A failed to stop and address verbal and facial expressions of pain during wound care for one of three residents (R) (R#402) observed for wound care resulting in harm. Actual harm was identified on 5/10/23 when the Wound Care Nurse (WCN) failed to assess and administer pain medication to R#402 prior to providing wound care treatment, which resulted in pain during the treatment. Findings include: A review of the Policy titled Pain Assessment and Management ,dated July 2020, revealed the pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices related to pain management. 2. Pain management is defined as the process of alleviating the resident's pain based on his or her clinical condition and established treatment goals. Recognizing Pain: 1.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Falls Risk Management, Facility A failed to ensure four of four Residents (R) (R1, R2, R3, R4) reviewed for falls had fall risk assessments, 3 (three)-day post fall follow-up, and/or neurological checks completed to prevent the risks and minimize complications from falls.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Falls and Falls Risk Management, dated August 2019 under the Policy Statement revealed, Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident's specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling and to try to minimize complications from falling. Under the Policy Interpretation and Implementation subsection titled Prioritizing Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk revealed, 1. The staff, with the input of the Attending Physician, will identify appropriate interventions to reduce the risk of falls. If a systematic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care, Facility A failed to ensure one of four Residents (R) (R8) with pressure ulcers was provided perineal care in a sanitary manner to prevent cross contamination of loose stool to a clean area. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for infection.Findings include:Review of the facility policy Perineal Care dated 4/2022 under the section titled, PURPOSE revealed, The purpose of this policy is to cleanse the skin and perineum to promote healing and patient comfort. Under the section titled Policy revealed, It is the policy of (named facility) to provide cleansing of the perineum following voiding, defecation, or during bathing for dependent patients or patients that may need partial assistance.Review of the medical record revealed R8 was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses that included but are not limited to Alzheimer's disease, heart failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facilities' policy titled Administering Medications, Facility B failed to ensure that one of three nurses (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) FF) observed during medication administration observation did not pre-set medications in labeled cups for one hall of four halls (100-Hall) resulting in medication error rate of 55.56%.Findings includeReview of the facilities' policy titled Administering Medication dated 10/19/2017 under the Policy Statement revealed, Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Under the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 7. The individual administering the medication must verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication.An observation on 8/8/2025 at 8:22 am, LPN FF was observed coming up the hall with her medication cart. On top of her medication were six plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the facilities' policy titled Storage of Medications, Facility A failed to ensure one of one medication storage room did not have expired over the counter (OTC) medications on the shelf and failed to ensure two of two medication carts (Long Hall and the Short Hall) did not have expired medications. In addition, Facility B failed to ensure one of two medication storage rooms (located on Bluebird hall) did not have expired medication on the shelf and failed to ensure one of four medication carts (100-Hall) did not have expired medications. Findings include:Review of the facilities' policy Storage of Medications dated 10/19/2017 under the Policy Statement revealed, The facility shall store all drugs, and biologicals in a safe, secure and orderly manner. Under the section titled Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed, 4. The facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility policy review, Facility B failed to ensure kitchen staff thoroughly cleaned and air-dried pans prior to storage. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of foodborne illness and had the potential to affect residents in one of two buildings (Facility B) who received dietary services. Facility failed to ensure that soap was dispensing into the dishwasher after replacing the dish detergent. These failures had the potential to affect all residents in building B, who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Metz Culinary Management Air Drying of Tableware, Utensils, and Pots and Pans dated 01/07/2025, revealed, Purpose: Items must be allowed to drain and to air-dry before being stacked or stored. Stacking wet items such as pans prevents them from drying and may allow an environment where microorganisms can begin to grow. Procedures: . i. Equipment and utensils shall be air-dried using racks or storage stands in a self-draining position to permit air to pass around the items…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and policy review, Facility A failed to ensure garbage was properly disposed of and contained which would affect all the residents and staff in one of two buildings (building B). Findings include: Review of the undated facility's policy, Waste/Garbage Storage, Disposal, Cleaning of Containers, and Pest Prevention revealed, Purpose: prevent contamination and the transmission of disease by pests and rodents .The outside compactor is kept closed and locked at all times except when putting trash into it. The area around the compactor shall be kept clean by all who use it. Observation on 05/13/25 at 10:06 AM, with the Dietary Manager (DM) of the area behind the kitchen in building B where the trash dumpsters were located revealed two dumpsters had the lids open on top and side compartment doors open. There was also trash behind the dumpsters consisting of old chairs. Outside of the kitchen door was a trash can filled with boxes that were to be broken down and six empty 35-gallon plastic oil jugs lying on the ground that were to be disposed of in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and review of facility policy, Facility B failed to maintain a Legionella Water Management Program. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Legionella Water Management Program, dated 08/20/22, indicated, Our facility is committed to the prevention, detection and control of water-borne contaminants, including Legionella .The purpose of the water management program is to identify areas in the water system where Legionella bacteria can grow and spread, and to reduce the risk of Legionnaire's disease .The water management program includes the following elements: A detailed description and diagram of the water system in the facility, including receiving; cold water distribution; heating; hot water distribution; an waste. During an interview on 05/16/25 at 10:15 AM, Engineering (E) stated, We do not have a water diagram for the facility, and we do not have a detailed description of the water system in the facility. I knew that one had to be done, but I had not gotten around to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-16 · tag F0887 — widespreadEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews, Facility B failed to maintain staff documentation of current COVID-19 vaccination status. This failure had the potential to affect all 132 residents in the facility and all staff. Findings include: Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) B on 05/16/25 at 12:18 PM revealed We do not have current COVID-19 documentation for our staff members either immunized or not. I did not know that we had to have that documentation. During an interview on 05/16/25 at 12:33 PM, the Administrator revealed, We do not have current vaccination status for COVID-19 for our staff. We provide education, but do not keep staff status.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidance and policy review, the facility failed to monitor and evaluate antibiotic usage for five of seven residents (Resident (R) 117, R100, R47, R119 and R95) reviewed for antibiotic usage out of 31 sampled residents. This failure had the potential to affect residents in the facility safety related to antibiotic usage. Findings include: Review of an undated, untitled CDC document located at http://uprevent.[NAME].com/2855wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/nh-hac_mcgreercriteriarevcomp_2012-1.pdf; revealed, The Core Elements of Antibiotic Stewardship for Nursing Homes indicated, .Improving the use of antibiotics in healthcare to protect patients and reduce the threat of antibiotic resistance is a national priority .Antibiotic stewardship refers to a set of commitments and actions designed to 'optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with antibiotic use' .CDC also recommends that all nursing homes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the risk versus the benefits of psychotropic medication use prior to being administered psychoactive medications for two of five (Resident (R) 79, and R38) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of 31 sampled residents. This failures placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights dated 08/2019 revealed, .1. Federal .laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to: .participate in decision-making regarding his or her care . 1. Review of R79's undated Admitting and Discharge Record provided by the facility revealed admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of major depressive disorder. Review of R79's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/08/25 and found under the Aspen MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to ensure residents were informed in advance of their right to attend and participate in their care plan conference for two of four residents reviewed for care planning (Resident (R) 28 and R79) out of 31 sampled residents. This failure placed the residents at risk for their care plans not being person centered. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care Planning revealed .Our facility's Care planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident .3. The resident, the resident's family and/or the resident's legal representative/guardian or surrogate are encouraged to participate in the development of and revisions to the resident's care plan. 4. Every effort will be made to schedule care plan meetings at the best time of the day for the resident and family . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, Facility A failed to obtain the CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) and CMS-10123 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) for one of five residents (Resident (R) 136) when Part A Medicare services ended. This failure prevented R136 or responsible party from appealing the decision of the facility and/or making an informed decision related to the cost of continued therapy services. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Advance Beneficiary Notifications dated 03/2013 revealed, The purpose is to provide instructions for issuing Advance Beneficiary Notice to applicable Medicare patients so that the patient may make an informed decision as to whether they will receive noncovered items or services for which they may have to accept financial responsibility. Review of R136's medical record revealed R136 was admitted to Medicare part A therapy services on (no date listed). R136's last covered day of Part A service was 05/03/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record reviews, and review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Facility A failed to provide a timely quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment data submission for one (Resident (R)78) of one resident reviewed for MDS over 120 days old out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings include: Review of R78's undated Face Sheet provided by the facility revealed R78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction. Review of R78's quarterly MDS Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/24/25 provided by the facility revealed it was completed on 02/25/25. Review of R78's MDS 3.0 Missing OBRA Assessment Report run date 05/07/25 provided by the facility revealed . Last Record Identifiers: . Target Date 12/03/24. During an interview on 05/15/25 at 9:58 AM, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) B indicated she completed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to develop care plans related to bed rail use for two of four residents reviewed for care planning (Resident (R) 28 and R75) out of 31 sampled residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and increased risks of accidents. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Care Planning revealed, Our facility's Care Planning/Interdisciplinary Team is responsible for the development of an individualized comprehensive care plan for each resident .2. The care plan is based on the resident's comprehensive assessment . Review of the facility's policy titled, Using Care Plan dated 11/2018 revealed, .The care plan shall be used in developing the resident's daily care routines and will be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident. 1. Review of R28's undated Admitting and Discharge Record provided by the facility revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to review and revise residents' care plans for one of four residents review for care planning (Resident (R) 50). R50's care plan was not revised to reflect his current status. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Using Care Plan, dated 11/2018 revealed, The care plan shall be used in developing the resident's daily care routines and will be available to staff personnel who have responsibility for providing care or services to the resident .5. Changes in the resident's condition must be reported to the MDS [Minimum Data Set] Assessment Coordinator so that a review of the resident's care plan can be made . Review of R50's undated Admitting and Discharge Record provided by the facility revealed the resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R50's Physician Orders provided by the facility revealed on 03/31/25 the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) received showers for one of two residents (Resident (R) 28) reviewed for ADLs out of 31 sampled residents. This failure placed the resident at risk for an undignified quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bath, Shower/Tub dated 06/07/24 revealed, The purpose of this procedure are [sic] to promote cleanliness, provide comfort to the resident and to observe the condition of the resident's skin. General Guidelines .5. Baths are given per bath schedule .Documentation. 1. The date and time the shower/tub baths was performed per bath schedule .5. If the resident refused the shower/tub bath, the reasons(s) . Review of R28's undated Admitting and Discharge Record, provided by the facility revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R28's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, Facility A failed to ensure one of four residents (Resident (R) 73) reviewed for pressure ulcers out of a sample of 31 residents did not develop facility acquired pressure ulcers. This failure to not identify a pressure ulcer until it was a Stage II had the potential to escalate to a higher level causing the resident pain and discomfort. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Ulcer dated 01/17 revealed, The purpose is to standardize a system-wide protocol that identifies those patients at risk for breakdown and to provide guidelines to prevent pressure ulcer occurrence .Maintain and improve tissue tolerance to pressure in order to prevent injury. All individuals at risk should have skin inspected every shift, paying particular attention to bony prominences and areas under medical devices . Review of R73's undated admission Record located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R73 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, Facility A failed to monitor a resident's bathroom door protector to ensure it did not injure the resident until the door was replaced for one of seven residents reviewed for accidents out of 31 sampled residents (Resident (R) 64). This failure had the potential to cause injury to the resident. Findings include: Review of R64's undated Face Sheet, provided by the facility, revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Type 2 diabetes mellitus with hyperglycemia, and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris. Review of R64's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 03/14/25, provided by the facility, revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. Review of the facility's Work Order, dated 04/16/25, provided by the facility, revealed The panel on the outside of the bathroom…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy, Facility B failed to assess residents for the use of bed rails, review the risks and benefits of bed rail use and obtain informed consent prior to the installation of bed rails for two of seven residents (Resident (R) 28 and R75) reviewed for accidents and hazards out of 31 sampled residents. These failures placed the residents at risk for injury and restraint. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Safety, dated 08/2019 revealed Our facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident .1. The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and the family .2. To try to prevent deaths/injuries from the beds and related equipment (including the frame, mattress, side rails .) the facility shall promote the following approaches:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of facility policy, and review of manufacturer's pharmaceutical recommendations, Facility B failed to ensure a medication error rate below five percent. During medication administration for three (Resident (R)10, R51, R108) in the medication administration observation. These failures caused three medication errors out of 25 opportunities for error, or a medication error rate of 12%. These failures had the potential to increase or decrease the effectiveness of these medications. Findings include: Observation during the medication administration observation on 05/15/25 at 11:00AM, Registered Nurse (RN)2 crushed R10's Potassium Chloride Extended Release (ER) 20 milliequivalent (mEq) one tablet, then placed in apple sauce and administered to R10. On 05/15/24 at 11:12AM, crushed R108's ferrous sulfate 300 mg one tablet, then placed in applesauce and administered to R108. On 05/15/25 at 11:31AM, crushed gabapentin, then placed in applesauce and administered to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, Facility A failed to document a resident's decline, death, and disposition of one of one resident (Resident (R) 141) reviewed for facility death out of a total sample of 31 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Legal Medical Record Policy revised 12/17/20 showed the purpose of the medical record is to provide a record of the patient's health status including observations, measurements, and history/prognosis, and serve as the document describing the healthcare services provided to the patient. Provide a method for clinical communication and care planning among the individual healthcare practitioners serving the patient. Provide supporting documentation for the reimbursement of services provided to the patient. Document and substantiate the patient's clinical care and serve as a key source of data for outcomes research and public health purposes. Serve as a major resource for healthcare practitioner education. Serve to document evidence of quality of care. Serve as the legal business record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of the policy titled Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control, facility A failed to discard expired food in the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer; label and date opened food items in the walk-in refrigerator and dry storage area; store cooking grease in proper container; ensure serving pans and bowls were stacked and stored dry; maintain an updated cleaning log; maintain the cleanliness of the icemaker; ensure the floors and walls in the walk-in refrigerator, dry storage and kitchen area were kept clean; and repair damaged ceiling in the dry storage area. The deficient practices had the potential to adversely affect 41of 44 residents who received oral diets. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Sanitation and Infection Prevention/Control revised January 2020 revealed: Food and Supply Storage - Procedures .products contain an expiration date. The words sell-by, best buy, enjoy by or use-by should not precede the date. The sell by date is the last…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, facility A failed to ensure that one of three medication carts (Long Hall medication cart) and the treatment cart was locked and secured when the cart was out of view of the nurse. Specifically, the facility A failed to ensure the treatment cart and the medication cart on the Long Hall medication cart was locked and medications secured when not in use for two of three carts. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Administering Medications with a revised date of 3/2019 revealed the policy statement of: Medications shall be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 14. During administration of medications, the mediation cart will be kept closed and locked when out of sight of the medication nurse. Observation on 5/9/23 at 9:52 a.m. of wound care treatment cart containing medications located on the Long Hall located directly in front of room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews, and review of the policy titled Self Administration of Medication, Facility A failed to ensure one resident (R) (R#110) of 51 sampled residents, was assessed to safely self-administer medications. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Self Administration of Medication revised February 2021, Policy Heading: Residents has the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 1. As part of the evaluation comprehensive assessment, the interdisciplinary team (IDT) assesses each resident's cognitive and physical abilities to determine whether self-administering medications is Safe and clinically appropriate for the resident. deemed safe and appropriate for a resident to self-administer medications is reassessed periodically based on changes on the resident's medical and/or decision-making status. 8. Self-administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and review of policy titled Dressing Change Policy, the facility failed to ensure quality of care and services in accordance with professional standards related to not receiving physician orders for treatment/wound care for one of one resident (R#65) with a cancer lesion on her right wrist. The sample size was 51. Findings include: Review of the policy titled Dressing Change Policy revised 3/2020, revealed The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Preparation: 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Documentation: Complete documentation of the dressing change procedure including photographs if taken and upload into the resident's medical record. Review of the clinical record for R#65 revealed resident was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. During the tour of Facility B on 7/27/2021 at 12:00 p.m. and 7/28/2021 at 11:30 a.m. the following was observed: In room [ROOM NUMBER] an oxygen tank filter had a large amount of dust build up. The dust buildup was found at the back of oxygen tank and had a brownish gray color. The resident of room [ROOM NUMBER] was currently using the oxygen tank when the dust buildup was observed. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] the cream-colored blinds had brown and black spots embedded into them. In room [ROOM NUMBER] there were two ceiling vents with black and brown spots. During the tour on 7/29/2021 at 8:34 a.m. in Facility B the Administrator and Maintenance Director confirmed that the blinds in rooms 204, 206, 208, and 210 had brown and black spots. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations, and review of policy titled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors and Food and Supply Storage, facility A failed to discard expired items, failed to label and date items in the refrigerator and freezer of the resident food pantry, and failed to monitor freezer temperatures for the freezer in the resident food pantry. This deficient practice affected one of one resident food pantry for facility A. Findings included: Review of Facility policy entitled Foods Brought by Family/Visitors revealed the policy statement that food brought to the facility by visitors and family is permitted. Facility staff will strive to balance resident choice and a homelike environment with the nutritional and safety needs of residents. Food brought by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later will be labeled and stored in a manner that it is clearly distinguishable from facility prepared food. A. Nonperishable foods will be stored in re-sealable containers with tight fitting lids.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-07-30 · tag F0914 — patternProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility (Facility A) failed to ensure that privacy curtains provided full visual privacy for a total of 11 of 21 resident shared bedrooms (rooms: 2, 3, 5,8, 9,14, 16, 26, 27, 28, and 29). Findings include: 1. Observation on 7/27/21at 12:28 p.m., 7/28/2021 at 9:15 a.m., 7/29/2021 at 8:49 a.m., and 7/30/2021 at 9:25 a.m. revealed short privacy curtains for room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. 2.Observation on 7/27/2021 at 8:21 a.m. ,7/28/2021 at 10:00 a.m. 7/29/2021 at 8:47 a.m., and 7/30/2021at 9:29 a.m. revealed short privacy curtains for room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A and bed B. 3. Observations on 7/29/2021 at 11:01 a.m. and 7/30/2021 at 9:31 a.m. revealed short privacy curtains for room [ROOM NUMBER] bed A. The environmental tour began on 7/30/2021 at 9:29 a.m. with the Director of Nursing, Maintenance Director (MS), and the Environmental Service Manger (EVS). The Administrator did not join the tour until the last room was observed on the last hall. During the tour the MS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, Facility A failed to maintain dignity by ensuring a dignity bag was provided for one of two residents (R) #113) who had an indwelling foley catheter. The facility sample size was 27 Residents. Findings include: Observations on 7/27/2021 at 11:49 a.m., 7/28/2021 at 9:13 a.m., 7/29/2021 at 9:20 a.m., and 7/30/2021 at 2:00 p.m. of R#113 lying in B bed with his catheter bag uncovered and visible from the doorway. Record review of R#113's medical record revealed an admission date of 6/30/2021 and an admitting diagnoses history of urinary tract infection (UTI), urinary retention for which he had an indwelling urinary catheter. Record review of his Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] included an assessment for an indwelling catheter. Further review documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 (a BIMS score of 0 to 10 indicated moderate cognitive impairment). Record review of R#113's care plan dated 4/30/2021 and last updated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interview, the facility policy titled Care Plans-Baseline, facility failed to develop a person-centered baseline care plan which included Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) interventions for one of four newly admitted residents (R) #182) at facility A. Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled Care Plans-Baseline (11/2018) documented A baseline plan of care to meet the resident 's immediate needs shall be developed for each resident within forty -eight (48) hour of admission. 1. To assure that their resident 's immediate care needs are met and maintained, a baseline care plan will be developed within forty-eight (48) hours of the resident admission. The Interdisciplinary Team will review the healthcare practitioner 's orders (dietary needs, medications routine treatment, etc.) and implement a baseline care plan to meet the resident 's immediate care needs including but not limited to. a. Initial goals based on admission orders b. physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, Facility A failed to develop a care plan for one resident (R) R#71) related to use of a knee immobilizer and skin assessments and failed to implement a care plan for one resident, R#90, related to a nutritional supplement. The sample size was 27. Findings include: 1. Review of facility policy 'Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered' revealed: 13. Assessments of residents are ongoing, and the care plans are revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. 14. The Interdisciplinary Team must review and update the care plan: a. when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition. Resident R#71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, chronic hepatitis C, and chronic congestive heart failure. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reveals a Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and staff interview facility A failed to ensure that physician orders were followed related to Magic cup being served at each meal, for one of 10 residents, (R) R#90), with an order for Magic cup. Findings include: Record Review of the clinical record revealed a [AGE] year-old female with a primary diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease, other diagnoses included but not limited to, adult failure to thrive, anorexia, Gastro-esophageal reflux disease, Diverticulosis of intestine, orbital wasting of fat tissue, age-related cognitive decline, chronic pain, weakness, anxiety disorder unspecified, major depressive disorder recurrent moderate, personal history of malignant neoplasm of bladder, personal history of malignant neoplasm of skin, need for assistance, encounter for palliative care, and history of COVID-19. Further record review revealed physicians' orders including but not limited to, pureed consistency diet, nectar thick liquids, meal supplement-Magic Cup with breakfast, lunch,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-07-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Catheter Care, Urinary the facility (Facility A) failed to ensure that the urinary drainage for R#113 was positioned lower than the level of the bladder to prevent unobstructed urine flow and tension for one resident (R#113). The sample size was 27 Residents. Findings include: Record review of facility policy titled, Catheter Care, Urinary (Revised September 2014) stated The purpose of this procedure is to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections. Maintaining Unobstructed Flow 1. Check the resident frequently to be sure he or she is not lying on the catheter and to keep the catheter and tubing free of kinks. 3. The urinary drainage bag must be held or positioned lower than the bladder at all times to prevent the urine in the tubing and drainage bag from flowing back into the urinary bladder'. Record review of R#113's medical record revealed an admission date of 6/30/2021 and an admitting diagnoses of malignant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, staff interview, and the facility policy Storage of Medication, facility A failed to ensure disposal of expired medications and supplies by appropriate expiration dates on one of the two medication carts and one of the one medication storage unit room. The facility census was 137 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Storage of Medications (Revised March 2019) revealed 'The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Drug containers that have missing, incomplete, improper, or incorrect labels shall be returned to the pharmacy for proper labeling before storing. The Facility shall not use discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated drugs or biologicals. All such drugs shall be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed.' Finding include: Observation on 7/29/2021 at 10:39 a.m. of the facility 'A's medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) GG revealed the following expired medications and items: 1. Six bottles of Blood Culture Vials two with expiration date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, and review of the Department of Public Health Interim Guidance for Long-Term Care (LTC) Facilities Admitting Residents from a Hospital the facility (Facility A) failed to ensure that the door to the room, for one of one unvaccinated resident (R#182) on Transmission Based Precautions for MRSA (Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus) and as a newly admitted resident was kept closed at all times. In addition, the facility failed sanitize one of three Hoyer lifts between resident use and failed to use separate gauze or cloths during wound care. Findings include: 1. Record review of document titled, The Department of Public Health Interim Guidance for Long-Term Care (LTC) Facilities Admitting Residents from a Hospital originated December 24, 2020 documented Recommendation for residents admitted to LTC (Long Term Care) facilities, according to COVID-19 status .admitted residents who are neither known to have COVID 19, nor suspected to have it, should be placed on Transmission Based precautions in an observation area or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,345 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $6,500 — penalty dated 2025-02-11
- $10,845 — penalty dated 2025-02-11
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| RUBENDALL, STEPHEN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/10/2025 |
| BRAMBLETT, KAREN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| CARNLINE, JOE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| CASON, ASHLEY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| CRAVEN, DARCY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| DAWSON, MARVIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| GRIFFITH, SINA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| HAMIL, WILLIAM | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/28/2023 |
| NESMITH, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| PORTER, JAMI | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| SANTORO, JACQUELYN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| SIMMONS, JOSH | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 01/01/2023 |
| STONE, HENRY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| SZWARC, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| WENTWORTH, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | since 10/01/2021 |
| BURNETTE, JASON | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2025 |
| COLLINS, ANDREA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/25/2025 |
| DANIELS, CHRISTOPHER | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2025 |
| GARDNER, LIBBY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/05/2022 |
| HEMBREE, GREGORY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 12/05/2016 |
| PEARCE, CARLA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 10/01/2021 |
| WARD, TIMOTHY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | since 02/25/2025 |
| WOMACK, JAMES | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2023 |
| JOHN D ARCHBOLD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 10/01/1990 |
| BARRETT, PATRICIA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/16/1991 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115266. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.