Carrollton Crossing of Journey LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.01 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 0% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 159 beds and averages 98.3 residents a day — about 62% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.22 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.40 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.84 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.37 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.36 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 100% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to act upon a change of condition for one of 28 sampled residents (R) (263) related to low blood sugar, which resulted in being transferred to the hospital for treatment. This failure to provide quick intervention led to harm being identified on 12/29/2023, when R263's blood sugar went so low, to the point where the resident was unresponsive and slow to respond to the emergency use of Glucagon intramuscular when administered at the facility. R263 had to be transferred to the emergency room (ER). Findings included: 1. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R263 had been admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. A review of R263's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/6/2023 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of four out of 15, which indicated R263 was severely cognitively impaired. R263 was also coded as taking…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to protect one of three sampled residents' (R) (R1) rights to be free from physical and verbal abuse by a staff member when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) NN struck R1 while providing care. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, revised 03/05/2024, included, It is the policy of this facility to provide protection for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. Further review revealed the Definitions section included Physical Abuse includes, but is not limited to hitting, slapping, punching, biting, and kicking. It also includes controlling behavior through corporal punishment. Verbal Abuse means the use of oral, written or gestured…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, the facility failed to store, handle, and serve food in a safe and sanitary manner by failing to: ensure expired food items were discarded; ensure food items were properly labeled and dated; properly store raw meat to prevent cross-contamination; maintain food storage areas in a clean condition; properly store food off the floor; ensure equipment and surfaces were maintained in a sanitary condition; and ensure meal tray carts were covered during transport. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 94 residents who receive food orally by placing them at increased risk for foodborne illness, contamination, and infection.Findings included:A review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, revealed the policy, dated revised 1/4/2024, to read in part:Regarding food labeling, dating, and storage: Labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including, but not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled Routine Cleaning and Disinfection, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, and comfortable home-like environment related to dusty grayish buildup on packaged terminal air conditioner (PTAC) units in one of four halls (300 Hall).Findings included:During an observation on the 300 Hall on 4/7/2026 from 10:40 am until 11:40 am and on 4/8/2026 at 8:55 am, two rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] and room [ROOM NUMBER]) were observed with an excessive amount of dusty grayish buildup on PTAC units. During an interview on 4/8/2026 at 11:38 am, the Maintenance Director (MD) confirmed that the maintenance department services the PTAC units. He stated that he has one maintenance assistant tasked with cleaning the PTAC units throughout the facility, and cleaning the units should occur monthly. The MD verified that he does not implement any procedures in the electronic maintenance system. He utilizes a paper log.During an interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Consulting Physician/Practitioner Orders and Provision of Quality of Care, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two of 48 sampled resdients (R) (R2 and R48) related to ensuring that physician orders were in place to provide standard of care concerning: 1) catheter care, in that a physician order was not in place for indwelling Foley catheter and catheter care for R2 resulting in approximately 85 days of catheter care provided without a corresponding physician order; and 2) documentation and assessment of bowel movements and risk for bowel impaction for R48 resulting in the resident to be hospitalized for a 24-hour period for nausea and vomiting that was caused by a bowel impaction. These deficient practices had the potential to place residents at increased risk for catheter-associated urinary tract infection (UTI),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Program, the facility failed to provide restorative services for one of three sampled residents (R) (R86) related to splinting and range of motion (ROM) services.Findings included:During an observation on 4/7/2026 at 8:30 am, R86 was observed resting in bed with her left hand resting on her stomach. Her hand was closed and appeared to be contracted. No splint was observed.During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 10:30 am, R86 was observed in a reclining chair near the nursing station. Her left hand was contracted, and she was holding it on her lap. No splint was observed.During an observation on 4/9/2026 at 2:00 pm, R86 was observed in a reclining chair. Her left hand was in her lap. The left hand was closed in toward her palm, her fingernails were pressing into skin, and her wrist was turned inward. No splint was observed. A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R86 was admitted to the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate safety interventions were implemented and followed for one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R11) by failure to ensure the resident wore a smoking apron while smoking. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for burns and other accident hazards related to smoking injuries.Findings included:A review of facility policy titled Protocol: Smoking, undated, revealed in the designated smoking area section, fire extinguishers/smoking blanket will be available in designated smoking areas. Smoke-Free Facility -Grandfathered in Policy Acknowledgement provided dating 4/9/2026.A review of R11's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of intracapsular fracture of the right femur, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, major depressive disorder, acute respiratory failure, and contracture of the right ankle.A review of R11's EMR titled Smoker…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies titled Oxygen Administration and Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure that three of 11 sampled residents (R) (R45, R104, and R56) received respiratory care as ordered related to oxygen therapy and a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BIPAP) machine.Findings included:1. During an observation on 4/7/2026 at 11:41 am and on 4/8/2026 at 8:55 am, R45 was observed receiving oxygen therapy via a nasal canula at the flow rate of between 3.0 and 3.5 liters (L). In addition, the oxygen concentrator filter was observed to have a gray-like dust build-up. During an observation and interview on 4/8/2026, at 9:52 am, Registered Nurse (RN) BB confirmed the concentrator filter had a considerable accumulation of dust-like particles. RN BB stated that R45 has been diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which includes symptoms of shortness of breath and hypoxia. She stated that the concentrator filters…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication rate was less than 5 percent (%) related to four errors with thirty-two opportunities. The medication error rate was 12.5%.Findings included:During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 7:50 am, Registered Nurse (RN) FF was observed administering R2 scheduled 9:00 am medications through her gastrostomy tube (G-tube). RN FF prepared two medications; three were scheduled at this time. The 325 milligrams (mg) aspirin enteric coated (EC) could not be crushed, and a non-EC aspirin was not available. RN FF confirmed that she did notify the Director of Nursing (DON), and that a new order was obtained for a chewable aspirin that was given late.During an observation on 4/8/2026 at 8:23 am, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) AA was in 300 Hall. LPN AA was observed obtaining medication for R23. Three medications for R23 were unavailable: Bumex (diuretic), metoprolol (blood pressure), and citalopram (antidepressant). LPN AA stated that it looks like the medications had been ordered prior. Overflow…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene when performing resident care, including Foley catheter care and wound care, for one of 48 sampled residents (R) (R2). This deficient practice had the potential to cause the spread of infection to other areas of the residents' bodies and infection to staff.Findings included:During a review of the electronic medical record (EMR), it was revealed that resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and pertinent diagnoses, including but not limited to Cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, atherosclerotic heart disease, depression, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective disorder.During a review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, it was revealed that a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not attempted, which indicated R2 was severely cognitively impaired; that R2 is dependent on staff for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, the facility failed to protect one of 14 sampled residents (R) (R3) right to be free from sexual abuse from R5. This deficient practice created the potential for R3 and other residents to experience further potential abuse. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property Policy, reviewed 9/2024, read, in pertinent part, It is the policy of the facility to prevent abuse.1. Review of R3's admission Record, dated 9/9/2025 and found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included dementia and type 2 diabetes. Review of R3's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 7/8/2025 and found in the EMR under the MDS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$3,728 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-12-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $533K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA