Muscogee Manor & Rehabilitation Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 196 beds and averages 84.6 residents a day — about 43% occupied, or roughly 111 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.39 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.15 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.60 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.59 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2026-02-22 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-administered Medication, Treatments, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R) (R57) of 42 sampled residents swallowed medication before leaving the resident's room. This deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of clinical complications. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Self-administered Medication, Treatments reviewed 06/20/2023, documented under Policy Statement: Self-administered medications and treatments must be carefully monitored and recorded in Medication Administration Record (MAR) and Treatment Administration Record (TAR) and Self-administration of medications or treatments by residents is permitted by a physician order that includes dosage, route, and any special instructions.A review of the clinical record for R57 revealed an admission date of 11/02/2016 with diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified bipolar disorder, current episode mixed, severe, with psychotic features ,vascular dementia, unspecified severity,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Privacy Policy, Medication Administration General Guidelines, and Electronic Medical Records, the facility failed to ensure that private, clinical information was not visible to unauthorized staff, other residents, and visitors for three of 42 sampled residents (R) (R51, R62, and R43) and one of three medication carts. This deficient practice had the potential to place R51, R62, R43, and other residents at risk for protected health information to be viewed by unauthorized individuals. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Privacy Policy, revised 09/10/2023, documented under the Policy: The nursing facility industries recognize their responsibility to keep information about you secure and confidential. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines dated 01/2025, documented under Medication Administration: . 18. Resident's health information needs to remain private. Medication Administration Records [MARs] containing resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive care plan related to oxygen and medication parameters for two residents (R) (R62 and R70) from a sample of 42 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of clinical complications for R62 and R70. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plan Policy reviewed September 2025, documented under Procedure: 6. It is the responsibility of the Care Plan Coordinator to review timely a resident's status and any change in needs following a hospital stay or any other unexpected event as deemed appropriate. It is also the responsibility of the Care Plan Coordinator to ensure concerns/changes for a resident's care plan is updated. 7. It is the responsibility to review timely a resident's status and any change in needs following a hospital stay or any other unexpected event as deemed appropriate. 1. Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and the facility policy titled Medication Administration Subcutaneous Insulin, the facility failed to follow physician ordered protocol for finger stick blood sugar results and failed to accurately administer insulin from a pen device for two residents (R) (R83 and R51) from a sample of 25 residents receiving insulin. The deficient practice increased the risk of poor clinical outcomes. Findings include:1. Review of the facility protocol titled Dr. (name) Insulin Protocol dated 08/08/2024, documented under Monitoring: 3) Call MD {Medical Doctor} for FSBS that are <50 mg/dl.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R83 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The resident had a diagnosis of but not limited to Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and was receiving insulin.Review of a Physician Order dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-22 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy Guidelines, the facility failed to ensure that one of 11 residents (R) (R70) receiving oxygen was administered oxygen therapy in accordance with the physician orders. This deficient practice had the potential to place R70 at risk for respiratory complications and a diminished quality life.Findings include:Record review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Therapy Guidelines, revised 12/05/2025 documented, The following guidelines will be adhered to in all oxygen therapy patients at all times for any resident receiving oxygen therapy, and those orders will be followed. Water bottles, or humidifiers may be used in conjunction with oxygen concentrators up to 6 liters of flow via nasal cannula. It is not required that these devices be used if the liter flow is 2 LPM {liters per minute} or less unless the patients request it or there are visible signs of drying out of the nasal passages (blood -tinged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice when administering medications for one resident (R) (R62) from a sample of 42 residents. The deficient practice had the potential to increase the risk of poor clinical outcomes. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated 01/2025, documented Medication Administration 2. Obtain and record any vital signs as necessary prior to medication administration. In addition, 20. The resident is always observed after administration to ensure that the dose was completely ingested. If only a partial dose is ingested, this is noted on the MAR (medication administration record), and action taken as appropriate.Review of the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) documented R62 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis included but not limited to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to place open dates on two bottles of glucose test strips in two of four medication carts. This deficient practice had the potential to cause abnormal blood sugar readings and worsening of the residents' medical conditions.Findings include:Review of the facility's documents demonstrated a policy was requested from the facility for blood sugar strips however no policy was provided.Observation and interview on 02/21/2026 at 1:27 PM during review of the medication cart 1 on the [NAME] Wing revealed one bottle of blood sugar test strips was in the cart with no open dates. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) DD was present during the review and confirmed the bottle of blood sugar test strips had no open date.Observation and interview on 02/21/2026 at 1:43 PM during review of the medication cart 2 on the [NAME] Wing revealed one bottle of blood sugar test strips were in the cart with no open dates. LPN EE was present during the review and confirmed the bottle of blood sugar test strips had no open date. Record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Food Storage, Floor Stock, and Accepting Food Deliveries, the facility failed to ensure proper labeling and storage of food with open and expiration dates, failed to discard food items by the expiration dates, and failed to properly cover opened food items. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 85 residents who received food orally. Findings included: Review of facility's policy titled, Food Storage dated 2021, revealed under section titled Procedure: 2. Food should be dated as it is placed on the shelves if required by state regulation. 3. Date marking should be visible on all high-risk food to indicate the date by which a ready-to-eat, TCS food should be consumed, sold, or discarded. Refrigerated Food Storage: 2. All foods should be covered, labeled, and dated and routinely monitored to assure that foods (including leftovers) will be consumed by their safe use by dates, or frozen (where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directive Policy, and review of the facility's admission Agreement-Statement of Acknowledgement, the facility failed to provide residents or resident representatives written information regarding choices and the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment for one of seven sampled residents (R) (R56). This deficient practice had the potential to affect the resident or representative's ability to make informed decisions about their care. Findings included: Review of the policy titled, Advance Directive Policy, reviewed/revised date 11/21/2024 revealed under Policy Statement: It is the policy of [facility name] to establish, implement and maintain written policies and procedures for advance directive. Each resident with a decision-making capacity has the right to make their own decisions related to his/her medical care. An integral component of self-determination is the right to make choices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to submit for a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II for a mental health diagnosis for one of 33 residents (R) (R82). This deficient practice had the potential for R82 not receive services and/or care according to his needs. Findings included: The facility revealed they did not have a policy on PASARR. Record review for R82 revealed pertinent diagnoses/conditions included secondary malignant neoplasm of bone (primary diagnosis), vascular dementia (12/7/2020), anxiety disorder, and psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition (4/27/2023). Review of Physician Orders included and order for treatment and evaluation as needed with [name] behavioral health services, refer to [name] related to cognitive decline, and Consult: Psychiatric/Psychology Services evaluation and treat as needed. Interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:00 am the Social Service Director (SSD) revealed clinical information was entered into the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-09 for 34 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $250K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA