River Towne Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

40.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 82 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 210 beds and averages 133.5 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 76 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.14 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.83 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.44 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.54 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.39 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 60% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2023-10-12 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel (HCP) During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, and review of the job description for the Administrator, the facility Administration failed to ensure the health and safety of the residents by not maintaining an effective Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP) that would identify and investigate an infection outbreak to prevent or reduce the spread of Covid-19 by not following current guidelines for resident and staff testing (contact tracing or broad based testing). This failure resulted in a total of five residents and two staff members who tested positive for COVID-19. The facility census was 131. On 10/4/2023, a determination was made that a situation in which the facilities noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused, or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, serious…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Health Care Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic, and review of the facility's COVID -19 Response, the facility failed to implement initial and ongoing testing of residents and staff as recommended by the CDC to lessen the exposure of COVID-19 during an outbreak, failed to ensure source control was used during outbreak, ensure the safety of all residents in the facility by not following current guidelines related to COVID-19 for resident and staff testing, infection control, monitoring and documenting COVID-19 symptoms for residents, notification of staff and family of outbreak status during an outbreak and source control that resulted in five residents (R)(R15, R89, R94, R111, and R433) and two staff testing positive for COVID-19. On 10/4/2023, a determination was made that a situation in which the facilities…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Medication Therapy, the facility failed to ensure residents or resident representatives were informed in advance of the risks and benefits of a prescribed psychotropic medication or an alternative treatment for two of three residents (Resident (R) 46, and R61) reviewed. This failure had the potential for residents to receive the medication without informed consent or understanding of the treatment, and/or alternative treatment available. Findings include: Review of R46's admission Record, in the electronic medical record (EMR), under the Admissions tab revealed R46 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R46's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/20/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R46 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine of 15, indicating she had moderately impaired cognition. Review of R46's Resident Medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review titled Environment, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner for one of one kitchen affecting 103 residents who consume food from the kitchen. This failure had the potential to contribute to contamination and infection control concerns. During a kitchen observation, alongside the Dietary Manager (DM), on 04/01/26 at 6:02 AM, a large section of non-slip flooring in front of the steam table was worn through to show the underneath tile, and some missing grout for the tile.-Two sections of non-slip flooring in front of the three-pan sink were worn through, showing the underneath tile and concrete. The sections were flooded with standing water.-Underneath the steamer, there was broken and worn non-slip flooring to reveal exposed tile.-A long section of broken, worn-through non-slip flooring at the drink station revealed rocky concrete/ tile areas and was flooded with water.-The non-slip flooring in front of the dish machine had broken, worn sections revealing the underneath…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Administering Medications, the facility failed to administer medications timely for one of six residents (Resident (R) 141) reviewed for medications out of a total sample of 38 residents. This failure had the potential to alter the effectiveness of the medication with the potential for overdosing if medications were given too close together. Findings include: Review of R141's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 06/21/25. The resident had diagnoses which included anemia, encounter for orthopedic aftercare following surgical amputation, and muscle weakness. Review of R141's discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an assessment reference date (ARD) date of 06/21/25 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not conducted and the staff assessment for mental status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility pharmacy services failed to ensure medication irregularities were identified and addressed when ordered medications were not available for administration for one resident (Resident (R) 147) out of four newly admitted residents reviewed for medication irregularities. This failure had the potential to result in a decline of the resident's condition due to missed medication. Findings include: Review of R147's Admissions Record, located under the Admissions tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R147 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses to include acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, hyperlipidemia, and tracheostomy. Review of R147's Physician Orders, dated [DATE] and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed R147 was prescribed Budesonide Inhalation Suspension 9.5 via trach two times a day for the diagnosis of respiratory failure. The physician orders also…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, the facility failed to ensure food items were discarded upon expiration. This deficient practice had the potential to promote foodborne illnesses in the 110 residents receiving an oral diet from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Receiving and Storage, dated November 2022, revealed that the Policy Statement stated, Foods shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. During a tour of the kitchen on 4/22/2025, beginning at 9:50 am with the Dietary Manager (DM), observations revealed: One container of ground allspice seasoning with an expiration date of 7/19/2024. One container of ground ginger seasoning with an expiration date of 8/31/2023. One box of French-style dressing packets with an expiration date of 2/24/2025. One box of gelatin expired 9/5/2024. Observations of the walk-in cooler with the DM revealed: Two boxes of cabbage with expiration dates of 3/18/2025 and 4/17/2025. One container…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observations, staff and family interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for two of 49 sampled residents (R) (R70 and R385). This deficient practice had the potential to place R70 and R385 at risk of unmet needs, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised March 2022, revealed the Policy Statement stated A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section included, . 2. The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS assessment . 7. The comprehensive, person-centered…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, the facility failed to ensure that two of 49 sampled residents (R) (R12 and R43) received activities of daily living (ADL) care related to receiving scheduled showers to maintain good personal hygiene. This deficient practice had the potential to place R12 and R43 at risk of being unclean and feeling insecure about their appearance. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting, revised 3/2018, revealed the Policy Statement stated, Residents will be provided with care, treatment, and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. The Policy Interpretation and Implementation section included, . 2. Appropriate care and services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure an environment free from accident hazards on one of seven medication carts and in three of 49 sampled residents' (R) (R12, R87, and R36) rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to place the residents at risk of accident hazards. Findings include: 1. Observation 4/22/2025 9:37 am of the medication cart located on the 200 Hall revealed an unpackaged three cubic centimeter (cc) syringe, with an uncapped needle attached, lying on top of a biohazard container attached to the medication cart. In a concurrent observation and interview on 4/22/2025 at 9:46 am, Registered Nurse (RN) MM verified the syringe location. She stated the syringe should have been placed completely in the biohazard container. She further stated there was a potential for a resident to pick up the syringe with the attached needle and have an adverse outcome. In an interview on 4/22/2025 at 9:50 am, Unit Manager (UM) CC revealed that syringes and needles should be disposed of by placing them completely inside the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, resident family interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, the facility failed to provide pain management for one of 49 sampled residents (R) (R385). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pain Assessment and Management, revised 10/2022, revealed the General Guidelines section included, 1. The pain management program is based on a facility-wide commitment to appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, based on professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan, and the resident's choices related to pain management. 5. Acute pain (or significant worsening of chronic pain) should be assessed every 30 to 60 minutes after the onset and reassessed as indicated until relief is obtained. The Steps in the Procedure section included, Assessing Pain 1. Assess the resident at admission and during ongoing assessments to help identify the resident who is experiencing pain or for whom pain may be anticipated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded after the expiration date in one of two medication rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of receiving medications with altered effectiveness. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage, revised February 2023, revealed the Policy Interpretation and Implementation Medication Storage section included, . 3. If the facility has discontinued, outdated, or deteriorated medications or biologicals, the dispensing pharmacy is contacted for instructions regarding returning or destroying these items. Observations on 4/23/2025 at 4:53 pm in the [NAME] Side Medication Storage Room revealed three boxes of bisacodyl suppositories expired 1/2025, one opened container of Tylenol 325 milligrams (mg) expired 11/25/2024, and three containers of Renavite expired 10/2023 were stored with other unexpired medications on the storage shelves. In an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$24,387 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $24,387 — penalty dated 2023-10-12
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-07-09 for 2 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA