Crisp Regional Nsg & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 143 beds and averages 79.7 residents a day — about 56% occupied, or roughly 63 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.91 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, the facility failed to ensure residents/representatives/guardians were informed of and provided written notice of the right to accept or decline medical and surgical treatments and their right to formulate an advance directive for two of two residents (R) (R18 and R79) reviewed.Findings include:Review of R18's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed no documented evidence or signed statement of acknowledgment that the resident and his/her representative were informed or received written information advising of their right to accept or decline medical and surgical treatments and to formulate an Advance Directive.Review of the EMR revealed R18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R18's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating no cognitive impairment.Review R79's EMR revealed no documented evidence or signed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, LTC (long term care) Care Plan, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for four of 45 sampled residents (R) (R1, R79, R3, and R62). The facility failed to develop the comprehensive care plan for foley catheter for R1 and R62, dialysis care plan for R3, and activities of daily living (ADLs) care plan for R79. This deficient practice had the potential to cause adverse health outcomes, including increased risk of infection related to unmanaged Foley catheter care, complications or missed treatments associated with dialysis needs, decline in functional status due to lack of appropriate ADL support, and overall diminished quality of care and resident well-being due to the absence of individualized, comprehensive care planning.Findings Include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled LTC Care Plan undated, documented under Policy: . LTC Care Plan Intent: It is the policy of the facility to promote…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled, Foley Catheter Care Policy (Long-Term Care), the facility failed to have order with indication for Foley catheter, and failed to have diagnosis for Foley catheter for one of 12 sampled residents (R) R62 with Foley catheters. This deficient practice had the potential to cause complications and improper care management related to Foley catheter.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Foley Catheter Care Policy (Long-Term Care) dated 06/11/2021 documented 1. Purpose: To ensure safe management of indwelling urinary (Foley) catheters, prevent complications such as Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection, and promote resident comfort and dignity. 2. Policy Statement: Indwelling urinary catheters will be used only when medically necessary, maintained using aseptic technique, and removed as soon as clinically appropriate. All staff will follow evidence-based infection prevention practices.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility's policy titled, LTC- Medication Storage, Medication Administration, Insulin and Insulin Pen Management, Medication Open Date and Eye Drop (Ophthalmic Medication), the facility failed to lock one of four medication carts on the 100 hall and failed to place open dates on two vials of multidose insulin for two residents (R) R66 and R1, two medicated eyedrops for R81 and R63, one insulin pen for R90 and one bottle of blood glucose strips. This deficient practice had the potential to cause unauthorized access to medications and ineffectiveness of medications with no open dates for the residents.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled LTC- Medication Storage reviewed December 2025 documented Policy Subject: Medication Storage: 1. Medications must only be accessible to authorized staff, and locked when not under the direct observation of authorized staff, d. The medication cart should always be locked unless in use.Review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policies titled, Infection Control Hand Hygiene Trach Care and Foley Catheter Care, the facility failed to ensure adherence to standard infection control practices, including hand hygiene, maintenance of a clean field, proper PPE use during tracheostomy (trach) care for one of 13 sampled residents (R) R41 with tracheostomy, and failed to ensure appropriate catheter care technique, in accordance with accepted standards of practice for one of 12 sampled R (R62) with foley catheter. This deficient practice had the potential to cause infection, medical complications and improper management care.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Infection Control Hand Hygiene dated March 2023 documented Purpose: Guideline for Isolation Precautions: Preventing Transmission of Infectious Agents in Healthcare Setting: 1. Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water for the following clinical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-09-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain the garbage storage area in a sanitary manner by ensuring dumpster lids were closed, failed to ensure the surrounding area was free from trash and standing water, failed to ensure one of three dumpsters was in good condition by not leaking. This practice had the potential to attract insects/rodents, and the potential for transmission of disease through the harborage and feeding of pests and carrying microorganisms into the facility. Findings include: Observation on 9/12/2023 at 9:40 a.m., and again that afternoon at 5:00 p.m., revealed two of three dumpsters with large bags of garbage inside with the lid open and trash on the ground. The dumpsters were visible by the survey team from inside the conference room. Observation on 9/13/2023 at 8:13 a.m. revealed two dumpsters containing large bags of garbage inside with the lid open and trash on the ground, visible from inside the conference room. Another observation at 9:12 a.m. of the dumpster area revealed additional bags of trash had been piled on top of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policies, titled LTC- Oxygen, and LTC Care Plan- Resident's Right to Participate, the facility failed to ensure that a care plan was developed for three of 29 sampled residents (R13, R23 and R61). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R13 had a care plan that addressed the use of a foley catheter, failed to ensure there was a care plan that addressed oxygen use for R23, and failed to ensure that R61 had a care plan that addressed dialysis treatments that were utilized. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled, LTC- Oxygen dated 8/2023 revealed under Policy Subject: Oxygen 1. There must be a physician ' s order for oxygen use which includes the route and liter flow or specific oxygen concentration, and how long the oxygen is to be administered. 3. When the unit nurse initiates oxygen therapy for a resident, he/she must: a. guarantee the provider ' s order is populated to the TAR with modifications as needed.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies titled, LTC- Aerosol Administration and LTC- Oxygen. The facility failed to properly store respiratory equipment and ensure oxygen (02) was administered as ordered by the physician for two (2) of nine (9) residents (R) (R22 and R28). Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R22 humidifier bottle was changes according to the physicians order, the facility also failed to ensure the nebulizer mask for R28 was stored and labeled properly, deficient practice had the potential to increase the probability of R22 and R28 contracting a Respiratory infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, LTC- Aerosol Administration last revised 11/2021 revealed under Purpose: To deliver aerosol medications to restore and maintain normal function of the mucociliary escalator, improve efficiency of cough mechanism, provide bronchodilator therapy, and deliver other medications to the airway. 6. Empty any residual liquid and place the nebulizer on a plastic patient bag. Review of the facility policy titled, LTC- Oxygen…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in GA