Spalding Post Acute LLC
415 Airport Road, Griffin, GA 30224 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 148 certified beds · (770) 227-8636 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0570)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (56%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.0% | 15.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.3% | 5.6% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.9% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 17.4% | 11.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 3.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.4% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.1% | 20.5% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.2% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.9% | 5.6% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.9% | 15.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 3.9% | 19.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 2.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 78.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.1% | 25.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.3% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.01 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.24 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 32.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 52 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.8%CMS range 28.7–60.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.5–17.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 32.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 30.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 79.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 92.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 5.0–13.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 132.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.09 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.29 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.70 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.25 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policies titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, and Infection Prevention and Control Program, the facility failed to implement infection control protocol for two residents (R) (R34 and R82) of 14 residents observed for infection control. Specifically, nurse did not sanitize hands between glove change and nurse placed a tablet in her bare hand. The deficient practice increased the risk of cross contamination and the spread of infection to residents and staff. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene undated, documented Policy Statement: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of infections. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 2. All personnel shall follow the handwashing/hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. 7. Use an alcohol-based hand rub containing at least 62% alcohol; or,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review and review of the facility's policy titled Medication: Self Administration and Bedside Medication Storage, the facility failed to remove one inhaler from the bedside of one resident (R) (R94) of 54 sampled residents. This deficient practice increased the risk of clinical complications. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication: Self Administration reviewed December 2021 documented POLICY: Patients who request to self-administer medications will be assessed for capability. If it is determined that the patient is able to self-administer: A physician/mid-level provider order is required. Self-administration must be care planned. Patients must be provided with a secure, locked area to maintain medications. Patient must be instructed in self-administration. Periodic evaluation of capability must be performed. PURPOSE: To provide a safe, effective process for patient self-administration of medication.Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, review of facility documentation, and review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure three residents (R) (R158, R140, and R59) of four residents reviewed were free from abuse. Specifically, R158 experienced physical abuse from a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and R140 and R59 experienced emotional abuse by another resident. The deficient practice had the potential to affect resident psychosocial health and safety. Findings include:1. Review of the Facility Incident Report Form dated 11/21/2025 at 1:00 AM (Incident #202513043) revealed an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse in which R159 stated that he witnessed CNA AA kick R158 in the foot and leg while he was lying on the floor of the bathroom. Continued review of the initial report revealed that CNA AA was placed on suspension pending the outcome of the investigation and the staff were educated on the abuse policy and reporting requirements. Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation, the facility failed to ensure three of three residents (R) (R94, R89 and R37) were free from misappropriation of medication when narcotic medications were signed out and not administered. This deficient practice increased the risk of adverse clinical outcomes.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation reviewed 01/01/2025 documented Policy Statement: It is the organization's intention to prevent the occurrence of abuse, neglect, exploitation, injuries of unknown origin, and misappropriation of resident property, and to assure that all alleged violations of federal or State laws which involve abuse, neglect, exploitation, injuries of unknown origin and misappropriation of resident property are investigated, and reported immediately to the Facility Administrator, the State Survey Agency, and other appropriate State and local agencies in accordance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Falls Management and Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plans the facility failed to implement the care plan interventions to keep one resident (R) (R125) from a sample of 12 residents, free from avoidable falls. The deficient practice increased the risk of falls with injury.Findings include:Review of the facility policy undated and titled Falls Management, documented under Policy Standards .2. Develop individualized plan of care 3. Review and revise care plan regularly. Fall Prevention Ideas: Patients unable to transfer self: Mats at bedside. Fall out of W/C {wheelchair}: Keep wheelchair unlocked if resident has a need to move.Review of the facility policy titled, Minimum Data Set (MDS)/Care Plans dated 02/01/2024 documented under Procedure: . 2. The interdisciplinary team will develop and implement the Comprehensive Care Plan within 21 days of admission. The comprehensive care plan will address resident goals, actual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews and review of the facility's policies titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/ Care Plans and Advance Directives, the facility failed to update the care plan for Advance Directives of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) for one resident (R) (R94) of 54 residents reviewed for advance directives. This deficient practice had the potential to cause staff to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and all other necessary, life-sustaining treatments for cardiac and/or respiratory arrestFindings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Minimum Data Set (MDS)/ Care Plans reviewed [DATE] documented Policy Statement: Each resident will have an individualized interdisciplinary plan of care in place. The Comprehensive Care Plan will be reviewed and revised on a quarterly basis. Procedure: 2. This comprehensive care plan will address resident goals, actual and potential problems, needs, strengths and individual preferences of the resident. 3. Each discipline will be responsible for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled Accidents/Incidents, and Falls Management, the facility failed to provide supervision for the prevention of falls for one resident (R) (R125) from a sample of five residents reviewed for falls and accidents. The deficient practice increased the risk of avoidable falls and injury.Findings include:A review of the facility policy undated and titled Accidents/Incidents, documented An accident is defined as any unexpected or unintentional incident which may result in injury or illness to a resident/patient. This does not include adverse outcomes that are a direct consequence of treatment or care that is provided in accordance with current standards of practice (e.g., drug side effects or reaction). An incident is defined as any occurrence not consistent with the routine operation of the Center or normal care of the patient. An incident can involve a visitor or staff member, malfunctioning equipment, or observation of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interviews and review of the facility's policies titled Storage of Medications, and Medication Administration, the facility failed to record an open date on one bottle of blood sugar strips in one medication cart and failed to lock one medication cart from the six medication carts reviewed for medication storage. This deficient practice had the potential to cause inaccurate blood sugar readings for the residents and unauthorized access of the medication cart with increased risk of diversion. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications, revised [DATE] documented Policy Statement: The facility shall store all drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure, and orderly manner. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: 7. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-17 · tag F0570 — widespreadAssure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Patient/Resident Trust Funds, the facility failed to maintain a Surety Bond in an adequate amount to cover the resident trust fund account balance for six of six months reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to adversely affect the finances of 84 residents with trust fund accounts managed by the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Patient/Resident Trust Funds, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy section included, It is the policy of this healthcare center to maintain all resident trust fund money, except for petty cash, in one interest-bearing checking account. Review of the facility's Surety Bond revealed the penal sum of $85,207.06. The bond stated, The liability of the surety for any and all losses incurred under this bond shall not exceed the stated penal sum. Review of a facility-provided invoice revealed the Resident Personal Fund Bond was effective from 4/21/2024 to 4/21/2025, and the bond amount was $85,207.06. Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespreadEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medication, the facility failed to ensure there were no expired medications in two of two medication storage rooms. The deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of receiving expired medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medication, dated 1/2025, revealed the Procedures section included . 14. Outdated, contaminated, discontinued or deteriorated medications and those in containers that are cracked, soiled, or without secure closures are immediately removed from stock, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy, if a current order exists. On 2/16/2025 at 10:45 am, observation of the Gardenia Hall medication storage room with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) BB revealed the following: Three containers of mineral oil lubricant laxative with an expiration date of 11/19/2024. Three containers of iron supplement liquid with an expiration date of 9/2024. Two containers of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 21 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Catheter Care, and Quality of Life-Dignity, the facility failed to promote, maintain, and protect residents' dignity for one of five residents (R) (R475) with an indwelling urinary catheter. This failure had the potential to diminish R475's quality of life in an environment that promotes the maintenance or enhancement of each resident's quality of life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Catheter Care, dated 7/1/2024, revealed the Policy section stated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters receive appropriate catheter care and maintain their dignity and privacy when indwelling catheters are in use. The Policy Explanation section included, . 2. Privacy bags will be available and catheter drainage bags will be covered at all times when in use. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Quality of Life-Dignity revealed the Policy Statement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, the facility failed to ensure that one of 51 sampled residents (R) (R55) was assessed for safe medication self-administration before allowing medications to be stored at the bedside. This deficient practice had the potential to place R55 at risk of self-administering medications in an unsafe manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medications by Patients/Residents, reviewed 1/1/2025, revealed the Policy statement included, Each resident who desires to self-administer medication is permitted to do so if the healthcare center's Licensed Nurse/Registered Nurse and physician have determined that the practice would be safe for the resident and other residents of the healthcare center. The section titled Procedure included . 2. If the resident or family member desires to self-administer medications, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriations, the facility failed to ensure pre-employment screenings, specifically a background check for one employee and a background check and fingerprints for one employee, were obtained for two of 10 staff reviewed. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents residing in the facility at risk of abuse, neglect, and exploitation from staff. The facility census was 126 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriations, effective date 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Components section included A. Screening . 3. Criminal background checks will be conducted prior to permanent employment. Review of the facility employee files revealed the following: 1. The Director of Nursing (DON) was hired on 2/22/2023 with no background process completed. 2. The Dietary Manager (DM) was hired on 2/7/2023 with no background or fingerprint process completed. A review of the facility-provided Employee Roster Georgia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team, the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents (R) (R475) with an indwelling urinary catheter had a person-centered comprehensive care plan for the use of the indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice had the potential to place R475 at risk of not receiving treatment and/or care according to their needs. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Care Planning-Interdisciplinary Team revealed the Policy Interpretation and Implementation section included, 1. A comprehensive care plan for each resident is developed after completion of the resident assessment (MDS) [Minimum Data Set]. Review of R475's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five residents (R) (R475) with an indwelling urinary catheter had a qualifying medical diagnosis for the use of an indwelling urinary catheter. The deficient practice had the potential to place R475 at risk of avoidable urinary tract complications. Findings include: Review of R475's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis affecting one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body), major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and a personal history of urinary tract infections. Review of R475's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed section H (Bowel and Bladder) documented the resident had an indwelling catheter. Section I (Active Diagnoses) did not include any genitourinary diagnoses. Section M (Skin Condition) documented that there were no wounds. Review of R475's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. There were three errors with 29 opportunities for two of four residents (R) (R43 and R74) observed during medication administration. The medication error rate was 10.34 percent. These failures had the potential to place R43 and R74 at risk of medical complications and decreased therapeutic effects of medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Medication Administration revealed the Policy section included A licensed nurse, Med Tech (medication technician), or medication aide, per state regulations, will administer medications to patients. Accepted standards of practice will be followed. The Purpose section stated, To provide a safe, effective medication administration process. 1. Review of R43's Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 8/13/2024 for divalproex sodium oral capsule delayed release (DR) sprinkle 125 milligrams (mg), four…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policies titled Hand Hygiene and Infection Prevention and Control Policy, the facility failed to ensure infection control processes were followed during resident care for three residents (R). Specifically, during a fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) test for one of 36 R requiring a FSBS (R8), during wound care for one of 20 R receiving wound care (R6), and for one of eight R receiving tube feeding (R91). The deficient practices had the potential to place R8, R6, and R91 at risk of avoidable exposure to infections. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Hand Hygiene, effective date 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement included, . Handwashing is the single most important procedure for preventing nosocomial infections. The facility requires personnel to wash hands thoroughly to remove dirt, organic material, and transient microorganisms. Handwashing is mandated between resident contact in an effort to prevent the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-11 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge Including AMA [against medical advice], the facility failed to ensure the Ombudsman was notified for six of six residents (R) (R5, R1, R2, R7, R8, and R11) reviewed for discharge from the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Transfer and Discharge Including AMA, revealed the Policy was It is the policy of this facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not initiate transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility, except in limited circumstances. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included . 4. The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand. The notice will include all of the following at the time it is provided: . h. The name, address (mailing and email), and phone number of the representative of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policies titled, Glucometer Disinfection, and Infection Prevention and Control, the facility failed to ensure the infection control process was followed by two of three nurses observed using a glucometer (a device used to measure blood glucose) to check resident's blood sugar levels. The deficient practices had the potential to increase the potential for cross-contamination and spread of infection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Glucometer Disinfection, dated 11/2017, revealed the Policy stated, The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the disinfection of capillary-blood sampling devices to prevent transmission of blood borne diseases to residents and employees. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section included 1. The facility will ensure blood glucometers will be cleaned and disinfected after each use and according to manufacturer's instructions for multi-resident use. 3. Glucometers should be cleaned and disinfected after each use and according to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, review of the facility policy titled, Patient/Resident Trust Funds, and review of the facility-provided document titled, Resident Fund Accounts, the facility failed to provide resident trust fund account quarterly statements for three of 100 residents (R) with trust fund accounts managed by the facility (R4, R6, and R9). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who had a trust fund account with the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Patient/Resident Trust Funds, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Procedure section included .3. At the time of admission, the resident will sign an authorization indicating understanding of the policy and giving the healthcare center authorization to handle such funds. This authorization is to be maintained in the financial file. Review of the undated document located in the resident admission packet titled, Resident Fund Accounts revealed, The center shall furnish resident/patients with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Grievances Policy, Missing Items (Including Misappropriation of Property), and Resident Council Meetings, the facility failed to make a prompt effort to file a grievance for two of 25 sampled residents (R) (R7 and R9) who verbally reported grievances. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of not having their grievances resolved in a timely manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Grievances Policy, dated 2/1/2024, revealed the Policy Statement was It is the policy for healthcare centers to have and follow an established process whereby residents and/or other customers may have their grievances and complaints resolved in a prompt, reasonable and consistent manner. All employees will take an active part in efforts to resolve grievances voiced without discrimination or retaliation. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Missing Items (Including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-11-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 122 of 136 residents receiving an oral diet. Findings include: A review of the cleaning schedule submitted by the dietary manager indicated a Sunday-to-Sunday cleaning schedule with a focus on sweeping and mopping kitchen floors under the prep tables and behind the oven, stove, and steamers every day. During an interview and initial tour of the kitchen with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 10/31/23 at 8:56 am an observation of the floor behind the deep fryer was full of debris that was noted to be black and sticky. The area was unclean and continued to be unclean throughout the survey process. The DM confirmed the findings in the kitchen. During an Interview on 11/01/2023 at 12:08 pm with DM revealed the findings as being unclean and presenting an unsanitary condition. The DM expresses it is the responsibility of the kitchen staff to ensure that the main kitchen, floors, and appliances are clean and in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, record reviews, and the document Rules and Regulations for Criminal Background Checks the facility failed to consistently require new hires to go through a criminal background check before beginning employment. This deficient practice affected 5 out of 10 new employees. The census was 137. Findings include: Review of the document Rules and Regulations for Criminal Background Checks, no revised date noted, Licensed Healthcare Providers who are exempt from state fingerprint background check requirements as long as the employer checks with the applicable licensing board to verify that the license is in good standing, Nurses, Occupational Therapists, Physical Therapists, Social Workers. Unlicensed personnel are subject to state fingerprint background check requirements because they are not licensed Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), Recreational Therapists. During an interview with the Human Resources Director on 11/1/2023 at 9:00 am it was revealed five new employee files reviewed out of 10 did not have a criminal background check. 1. Administrator hired 5/1/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-11-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and the facility policy titled Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability the facility failed to maintain accurate records on controlled substances on four of six medication carts (Magnolia Hall, [NAME] Lane Hall, Pine Circle Hall, and Cedar Street Hall). Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability revealed the policy was to promote safe, high quality patient care, compliant with state and federal regulations regarding monitoring the use of controlled substances. The facility will have safeguards in place in order to prevent loss, diversion or accidental exposure. The Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines section line numbered 9 stated: Inventory Verification: b. For areas without automated dispensing systems, two licensed nurses account for all controlled substances and access keys at the end of each shift. Observation on 11/2/2023 at 10:30 am with the Director of Nursing (DON), of the controlled medication document titled Nurse Signature Sheet and located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene Cleaning and Disinfection pt Resident - Care Items and Equipment, and Tracheostomy Care, the facility failed to maintain proper infection control practices by not performing hand hygiene between residents during meal pass on one hall of six, one resident (R) (R122) during tracheostomy care, and not properly labeling and storing of resident- care items on two of six halls. The facility census was 139. Findings included: 1.A review of an undated facility policy titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revealed that all personnel shall follow the handwashing/ hand hygiene procedures to help prevent the spread of infections to other personnel, residents, and visitors. The policy also revealed that staff are to use an alcohol-based hand rub, or alternatively, soap and water before and after direct contact with residents. During observation of the lunch pass on Magnolia Lane Hall, on 10/31/2023 from 11:35 am until 11:50 am, it was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to maintain a clean and homelike environment as evidenced by the presence of dusty fans in resident rooms in two of six halls. This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for use of unsanitary and unsafe equipment and a potential for diminished quality of life.The facility census was 139. Findings included: On 10/31/2023 at 11:05 am, it was observed that a fan that was in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dusty. On 10/31/2023 at 11:15 am, it was observed that the fan in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dusty. On 10/31/2023 at 11:20 am, it was observed that the fan in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dusty. On 10/31/2023 at 11:23 am, it was observed that the fan in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dusty on the resident's overbed table and was blowing towards the resident's head. On 10/31/2023 at 11:17 am, it was observed that the fan in resident room [ROOM NUMBER] was dusty. On 10/31/2023 at 11:20 am, it was observed that the fan in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled Reporting Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, the facility failed to report an alleged violation of misappropriation of property, specifically the medication Morphine for one of 39 residents (R) (R286) sampled, to the State Agency (SA). Findings include: Review of the policy titled, Reporting Reasonable Suspicion of a Crime, copyright 2022, section, Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines it was revealed that annually the facility will notify all employees, managers, agents, and contractors of the facility of the obligation to report any suspicion of a crime committed against a resident of this facility to one of more law enforcement agencies and the state survey agency. Although it remains the responsibility of each covered individual to ensure that his/her individual reporting responsibility is fulfilled in addition to reporting to law enforcement and SA it is the policy of this facility that employees report suspicion to the administrator or their designee. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living the facility failed to ensure two of 137 residents (R) (R42 and R127) were given showers as scheduled. This failure had the potential to impact residents' quality of life and decrease functional status. Finding include: Review of the facility's policy titled the Activities of Daily Living Based on the comprehensive assessment of a patient and consistent with the patient's need and choices, the center must provide the necessary car and services to ensure that a patient's abilities in activities of daily living do not dimmish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical conditions demonstrates that such diminution was unavoidable. 1. Record review of the most recent Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R42 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15, indicating the resident had intact cognition. Further review revealed R42 had no behaviors,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy titled, Enteral feeding process, the facility failed to label and date nutritional enteral feedings and failed to follow physician orders to Label each component with date and initials every night shift for two of fourteen residents (R) (R120 and R132). This failure had the potential for tube feeding to exceed the expiration date and time while administering an incorrect formula. Findings include: Observation on 11/2/23 at 1:49 pm revealed that R120 was lying in bed with tube feeding on. The formula bag and the flush bag were not labeled and dated. Observation on 11/2/23 at 1:52 pm revealed that R132 was lying in bed with tube feeding on. The formula bag and the flush bag were not labeled and dated. Review of the facility's policy titled Enteral feeding process, revealed Policy Statement: Formula order: State feeding route, formula name, rate and if continuous or bolus feeding. If it is continuous add start and end times.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and a review of the facility policy Oxygen Safety, the facility failed to provide necessary respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice by not ensuring the oxygen equipment gauge was set on the prescribed flow rate for two of four residents (R) (R122 and R93) receiving oxygen therapy. This deficient practice has the potential to cause respiratory distress for the residents. The sample size was 39. Findings include: 1. Record review of the physician orders for R122 include Oxygen at 6 LPM (liters per minute) via tracheostomy continuous for acute respiratory failure. Record review of R122 diagnoses includes acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia. Record review of the care plan for R122 a history of respiratory failure. Creates risk for altered breathing patterns, infection, and complications. Observation on 11/01/2023 at 10:34 am in R122's room Oxygen was on by tracheostomy at 7.5 liters. Observation on 11/02/2023 at 11:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews and a review of the facility policy titled Storage of Medications, the facility failed to secure drugs and biologicals in a safe, secure manner for one of six medication cart and one of one treatment cart. This failure placed residents, staff and visitors at risk for having unauthorized access to resident's medications. The facility census was 139. Findings included: Review of the policy with the revision date of August 2021 titled Storage of Medications revealed that Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes.) containing drugs and biologicals shall be locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items shall not be left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. On 10/31/2023 at 11:31 am, it was observed that the treatment cart was unlocked with the key in the lock. The treatment cart was observed outside a resident door with the door closed. The treatment nurse opened the door of the room and returned to the cart. She revealed that I knew I…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115537. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.