Jonesboro Center for Nursing and Healing LLC

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 31.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 29% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 129 beds and averages 118.6 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.33 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.24 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.72 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.27 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0582 — widespread
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices, the facility failed to provide Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) as required for three of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 160, R76, and R103) reviewed for beneficiary notices out of a sample of 50 residents. This failure had the potential to lead to financial burdens for residents, as they may have to pay out-of-pocket for care that is typically covered by Medicare.Findings include:Review of the facility provided policy titled, Advance Beneficiary Notices with a revision date of 11/23 indicated Policy:. It is the policy of this facility to provide timely notices regarding Medicare eligibility and coverage. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines:. 1. The Business Office Manager is the contact person for information regarding Medicare eligibility, coverage, and applying for benefits. A notice alerting residents/ representatives of this contact person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure tuna salad sandwiches were served at the proper temperature. This deficient practice had the potential to cause food born illnesses affect 115 out of 119 residents. Findings included: During the second kitchen observation and interview on 02/11/26 from 11:58 AM to 12:42 PM, the following observations were made with the Dietary Manager (DM):A small steam table pan was observed on the counter at the left end of the steam table. The steam table pan contained eight tuna salad sandwiches, stacked one on top of one another, in stacks of two. At 12:09 PM the [NAME] stated the tuna salad sandwiches were the alternate menu item and were ready to be served to residents in the dining room. The DM took the temperature of the tuna salad sandwiches; the temperature was 55 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The DM and the Registered Dietician (RD) stated the tuna salad sandwiches should be 41 degrees F to be served. The [NAME] stated she put the tuna sandwiches in the freezer to cool. At 12:20 PM the DM was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Promoting/ Maintaining Resident Dignity, the facility failed to ensure staff dressed residents in daily clothing for one of one (Resident (R) 30) reviewed for dignity. This failure had the potential to cause embarrassment for the resident and failed to respect the resident's autonomy to maintain their personal identity.Findings include:Review of the facility provided a policy titled, Promoting/ Maintaining Resident Dignity, with a revision date of 03/25 indicated Policy: It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as care for each resident in a manner and in an environment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. Compliance Guidelines:1. All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
  Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, the facility failed to complete a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS) within the required timeframe when a resident experienced multiple areas of functional decline for one of five residents (Resident (R) 57) reviewed for resident assessments. This failure placed R57 at risk for further decline if care plan revisions and interventions addressing the resident's change in condition were delayed.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, dated October 2025, revealed, an SCSA within 14 days of identifying a qualifying status change that affects more than one area and requires Interdisciplinary Team review and revision of the care plan. Review of R57's admission Record, dated 02/12/26 located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab, revealed R144 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments within the federally required timeframe for two of five residents (Resident (R) 4 and R144) reviewed for Resident Assessments. This failure had the potential to affect the accuracy and timeliness of federally required resident assessments. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS3.0 Completion, dated October 2025, documented the MDS transmission requirements of All assessments shall be transmitted to the designated [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] CMS System (iQlES) within 14 days of completion. 1. Review of R144's admission Record, dated 02/10/26 located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R144 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including type 2 diabetes, end stage renal disease, and dementia. Review of R144's admission MDS, with an Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, the facility failed to ensure accurate assessments were completed for four of 50 sample residents (Resident (R) 33, R117, R67 and R96) by failing to capture services the residents were receiving. This failure has the potential to prevent residents from receiving a needed service.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS 3.0 Completion, dated October 2025, indicated the discharge MDS assessment requirements as follows: Discharge Assessment – completed using the discharge date as the ARD and must be completed within 14 days of the discharge date /ARD. 1.Review of R33's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated an admission date of 01/06/22 with diagnoses of chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure and dementia. Review of R33's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/07/25 indicated R33 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level II assessment was completed for one resident (Resident (R) 94) reviewed for PASARR, who has a diagnosis of bipolar disorder and requires specialized services. This failure had the potential of placing R94 at risk for inappropriate care and lack of specialized services. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASARR Program, with a revision date of 12/24 indicated Policy:.This facility coordinates assessments with the preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) program under Medicaid to ensure that individuals with a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or a related condition receives care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. A11 applicants to this facility will…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview and review of the policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, the facility failed to ensure good hygiene was maintained for three residents (Residents (R) 1, R7, and R156) out of nine reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) in the sample of 50 residents. This failure has the potential for the residents to develop skin infections, have poor hygiene and a general decline in health.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, implemented October 2025, revealed, .based on the resident's comprehensive assessment and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs (activities of daily living) do not deteriorate unless deterioration is unavoidable.Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living: Bathing.1.Review of R1's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated an admission date of 04/22/25 with diagnoses of chronic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure two residents (Resident (R) 33 and R12) of two residents reviewed for activities out of a sample of 50 residents received an ongoing activities program to support their choice of activities. This failure had the potential for the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being to worsen and potentially develop a general decline in health. Findings include:1.Review of R33's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated an admission date 01/06/22 with diagnoses of chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure and dementia.Review of R33's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/07/25 indicated R33 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. R33 had bilateral impairment of the upper extremities and on one side of her lower extremities. She was dependent on staff for all activities of daily…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident (R) 33) reviewed for skin concerns out of a total sample of 50 residents received the proper care and monitoring to prevent an axilla rash under the left arm from worsening. This failure had the potential for R33's skin to worsen, cause pain, and potentially develop a general decline in health. Findings include:Review of R33's Face Sheet, located in the electronic medical records (EMR) under the Profile tab indicated an admission date 01/06/22, with diagnoses of chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure and dementia.Review of R33's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), located in the EMR under the MDS tab with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/07/25 indicated R33 was unable to complete the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. R33 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). R33 did not have Applications of ointments/medications listed under the skin conditions in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$16,801 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
• $6,284 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
• $6,500 — penalty dated 2023-10-26
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-01-18 for 29 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA