Sgmc Health Villa

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 58.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.549 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.64 to 0.31 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 18% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2021-08-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to review and revise the Comprehensive Care Plan for four of 24 residents (R#210, #49, #2 and #28) whose care plans were reviewed. Failure to revise the Care Plan for each resident resulted in the nursing staff being unaware of the current status of each resident, which resulted in a fall with a major injury for R#210. Actual harm was identified to have occurred on 6/29/2021 when R#1 fell, while being transferred with a mechanical lift, and sustained an intertrochanteric fracture of the right hip that required surgery. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Villa Interdisciplinary Plan of Care dated 11/13/19 revealed documentation that stated: Procedure Section B 2 The interdisciplinary plan of care includes, but is not limited to, the following. a. Services and activities to be furnished to attain or maintain the individuals highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being as well as such services offered but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2021-08-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and resident and staff interviews the facility failed to use a two-person transfer for one of four residents (R#210) transferred with a Hoyer lift. Actual harm was identified to have occurred on 6/29/2021 when R#1 fell, while being transferred with a mechanical lift, and sustained an intertrochanteric fracture of the right hip that required surgery. The findings include: Review of the facility Job Aid titled, Mechanical Lift dated 11/1/2019 revealed Purpose: To provide direction on the proper and safe use of mechanical lifts at SGMC Lakeland villa. Mechanical lifts include but are not limited to Hoyer, car extractor, and stander. At least two nursing staff members are needed to transfer an individual when using any lift. Record review revealed that R#210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the Resident's medical record revealed diagnoses that included weakness, other specified hypothyroidism, essential (primary) hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2021-08-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to provide staff with the necessary education and skill set to perform resident transfers; the facility staff improperly transferred one of four residents (R#210). This resulted in actual harm that required surgery. The findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Villa Safe Lifting dated 11/13/2019 revealed, 2. Evaluation of nursing staff use of lifting equipment is accomplished through in-service post-test, return demonstration, as well as on-the-job performance reports. R#210 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the resident's medical record revealed diagnosis of weakness, other specified hypothyroidism, essential (primary) hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux disease without esophagitis, major depressive disorder, type 2 (two) diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, unspecified macular degeneration, shortness of breath, urinary tract…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of R2's EMR revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, age-related nuclear cataract, primary open-angle glaucoma, and hemiplegia and hemiparesis of the right side. Review of R2 's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented a BIMS score of 15 (indicating little to no cognitive impairment). Review of R2's clinical record revealed no assessment for self-administration of medications. Review of R2's Clinical Physician Orders revealed no orders for self-administration of medications. Observation on 6/2/2025 at 12:18 pm of R2 's room revealed a package of throat lozenges in a clear storage container on the floor, visible to anyone entering the room, one three-ounce container of Resinol medicated ointment, and one bottle of hydrogen peroxide on the resident's overbed table. During an interview, at the time of the observation, R2 reported using the throat lozenges occasionally. She further stated that a certified nursing assistant (CNA) applied the peroxide and cream…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-04 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within 14 days of completion to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Quality Improvement Evaluation System (QIES) Assessment Submission and Processing (ASAP) System for eight of 31 sampled residents (R) (R27, R38, R25, R44, R14, R12, R4, and R23). Findings include: Review of the RAI Manual revealed Section 5.2 Timeliness Criteria included, For all non-admission OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1987) and PPS (Prospective Payment System) assessments, the MDS Completion Date must be no later than 14 days after the Assessment Reference Date (ARD). 1. Review of R27's MDS assessment revealed that a Quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/2/2025 was submitted on 6/3/2025. 2. Review of R38's MDS assessment revealed that a Quarterly assessment with an ARD of 3/10/2025 was submitted on 6/2/2025. 3. Review of R25's MDS assessments revealed that an Annual…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. Review of R2 's EMR revealed diagnoses including, but not limited to, unspecified asthma and morbid (severe) obesity due to excess calories. Review of R2 's Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Section N (Medications) documented R2 received an anticoagulant, and Section O (Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs) documented that R2 received oxygen. Review of R2's Clinical Physician's Orders revealed an order dated 9/30/2022 for oxygen via a NC at two LPM as needed (PRN) and an order dated 9/29/2023 for Eliquis oral tablet 5 mg (a medication used to prevent and treat blood clots), one tablet by mouth two times a day. Review of R2's Care Plan Report revealed no care plan for oxygen use or anticoagulant medication use. Observations on 6/2/2025 at 12:18 pm and 6/3/2025 at 10:00 am revealed R2 receiving oxygen via a NC at two LPM. In an interview on 6/4/2025 at 10:45 am, the MDS Coordinator confirmed there were no care plan areas for oxygen or anticoagulant use on R2's care plan and confirmed the physician…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled Falls Assessments/ Falls Risk Policy, the facility failed to ensure post-fall assessments were conducted for one of 10 residents (R) (R39) with falls. This deficient practice had the potential to place R39 at risk of falls, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings: Review of the facility policy titled Falls Assessments/ Falls Risk Policy, dated 2/20/2024, revealed the Purpose section stated, The purpose of this Policy is to provide guidelines for identifying patients at risk for falling and implementing safeguards to minimize patient falls. The Procedure section included . C. Interventions . 2. Any resident who experiences a fall will receive an assessment weekly for a period of twelve weeks. If the resident experiences no additional falls, they will be placed into the appropriate Fall Risk category, and assessments will be performed as required. If the resident experiences an additional fall during this period, the twelve 12 weeks assessment period will reset and weekly…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record reviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Villa Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment of Individuals, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation and suspicion of abuse was reported to the State Survey Agency (SSA) within the required time frame for one of 14 sampled residents (R) (R A). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Villa Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment of Individuals dated 8/1/2022, under the Policy section revealed, 8. In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment of an individual, [facility name] ensures that the allegations are immediately reported to the [facility name] Administrator. If the event(s) that caused suspicion result in serious bodily injury, it must be reported to The Georgia Department of Community Health no later than (2) hours after forming the suspicion. If the event(s) causing suspicion did not result in serious bodily injury, it must be reported to The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Villa Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment of Individuals, the facility failed to implement thorough protective measures following an allegation of staff to resident abuse. Specifically, the facility failed to remove a staff member from the schedule and allowed the staff member to work in the area where the resident/victim resided during the investigation of abuse, for one of 14 sampled residents (R) (R A). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy Villa Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, Mistreatment of Individuals dated 8/1/2022, revealed the Procedure portion of the policy included a section on Protection and documented that the facility would take all necessary steps to protect individuals from harm during an investigation and steps may include, but are not limited to the following: suspension of the suspected abuser, reassignment of staff member to another section, reassignment of the individual to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop a care plan for five dependent residents (R) (#31, #40, #12, #48, #58) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs); and failed to implement the care plan related to providing contracture management/braces/range of motion (ROM) services for one resident (R#41) of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Villa Interdisciplinary Plan of Care revised 11/1/2019 revealed the facility develops and implements a comprehensive interdisciplinary plan of care for each individual with seven days after the completion of the individual's comprehensive assessment and that includes measurable objective and timeframes to meet an individual's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment . The interdisciplinary plan of care should be reviewed after the comprehensive and quarterly resident assessment. 1. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, record review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure six residents (R) (R#31, R#40, R#12, R#48, R#54, and R#58) received showers and personal hygiene needs of 30 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Villa Activities of Daily Living revised 11/1/2019 revealed the facility provides an individual who is unable to carry out ADLs with the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Activities of daily living include a) bathing c) grooming. 1. Review of Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R#31 with a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 indicting moderate cognitive impairment. The resident required two person extensive assistance with transfer, one person total dependance with bathing and personal hygiene. Review of the bathing schedule revealed R#31 is scheduled for Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday on the 3 p.m. - 11 p.m.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident interviews, staff interviews, family interviews, and review of facility document titled, SGMC Lakeland Villa Facility Assessment 2022, the facility failed to ensure that the facility had adequate nursing staff. The deficient practice affected the care provided to the 58 residents that resided in the facility. Findings include: Observation on 2/11/2023 at 9:30 a.m. revealed there were four Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) and three licensed nurses working in the facility at time of observation for the 7-3 p.m. shift, with a census of 58. Observation on 2/11/2023 at 3:10 p.m. revealed there were two CNAs and two licensed nurses working in the facility for the 3-11 p.m. shift, with a census of 58. Observation on 2/12/2023 at 8:40 a.m. revealed for 7- 3p.m. there were two licensed nurses, and four CNAs for the entire facility with a census of 58. Review of facility document titled, Adequate Staff to Meet needs dated 12/18/2022 revealed (Per Patient Day) PPD of 1.8, 12/24/2022 PPD…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility documents titled Daily Patient Room Cleaning Steps, Housekeeping Orientation Skills Validation Form, and Tray Presentation Standards the facility failed to maintain sanitary and clean conditions related to cross contamination when mopping resident rooms and bathrooms. In addition, the facility failed to ensure food items on meal trays were covered when delivered. This deficient practice impacted two of four hallways. Findings include: Review of document titled Daily Patient Room Cleaning Steps (undated) revealed 12 steps listed under instructions which included the following: 8. Dust Mop 9. Damp Mop Restroom 10. Damp Mop Patient Area using New Mop Head 1.Review of the Housekeeping Orientation Skills Validation Form dated 10/12/2022 for Housekeeper (HSK) JJ revealed a verbalization of the process for duties but the form did not indicate that there was observation of duties. Observation on 2/11/2023 at 10:56 a.m. Housekeeper (HSK) JJ was observed mopping…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 5 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in GA