No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Coastal Manor

128 Coastal Manor Drive SE, Ludowici, GA 31316 · Non profit - Corporation · 108 certified beds · (912) 545-3392 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (912) 545-3392 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Feb 20251 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
15 N McDonald St · (912) 545-9511 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5420 N Portland Ave · (405) 947-6828 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
191 E Cypress St · (912) 545-9889 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
25 County Shop Rd SE

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 1 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased34.4%15.3%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.9%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection9.6%2.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms23.8%11.3%6.5%worse
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.9%3.2%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.3%15.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication25.8%20.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.5%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.4%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.9%19.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%78.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission29.1%25.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit23.8%11.6%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.582.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days3.291.901.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

34.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

34.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
49.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.23U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 49.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF34.6%CMS range 23.2–47.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.3%CMS range 7.9–17.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge49.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 2.8–11.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.69
RN hours/ resident / day
1.12
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.19
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.46
RN hoursweekends
37.2%
Total nursing turnover
30.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 108 beds and averages 86.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.19 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.38 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.45 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.78 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-16)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Actual harm · G2023-03-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a proper transfer was provided for one of six residents (Resident #41) reviewed for accidents. Actual harm was identified on 2/21/2023 when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)#7 transferred R#41 without assistance, and this resulted in Resident #41 sustaining a left tibia fracture. Findings included: A review of a Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #41 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness and hemiplegia affecting the nondominant side following cerebral infarction. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #41 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making based on staff assessment; the resident was totally dependent on staff for transfers and required two persons physical assistance; the resident had functional limitations in range of motion in the upper and lower extremities on one side; and the resident used a wheelchair for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food stored in the walk-in freezer was properly stored off the floor; food was properly labeled and dated; equipment was properly cleaned; and dented cans were properly discarded in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all 82 residents of the facility who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, dated 01/25, revealed All food, non-food items and supplies used in food preparation shall be stored in such a manner as to prevent contamination to maintain the safety and wholesomeness of the food for human consumption . Cover, label and date unused portions and open packages .Product is protected from the possibility of dust spinning upward during sweeping or mopping through the use of a solid barrier such as a sheet of plastic placed under products on the bottom shelf of open wire shelving .Dry Storage: Maintain designated area for items that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-16 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a written notification of transfer to the hospital was given or sent to the resident and the resident representative (RR) for three residents (Resident (R)17, R76, and R82) of 27 sampled residents reviewed. This failed practice had the potential to affect the resident and the RR by not having the information of where and why a resident was transferred and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired. Findings include: Review of the facility's undated policy titled Transfer/Discharges stated purpose of the policy is to inform residents, family members, or legal representatives verbally and in writing (in a language and manner they understand) of reasons for a transfer or discharges. 1.Review of R17's Census tab located in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R17 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]; discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and returned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff reported allegation of abuse immediately to the Administrator/designee. The facility further failed to ensure the administrative staff reported allegations of abuse to the state survey agency. This deficient practice was observed in 5 of 7 allegations of abuse reviewed. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, effective 02/27/2024, revealed E. Reporting Procedures - Once a complaint or situation is identified involving alleged mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation of resident property the incident shall be immediately reported to the Nursing Home Administrator. 1. The Director of Nursing (or his/her designee) or Chief Long Term Care Officer a.k.a. [also known as] Nursing Home Administrator (or his/her designee) shall immediately notify the Complaint Investigation Intake and Referral Unit, the legal representative and/or interested family member, and the attending physician of the incident and the pending…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to investigate 5 of 7 allegations of abuse perpetrated by a resident, Resident #2. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Abuse Prohibition, effective 02/27/2024, revealed F. Investigation - Once a complaint or situation is identified involving alleged mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown sources and misappropriation or resident property, the following investigation and reporting procedures shall be followed: 1. The description of the alleged complaint is written on the investigation form. Any physical evidence and description of emotional state shall be documented. 2. Information gathering - The following information shall be gathered: a. Name of suspect b. Name of the resident c. Specific information about what happened d. Specific information about when it happened - include date and time of occurrence e. Specific information about where it happened f. Specific information about why it happened or any extenuating circumstances that you might have information about.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be from physical abuse perpetrated by a resident, Resident #2. On 05/28/2024, Resident #2 hit Resident #11 in the head. On 10/09/2024, Resident #2 scratched Resident #4 under their right eye. On 10/16/2024, Resident #2 grabbed Resident #1 by their neck. These deficient practices affected 3 (Residents #1, #4, and #11) of 11 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition, effective 02/27/2024, revealed, It shall be the policy of [facility name] to actively preserve each resident's right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse or misappropriation of resident property. The policy specified, Abuse - the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm or pain or mental anguish. Per the policy, Physical Abuse - includes hitting, slapping, pinching and kicking. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #2 on 05/02/2024. According to the admission Record,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a preadmission screening and resident review (PASARR) screening was completed on or before admission or after the resident remained in the facility past 30 days for 1 (Resident #2) of 11 sampled residents. Findings included: A facility policy titled, Admissions (LTC), with an original date of 10/29/2001 and an effective date of 04/23/2024, indicated I. Introduction: The Admissions policy applies to residents admitted to the department of Long Term Care without regard to race, color, creed, national origin, age, sex, religion, handicap, ancestry, marital or veteran status, and/or payment source. The policy specified, H. Documentation for Medical Record: included f. PASARR Level I Evaluation. An admission Record indicated the facility admitted Resident #2 on 05/02/2024. According to the admission Record, the resident had a medical history that included diagnoses of autistic disorder, moderate intellectual disabilities,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-10 · tag F0700 — widespread
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. A review of a Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #62 on 05/30/2019 with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction with hemiplegia affecting the nondominant side. The annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #62 had severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making based on staff assessment. According to the MDS, the resident required extensive assistance of one person for bed mobility and maximum assistance from staff for transfers. The MDS indicated bed rails were not used as a physical restraint. Review of Resident #62's Care Plan, with a revision date of 11/03/2022, revealed there was no documentation related to use of bed rails. Review of Resident #62's Physician's Orders, revealed there was no order for side rails or bed rails. During observations made on 03/06/2023 at 11:26 AM and 03/07/2023 at 2:24 PM, Resident #62 was lying in bed with half bed rails in the raised position on both sides of the bed. On 03/08/2023 at 9:00 AM the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy titled, Food Handling Guidelines, Cleaning of Food and Nonfood Contact Surfaces, Food Handing Guidelines, Hand Hygiene, and Sanitation Inspection and Checklist, it was determined that the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety. Specifically, the facility failed to thaw chicken properly, use the three compartment sink appropriately while washing a food processor, transfer food to the tray line appropriately, ensure staff put on a hairnet prior to entering the kitchen, ensure staff washed their hands between glove changes, and ensure food was stored properly. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 83 of 84 residents who received meals from the facility kitchen. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Handling Guidelines, revised February 2023, revealed procedures for thawing frozen meat/poultry/seafood and indicated the meat should be thawed Under running water: Submerged under potable running water at a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-10 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, facility document review, and facility policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an effective plan of action to address the use of bed rails in the facility. In October 2022, the facility identified assessments were not being completed for residents with bedrails/side rails to determine safety and appropriateness; however, the facility failed to develop a plan of action to address the lack of assessment. This deficient practice affected all 84 residents who currently reside in the facility. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI), effective 02/25/2020, specified, Purpose of policy: A. To provide a proactive approach to continually improve resident care. B. To ensure a safe and secure environment for residents. The policy further indicated, The QAPI Program will provide for the safety and high quality with all clinical interventions while emphasizing autonomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, with an effective date of 08/25/2020, specified, Appropriate Infection Prevention procedures will be followed during the administration of medications. A review of Resident #33's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent on staff for most activities of daily living and had a feeding tube. The MDS further indicated the resident had active diagnoses that included dementia and malnutrition. During medication administration observation on 03/08/2023 beginning at 8:52 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #13 administered medications to Resident #33 through the resident's percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube. LPN #13 used a 60 cubic centimeter (cc) syringe during the medication administration observation. At 9:00 AM, LPN #13 removed the plunger from the syringe and placed the plunger directly on the bed linen on the resident's bed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-10 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility document review, it was determined the facility failed to conduct regular inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails to ensure compatibility and to identify areas of possible entrapment for 53 of 59 occupied beds equipped with bed rails. Findings included: A tour conducted on 03/06/2023 of four of six hallways revealed 53 of 59 occupied beds were observed with some type of bed rail, ranging from quarter rails to half rails. At the end of the day on 03/06/2023, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to provide bed rail assessments for six residents (Residents #43, #61, #55, #62, #17, and #41) who had bed rails in use on their beds. On 03/08/2023 at 9:00 AM, the DON provided Bed Rail/Assist Bar Evaluation forms for the six residents. The completed forms did not include inspection of bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails and no other evidence was provided indicating regular inspections were conducted. On 03/07/2023 at 4:37 PM, the DON stated the interdisciplinary team assessed the need for bed rails, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy titled Care Plans, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a care plan to describe the need for, and use of, bed rails for four (Residents #17, #43, #61, and #62) of six residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plans, with an effective date of 10/27/2020, revealed, The Comprehensive Care Plan will provide direction to: 1. Incorporate identified problem areas: 2. Incorporate risk factors associated with identified problems; 3. Build on the resident's strengths; 4. Reflect treatment goals and objectives in measurable outcomes; 5. Identify the professional services that will be responsible for each element of care. The policy also revealed, The care plan will be used in developing the resident's daily care routines. The policy did not specifically address or mention the use of bed rails. 1. A review of a Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and review of facility policy titled Administering Medications,, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were two medication errors out of 26 opportunities, which resulted in a 7.69% medication error rate. This deficient practice affected 2 (Resident #25 and Resident #50) of 6 residents observed for medication administration. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated 08/25/2020, specified, Medications will be administered in a timely manner and in accordance with the attending physician's written/verbal orders. 1. A review of a Face Sheet indicated the facility admitted Resident #25 with diagnoses that included dementia, peripheral vascular disease, and cerebrovascular disease. A review of Resident #25's Physician Orders, for the month of March 2023, revealed an order, dated 03/23/2022, for acetaminophen 325 milligrams (mg), one tablet by mouth once a day for pain. During observation of medication administration on 03/08/2023 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BADEA, CALINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/23/2022
MCKETTRICK, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/09/2023
ROZIER, DEREKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115665. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next