A.g. Rhodes Home, INC - Cobb
900 Wylie Road, Marietta, GA 30067 · Non profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (770) 427-8727 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (33% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0609) — most recent May 2022
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (15) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.6% | 15.3% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.9% | 5.6% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.9% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 2.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 11.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.0% | 15.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 13.4% | 20.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 5.6% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.8% | 15.8% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 14.6% | 19.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.7% | 2.6% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.5% | 78.4% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 29.9% | 25.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 19.3% | 11.6% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.11 | 2.15 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.11 | 1.90 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 278 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 61.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 168 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.1%CMS range 41.4–54.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.4%CMS range 7.9–13.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 61.3% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 51.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.5%CMS range 4.8–10.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.04 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 120.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.39 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.80 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 33% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
15 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, document review, and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective infection control program to prevent the spread of COVID-19. The facility failed to implement measures to prevent the potential spread of COVID-19 throughout the facility. As of 5/18/22, the facility had four residents (R) (R#63, R#83, R#109, and R#322) and three staff members (staff EE, XXX and YYY) who tested positive for COVID-19. On 5/20/2022, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Director of Clinical Services (DCS) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 5/20/2022 at 5:33 p.m. The noncompliance related to the immediate jeopardy was identified to have existed on 5/11/2022. The IJ is outlined as follows: The IJ began on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-05-25 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — isolatedReport COVID19 data to residents and families.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents, resident representatives, and/or family members were notified by 5:00 p.m. the following day, of confirmed COVID-19 infections in the facility. On 5/9/22 the facility was notified by the family that resident (R) (R#83) had an exposure to COVID-19, and subsequently R#83 tested positive on 5/11/22; however, the facility did not notify residents, resident representatives, and/or family members of the new positive case until 5/21/22, 10 days after R#83 tested positive. The facility's failure had the potential to affect all residents, residents' representatives, and residents' families of the facility. The facility census was 104. On 5/20/2022, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-05-25 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to conduct routine and outbreak testing for COVID-19 for all staff and residents in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements, which potentially caused delays in identifying, treating, and isolating COVID-19 positive residents and staff to prevent them from infecting other residents and staff. This failure resulted in four residents, (R) (R#29, R#63, R#83, and R#109) and three staff (staff EE, XXX, and YYY) who tested positive for COVID-19. On 5/20/2022, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had caused or had the likelihood to cause, serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), and Director of Clinical Services (DCS) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 5/20/2022 at 5:33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-05-25 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, review of facility video footage, and policy review, it was determined the facility failed to protect one of four residents (R) R#23 from sexual abuse. Observation of facility video footage revealed on 1/1/22, R#270 (a cognitively intact resident) stood in front of R#23 for approximately 11 minutes while R#23, who was severely cognitively impaired, was seated in a chair. Observation of the video revealed during the approximate 11 minutes, R#270 touched/rubbed R#23's breast area on four separate occasions. On two of the four occasions, R#270 touched/rubbed R23's breasts while R#270 was standing in front of the resident with his/her genitals exposed. R#270 was also observed touching/rubbing his/her genitals in front of R#23. In addition, the facility failed to protect one of four residents, R#58, from potential sexual abuse. According to the facility, on 1/2/22, staff witnessed R#270 with his genitals exposed on/beside R#58's bed. This had the potential to cause psychocial harm…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2022-05-25 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, review of facility video footage, and facility policy review, it was determined the facility failed to report an incident of abuse for one of four residents (R) (R#58) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, R#270 exposed his genitals to R#58 on 1/2/22, and the facility failed to report the alleged incident to the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH). Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse Policy titled, Abuse Prohibition Policy and Procedures, revised 1/3/2022, revealed 7. Reporting/Response to the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH), Health Facility Regulation Division (HFRD). B. Upon receiving an allegation of abuse, the Reporting Personnel shall complete and submit a Facility Report to the Georgia Department of Community Health (DCH), Health Facility Regulation Division (HFRD) Long Term Care Section. C. If the event that an allegation of abuse is made, the Reporting Personnel shall submit a completed Facility Report to HFRD immediately, but not later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to update resident (R) care plans when significant events occurred for one of 27 sampled residents (R) (R84). Specifically, the facility failed to update/revise the care plan after instances of communication did not work for R84.Findings include:Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident (R)84 was admitted to the facility with pertinent diagnoses including but not limited to deaf nonspeaking, not elsewhere classified, contracture, left hand, stroke.Review of R84's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 06, which indicates R84 had severe cognitive impairment. Section GG, functional status, revealed R84 required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs) with one or more-person assistance. Impairment on one side of upper/lower extremities, benefits from the use of a wheelchair. Self Care: setup/clean up assistance with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Routine Cleaning and Disinfection and Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy, the facility failed to ensure that there was a clean and comfortable environment to prevent transmission of infection as evidenced by unbagged and unlabeled urinals in four of 19 resident bathrooms on the third floor of the Legacy building. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk for infection. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Routine Cleaning and Disinfection revised date of February 2025, revealed under Policy: To ensure the provision of routine cleaning and disinfection in order to provide a safe, sanitary environment and to prevent the development and transmission of infections to the extent possible. Review of the facility policy titled Infection Prevention and Control Program Policy revised date of July 10, 2023 revealed under Policy: This community has established and maintains an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled, Incident and Accidents and Abuse Prohibition Policy, the facility failed to ensure allegations of potential abuse were thoroughly investigated for one of three residents (R) (R6) who had an allegation of abuse.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Incident and Accidents last revised 8/28/2023, documented under Compliance Guidelines: .4. Incidents that rise to the level of abuse, misappropriation, or neglect, will be managed and reported according to the community's abuse and prevention policy.Review of the facility policy titled Abuse Prohibition Policy last revised 5/22/2023 revealed under Policy Explanation and Compliance Guidelines: 1. The facility will develop and implement written policies and procedures that: .b. Establish policies and procedures to investigate any such allegations.V. Investigation of Alleged Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation.4. Identify and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses and others who might have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Food and Supply Storage, the facility failed to discard frozen/refrigerated food items by expiration date, failed to label and date items in two of three reach in refrigerator units, and failed to maintain proper sanitary conditions by ensuring kitchen staff wore hairnets and beard guards while preparing food for residents. The deficient practice had the potential to affect 99 residents who received an oral diet from the kitchen. The facility census was 105 residents. Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled Food and Supply Storage date revised January 2024 under Procedures revealed: Cover, label, and date unused portions and open packages. Complete all sections on a 'company name' orange label or use 'company names' labeling system. Products are good through the close of business on the date noted on the label. Date and rotate items; first in, first out (FIFO). Discard food past the use-by or expiration date. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to keep potentially hazardous materials in a secured area. Specifically, the janitorial room on one of three floors (third floor) was unlocked and taped open, and treatment solution was left in the room on the nightstand of one resident (R) (R309) in room [ROOM NUMBER] of 24 rooms on the third floor where 23 residents with severe cognitive impairment resided. The deficient practice had the potential for residents residing on the third floor to come in contact with hazardous chemicals and waste. The facility census was 105 residents. Findings include: Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R309 revealed diagnoses including but not limited to unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbances, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, heart failure, unspecified, personal history of transient ischemic attack (TIA), and cerebral infarction without residual deficits, altered mental status,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly keep a complete record of the controlled drug shift audit, as evidenced by missing signatures on audit sheets for eight of twelve medication carts. This had the potential to cause residents to go without prescribed medications. The facility census was 105. Findings included: On 7/24/2024 starting at 8:32 am, a medication administration observation was conducted. The observation included a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) or a Certified Medication Aide (CMA) on each of the five floors. On 7/24/2024 at 9:40 am, on the Starvine medication cart, it was observed that there was one shift nurse's signature missing on the controlled drug shift audit sheet for 7/21/2024, on the 11:00 pm to 7:00 am shift. On 7/24/2024 at 9:45 am, on the Trilluim medication cart, it was observed that there were 15 signatures missing from the Controlled Drug Shift Audit sheet, between the dates of 7/1/2024 through 7/14/2024. On 7/24/2024, 2024 at 9:55 am, on the Dogwood medication cart, it was observed that there were 11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to properly care for the oxygen concentrator (machine that produces oxygen from room air) of one of eight residents (R) (R77) that use oxygen. Specifically, oxygen concengtrator filters were not cleaned timely. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Concentrator with a revision date of 6/23/2023 revealed that the Purpose of the policy is to establish responsibilities for the care and use of oxygen concentrators. The definition of an oxygen concentrator as defined by the policy, is a medical device that extracts oxygen from room air by filtering out or separating the nitrogen from the oxygen, by passing through a filter. Review of the compliance guidelines, . 5. Care of the concentrator: a. Clean filters as needed or directed by the supplier. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) for R77 revealed that she was admitted to the facility with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment accurately reflected the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis for one resident (R) R#20 of 56 residents whose MDS was reviewed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure R#20 used a splint or brace before indicating the resident utilized one on the MDS. Findings include: Review of the clinical record revealed R#20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. The resident's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was coded as 15, which indicates no cognitive impairment. Section G revealed resident required extensive assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use and personal hygiene, total dependence with transfers and bathing. Section 0 revealed resident received at least 15 minutes of splint or brace assistance through a restorative nursing program for two out of seven days during the assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with physician orders for one resident (R) (R#321) of one sampled resident reviewed for treatment of swelling and thrombosis (blood clot) to the legs. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff applied compression stockings (TED hose) and elevate the lower extremities to reduce swelling. Findings include: Review of the undated policy titled, Policy for Edema/TED Hose, revealed edema (swelling) is a result of excess fluids collecting in the tissues, often caused by an underlying disease process that interfered with circulation (decreased blood perfusion) to the legs and feet. Edema is treated by medications or nonpharmacological approaches, such as elevation of extremities, TED (thromboembolic disease) hose, etc. [et cetera]. TED hose (or anti-embolic stockings) exert pressure on the veins to promote venous blood return to the heart. Procedure 1. The patient with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure fall prevention interventions were added to the care plan and consistently implemented for one resident (R) (R#95) of three residents reviewed for accidents/hazards. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention Policy and Procedure dated 4/1/21, revealed the policy is 1. The facility will identify each resident who is at risk for falls and will plan care and implement interventions to assist in fall prevention. The facility will attempt to prevent falls by providing an environment that is free from potential hazards. 2. Nursing will complete the fall risk assessment. 3. A resident's fall prevention program will be implemented that educates staff in creative, functional strategies while recognizing residents and their need to maintain the highest practical level of function. Procedure: 1. Nursing assesses all residents for fall risk through the fall risk assessment upon admission,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LENNING, JUSTIN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2014 |
| LUTHER, TAMMY | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2020 |
| MINOR, ARIANA | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/07/2023 |
| CATEAU, DEKE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2018 |
| HELTON, MARY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/16/2021 |
| PHANGESTU, CHRISTINA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/06/2023 |
| WILSON, KEITH | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2019 |
| AEGIS THERAPIES, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2025 |
| AMERIS BANK | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| UNIDINE CORPORATION | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| CHARLES, ROSELYN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/01/2024 |
| FAGUNDES, TRAVETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/18/2020 |
| HARVEY, JOVONNE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2024 |
| POWELL, TIMOTHY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 03/29/2023 |
| ROLON, ANGEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/29/2004 |
| THOMAS, JONELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/18/2010 |
| WILLIAMS, SONYA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 01/05/2015 |
| WRIGHT, DIANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 05/08/2024 |
| CARE SOLUTIONS | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 09/15/2022 |
| AG RHODES HEALTH AND REHAB MGT INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2012 |
| EP WEALTH ADVISORS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2003 |
| HARMON PHYSICAL PLANT CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 09/13/2021 |
| MAULDIN & JENKINS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2011 |
| PRUITTHEALTH INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/01/2007 |
| WELLSTAR MEDICAL GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 06/05/2017 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 40 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $900K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in GA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115521. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.