No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Colquitt Regional Senior Care & Rehabilitation

101 Cobblestone Trace SE, Moultrie, GA 31768 · Government - Hospital district · 59 certified beds · (229) 985-3637 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (229) 985-3637 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Jan 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
16 Hospital Park · (229) 985-2326 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2707 S Main St · (229) 502-9900 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Walmart1.3 mi
419 Cheyenne Way · (229) 890-7416 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
830 26th Ave SE · (229) 985-3237

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.3%15.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%5.6%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.9%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.7%2.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.1%11.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%3.2%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.2%15.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%20.5%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers8.0%5.6%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control7.7%15.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.7%19.9%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%2.6%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.8%78.4%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.0%25.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%11.6%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.402.151.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.461.901.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 146 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

61.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 96 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 56% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF61.1%CMS range 53.5–68.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.5–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge35.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.7–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.771.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.61
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.05
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.39
RN hoursweekends
28.8%
Total nursing turnover
14.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 59 beds and averages 57.0 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.05 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-08)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

13 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed of the benefits, risks, and alternatives of treatment prior to initiating or increasing psychotropic medication for two of five residents (R) (R2 and R9) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice had the potential for residents to receive medications without knowing the benefits, risks and treatment options. Findings include:1. Review of R2's admission Record located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to major depressive disorder and insomnia. Review of R2's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/17/2025, revealed R2 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated little to no cognitive impairment. The MDS Section N: Medications revealed R2 received antidepressant and hypnotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy, the facility failed to ensure a Georgia Criminal History Check System (GCHEXS) fingerprint background check was completed for the Food Service Supervisor (FSS). The deficient practice could result in a staff with an unknown criminal background having access to residents. Findings include:Review of employee records for the Food Service Supervisor (FSS) revealed he was hired on 09/07/2022. The required GCHEXS fingerprint background check clearance letter was not located in the file. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 11:04 AM, the Assistant Administrator stated FSS did not have a GCHEXS background check completed upon hire.During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 11:59 AM, the Administrator stated Human Recourses did not complete fingerprint background checks for staff that did not have direct care with residents.During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 12:14 PM, the Human Resources Assistant (HRA) stated environmental services and food services staff would not have direct contact with residents and did not have fingerprint background…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were followed for one resident (R) (R50) of 17 sampled residents. Specifically, R50 received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) with a physician's order to avoid NSAID use. This deficient practice placed R50 at risk of adverse clinical outcomes. Findings include:Review of R50's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile'' tab revealed an admission date of 08/05/2024. Further review revealed that R50's diagnoses included, but were not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease.Review of R50's EMR under the ''Orders'' tab revealed a physician order dated 03/19/2025 that documented, Avoid all NSAIDs at all times.'' R50 had a subsequent physician order dated 05/29/2025 for Ibuprofen (an NSAID) 800 milligram (mg) tablet, give one tablet by mouth every six hours as needed (PRN) for pain.Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 2025, located in the EMR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure staff followed standard infection control practices during wound care and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for two of seventeen residents (R) (R9 and R12) reviewed for infection control practices. These deficient practices have the potential to place residents and staff at risk for cross-contamination and the spread of infections.Findings include:1. Review of R12's admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile'' tab, revealed R12 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, colostomy status, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and overactive bladder.Review of R12's Physician Orders dated 02/05/2024, documented an order for Colostomy care.''Review of R12's Care Plan revised 8/5/2025 revealed R12 was placed on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).Observation on 01/07/2026 at 9:15 AM revealed a yellow magnet posted on R12's door frame,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, review of facility documentation, and review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship, the facility failed to develop an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) to monitor antibiotic use. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that residents were not prescribed an antibiotic, or were not administered an antibiotic(s), without diagnostic testing that identified an organism and documented symptomology to support the continued use of an antibiotic. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Facility census was 54 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship dated 9/2022 indicated, Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program/QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) Committee .Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected, documented, and any trends will be reported to the QAPI committee. Review of the facility's ASP, since the last recertification survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge documentation, the facility failed to ensure a written transfer/discharge notice with required content was provided prior to being transferred for three residents (R), R32, R1, R8, and the resident representatives (RR). In addition, the facility failed to provide the State LTC (Long Term Care) Ombudsman office with notification of residents who transferred or discharged . The deficient practice had the potential for residents to be inappropriately transferred or discharged by not being informed of their rights and appeal options. The sample size was 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge documentation dated 10/2022 revealed, .4 .when a resident is transferred .from the facility, the following information will be documented in the medical record .b. That an appropriate notice was provided to the resident and /or legal representative . 1. Review of R32's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, the facility failed to implement a care plan for monitoring the use of psychotropic medications for two of two residents (R) R154 and R31 reviewed for psychotropic medications. This failure could result in unwarranted use of psychotropic medications and unmanaged medication side effects. The sample size was 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Antipsychotic Medication Use, dated 8/2022, revealed, .The attending physician and other staff will gather and document information to clarify a resident's behavior, mood, function, medical condition, specific symptoms, and risks to the resident and others .based on assessing the resident's symptoms and overall situation, the physician will determine whether to continue, adjust, or stop existing antipsychotic medication . 1. Review of R154's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic [NAME] record (EMR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to document discharge needs and assessment of a resident being discharged home for one of three residents (R) R44 out of 22 sampled residents. The result of this failure was incomplete documentation and communication among staff in the discharge process of R44. Findings include: Review of R44's undated Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of fracture of unspecified part of the right femur with subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. Review of R44's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), revealed R44 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. This represented R44 was cognitively intact. Review of R44's Progress Notes revealed no documentation of the discharge needs or assessment of R44 when discharged home. There was also no date in the progress notes as to the date R44 was discharged home.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, review of the dialysis contract, and review of the facility's policy titled, End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of the Resident with, the facility failed to completely document care of a dialysis resident and failed to collaborate with the dialysis center for one of one resident (R) R9 out of 22 sampled residents. This failure resulted in a lack of documentation in the medical record and communication of all staff involved in the care of R9. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy End-Stage Renal Disease, Care of the Resident with dated 9/2010 revealed, Residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care . Review of the dialysis contract dated 5/15/2024 stated, . Provider shall document all Dialysis Services, Related Services, (as defined below) and all other information that should be documented in accordance with standard Clinical documentation practices. At a minimum such documentation must include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0732 — isolated
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, the facility failed to ensure that the daily nurse staffing was posted to accurately reflect the actual staff hours to care for the 54 residents. This failure had the potential to inaccurately inform any resident, family member, or visitor of the available nursing staff caring for residents. The sample size was 22 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers dated 10/2022 indicated, Our facility will post on a daily basis for each shift, the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents .1. Within two hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses .and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNAs) directly responsible for resident care will be posted in a prominent location .3. Shift staff information shall be recorded .g. The actual time worked during that shift for each category and type of nursing staff . Observation on 8/11/2024 at 7:54…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility policy titled, Change in a Resident's Condition or Status the facility failed to notify the responsible party and the physician of a change in condition for two residents (R) R#4 and R#9) of 16 residents reviewed. Findings include: 1.Review of the facility policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status revised 2/2021, revealed: Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. The nurse will notify the resident's attending physician or physician on call when there has been a: d. Significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. 4. Unless otherwise instructed by the resident, a nurse will notify the resident's representative when: b. There is a significant change in the resident's physical/emotional/mental condition. Review of R#4's diagnoses revealed but not limited to monoplegia of upper limb following cerebral infarction affecting the left side, cyst on pancreas, anxiety, cognitive impairment, major depression…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to document the duration of therapy for one resident (R) R#57) that had an order for PRN [as needed] antianxiety medication beyond 14 days of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of medical record for R#57 revealed an admission date of 7/27/22 with diagnoses that included but not limited to generalized anxiety, dementia with behavioral disturbances, and major depressive disorder. Review of R#57's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Section C-Cognition: brief interview of mental status (BIMS) score of 12 indicating minimum cognitive deficit; Section D-Mood: mood score of five (5), Section E-Behavior: no behaviors; and Section N-Medications: antianxiety and antidepressant use. Review of R#57's Physician's orders revealed (partial list): lorazepam tablet one (1) milligram (MG) give 1 tablet by mouth (PO) every 12 hours PRN for anxiety with an order start date of 7/27/22. An interview held on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and review of policy titled, Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to implement consistent infection control practices during medication administration for four residents (R) R#58, R#10, R#24, and R#26). This omission had the potential to affect any resident receiving medications at the facility. The census was 53. Findings Include: Review of policy titled Hand Hygiene (dated [DATE]) revealed Policy interpretation and Implementation 1. All personnel shall follow our established handwashing procedures to prevent the spread of infection and disease to other personnel, patients, and visitors. 2. Associates must perform appropriate handwashing procedures under the following conditions: a. When coming on duty; d. Before preparing or handling medications; g. After contact with blood, body fluids, excretions, secretions, mucous membranes or non-intact skin; and j. After removing gloves. Observation during medication administration with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) HH on 8/17/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BHAVNANI, JAYSHREEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2021
MATNEY, JIMMYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 03/01/2022
SWARTZENTRUBER, GARYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/01/2022
SLOAN, JOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/05/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in GA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Georgia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Georgia
$8,821/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$9,429/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,300/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 115667. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next