Bryan County Hlth & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 57 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 27.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 44 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 88.2 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.06 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.33 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.85 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 7% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Preparation of Pureed Foods for Residents with Dysphagia, the facility failed to ensure that pureed foods were prepared according to standardized recipes and professional food service standards for residents (R) requiring texture modified diets. This deficient practice had the potential to affect nine residents receiving pureed diets.Findings Include:Review of the undated policy titled Preparation of Pureed' foods for the Residents with Dysphagia, revealed under the Moist and Consistency section, to add appropriate liquids to achieve proper consistency: broth, milk, gravy or approved thickened liquids. It was revealed under the Nutritional Adequacy section to ensure meals meet residents' nutritional needs. Fortify foods when needed (e.g., adding protein powder, butter, or supplements).Observation and interview on 03/31/2026 at 10:49 AM revealed that Dietary Aide (DA) HH did not use a recipe while pureeing carrots and chicken dumplings. Carrots and water were used to prepare the pureed carrots. A can…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Food Storage, the facility failed to ensure that all foods were properly labeled, dated, and discarded, and failed to ensure the cleanliness of kitchen equipment used in the preparation of food for residents. Failure to follow this policy resulted in improper food storage and unsanitary food preparation practices. This deficient practice had the potential to place 83 residents (R) who received an oral diet at risk of contracting a foodborne illness.Findings include:A review of the facility's undated policy titled Food Storage, documented under Food Service Employees, Stock is rotated so that older items are used first. Products are dated to assure First In- First Out procedures are followed. Foods are inspected regularly for damage due to spoilage. Dented, bulging, leaking cans will be discarded, or returned to vendors for appropriate credit. The purpose is to prevent the transmission of disease carrying organisms.Observation tour of the kitchen on 03/30/2026, beginning at 10:15 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-01 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and the facility policy, Outside Dumpster Policy the facility failed to ensure the outdoor garbage and refuse area was maintained in a sanitary manner, creating the potential for harboring pests and insects. Findings include:A review of the facility's undated policy titled Outside Dumpster Policy revealed several key requirements. Under General Waste Disposal, dumpster lids must remain closed at all times after use, and trash bags must not be left on the ground or outside the dumpster. In Approved Waste Only, only designated general trash may be disposed of in outside dumpsters. Under Safety Guidelines, staff must report damaged dumpsters or unsafe conditions immediately to maintenance, and the dumpster area must be kept free of debris to prevent slips, trips, and falls.Observation and interview on 03/30/2026 at 10:58 AM of the trash dumpster area, accompanied by the Dietary Manager (DM), revealed that numerous wooden pallets were present behind the dumpsters. The top lids of two of the three dumpsters were open, and the side door of one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the policy titled Resident Dignity & Safe Feeding Policy, the facility failed to maintain dignity for four of 45 sampled residents (R7, R27, R67, and R83). This failure placed the residents at risk for a reduced quality of life in an environment meant to support their well being.Findings Include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Dignity & Safe Feeding Policy, revised 7/23/2025 revealed that Prohibited Practices included Do not feed while standing, rush feeding, feed multiple residents at once, or ignore swallowing difficulty.1.Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for R7, dated 02/01/2026, revealed that Section C (Cognitive Patterns) documented that R7 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 00 (indicating severe cognitive impairment). Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documented that R7 was dependent on eating and with oral hygiene. Section I (Active Diagnoses) documented diagnoses of, but not all inclusive, Alzheimer's disease, feeding difficulties,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the policy titled, Self Administration of Medications at Bedside Policy, [NAME] County Health and Rehabilitation Center, the facility failed to ensure that one of 46 sampled residents, Resident R23, did not have access to self administered medications. This failure had the potential to place Resident R23 at risk for adverse consequences. Findings include:Record review of policy titled, Self- Administration of Medications at Bedside Policy [NAME] County Health and Rehabilitation Center revised 05/03/2025 documented I. Policy Statement -Residents who are capable of safely managing their own medications may be permitted to self-administer medication at the bedside in accordance with physician orders, facility assessment, and applicable state and federal regulations. IV. Eligibility Criteria: Residents are not eligible if they: Have cognitive impairment affecting safety. Have a history of medication misuse. Are at risk for harm to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration - General Guidelines, the facility failed to administer a medication at the correct time for one of eight sampled resident(R) (R6), whose medication was ordered to be given on an empty stomach, and failed to crush and administer medications separately for one of eight sampled R (R60). These failures occurred among eight residents with gastrostomy tubes observed during medication administration. This deficient practice had the potential to place R6 and R60 at risk for medical complications and abnormal laboratory results.Findings Include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration-General Guidelines, effective date 4/1/2016 under Procedures revealed, A. Preparation. 7. Tablet crushing/Capsule opening: Crushing tables may require a physician's order, per facility policy.d. Medications should be crushed and administered individually if administered via tube. B.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, the facility failed to ensure that one of two medication rooms was free of expired medications. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of receiving expired medications.Findings Include: A review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility, effective 4/1/2026, documented under section Expiration Dating (Beyond-Use dating).a.Blister-pack cards and medication vials-12 months from the date of dispensing (where the manufacture's expiration date is longer than 12 months). C.Drugs dispensed in the manufacturer's original container will carry the manufacturer's expiration date. Once opened, these will be good to use until the manufacturer's expiration date is reached unless the medication is: 1. In a multi-dose injectable vial, an ophthalmic medication,3. An item for which the manufacturer has specified as usable life after opening.D. When the original seal of a manufacturer's container or vial is initially broken, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a complete and accurate medical record was maintained for one of three sampled Residents (R1) reviewed for skin conditions. Specifically, R1's medical record did not contain documentation of all care planned skin assessments or consistent documentation of the completion of ordered skin treatments.Findings include:Review of R1's admission Record revealed, the resident had a medical history that included a diagnosis of acute kidney failure.Review of R1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/21/2025 revealed, R1 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, which indicated the resident had moderate cognitive impairment.Review of R1's Care Plan Report included a focus area, initiated 6/14/2023 and revised 3/12/2025, that indicated the resident was incontinent and at risk for complications, including skin irritation and rashes. A focus area, initiated 3/2/2023 and revised 4/6/2023, indicated the resident was at risk for decreased quality of life related to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews and review of the facility policy titled, Food Storage, the facility failed to ensure that all opened food was labeled and dated. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who were on an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage revealed under POLICY: It is the policy of the Food and Nutrition Department that food storage occur in a strictly defined manner as outlined in the procedures below, PURPOSE: To prevent the transmission of disease carrying organisms. ACTION: .2. Stock is rotated so that older items are used first. Products are dated to assure First-In, First-Out procedure is followed. Observation during a tour of the kitchen on 4/14/2025 at 9:45 am revealed the following: Pork sausages, chicken breasts, chicken nuggets, French fries, okra, crispy fried onions, located in the freezer, were not labeled or dated. In an interview on 4/14/2025 at 9:45 am with the [NAME] confirmed that there should be an open date and a use by date labeled on items that have been opened. In an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Standard Precautions the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed for two of eight residents (R) (R37 and R84) during wound care, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed when disposing of used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), and the facility also failed to ensure infection surveillance was conducted monthly. The deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Standard Precautions dated October 2018 revealed under Policy Statement: Standard precautions are used in the care of all residents regardless of their diagnoses or suspected or confirmed infection status. Standard Precautions presume that all blood, body fluids, secretions, and excretions (except sweat), non-intact skin and mucous membranes may contain transmissible infectious agents. 1. Record review revealed R37 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $581K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA