Chulio Hills Health And Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 51 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 39% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 85.9 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.13 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.08 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.98 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.70 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and family interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Notification of Changes, Change in Resident's Condition or Status, the facility's Senior Medical Systems Protocols, and New Facility Procedure, the facility failed to ensure timely physician and responsible party notification regarding a significant change in condition of resident (R) (R3) who had a decline in condition. Harm was identified to have occurred on 2/19/2026 when R3 was hospitalized due to a fall after a decline in condition. Findings included:A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including, but not limited to, cognitive communication deficits, generalized weakness, hypertension, myasthenia gravis, difficulty walking, impaired coordination, multiple orthopedic conditions (including prior hip and shoulder arthroplasties and a healed left humerus fracture), blindness in the left eye, and the need for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and family interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled, Notification of Changes, Change in Resident's Condition or Status, the facility's Senior Medical Systems Protocols, and New Facility Procedure, the facility failed to ensure timely assessment, monitoring, escalation, and clinical management of a resident (R) (R3) who exhibited a progressive change in condition. Harm was identified to have occurred on [DATE], when R3 was hospitalized due to a fall after a decline in condition. Findings included:Review of the facility investigation documents revealed R3 sustained a fall on [DATE] (the facility-reported incident submitted to the State Survey Agency incorrectly documented the date of the fall as [DATE]). Documentation reflected that at approximately 10:20 pm, R3 was discovered on the bathroom floor in her assigned room following an unwitnessed fall. Licensed nursing staff immediately responded and initiated assessment. Due to visible facial injuries,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, the facility failed to ensure a resident (R) (R2) remained free from sexual abuse. Findings included:A review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses including but not limited to left-sided hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, seizure disorder, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and generalized muscle weakness and wasting.A review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 11, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Section GG, functional status, revealed R2 had upper and lower impairment on one side and required substantial maximum assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Section E revealed that no behaviors were exhibited.A review of R2's care plan dated 4/14/2026 identified the resident as high risk…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-12-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surface, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment throughout the facility on the 100, 200, and 300 Halls, the common area near the nurse station, and lobby, related to delay in repairing damaged ceilings tiles and dust-like vents.Findings include:The policy titled Cleaning and Disinfection of Environmental Surface revised date October 2018, revealed under number 10. Environmental surfaces will be disinfected (or cleaned) on a regular basis, when spills occur, and when these surfaces are visibly soiled. 14. Horizontal surfaces will be wet dusted regularly using clean cloths moistened with EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)-registered hospital disinfectant.An observation conducted on 12/16/2025, at 9:33 am, during the initial tour, indicated the presence of dust-like accumulation on the ceiling vents and a broken sheetrock ceiling tile.On 12/18/2025, at 1:05 pm, an interview and observation were conducted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Notification of Changes and Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, the facility failed to notify the responsible party and the Registered Dietician for one of 42 sampled residents (R)(R70) of significant changes in the resident's condition. This deficient practice had the potential to compromise the resident's nutritional management, overall care, and the responsible party's ability to participate in care planning and decision-making.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Notification of Changes revised 1/1/2021, states The purpose of this policy is to ensure the facility promptly informs the resident, consults the resident's physician; and notifies, consistent with his or her authority, the resident's representative when there is a change requiring notification. Further review under the heading Circumstances requiring notification include: section 2. Significant change in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, and review of the facility policy titled Maintaining Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments, the facility failed to accurately complete the Quarterly MDS assessment by not including hospice services for one of twelve residents (R) (R7) on hospice.Findings include:Review of the policy titled, Maintaining Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments revised November 2019, revealed the policy addressed maintenance and retention of MDS records but did not include guidance to ensure accurate coding of services, including hospice services, on Quarterly MDS assessments.Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R7 was admitted into hospice services on 6/11/2025.Review of R7 quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed that section O, Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs, did not indicate hospice services.Interview on 12/16/2025 at 12:53 pm with MDS Registered Nurse (RN) LL revealed that hospice services for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plan for one of 42 sampled residents (R) (R47). Specifically, the facility failed to develop and implement care plan interventions related to oxygen (O2) administration. This deficient practice had the potential to place the resident at risk for inadequate monitoring and improper oxygen administration, which could compromise the resident's health and safety.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Care Plan, revised January 2021, revealed under the section 2, .All Care Assessment Areas (CAAs) triggered by the MDS will be considered in developing the plan of care.Record review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed R47 was admitted with pertinent diagnoses including but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility policy titled, Wound Management Program Pressure Ulcers, the facility failed to ensure that appropriate pressure ulcer prevention interventions were initiated, implemented, monitored, and documented for one of 15 residents (R) (R96) who were identified as being at risk for pressure injuries and who developed a pressure ulcer during the facility stay. This deficient practice had the potential to cause actual harm, including the development and worsening of pressure ulcers, delayed wound healing, increased risk for infection, pain, and decline in skin integrity.Findings include:Review of the policy titled, Wound Management Program Pressure Ulcers revised October 2023 states that: A resident that enters our facility without pressure ulcers will not develop pressure ulcers unless the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that they were unavoidable. Review of section 4 states: Every resident will be assessed upon admission or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, record review, and a review of facility policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R) R89 was administered oxygen therapy in accordance with the physician's orders. Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, revised date 3/5/2024, revealed in section 4. Use of the Concentrator a. When oxygen is ordered for a resident, the nurse will be responsible for initiating use, labeling tubing to include initials and date, and ensure all orders for filter cleaning and humidification into the Computer Order Entry System (CPOE). m. Check the resident's oxygen saturations as ordered by physician. Troubleshoot the concentrator if saturation do not correlate with the resident's clinical presentation.A review of the clinical record for R19 revealed she was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including but not limited to multiple encounter for prophylactic immunotherapy for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV),…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, a review of the facility policy titled, Specific Medication Administration Procedures, and a review of the manufacturer's instructions for steroid inhalers, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate below five percent. An observed medication error rate of 5.71% was identified during 35 medication administration opportunities. Specifically, medication administration errors were observed during two of five medication passes, in which nursing staff failed to instruct residents to rinse and spit after administration of corticosteroid inhalers. This deficient practice has the potential to increase the risk of medication-related side effects.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures, last reviewed on 4/1/2016, revealed the Policy section Q: For steroid inhalers, provide the resident with a cup of water and instruct him/her to rinse the mouth and spit the water back into the cup.Review of the manufacturer's instructions How to use your ELLIPTA inhaler it reads .Rinse your…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0810 — isolated
  Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Adaptive Equipment the facility failed to ensure one of eight residents (R) (R88) received a feeding adaptive equipment device at each meal. This failure had the potential to affect the nutritional independence of R88.Findings include:Review of facility policy, Adaptive Equipment last revised March 2024 documented in Procedures: . 3. The resident will be assessed as needed for appropriateness of the adaptive equipment and make changes as needed to help facilitate independence. Interview on 12/16/2025 at 10:28 am with R88 revealed that her feeding adaptive equipment was usually not on her tray, and that, due to her health/stroke, she has great difficulty eating without it.Observation on 12/16/2025 at 12:30 pm revealed no feeding adaptive equipment served on R88's tray. The menu card revealed in bold letters, Built-Up Utensil (1 Each) under Preferences. R88 indicated that she had to ask the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) to get it for her. She indicated the CNA did get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility policies titled Infection Prevention and Control Program, and Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, the facility failed to maintain appropriate infection control practices. Specifically, a nurse was observed using a box of gloves during wound care and removing it from the resident's room for use with other residents, a staff member failed to adhere to Transmission-Based Precautions by not wearing appropriate PPE (Personal Protective Equipment) and did not perform hand hygiene when entering/exiting an isolation room, and the facility failed to ensure the Infection Prevention and Control Program policy was reviewed and updated annually. These failures had the potential to contribute to the transmission of infectious organisms among residents, staff, and visitors Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, revised October 2018, section 11, Prevention of Infection, subsection a.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,017 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,017 — penalty dated 2024-08-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to RELIABLE HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT — 6 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA