Thomson Health And Rehabilitation

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 28.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 25 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 106.6 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 43 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.10 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility policy reviews, the facility failed to ensure that food items in the kitchen and resident pantries were properly dated and stored. In addition, the facility failed to ensure sanitary conditions in the kitchen and properly clean and sanitize dishes. The deficient practices had the potential to place the 103 residents who received meals from the dietary department at increased risk of foodborne illness.Findings include:On 02/09/26 at 8:40 AM, observation revealed a 0.25-inch-thick cardboard-like cover surrounding the entire kitchen hood system near the oven that was peeling, severely cracked, and flaking for a two-foot-wide by three-foot area. Interview with the Dietary Manager (DM) at the time of the observation verified the problem. On 02/09/26 at 9:00 AM, observation revealed a 2.07-pound container of partially used chicken salad without a date of opening inside the residents' refrigerator in the 400-medication room. Interview with the DM at the time of the observation verified the finding and indicated she would remove the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled Work Orders, Maintenance, the facility failed to ensure one of two sit-to-stand lifts was clean and in good repair. This deficient practice had the potential to place residents at risk of living in a non-home-like environment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Work Orders, Maintenance, revised April 2010, provided by the facility revealed, Policy Statement Maintenance work orders shall be completed in order to establish priority of maintenance service. Policy Interpretation and Implementation 1. In order to establish a priority of maintenance service, work orders must be filled out and forwarded to the Maintenance Director .Observation on 02/11/2026 at 12:16 PM with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 5 in the hallway on the 500 unit revealed a sit-to-stand lift with several exposed foam areas due to missing leather on the knee rest cushion and debris on the footplate. LPN5 confirmed that the sit-to-stand lift was not in good condition and that someone should have submitted a work…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Assessments, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) system in a timely manner for one resident (Resident (R) 99) out of six residents reviewed for accurate assessments in the sample of 37. This deficient practice prevented the transmission of resident-specific information used for payment, quality measures, and ongoing clinical data analysis.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Comprehensive Assessments, revised October 2023, indicated, Policy interpretation and implementation: The facility conducts comprehensive, accurate, standardized, reproducible assessments of each resident's functional capacity using the Resident Assessment Instrument specified by CMS.An admission Assessment - is a comprehensive assessment for a new resident that must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments, the facility failed to complete quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments not less that once every three months, for two resident (Resident (R) 30 and R77) out of six residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 37. This deficient practice prevented the transmission of resident-specific information used for payment, quality measures, and ongoing clinical data analysis.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Assessments, revised October 2023, indicated, Policy interpretation and implementation: Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) required MDS assessments are federally mandated and therefore must be performed for all residents of Medicare and/or Medicaid certified nursing homes. OBRA assessments include Quarterly Assessments. A quarterly assessment must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. It is used to track a resident's status between comprehensive assessment to ensure critical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessments, the facility failed to ensure an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment that reflected the resident's status at the time of the assessment for two (Residents (R)8 and R59) of six residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments in the sample of 31 residents. This failure had the potential to affect nutritional assessments and dietitian evaluations, as well as fall precautions and care planning.Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessments, revised October 2023, indicated: .10. Assessment are completed by staff members who have the skills and qualification to assess relevant care areas and who are knowledgeable about the resident's strengths and areas of decline. 11. All persons who have completed any portion of the MDS resident assessment form must sign the document attesting to the accuracy of such information. 1. Review of R59's admission Record located under the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Sanitation, the facility failed to maintain the ice machine in a clean and sanitary manner. The deficient practice had the potential to cause illness to 103 out of 105 residents who consumed an oral diet. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Sanitation revised 11/2022 revealed, that ice machines should be drained, cleaned, and sanitized. During an observation of the kitchen on 11/18/2024 at 9:47 am with the Dietary Manager (DM) revealed, a black substance was observed on the plastic lining inside the ice machine. Review of the cleaning schedule revealed, the ice machine had been last cleaned on 10/21/2024. Interview with the DM revealed that maintenance was responsible for cleaning the ice machine. The DM confirmed the ice machine was not clean and stated they would have to monitor it better.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer Agreement, the facility failed to provide written hospital transfer notices for three of three Residents (R) (R11, R12, and R43) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 33 residents. The failure had the potential to cause residents to not fully understand the purpose of the hospital transfer. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer Agreement revised March 2017 revealed, the agreement, facilitates the exchange of medical and other information necessary or useful in the care and treatment of residents transferred between the institutions. The policy did not indicate that the resident and/or resident representative (RR) would/does receive a copy of the information or other written notice of transfer. Review of the Notice of Transfer/Discharge form dated March 2017 provided by the Administrator revealed, a form which indicated the reason, time, date, and location of the hospital…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0625 — pattern
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, record review, and review of the facility's policy titled Bed-Holds and Returns, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notices for three of three Residents (R) (R11, R12, and R43) reviewed for hospitalization out of a total sample of 33 residents. The failure had the potential to cause confusion as to what the charge would be after the bed hold expired or if they would have a bed when they returned to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns revised 10/2022 revealed, residents and/or representatives are informed (in writing) of the facility and state (if applicable) bed-hold policies. The policy revealed, the residents or their representative would receive a bed-hold notice, at the time of transfer (or, if the transfer was an emergency, within 24 hours). 1. Review of the Census tab located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed, R11 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the discharge Minimum…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Rights, the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for two of 33 sampled Residents (R) (R24 and R100) by serving meals on styrofoam with plastic utensils and standing to assist with meal intake. This failure created the potential for the residents to be treated in an undignified manner. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure titled Resident Rights with a review date of 1/6/2023 revealed, Employees shall treat all residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. 1. Review of R24's admission Record located under the Profile tab in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) noted R24 was admitted with diagnoses that included eating disorder, unspecified; and adult failure to thrive. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 9/17/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of zero out of 15 indicating R24 was unable to complete the interview. During observations of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interviews, record review, and review the facility's policy titled Resident Rights, the facility failed to honor the resident's right to vote for one of two Residents (R) (R83) who were reviewed for choices out of a total sample of 33 residents. This had the potential for the resident not to be able to make choices that could impact the resident's life. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Rights revised 1/6/2023 revealed, Federal and State laws guaranteed certain basic rights to all residents of the facility including the right to exercise his or her rights as citizens of the United States of America. Review of R83's Face Sheet tab of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R83's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 8/30/2024 and located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMs) score of 15 out of 15 indicating…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 16 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $506K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA