Wrightsville Manor Health and Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 41.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 73.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.31 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.28 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.18 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.47 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.33 to 0.17 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, the facility failed to protect Resident (R1)'s right to be free from sexual abuse by Resident (R2). The facility census was 75. On 2/4/2025, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/4/2025 at 4:13 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 11/29/2024. An Acceptable IJ Removal Plan was received on 2/8/2025. Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and review of the facility's policies as outlined in the Removal Plan, it was validated that the corrective plans and the immediacy of the deficient practice were removed on 2/8/2025. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-14 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record reviews, and a review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, the facility Administration failed to protect one resident (R) (R1) was free from sexual abuse by R2, and the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation following an allegation of resident-to-resident sexual abuse involving two Residents (R) (R1 and R2). This failure resulted in R1 being transferred to the emergency room for evaluation of sexual assault. On 2/4/2025, a determination was made that a situation in which the facility's noncompliance with one or more requirements of participation had the likelihood to cause serious injury, harm, impairment, or death to residents. The facility's Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) were informed of the Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) on 2/4/2025 at 4:13 pm. The noncompliance related to the IJ was identified to have existed on 11/29/2024. A Creditable Allegation of Compliance was received on 2/8/2025. Based on observation, record reviews, review of facility policies as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff and resident interviews, record review, and review of the facility's policies titled Elopement, the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of accident hazards for one of 22 residents (R) (R2) on elopement risk. Specifically, R2 was able to exit the facility without supervision. This deficient practice had the potential to place R2 at increased risk of avoidable injury, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled Elopement revealed the Policy section stated, It is the policy of this facility to take appropriate steps to identify the risk of, prevent, detect, and respond promptly to resident elopement. The Procedure section stated. The facility shall take the following steps to identify, train, prevent, detect, and respond to situations of resident elopement. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and diagnoses included, but were not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications in a manner to prevent cross-contamination for seven of 13 residents (R) (R62, R65, R56, R30, R33, R22, and R45) observed receiving medications. This deficient practice had the potential to place R62, R65, R56, R30, R33, R22, and R45 at risk of avoidable infections. Findings include:1. During continuous observations of the medication pass on 7/29/2025 and beginning at 1:10 pm, the following was observed:1. 1:10 pm: Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was observed preparing a medication for R62. LPN2 opened the medication cart, obtained a medication card, popped a pill into a medication cup, placed the medication card back into the cart, and then locked the cart. LPN2 poured water into a cup and then went outside to the smoking area where R62 was located and administered the medication. R62 drank the water and handed the cup back to LPN2 for disposal. LPN2 then re-entered the building. LPN2 touched the door handle going outside and coming back inside.2. 1:15 pm: LPN2 approached the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of 22 sampled residents (R) (R4) was treated with dignity during dining and during the care of an indwelling urinary catheter. This failure had the potential to place R4 at risk of experiencing low self-esteem and embarrassment.Findings include:Review of the facility's Residents' Right to Care, Treatment, and Services, located in the facility's admission Packet, revealed, . Resident have [sic] the right to expect reasonable continuity of care. This care is given without discrimination in the quality of services based on the source of payment and with respect for personal dignity and privacy .Review of R4's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pseudobulbar affect, generalized anxiety disorder, and abnormal weight loss.Review of R4's significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or their responsible party (RP) a written transfer notice, including the resident's appeal rights and ombudsman contact information, at the time the resident was transferred to the hospital, and failed to send a copy of the notice to the Long Term Care Ombudsman for five of five residents (R) (R6, R7, R28, R71, and R76) reviewed for hospitalizations in a total sample of 22. This deficient practice had the potential to place R6, R7, R28, R71, and R76 and/or their RP at risk of not having the knowledge of where and why a resident was transferred and/or how to appeal the transfer, if desired, and had the potential to contribute to the possible denial of re-admission and loss of the resident's home following a hospitalization for residents transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility’s policy titled, Transfer or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, record review, and review of facility policy titled Foley Catheter Policy, the facility failed to manage a urinary catheter and drainage bag appropriately for one of one resident (R) (R4) reviewed for urinary catheters out of a total sample of 22 residents. This deficient practice had the potential to place R4 at risk of urinary tract complications.Findings include:Review of the facility's undated policy titled Foley Catheter Policy revealed that the policy did not address the proper placement of urinary catheter drainage bags and tubing.Review of R4's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included pseudobulbar affect, generalized anxiety disorder, and abnormal weight loss.Review of R4's Care Plan, located under the Care Plan tab of the EMR, revealed a focus of R4 having an indwelling urinary catheter. Goals included, . will show no s/sx [signs or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication with the dialysis center, failed to monitor the dialysis access site, and failed to have documented blood pressures and weights, as ordered by the physician, for one of one resident (R) (R9) reviewed for dialysis out of a total sample of 22. These deficient practices had the potential to place R9 at increased risk of complications related to dialysis. Findings include:Review of R9's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis.Review of R9's Physician Orders, located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed the following orders:3/3/2023 - weigh on non-dialysis days every Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday5/23/2023 - take blood pressure every day shift2/8/2024 - assess right permacath (dialysis access site) site…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record review, review of manufacturer's guidelines, and review of facility policies titled Insulin Administration, and Administering Medications through a Handheld Nebulizer, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent for four of 13 residents (R) (R64, R48, R7, and R16) observed during the medication pass out of a total sample of 22 residents. There were four errors out of 34 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 11.76 percent. These failures had the potential to place R64, R48, R7, and R16 at risk of not receiving the prescribed dosage of medication.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Insulin Administration, dated 09/2014, revealed no documentation related to priming insulin pens.Review of the facility's undated policy titled Administering Medications through a Handheld Nebulizer, revealed no documentation related to the fit of a nebulizer mask. Review of the manufacturer's Flex Pen package insert,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident and staff interviews and record review, the facility failed to document an episode of hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) for one of five residents (R) (R8) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 22. This deficient practice had the potential to place R8 at increased risk for medical complications.Findings include: Review of R8's admission Record, located under the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included type 2 diabetes mellitus.Review of R8's Physician Order, dated 6/13/2025 and located under the Orders tab of the EMR, revealed R8 was to have fingerstick blood sugar (FSBS) checks before meals and at bedtime. It was recorded that the physician was to be notified if R8's blood sugar level was below 80 or greater than 400. Review of R8's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/25/2025 and located under the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R8 had a Brief…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of the facility policies titled, Food Storage, General HACCP Guidelines for Food Safety, and Cleaning Dishes - Manual Dishwashing the facility failed to label and date opened food items in the reach-in refrigerator, dry storage area, and walk-in freezer. In addition, the facility failed to properly thaw food items to prevent food borne illness and failed to demonstrate the correct usage of the three compartment sink to prevent cross contamination. The facility census was 83 with 76 residents consuming an oral diet. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Food Storage revealed Refrigerated food storage - leftover food should be stored in covered containers or wrapped carefully and securely and clearly labeled and dated before being refrigerated. The policy stated Frozen Foods - all foods should be covered, labeled, and dated. Observation on 10/6/2023 at 8:25 am of the two door reach-in refrigerator next to the milk refrigerator revealed the following items were opened with no date: One gallon container Banana…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a review of facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Policy, and Glucometer Policy, the facility failed to practice acceptable infection control practices to prevent possible cross-contamination by not ensuring resident bath basins and urinals were labeled and covered for 10 of 44 rooms. In addition, the facility failed to ensure a glucometer (a device used to measure blood sugar levels) was disinfected after each use and prior to use on other residents for two of three residents (R) (R18 and R3) and failed to provide a clean barrier between clean and contaminated surfaces. This failure had the potential to expose patients to infections due to cross-contamination. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy entitled Infection Prevention and Control Policy revealed the facility would follow evidence-based guidelines, regulations, and standards for infection prevention. Observation on 10/7/2023 at 3:02 p.m. of the bathroom shared by rooms 101…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$74,208 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $64,279 — penalty dated 2025-02-14
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-10-08
• $6,201 — penalty dated 2023-10-08

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 14 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 81% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $385K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in GA