No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Guam Memorial Hospital Authority

449 N Sabana Dr, Barrigada, GU 96913 · Government - State · 40 certified beds · (671) 633-1800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (671) 633-1800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$13,247 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (16% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (51) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $13,247 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-22)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased0.0%0.0%15.4%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.0%3.0%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder4.2%4.2%0.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection12.1%12.1%2.0%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.7%4.7%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%0.0%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.0%7.0%18.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.0%6.0%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control0.0%0.0%21.2%check this — see note marked star below the table
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%0.0%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.6%90.6%79.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 54 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.57U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.31hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.26hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.57 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.2%CMS range 55.4–77.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 7.9–17.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 3.5–10.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.48
RN hours/ resident / day
1.56
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.68
Aide hours/ resident / day
7.72
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.39
RN hoursweekends
15.6%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 19.7 residents a day — about 49% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.48 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.68 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 7.01 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.01 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.52 to 2.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 16% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

16
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-06-06)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2025-08-22)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

51 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-08-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor the rights of one of one resident (Resident(R)28) reviewed for choices to make decisions about their care. Specifically, staff failed to provide showers for R28 prior to going to dialysis treatments due to lack of available linens.This failure resulted in R28 experiencing psychosocial harm as exhibited by decreased engagement in social activities, apathy and withdrawal, and refusal of care. Findings:On 08/18/25 at 10:58 AM, R28 was observed lying in bed in her room, watching television. R28 was alert and stated she wanted to share her concerns; however, she is going to dialysis so would like to speak the next day. Transport arrived after a couple of minutes. On 08/19/25 at 09:35 AM, a follow-up interview was conducted with R28, inside her room. R28 stated the facility had been short of linens. R28 reported that she goes to dialysis three times a week and, on dialysis days, she prefers to take a shower. However, on most days, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-06-06 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — widespread
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to implement a regular maintenance program to ensure bed systems, including bed rails, mattresses, and frames, were inspected for safety and potential entrapment hazards. The facility did not conduct routine assessments of mattress fit or measure potential entrapment zones in accordance with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance. This had the potential to affect 14 of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) R2, R3, R5, R8, R11, R12, R4, R9, R13, R22, R23, R25, R26 and R27) who used bed rails and had the potential to result in injury related to bed entrapment or bed system malfunction. Findings include: 1.Observation on 06/04/26 at 8:22 AM, R2 was in bed with 1/3 bed rails raised time (x) 3 (two rails at the head of his bed and one 1/3 rail at the foot of his bed. On 06/04/26 at 10:29 AM, 12:00 PM, 1:39 PM and 4:21 PM, R2 was in his bed with 1/3 bed rails raised x 2 at the head of his bed. On 06/05/26 at 9:49 AM, R2 was observed in his bed with two 1/3 bed rails at the head of his bed in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-06-06 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, review of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure alternatives were attempted prior to the use of bed/side rails for 6 of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) R2, R3, R5, R8, R11 and R12) reviewed for bed/side rails. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of resident accidental entrapment, suffocation, serious injury, or death. Findings include: 1. Review of R2's undated Patient Data located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of stroke-like symptoms. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/23/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk, revealed a behavior interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated that the resident was independent with moving about in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to advise one of five residents (R12) reviewed for unnecessary medications of the risks and benefits for psychotropic medication use. This failure had the potential to affect the care provision, discharge planning, and/or informed consent for psychotropic medications. Findings include: Review of R12's undated Patient Data located in the EMR revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and Failure to Thrive. Review of R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/24/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk revealed a Brief interview of mental status (BMS) score of five out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R12's Doctor's Orders Report dated 06/03/26and d in the EMR revealed an order, with an initial order date of 05/30/26, for Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligram (mg)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, record review, observation and document review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate sized incontinence products were available for one (Resident (R) 13) of 19 residents in the survey sample. This failure had the potential to negatively affect R13's dignity and skin integrity. Findings include:During an interview on 06/01/26 at 1:08 PM, R13 queried if the facility had any large size briefs as the mediums briefs did not fit. The request was passed on to the Director of Nursing (DON) on 06/01/26 at 1:30 PM. During a follow-up interview and observation on 06/04/26 at 10:39 AM regarding whether large briefs had been provided, R13 stated, No and asked if he could show what was being used. R13 lowered the sheet to show an incontinence brief under him attached to an absorbent bed pad (also known as chux) tucked in over the top of the groin area. R13 stated, this has been going on for a while now. Review of R13's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/14/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure require Notification of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC advisements were provided to two of three residents (Resident (R) 29 and R30) to ensure that residents were give two days in advance notice of Medicare A services ending. This failure had the potential for residents to incur unauthorized expenses and/or forfeit the time granted for an appeal to Medicare. Findings include:1. Review of R29's facility provided Patient Data revealed an admission date of 01/19/26 with diagnosis of post-surgical right femur fracture. Review of the facility provided NOMNC worksheet indicated for R29 the Medicare A services start date was 01/19/26 with the last covered day of services was 02/02/26. Review of the facility provided NOMNC form showed the last covered day noted was 02/02/26 and that R29 signed the form on 02/02/26. During an interview on 06/06/26 at 2:59PM, the Hospital Utilization Specialist ([NAME]) confirmed the NOMNC was to be issued…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-06 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two Residents (R)2 and R12) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication was free from potential chemical restraints. The facility's failure to ensure residents were free from unnecessary chemical restraints created the potential for this and other residents to receive medication that is not necessary or desired related to their psychiatric/mental health care. Findings include: 1.Review of R2's undated Patient Data located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke-like symptoms and type 2 diabetes. Review of R2's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The MDS indicated that the resident was receiving an antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0636 — isolated
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was completed within the time frame required by the RAI Manual for one of 19 sampled residents (Resident (R) 21). This failure had the potential for inaccurate or incomplete care planning and/or provision of care to the resident, and/or inaccurate reimbursement for services.During the tour of the facility, R21 was observed in his room on 06/01/26 at 11:02AM. Review of the facility provided resident matrix document did not indicated that R21 was a new admission admitted within the past 30 days. Review of the facility provided Patient Data sheet revealed R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview on 06/03/26 at 3:45PM when inquiring about a list of names that needed MDS assessment reviews, the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) provided a note that indicated that R21's admission (comprehensive) MDS with an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were transmitted within the timeframes specified in the RAI manual for nine of 19 residents (Resident (R)1, R4, R7, R9, R22, R27, R2, R3 and R12) MDSs reviewed during the survey. This failure had the potential for inaccurate or incomplete care planning and/or provision to the resident, the resident being discharged may not be able to receive services elsewhere because Medicare was not aware of the discharge status, and/or a lack of appropriate payment for services to the facility. Findings include: 1.Review of R1's facility provided undated Patient Data revealed an admission date of 01/20/26. Review of the validation report provided by the MDS Coordinator (MDSC) revealed a quarterly MDS with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/27/26 found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk, was not transmitted until 06/02/26. 2. Review of R4's facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-06 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for one of 19 residents (Resident (R) 12) reviewed. The MDS did not accurately reflect the resident's receipt of antipsychotic medication during the look-back period. This failure had the potential to result in inaccurate information being used for care planning an clinical decision-making. Findings include: Review of R12's undated Patient Data located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and Failure to Thrive. Review of R12's Doctor's Orders Report revealed an order, with an initial order date of 07/18/25, for the resident to receive Quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 milligram (mg) once daily at bedtime. Review of R12's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/24/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk, indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-06 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Pre admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 evaluation was completed for one (Residents (R)12) out of one resident reviewed for PASARR. The facility's failure to ensure the appropriate PASARR assessment was completed created the potential for residents to have unmet psychological/psychiatric needs while residing in the facility. Findings include:Review of R12's undated Patient Data located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. Review of R12's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/24/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of five out of 15, which indicated the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Review of R12's EMR revealed no documentation that the PASARR Screening Level 1 had been completed prior to R12's admission to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Show the remaining 40 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure two of 19 residents (Resident (R) R4 and R22) had comprehensive person-centered care plans for each resident, with measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and/or psychosocial needs as identified during a comprehensive assessment. This failure had the potential to affect the care and/or quality of life experienced by the resident while at the facility. Findings include:1. Review of R4's facility provided undated Patient Data revealed a readmission date of 05/27/26 with diagnoses of history of cerebral vascular accident (stroke), fever from urinary tract infection, and bedbound.Observations of R4 on 06/01/26 at 11:45 AM and 1:23 PM; and 06/02/26 at 2:14 PM in bed with bilateral upper half rails in the up position with blue pads wrapped around them; and on 06/05/26 at 12:25 in bed with all four bed rails in the up position with the blue padding attached to all four rails.Observation on 06/06/26 at 9:12 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure routine dental services were provided for one (Resident (R)5) out of two residents reviewed for dental services in the sample of 19 residents. The facility's failure to ensure dental services were provided for R5 created the potential for the resident to experience complications and/or pain related poor dentition. Findings include: Review of R5's undated Patient Data located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of history of stroke. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/22/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score that was not able to be completed due to the resident's poor cognition. The MDS indicated no oral or dental problems. Review of R5's Doctor's Orders Report dated 06/03/26 and found in the EMR revealed no physician's orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for influenza and pneumococcal vaccination status and offered and/or provided indicated vaccines, or that refusal, contraindication, or prior vaccination status was documented, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident (R) 19) reviewed for vaccinations. This failure had the potential to increase the risk for R19 to contract influenza and/or pneumococcal disease and experience adverse health outcomes. Findings include:Review of R19's undated Patient Data located in the Electronic Medical Record (EMR), revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was over the age of 65 at the time of admission. Review of R19's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/21/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of R19's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-06 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for COVID-19 vaccination status and offered and/or provided the COVID-19 vaccine, or that refusal, contraindication, or prior vaccination status was documented for two of five residents (Resident (R) 13 and R19) reviewed for vaccinations out of a total sample of 19. This failure had the potential to increase the risk of COVID-19 infection and serious illness. Findings include: Findings include: 1. Review of R13's facility provided undated Patient Data revealed an admission date of 09/07/25. Review of R13's quarterly MDS with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/14/26 and found in a folder kept at the nurse's desk revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15, indicative of being cognitively intact. Review of the Infection Preventionist (IP) Nurses Note dated 09/17/25 at 3:55 PM provided by the IP revealed, COVID-l9 VACCINATION: Offered and educated resident on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food safety standards when:1. The box of dishwasher heater booster and the storage cart were rusty.2. The hinge and handle of the food steam table had a thick whitish, black and brownish build-up.3. Staff food items were stored inside the kitchen walk-in refrigerator where the residents' food items were stored.4. Tray line or plating was not performed in a sanitary manner and food items were not measured accordingly.Failure to provide a food production environment that is safe and sanitary may result in foodborne illness, cross contamination of food and equipment and use of expired ingredients that may affect flavor and/or texture of food. Foodborne illness and cross contamination may result in gastrointestinal distress and in severe instances may result in death. This had the potential to affect 17 residents who received meals from the facility. Findings:1.During the initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS) on 08/18/25 at 9:00 AM, the box of dishwater heater booster and the two-tier…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure its governing body appointed an administrator who is licensed pursuant to Guam Code Annotated (GCA), and responsible for the management of the facility, reporting to and being accountable to the governing body. The facility had no Administrator since April 2024. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oversight and lack of accountability, leading to supplies not being consistently available to residents, including essential items such as linens and colostomy bags placing residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.Findings:On 08/18/25 at 08:50 AM, during the entrance conference attended by the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Medical Director (MD), both stated that the facility did not have an administrator. Without being prompted, the MD introduced himself as overseeing clinical work, with no administrative oversight of the facility. When asked, when the facility had been without an administrator, the DON stated that this had been the case since April 2024.On 08/18/25 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by not conducting quarterly meetings for three consecutive quarters, and when a meeting was held in July 2025, the team failed to address an ongoing supply concern. In addition, there was no system in place for obtaining feedback and input for direct care staff and residents, including how such input would be used to identify and address problems. These failures limited the facility's ability to identify systemic problems, implement corrective actions, and monitor effectiveness, placing residents at risk for unmet needs.Findings:Review of the QAPI plan submitted during the entrance conference titled QAPI Plan 2024, revealed indicators and measures derived from survey results spanning 2019 through 2023. The QAPI plan did not contain indicators, measures, or performance improvement projects for 2025.On 08/22/25 at 03:01 PM, an interview and concurrent review of the facility's QAPI program was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee met at least quarterly and evaluated activities under the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, including identifying issues related to QAA activities and implementing performance improvement projects (PIP) as required. In addition, the facility's QAA committee failed to include the administrator, owner, board member or designee.This failure had the potential to result in failure to identify and correct systemic problems, such as supply shortages, leading to unresolved issues that negatively impact the quality of care and services provided to residents.Findings:On 08/22/25 at 03:01 PM, an interview and concurrent review of the facility's QAA and QAPI program was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON), Medical Director (MD), and Compliance Officer (CO). The DON stated the Skilled Nursing Unit (SNU) had not held QAA committee meetings because there was no administrator in place to oversee the process. The CO stated she played a supportive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement an effective infection control program in accordance with internal policies and procedures, nationally recognized infection control guidelines and regulations when:1. Hand hygiene was not performed before entering the kitchen and tray line and in between changing of gloves during medication preparation. 2. The facility water management plan (WMP) did not include testing protocols, acceptable ranges for control measures, and corrective actions when control limits are not maintained to prevent growth of opportunistic waterborne pathogens such as Legionella bacteria. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Legionella is a type of bacteria that causes Legionnaires' disease a serious lung infection. 3. Staff were not provided with updated infection control training and education. (Refer to F945) 4. The Facility Infection Control Policy was not updated to reflect current federal requirements. (Refer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Control Officer (ICO) was performing the duties of an infection preventionist (IP) who is responsible for implementing programs and activities to prevent and control infection.This failure resulted in improper implementation of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) that may contribute to cross contamination of infection and jeopardize the health and safety of residents and staff.Findings: In an observation on 08/19/25 at 01:36 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 don on gloves and started mixing the intravenous antibiotics. LPN1 removed the gloves, did not perform hand hygiene and took the medication inside the room.On 08/20/25 at 08:29 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 did not perform hand hygiene in between tasks during administration of Resident 10's medication. RN1 was observed using the same gloves throughout the entire medication administration process and hand hygiene was not performed.On 08/20/25 at 09:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 residents (Resident[R]1, 5, 7, 13, 15) reviewed for advance directives were provided with information about advance directives. In addition, the facility failed to obtain and maintain a copy of the advance directive in the medical record so that it was readily retrievable by any facility staff. The facility did not develop policy and procedure to implement advance directives.This failure put the resident at risk for not having his wishes for treatment known and had the potential for the resident's decision regarding his healthcare and treatment options not being honored. For R5: Review of face sheet (admission record) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility 12/12/24. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) with assessment reference date of 06/19/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15 indicating R5 had no cognitive impairment. Review of the hospital’s Advance Directive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an adequate supply of bed and bath linens to meet the care needs of 19 of 19 residents residing in the Skilled Nursing Unit (SNU). This failure resulted in residents not receiving scheduled showers and having unchanged bed linens. The lack of adequate linens had the potential to compromise resident dignity, comfort, and hygiene, and increased the risk for skin breakdown and infection.Findings:On 08/19/25 at 09:35 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident (R) 28, the facility's Resident Council President, inside her room. R28 stated the facility had been short of linens. R28 reported that she goes to dialysis three times a week and, on dialysis days, she prefers to take a shower. However, staff informed her that there were no linens available, so showers could not be provided. Instead, the Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) would provide a wipe down. R28 stated, like yesterday, I only got a wipe down.I am also speaking for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-22 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 73 out of 75 employees are provided with education regarding benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccine. This failed practice prevented employees to make an informed decision about COVID-19 vaccination.Findings:In an interview on 08/21/25 at 02:51 PM, the Infection Control Officer (ICO) stated that she oversees infection control training and education for the staff.In an interview on 08/22/25 at 01:49 PM, Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) 1 stated that she did not received education regarding COVID-19 vaccination. In an interview on 08/22/25 at 01:56 PM, the ICO stated that only three out of 75 total employees were updated on COVID-19 vaccination. ICO explained that COVID-19 vaccination education was provided to the staff by giving them handouts.In a follow-up interview on 08/22/25 at 02:16 PM, ICO stated that all of the staff are not provided with education about benefits and risks and potential side effects associated with COVID-19 vaccination. ICO explained, COVID [19]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — pattern
    Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff received an infection prevention and control program in-service training to support current scope and standard of practice specifically for current COVID-19 vaccination requirement and Enhanced Barrier Precaution (EBP) practices for six of six staff (RN1, RN2, LPN1, CNA1, CNA3 and CNA4) reviewed over 75 total facility staff.This failure could affect the proper implementation of current infection prevention practices and placed residents at risk of not receiving appropriate care and services that could jeopardize their health and safety. Findings:In an interview on 08/21/25 at 02:41 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 stated, I cannot remember the last time we received in-service or training for infection control. RN1 stated that the EBP was implemented because the previous [CMS] surveyor taught us what to do. Who is the patient needs EBP. We (staff) implement it ourselves. We did not receive in-service training about it. In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided care in a manner that promoted dignity and respect for two of 19 residents (Resident(R)5 and R12) during dining observation. A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was observed standing over R5 and R12 while assisting the residents with their meals. This failure had the potential to negatively impact the residents.Findings:For R12:On 08/18/2025 at11:38 AM, R12 was observed in bed with the head of the bed elevated to approximately 90 degrees, Bed was in low position. CNA5 was observed assisting R12 with lunch while standing over the resident. R12's eye level was observed at approximately the level of CNA5's chest. After a few spoonfuls of food, R12 stated she was done.For R5:On 08/18/2025 at 11:49 AM, R5 was observed in bed with the head of bed elevated to approximately 45 degrees after CNA5 adjusted the bed at the resident's request. CNA5 was observed spoon-feeding R5 while standing over the resident. At that time, R5's eye level was approximately at the level of CNA5's chest. After…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident(R)6) reviewed for unnecessary medications was free from unnecessary psychotropic drug use. Specifically, R6's antipsychotic medication was increased on 10/23/24 despite no documented behaviors and did not attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) even though no behaviors had been documented since the increase through present. This failure had the potential to result in oversedation, worsening cognitive decline, increased confusion, and loss of independence. Findings: On 08/18/25 at 10:43 AM, R6 was observed seated in her wheelchair in the activities area, doing coloring activity with another resident led by recreation staff. R6 responded when greeted Review of Face sheet (admission record) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility 07/18/24, with diagnoses including dementia.Review of a physician's order dated 10/23/24, revealed an order for quetiapine (antipsychotic medication) 25 mg tablet, give one tablet by mouth at bed time for Alzheimer's with behavioral adjustment.Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate and complete for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Resident(R)19 and 23). R19's MDS indicated she was receiving insulin and diuretic, when she was not.R23's discharge MDS was not completed.These failures had the potential to result in inaccurate care planning and failure to meet the residents' care needs.Findings:For R19:Review of Face sheet (admission record) revealed R19 was admitted to the facility 07/20/25 with diagnoses including left hip fracture.Review of the MDS with assessment reference date of 07/25/25 revealed Section N for medications, which showed that the number of injections received by R19 during the last 7 days was coded as 7. The number of days insulin injections were received during the last 7 days was also coded as 7. The MDS further indicated that R19 was taking a diuretic.However, review of the physician's orders and the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for July 2025…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff adhered to professional standards related to addressing weight variance for one of three residents (Resident [R] 7) reviewed for nutrition. The deficient practice could potentially delay the implementation of appropriate measures to prevent unintended weight loss or weight gain before complications arise. Findings:Review of R7's medical record indicated, R7 was re-admitted in the facility after hospitalization on 08/01/25 with diagnoses including recurrent urinary tract infection (UTI) and stage IV decubitus ulcer (severe form of skin damage). In an interview on 08/19/2025 at 10:06 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 explained that staff weigh residents on the first and 15th day of the month.Review of R7's weight records indicated the following:08/01/25 = 89.5 kilograms (kgs)08/15/25 = 85.9 kgs (4% weight loss in two weeks)08/17/25 = 92.8 kgs (8% weight gain in two days)On 08/20/25, at 09:38 AM, the Registered Dietician (RD)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of two residents with a colostomy (a surgical opening in the abdomen that allows waste to pass into a bag) had an adequate supply of colostomy bags (special pouches used to collect waste from the opening) required for proper care. Due to lack of supply, staff washed the colostomy bags. This resulted in residents being required to use rewashed bags, which are not designed for reuse. This deficient practice resulted in R28's reports of humiliation and embarrassment related to odor and the awareness that others might notice it.Findings:On 08/19/25 at 09:35 AM, an interview was conducted with R28, inside her room. R28 stated she has a colostomy, pointing to a bulge on her left abdominal area, and reported that the facility often runs out of colostomy bags. R28 stated, this is not reusable. R28 reported that Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) wash out the colostomy bags when no new ones are available.When asked when this last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure accurate administration of medications to meet the needs of 1 of 5 residents (Resident(R)16) observed during medication administration. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the physician's order when administering medication to R16. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective treatment.Findings:On 08/20/2025 at 8:43 AM, during a medication administration observation for R16, Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed preparing and administering medications, including one tablet of multivitamin with minerals. R16 swallowed all oral medications without difficulty.However, review of the physician's order dated 08/17/25 revealed an order for multivitamin, one tablet by mouth daily. The order did not include minerals.On 08/20/25 at 11:55 AM, an interview and concurrent review of the R16's physician's order was conducted with RN 1. RN 1 verified the order was for multivitamin only, but she administered a multivitamin with minerals. RN 1 stated she was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe storage of medications for one of two medication cart observation when the first side medication cart was not locked and left unattended.The deficient practice had potential for unauthorized people to have access to medications.Findings:On 08/20/2025, at 8:22 AM, the first side medication cart was observed in front of room [ROOM NUMBER] not locked and unattended.In an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 1 on 08/20/2025, at 8:23 AM, RN1 opened the medication cart and stated, It's not locked. It should be closed and secured or locked for safety reasons. Someone can steal medications. RN 1 explained that the nurse in charge of the medication cart was attending to a resident inside the room.Review of the facility policy, titled Storage of Medications in Patient Care Areas, dated 07/01/2009 indicated, Medication will be stored in secured carts or drawers at all times when not in use.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0645 — widespread
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure that Level I PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) (screening for mental disorders (MD) and intellectual disabilities (ID)) was completed for 13 out of 13 residents who resided in the facility. The deficient practice resulted in the potential for residents with MD and/or ID not being identified, evaluated, and/or receiving care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Findings include: During an interview conducted on 08/06/24 at 1:45 PM with the Social Worker (SW) she stated that she did not know what a PASARR was. She stated that she had not been doing them. On 08/07/24 at 2:05 PM an interview was conducted with the MDS (Minimum Data Set) (comprehensive resident assessment) Coordinator. She stated that she had heard of the PASARR but was trained only as it related to information on the MDS assessment in Section A1500. She stated that she thought it was her responsibility but that they did not do them there. On 08/09/24 at 8:23 AM an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, review of records, and policy, the facility failed to ensure the Comprehensive Care Plans were complete for 2 of 13 sampled residents (residents (R) R55, R51, and R106). Specifically: 1) The facility failed to ensure that foot wounds were included for R51; and 2) The facility failed to ensure that poor dentition was included for R51 and R106. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for residents and/or to ensure that measurable objectives and timeframes were determined to meet the residents' physical, mental, and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment in order to meet their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: For R51: R51 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE]. According to the resident's Face Sheet, her admitting diagnosis was an infected decubitus (pressure) ulcer to the sacrum. Regarding foot wounds: On 07/05/24 at 1:35 PM a physician progress note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record review and policy, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer care and treatment was provided to one of one sampled residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident (R) 51) in accordance with professional standards of practice. Specifically: 1) The facility did not document an admission wound assessment that included measurements, a description of the wound bed and surrounding tissue, or any exudate (drainage). 2) The facility failed to document weekly wound assessments. 3) The facility failed to ensure wound assessments were complete and thorough. The deficient practice increased the resident's risk for pain, infection, and rehospitalization. Findings include: R51 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE]. According to the resident's Face Sheet, her admitting diagnosis was an infected decubitus (pressure) ulcer. A risk for pressure ulcer care plan with a start date of 01/12/23 related to sacral ulcer and DTI (deep tissue injury) to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure 2 out of 5 residents reviewed (Residents (R) 55 and R54) did not receive psychotropic medications without 1) adequate indication and 2) behavior monitoring. The deficient practice increased the risk for residents to receive psychotropic medications unnecessarily. Findings include: For R55: R55 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of acute pulmonary edema (a life-threatening condition that occurs when fluid builds up in the lungs, making it difficult to breathe.) A physician's progress note dated 07/17/24 at 8:37 PM included that the resident's History and Present Illness included a history of behavioral disorder (maladaptive behavior (actions that prevent people from adapting to life and participating in daily activities), personal distress (anxiety, worry, discomfort), statistical rarity (behaviors that are uncommon or rare in a population), violation of social norms (actions that go against what most…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of records, and policy, the facility failed to provide a written notice to the resident and/or the resident's representative of an emergency transfer for 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident (R) 51). This failure did not afford the resident and/or their representative to make informed decisions about transfers and prohibited access to an advocate who could inform the resident/representative of their options and rights. Findings include: Review of the Active Problems list dated 10/22/22 revealed the resident admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) and congestive heart failure (a long-term condition that happens when the heart can't pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply). Review of the Transfer to emergency room Department dated 06/06/24 at 08:13 AM revealed the resident was transferred to the ER (Emergency Room) for stroke-like symptoms and tachycardia. A nursing progress note dated 06/06/24 at 02:04 PM included that the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, record review, and policy, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident (R) 51) received a written bed-hold notice/policy upon emergent transfer to the hospital. This failure had the potential to contribute to possible denial of re-admission following a hospitalization for residents transferred emergently to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the Active Problems list dated 10/22/22 revealed R51 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) and congestive heart failure (a long-term condition that happens when the heart can't pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply). Review of the Transfer to emergency room Department dated 06/06/24 at 08:13 AM revealed the resident was transferred to the ER (Emergency Room) for stroke-like symptoms and tachycardia. A nursing progress note dated 06/06/24 at 02:04 PM included that the resident returned from the ER via transport around 12:55 PM. However, the facility was unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool) was accurate for one of 9 sampled residents (Resident (R) 51). This failure posed the risk of the resident not receiving an individualized plan of care based upon their specific needs. Findings include: Review of the Active Problems list dated 10/22/22 revealed R51 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) and congestive heart failure (a long-term condition that happens when the heart can't pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply). The annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] included Section L, Oral/Dental Status. Review of the assessment indicated the resident had no dental issues, including obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. A Dietician Note dated 04/25/24 at 11:36 AM indicated the resident's dentition status included broken teeth or cavities. The Quarterly MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, record and policy, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was updated/revised for one of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident (R) R51). As a result of the deficient practice the resident did not meet her targeted goals in response to the current interventions. Findings include: R51 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE]. According to the resident's Face Sheet, her admitting diagnosis was an infected decubitus (pressure) ulcer. A risk for pressure ulcer care plan with a start date of 01/12/23 related to sacral ulcer and DTI (deep tissue injury) to bilateral heels had a long-term goal to be free of pressure ulcers, redness, blisters, or discolorations. Interventions included to assess, document, and report skin status or any appearance of blisters, redness, ulcer: size, color, stage. Review of the physician's notes dated 01/26/23 through 02/29/23 revealed the sacral wound was stable/slow progress. Physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and review of records and policy, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident (R) 51) received care and services for foot wounds consistent with professional standards of practice. The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for pain, infection and rehospitalization. Findings include: R51 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and subsequently readmitted on [DATE]. According to the resident's Face Sheet, her admitting diagnosis was an infected decubitus (pressure) ulcer to the sacrum. The SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility) admission assessment dated [DATE] indicated that the residents health history included diabetes (a disease in which the body's ability to produce or respond to the hormone insulin is impaired, resulting in abnormal metabolism of carbohydrates and elevated levels of glucose in the blood and urine), uncontrolled, with complications. However, review of the resident's comprehensive plan of care provided no evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of the record, the facility failed to provide an assessment of the hemodialysis (HD) access site following off-site dialysis for one of one residents, Resident (R) 107, who received hemodialysis (HD) treatments. This deficient practice could result in complications from dialysis not being addressed timely requiring interventions or hospitalization. Findings include: Review of [NAME]'s Caring for a patient's vascular access for hemodialysis -- Maintaining vascular access for hemodialysis included A PATIENT IN END-STAGE kidney disease relies on dialysis to mechanically remove fluid, electrolytes, and waste products from the blood. For the most effective hemodialysis, the patient needs good vascular access with an arteriovenous (AV) fistula or an AV graft that provides adequate blood flow. Follow your facility's policies and procedures and these clinical tips to protect and preserve the vascular access and avoid complications such as infection, stenosis, thrombosis, and hemorrhage: .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, review of records, and policy, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents reviewed for dental services (Resident (R) 51) was provided with routine dental care to meet her needs. This deficient practice had the potential for the resident's routine dental needs to worsen and become emergent needs. Findings include: Review of the Active Problems list dated 10/22/22 revealed R51 admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm) and congestive heart failure (a long-term condition that happens when the heart can't pump blood well enough to give the body a normal supply). A physician's note dated 10/05/23 included SS (Social Service) for dental appointment; no dental coverage; request PHSS (Preparedness Health and Safety Services) for coverage; she is not able to sit up in dental chair and may be a barrier for dental care. A follow up entry in the progress notes indicated - dental appt 10/13. However, no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — isolated
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the Facility Assessment (FA), the facility failed to conduct, document, and annually review its facility-wide assessment. The facility used a facility assessment tool as a template in place of an up to date and accurate assessment to identify the needs of its residents. The deficient practice placed all residents in the facility at an increased risk of harm. Findings include: Review the Facility assessment dated [DATE] included an Administrator [Administrator 2] and Medical Director [Medical Doctor 2 (MD)] that was no longer at the facility. The assessment also indicated that it have been reviewed by the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement committee on February 28, 2023. Review of the Quality Assurance Assessment Committee included a new medical director [MD 1] and listed the Director of Nursing (DON) as both the Nursing Unit Supervisor and Long-Term Care Administrator. During an interview conducted 08/09/24 at 11:28 AM, the DON stated they had taken over as the Administrator in April of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to make copies of medical records readily accessible to CMS surveyor requests when the staff unnecessarily delayed requested records during an annual recertification survey. Good documentation is important to protect patients, promotes patient safety and quality of care. Complete and accurate medical recordkeeping can help ensure that patients get the right care at the right time (from a transcript for audio podcast: Importance of Documentation, the office of the Inspector General). These failures have the potential to negatively impact resident care and safety. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A request for medical records for Resident 107 (R) was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 01:40 PM. On 08/08/24 at 02:02 PM an email was sent to get a status update on the requested records for R107. The response was the facility was still working on getting the records. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the QAPI program made a good faith attempt to implement corrective actions implemented corrective actions for non-compliance identified in September of 2023. The facility continues to not allow residents to received off-site Hemodialysis (HD) from anyone other than Guam Memorial Hospital (GMH). Administrative decisions and lack of action to advocate for SNF resident rights to choose physician and medical providers created barriers to receive care in accordance with medical needs and resident preferences. Findings include: Review of the Visit Summary located in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated Resident (R) 107 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Anterior STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, heart attack), ESRD (End-Stage Renal Disease, medical condition in which a person's kidneys cease functioning) on HD (Hemodialysis, a treatment to filter wastes and water from your blood), seizure…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2026-06-06 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, document review, policy review and review of the Guam Code Annotated (GCA), the facility failed to ensure its governing body appointed a Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) who was licensed and responsible for the management of the facility, reporting and being accountable to the governing body. This failure had the potential to result in ineffective oversight and lack of accountability and to affect all the residents of the facility. Findings include: During an interview during entrance conference on 06/01/26 at 10:06 AM with the Director of Nursing (DON), the Administrative Officer (AO), and Medical Director, the DON confirmed she was the Acting Administrator and did not have an Administrator's licensed. Review of the file provided on 06/02/26 by the Hospital Quality, Patient Safety and Regulatory Compliance Administrator (QPSRCA) revealed a LNHA job posting was done in January 2025 with one qualified applicant. The file included that the Board of Trustees Human Resources Subcommittee had the LNHA opening topic on their agenda for 01/13/25, 02/10/26,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-06-06 · tag F0844 — widespread
    Follow rules about disclosure of ownership requirements and tell the state agency about changes in ownership and/or administrative personnel.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to present a Disclosure of Ownership during the extended survey. This failure could affect the accuracy of records for Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and has the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility. Findings include:On 06/04/26 at 10:18 AM, the Disclosure of Ownership document was requested from the Administrative Officer (AO). During the exit conference on 06/06/26 at 6:00 PM, the AO stated the department that would complete and provide the Disclosure of Ownership document was closed and the document would be emailed on Monday. As of 06/10/26 at 5:30 AM the Disclosure of Ownership document has not been provided by the facility.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-09 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing data was maintained for a minimum of 18 months. Finding includes: During observations conducted on 08/05/24 through 08/09/24, it was observed that the daily staff posting was on a large dry erase board across from the nursing station. The board was large and included the census, staffing, and hours. During an interview on 08/09/24 at 08:19 AM with Staff Nurse 2 (SN) and the Director of Nursing (DON), the DON stated that the board is updated daily with the census and staffing. SN2 stated that if there is a change during the day, the board is also updated to make sure it has the most accurate information. When asked if the facility could provide evidence of staff posting data for the last 18 months, the DON stated they only put it on the board and do not keep a hard copy. SN2 and the DON stated that from the last survey, they were not made aware that staff posting data needed to be kept a minimum of 18 months.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-08-09 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview with the Administrator, review of the Guam Code Annotated (GCA) Title 10 - Chapter 15 Health and Safety, and the Skilled Nursing Unit (SNU) job requirements for administrator, the Governing body did not assure a licensed Administrator managed operations of the SNU. Findings include: During an entrance conference conducted on 08/05/24 at 09:09 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) and Medical Director both confirmed that the DON, a Registered Nurse, was the Administrator. During another interview conducted on 08/008/24 at 10:29 AM, the DON stated they had taken over in April of 2024 when the Medical Director/Administrator retired. The DON stated they did not have an Administrator License and did not plan on obtaining one. During an interview on 08/09/24 at 01:21 PM with the Hospital Chief Executive Officer (CEO), she stated that they have been actively recruiting for an administrator with a license but given the location of the SNU, it had been difficult. The CEO stated they had someone scheduled to start but backout of the deal at the last minute. The CEO acknowledged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to include review and update their Infection Prevention & Control-Infection Surveillance Criteria policy annually. This deficient practice encourages the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the infection control policies and procedures for the facility revealed the following policies and last reviewed/revised dates: -Administering Pneumococcal vaccines last reviewed/revised 04/14/223 -Administering Influenza Vaccines last reviewed/revised 04/14/23 -Protocol for Provision of COVID-19 Vaccination for SNF Residents last reviewed/revised 02/22 -Antibiotic Stewardship Program last reviewed/revised 10/25/19 -Methods of Surveillance last reviewed/revised 04/14/23 -Transmission Based Precautions (TBPS) for Residents with Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19 last reviewed/revised 03/22 During an interview on 08/08/24 at 09:32 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$13,247 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $13,247 — penalty dated 2025-08-22
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-11-22 for 61 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
GUAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 10/01/1983
HECHANOVA, YUKARIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/06/2025
LIZAMA, FLORENCIOIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
PEREZ-POSADAS, LILLIANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in GU

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Guam Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Guam
$9,581/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)*
$10,798/mo
Nursing home (private)*
$6,200/mo
Assisted living*

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner. The starred figure is the national median (no state figure published).

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 655000. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-06-06, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next