Hale Ola Kino By Arcadia

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 125 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.64 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 32 beds and averages 30.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.54 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.41 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.85 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.83 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 13% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity by protecting and promoting the rights of one of one resident (Resident (R) 4) reviewed for resident rights. R4's personal property was taken from his room without his knowledge or proper communication. This deficient practice has the potential to affect R4's dignified existence. Findings include: On 02/19/25 at 12:55 PM, an interview and observation of R4 was done. R4 was lying down in his room on his bed and complained that a friend brought him a bottle of TUMS yesterday morning and he does not know what happened to them. R4 reported he wanted TUMS and even asked the facility to get him a bottle, but no one helped him get it, so he asked his friend who was able to get him some and had put it in his drawer. R4 raised his voice and loudly stated .they took it from me. I don't know what happened .it's my personal property! I got it, someone brought it for me, and it disappeared. Nobody can find it! Should I call the police? It disappeared; they use it for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for two of 15 residents (Resident (R) 4 and R21) care plan reviewed. The facility did not develop a dietary care plan for R4 and did not implement R21's care plan for edema. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect R4 and R21's health and well-being. Findings include: R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of, but not limited to, unspecified severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of R4's weight since admission found on 01/14/25, the resident weighed 175.6 pounds (lbs.) and on 02/11/25, a month later, he weighed 166.2lbs. which is a 5.35% weight loss. Review of the initial interdisciplinary team (IDT) care plan meeting notes, dietary services documented PO [by mouth] intake has been poor, eating 25% or less at meals. No c/o [complaints of] food or menu. Likes ice cream and crispy bacon, however, currently on a minced diet. Wt [weight] 165.1#…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident (R) 3) sampled for limited range of motion received appropriate treatment for left foot contracture. This deficient practice put R3 at risk of further decrease in range of motion. Findings include: R3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, hemarthrosis to right knee, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominate side, cognitive communication deficit, vitamin D deficiency, and osteoarthritis. Review of R3's care plan documented R3 has limited physical mobility related to contractures to left foot. Interventions included Splint as ordered. Review of R3's physician orders for splint one time a day for left foot contracture Apply left foot splint on 4 hours/day; ON at 1200 and OFF at 1600 as tolerated and remove per schedule. On 02/18/25 at 12:37 PM, observed splint for left foot on the chair in R3's room, not being used. At 02:26 PM, R3…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 84) sampled for pain management was consistent with professional standards of practice. R84's pain management was ineffective and not followed up on which has the potential result of discomfort and continued pain. Findings include: R84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, insomnia, encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, and chronic pain syndrome. On 02/19/24 at 08:59 AM interviewed R84 in his room. R84 reported he has constant pain and discomfort on his left shoulder. He requests for oxycodone about every four hours, and it helps the pain go from a 9 to a 7 in the pain index scale (a 0-10 scale where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst possible pain). Nursing staff check on him and ask if the medication is effective and he informs them he is at a pain level of 7. Inquired if nursing staff follow up with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-21 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident menus were followed for one of one resident (Resident (R)10) sampled for food and two of 10 residents (R135 and R28) food trays and menus sampled in the kitchenette during food tray line. This deficient practice has the potential to put R10 and R135 at risk of not maintaining their weight and R28 at risk of low sodium with history of hospitalization. Findings include: On 02/18/25 at 12:31 PM, an observation of R10 and interview with resident representative (RR) 1 was done. R10 was observed to eat lunch (fresh cantaloup, fish, steamed cauliflower, and mashed potatoes with gravy) with assistance from RR1. RR1 reported R10 is supposed to get half the amount of starch on her plate but depending on who plates the food R10 will get the full amount. RR1 stated today the mashed potato was not half the amount but the full amount. RR1 pointed to the mashed potatoes on her plate and the menu which indicated the mashed potatoes were supposed to be half the amount. On 02/20/25 at 08:09 AM, observed R10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure opened food was discarded by the use by date for one of five food items sampled in the walk-in refrigerator. Failure to appropriately label stored food has the potential to affect residents that receive food from the kitchen, and visitors and staff who have meals served by the facility, placing them at risk for serious complications from foodborne illness. Findings include: During the initial tour of the main kitchen at 02/18/25 at 08:03 AM observed contracted facility [NAME] (C) 1 in the walk-in refrigerator gathering food items. C1 stated she is the designated cook for the facility and was gathering food items to make a salad from the top two shelves on the back left of the refrigerator with a little sign HCC. C1 confirmed those two shelves are food items for the facility, as well as a rolling food tray rack to the right. As C1 exited the walk-in refrigerator, this surveyor (Surveyor (S) 1) and S2 found a small metal container of food, covered with saran wrap, labeled Olive HCC S1 and S2 observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency in safe transfers and perineal care (peri care) for two residents in the sample (Residents 131 and 13). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for avoidable injuries and decreased quality of care, and has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility requiring assistance with transfers and/or peri care. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F689 Accident Hazards. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were trained for safe transfers as evidenced by an unsafe transfer of Resident (R)131 placing him at risk for avoidable injuries. 2) On 03/04/24 at 03:21 PM, observations were done of Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)11 performing perineal care (peri care) on Resident (R)13 after a bowel movement in her adult incontinence brief. After donning a pair of gloves, CNA11 prepared to clean R13 with two dry 4x4 disposable cloths and one 4x4 disposable cloth moistened with water. As he wiped her gluteal fold, CNA11 was observed having…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-07 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a food and hydration program that recognizes and addresses the preferences of each resident. This is evidenced by a failure to provide fresh water throughout the day, despite repeated requests, to one resident (Resident 132), and a failure to offer and provide an alternate menu item when residents found their meal tray unappetizing. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 03/04/24 at 09:56 AM, a concurrent observation and interview was done with Resident (R)132 at her bedside. R132 eating her breakfast, stated that last week when she went to the bathroom her urine was very dark like that [pointing to color of the brown bedside table] and burned. When she reported it, she was told she needed to drink more water. Water pitcher on the bedside table noted to be completely empty. At 11:36 AM, observation made that R132's water pitcher still completely empty. R132 stated that she did ask for water several times and was told by multiple…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards. The walk-in refrigerator contained boxes of food sitting on the floor. The deficient practice has the potential to affect many residents living in the facility who eat foods prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During a return visit to the kitchen on 03/06/24 at 12:04 PM, observation in the walk-in refrigerator/ freezer on B1 floor noted several cardboard boxes of food resting on metal trays on the floor in the walk-in refrigerator. Verified with the Dietary supervisor (DS) that the boxes of food are required to be stored off the floor. Verified that the food inside the walk-in fridge is for the residents who dine in the facility (since the main kitchen provides food for the assisted living facility within the building. The DS notified another kitchen staff in the area to move the food off of the floor. The DS also notified the Kitchen manager. Interview with the head chef (HC) from the kitchen on 03/07/24 at 1:55 PM. The surveyor shared survey findings and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, although informed of concerns regarding an unsafe transfer and poor positioning in bed, the facility failed to identify and document the verbalized complaint as such, and failed to provide a prompt resolution of the complaint/grievance for one resident (Resident 131) and his family representative(s). As a result of this deficient practice, the resident experienced a decreased quality of life, feeling as if the concerns he and his family representatives voiced were not being taken seriously, or acknowledged. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility who voice a concern. Findings include: Resident (R)131 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, but are not limited to, unspecified convulsions, left hemiplegia [paralysis on one side of the body] and left hemiparesis [one-sided muscle weakness] following a stroke, and constipation. On 03/04/24 03:37 PM an interview was done…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 23 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI