Arcadia Retirement Residence
1434 Punahou Street, Honolulu, HI 96822 · Non profit - Corporation · 91 certified beds · (808) 941-0941 Medicare only — no Medicaid
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (25% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $12,854 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-03)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.1% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 1.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 1.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.7% | 20.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 0.8% | 9.1% | 18.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.0% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.7% | 17.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.5% | 11.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.9% | 84.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.0% | 19.4% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.5% | 10.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.20 | 1.09 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.65 | 0.88 | 1.80 | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 26.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 21% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.1%CMS range 39.3–64.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.1%CMS range 6.5–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 26.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 35.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 20.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 3.5–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.30 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 85.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.73 to 1.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 25% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2022-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff members, the facility failed to 1) Ensure appropriate alert mechanisms on exit doors were functional on the nursing units after one resident (R)52, was able to elope from the facility. This deficient practice could have potentially placed any residents who wander in immediate danger and 2) Failed to implement interventions, including adequate supervision to prevent an avoidable fall for 1 out of 2 residents Resident (R)47 sampled for falls. As a result, R47 sustained a fracture to left ribs. Findings Include: 1) On 12/19/22 at 10:33 AM, observed R52 walking out of his room. R52 was observed to be walking up and down the hallway with a steady gait before lunchtime. On 12/20/22 at 09:57 AM, R52 ' s family member (FM) was interviewed via phone. FM stated that R52 has had elopement issues since residing in the independent living area. On 12/20/22 at 10:15 AM, reviewed R52 ' s electronic health record (EHR). R52 ' s Minimum Data Set (MDS) annual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-11-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to the resident according to the resident's goals and preferences. R7 reported lumbar pain which impeded the resident from using the Hoyer lift to get out of bed for showers and/or socializing with staff and/or other residents. R7 reported receiving Lidocaine patches and Tylenol as the current plan for pain management, however, the medications are ineffective. R7 reported increased feeling of depression and being worn down by constant, unrelieved pain, and the inability to get out of bed. R7 goal and preferences for pain management is to be able to use the Hoyer lift, increased sleep, and minimal severe pain. The resident confirmed a strong medication option was not discussed or offered and she does want the option of receiving a stronger medication despite the potential for sedative side effects. As a result of this deficient practice, R7 has experienced physical and psychosocial harm related to ineffective pain management. Finding includes: During an interview with R7 on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's privacy and dignity were maintained for one of two residents. The deficient practice compromised Resident (R) 36's privacy and dignity.Findings Include:Review of the facility reported incident (Intake #2636069) received on 10/04/25, documented that a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) reported a video was taken on 09/30/25 during evening shift using the facility's cell phone. The video depicted R36 during peri-care with a heavily soiled incontinence brief.R36 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, dysphagia, obstructive sleep apnea, hemiplegia/hemiparesis due to cerebral infarction, Diabetes type 2, mild cognitive impairment, and epilepsy.Review of R36's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/07/25, documented in Section H (Bladder and Bowel) that R36 is always incontinent of urine. In Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) documented R36 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility did not follow proper sanitation practices in the kitchen. As a result of this deficiency, there was an increase risk for foodborne illness and an increase risk for hazards such as a fire. Findings include: 1)During observation of the kitchen on 10/01/24 at 08:00 AM, the area between the stoves appeared dirty and not cleaned. The area had crumpled paper, dirty plastic bags, dirty napkins, and dirty paper bowls. Staff interview, on 10/01/24 at 08:05 AM, Kitchen Supervisor (KSupvr) acknowledged that the area previously mentioned was dirty and not cleaned. KSupvr said they will have the area cleaned and addressed for future cleaning services. 2)Observation was conducted on 10/03/24 at 07:52 AM in one of the unit kitchens. A metal pan was observed filled with condiments and sauces. The metal pan contained a large container of creamy peanut butter labeled, Best if Used by August 31, 2024. The pan also contained yellow mustard labeled, Best by date of July 16, 2024. Interview was conducted with the night shift Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-04 · tag F0552 — patternEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide information of the risks and benefits of using psychotropic medications to three out of five sampled residents (Resident (R) 29, R63, and R46). This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect the residents wellbeing and has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility on psychotropic medications. Findings Include: 1) R29 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R29 has a medical history that includes, but not limited to, dementia with psychotic disturbance, Parkinson's disease, and generalized anxiety disorder. On 10/03/24, a review of R29's Electronic Health Record (EHR) noted that R29 had a medication order for antidepressant since 05/30/24. There was no documentation found in R29's EHR that noted a facility consent form was provided to R29 or R29's representative that went over the risks and benefits of using the antidepressant medication. Interview was conducted with the Administrator on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of policy on Advance Health Care Directives (AHCD), the facility failed to ensure that the code status was consistent with the AHCD for one Resident (R)51 of two residents sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, there was the potential for R51 to receive unnecessary Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Findings include: Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR), on [DATE], showed R51 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including Supranuclear Opthalmoplegia (unable to move eyes at will in all directions), Chronic Kidney Disease, Alzheimer's, Dementia, and High Cholesterol. A doctor's order, dated [DATE] read Full Code, Active which was not what R51 wanted according to the AHCD. Review of R51's AHCD instructions for health care, on [DATE] at 10:10 AM, showed the following choice; to not prolong life if the following is present: an incurable and irreversible condition that will result in my death within a relatively short time, I become unconscious…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise one of 18 sampled residents (Resident (R) 63) care plan after she sustained two falls. This deficient practice places R63 at risk for future falls and may affect all the residents in the facility who have fallen. Findings Include: A review of R63's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted on 10/02/24. R63's EHR noted that she had a fall on 07/26/24 and 09/03/24. A review of R63's care plan did not contain new interventions that were implemented after her fall on 07/26/24 and 09/03/24. Interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/04/24 at 08:23 AM in his office. DON reviewed R63's care plan and confirmed that new interventions should have been placed in the care plan after R63's two falls. A review of the facility policy titled, Falls, dated 02/08/24 was conducted on 10/03/24. The policy noted, The IDT [Interdisciplinary Team] will meet the next business day to review falls, do a root cause analysis, follow-up actions with further recommendations when indicated and update care plan. A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-04 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to correctly identify on Resident (R)13's Care Plan (CP) that she would be residing with her husband in a shared room. The deficient practice could affect all residents in the facility who are residing in a shared room with their husband or wife if they are not correctly identified as so. Findings Include: On 10/01/24 at 11:14 AM observed R46 sleeping in his bed and observed R13 resting in her bed in the shared room, each on their own side of the room. On 10/02/24 at 11:25 AM while observing lunch delivery to resident rooms observed R46 in his bed resting and R13 in her bed resting in their shared room. During record review on 10/04/24 found R13 had a CP with a Psychosocial Management/ Well-being problem with the following Resident is pleasant and easy to engage into conversation. Resident may not initiate conversations and seems to be more on the quiet side. Resident husband has also moved into HCC but per resident and family request, they will not be moved in to a shared room together. On 10/04/24 at 02:33 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to secure an electrical panel on the third-floor nursing unit. As a result of this deficiency, the facility put the safety and well-being of the residents as well as the public at risk for accident hazards. Findings include: During an observation of the third-floor nursing unit on 10/02/24 at 09:20 AM, one electrical panel was not secured. The padlock was not latched on and there was no staff in the immediate vicinity to prevent any residents and/or visitors from accessing the panel. Staff interview on 10/02/24 at 09:30 AM, Maint Staff 2 acknowledged that the electrical panel is supposed to be secured and the door should have been locked. Review of policy on Control of Hazardous Energy (Lockout/Tagout) read the following: Policy, company adheres to a strict Control of Hazardous Energy Policy (Lock-Out/Tag-Out). Purpose, to ensure the health and safety of staff and residents in compliance with State and Federal Laws and regulations . Definitions, lockout is the physical placement of a lock on an energy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document and medical record review (RR), the facility failed to honor the rights of one Resident (R)1 of a sample size of three. Although R1 and a Family Member (FM)1 verbalized to nursing staff they did not want melatonin (sleep aid) administered, the staff did not honor that request, or follow up with the provider to discontinue the medication in a timely manner. As a result of this deficient practice, R1 continued to receive the melatonin, and R1 and FM1 were not included in the treatment plan after expressing concern. This could affect any resident and has the potential to be a barrier for them to obtain their highest level of psychological well being. Findings include: 1) R1 was an [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation after small bowel resection. She had an abdominal post-op wound with secondary diagnosis that included coronary artery disease, hypertension, acute hypoxic respiratory failure, and dementia. Her records indicated she had late onset…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document and record review, the facility grievance policy did not include the necessary requirements of 1) how to file a grievance anonymously, 2) identify and communicate who the grievance official was or how to contact, 3) did not determine a reasonable timeframe that complainant could expect a completed review of the grievance, 4) that they have the right to obtain the review in writing, or 5) ensure written grievance decisions meet documentation requirements. In addition, the facility failed to identify a concern verbalized by one Resident's (R)1 Family Member (FM)1, as a grievance, did not investigate the concern timely or keep FM1 apprised of the resolution. As a result of this deficiency, FM1 did not get the results of the investigation regarding all concerns. Without an efficient process to address grievances, anyone that has a concerns, may not have their issue addressed in a timely manner. Findings include: 1) R1 was an [AGE] year old female, who had two admissions to the facility.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-06 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and document review, the facility failed to report an alleged abuse to proper authorities within prescribed timeframe's. Specifically, the facility staff became aware of an alleged abuse on 07/31/2024 and did not report it to Adult Protective Services (APS) until 08/05/2024. In addition, the facility did not report the incident to the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) until 08/12/2024. Findings include: 1) The Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received a report from an outside agency (APS (Adult Protective Services)) regarding an alleged sexual abuse complaint on 08/09/2024. The report included, but not limited to: On 7/31/24 AV (alleged victim/R1) reported to a Certified Nursing Assistant (name unknown) that during the night (either on 7/30/24 or 7/31/24, AP (alleged perpetrator) came to AV's room and grabbed AV's hand then forced her to touch his penis. OCHA received a Facility Reported Incident (ACTs #11142) completed by the facility on 08/12/2024. The report was a combined initial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 25 citations
- Potential for harm · D2024-09-06 · tag F0777 — isolatedProvide or obtain x-rays/tests when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document review and medical record review (RR), the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of significant radiology findings. One Resident's (R)2 repeat chest xray findings showed significant changes from the previous xray taken three days earlier, and were not communicated to the physician for approximately one hour after the radiologist recorded the interpretation. In addition, the facility does not have a policy/procedure or effective process in place to identify which imaging results should be called to provider. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents and may result in adverse outcomes. Findings include: 1) R2 was a [AGE] year old male with past pertinent medical history of hypertension, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's, Arteriosclerotic heart disease, diabetes, urinary retention, unsteady on feet and muscle weakness. He had advanced functional and activity of daily living dependence with on an off confusion. R2 had a fall on [DATE] while at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2) While conducting an interview with Resident (R)29 on 10/31/23 at 11:05 PM, the resident reported staff being very loud and waking up the resident, daily, when they come into the room at 04:30 AM to assist the resident's roommate to the bathroom. R29 confirmed she wants to sleep in and does not want to be awaken by staff at that hour. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and an Advising DON (AADON) on 11/03/23 at 10:19 AM, the DON confirmed staff should minimize the sound level to avoid disturbing resident's sleep. Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe, homelike environment as evidenced by two different areas of the building being in disrepair and staff not maintaining comfortable sound levels. Findings include: 1) Observation on 11/02/23 at 01:00 PM of the third floor Diamond Head Nursing Unit revealed two different areas of the building where there was broken corner protectors, cracked drywall and unfinished wall repair. This also created a risk for accident hazards. During staff interview on 11/03/23 at 07:40 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to a dignified existence for two residents sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: On 11/02/23 at 09:57 AM, observed Activity Staff (AS)4 standing next to Resident (R)25 looking out the window, in the activity room/dining room looking out the window. Observed R25 tap AS4's arm with the back of her right hand. AS4 responded to the incident by quickly hitting away the resident's hand and immediately moving away from the resident. AS4 initially appeared annoyed by R25 touching him/her and rubbed the area if his/her arm that R25 touched. At 10:12 AM, while conducting activities, another resident stood up from the chair, observed AS4 walk behind the resident, put both hands on her shoulders and applied some force to the resident's shoulders, prompting the resident to sit back into the chair, twice. The third time the resident stood from the chair, AS4 placed his/her right hands on the resident's left shoulder while standing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident representative's right to make decisions on behalf of the resident for one resident (Resident (R)70) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, there is a potential risk of more than minimal harm. Findings include: R70 is an [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis which include but are not limited to peripheral vascular disease, Dementia, diabetes mellitus type 2. Review R70's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/24/23, documented in Section C. Cognitive Patterns a score of 9 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating the resident has moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the resident's documents and consent forms documented R70 has a Power of Attorney (POA) for health care decision and the POA is actively involved in exercising his/her right to make decisions on behalf of R70. Review of six consent forms in R70 Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of resident's needs to one out of 21 sampled residents (Resident (R) 21). This failed practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: R21 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R21 is currently receiving hospice care in the facility. Concurrent observation and Interview were conducted on 11/01/23 at 10:17 AM in R21's room. R21 stated that he is constantly requesting for more water, and it takes telling two or three staff until someone finally provides him with more. The resident has two small cups on his bedside table. One cup was filled halfway with water and the other cup was filled with clear light brown liquid. Resident's water pitcher was located on top of the bedside dresser, which is located behind the resident. Due to the location, the resident is unable to reach the water pitcher. Observation was conducted on 11/01/23 at 12:10 PM in R21's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician after a resident fell and had the potential for requiring physician interventions for one resident (Resident (R)70) sampled. R70 fell and sustained multiple bruises and reported hitting her head, was on medications which inhibit the resident's blood clotting abilities (Aspirin and Xarelto) placing the resident at higher risk for internal bleeding, and the physician was not notified until 1 hour and 40-minutes after the resident fell. Facility staff reported R70's physician is regularly difficult to contact. As a result of this deficient practice, all residents under the same care of R70's primary physician is at risk for potential of harm. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 01:05 PM, conducted a review of R70's Electronic Health Record (EHR). Review of the resident's progress notes documented on 10/08/23 at 08:20 AM, R70 had a witnessed, unassisted fall in the dining room and sustained bruising to the right forearm, abdomen, left breast, and a lump of the forehead. R70 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to assure that two sampled residents (Resident (R)72 and R70 ) received an accurate assessment, reflective of the residents' status at the time of the assessment. This deficient practice places all the facility residents at risk for assessment inaccuracy. Findings Include: 1) A review was conducted of R72's Electronic Health Record (EHR). R72's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/28/23 indicated that R72 had three stage two pressure ulcers that were not present upon admission. Interview was conducted on 11/02/23 at 08:09 AM with R72 in the dining room. R72 stated that he had the pressure ulcer before admission to the facility. Interview was conducted with Director of Nursing (DON) on 11/03/23 at 10:26 AM. DON stated that R72's pressure ulcers were present during admission and was miscoded on the MDS. 2) Review of R70's quarterly MDS with an ARD of 10/18/23, Section C. Cognitive Patterns documented the resident's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scored was documented as 15, indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-03 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to include R12's choices for her advanced healthcare directives in her baseline care plan. The deficient practice could affect any newly admitted resident at the facility. Findings Include: On 11/02/2023 at 01:21 PM RR did not find a signed Baseline Care Plan form for R12. On 11/02/2023 at 04:33 PM medical records was able to provide a copy of the baseline care plan for R12. Baseline care plan was signed by staff completing the baseline care plan on 09/29/2023 for R12 who was admitted that day. Noted the Advanced Directives/Code Status section was left blank. On 11/03/2023 at 11:41 AM reviewed R12's baseline care plan with Interim DON who stated the Advanced Directives/Code Status section is to be filled out, this area was left blank. Requested and received a copy of the Baseline Care Plan policy, from the Interim DON, which is dated from 05/2022. Policy states: Purpose: The facility must develop a baseline care plan for each resident that includes the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review (RR) and resident interview the facility failed to include use of a walker in Resident (R)35's comprehensive care plan and use of antidepressant in R12's comprehensive care plan. The deficient practice could affect any resident at the facility. Findings Include: 1. On 10/31/2023 at 09:29 AM met and spoke with R35 in her room. R35 asked surveyor if I saw her walker on the other side and she pointed towards the partition in her room. Looked on other side of partition but saw a walker that was in the living space of R35's roommate. R35 stated a facility staff, nurse, had told her she could not use her walker. Inquired if R35 had fallen and she denied falling in the facility. R35 stated she walked in the hallway yesterday with the therapist and she took the walker away. On 10/31/2023 at 10:00 AM spoke with R35's nurse and asked if she told resident she could not have her walker and nurse denied this. On 11/02/2023 at 09:14 AM went to interview R35 and found her sitting in her room with her walker next to her. R35 said she saw it on the other side near…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to revise Resident (R)70's comprehensive care plan (CCP). R70 fell on [DATE] and sustained bruising to the right forearm, abdomen, left breast, and a lump on the forehead and is on daily scheduled medications which increases the resident's risk for bleeding and bruising. The resident's fall care plan was not revised after the fall and injuries sustained on 10/08/23 to include the risk for increased injury or additional monitoring related to the medication. As a result of this deficient practice, residents on anticoagulant/antiplatelet medication increases the severity of injury residents could sustain during a fall. Findings include: On 10/31/23 at 10:30 AM, initial observation of the resident documented the resident had bruising on the bridge of the nose. Inquired with nursing staff about the bruise on the resident's nose, staff stated they are unsure of how the resident got the bruise. On 10/31/23 at 01:05 PM, conducted a review of R70's Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to assure a medication cart was locked when not being used by a nurse. The deficient practice could affect all residents, staff and visitors who could have access to the unlocked medication cart. Findings Include: On 11/02/2023 at 02:17 PM while standing in the hallway near the nurse's station on the second floor noticed a registered nurse (RN)5 walk away from the medication cart which she left unlocked. Surveyor remained with medication cart till RN5 returned. During this time the Interim DON came by and was shown the medication cart was left unlocked and unattended. On 11/02/2023 at 02:24 PM RN5 returned to unlocked medication cart. RN5 confirmed the med cart is supposed to be locked when it is left unattended. Inquired with RN5 if she had training regarding this matter when she attended orientation and she stated she had orientation and the locked cart is a known thing. RN5 denied getting separate training on this.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to maintain an accurate medical record for R59 putting her at risk for a fall from a bed that was care planned to Do not not leave bed on lowest position. This deficient practice could affect all residents at the facility who have an impaired mobility. Findings Include: 1. During RR of R59's care plan noted under Impaired Mobility/Falls an intervention listed stated Maintain fall precautions. Adjust height of bed to comfortable height for easy in/out of bed. Do not leave bed on lowest position. On 11/02/2023 at 02:01 PM met with Interim DON and looked at R59's bed. R59 was sleeping in her bed and facility staff showed the bed was at it's lowest position. R59's bed was a regular hospital bed and not a low to the ground bed. Interim DON stated it appears to be an error in the care plan, regarding the height of the bed.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure proper glove use procedures were followed by a staff member. This deficient practice places the residents at risk for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Findings Include: Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 11/02/23 at 02:05 PM. Housekeeper (HK) 1 was observed entering the second floor through the stairwell access with gloves on. HK1 then entered the laundry room and immediately exited. Infection Control Coordinator (ICC) was present in the laundry room. When ICC was queried about HK1's glove use, ICC stated that HK1 should not have gloves on in the hallway.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of the facility's policy and procedures, and interview with staff member, the facility failed to ensure that all foods were procured, stored, prepared, distributed, and served under sanitary conditions. Observations of a refrigerator found temperatures greater than 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F); and stored food items were not covered. Findings Include: During the initial kitchen tour observation with Head [NAME] on 12/19/22 at 08:15 AM, observed trays of raw chicken located in the walk in refrigerator on a tray cart uncovered. The plastic that was on top of the tray cart was not completely over the cart. Head [NAME] acknowledged it should be covered. Further concurrent observation with Head [NAME] during the initial kitchen tour on 12/19/22 at 08:21 AM, a refrigerator inside thermometer measured 46 degrees F and the exterior thermometer measured 51 degrees F. Interview with Head [NAME] confirmed the measurement and stated the refrigerator should be no higher than 41 degrees F. Second observation at 08:43 AM, found the inside thermometer measured at 46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2022-12-22 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview with staff member, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was maintained in safe operating condition. The facility did not ensure proper temperatures of the dishwasher was achieved. Findings Include: During the initial kitchen tour with Head [NAME] on 12/19/22 at 08:15 AM, Head [NAME] stated the facility's dishwasher used heat to sanitize the dishes and the final rinse thermometer should reach 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F). Observed a dish test tray going through the dishwasher. Observed the final rinse thermometer not reaching appropriate temperature. The thermometer for the rinse function did not reach 180 degrees F minimum as instructed on the dishwasher. Kitchen Aide (KA) 2 confirmed the rinse function did not reach 180 degrees F. A second observation of a test tray was done and the dishwasher final rinse thermometer reached 180 degrees F. Inquired with Head [NAME] how the facility ensured the thermometer was functioning properly, Head [NAME] stated they use test strips and the test strip would turn black to indicate the dishes were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to appropriately manage inappropriate temperatures for two of its two medication refrigerators. This deficient practice has the potential to risk spoilage of necessary medications for residents, such as insulin and vaccines, and could result in serious and harmful outcomes. Findings include: On 12/21/22 at 08:41 AM, a medication refrigerator was observed in a nursing unit. Insulin, suppositories, and eye drops were kept in this refrigerator. An ACTION LOG FOR REFRIGERATOR AND FREEZER document was located on the refrigerator. There were two temperature ranges on the document, one read: STANDARD RANGES: Refrigerator: (33) - (41) degrees F [Fahrenheit] Freezer: (-25) - (10) degrees F. Another temperature range was handwritten and stated, [nursing unit] MED-ROOM REFRIGERATOR TEMP 36 - 46°F. Documented on the log for 12/04/22 at 01:30 AM, the temperature reading was 46.7° in the column next to the temperature, the heading stated, Out of Range reading: Inspect refrigerator/Provide Action Taken (i.e. Close door,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility did not assure Resident (R) 26's advance health care directive (AHCD) was documented and filed in the resident's medical record. The facility failed to ensure R26 was periodically given opportunities to formulate an AHCD. This deficient practice has the potential to cause harm to residents when they are provided medical care that is not in accordance with their wishes. Findings Include: R26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review found a checklist documenting R26 formulated an AHCD but no AHCD was found on file in the resident's medical record. On 12/20/22 at 10:35 AM interview with Social Worker (SW) was done. SW confirmed the facility does not have R26's AHCD on file. SW stated R26's family members reported R26 has an AHCD but has not provided a copy to the facility. Inquired if SW has documentation of periodic follow-ups with resident and/or family members to ensure R26 exercises his right to formulate an AHCD or request a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, record review and review of policy, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean environment for one Resident (R)32 of eight residents sampled. As a result of this failure, R32 had a prolonged exposure to mold and was put at risk for developing adverse reactions. Findings include: During an observation of R32 ' s room on 12/20/22 @ 11:30 AM, a small section of the ceiling, approximately 1foot x 1foot, was noted to have brown &/or black irregularly shaped stains and appeared moist and mold like. Maintenance Supervisor (Maint) was queried on 12/20/22 @ 11:45 AM and said there was a water leak and that a remediation company did testing and was scheduled to do clean-up/ repairs. Review of the remediation company ' s test results dated 11/3/22 read the following: This is regarding the mold and asbestos sampling and analysis, conducted on 10/24/22 . The purpose of this project was to collect and analyze air samples for mold and certain suspect asbestos containing building materials . Mold, the tape lift sample . The laboratory results indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff members, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 47 was free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms, as evidenced by R47's posey belt, used for safety, placed behind her where she is unable to reach and remove herself. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility from ensuring they are free from physical restraints not required to treat medical symptoms. Findings Include: R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to age-related osteoporosis, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, depression, history of falling, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and dementia. Review of R47's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 11/22/22, R47's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) scored her at a 3 (severe cognitive impact). In Section P0100. Physical Restraints used in chair or out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility failed to immediately report an injury of unknown source to the adult protective services (APS) in accordance with State Law for Resident (R) 44 after fracture results of R44's right foot. Findings Include: R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to dementia, Parkinson's disease, rheumatoid arthritis, and age-related osteoporosis. Review of R44's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 10/04/22, R44's Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) scored him at a 3 (severe cognitive impact). In Section G. Functional Status, under Transfers (how resident moves between surface including to and from bed, chair, wheelchair, standing position), R44 requires extensive assistance with two-person physical assist. Review of R44's Electronic Health Record (EHR) clinical notes documented on 11/24/22 0110 staff reported swelling and discoloration to R [right] foot prior to changing resident. Assessed,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident's (R) comprehensive care plan goals were communicated to the receiving health care provider to ensure a safe and effective transition of care. R22 needed to be transferred to a hospital for higher level of care and could potentially be sub optimally cared for because her individualized care plan and goals were not communicated to the receiving facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: On 12/19/22 at 10:30 AM, on initial screening of residents, Registered Nurse (RN)9 stated that R22 was sent to the hospital that morning due to the need for higher level of care. On 12/20/22 at 11:58 AM, a record review of R22's electronic health record (EHR) was done. According to the progress notes, R22 needed a higher level of care to treat possible gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and was sent to the hospital. No other documentation about her transfer was found in the EHR. On 12/21/22 at 12:13 PM, Quality Assurance Nurse (QAN)11 was interviewed. QAN11 was asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility did not provide written information about their bed hold policy to one resident (R), R22, who needed a higher level of care and was transferred to a hospital. The facility does not have a current bed-hold policy for residents who are hospitalized which leaves the resident with no possible bed to return to when their acute medical condition has resolved. This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 12/19/22 at 10:30 AM, on initial screening of residents, Registered Nurse (RN)9 stated that R22 was sent to the hospital that morning. On 12/20/22 at 11:58 AM, a record review of R22's electronic health record (EHR) was done. According to the progress notes, R22 needed a higher level of care to treat possible gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and was sent to the hospital. No other transfer documentation was found in the EHR. On 12/21/22 at 12:13 PM, the Quality Assurance Nurse (QAN)11 was interviewed. QAN11 stated that she was not sure if the facility gave out written information about their bed hold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview with staff members, the facility failed to implement one of 18 sampled residents Resident (R) 47 person-centered comprehensive care plan. An intervention to prevent injury for R47 with a history of falls was not implemented. Findings Include: R47 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses not limited to age-related osteoporosis, anemia, cognitive communication deficit, depression, history of falling, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and dementia. While admitted to the facility R47 had a total of four falls, on 06/25/22, 07/10/22, 08/04/22 and 11/01/22. Review of R47's clinical notes documents R47 had an unwitnessed fall in her room on 11/01/22 and had a X-Ray to right elbow on 11/02/22 with impression of acute displaced fracture of the olecranon (a long bone in the forearm that projects behind the elbow). The clinical notes document on 11/01/22, Per CNA staff, residents .bed alarm triggered, she went to check and she found resident on the floor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-22 · tag F0732 — isolatedPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview the facility failed to update the nurse staffing data daily and at the beginning of each shift for one of four units. Findings Include: On 12/19/22 at 10:45 AM on the third floor, observed the daily nurse staffing data posted at the front of the nurse's station dated 12/19/22 with the total number of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff and hours worked for night shift. Day shift and evening shift were observed to be blank. On 12/19/22 at 11:00 AM concurrent observation and interview with Infection Preventionist (IP) and Registered Nurse (RN) 12 was done. IP confirmed the daily nurse staffing data for day shift was not filled out and day shift starts at 08:00 AM. RN12 stated day shift did not start until 10:00 AM today because she did not come in until 10:00 AM. IP and RN12 confirmed the time this observation and interview took place was 11:00 AM. RN12 took the posted nurse staffing data and began updating the day shift total working licensed and unlicensed staff and hours.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to adhere to COVID-19 infection control protocol by not appropriately disinfecting and changing personal protective equipment (PPE) after exiting from one resident's (R), R25's COVID-19 isolation room, out of a sample of one resident. This deficient practice encourages the transmission of the COVID-19 virus which has the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors in the facility. Findings include: On 12/19/22 at 08:27 AM, in an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON), R25 was identified as having an active COVID-19 infection and was currently in isolation. On 12/20/22 at 11:09 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)9 was observed to be entering and exiting R25's room that had Airborne Precautions, Contact Precautions, and Droplet Precautions signage posted on R25's room door. An additional sign posted on R25's closed door was, Discard N95 [respirator] and DISINFECT FACE SHIELD at every exit from the room. RN9 exited from R25's room and did not disinfect her face shield and change her N95 mask before going to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$12,854 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $12,854 — penalty dated 2023-11-03
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CENTRAL UNION CHURCH | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/1987 |
| BUNN, ANDREW | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| CHANG, CORLIS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| KOEHL, ALBERT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| MAGANA, RAOUL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| POPHAM, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| REICHHARDT, LAURA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| REINKER, KENT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SAYIN, LUCAS | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2020 |
| SINNADURAY, RUSHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| ZORN, MARTIN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2017 |
| LAI, VIVIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| SCHULBERG, SUZIE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2019 |
| ARCADIA ELDER SERVICES | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/22/2001 |
| MIYAZAKI, SHANNON | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/16/2023 |
| OKAMOTO, LAUREN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/01/2019 |
| PLISZKA, HEIDI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/04/2019 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $584K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in HI
CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page for homes that do.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125014. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-10-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.