No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hale Malamalama

6163 Summer Street, Honolulu, HI 96821 · For profit - Corporation · 40 certified beds · (808) 396-0537 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (808) 396-0537 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)3 actual-harm citations$87,032 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $87,032 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-31)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
6600 Kalanianaole Hwy, Ste 114A
Pharmacy
377 Keahole St #D11 · (808) 395-9491 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
333 Keahole St · (808) 396-6306 · Call to confirm hours
Park
96 Bay St · (808) 373-8013 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased28.6%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.2%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%1.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.2%20.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication22.0%9.1%18.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.1%17.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table23.7%11.9%17.1%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.881.091.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.000.881.80better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.05U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.03hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.05 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 72% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The data for this measure is missing or was not submitted. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.40
RN hours/ resident / day
0.06
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.71
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.18
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
51.2%
Total nursing turnover
30.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 40 beds and averages 34.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.18 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.35 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.63 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-09-27)
22
at the previous standard inspection (2023-09-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record and document review, the facility failed to protect one resident (R)1 of two investigated for staff abuse/neglect. Specifically, Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)2 was witnessed to make inappropriate, unsympathetic comments to R1, and willfully neglected to provide her the necessary services of toileting on more than one occasion. As a result of these willful acts, R1 suffered mental anguish and emotional harm. Findings include: 1) On 01/10/2025, the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received an anonymous report of potential abuse of R1 (alleged victim/AV) by facility staff. The narrative account included but not limited to: - R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing level of care after being hospitalized . - Presenting Problem: Allegations of physical abuse and psychological abuse of a [AGE] year old female short-term rehab (rehabilitation) resident by a male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) .and a female Certified Nursing Assistant. - On 01/07/2025, AV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care to residents in accordance with professional standards of practice. Resident (R)89 is allergic to iodine (disinfectant) and the facility did not identify and provide a substitute for iodine. The staff member used alcohol pads to cleanse the area before inserting a catheter. This deficient practice had the potential to cause burning of the skin or pain. Finding includes: R89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of rectal pain/anal fissure (tear in the thin, moist tissue that lines the anus) and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. Record review found a progress note dated, 09/15/23 at 01:37 AM. R89 was documented as unable to sleep, claimed she is unable to sit a long time because of rectal pain but complained of pain 'inside' not the vagina but hypogastric area and agreed to be assessed. The vaginal and rectal area no redness, rash, or hemorrhoid. Bladder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-09-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review (RR), interview with family and staff, the facility failed to ensure one of two residents sampled were free from accidents. Resident (R) 7 had two avoidable falls. The facility failed to perform a root cause analysis and based on identification of probably contributing factors, develop interventions to prevent falls. The facility also implemented interventions that were not included in the resident's care plan. Findings include: Cross Reference to F657. Care Plan Timing and Revision. On 09/12/23 at 10:47 AM while introducing self to R7, who was resting sitting upright in his bed, observed he had multiple bruises and swelling to his face. When asked how he got the bruises on his face he reported I fell. Resident raised his hands to touch his face and stated he had pain. When asked if he took pain medication he reported he does when they bring it to him, referring to the nurse. On 09/13/23 at 02:06 PM a telephone interview was conducted with R7's son-in-law and daughter who have Power of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report two of a sample size of two allegations of Resident (R)1 and R2 abuse/neglect as mandated to the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA). The Administrator (ADM)was not notified immediately of R1's allegation of mistreatment, and the facility failed to notify OHCA of results and actions taken. Findings include: 1) On 01/10/2025, the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received an anonymous report of potential abuse of R1 (alleged victim/AV) by a staff member of the facility. The narrative account included: - R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing level of care after being hospitalized . - Presenting Problem: Allegations of physical abuse and psychological abuse of a [AGE] year old female short-term rehab (rehabilitation) resident by a male Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) .and a female Certified Nursing Assistant. - On 01/07/2025, AV reported to .Social Worker (SW)1. that a male (alleged perpetrator/AP) and female AP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to provide evidence they conducted thorough investigations of two Resident (R)1 and R3 abuse/neglect allegations of a sample of two. In addition, the facility failed to remove the alleged perpetrators immediately when identified for R1's case. The facility also failed to internally investigate an Adult Protective Services (APS) case on R3 for neglect to provide needed services because they felt it was a resolved issue with staff assignments. Due to this deficiency, the underlying issue of providing timely services was not investigated to identify any quality issues or neglect. Findings included: 1) R1 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] for skilled nursing services. She had a history that included, but not limited to hypertension, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, malignant neoplasm of stomach, malignant ascites, Type 2 Diabetes, difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. On [DATE], R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to timely update one Resident's(R)1 care plan. R1 initially required one assist for toileting/transfers. When her condition declined, she required two person assist and then the Hoyer lift to safely transfer her, but the facility did not revise her CP in a timely manner. As a result of this deficiency, there was the potential not all staff were aware of what assistance R1 required to provide safe transfers, increasing the potential for falls with injury or harm. Findings include: R1 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] for skilled nursing services. She had a history that included, but not limited to hypertension, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, malignant neoplasm of stomach, malignant ascites, Type 2 Diabetes, difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. Reviewed the electronic medical record which included the following entries: 01/03/2025 at 02:44 PM, Nursing note: .Toileted by staff with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review (RR) and interviews, the facility failed to provide the needed incontinence care and standards of practice for two residents, (R)2 and R3, of a sample size of three that needed incontinence care. This deficient practice has the potential to affect any resident requiring incontinence care. Findings include: 1) R2 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She has a medical history that includes but not limited to dementia, retention of urine, muscle weakness, difficulty walking and syncope. She is chairfast and has very limited ability to change position without moderate to maximum assistance, and is considered high risk for developing pressure sores. Reviewed R2's Care plan (CP) which included the following: - Date initiated: [DATE]: The resident has bladder incontinence r/t (related to) Dementia, Impaired Mobility. - Interventions initiated [DATE] included Brief use: The resident uses disposable briefs. Check every 2 hours and prn (as needed) and change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-09-27 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to create an annual Performance Improvement Project (PIP) that focuses on high risk or problem prone areas identified through the data collection and analysis. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect all the residents' overall wellbeing. Findings Include: Interview and facility document review were concurrently conducted on 09/27/24 at 10:33 AM with the facility Administrator. The facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) binders did not contain documents on an annual Performance Improvement Project (PIP). Administrator confirmed that the committee met quarterly to discuss current facility issues and improvements but did not have an official PIP. A review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan for HALE MALAMALAMA, was conducted. The policy documented, In addition, the QAPI Committee will implement any PIP topics indicated by data analysis .PIPs are implemented in accordance with CMS' protocol for conducting PIPs .

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review. The facility failed to provide an orderly and comfortable home for the residents residing in the facility, due to the following: Resident care equipment that was not maintained was stored in one resident's room which gave it a disorderly and cluttered appearance. Staff working at night were noisy and disrupted the residents sleep. The temperature in the dining room/ activity room was too cold at night. The efforts of the resident council to address the concerns failed to resolve the problems that were ongoing. The deficient practice affects the rights of the residents to live in a homelike and comfortable environment. Findings include: 1)During an observation in Resident (R) 186 room on 09/25/24 at 08:13, an Oxygen (O2) concentrator was observed under the counter next to the right side of the bed and two (O2) tanks next to the bed. Verified with staff that R186 is not currently being treated with O2. One wheelchair, two footrests, and a cane were found on the floor at the head of the bed (behind the bed against the wall). During a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-27 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure housekeeping services were being provided to the residents in a manner that was safe. Housekeeping staff were cleaning the dining tables with chemicals that were toxic to the skin and eyes while residents were seated at the table. The deficient practices places the residents at risk for illness. Findings include: Observations made in the dining room on 09/25/24 at 11:52 AM. Two House Keeping (HK) workers observed to spray the residents dining tables with a chemical cleaner then wipe with a cloth, while the Residents were sitting at the table. Observed residents at two tables with glasses of liquid and straws. The surveyor pointed to a caution label on the spray bottle that said Danger, keep out of reach of children and asked the HK Supervisor (HKS) if it's a safe chemical to be spraying on the table when the residents are sitting there. HKS said its safe, we spray it like this, and demonstrated holding the cloth over the table and squirt the spray under the cloth. The chemical was labeled quat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to treat one of 13 sampled residents (Resident (R) 4) with respect and dignity while assisting with R4's meal. This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect R4's environment in promoting and maintaining her quality of life. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the residents that need assistance with their meals. Findings Include: Observation was conducted on 09/24/24 at 11:42 AM in R4's room. Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) 7 was observed assisting R4 with her lunch. CNA7 was sitting on R4's bed while assisting her with feeding. CNA7 stated that sometimes the CNAs would sit on R4's bed when assisting her with her meals due to a shortage of stools. At the same time and in the same room, CNA15 was observed assisting an unsampled resident with feeding. CNA15 was standing up. CNA15 stated that she usually stands up when assisting residents with their meals because it is easier. Interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/26/24 at 09:26 AM at the nurse's station. DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to revise one of the 13 sampled residents (Resident (R) 18) care plan after R18 had a fall with injury. This deficient practice has the potential to place R18 at risk for future falls and has the potential to affect all 34 residents in the facility. Findings Include: A review of R18's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted. R18's EHR documented that R18 had a fall on 07/19/24. A Registered Nurse (RN) note documented, Resident was conscious and responsive. Skin tears on right arm measuring 3x2cm, left arm 4x1 cm, right leg 2x1cm and abrasion on left elbow 1.5x0.2 cm. Bump and redness on the side of his right face. R18 was then sent out to the emergency room via ambulance. A review of R18's care plan was conducted. R18's care plan did not contain any update or revision for R18's plan of care after the fall on 07/19/24. Interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/26/24 at 09:26 AM at the nurse's station. After reviewing R18's care plan, DON confirmed that R18's care plan should have been revised after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in a locked compartment. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and to decrease the risk for diversion of resident's medications. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 34 of the residents in the facility. Findings Include: Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 09/26/24 at 07:10 AM in the dining room. The medication cart was seen left unattended and unlocked. Two staff members were seen walking pass the medication cart while accompanying a resident. Registered Nurse (RN) 4 was observed administering medications to R27, who was seated at the dining table. RN5 was facing the resident. When RN5 was queried about the unlocked medication cart, RN4 stated that she was nearby, but confirmed that the medication cart should have been locked since it was left unattended. Interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 09/26/24 at 09:30 AM at the nurse's station. DON confirmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — widespread
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review (RR), interviews with family and staff, the facility failed to involve and notify resident's representative(s) of scheduled care plan meetings for Resident (R)6, R7 and R29. The facility also failed to revise care plans. Findings include: 1) On 09/13/23 at 09:38 AM an interview was conducted with R7's Power of Attorney (POA)1 and POA2, who requested that the facility use bed alarms and bedrails to help prevent R7 from falling from or out of bed. POA1 was asked if they ever attend R's care plan meetings and POA1 said no they do not participate in resident's care planning and have not been notified of scheduled care plan meetings. POA1 was asked if he was given a copy of R7's care plan and he stated the facility might have given them a packet when his father-in-law was first admitted . On 0913/23 at 10:30 AM, R29 was interviewed in her room and was found to be alert and oriented to person, place, time, and situation. R29 stated that she was never invited to and has not attended her care plan meeting. On 09/15/23 during RR of R6, R7 and R29 found Care Plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0730 — widespread
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview with staff, the facility did not assure a system was in place to review the performance/competency of certified nurse aides (CNA) at least once every 12 months. This systemic deficient practice has the potential to affect the care residents receive to maintain and attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psycho-social level. Findings include: On 09/14/23 at 02:15 PM interviewed the Administrator, Assistant Administrator, and Director of Nursing (DON) in their office. Inquired whether the facility does competency checks for certified nurse aides (CNA). For example, use of Hoyer lift or peri care. DON responded the Charge Nurse may perform observations of the CNAs. And if needed, on the spot correction is done. The Administrator reported the facility does not have documentation of CNA performance/competency evaluations.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide safe storage for foods in the kitchen refrigerators and freezer and failed to develop a process to ensure that their low water temperature and chemical dishwasher was operated and monitored correctly. This deficient practice has the potential to cause harm to their residents, staff, and visitors who receive meals from the kitchen due to the possibility of contracting a food borne illness. Findings include: 1) On 09/12/23 at 08:10 AM, conducted an initial observation of the kitchen and concurrent interview with the Kitchen Manager (KM). Refrigerator #1 contained a tray with cut carrots located on the bottom shelf that was not labeled with the name of the food item and preparation date. KM confirmed that the items were carrots that were cut in the morning and will be cooked today. Refrigerator #2 contained a tray filled with meat located on the left side of the bottom shelf and a blue plastic bag containing meat on the bottom right of the shelf. KM confirmed that the meat was defrosting chicken and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility's nursing administration did not assure the facility was administered in a manner that enabled it to develop and maintain systems for residents of the facility to attain or maintain their highest practicable, physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to: support residents' right to organize and participate in a resident group; support a residents' right to voice grievances; support residents' right to have visitors; create a system for checking the sanitizing of dishes and cookware; and ensure nurse aide competencies/evaluations are being done. Findings include: 1) On 09/12/23 at 07:58 AM an entrance interview was conducted with the Assistant Administrator. Inquired who is the resident council president? The Assistant Administrator replied the facility does not have a resident council president. On 09/14/23 at 02:15 PM interviewed the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON). The Administrator reported resident council meetings are not done formally as nobody wants to be the president.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview with the Administrator, the facility did not assure the governing body oversees the Administrator's management and operations of the facility. Findings include: On 09/15/23 at 01:13 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator. Inquired who are the members of the governing body, the Administrator replied, it is mainly comprised of family members. The President is her son, the [NAME] President is her mother, the Treasurer is her husband and she is the Secretary. Also, her two daughters are the stake holders. Inquired how does the governing body oversee the Administrator's management of the facility. Further inquired how does she report to the governing body and the governing body hold her accountable for the operations of the facility. The Administrator responded this is a family owned facility and very small, what are they supposed to do.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life. The facility does not have a system to collect and use data to identify areas of improvement. Therefore, there is no evidence of performance improvement projects with monitoring of the efficacy of the project. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the quality of life and quality of care of all residents to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psycho-social well-being. Findings include: On 09/15/23 at 12:50 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator. Inquired how does the facility identify issues which require quality improvement. The Administrator responded each department completes a questionnaire for their specific area and will bring the completed questionnaire to the QAPI meeting. Based on the issues brought forth, the committee will come up with a resolution.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-09-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review and staff interview the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program to include review and update their Infection Prevention & Control-Infection Surveillance Criteria policy annually, did not establish process and outcome surveillance such as monitoring for proper handwashing, use of hand sanitizer, monitoring wound care, monitoring appropriate use of antiseptic prior to use of sterile straight catheter on a resident with iodine allergy and establishing and maintaining a water program to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens. The facility also failed to ensure that a wound dressing change for one resident (R), R3, out of a sample of one, was done utilizing clean technique. This deficient practice encourages the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and has the potential to affect all residents needing wound dressing changes in the facility. Findings include: 1) On 09/14/23 at 01:08 PM interviewed the Infection Control Coordinator (ICC) who was able…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — widespread
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety of their residents and staff by not providing accessible means to trigger the call light system should they fall in the restroom and shower room. This deficient practice could potentially cause harm to residents and staff. Finding includes: On 09/12/23 at 08:45 AM, conducted an initial observation of a shared bathroom in between two resident's rooms on a nursing unit. A small rectangle Code Alert panel with a small red button was located on the wall approximately 3.5 feet from the floor next to the toilet. On 09/13/23 at 01:14 PM, conducted a concurrent observation of the call light system in a resident's restroom and interview with the facilities maintenance staff (MS). MS confirmed that the current resident call system is the Code Alert panel containing a small red button located on the wall next to the toilet. MS stated that pushing the small red button on the Code Alert panel triggered an audio alert heard throughout the facility and a visual alert of the location of where the alarm was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to inform three of three residents reviewed for the use of psychotropic medications, Resident (R)7, R9 and R25, or the residents' representative, in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of taking medication such as an antidepressant or antipsychotic and alternative treatment options available. Findings include: On 09/15/23 during RR for R7, there was a diagnosis of vascular dementia, unspecified severity with other behavioral disturbance, and restlessness and agitation. The following medications were ordered, Risperidone (antipsychotic) tablet 0.25 milligrams (MG), give one tablet by mouth two times a day for agitation with a start date of 05/13/2023. This was given at 08:00 AM and 05:00 PM. R7 was also ordered Citalopram Hydrobromide (antidepressant) oral tablet, give 15 MG by mouth one time a day for Dementia with behavior disturbance with a start date of 05/14/2023. R7 received this medication at 08:00 AM. On 09/15/23 during RR for R9, there was a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview, the facility failed to ensure the residents of the facility exercised their right to organize and participate in a resident group. Findings include: On 09/14/23 at 07:58 AM, an Entrance Conference was conducted with the Assistant Administrator. The Assistant Administrator reported there is no Resident Council President. It was further explained that the council does not meet regularly due to the restriction of group size. On 09/14/23 at 02:15 PM, Administrator reported resident council meetings are not done formally as nobody wanted to be the president. Administrator further reported in the past they would gather residents and ask if they had any concerns. Administrator confirmed there is no documentation of these discussions with the residents. Administrator identified the Social Worker (SW) as facilitating these discussions. There were no minutes or documentation of these informal meetings that occurred and what may have been discussed in the meetings.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) On 09/12/23 at 10:47 AM went into Resident (R)23's room to introduce self to resident and make observations of his living environment. Observed closet had no door and the closet top shelf had what appeared to be water damage with blackened edges on the shelf facing the resident. On 09/13/23 at 09:02 AM while making observations of R23's room noted the damaged closet shelf was still there. On 09/13/23 at 12:50 PM met with facility maintenance staff (MS) to look at the shelf in R23's room. He noted the shelf was damaged, appeared water damaged and dry which he was able to confirm by touching the shelf and acknowledged the shelf was damaged probably from water from the AC pipes. It was noted there were two pipes coming from the wall behind this shelf. MS reported this is an easy fix as the shelf rests on the rails and he pushed up on the loose shelf showing it is not fixed in place. On 09/14/23 at 08:57 AM while speaking with R23 noted the damaged closet shelf had been taken away and told R23 the facility is replacing the damaged shelf in his closet, and he replied yes. Based on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-09-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff, the facility failed to implement a grievance system to assure residents exercised their right to file a grievance. The facility did not have an identified grievance officer, and did not maintain evidence demonstrating the result of all grievances for a period of no less than 3 years from the issuance of the grievance decision. The facility also did not implement their policy and procedure by accepting an oral grievance. This deficient practice denies the residents' right to file a grievance with an acceptable resolution. Findings include: A request was made to review the facility's grievance policy and procedures and provide documentation of grievances for the past three years. On 09/14/23 at 02:18 PM an interview was conducted with the Social Worker (SW). The SW reported that she has been employed at the facility for 1-1/2 years and there has not been any grievances. SW also confirmed the facility does don't have a log of grievances, and the facility does not have a grievance officer. SW explained when residents have a complaint,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R), R28, out of two residents sampled, was able to fulfil her right to make choices about her medical treatment by completing an Advance Health Care Directive (AHCD). This deficient practice could potentially cause harm to residents as they may be given medical treatment that they do not want. Finding includes: On 09/12/23 at 01:22 PM, observed R28 in her room after being up in her wheelchair in the activity/day room until after lunch. R28 was very conversive and found to be alert and oriented to person, time, place, and situation. R28 stated that she does not have an Advance Health Care Directive (AHCD). Record review of R28's electronic health record (EHR). Diagnosis Report revealed that R28 was admitted on [DATE] and included the conditions of having a non-cancerous tumor formed from the membrane covering the brain and the inability to move due to a severe disability, not caused by damage to the spinal cord.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview with staff member, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 7) of three residents selected for liability notice review received Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) at least two days before the end of a Medicare covered stay. This deficient practice has the potential to deny residents' right to appeal the facility's decision for discharge. Findings include: Resident (R)7's skilled nursing facility services (Part A) started on 05/13/23. A review of the NOMNC documents skilled nursing facility services ended on 06/22/23. The form was not signed and dated by the resident's representative. There was additional documentation the Social Worker (SW) contacted the family representative on 06/22/23 at 09:22 AM regarding the ending of skilled nursing services on 06/22/23 with liability to begin on 06/23/23. On 09/12/23 at 01:56 PM interview with the Office Manager found that NOMNCs are usually issued 72 hours prior to discharge. The Office Manager reported the SW will review the NOMNC with resident or representative. On 09/12/23 at 02:02 PM a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure that a complete medical summary documented by the physician, provided appropriate transfer information for the acute care of one resident (R), R20, out of a sample of one, was sent to the receiving provider. This deficient practice fails to convey R20's development of an acute medical condition and medical care received at the facility to treat the acute medical condition to ensure R20's continuity of care. Finding includes: Record review of R20's electronic health record (EHR). admission Record revealed that R20 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and then re-admitted on [DATE]. R20's diagnoses for her re-admission included acute bleeding with low blood count and fainting. Reviewed progress notes and a Social Services Note documented on 05/31/23 at 02:12 PM stated that R20 was sent to the emergency room (ER) by her primary care physician (PCP) because she was found to have a low blood count. Another Social Services Note documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours for two sampled residents upon admission, Residents (R)6 and R7. The facility was aware residents were prescribed psychotropic medications and failed to develop interventions for the use of these medications. Findings include: On 09/14/23 at 05:03 PM, Director of Nursing (DON) provided copies R6's baseline care plan from 11/7/2022 and under Behavior/Mood the Psychotropic Use box was checked off but intervention lines were left blank. DON agreed this area should have been filled out with interventions. Continued interview with DON, who also provided copies of R7's baseline care plans, from 05/13/23 and 08/25/23. It was noted on the 05/13/23 baseline care plan under Behavior/Mood, Behaviors and Psychotropic Use was checked off with no interventions. On R7's baseline care plan, dated 08/25/23, under Behavior/Mood, Behaviors was also checked off but left blank, psychotropic use and other interventions were left blank. RR found resident was ordered Risperidone 0.25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility failed to assure discharge planning was done prior to resident's discharge. There was no evidence to support this was a resident-initiated discharge and the facility did not ensure the resident had durable medical equipment, assess the home, and/or assess whether the resident would benefit from community services to support the resident in the home. This deficient practice has the potential to affect safe discharge. Findings include: Resident (R)38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a hospital for diagnosis of acute fracture of right superior and inferior pubic ramus and right iliac wing related to a mechanical fall on 08/6/23. R38 received physical and occupational therapy services. Review of R38's Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) documents skilled services to end on 08/25/23, however, R38 was discharged home on [DATE]. Review of notification to the Ombudsman documents, family requested discharge after completion of therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff member, the facility did not ensure one (Resident 38) of one residents reviewed for discharge had a discharge summary which included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 08/25/23. On 09/14/23 at 08:53 AM, the facility provided a copy of R38's discharge summary. The Discharge Summary form was completed by the physician. The summary included the resident's name, final diagnosis and where he was admitted from. The form also included spaces to document the following, pertinent findings, significant lab data x-ray and consultation, instruction for further care, discharge medications, and prognosis. The physician drew a line in the space provided. The physician documented for course of stay in the facility SNF LOC and condition of discharge as stable. On 09/14/23 at 09:00 AM interview was done with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to assure one of two residents sampled had an effective pain management program. The resident's pharmacological interventions, including the parameters for use of prn pain medications were not clarified to guide staff in identifying which medication to provide to manage resident's pain. Also, staff was unaware of prn medications that were available to manage the resident's pain. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the resident's well-being (i.e. mood, mobility, sleep). Findings include: Resident (R)89 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses of rectal pain/anal fissure and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, with other behavioral disturbance. On 09/12/23 at 09:35 AM met R89 during the initial tour. R89 was observed lying in bed and reported having pain to her okole (buttock) and private area. She was asking for Tylenol. On 09/12/23 at 01:11 PM interviewed R89 in her room. She reported that she has problems…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-15 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff, the facility failed to assure 2 (Residents 31 and 23) of 5 residents had the opportunity to receive the pneumococcal vaccines, unless medically contraindicated, refused or was already immunized. Residents consented to the administration of the pneumococcal vaccine and at most, 1-1/2 years later, the facility was not aware of the vaccine status or provided the vaccine. This practice has the potential to place residents at risk for developing pneumonia. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the Vaccine Consent/Declination Form noted the resident's representative gave consent for the pneumococcal vaccine on 10/26/22. However, the documentation of the date the vaccine was given was blank. Further review found no documentation of the administration status of the pneumococcal vaccine. 2) R23 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. A review of the Vaccine Consent/Declination Form noted the resident's representative gave…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-09-15 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on complaint report and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents of the facility had the right to receive visitors. Findings include: On 11/28/22, the Office of Health Care Assurance (OHCA) received a complaint alleging the facility was not allowing visitors due to identification of COVID-19 cases. The complainant provided photos of signage in the window which read, Please No Visitors At this time. Thank you. There was also a stand with a posted sign, COVID-19 cases have been identified in the facility. No visitors are allowed at this time until further notice. On 09/14/23 at 01:00 PM an interview was conducted with the Infection Control Coordinator (ICC). ICC reported the facility had a COVID-19 outbreak at the end of last year. ICC was agreeable to check on when the facility had the outbreak. Inquired whether the facility did not allow visitors at this time. ICC reported during an outbreak, the facility would notify families and strongly discourage visitation. Further queried were signs posted during this time to restrict visitors. ICC responded she could not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-06 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and document review, the facility's nursing administration failed to ensure processes were in place to promptly identify resident-specific care needs including range of motion/contracture management and feeding assistance. Specifically, the facility: - failed to ensure licensed nursing staff regularly assessed residents to determine if their range of motion (ROM) was intact and determine if additional interventions were needed to address declines in range of motion. This failed practice affected 2 (Residents #14 and #28) of 2 sampled residents who had hand contractures. - failed to ensure a process was developed and implemented to ensure a paid feeding assistant provided dining assistance only for residents with no complicated feeding problems. This failed practice affected 2 (Residents #24 and #30) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for feeding assistance. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 10/06/2022 at 8:20 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated there was no facility policy related to contractures or restorative nursing.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff implemented appropriate infection control practices during 3 of 3 meals observed. Specifically, staff opened and handled residents' straws and chopsticks with their bare hands while preparing residents' beverages and setting up residents' meal trays. Findings included: On 10/05/2022 at 4:30 PM, Activity Aide (AA) #1 was observed placing straws in two beverages on a resident's meal tray with her bare hands, touching the ends that would go into the resident's mouth. On 10/06/2022 at 7:09 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was observed preparing water and juice for a resident. RN #1 opened straws and placed them in the cups, touching the straws at the ends that would go into the resident's mouth with bare hands. On 10/06/2022 at 11:17 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1 was observed opening disposable chopsticks for Resident #15; CNA #1 touched both ends of the chopsticks with bare hands before giving them to the resident. On 10/06/2022 at 11:21 AM, CNA #1 opened straws for two drinks for a resident and touched…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a dependent resident was dressed in a manner to maintain the resident's dignity for 1 (Resident #14) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for dignity. Findings included: Review of an undated facility policy titled, Resident [NAME] of Rights, revealed, The facility will treat you with dignity and respect in full recognition of your individuality. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #14 had a diagnosis of essential (primary) hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a staff assessment for mental status. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent on one-person assistance for dressing. Observation on 10/03/2022 at 11:00 AM revealed Resident #14 in bed, wearing non-skid socks on both hands. Observation on 10/06/2022 at 10:46 AM revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for 3 (Residents #9, #22, and #24) of 34 residents whose rooms were observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the shared room of Residents #9, #22, and #24 was not used for storage of supplies and equipment. Findings included: Review of a facility policy titled, Safe/Clean/Comfortable/Homelike Environment Policy, dated 1/2012, revealed, The facility must provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #9 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a staff assessment for mental status. Review of a quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed Resident #22 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a staff assessment for mental status. Review of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to develop a care plan to address hand contractures for 1 (Resident #28) of 2 sampled residents who had hand contractures. This had the potential to affect 11 residents who had contractures, per the Resident Census and Conditions of Residents form dated 10/03/2022. Findings included: During an interview on 10/06/2022 at 3:57 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was looking for a care plan policy. A care plan policy had not been provided as of the end of the survey. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #28 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #28 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per a staff assessment for mental status. The MDS indicated the resident was totally dependent for activities of daily living (ADLs). According to the MDS, the resident had no functional limitation in range of motion in the upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-10-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure nursing care was provided in accordance with accepted standards of practice for Resident #2 and Resident #24. Specifically, the facility: - failed to ensure assistance with repositioning was promptly provided to promote comfort for 1 (Resident #2) of 1 sampled resident reviewed for positioning. - failed to ensure neurological (neuro) checks were consistently conducted and documented after an unwitnessed fall for 1 (Resident #24) of 3 sampled residents reviewed for accidents. Findings included: 1. During an interview on 10/06/2022 at 3:02 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated she was looking for the facility's policy on positioning. No policy was provided by the end of the survey. Review of an admission Record revealed the facility admitted Resident #2 on 06/07/2022 with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance and history of falling. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE],…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided to prevent further potential decline in range of motion (ROM) for 2 (Resident #14 and Resident #28) of 2 sampled residents who had hand contractures. Specifically, the facility failed to: - regularly provide passive range of motion (PROM) exercises for Resident #14 and Resident #28. - promptly identify and address a contracture to Resident #14's right hand. - promptly identify and address bilateral hand contractures for Resident #28. - ensure licensed nursing staff regularly assessed to determine if range of motion was intact for Resident #14 and Resident #28. Findings included: 1. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #14 had diagnoses including age-related osteoporosis and essential hypertension. Review of a significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #14 scored a three on the staff assessment for mental status, indicating severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a nursing assistant (NA) who was a full-time employee completed the required competency exam for certification within four months of hire for 1 (NA #1) of 1 NA reviewed for competencies. Findings included: Review of the facility's staffing schedule for October 2022 revealed the facility employed a non-certified nursing assistant (NA #1) on a full-time basis. Review of an untitled and undated facility document with staff credentials and hire dates revealed NA #1 was hired 01/24/2022 and was not certified. During an interview on 10/05/2022 at 12:45 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked when NA #1 would be certified. The DON stated NA #1 was working on getting her certification, but the DON was not sure what her plan is. The DON indicated she was not sure what training the NA had received or whether she had taken Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) courses. The DON stated NA #1 assisted the CNAs with feeding, toileting residents, assisting with transfers, and changing incontinent briefs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-10-06 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure a paid feeding assistant provided dining assistance only for residents who had no complicated feeding problems and that decisions regarding which residents were appropriate to receive assistance from the paid feeding assistant were based on residents' assessments and plans of care for 2 (Resident #24 and Resident #30) of 2 sampled residents reviewed for feeding assistance. Findings included: During an interview on 10/06/2022 at 3:57 AM, the DON stated there was no feeding assistant policy. Review of a Certificate of Completion, revealed Activity Aide (AA) #1 completed a Temporary Feeding Assistant program on 12/04/2021. 1. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #30 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of a quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], revealed Resident #30 was severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision-making per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$87,032 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $72,144 — penalty dated 2025-01-31
  • $14,888 — penalty dated 2023-09-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ONO ENTERPRISE LTDOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/08/1967
FUKUMURA, GARYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/15/1994
FUKUMURA, PAULINEIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICERNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/15/1994

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125050. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-09-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next