No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Islands Skilled Nursing & Rehabilitation

1205 Alexander Street, Honolulu, HI 96826 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 42 certified beds · (808) 773-8700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (808) 773-8700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus candidate (CMS is watching this home)Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$89,206 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $89,206 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-16)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1907 S Beretania Street
Pharmacy
Grocery
2074 Young St · (808) 312-1019 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Wilder Ave + Metcalf St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.6%16.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder10.0%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection6.3%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.3%9.1%18.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers7.4%3.4%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.1%17.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.3%11.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.4%1.4%better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 45 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

63.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 26% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF63.0%CMS range 48.7–79.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.2–15.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.3–12.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.381.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

2.89
RN hours/ resident / day
0.04
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
2.37
RN hoursweekends
40.0%
Total nursing turnover
44.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 42 beds and averages 36.4 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.94 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 3.10 to 2.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-04-30)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

64 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 53 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-07-18 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document and record review, the facility nursing staff did not demonstrate the competency and skill set to provide one Resident (R)1 the services needed to safely care for him. Specifically, when R1 had ongoing symptoms that were not his baseline requiring additional intervention, they did not implement the process to obtain emergency physician services when unable to reach the on call provider. In addition, nursing applied a scopolamine patch (used to control secretions) on R1, that was not ordered by the physician. The patch may have resulted in significant side effects. As a result of these deficiencies, R1 suffered harm and experienced hallucinations, and increased heart rate. He as ultimately transferred to acute care facility, where he was admitted . Findings include: 1) R1 is a [AGE] year old male with a past medical history includes cerebral hemorrhage with quadriplegia, chronic respiratory failure with tracheostomy, hypertension, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to submit their staffing information based on payroll data for direct care staffing (including information for agency and contract staff) for fiscal quarter 3 of 2024 (April 1 - June 30), to the Center of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) on the schedule specified by CMS. Findings Include: Review of the CMS Payroll-Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report [NAME] Report 1705D for fiscal year Quarter 3 of 2024 (April 1 - June 30) revealed the facility Triggered for Failed to Submit Data for the Quarter which states Triggered = No Data Submitted for Quarter. On 04/30/25 at 02:30 PM an interview was conducted with the Administrator and Interim Director of Nursing (DON) in the Administrator's office. Inquired if the facility had submitted the required staffing information based on payroll data to CMS. Administrator stated there were two instances when the facility was not able to submit the PBJ information on time and he stated once you miss the deadline you are not allowed to turn anything in.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-04-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to keep record of dryer lint removal and cleaning. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility did not show that there was any dryer lint removal and/or cleaning being done. Findings include: During observation of the dryer lint traps on 04/30/25 at 10:00 AM, observation was done mid-cycle, and the lint traps had a thin layer of lint. Staff interview on 04/30/25 @ 10:05 AM, Environmental Services Director (EVS Dir) revealed that they recently stopped keeping record of dryer lint removal and cleaning but later said that they would start to keep the records again. Review of facility policy on Laundry read; Policy, the facility launders linens and clothing in accordance with current CDC guidelines to prevent transmission of pathogens . Laundry equipment will be used and maintained according to manufacturer's instructions . Dryer vents will be checked daily to ensure lint is removed properly and completely. Dryer vents are washed monthly .

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to a dignified existence for four of 15 sampled residents (Resident (R)19, R9, R13 and R16 ) was protected. Specifically, staff were standing over R9, R13 and R16 while assisting them with their meals, and R19's urinary catheter bag was not covered. These deficient practices placed the residents at risk of embarrassment, decreased enjoyment of their environment, and decreased psychosocial well-being with potential negative effects such as decreased social interaction and social isolation. Findings include: 1) On 04/27/25 at 11:52 AM, observed Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA)9 assist R9 with lunch. R9 was in bed, supine position with head elevated. CNA9 placed the meal tray on the bedside table that was on the right side of the bed. CNA9 was positioned with the bedside table on her left and R9's bed on her right. CNA9 was standing over R9 as she assisted him with his meal. 2) On 04/27/25 at 11:56 AM, observed CNA11 assist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) for two of 20 residents sampled for care plan review, Residents (R) 3 and 14. 1. R3 did not have a CP to address his need for bed rail use and interventions to keep him safe. 2. R14 did not have a CP to address his declining Range of Motion (ROM) and interventions that would be used such as Range of Motion exercises to maintain his ROM. Findings Include: 1) On 04/27/25 at 12:13 PM observed R3 lying in his bed and noticed his upper right bed rail was not on the bed. Inquired of Environmental Services Manager (ESM) if he knew where the bed rail was and he said he would search for it, stated he thinks resident's wife removed it. On 04/28/25 at 01:30 PM ESS notified surveyor staff found R3's bedrail in his bathroom and put it back on his bed. On 04/29/25 at 04:32 PM observed R3 in his bed and both side rails were on his bed. Record review of R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 04/30/25 revealed R3 had a signed Bed Rails Consent form to use bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and homelike environment. Observed a buildup of dust on the back of the ceiling mounted televisions in five rooms. As a result of this deficient practice, there is the potential to cause adverse health conditions to the residents and affect their overall mood and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: On 04/27/25 at 10:39 AM, initial screening of the residents was being conducted in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Observed back of ceiling-mounted television for Resident (R)2 had a buildup of dust. Upon closer inspection of all four televisions in the room, observed all had a buildup of dust on the back and on the wires connected to them. Asked R2 how often the staff clean the backs of the television. R2 said he has not seen any staff clean them. On 04/27/25 at 10:47 AM, screened two residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] and observe the back of both televisions in the room with a buildup of dust. Both residents in the room had a tracheostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one (Resident 18) of four residents reviewed for limitations of range of motion. The deficient practice puts the resident at risk of not having an accurate assessment and proper treatment to maintain his range of motion. Findings Include: Record review of R18's Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 04/28/25 revealed he is [AGE] years old, admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his diagnoses include, but are not limited to, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase; type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications; unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety; and tracheostomy status. Review of R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/14/24 revealed under section GG - Functional Abilities and Goals was coded as 0 - No impairment to his upper and lower extremities. Review of R18's MDS with ARD of 12/22/24 shows R18 was coded as 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for Resident (R)33's hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) and use of insulin to control it. The deficient practice could affect all the residents at the facility receiving insulin if a baseline care plan is not developed and implemented to provide effective and person-centered care. Findings Include: On 04/27/25 at 01:58 PM a family interview was conducted at R33's bedside. Inquired if R33 is receiving insulin and Family Member (FM) stated yes he started receiving insulin and his blood sugars have been good. Inquired if resident is diabetic and FM stated no that he started getting insulin when he was in the hospital. Record review of R33's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his diagnoses included, but not limited to, shock, unspecified, cardiac arrest, cause unspecified, and tracheostomy status. Review of R33's list of diagnoses, in his EHR, did not reveal a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to follow Resident (R) 22's care plan and facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown for one resident of three resident sampled for pressure ulcer/injury. The deficient practice puts the residents at risk for worsening of a pressure ulcer. Findings Include: Record review of R22's MDS with an ARD of 09/20/24 revealed resident was coded for a stage 3 pressure ulcer (PU) that was facility acquired. R22's PU is now coded as a stage 4 PU in the MDS with an ARD of 12/21/24 and continued to have the stage 4 PU for the MDS with an ARD of 03/19/25. Review of R22's care plan revealed she had the following Follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown. which was initiated on 05/31/24 and last revision done on 04/10/25. On 04/29/25 at 04:01 PM interviewed Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) in the conference room and reviewed the turning logs for R22. On R22's Turning Schedule Log for 04/21/25 and 04/23/25 at 1 PM R22 was documented on her right and at 3 PM was documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide an environment free of accident hazards for one of one residents sampled for Accident Hazards, Resident (R) 3. R3's upper right bed rail was removed from his bed which staff were unaware of. This deficient practice could put all residents at the facility, who are dependent upon staff for care, and have bed rails at risk for accidents. Findings Include: On 04/27/25 at 12:13 PM observed R3 resting in his bed. At this time noticed R3's upper right bed rail was missing from his bed. Inquired with Environmental Services Supervisor (EVS), who happened to be in the hallway outside of R3's room, where R3's bed rail could be. EVS went to R3's bed and confirmed the bed rail was missing and stated he would search for it and stated he thinks R3's wife removed it. Record review of R3's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, but not limited to, personal history of malignant neoplasm of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews, record review and review of policy, the facility failed to act on a Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendation for one resident (R) 2 of five residents sampled for Unnecessary Medication Review. As a result of this deficiency, the facility put R2 at risk for complications related to medications. Findings include: Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R2 admitted with diagnosis including Paraplegia, Depression, Anxiety, Hypertension, Pulmonary Embolism. Current medications Apixaban (to prevent blood clotting), Mirtazapine (for depression), Morphine Sulfate (for pain), Oxycodone (for pain), Sertraline (for depression). Review of Pharmacist MRR dated 02/28/25, read please consider the following labwork: Primidone level, Phenobarbital level, Magnesium level. There was no documentation that showed this was communicated to the physician. Staff interview on 04/30/25 at 02:20 PM, Interim Director of Nursing (IDON) acknowledged that the recommendation previously mentioned was not communicated to the physician. IDON said that during that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 53 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) On 04/29/25 at 08:13 AM observed medication cart two near nurse's station with keys left unattended in a disposable cup on top of the medication cart. Inquired of Registered Nurse (RN) 7 if the medication cart keys are supposed to be left on the medication cart and she stated, they told us to put them there. Inquired of RN7 who she meant and she stated manager. Inquired if RN7 is supposed to keep the keys on herself and she stated no that they were told to put the keys near the cups on top of the medication cart or the side of the cart near the medication cups and hide them. Inquired if the set of keys includes the narcotic key and she confirmed it does. Inquired of RN7 if she knew what the facility policy states regarding medication cart keys and she stated she had not seen it. At this time reviewed the medication cart Narcotic Endorsement Log and found there were two blank slots for 04/13/25 when the oncoming nurse for 0700-1900 shift and off going nurse for 1900-0700 shift did not initial confirmation of reconciliation of narcotic count. Inquired of RN7 why this occurred and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the ice machine was kept in clean and sanitary condition in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: On 04/27/25 at 09:10 AM, initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with Kitchen Manager (KM). Opened door to ice machine and observed a grayish-green buildup under the area where ice is dispensed. KM acknowledged that the ice dispenser had a buildup of a grayish-green residue. Used a dry paper towel to wipe the area and was able to remove some of the residue. KM said the ice machine was recently serviced on 03/31/25 by an outside vendor but did not notice the buildup under the dispenser. KM presented log where monthly inspection of the ice machine is documented, next service is scheduled on 04/30/25. KM said he will ask the staff to clean the dirty dispenser today and add this task on the weekly log.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to correctly fill out an accurate Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment (POLST) for one of three residents reviewed for Advance Directives, Resident (R) 18. Findings Include: Record review of R18's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his diagnoses include, but not limited to, dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase, type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin complications, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, and tracheostomy status. Continued record review revealed R18's EHR did not have an Advanced Health Care Directive appointing an agent as his Power of Attorney to make health care decisions should he become unable to. Review of R18's POLST, that was prepared on 06/18/24, revealed under section D Signatures and Summary of Medical Condition, the Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) box was marked with an X.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5) On 04/27/25 at 11:10 AM observed R31 resting in his bed. At this time observed R31's indwelling urinary catheter tubing and urinary bag, which was covered with a privacy bag, resting on the floor next to R31's bed. Record review of R31's Electronic Health Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and his diagnoses include, but are not limited to, chronic pulmonary edema, persistent vegetative state and neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, unspecified. Review of R31's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/25/25 revealed he was coded for having a urinary catheter and he is totally dependent upon staff for his care. On 04/30/25 at 02:18 PM a phone interview was conducted with the Interim Director of Nursing (DON). Inquired if it was okay for residents with a urinary indwelling catheter and the urinary bag to rest on the floor. Interim DON confirmed nothing of the Foley (urinary indwelling) catheter system should be resting on the floor. Based on observations,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record and document reviews, the facility violated federal regulations when they initiated a discharge that did not originate through the Resident's (R)1's Representative's verbal or written request, and was not in alignment with R1's goals for care and preferences. R1 was transferred to an acute care hospital for a medical condition requiring higher level of care. It was R1's Representative's intent to have him return to the facility post hospitalization. Although the facility had the capacity and capability to provide the respiratory specialty services needed, the facility inappropriately made the decision, to deny him the right to return. In addition, the medical record did not contain documentation of the required elements of this discharge. As a result of this deficient practice, R1's Representative was not given the appropriate notification of facility initiated discharge and was unable to appeal the appropriateness of discharge and R1 was denied the right to return to the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record and document reviews, the facility did not provide the required notification of transfer/discharge to one Resident's (R)1's representative out of a sample size of four. When R1 was transferred to the hospital for a higher level of care and admitted , it R1's Representatives expectation R1 would be returning to the facility when discharged . While R1 was hospitalized , the facility made the decision to not readmit. The facility failed to provide the Representative or Ombudsman written notice of the facility initiated discharge. As a result of this deficient practice R1's Representative did not have the information needed to exercise their rights to appeal the appropriateness of the facility initiated discharge. Findings include: 1) R1 is a [AGE] year old male with a history of hypertension, quadriplegia with tracheostomy and gastrostomy tube (tube placed through the abdomen in the stomach) for nutrition after a hemorrhagic stroke. He is nonverbal at baseline. R1 has had multiple…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document review and record review, the facility had an established transfer/discharge policy, but failed to follow and implement that policy and did not comply with regulations that apply to discharges. Specifically, R1 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) and hospitalized for further care. His Representative had the expectation R1 would return to the facility, but when he was ready for discharge, the facility refused to let him return and resume residence. Findings include: 1) R1 had been a resident at the facility since 03/07/2024. On 05/31/2024, he was transferred to the Emergency Department for a higher level of care. When his condition was stable, the hospital Social Service department contacted the facility Admissions Director to arrange for R1 to return to the facility. The facility informed the hospital they would not let R1 return due to concerns they had with the mother's behavior. 2) On 07/17/2024 at 10:30 AM. during an interview with the Admissions Director (AD), she said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to update one Resident's (R)1 care plan (CP) of a sample size of four. R1's representative had specific requests/preferences regarding his care, which were not included in the CP. As a result of this deficiency, the CP was not comprehensive or individualized to include agreed upon interventions. This deficient practice could affect all residents and be a barrier to meeting their highest practicable psychological and physical well-being Findings include: 1) R1 is a [AGE] year old male with a past medical history includes cerebral hemorrhage with quadriplegia, chronic respiratory failure with tracheostomy, hypertension, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), and gastrostomy tube dependent for nutrition. At his baseline, he does not require oxygen and is alert and oriented 1x-2x (person and place). He requires extensive assistance for all activities of daily living, can only make some needs known with expression, nodding head and gestures, and totally dependant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0713 — isolated
    Provide or arrange emergency care by a doctor 24 hours a day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document review and medical record review, the facility failed to provide availability of physician services 24 hours a day. On 05/31/2024, the nursing staff was unable to reach a physician/provider to discuss a Resident's (R)1 condition. This deficient practice puts any resident requiring emergency physician services at risk of delay in care, which could result in harm or death. Findings include: 1) R1 is a [AGE] year old male with a past medical history of cerebral hemorrhage, chronic respiratory failure with tracheostomy, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), gastrostomy tube for nutrition and is alert and oriented 1x-2x (person and place).He requires extensive assistance for all activities of daily living and totally dependant on staff. He was to the facility from an acute care hospital on [DATE]. On 05/31/2024, R1 had an increased heart rate (HR) and behavioral changes, and then developed a temperature. His condition required notification of a provider (Physician or Advanced Practice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide Nursing Staffing Information to include hours worked by Registered Nurses (RNs), Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) and resident census each day. Findings Include: On 05/15/24 at 08:40 AM, observed facility's Daily Assignment sheet that was posted near the nurse's station on the treatment cart. The posting listed RN and CNA names and area they were assigned to work that day and the shift. No hours worked were posted for the RNs and CNAs and no resident census for the day was included on this posting. On 05/16/24 at 02:06 PM interviewed Director of Nursing (DON). During this interview shared requirements of F732. DON confirmed his posting was missing resident census and total numbers of hours worked by RNs and CNAs.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-05-16 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on review of the Facility Assesment (FA), the facility failed to conduct, document, and annually review its facility-wide assessment. The facility used a facility assessment tool as a template in place of an up to date and accurate assessment to identify the needs of its residents. The deficient practice placed all residents in the facility at an increased risk of harm. Findings include: On 05/16/24 at 03:43 PM, FA reviewed. Requirement. Nursing facilities will conduct, document, and annually review a facility-wide assessment, which includes both their resident population and the resources the facility needs to care for their residents. The FA was missing accurate and up to date information regarding special treatments and conditions. Acuity 1.5; respiratory treatments, oxygen therapy 0-15, suctioning 0; tracheostomy care 0; ventilator or Respirator 0. Facility matrix reviewed. 24 Residents with tracheostomies; 15 residents on mechanical ventilators and require special respiratory treatments.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) for three of 34 residents sampled (Resident (R) 4, R12, and R29) with psychotropic and sedative medications. Non-pharmacological interventions and monitored behaviors were not included in the residents' CP. Findings include: Cross Reference to F758. The facility failed to specify and monitor behaviors related to the psychotropic medications administered. 1) R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of R4's physician orders included psychotropic medications, trazodone (antidepressant) 200 milligrams (mg) daily as needed (PRN) for insomnia, trazadone 50 mg PRN every eight hours for anxiety, and sertraline (antidepressant) 175 mg a day for depression. On 05/16/24 at 11:31 AM, concurrent record review and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 23 was done. Review of R4's CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to update the care plan for one Resident (R) 27 with treatment plans and recommendations. R27 has a tracheostomy and wears a Passy Muir valve (PMV) to improve communication. R27's representative's decision to not have a tracheostomy cap (T-cap) trial were discussed at the interdisciplinary team (IDT) meeting but not included in the care plan. The deficient practice has the potential to dishonor R27 and her representative's rights. Findings include: Cross reference to F551 rights exercised by representative. On 05/16/24 at 08:30 AM, requested a copy of R27's care plan and IDT meeting minutes for the past six months. Received and reviewed a written copy of the IDT meeting dated: 09/11/23 at 09:00 AM from Director of Nursing (DON). Handwritten care plan summary with IDT. No documentation found on the report to include capping the trachea (trach) or to wean off of the trach. Reviewed the social services quarterly IDT meeting dated 03/20/24. Respiratory Summary: Reviewed and discussed current treatment. Verbalized understanding. 3.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standard of practice for one of 16 residents sampled (Resident (R) 29). The facility did not follow the physician ordered bowel instruction and as a result, R29 was placed at increased risk of avoidable skin breakdown, infection and discomfort. Findings include: R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, chronic kidney disease stage 4, gastrotomy status, tracheostomy status, muscle weakness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, bed confinement status, long term use of antibiotics, unspecified Escherichia coli (E. coli) as the cause of diseases classified elsewhere, pneumonia, and abnormalities of gait and mobility. Review of R29's physician orders included Senna-Docusate (stool softener), give one tablet via G-Tube two times a day for constipation, hold for loose stool. Review of R29's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found R29 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented in the residents' medical record that a review of the medication regimen review (MMR) recommendation from the pharmacist was reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it for three of five residents sampled (Resident (R) 4, R12, and R29). Findings include: 1) Review of R4's physician orders included psychotropic medications, trazodone (antidepressant) 200 milligrams (mg) daily as needed (PRN) for insomnia and trazadone 50 mg PRN every eight hours for anxiety. Review of R4's monthly MRR found recommendations in August 2023, October 2023, and November 2023 with no documentation from the physician that the MRRs were reviewed. In August, October, and November the pharmacist recommended the physician to provide a specific stop date or time period and a clinical rationale to continue trazodone PRN psychotropic medications past 14 days. On 05/16/24 at 11:31 AM, concurrent record review and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 23 was done. Concurrent record review found…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to specify and monitor behaviors related to psychotropic and sedative medications for three of five residents sampled (Resident (R) 4, R12, and R20); and failed to ensure a PRN (as needed) psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days or ensure the physician document their rationale to extend the 14 days in a residents medical record for one of five residents sampled (R4). Findings include: 1) R4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of, but not limited to, major depressive disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and insomnia. Review of R4's physician orders included psychotropic medications, trazodone (antidepressant) 200 milligrams (mg) daily as needed (PRN) for insomnia, trazadone 50 mg PRN every eight hours for anxiety, and sertraline (antidepressant) 175 mg a day for depression. On 05/16/24 at 11:31 AM, concurrent record review and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 23 was done. Review of R4's Treatment Administered Record (TAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations of two of four residents (Resident (R) 17 and R31), record review, one closed record review for R37 and interview the facility failed to ensure its medication error rate was not five percent or greater, an error rate of 38.36 percent (10 errors out of 26 opportunites). This deficient practice could put all residents at risk for medication errors which could include medications given the wrong route and receiving medication when it should be held which could put the residents at risk for harm. Findings Include: 1) On 05/15/24 at 08:50 AM observed Registered Nurse (RN) 80 prepare and pass medication to R17 on the third floor. Prior to medication pass the nurse reported R17's blood pressure was 116/65 and pulse was 67. R17 is a [AGE] year old resident who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but are not limited to,cognitive communication deficit, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side and anoxic brain damage, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure it established and maintained an infection prevention control program to prevent the spread of infections evidenced by the following: Environmental cleaning of resident's rooms was not being routinely conducted; resident care equipment was not cleaned and left in resident rooms; disposable care equipment was reused; and an infection control and prevention policy was not complete for the provision of infection prevention and control based on recognized guidelines, facility assessment; environmental cleaning and disinfection for resident care areas and equipment; and the kitchen was found with areas where residents food could be contaminated. The deficient practice places all residents in the facility at an increased risk for illness. Findings include: 1) Random observations were conducted in R31's room on 05/13/24 and 05/14/24 of resident R31's suction canister, cross reference to F695. On 05/15/24 at 08:51 AM observation in room…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided privacy and dignity while receiving care in the facility for three of 16 residents (Resident (R) 4, R7 and R26). R4 and R7 had urinary catheter bags that were uncovered and visible to people in the hall. R26 was exposed staff and visitors in the room during personal care. This deficient practice disregarded the resident's right to dignity and respect. Findings include: 1) On 05/14/24 at 2:55 PM, observation in R26's room. R26 is a dependent male resident on a mechanical ventilator who's bed is next to the open door and in a room with three other residents. The privacy curtain was half closed and revealed R26 laying in his bed naked, while receiving personal care from Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) 12 and CNA68. The surveyor pulled the curtain closed saying I'll close the curtain to give .[R26] .privacy, and noted the curtain was too short, leaving a large gap at the head of the bed. The CNAs said to the surveyor, it's too short. The privacy curtain was not large enough to drape…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the rights of a resident's representative in a medical treatment decision to insert a tracheostomy cap (T-cap) was exercised. The deficient practice dishonored the resident representative's right to make important decisions in the care and treatment for Resident (R) 27. Findings include: Electronic Health Record (EHR) reviewed. R27 is an [AGE] year-old female resident, admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included respiratory failure with a tracheostomy (an artificial airway in the throat). R27 is dependent on staff for her care and Family Member (FM) 3 is her legal guardian and makes R27's healthcare and treatment decisions. 05/14/24 at 10:54 AM, observation and interview with FM3 who reported that two months ago a Speech Therapist (SLP) who no longer works here did something that really upset her. The SLP had the respiratory therapist (RT) apply a T-cap to R27's trach. FM3 stated that she was very upset because placing the cap…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure written copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form was provided and acknowledged by the beneficiary (resident) or the beneficiary's representative according to the NOMNC instructions for three of three residents sampled (Resident (R) 190, R191, and R192). Findings include: Review of R190's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found R190 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. R190's Minimum Data Set (MDS) at discharge with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/16/24 documented R190's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) a 14 out of 15 (cognitively intact). Review of R191's EHR found R191 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged home on [DATE]. R191's MDS at discharge with an ARD of 03/23/24 documented R191's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) a 15 out of 15 (cognitively intact). Review of R192's EHR found R192 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to a care home on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately but no later than two hours after the allegation was made or allegation of mistreatment and an injury of an unknown origin within 24 hours to the State Survey Agency (SA) for two of two residents sampled (Resident (R) 34 and R10). Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure Abuse Investigation and Reporting with no effective, revision or review date documented All alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, including injuries of an unknown source and misappropriation of poverty will be reported by the facility Administrator, or his/her designee, to the following persons or agencies: .The State licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing the facility .will be reported immediately, but no later than: a. Two (2) hours if the alleged violation involves abuse OR has resulted in serious bodily injury; or b. Twenty-four (24) hours if the alleged violations does not involve abuse AND has not resulted in serious bodily injury. 1) On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to prevent further potential abuse or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress for Resident (R) 34. The facility did not remove Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) 16 from the facility providing access to the resident and/or other vulnerable residents while the investigation was in process. Findings include: Cross reference to F609. The facility failed to report an allegation of abuse immediately but no later than two hours or allegation of mistreatment within 24 hours after the allegation was made to the State Survey Agency (SA) for R34. On 05/10/24 at 08:36 AM, the SA was informed by the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO), of an incident that occurred on 05/08/24 during the LTCO's resident visits at the facility. The LTCO reportedly informed the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator on 05/08/24 of possible resident to staff abuse between R34 and CNA16 and requested they send a report for an allegation of physical and verbal abuse to the SA and Adult Protective Services (APS). On 05/13/24 at 10:47 AM, an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure written notification of transfer/discharge was provided to the resident or resident's representative, as soon as practicable, before transferred or discharged and send a copy of that notice to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) for one of three residents sampled (Resident (R) 29). Findings include: R29 was transferred and admitted to the hospital on three separate occasions, on 01/01/24 to 01/09/24 with diagnoses of tachycardia and recurrent aspiration pneumonia, on 02/01/24 to 02/06/24 with diagnosis of acute aspiration pneumonia, and on 03/26/24 to 04/01/24 with diagnosis of acute respiratory failure with hypoxia. A review of R29's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found no documentation that a written notification for transfer to the hospital was provided to R29 or his representative and LTCO for the three hospitalizations. On 05/15/24 at 01:02 PM, an interview with Social Services Director (SSD) was done. SSD reported the facility did not give written notification for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview the facility failed to re-assess Resident (R) 15 for falls quarterly. The deficient practice puts all residents who are at risk for falls or have had a change in their fall risk if the assessment is not completed and interventions added and implemented to the care plan. Findings include: On 05/14/24, during record review of R15's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found R15's last fall assessment was dated 12/12/23. The next quarterly fall assessment was due 3/12/24 and this was not done. On 05/14/24 at 03:15 PM interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) 79, nurse assigned to R15 and inquired when was the last fall assessment completed for R15 and how often are they due. RN79 stated she is new to facility and does not know but will find out and let me know. RN79 stated the computer will generate when the next assessment has to be done and will make it available for the nurses to fill out. On 05/15/24 at 03:52 PM, interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) and inquired when fall assessments are due and he stated quarterly. Inquired about R15's last fall assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to include Resident (R) 35's daily preferences to her baseline care plan which is to be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission. Findings Include: On 05/13/24, record review of R35's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R35 is a [AGE] year old resident with diagnoses that include, but are not limited to adjustment disorder, unspecified, functional quadriplegia who has a tracheostomy (breathing tube in neck) and uses a ventilator (machine) to help her breath. Review of R35's baseline care plan found it was filled out on 04/23/24. Section 1. General Information and Initial Goals D. Daily Preferences that Resident Prefers was left blank. Resident prefers the following (check all that apply) 1. Choosing clothes to wear. 2. Caring for personal belongings. 3. Receiving tub bath. 4. Receiving shower. 5. Family or significant other involvement in care decisions and 6. Other (specify). This section was left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with supplies necessary to maintain optimal nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for seven residents in the sample (Resident (R) 1, R7, R26, R27, R31, R33, and R4). Six of the seven residents in the sample are receiving enteral nutrition (fed by tube) by gravity instead of a pump due to a shortage of the pump tubing, and R33 had significant weight loss; R27 frequently runs out of suction toothbrushes needed for her increased secretions; and R4 is provided briefs to small for him. The deficient practice places residents who require maximal/ dependent assistance in the facility at risk of achieving maximum physical health and well-being. Findings include: 1) Random observations conducted in residents' rooms on 05/13/24 at 10:55 AM, 11:00 AM; 02:15 PM and 05/14/24 at 09:35 AM; 02:00 PM; 04:30 PM. Observed R1, R7, R26, R27, R31, and R33 with tube feedings being provided by gravity drip with pumps that were not in use attached to the poles. Electronic Health Record (EHR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to change a suction cannister half full of red-brown secretions and clots for one of three residents in the sample (Resident (R) 1). The deficient practice placed residents receiving tracheostomy care at an increased risk of illness. Findings include: Cross reference to F880. Electronic Health Record (EHR) reviewed. R1 is a dependent female resident admitted on [DATE] A sputum culture was obtained that resulted in a bacterial infection on 05/06/24, R1 was started on intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Random observations were conducted in R1's room on 05/13/24 at 11:16 AM, and 05/14/24 at 09:14 AM. R1's suction cannister noted with dark red brown fluid with clots, volume 50 percent full. The date on the cannister was smeared and not readable. On 05/14/24 at 01:45 PM, observed the cannister was replaced with a new cannister with the current date. On 05/14/24 at 02:09 PM interview with Respiratory Therapist (RT) 22 and the Respiratory Therapist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3) On 05/15/24 at 09:45 AM, inspected medication cart RN80 was using. While checking narcotics reviewed Narcotic Endorsement Log and found two blank spaces dated 05/03/24 0700-1900 ON and 1900-0700 OFF. Inquired of RN80 why these were left blank and RN80 stated someone forgot to sign the form. On 05/17/24 at 03:40 PM interviewed DON and inquired if nurses are expected to sign the Narcotic Endorsement Log after the narcotic count is done and he confirmed this. Showed DON the May 2024 Narcotic Endorsement Log and he stated staff forgot to sign the form. Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to label medications in accordance with acceptable professional standards, including expiration date, and store medications in a locked compartment when left unattended by authorizing administering nursing staff for three residents sampled (Resident (R) 1, R4, and R14) .The facility also failed to assure the narcotic medication count was endorsed each shift by having the nurses sign the Narcotic Endorsement Log when coming on shift and going off shift. The deficient…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure nurses accurately documented in two sampled residents' record (Resident (R) 17 and R14). The nurse did not accurately document the route Resident (R) 17 received his medications and a cup full of medications left on R14's bedside table unattended was documented in the Medication Administration Record (MAR) as administered. This deficient practice could put all residents at risk for incorrect documentation of medications administered to them. Findings Include: 1) Cross reference to F759 . The facility failed to assure it was free of medication error rate of five percent or greater with a nurse incorrectly documenting medications given the wrong route resulting in medication administration errors and documentation errors for Resident (R) 17. On 05/15/24 at 08:50 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN) 80 prepare and pass medication to R17. During medication preparation RN80 read each medication blister pack and popped out the medication into an individual medication cup which she labeled. Observed RN80 crushed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccination was offered to one of the six residents (R) 3 in the sample. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for acquiring, transmitting and developing possible complications from pneumococcal disease. Findings Include: On 09/06/23 at 11:38 AM, review of R3's electronic health record (EHR) conducted. R3 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (disease that affects nerve cells in the brain and spinal cord causing loss of muscle control), chronic respiratory failure, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, adult failure to thrive (syndrome of weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition and often accompanied by depressive symptoms and impaired immune function). R3 also had a tracheostomy (opening created at the front of the neck where a tube is inserted into the windpipe) and is ventilator (breathing machine) dependent. CDC guidance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-06 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R), R28, out of the six residents sampled, had the appropriate documentation for the administration or refusal of the COVID-19 vaccination. This deficient practice fails to ensure that residents and/or their representatives were educated about the COVID-19 vaccine and that the COVID-19 vaccination could be administered while in the facility. Findings Include: Record review of R28's electronic health record (EHR). The Medical Diagnosis tab revealed that R28 was admitted for a stroke on 08/15/23. The Immunization tab did not have an entry for the administration of the COVID-19 vaccine. An admission Summary progress note for 08/15/23 at 3:36 PM documented by a nurse stated, . COVID: NEGATIVE. COVID vaccine TBD [to be determined] by ID [Infectious Disease] RN [Registered Nurse]. On 09/06/23 at 12:38 PM, a concurrent observation of R28's EHR and interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) nurse were conducted in the conference room. The IP's Health Status Note dated 08/15/23 at 4:28 PM was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to an environment that promotes enhancement of his or her quality of life, as evidenced by staff speaking a foreign language while providing care to residents was honored by staff members. Findings include: On 05/22/23 at 10:42 AM an interview was conducted with resident council representatives. During the interview R24 stated, they don't speak English sometimes. When asked how he felt about staff speaking a foreign language around him, he replied, you in America, talk English. On 05/24/23 at 11:00 AM R3 stated that staff still speak in Filipino around the residents, but it doesn't bother him. R3 added, but it might bother other residents. A review of the facility's Resident Council Minutes was conducted on 05/22/23 at 02:20 PM. According to the Resident Council Minutes dated 06/24/22,CNAS [Certified Nurse Aides] are talking loud in their language around residents, residents are bothered. Furthermore, Resident Council Minutes dated 04/26/23 stated, staff continues to speak to each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-25 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to post the results of the facility's most recent State survey, that is easily accessible to residents, legal representatives, and family members. Findings include: A resident council interview was conducted with resident representatives on 05/24/23 at 11:00 AM. Residents were asked if the result of the State inspection was available for the residents to read, Residents 3 and 26 both answered, no. A concurrent observation and interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on 05/24/23 at 01:30 PM. When asked for the locations of the State survey report, DON pointed at the coffee table located on the first floor near the facility entrance. He then stated that there should also be a copy in the Medical Records Director's office on the fourth floor. Further asked if the residents had access to the State survey results on the units, DON answered, yes, both the units should have one. SA then requested for the DON to show the locations of the State survey report on both the second and third-floor units. DON and SA walked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide written notice of discharge to the resident or residents' representative for three residents (R) sampled, R6 and R38 who were discharged to an acute care hospital for a higher level of care, and R22, who was discharged home. The facility also failed to send a notice of discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO). Findings include: Cross Reference to F625 - Notice of Bed Hold Policy Before/Upon Transfer (written notification of bed hold policy was not provided to residents or representatives). 1) R6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 05/23/22 at 10:45 AM review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R6 was admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE] for scrotal abscess (accumulation of pus). Discharge notification and LTCO notification were not found in EHR. On 05/25/23 at 08:40 AM, a copy of the discharge notifications was requested from the Medical Records Director (MRD). At 09:36 AM, MRD…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-25 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy for two residents (Residents 6 and 38) in the closed record sample. This deficient practice has the potential for miscommunication with residents that are discharged or transferred out of the facility. Findings include: Cross Reference to F623 - Notice Requirements Before Transfer/Discharge (written notice of discharge was not provided to residents or residents' representatives) 1) On 05/23/22 at 10:45 AM review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R6 revealed that he was admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. Discharge and bed-hold policy notifications were not found in EHR. During a concurrent interview and record review with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 05/23/23 at 01:00 PM, DON was not able to find or provide documentation that the resident or resident's family was notified of the facility bed-hold policy. 2) R38 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff, resident, and resident's representative, the facility failed to: 1) provide services for a resident that had a craniectomy (neurosurgical procedure that involves removing a portion of the skull to relieve pressure on the underlying brain) related to a motor vehicle accident, including scheduling of follow up appointments with the nuerosurgeon or development a care plan to address precauations while caring for this vulnerable resident; and 2) ensure nursing care provided for residents with gastrostomy tube (g-tube) met the needs of two residents in the sample (R19 and R189), and were in alignment with standards of good clinical practice and/or facility policy and procedure. as evidenced by nurses not verifying proper placement of the G-tube prior to use. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference to F689, Accidents. Resident (R)33 had a fall and based on a root cause analysis the facility did not revise the care plan to include interventions for fall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-05-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure there was enough staff to provide services and respond to each resident's needs in a timely manner, as evidenced by a complaint of long waits for call light response, and staffing ratios on both the second and third floor that were not in alignment with the Facility Assessment. As a result of this deficient practice, at least one resident experienced a decreased quality of life, was placed at risk of physical decline, and was unable to attain his highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 05/22/23 at 08:20 AM, an interview was done with Resident (R)17 at his bedside. When asked whether there was sufficient staff to meet his needs, R17 reported that he has waited ten (10) minutes on a good day, up to forty-five (45) minutes at times, for a response to his call light. R17 stated the only way to get help sometimes is to just keep on the call button. R17 continued on to state that even a 10-minute wait is too long when you…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that the drug regimen of each resident was reviewed once a month by a licensed pharmacist, and that recommendations made by the licensed pharmacist were acted upon by the attending physician. The Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for the month of October 2022 was missing for four of the five residents (R) sampled for psychotropic medications (R26, R17, R21, and R20), and the physician failed to act upon recommendations for two of the five residents sampled (R26 and R17). As a result of this deficient practice, the residents were placed at risk of avoidable complications related to their medications. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility taking psychotropic medications. Findings include: 1) On 05/23/23 at 09:33 AM, conducted a review of R20's Electronic Health Records (EHR). List of medications included Lorazepam (sedative) 1 milligram (mg) every 6 hours as needed for restlessness and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were securely stored in locked compartments. Proper storage and labeling of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices, and to decrease the risk of medication errors and diversion of resident medications. Findings include: 1) On 05/22/23 at 10:58 AM, an observation was done of Registered Nurse (RN)22 leaving the medication cart designated for the male residents on the second floor unlocked while he left the floor. When he returned to the second floor, RN22 was observed going directly into room [ROOM NUMBER]. Upon exit of room [ROOM NUMBER], RN22 was asked about the unlocked medication cart. RN22 stated I'm sorry, and explained that he does not usually leave it unlocked. Confirmed that the medication cart was solely assigned to him for the shift. On 05/22/23 at 01:46 PM, observed the same medication cart (designated for the male residents on the second floor) unlocked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to provide a clean area to prepare food for the residents. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents, visitors and staff who have meals served by the facility with food-borne illnesses. Findings include: On 05/22/23 at 08:03 AM, initial tour and observation was done in the kitchen area with the Director of Dietary Services (DDS). Noted pipes for the sprinkler system that ran across the ceiling immediately above the food preparation area was covered with dust. On 05/24/23 at 08:13 AM, concurrent interview and observation conducted with DDS in the kitchen area. Noted the pipes for the sprinkler system above the food preparation area were now free of dust. Asked DDS when the pipes were cleaned and how often they did it. DDS said the kitchen staff clean the sprinkler pipes once a month or as needed. Asked DDS if they have a log for when the task is completed, he said that they have a log they use daily to document tasks the kitchen staff completed at the end of the day, but it does not include the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for seven residents, physician progress notes were documented in the wrong record. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the medical care residents receive at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 05/25/23 at 08:59 AM, while reviewing the EHR for R17, three (3) physician progress notes in the last month had contained documented medical information for three different residents other than R17. One on 05/23/23 for R190. A second on 05/16/23 for R28. A third progress note on 04/28/23 for R9. 2) On 05/24/23 at 11:13 AM, conducted a review of R20's EHR. Under Progress Notes, noted an entry from the attending physician done on 05/23/23 at 07:55 AM. Entry contained the name and medical information for R190. Further review revealed that the attending physician also made entries on 05/16/23 at 08:53 AM and on 05/12/23 at 08:11 AM that contained the name and medical information for R16. Notified Registered Nurse (RN)11 of attending physician's entry in R20's progress notes that contained other…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to prevent the possible spread of infectious illnesses to other residents. The facility failed to follow airborne precautions put in place for one resident (R) 189. This deficient practice has the potential to spread infectious illnesses to other residents in the facility. Findings Include: On 05/22/23 at 09:18 AM, initial observation conducted on the second-floor unit. room [ROOM NUMBER] is occupied by four residents, including R189. A sign outside of the room indicated that R189 was on droplet precautions and the following personal protective equipment were required when providing care: mask, gown and gloves. Registered Nurse (RN) 22 was observed entering room [ROOM NUMBER] wearing only a mask holding a medicine cup filled with liquid and an empty cup. RN22 then placed the items on the bedside table, performed hand hygiene, and donned gloves. RN22 proceeded to administer the medication to R189 through his gastrostomy tube without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to identify and support one resident's (R)17 preference to not be placed in a yellow gown. As a result of this deficient practice, R17 did not have his needs met and was placed at risk of not attaining his highest practicable well-being. Findings include: An observation was done on 05/22/23 at 08:20 AM of Resident (R)17 in bed with a bright yellow facility gown on. When asked about the yellow gown, R17 stated I don't like it, I prefer the other gown, the blue one. On 05/23/23 at 07:29 AM, an interview was done with R17 in his room. R17 stated that he has told the CNAs [certified nurse aides] his preference to wear blue, but he still is put in whatever is available. On 05/25/23 at 08:00 AM, observed R17 in bed wearing another yellow gown. When asked about it, R17 shrugged and stated, I have no choice in the matter . they [staff] don't seem to think so, they keep putting me in this.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to provide safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents. The facility failed to repair damaged linoleum floor, and ripped privacy curtain for one of the residents (Resident (R) 20) sampled and in two additional rooms. Findings include: On 05/22/23 at 08:33 AM, initial observation was done on the third-floor unit. Observed drawn privacy curtain for R20 in room [ROOM NUMBER] with two holes on the lower portion of it. The linoleum flooring on the foot of the bed was also in disrepair exposing the old, darker colored flooring under the existing one. R20's bed was located closest to the door making the damaged floor and ripped privacy curtain visible from the hallway of the unit. Observed the rest of the rooms on the third floor and noted rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] also had cracks in the linoleum by the foot of the beds. On 05/25/23 at 10:11 am, concurrent observation and interview was done with the Director of Maintenance and Environment Services…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to develop and implement person-centered Comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 2 of 12 residents in the sample (Residents 19 and 21). As a result of this deficient practice, both Resident (R)19 and R21 were placed at risk for avoidable injury and/or declines in their quality of life and were prevented from attaining their highest practicable well-being. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F684 QOC. Despite two visits to the emergency room for malpositioning of his gastrostomy tube (G-tube), the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan to verify proper placement of the G-tube prior to use for R19. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed R19 at risk for avoidable pain and injury. 2) R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses that include retention of urine, gross hematuria (blood in his urine), and benign prostatic hyperplasia (an enlarged prostate gland that causes problems with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews with staff members, the facility failed to revise the care plan for 2 (Residents 33 and 13) of 12 residents in the sample. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference to F689. Resident (R)33 fell on [DATE], a post fall risk assessment was completed. There was no documentation that R33's current care plan interventions were effective, therefore revisions were not indicated to prevent falls. Also, there was no documentation that based on post fall evaluation, the care plan was revised for fall prevention. 2) Cross Reference to F689. R13 had a history of falls and had an actual fall on 04/16/23. There was no documentation of care plan revisions to prevent further falls or there was no documentation of a need for revisions were needed, the current interventions are effective for fall prevention.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with staff, residents, and resident representatives, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free from accidents for 2 (Residents 33 and 13) of 3 residents in the sample. The facility did not complete an initial fall risk assessment to develop interventions for fall prevention and did not assure monitoring for effectiveness and modifying interventions were done as necessary. Findings include: A review of the Fall Risk Assessment policy and procedure provided by the facility documented the nursing staff, in conjunction with the attending physician, consultant pharmacist, therapy staff, and others, will seek to identify and document resident risk factors for falls and establish a resident-centered falls prevention plan based on relevant assessment information. A review of the Falls and Fall Risk, Managing policy and procedure noted in section titled Resident-Centered Approaches to Managing Falls and Fall Risk, 5. If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews with resident and staff member, the facility failed to assure a resident who is incontinent of bladder received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible for 1 (Resident 13) of 2 residents in the sample. Findings include: Resident (R)13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following unspecified cerebrovascular disease affecting left non-dominant side; epilepsy; and protein-calorie malnutrition. On 05/22/23 at 02:00 PM, interviewed R13. R13 was asked if she is continent of bowel and bladder. R13 responded that she is told to use her diaper for toileting. R13 stated she can recognize the urge for voiding. R13 also reported that she has had some falls and has been told to stay in bed, so she complies. A review of a significant change Minimum Data Set with an assessment reference date of 03/24/23 noted R13 coded as always incontinent of urine and bowel. R13 was coded as no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional care and services to address significant weight loss for one of two residents sampled, Resident (R)32. The attending physician and facility dietitian was not notified when R32 had a 9.24% weight loss within one month of admission to the facility. As a result of this deficient practice, the resident was placed at risk for potential complications due to impaired nutrition. Findings include: On 05/22/23 at 12:08 PM, observed R32 lying in bed with eyes closed and her lunch tray on the bedside table. Asked Registered Nurse (RN)21 if R32 was able to feed herself. RN21 replied that R23's family member (FM)1 was on her way to assist her with lunch since she did not eat breakfast that morning. RN21 also stated that FM1 works close to the facility and comes in everyday to assist R32 for meals. At 12:37 PM, observed FM1 at R32's bedside assisting her with lunch. Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff member, the facility failed to use infection control precautions to ensure syringe used for gastrostomy tube (G-tube) was discarded according to the facility's practice and sanitarily stored to prevent infections. This deficient practice has the potential to expose the resident to infections. Findings include: On [DATE] at 08:11 AM a feeding tube set was hanging on a pole for Resident (R)33 was observed. Also observed a clear plastic bag containing a syringe. The syringe was not capped. There was pink fluid at the bottom of the plastic bag. The tip of the syringe was stored in the fluid and the cap was immersed in the fluid. Also observed black substance around the interior diameter of the hub. There was a label affixed to the plastic bag with a date of [DATE]. Record review noted physician order for: enteral feed every shift for gastrostomy intermittent feed, before each intermittent feeding and PRN check for residual; and flush feeding tube with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure two (Residents 20 and 17) of five residents sampled for medication review were free from unnecessary medications. The PRN (as needed) order for a psychotropic medication (drugs affecting behavior, mood, thoughts or perception) for R20 was not limited to 14 days and reordered indefinitely without a rationale for continuance. Also, the facility failed to assure a gradual dose reduction for R17 as recommended by the pharmacist was done. Findings include: 1) On 05/23/23 at 11:13 AM, conducted a review of R20's Electronic Health Records (EHR). R20 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include history of psychoactive substance abuse, intracerebral hemorrhage (bleeding in the brain), anxiety, severe depression, and restlessness and agitation. List of medications included Lorazepam (sedative) 1 milligram (mg) every 6 hours as needed for restlessness and agitation. Review of current orders revealed that R20 had a PRN order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide food that accommodates a resident's food allergies. Resident (R)190 was served food that contained an ingredient that she was allergic to placing her at risk for an adverse health condition. Findings include: On 05/24/23 at 08:06 AM while making observations on the third-floor unit, R190 waved at surveyor and made a hand gesture to enter the room. R190 stated that after she was done with her breakfast earlier that morning, she saw Honey Nut Cheerios documented on the meal ticket. R190 said she was concerned because she is allergic to almonds and peanuts and wanted to make sure the kitchen knows about her allergies. R190 also said that she was not having any allergic reactions at the moment and already notified the nurse on duty. Review of R190's Electronic Health Records (EHR) revealed that her allergies included lisinopril, almonds, peanuts, salmon, shellfish, mold, dust mites, grass pollen blade and weeds. Care plan also documented that R190 has a rash on her back related to allergies. On 05/24/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$89,206 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $89,206 — penalty dated 2024-05-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PACIFIC HEALTHCARE VENTURES LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2020
ACCORD HOLDINGS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 02/19/2025
LACKNER, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/26/2020
SMITH, NICOLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/26/2020
MANUMALEUNA, EATHYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/19/2025
YAZAWA, KIYOTAKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$13.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$232K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 20%Other / private 19%

This home reported $232K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,029per resident / day
operating cost
$31,280per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,016per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125067. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next