Kuakini Geriatric Care, INC
347 North Kuakini Street, Honolulu, HI 96817 · Non profit - Corporation · 187 certified beds · (808) 547-9357 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- CMS lists it as a Special Focus candidate — not on the watch list itself, but among the homes CMS is watching because of its recent inspection history
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jul 2024
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $98,421 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-12)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 26.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.0% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 2.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.8% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 1.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.1% | 1.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 28.5% | 20.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 14.5% | 9.1% | 18.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 79.3% | 95.4% | 95.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.1% | 17.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.0% | 11.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.2% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 49.5% | 84.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.8% | 19.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.9% | 10.3% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.55 | 1.09 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.01 | 0.88 | 1.80 | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
71.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 71.5%CMS range 63.7–79.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.9%CMS range 6.7–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 64.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 79.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 87.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 89.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.7% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.1%CMS range 3.5–10.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 187 beds and averages 131.4 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 56 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.43 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.40 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.67 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.51 to 1.12 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
59 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to assure kitchen staff using the dishwasher waited for the water temperature to raise to 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or more during the final rinse cycle before processing the dishes from the conveyor belt, placing them on the storage racks of clean dishes, failing to assure dishware and silverware were heat sanitized. This deficient practice puts all residents and staff, who eat their meals at the facility, at risk for foodborne illness. The State Agency (SA) identified an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at §483.60 (F812) on 01/05/25 at 08:44 AM. Findings Include: On 01/05/25 at 08:43 AM an initial tour was conducted with Food Services Supervisor (FSS)1. During initial tour of the kitchen found the kitchen uses a dishwasher with high temperatures to sanitize their dishware and silverware. Review of facility log for the dishwasher stated Standards: Wash - 140-160 degrees F and Final Rinse - 180-190 degrees F. If temperature is above or below range, please inform the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2023-01-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, 1) the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed and responded to the identified irregularities on the pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for one of five residents R91) sampled for medication review. The pharmacist identified an irregularity for a resident prescribed a psychotropic medication without a diagnosis and recommended a gradual dose reduction (GDR). This placed the resident at risk for harm including negative side effects of the psychotropic medication, experiencing a fall, mental status changes, or sustained negative psychosocial outcomes. The medical record did not show evidence that the attending physician had reviewed and responded to the pharmacist MRR recommendation. 2) The facility failed to ensure the facility developed policies and procedures that included time frames for the different steps in the monthly drug regimen review process. Pharmacist MRR recommendation for October 2022 identified to GDR a psychotropic medication for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R) 9 received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards. This was evidenced by the failure to timely assess, treat, and notify the Medical Doctor (MD) 2 regarding R9's complaint of pain during repositioning in bed reported by facility staff on 04/27/26 night shift (11:00 PM - 07:30 AM) and 04/28/26 day shift (07:00 AM - 03:30 PM). This deficient practice had the potential of contributing to worsening injury to R9 as the resident was admitted to the hospital several days later for left hip fracture identified as injury of unknown source.Findings include:The Office of Health Care Assurance (OHCA) received a facility-reported incident (FRI) Intake #3004586 for R9, dated 05/02/26, documenting a left hip injury of unknown source. The State Agency (SA) entered the facility on 06/09/26 for an abbreviated survey where the FRI was investigated.R9 is an [AGE] year-old female with a most recent readmission date of 05/08/26…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review (RR) and observation, the nursing staff failed to demonstrate the competence and skill sets to provide safe nursing care in a manner to meet one resident's (R)2 physical needs. Specifically, the Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) had been administering oxygen (O2), which is outside their scope of practice. In addition, the nursing staff administered oxygen to R2, who had Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) when her oxygen saturation level (sat) was outside the parameters ordered by the physician. Due to this deficient nursing practice, there was high likelihood that a Resident with COPD and oxygen administration parameters would be administered oxygen by licensed or unlicensed staff outside the order parameters and suffer harm. When identified by the facility, this deficiency was found to be corrected immediately the following day, and at the time of survey met the criteria for past noncompliance. Findings include: 1) R2 was a [AGE] year old female with a history of end…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-12 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide documentation that written notice of transfer or discharge was provided to the resident or resident's representative (RRP), a copy of the notice was sent to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman, and documentation that written notice of bed-hold was provided to the resident or RRP for 5 of 6 residents (Resident (R) 2, R3, R4, R9, and R10) sampled for discharge process. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents needing to be transferred from the facility to the emergency room/hospital.Findings include: 1) On 06/10/26 at 02:13 PM, a review was conducted for 3 Resident charts (R4, R9, R10): R4 was sent to the Emergency Department (ED) on 02/25/26 and returned during the evening of 02/25/26. No documentation of a completed discharge/transfer and bed-hold notice was found in R4's electronic health record (EHR) or was able to be provided by the facility. On 02/26/26, R4 was again transferred to the ED. A facility form titled, Unplanned Discharge/Transfer Notice was reviewed and no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to document pertinent findings and interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident (R) 5) sampled for transfers to the emergency department (ED) due to abdominal pain. This deficient practice puts residents at risk for their needs not properly being identified and addressed. Findings Include:On 03/20/26 at 09:22 AM, the Department of Health, Office of Health Care Assurance (OHCA) received a complaint (intake #296005) from a family member (FM) 2 on behalf of R5. FM2 noted that R5 is a [AGE] year-old male who suffered a brain bleed and was admitted to the hospital on [DATE]. R5 was then transferred to the facility on [DATE] for rehabilitation. On 01/31/26, FM2 noted that R5 was complaining of severe stomachache, but the nurses thought it was just a bowel movement problem and just gave him medications. FM2 noted that R5 was in tears and kept begging to be sent to the Emergency Department (ED). R5 was sent to the ED on 02/01/26 where he was found to have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to do a thorough investigation post-fall for 2 of 5 Residents (Resident (R) 4, R10) sampled. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for further falls and injury.Findings include: 1) R10 is [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include left femur fracture with repair on 12/28/25 and dementia. On 06/12/26 at 07:02 AM, a record review was done. A nurse's progress note dated 03/09/26 at 04:18 PM documented that R10 was found on the floor and was first seen by her daughter. R10 complained of left hip pain post-fall and Medical Doctor (MD) 1 was notified. R10 was sent to the emergency room and subsequently admitted to the hospital with a hip fracture. R10 was readmitted back to the facility on [DATE] after undergoing open reduction and intramedullary nailing of left femur (surgical procedure to treat long-bone fractures) and revision of the 12/2025 intramedullary nailing of the left intertrochanteric (top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to inform the resident's representative in advance, of the risk and benefits of proposed treatment one of five residents (Resident (R)72) sampled for unnecessary medication(s). As a result of this deficient practice, residents receiving psychotropic medications are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: Review of R72's Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 01/07/25 documented the resident's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/16/24, Section C. Cognitive Functioning, Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 6, indicating the resident's cognition is severely impaired. Review of Section GG. Functional Patterns documented the resident is dependent on staff for all care. Review of R72's Physician's Orders documented orders for: Trazodone hydrochloride (HCl) Oral Tablet 50 milligrams (MG) Give 0.5 tablet by mouth two times a day for dementia behavior and agitation (Started on 12/27/24); Seroquel Oral Tablet 25 MG (Quetiapine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to develop and implement a care plan (CP) for two of 23 residents sampled. Resident (R) 89 for the use of oxygen and R38 for a urinary tract infection with extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL), a bacteria that is resistant to many antibiotics. Findings Include: 1) On 01/05/25 at 11:56 AM interviewed R89 in her room. R89 was observed sitting up in her wheelchair and had a nasal cannula on that was attached to the wall oxygen. Confirmed with R89 that her oxygen (02) was at 2 liters (L) which she reported is on at all times. Resident stated she was diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 20 years ago and only the last 2 years she has had symptoms of shortness of breath and needing to use oxygen. Review of R89's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found physician order for Supplemental O2 2-4L/min by nasal cannula with humidifier continuous to keep sats > (greater than) 90% every shift for COPD. Review of R89's CP dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions to treat one of one Resident (R)79 in the sample for constipation. The deficient practice may affect the resident's quality of life due to increased pain and discomfort. Findings include: R79 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE] for long-term care. Diagnoses included but not limited to dehydration, muscle weakness and constipation. On 01/06/25 at 10:25 AM, an interview was conducted with R79 in her room. R79 said she has constipation at times since she is less active now. Asked R79 if she takes any stool softeners, to which she replied, Yes. but does not recall how often. Review of R79's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted on 01/07/25. R79 had the following laxatives (medications that treat constipation) ordered: Senna 8.6 milligram (mg) tablet at bedtime, Lactulose 20 grams (gm) as needed if no bowel movement (BM) for two days, and Bisacodyl Suppository 10 mg if no BM for three days. Review of R79's Bowel…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding (a way of delivering nutrition directly into the stomach or small intestine) for three of the 23 sampled residents (Resident (R)74, R50 and R59). The facility did not ensure the equipment used were properly cleaned and maintained. This deficient practice has the potential to put residents on enteral feeding at risk for preventable complications. Findings include: 1) On 01/05/25 at 08:46 AM, initial screening of the residents was conducted. R74 was observed lying in bed with head elevated. A pole was next to her bed with a feeding pump attached. A plastic container filled with liquid enteral feeding formula was connected to the feeding pump. Observed the feeding pump, base of the pole and floor had some residue of dried formula. On 01/06/24 at 09:01 AM, observed R74 lying in bed with head elevated. The drops of dried-up formula were still on the pump, base of the pole and floor. Returned to R74's room at 10:37 AM and drops of dried-up formula…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to properly label oxygen tubing when it was initiated for three of four Residents (R) 89, R19 and R216 sampled for respiratory care. The deficient practice placed the residents at risk of facility acquired respiratory infections. Findings Include: Cross Reference to F656 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan 1) On 01/05/25 at 11:56 AM an interview was conducted with R89 in her room. R89 was observed sitting in her wheelchair with a nasal cannula which was hooked up to the oxygen (O2) in the wall. Inquired of R89 if the oxygen was on and she confirmed it was on and at 2 Liters per minute (LPM) at all times for her shortness of breath due to her diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Inquired of resident when does staff change the nasal cannula and she stated staff changes it out when she asks them to, when it gets dirty or wet inside the tubing. During the interview surveyor and R89 did not observe any sticker with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's infection prevention and control measures for three out of twenty-three resident sampled. a. Resident (R)23 and (R)38 who were on isolation precautions did not have signage outside of their rooms at the door. b. The facility failed to assure staff to use proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when delivering a meal to a Resident (R)72 who was on droplet precautions. This deficient practice placed everyone at risk for developing preventable infections and other adverse health complications. Findings include: 1) R23 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility for long-term care. Diagnosis included but not limited to Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, an infection that is resistant to many antibiotics, and had an order for contact isolation effective 08/03/24. On 01/05/25 at 10:57 AM, observed no signage was posted outside R23's room stating that he was on transmission-based precautions (TBP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to consult with the physician for three residents reviewed when Resident (R) 12 and R26 reported allegations of abuse by staff and R33 was witnessed by a staff being abused by another staff. This deficient practice could affect all residents at the facility and impede care the physician would order. Findings Include: Cross reference F600 - Free From Abuse and Neglect 1) On 07/17/24 at 11:54 AM interviewed ADON who confirmed he was present at R12's bedside with DON when they interviewed her. ADON reported resident stated CNA was rough handling her during her shower. ADON was not sure if it occurred more than once, not sure of the details. ADON reported R12 was afraid but not physically hurt, looked a little upset and concerned. ADON stated R12 was worried that CNA in question would retaliate against her. ADON stated the CNA no longer works at facility, stated she was a contract worker and they canceled the remaining contract. On 07/17/24 during RR of R12's EHR did not find a progress note from the licensed staff stating R12's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by staff. Three residents reviewed, Resident (R) 12 and R26 reported allegations of abuse by staff and R33 was witnessed by a staff being abused by another staff. This deficient practice could affect all residents in the facility, placing the residents at risk of harm, if the facility fails to protect resident's right to be free from abuse by staff. Findings Include: Cross Reference F580 - Notify of Changes (injury/decline/room, Etc.) 1) On 07/17/24 at 10:47 AM interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) 1. Inquired if she was working with R12 on 03/20/24 and she said yes, stated on March 20th it was resident's Care Plan day meeting and during the meeting they discuss with the family any concerns and they (the family member) mentioned R12 had told them that a staff had pushed her head down while she was showering her, that the staff had pushed her head against the wall. Family member was not sure what day this occurred. R12 told the family member that she did not like the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the state agency within two hours of being reported to the Charge Nurse (CN), Nursing Supervisor (NS), or Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Director of Nursing (DON). During the review of two Residents (R) 26 and 33 allegations of abuse were reported to a NS, or ADON and DON. Initial reports submitted by the facility were sent to the state agency two days after the incidents were reported to the CN, NS, or ADON and DON. This deficient practice could affect all residents in the facility who have a reported or witnessed incident of abuse and the facility fails to notify the state agency within two hours. Findings Include: Cross Reference F600 Free From Abuse and Neglect 1) On 07/17/24 at 11:54 AM interviewed ADON for R26's incident that was reported on 03/20/24. ADON stated the resident (R26) did not specify a time the incident occurred and reported that it was her night shift nurse aide that was in question. Inquired when night shift is and ADON stated our night shift is from 11:30 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff on 02/07/24 and 07/05/24 during their second shift (03:00 PM - 11:30 PM) on the skilled nursing unit. The deficient practice puts the residents at risk for harm such as abuse by staff and staff working outside of their scope of practice. Findings Include: Cross Reference F600 - Free From Abuse and Neglect and F726 Competent Nursing Staff On 07/17/24 at 11:54 AM interviewed Associate Director of Nursing (ADON) who was able to provide copies of staffing on 02/07/24. Inquired if ADON was working on 02/07/24 and he confirmed he was. Inquired if he was informed of an RN delegating medication administration to a CNA to pass medication to Resident (R)40 and he stated the Director of Nursing (DON) notified him. Inquired if the facility teaches the nurses to delegate medication pass to the CNA's and he denied this. ADON confirmed he and DON met with the staff (RN3 and CNA5) to discuss their scope of practice and what was allowed and not allowed at the facility. Continuation of interview with ADON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to assure a Registered Nurse (RN) and a Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) practiced within their professional scope of practice. This deficient practice could affect all residents and put them at risk for harm if licensed staff delegate tasks to unlicensed staff such as medication administration, which is outside their scope of practice. Findings Include: On 07/17/24 at 11:54 AM interviewed Associate Director of Nursing (ADON) who was able to provide copies of staffing on 02/07/24. Inquired if ADON was working on 02/07/24 and he confirmed he was. Inquired if he was informed of an RN delegating medication administration to a CNA to pass medication to Resident (R)40 and he stated the Director of Nursing (DON) notified him. Inquired if the facility teaches the nurses to delegate medication pass to the CNA's and he denied this. ADON confirmed he and DON met with the staff (RN3 and CNA5) to discuss their scope of practice and what was allowed and not allowed at the facility. On 07/18/24 at 2:25 PM interviewed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)5…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assure staff accurately documented medication offered to and refused by resident (R)40. This deficient practice could affect all residents who receive medication in the facility if their medication administration is not documented accurately. Findings Include: On 07/18/24 at 03:50 PM interviewed RN3 and inquired if she had asked CNA5 to give R40 her medication and RN3 confirmed this. RN3 stated there was an incident the day before, on 02/06/24, with R40 and per RN3 R40 yelled at her. RN3 stated she did not feel comfortable going into R40's room. Inquired if RN3 asked the other nurse who was working with her to pass the bedtime medication to R40 and RN3 stated The other nurse was busy. Inquired if she asked the Shift Coordinator for help and RN3 denied this. RN3 stated she gave CNA5 the medication cup and she (RN3) stayed at the resident's door as CNA5 offered the medication to R40. Inquired if R40 took the medication the CNA offered and RN3 stated R40 refused the medication. Record review on 07/19/24 of R40's Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to ensure the grievance policy included all the required elements. In addition, the facility was unable to provide documentation that Residents were informed they have the right to file a grievance anonymously and the right to obtain a written decision regarding the grievance. There was lack of documentation of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the care concerns of two Residents (R), R1 and R2. As a result of these deficiencies, there was the potential residents do not know how to file an anonymous complaint and grievance findings may not be adequately communicated to the complainant, resulting in dissatisfaction. Findings include: 1) Review of the facility policy titled Resolution of Patient/Resident grievances, complaints, and concerns, effective date 02/2023 revealed the following: 1. The policy did not include a reasonable timeframe the resident can expect a completed review of the grievance; 2. The policy did not identify the grievance official who was responsible for overseeing the grievance process,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review (RR), the facility failed to revise Care Plans (CP) of two Residents (R)1 and R2, of a sample size of three in a timely manner. The facility did not 1) update R1's CP to include use of the abduction pillow or the skin condition on right forearm, and 2) did not update R2's CP in a timely manner to include parameters for oxygen administration when ordered. As a result of this deficiency, there was the potential the residents may not meet their highest potential of physical and mental well-being. This deficiency had been corrected prior to the survey, and met the criteria for past noncompliance. Findings include: 1) R1 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to Skilled Nursing Facility on 10/28/2023 for rehabilitation services following right hip surgery after sustaining a right hip fracture from a fall at home. She was COVID + on admission. R1's medical history included but not limited to Diabetes mellitus, hypertension, congestive heart failure, Stage 3b chronic kidney disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0623 — widespreadProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide proper notification of transfer/discharge for five of 11 residents sampled for Hospitalization (Residents (R) 9, R37, R71, R89, and R74). Specifically, the facility failed to issue written notification of transfer/discharge to the residents or their representatives and/or failed to send notification of the transfer/discharge to the Office of the State LTC [long-term care] Ombudsman (LTCO). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility who are discharged or transferred. Findings include: 1) Resident (R) 9 is a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of her electronic health records (EHR) on 01/11/24 at 09:30 AM, it was noted that R9 was sent and admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. There was no discharge notification or LTCO notification found in the EHR for this discharge. On 01/11/24 at 09:40 AM, an interview was done with Unit Clerk (UC) 1 in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0625 — widespreadNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure written notification of the facility's bed hold policy was provided to 10 of 11 residents sampled for Hospitalization (Residents (R) 9, R69, R37, R71, R89, R74, R66, R86, R58, and R55). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility who are discharged to an acute care hospital. Findings include: 1) R9 is a [AGE] year-old female originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During a review of her electronic health records (EHR) on 01/11/24 at 09:30 AM, it was noted that R9 was sent and admitted to an acute care hospital on [DATE]. There was no written notification of the Bed Hold Policy found in the EHR for this discharge. On 01/11/24 at 09:40 AM, an interview was done with Unit Clerk (UC)1 in the Conference Room. UC1 reported that she had informed R9's daughter of the Bed Hold Policy and offered it by phone, but the daughter had declined. When asked about documentation of the phone conversation, UC1 responded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on facility policy review and staff interview the facility failed to review it's infection and control program (IPCP) annually which included annually reviewing their facility policies including Infection Control and Prevention and Antibiotic Stewardship, Influenza Quarantine Protocol DON/Medical Director Guide, Influenza Prevention and Control Program, and Pneumococcal Vaccine Administration. The deficient practice could affect the residents and staff at the facility if appropriate guidelines are not included and followed in the facilities' IPCP and policies to guide the care of the residents and provide guidance for staff to follow when using personal protective equipment, assuring proper hand hygiene is being performed and resident care is being monitored to assure outbreaks are caught and controlled to prevent mass outbreaks such as influenza or COVID which could be detrimental to the residents and staffs health. Findings Include: On 01/11/24 at 03:05 PM met with facility Infection Preventionist (IP) and Director of Nursing (DON). DON stated she was attending this meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to inform Resident (R) 55 or their public guardian in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of taking an antipsychotic and antidepressant medication, of treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option she prefers. Findings Include: On 01/11/24 at 05:47 PM, RR of R55's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found her diagnoses include, but are not limited to, dementia in other diseases classified elsewhere, moderate, with psychotic disturbance; depression, unspecified psychosis not due to a substance or known physiological condition. R55 has doctors orders for the following medications: Seroquel oral tablet 50 milligrams (mg) (Quetiapine Fumarate) (antipsychotic) give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for behavioral disturbances. Mirtazapine (antidepressant) oral tablet 15 mg give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for appetite stimulant. During this record review found the resident has an appointed public guardian. On 01/12/24 at 10:16 AM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to update Resident (R) 58's comprehensive care plan to include antidepressant as an intervention for the medication he is receiving to treat his depression, correctly identify R58 is taking a blood thinner (Eliquis) to treat his pulmonary emboli (blood clot in the lung) and discontinue Mirtazapine as an intervention on his care plan for his poor intake when it was discontinued on 10/30/2023. Findings Include: During RR on 01/11/24 at 04:44 PM found R58 had doctor's orders for the following medications: Duloxetine HCL DR (antidepressant) 60 milligrams (mg) give one capsule by mouth one time a day related to depression, unspecified, Eliquis (blood thinner) 5 mg tablet give one tablet by mouth two times a day for PE (pulmonary emboli which is a blood clot in the lung). Also noted resident had a doctor's order discontinuing his Mirtazapine order on 10/30/23. Review of R58's CP found no mention of resident taking an antidepressant to help treat his depression and a care plan was found for Resident at risk for bleeding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to prevent urinary tract infections for one of the residents (Resident (R) 13) in the sample. The deficient practice exposed the resident to contaminants that may cause preventable urinary tract infections. This has the potential to affect all residents with a urinary catheter. Findings include: On 01/09/24 at 08:22 AM, observed R13 lying on bed with head slightly elevated. R13 had a urinary catheter that was connected to a urine collection bag hung on the right side of the bed. The tubing connecting the urinary catheter and the collection bag was touching the floor. At 01:36 PM, R13 was sitting up in her bed with her television on. Observed both catheter tubing and collection bag touching the floor. Asked Registered Nurse (RN) 14 if the tubing and the bag are supposed to be touching the floor. RN14 said, No, I'll move them now so it will not be touching the floor. Review of facility policies titled, Urinary Catheter Care and Guidelines for Care of Urinary Catheterization does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure nurse competency in medication administration and assessing for risk of falls. This deficient practice places the residents at increased risk for medication errors and avoidable falls. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F761 Label/Store Drugs and Biologicals. The facility failed to ensure nurses check for medication expiration dates prior to administering them. 2) Resident (R) 9 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include, but are not limited to, history of syncope (fainting) and collapse, difficulty in walking, muscle weakness, and dementia. On 01/09/24 at 09:09 AM, observed R9 from the hallway outside her room, sleeping in bed. A large bruise was visible to her left cheek/temple/forehead, with a 2x2 gauze above her left eyebrow. During an interview with her family representative (FR) at the bedside on 01/09/24 at 01:29 PM, FR described how her mother had fallen out of her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were labeled, administered, and stored in accordance with professional standards. Proper labeling, safe administration practices, and timely reconciliation of stored medications is necessary to decrease the risk for medication errors. The facility failed to dispose medications after the expiration stated by the manufacturer, an insulin pen stored in the medication cart was not labeled to include the resident's name, medication dosage and route of administration and properly store a resident's medication after declining to take the medication during administration time. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who receive medications. Findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 08:25 AM, observed medication administration with Registered Nurse (RN) 7. As she was preparing medications for Resident (R) 29, observed her prepare a Lisinopril 40mg [milligrams] tablet. Of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store and label food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Residents (R) risk serious complications from foodborne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Unsafe and/or unsanitary food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure for all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 01/09/24 at 08:31 AM, while conducting an initial tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Supervisor (FSS), the state agency (SA) observed a large metal container of approximately nineteen (19) cartons of completely thawed Egg Beaters Original in the walk-in refrigerator. Clearly displayed on the front of each carton are the manufacturer's instructions to KEEP FROZEN. No date was visible anywhere indicating when the products were pulled from the freezer to thaw. When asked about the thawing and labeling process for the product, the FSS stated that it takes 2-3 days to thaw the product from its frozen state, so they pull a case at a time from the freezer. The FSS was unaware…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews the facility failed to designate a registered nurse to serve as the director of nursing (DON) on a full time basis. Findings Include: During the entrance conference on 01/09/23 at 08:12 AM, Patient Care Coordinator (PCC)1 stated the facility currently does not have a DON effective 01/01/23 but the previous DON, Consultant Director of Nursing (CDON), was hired as a consultant. On 01/11/23 at 3:26 PM interview with CDON was done. CDON stated she was supposed to work two days per week, a total of 16 hours a week, as a consultant DON.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to store food that was identifiable and/or had an expiration date and failed to provide a clean area to prepare food. This deficient practice has the potential to infect residents, visitors, and staff, who have meals served to them by the facility's kitchen, with a food-borne illness. Findings include: 1) On 01/09/23 at 08:29 AM, an initial concurrent observation of the facility's kitchen and interview with the Kitchen Manager (KM) were done. The walk-in freezer contained a large metal pan covered with plastic wrap that had unidentifiable slabs of food. No label indicating the food contents or date was found on the plastic wrap. Kitchen staff (KS)15 was queried as to the food contents in the metal pan and KS15 stated that it was baked salmon from a few days ago. KM confirmed that the food contents in the large metal pan should have the name of the food contents and the date of expiry written on the plastic wrap covering the metal pan. 2) On 01/09/23 at 08:40 AM, continued concurrent observation and interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-13 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based upon record review and interview with staff member, the facility failed to assure the facility assessment accurately reflected the resident and staffing ratios needed in the facility to ensure that the staffing resources met the needs of the resident population. The deficient practice affects all residents in the facility to maintain and attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and/or psychosocial well-being. Findings include: A review of the Facility Assessment Tool provided by the facility and approved by the Director of Nursing (DON) and Medical Director on 11/03/22. The assessment did not include nursing resources to meet the acuity of the facility's resident population. The assessment documents the facility is licensed for 187 beds with an average daily census of 160 to 168 residents. A review of the payroll base journal, noted the facility with low weekend staffing for Fiscal Year 2022, first quarter (October to December) and fourth quarter (July to September). On 01/12/23 at 09:33 AM an interview was conducted with the Consultant Director of Nursing (CDON). CDON…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure protective and preventive measures for COVID-19 and other communicable infections. Facility staff did not follow protocols for standard and transmission-based precautions (TBP); did not wear the proper personal protective equipment (PPE); did not thoroughly clean and sanitize shower equipment after use; did not ensure an indwelling catheter tubing was correctly stored, and did not clean hands between glove use. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents, healthcare personnel, and visitors at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 01/09/23 at 09:05 AM, observed room [ROOM NUMBER] with a Droplet Plus sign. The sign described the PPE required for entering the room as: Gown, Gloves, Goggles [or face shield] & N95 mask [respirator] (if available) . At 09:10 AM, observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)8 enter the room without changing out her procedure mask for an N-95 respirator. At 09:19 AM, asked CNA8 about the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-01-13 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespreadPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly conduct COVID-19 testing following the identification of a direct-care staff member and a resident diagnosed with COVID-19 in the facility. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed the residents at an increased risk of COVID-19 transmission. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as well as all healthcare personnel, and visitors at the facility. Findings include: On 01/12/23 at 10:06 AM, an interview was done with the Consultant Director of Nursing (CDON), who also served as the only certified Infection Preventionist for the facility, in room [ROOM NUMBER]. Regarding COVID-19, the CDON reported that the facility had last experienced an outbreak in December of 2022 with outbreak testing beginning on 12/16/22. When asked to describe the facility's process for outbreak testing, the CDON stated that the facility practice was to do broad-based or mass testing (as opposed to contact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide the services necessary to maintain a clean, sanitary, and homelike environment for multiple residents (R) in the sample, as evidenced by a dirty room for R16, multiple rooms on the third floor with part or all of the room numbers missing, and dirty shower equipment in use on the fifth and third floor. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents were placed at risk for a decreased quality of life. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 01/10/23 at 10:00 AM observation of the shower room across room [ROOM NUMBER] found a shower chair with metal framing encrusted with white and black substance. The metal frame under the seat and by the footrest appeared rusted. The commode bucket was observed with a few brown substances adhered to the side of the bowl. The nylon straps attached to the chair were wet. Observation in the shower room across room [ROOM NUMBER] found a shower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff members, the facility did not ensure that the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans were done for three of 27 residents (Residents (R) 86, R55, R83) in the sample. Specifically, a resident identified with significant weight loss for two consecutive months had no care plan to address it. A resident with liver cancer who was admitted to Hospice for end-of-life care had no care plan to manage her pain. Activity care plans were not developed to include person-centered interventions that would engage the resident in meaningful activities. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were placed at risk for a decline in their quality of life, and were prevented from attaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Multiple observations (01/09/23 at 08:58 AM, 09:45 AM, 11:45 AM, 12:35 PM, 3:06 PM; 01/10/23 at 09:05 AM, 12:03 PM, 12:54 PM;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-01-13 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — patternEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the staff was competent in performing quality control (QC) testing for the blood glucose meter. The QC solutions that were used for QC testing expired (as indicated by the manufacturer's expiration date) before the date the vials were opened. QC testing of the glucose meter verifies that precision of residents' glucose test results. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed all residents that need glucose testing at risk for potential harm as their medical care is dependent on precise glucose test results. Finding includes: On [DATE] at 09:40 AM, observed a box of QC solution with two vials inside that had a manufacturer's expiration date of [DATE] in the medication cart. Lot numbers for the vials were: 015921A for the normal level and 100720A for the high level. Handwritten on the box was the open date of [DATE] with a 90-day expiration date of [DATE]. No other box of control solutions were found in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly provide or obtain from their dental consultant, routine dental services to meet the resident's needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 01/09/23 at 09:29 AM, observations were done at the bedside of Resident (R)83. R83 was observed sleeping in her bed and appeared to have no teeth. On 01/10/23 at 09:44 AM, during a review of R83's electronic health record (EHR), it was unclear when her last routine dental exam/assessment had been done. No dental consults or exams were documented although there was a physician order from 10/11/22 that stated, dental consult on admission and annually. On 01/10/23 at 02:20 PM, an interview was done at the third-floor Nurses' Station (NS) with Unit Clerk (UC)3, Registered Nurse (RN)38, and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)1 present. All confirmed that the facility contracted Dentist had not come in to do routine dental exams since the COVID-19 pandemic began in 2020. UC3 reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-01-13 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview with staff members, the administration failed to provide support effectively and efficiently to the facility and staff members to ensure residents attain or maintain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The facility failed to ensure all areas of the facility's Plan of Correction (POC) were corrected and/or worked toward compliance by the corrective action date the facility chose, 02/28/23. Findings include: (Cross-reference to F791 Dental Services) 1) Review of the facility's POC documented for the deficient practice in Dental Services Dental services to be provided by the dental consultant was scheduled for all . residents. The Unit Clerks will schedule annual dental appointments for all . residents and submit the schedule to the Patient Care Coordinator by the 31st of January on an annual basis. The ADON/DON or designee will review and ensure that all . residents are scheduled for dental consults annually. On 03/22/23 at 03:05 PM, conducted concurrent interview and record review (RR) with Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a functioning call system for one Resident (R)260, in a sample of 32 residents. The facility failed to ensure that the visual alerts outside of R260's room and at the nursing station lit when she initiated her call device. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who can utilize their call devices for help due to the lack of processes to identify a broken call system, other than the direct patient care employees, and a lack of follow up on repairs done by their Biomedical department, Findings include: On 01/09/23 at 12:45 PM, an interview was made with R260 and family member (FM)5. During the interview, R260 repeatedly stated she wanted a urinary tube to help drain her bladder because she had difficulty voiding and had urinary urgency. FM5 stated that R260 was newly admitted into the facility, and they were waiting for test results to find out what was the cause of R260's voiding difficulty and urinary urgency. On 01/09/23 at 12:55 PM, after the interview with FM5, an observation was made…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff member, the facility failed to assure one of two residents (R)44 sampled exercised their right to formulate an advanced health care directive (AHCD). This deficient practice has the potential to cause harm to residents when they are provided medical care that is not in accordance with their wishes. Findings include: R44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/10/23 at 08:08 AM reviewed R44's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and health record at the nurse's station for documentation of an AHCD. AHCD was not found. Review of R44's Declaration of Authority to Act as Surrogate for Patient form documented R44's adult child as an Appointed (Non-Designated) Surrogate signed on 03/13/17. Documentation of persons who took part in the selection were not documented. Under additional facts and circumstances to establish claimed authority was not documented. The form defined non-designated surrogate as a selected person .to make health care decisions for a patient has been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to follow the facility's grievance policy to ensure prompt resolution of all grievances for two sampled residents (R)58 and R85. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure (P&P) 5021 RESOLUTION OF PATIENT/RESIDENT/VISITOR GRIEVANCES, COMPLAINTS AND CONCERNS effective 12/2021 defines complaint as a verbal expression of dissatisfaction .regarding care or services which can be resolved at the point which it occurs by the staff present. Most complaints will have simple solutions that can be promptly addressed and are considered resolved when patient/patient's representative is satisfied with the action taken on their behalf. The facility's policy defines grievance as a .formal verbal or written expression of dissatisfaction with some aspect of care or service that has not been resolved to the patient/patient's representative's satisfaction at the point of service. The P&P further documents The complaint, findings and resolution of the complaint shall be communicated by the immediate supervisor or to Risk…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment of functional capacity within fourteen (14) days of admission, for two of 27 residents (R)103 and R83 in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility failed to identify R103's cognitive status which is important in defining care and staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for R83 so that she could meet her highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all newly admitted residents to the facility. Findings include: 1) Reviewed the electronic health record (EHR) of R103 who was admitted on [DATE], and the initial Minimum Data Set (MDS) was completed on 12/21/22. While reviewing the initial MDS, noted that section C of the MDS, which covers cognitive patterns, was not completed. Question 0100 asked, Should Brief Interview for Mental Status (C0200-C0500) be conducted?, the answer was yes. There were no answers for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility did not assure resident assessments were electronically transmitted within 14 days after completion. There was no record of successful transmittals to reflect the discharge for 3 (Residents 96, 88, and 64) of 3 residents identified. Findings include: The Long-Term Care (LTC) software identified three residents that did not have assessments transmitted for over 120 days. Residents (R) 96, R88, and R64. On 01/11/23 at 3:01 PM, record review with concurrent interview was done with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC)1. The MDSC1 reported she started doing the assessments in October 2022. The review found: -R96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/30/22. -R88 was admitted to the facility and readmitted on [DATE]. MDSC1 reported a quarterly assessment was done on 07/16/22. R88 later went out of the facility on 08/07/22 with return on 08/10/22. R88 was discharged on 08/14/22 to acute hospital, therefore, an admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive assessment of functional capacity for two residents (R) in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, resident-specific care areas were not triggered for further evaluation and staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for the residents (R55 and R83) so that they could meet their highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)55 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled care following a physical decline and weakness related to chemotherapy treatment. R55's admitting diagnoses include liver cancer, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and history of breast and colon cancer. On 12/29/22 R55 was admitted to Hospice for end-of-life care. On 01/11/23 at 1:40 PM, a review of R55's electronic health record (EHR) noted that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to identify residents' medical needs and failed to provide caregivers important interventions on the initial care plan to give personalized and effective care to treat these medical needs for two residents (R), R259 and R260, in a sample of two. This deficient practice has the potential for ineffective and unindividualized care to be given to all newly admitted residents. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference to F684 Quality of Care. The facility failed to provide the needed medical care for R259, who has kidney failure, and was not receiving hemodialysis (a life-saving treatment involving a machine to clean the individual's blood of toxins). R259's specialized medical needs were not timely identified by the facility. On 01/10/23 at 08:18 AM, observed R259 sitting up in bed with her bedside table that contained her breakfast tray pushed to the side. R259 was sleepy, but responded to verbal stimulation. R259 requested to have oxygen applied…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was reviewed and/or revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment and as needed for two of 27 residents (Resident (R)91 and R85) sampled. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference to F689- Free from Accident Hazard, F756- Drug Regime Review, and F758- Free from Unnecessary Psychotropic Medication Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #HI00009469 (#9469) in the Aspen Complaints/Incidents Tracking System (ACTS) was investigated. The completed report submitted by the facility documented R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 04/22/22 at approximately 3:45 PM, R91 was observed by staff in bed, quiet, no restlessness and declined an offer to go to the bathroom. At 4:35 PM, staff went back to check on the resident and found her sitting in bed. R91 informed staff that she fell when she went to the bathroom. R91 informed staff that she needed to use the bathroom again, stood up and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the activities of daily living, including grooming and personal hygiene for one resident (Resident 45) in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident (R)45 was hindered from attaining his highest practicable well-being and was placed at risk for a decreased quality of life. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)45 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Admitting diagnoses include high blood pressure, diabetes, depression, and left-sided weakness following a stroke. On 01/09/23 at 09:39 AM, observations were done at R45's bedside. R45 was alert with his hair uncombed and in disarray and he was wearing a facility gown that had a large yellow spill stain that had dried, covering his chest area and extending down to his abdomen. When asked what happened to his gown, R45…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility did not ensure bowel regimen was provided in accordance with the physician's order for Resident (R)40 and the facility failed to appropriately provide the needed medical care for R259, who has kidney failure. R259 has kidney failure and was not yet receiving hemodialysis (a life-saving treatment involving a machine to clean the individual's blood of toxins). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents and residents who have kidney failure but are not yet receiving their life-saving treatment. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include Wernicke's encephalopathy; depression; psychotic disorder; and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Resident interview on 01/09/23 at 10:33 AM, R40 reported she sometimes experiences constipation. Inquired whether the facility provides any treatment. R40 responded a suppository is administered which is effective. Record review done on 01/12/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to provide treatment to prevent or improve pressure ulcers/injury for one Resident (R)259, in a sample of six residents. R259 was at risk to develop pressure ulcers, and due to the lack of timely repositioning, she developing a worsened skin wound. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the health of residents in the facility who are dependent on the staff for positioning. Findings include: On 01/09/23 at 10:27 AM, an initial observation was made of R259 who laid in bed with her eyes closed, lying on her right side. R259 did not arouse to verbal stimulation. On 01/09/23 at 1:13 PM, observed R259 lying in the same position in bed with her eyes closed and she still did not arouse to verbal stimulation. On 01/10/23 at 2:05 PM, interviewed R259's family member (FM)12. FM12 stated that the staff do not turn R259 while lying in bed every two hours. On 01/12/23 at 10:00 AM, a concurrent observation and interview were done with Registered Nurse (RN)10 during R259's pressure ulcer dressing change on her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remains free of accident hazards for one resident (Resident (R)91) sampled. Findings include: Cross Reference to F657- Care Plan Revision, F756- Drug Regime Review, and F758- Free from Unnecessary Psychotropic Medication On 01/09/23 at 08:45 AM, conducted an initial observation of R91 in the resident's assigned room. R91 was resting on an air mattress and the resident's feet was positioned higher than her head. A wedged cushion was placed under the left side of the air mattress and aligned with the area of the resident's legs. As a result of the wedge cushion under the mattress, R91's feet (heels in contact with the bed) pointed toward the right side of the bed. On the left side of the mattress, wedge cushions were placed under the sheet starting from the bedrail down to the foot of the bed. As a result of placing the wedge cushions under the sheet, the resident's sheet did not properly fit the mattress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews the facility failed to ensure a resident (Resident (R) 85) with an indwelling catheter was removed as soon as possible after a successful void trial. The facility failed to ensure R85 received appropriate interventions to restore as much urinary function as possible without use of a catheter and education on implications and risks associated with the use of a catheter without an indication for continued use. As a result, all residents are at risk of unnecessary use of indwelling catheters. Findings include: Cross Reference to F657. The facility failed to revise R85's care plan to address education to be provided on risks associated with the use of a catheter without an indication for continued use and include interventions to restore as much urinary function as possible without the use of catheter. R85 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but not limited to gastrointestinal hemorrhage and benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview with staff members, the facility failed to assure two Residents (R)72 and R83 of two residents sampled, maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status as evidenced by significant weight loss. As a result of these deficient practices, the facility placed this resident at risk for avoidable declines and injuries. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) R72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute hospital. Diagnoses includes but not limited to dementia with behavioral disturbance, myocardial infarction, chronic kidney disease, and Type 1 diabetes mellitus. On 01/10/23 at 10:20 AM, record review noted on 11/29/22, R72 weighed 125.4 lbs. and on 12/23/22, the resident weighed 116 pounds indicative of a 7.5% weight loss. A comparison of subsequent weights noted on 11/29/2022, the R72 weighed 125.4 lbs. and on 12/25/2022, the resident weighed 119 pounds which is indicative of a 5.10 %…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview with staff member, the facility did not ensure enteral formula for two Residents (R)5 and R81, of two residents sampled, receiving enteral nutrition (also known as tube feeding, a way of delivering nutrition directly to the stomach or small intestine) did not exceed the expiration date. Findings include: 1) On 01/09/23 at 09:21 AM, conducted an observation of Resident (R)5 lying in bed and a bottle of Jevity tube feeding (TF) formula hanging with 400 milliliters (ml) left. The label on the Jevity bottle documented that bottle of TF formula was started on 01/08/23 at 05:00 AM, administration instructions for the formula was a bolus of 180 ml/hr (hour), and a beyond use date of 01/09 at 05:00 AM. At 10:25 AM, the same bottle was actively infusing and the infusion pump display documented 272 ml of formula had been administered to the resident. On 01/10/23 at 09:15 AM, conducted an interview with Nursing Staff (NS)22 regarding R5's TF formula. This surveyor shared…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent and manage pain adequately for one resident Resident (R)55, in the sample. Specifically, the facility failed to recognize and act upon indicators of unmanaged pain, failed to evaluate, or assess what (R)55's pain management goals were, and failed to develop a resident-centered care plan for pain management. As a result of this deficient practice, R55 was prevented from attaining or maintaining her highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: Cross-reference to F641 Accuracy of Assessments. The facility failed to accurately complete a comprehensive assessment that included an assessment of pain. As a result of this deficient practice, resident-specific care areas were not triggered for further evaluation and staff did not have the information necessary to adequately manage R55's pain. R55 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled care following a physical decline and weakness related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-13 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents, a family member, and a staff member the facility did not ensure enough nursing staff is provided to respond to each resident's basic needs. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F584. The facility did not assure residents on the third and fifth floor were provided with clean and safe shower equipment. Cross reference to F880. The facility failed to thoroughly clean and sanitize shower equipment after use for the third and fifth floors. On 01/09/23 at 2:51 PM interview with Resident (R)9's family member (FM)1 was done. FM1 reported the Certified Nursing Aides (CNA) are short-staffed. FM1 stated F9 needs less care than she did before because she is in hospice but when she needed more care, FM1 would physically sanitize and wash the facility's shower chair because they were filthy with mildew and mold. FM1 reported the CNAs are busy and short-staffed that they don't have time to clean and maintain the shower chairs after resident use. FM1 stated she used to come to the facility four times a week to assist feed F9 and provide other care R9 may need…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who use psychotropic drugs are not given these drugs unless the medication is necessary to treat a specific condition as diagnosed and documented in the clinical record, receives gradual dose reductions (GDR) unless clinically contraindicated and documented in the clinical record for one of five (Resident (R)91) residents sampled. Findings include: Cross Reference to F657- Care Plan Revision, F689- Free from Accident Hazard, and F756- Drug Regimen Review On 01/09/23 at 3:11 PM, conducted a record review of R91's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) that documented R91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included Alzheimer's disease, dementia with behavioral disturbances, diabetes mellitus type 2, and hypertension. Review of the R91's physician orders documented an order for Mirtazapine 7.5 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for sleep disturbances (ordered on 07/18/22). Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-01-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure documentation that all residents who were eligible for the pneumococcal vaccine were offered or received it. Coupled with advanced age and chronic conditions, this deficient practice made one out of the five residents sampled potentially vulnerable to the bacteria that causes pneumonia. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: On 01/10/23 at 10:25 AM, a review of Resident (R)95's electronic health record (EHR) was done. Documentation of his pneumococcal vaccination status could not be found in his immunization record or progress notes. On 01/11/23 at 3:10 PM, during a review of immunization records provided by the facility, it was noted that Resident (R)95 had no documentation on whether he had been offered or received his pneumococcal vaccination. On 01/12/22 at 3:00 PM, an interview was done with the Consultant Director of Nursing (CDON) in the first-floor Conference Room. The CDON stated that after looking further into it, she had found that R95 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$98,421 in federal fines across 3 penalties.
- $15,185 — penalty dated 2026-06-12
- $52,781 — penalty dated 2025-01-08
- $30,455 — penalty dated 2024-02-29
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUAKINI HEALTH SYSTEM | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/07/1983 |
| OISHI, GREGG | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; TRUSTEE OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2024 |
| AI, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 01/01/2014 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
What families pay in HI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125026. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.