Liliha Healthcare Center
1814 Liliha Street, Honolulu, HI 96817 · For profit - Corporation · 92 certified beds · (808) 537-9557 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (26% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 21.4% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 2.4% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.7% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.9% | 1.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 6.4% | 1.9% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.4% | 20.4% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.8% | 9.1% | 18.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 3.4% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 17.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.7% | 11.9% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.9% | 84.7% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 22.3% | 19.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.6% | 10.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.17 | 1.09 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.35 | 0.88 | 1.80 | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 63 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 35.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 28 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.18 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.8%CMS range 45.6–71.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 8.0–16.6 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 35.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 25.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.1% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.1% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 2.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 5.6% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.8%CMS range 4.9–13.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.85 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 92 beds and averages 68.5 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.72 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.45 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.93 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.68 to 0.89 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2023-02-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (R)33 from physical harm. R33 was totally dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL's), including repositioning every two hours. R33 suffered an unwitnessed and unexplainable injury due to the manner in which her care was provided. As a result, R33 suffered a dislocated left (L) shoulder and pain, which affected her ability to achieve and maintain her highest level of physical well being. All residents dependent on staff are at risk of this type of unintentional abuse if they are not handled in a safe, secure manner to prevent injury. Findings include: 1) The Office of Healthcare Assurance received an initial facility incident report (FRI) regarding the injury on 12/13/2022 and the completed report on 12/20/2022 (date recorded as 2020 in error). The type of incident was marked injuries of unknown source. The FRI included It was noted during breakfast that her L shoulder was swollen and warm to touch.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out acitvities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for two of four residents (Resident (R)37 and R3) sampled. R37 unable to perform ADLs due to diagnosis of hemoplegia, hemiparesis, progressing Dementia and is dependent on staff for all ADLs needs. Observations on 02/07/23 through 02/10/23 documented R37's ADLs were not completed, appeared increasingly unkept, lips progressed to crack, and body odor was pungent. R3 is dependent on staff for oral hygiene did not receive lip care for dry lips. As a result of severity in the neglect of R37's ADLs, any reasonable person would experience psychosocial harm. Findings include: Cross reference to F656 Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan 1) Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Appendix P, Seiction IV, E, Psychosocial Outcome Severity Guide, October 2022, defines the resonable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and document review, the facility did not have a process in place to maintain documentation of grievances. Six out of the six grievances sampled, did not meet the documentation requirements for the grievance decision. In addition the facility did not follow their own policy. As a result of this deficient practice, it is unknown what action had been taken, and if Residents/Representatives were satisfied with the outcome. Findings include: 1) Reviewed the facility policy titled Resident and Family Grievance, revised date 01/2025. The policy included: 1. The Administrator has been designated as the Grievance Official . 2. The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process, receiving and tracking grievances though the conclusion .; Issuing written grievance decisions to the resident; . 3. The Social Services Director, in coordination with the Grievance Official, is responsible for conducting any necessary investigations by the facility, ensuring the facility's grievance form is completed for any grievance filed; conducting correspondence with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to have a process in place to ensure resident repositioning to prevent pressure ulcers (damage to the skin with open wound as a result of prolonged pressure). The facility did not have evidence that three of three Residents(R)1, R2 and R6 that were at risk for pressure ulcers, and who required assistance for bed mobility, were repositioned to prevent pressure ulcers. There was not a schedule/regimen for staff to follow and process to document the task. As a result of this deficient practice there is a higher risk residents will develop a pressure ulcer (PU). Findings include: 1) R1 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnosis list included functional quadriplegia, hemiplegia (weakness or paralysis) and hemiparesis (severe or complete loss) affecting left dominant side, following a stroke. She was incontinent of bowel and bladder and required assist of one staff for bed mobility. Reviewed R1's care plan (CP),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide evidence that an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for one Resident (R)3 of a sample size of three reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice potentially compromised the protection and safety of all residents on the unit where R3 resided. Findings include: On 02/24/2025 at 07:05 PM, the State Agency (SA) received a facility-reported incident (FRI) for ASPEN Complaints/Incidents Tracking System (ACTS) #11520, documenting an allegation of staff-to-resident abuse by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)12 to R3. On 06/05/2025, the SA entered the facility to investigate the allegation. On 06/05/2025, the facility provided a copy of the 02/24/2025 Nurse staff schedule for the second-floor unit which revealed four CNAs (including CNA12) and two Registered Nurses (RN) working at the time the incident allegedly occurred (day shift). On 06/05/2025 at 11:30 AM, a review of the facility's investigation packet revealed that the facility obtained information from CNA12. There was no evidence provided to indicate the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and medical record review, the facility failed to make timely revisions to two resident's (R)1 and R2's Comprehensive Care Plans (CP) of a sample size of six. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have all the information necessary to effectively address the resident's status, condition, and/or needs adequately so that they could meet their highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) R1 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her medical history included but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke affecting the left side, dysphasia (difficulty swallowing), dementia, Type 2 diabetes, and anemia. R1 was incontinent of bowel and bladder and had a feeding tube (tube placed in stomach) for long term nutritional support. She required one person assist with bed mobility. On 06/09/2025 at 12:00 PM, observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record and document review, the facility failed to provide the standard of nursing care to one Resident (R)6 of a sample size of three. Specifically, when R6 was diagnosed with COVID infection, the nursing staff failed to consistently monitor all vitals signs, which would include temperature (T), blood pressure (BP), pulse rate (P), respiration rate (R), and pulse oximetry (O2% - measures oxygen in blood). As a result of this deficient practice, there was a higher risk that changes in condition may be missed. Findings include: 1) R6 was an [AGE] year old female long term resident at the facility. Her medical history included advanced dementia, breast cancer, Type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder and hypertension. R6 had dysphasia, which affected her ability to communicate and at baseline, she was not alert or oriented. On 03/30/2025 she was diagnosed with COVID infection, and placed in isolation until 04/08/2025. On 04/10/2025, R6 was transferred to the hospital for a higher…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review of facility assessment, the facility did not fulfill the requirement to designate a registered nurse as the Director of Nursing (DON). As a result of this deficiency, there was risk of negative impact on quality of care and outcomes. Findings include: Cross-reference to F868 Quality Assessment and Assurance. During staff interview on 01/27/25 at 08:20 AM, Administrator (Admin) said that there was no DON and that the facility was currently looking for one. During Quality Assurance Performance Improvement review on 01/31/25 at 01:35 PM, Admin further said that the previous DON left a few months ago and that currently other staff were covering some of the duties and responsibilities of that position. Review of Facility Assessment read the following: Purpose, the purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. This assessment is to be used to make decisions about direct care staff needs, as well as capabilities to provide services to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-31 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and review Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) program, the facility did not fulfill the requirement to have Director of Nursing (DON) participation on the Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee. As a result of this deficiency, there was risk of negative impact on coordination and evaluation activities under the QAPI program. Findings include: Cross-reference to F727 Registered Nurse, DON. During staff interview on 01/27/25 at 08:20 AM, Administrator (Admin) said that there was no DON and that the facility was currently looking for one. During Quality Assurance Performance Improvement review on 01/31/25 at 01:35 PM, Admin further said that the previous DON left a few months ago and that currently other staff were covering some of the duties and responsibilities of that position. Review of the QAPI meeting minutes for the past two months did not show a DON present. Review of Facility Assessment read the following: Purpose, the purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure cooked and stored food were properly labeled in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and failed to ensure bottles of sauce were labeled with the manufacturer's expiration date for one of one kitchen observed. Failure to appropriately label cooked and stored food has the potential to affect residents that receive food from the kitchen, and visitors and staff who have meals served by the facility, placing them at risk for serious complications from foodborne illness. Findings include: On 01/28/25 at 08:05 AM, during interview and observation of the kitchen with Dietary [NAME] (DC) 1, observed a container of cooked white rice, confirmed by DC1, in a small refrigerator without a label identifying the food item or preparation and discard date. DC1 reported the rice was prepared this morning and a label should have been created with today's date and a discard date. Further observed in the dry food storage room, multiple unopened bottles of Browning and Seasoning Sauce with a yellow…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on resident interview and policy review, the facility failed to treat one Residents (R) 10 of eight residents sampled, with respect and dignity. As a result of this deficiency, R10 felt the right to a dignified existence was violated. Findings include: Resident interview on 01/29/25 at 12:30 PM, R10 said there were many times where staff were speaking in their native language (not English) and R10 felt staff were talking about him/her. Review of policy on Resident Rights read Policy; The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility . Resident rights; The resident has the right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and communication with and access to persons and services inside and outside the facility .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, family interview, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to maintain a clean environment as evidenced by noted stains, spots on the cloth napkins. As a result of this deficiency, the facility increased the risk for spread of disease-causing organisms. Findings include: During family interview on 01/27/25 at 10:05 AM, said they saw numerous stains, spots on the cloth napkins that came with the meal trays. Observation of the breakfast trays on 01/28/25 at 07:30 AM, revealed several cloth napkins with spot stains and smudge stains. Staff interview on 01/28/25 at 01:50 PM, Dietary Manager looked at all the stored cloth napkins and acknowledged several with spots, stains as previously described. Review of facility policy on Safe and Homelike Environment read; Policy, In accordance with residents' rights, the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, allowing the resident to use his or her personal belongings to the extent possible . Sanitary, includes but is not limited to, preventing the spread of disease-causing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from any physical restraint imposed for purposes of convenience, for one of one sampled residents (Resident (R) 5) for restraints. This deficient practice placed R5 at risk for physical harm and has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: During a Facilty Reported Incident (FRI) investigation, interview was conducted on 01/30/25 with Unit Manager (UM) 2. UM2 stated that Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 10 approached her on 12/31/24. CNA10 had informed her that while providing personal care, R5 was resisting care by pushing down with her hands. CNA10 decided to wrap R5's hands with the lower portion of her gown so that CNA10 can finish changing her incontinence brief. Interview was conducted on 01/31/25 at 09:35 AM with the Administrator. The Administrator stated that during an investigation interview, CNA10 had mentioned wrapping up R5's hands with the lower portion of her gown. CNA10 confirmed that R5 continued to push her hands down while it was wrapped and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to provide written notice of discharge for one Resident (R)76 out of two residents sampled. As a result of this deficiency, there was a potential for miscommunication. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated that R76 was discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Further review did not show any written notice of discharge to the resident and/or representative. During staff interview on 10/31/25 at 11:00 AM, Social Services Director acknowledged that the facility did not provide written notification of discharge on [DATE]. Review of facility policy on Transfer and Discharge (including AMA) read; Policy, It is the policy of this facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not initiate transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility, except in limited circumstances . Emergency Transfers/Discharges, initiated by the facility for medical reasons to an acute care setting such as a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-31 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of records and staff interviews, three of ten staff sampled for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) competency were not properly trained to provide basic life support subject to accepted professional guidelines. This deficient practice could result in the facility not providing the necessary care, placing residents at risk for decline in health status and/or death. Findings Include: A review of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) documentation for three staff was done on [DATE] at 11:15 AM. Documentation for Registered Nurse (RN) 11, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 12 and CNA13 reflects training from an online training course that does not provide hands-on practice and in-person skills assessment. Interviewed the Administrator on [DATE] at 11:49 AM, in his office, regarding CPR requirements for the facility. Administrator stated there is nothing in writing for CPR training requirements. Administrator stated on [DATE] at 11:59 AM that he spoke to the Infection Preventionist (IP), who provided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one resident sampled (Resident (R) 22) for elopement, received adequate supervision to prevent accidents when he was an elopement risk. As a result of this deficient practice, R22 left the facility without authorization. This put R22 at risk of injury or getting hit by a car at a busy street. Findings include: R22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, but not limited to, pyogenic arthritis, muscle weakness, difficulty in walking, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, anxiety, depression, cognitive communication deficit, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Review of R22's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date of 12/16/24 found R22's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score a 15 (cognitively intact). In Section GG. Functional Abilities and Goals, mobility devices used were cane/crutch and wheelchair. Further documented R22 needed supervision or touching assistance when walking…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in a locked compartment for one out of four medication carts. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and to decrease the risk for diversion of residents' medications. Findings Include: Concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 10 were conducted on 01/28/25 at 01:46 PM on the second-floor hallway. One of the medication carts was left unlocked and two staff members were observed passing the unlocked cart. A few minutes later RN10 returned to the medication cart and locked it. RN10 then confirmed that the medication cart should have been locked and secured when left unattended. Interview was conducted with Unit Manager (UM) 2 on the second floor. UM2 confirmed that unattended carts should be locked and secured. A review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage, with a revised date of 06/01/23 was conducted. The policy documented, All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a clean working area before initiating wound care for one of one sampled resident (Resident (R) 35) for wounds. This failed practice has the potential to place a resident at risk for the development of infection and has the potential to affect all the residents that require dressing changes. Findings Include: Observation was conducted on 01/29/25 at 10:13 AM in R35's room during wound care rounds. R35 was turned to her side in bed and noted to have bowel movement on her buttocks, extending to the bottom edge of the resident's dressing located over her sacral area. Physician Assistant (PA) 1 proceeded to remove the dressing to the sacral area, and assessed the wound area before the bowel movement of R35 was cleaned, and before a clean brief was placed under the resident. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 11 proceeded to clean the bowel movement after PA1 was done with the wound assessment. Interviewed the Infection Preventionist (IP) on 01/29/25 at 12:50 PM at the second-floor nurse's station. IP confirmed that the CNA…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff members, the facility did not ensure that the development and implementation of comprehensive person-centered care plans were done for 3 of 25 residents (Residents 33, 60 and 139) in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents were placed at risk for a decline in their quality of life, and were prevented from attaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Cross-reference to F688 Increase/Prevent Decrease in ROM/Mobility. Despite identifying positioning/mobility needs for Resident (R)33, the facility failed to develop a care plan to effectively address those needs. 2) During interview with R60 on 01/23/2024, R60 expressed a desire to mobilize more with the Hemi-Walker available to R60. R60 feels confident this could be achieved if staff walked him daily. R60 had a care plan in place for altered ADL function, with an approach/intervention stating uses…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-26 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations the facility failed to provide a comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public by not maintaining the environment in good repair. Findings include: Observations on 01/23/2024 - 01/26/2024, showed wallpaper on upper half of walls in the hallway of 1st floor, is lifting off in several areas and curling over. Outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] there is patch of wallpaper missing, approximately 12 x 18. It appears this patch has been torn off. On the opposite wall a picture has been removed with the area underneath significantly lighter in color than the rest of the wallpaper, providing an appearance of unkept cleaning of walls. The disrepair of the state of the wallpaper, is unkept and not conducive to a homelike environment. Watermarks are apparent on several areas of the wallpapered area of the hallway on the 1st floor unit.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interviews and policy review, the facility failed to treat two Residents (R) 9 and R139, 68 of eight residents sampled, with respect and dignity. Findings include: Resident interview on 01/23/24 at 01:30 PM, R68 said that Staff would respond to the call bell and say they would be back but not return until several hours later. R68 said that this made him/her feel ignored. Resident interview on 01/24/24 at 08:45 AM, R9 revealed the following: Staff would respond to the call bell and say they would be back but it would take several hours for them to return, Staff would ignore and not pass on a request to speak to the doctor or other person, Staff would speak to each other in a language other than English and it felt as if they were talking about him/her. Review of policy on Resident Rights read Policy; The facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, in a language that the resident understands, of his or her rights and all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay in the facility . Resident rights; The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 residents sampled (Residents 33 and 55) were informed of their right to develop an advance health care directive, aided in doing so, and/or was periodically reassessed in his/her decision-making capacity to do such. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents were placed at risk of not having their wishes honored for future health care decisions, should they become incapacitated. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) On 01/24/24 at 11:23 AM, during a review of Resident (R)33's electronic health record (EHR), an advance health care directive (AHCD) was not found. A review of the social services progress notes revealed no mention of an AHCD. The documentation was requested from the facility. On 01/25/24 at 02:22 PM, an interview with the Social Services Director (SSD) was done in his office. The SSD confirmed that R33 was admitted to the facility in August of 2023, and that there was no documentation available indicating that R33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)33 received the appropriate treatment, equipment, and/or services to increase or prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM) of her neck/head. As a result of this deficient practice, R33 was hindered from reaching her highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility with ROM deficits. Findings include: Resident (R)33 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R33's diagnoses include but are not limited to left-sided hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body) and hemiparesis (muscle weakness) following a stroke, anarthria (complete loss of speech), and gastrostomy status (a surgical opening into the stomach made for a feeding tube). A review of R33's most recent Occupational Therapy (OT) Discharge Summary on 04/19/23 notes a discharge impairment of 100% . This score indicates that she [R33] requires 27…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents in the sample (Resident 52) was free from accidents hazards. Resident (R)52 was observed ambulating with slippers oversized for her feet, placing her at increased risk for an avoidable fall. Despite previously being identified as a high risk for falls, the facility failed to recognize R52's oversized footwear as a potential hazard until pointed out by the State Agency (SA). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all ambulating residents at the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)52 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Her current diagnoses include but are not limited to dementia, difficulty in walking, history of syncope (fainting) and collapse, and restlessness and agitation. On 01/23/24 at 10:53 AM, observed R52 sitting in the second-floor dining room at activities. Noted a bright yellow Falls Risk identification bracelet around her right ankle, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure nurse competency in pain assessment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 64) sampled for pain management. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident (R)64 remained on a narcotic with a high risk of addiction and dependence for pain that could potentially have been managed with non-narcotic medication. This deficient practice placed R64 at risk for avoidable addiction and dependence in addition to other adverse effects of taking Fentanyl, and has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility receiving narcotic pain medication. Findings include: Resident (R)64 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her current diagnoses include but are not limited to Alzheimer's disease, muscle weakness, an almost healed sacral pressure ulcer (pressure sore on the lower back), and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. A review of her electronic health record (EHR) noted that R64's primary language is Cantonese,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide or obtain from their dental consultant, routine dental services to meet the resident's needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)27 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. During an interview with her family representative (FR)5 on 01/23/24 at 01:34 PM at her bedside, FR5 reported that R27 had not received any routine dental visits since her admission. On 01/25/24 at 10:20 AM, a review of R27's electronic health record (EHR) found no documentation of any dental visits or exams since admission. On 01/25/24 at 11:15 AM, an interview was done with Unit Manager (UM)3 in her office. When asked, UM3 reported that the facility dentist had not been in for routine or emergency dental services since COVID began in 2020. UM3 confirmed that for dental emergencies, residents were sent out to his office, but that routine dental services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-14 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed ensure to post the most recent survey conducted by State surveyors in a place readily assessable to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. Findings include: 1) On 02/08/23 at 03:17 PM, this surveyor inspected the second-floor nursing unit and was unable to locate the most recent survey results conducted by the State surveyors. Inquired with Unit Manager (UM)1 where the results were located. UM1 stated that if the survey results were available, it would be located in the designated box on the outside of the nursing station. UM2 walked to a medication cart, moved the medication cart and pointed out the survey result box. UM1 confirmed that there were no survey results located in the box and if the results were in the box, residents and resident representatives would not be able to see the results because the medication cart blocked the entire result's box. At 03:20 PM, this surveyor inspected the first-floor unit and was unable to locate the most recent State surveyor's results. Inquired with Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and interviews the facility failed to provide sufficient dietary staff to safely and effectively carry out the functions of food and nutrition services. As A result of this deficiency, there is the potential for more than minimal harm. Findings include: 1) On 02/13/23 at 01:54 PM, Resident (R)28's Family Member (FM)1 reported she was frustrated because breakfast and lunch has frequently arrived to the dining area late. FM1 reported dinner sometimes comes early and sometimes comes late. FM1 also reported the lunch today just came at 01:50 PM, and R28 is a diabetic and it is important for R28 to eat timely, so her blood sugar does not drop. 2) On 02/07/23 at 12:47 PM, observed broccoli and green beans served to R14 and R53 at bedside for lunch was not cut into half-inch pieces. Both meal tickets taped to meal trays stated that food consistency is chopped. On 02/08/23 at 08:29 AM, observed cranberry juice served to R53 at bedside for breakfast was not thickened. Meal ticket taped to R53's meal tray stated that liquids be nectar thick consistency. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-02-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — widespreadEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide nourishing snacks at bedtime, for meals more than 14 hours between a substantial evening meal and breakfast the following day. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure Dietary Services documents Three meals plus a bedtime snack shall be serves at regular intervals with no more than 14 hours between dinner and breakfast. 1) During a group interview with resident council members (Resident (R) 47, R26, R58, R50) on 02/09/23 at 10:09 AM, R58 reported and R26, R47, and R50 concurred, the residents eat dinner at 05:30 PM and breakfast comes late at 08:30 AM and they have not received a snack in between for about a month. The facility will sometimes offer soda crackers or graham crackers, but it is not enough. R58 stated they used to serve sandwiches but that has stopped and reported starting Tuesday or Wednesday they were provided sandwiches again but believe it is because surveyors are here. On 02/13/23 at 10:20 AM, conducted an interview with Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) 6. CNA6 stated she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
2) During lunch dining observation on 02/08/23 at 12:43 PM, observed 11 of 15 residents on the second-floor dining room with meal trays underneath residents plates, bowls, and cups while eating and not removed. During the meal pass, observed one Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) remove the trays as he was passing meals to four residents. During dining observation on the second floor on 02/08/23 at 12:44 PM observed nine residents eat lunch with their meal trays not removed. Based on observations and interview with staff member, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for residents receiving meal service in the first and second floor dining room. The facility failed to remove trays when passing meals to residents. As a result of this deficiency, resident is at risk of a negative psychosocial outcome. Findings include: 1) On 02/07/20 at 12:18 PM, observed 12 residents in the first-floor dining room. 11 of the 12 residents had their meals and beverages remain on the meal trays until they were done eating lunch. On 02/13/23 at 02:33 PM, interviewed Administrator. She confirmed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-02-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receive foods in the appropriate form as prescribed by a physician for 2 of 2 residents (Resident (R)28 and R14). As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure Dietary Services documents All diets shall be meet the nutrient, texture, and fluid needs of each resident. 1) R28 was admitted to the facility with hospice on 12/05/22 with diagnoses that include Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and Parkinson's disease. Review of R28's comprehensive person-centered care plan documented .Provide diet as ordered: Regular diet, chopped texture and thin liquids . Review of R26's dietary order documented Chopped texture was prescribed. On 02/07/23 at 12:34 PM, observed R28 in the dining room, eating lunch, with her personal caregiver (PCG). The mixed vegetables on R28's lunch plate included pieces of whole broccoli and green beans…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff members the facility failed to ensure three of 21 residents sampled exercised their right to a dignified existence. Resident (R) 60 and R45 were not provided privacy when receiving care requiring them to lift their shirt and a staff member was standing over R21 and R53 while providing assistance during breakfast. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure Promoting/Maintaining Resident Dignity reviewed/revised 05/20/22 documents It is the practice of this facility to protect and promote resident rights and treat each resident with respect and dignity as well as are for each resident in a manner and in an enviroment, that maintains or enhances resident's quality of life by recognizing each resident's individuality. The policy's compliance guidelines include 1. All staff members are involved in providing care to residents to promote and maintain resident dignity and respect resident rights .5. When interacting with a resident, pay attention to the resident as an individual .12. Maintain resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility failed to inform three of five residents (Resident (R) 58, R7, and R74) reviewed for unnecessary medications, the risks and benefits of the use of psychotropic drugs and obtain consent. As a result of this deficiency, residents are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: 1) R58 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of depression and anxiety disorder. Review of R58's physician orders document R58 was receiving the following psychotropic medications; diazepam 5 milligrams (mg) twice a day as needed for anxiety and mirtazapine 15 mg once a day for depression. Review of R58's Electronic Health Record (EHR), consent for use of psychotropic medications including the risk and benefits were not found. On 02/09/23 at 12:29 PM, interview with Regional Nurse and Infection Preventionist (IP) was done. Regional Nurse confirmed the facility did not obtain consent for the psychotropic medications and was not able to find any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to report two reportable events of suspected resident (R) abuse events to the State Agency (SA) Adult Protective Services (APS) as mandated by law. On 12/13/23 the facility identified R33 had an unobserved/unexplained dislocation of the left shoulder. On 10/28/22, R10 was allegedly abused by R7. As a result of this deficient practice the SA did not have information to determine if an investigation by their agency was needed, and there is the potential incidents are not thoroughly investigated, putting all residents of potential abuse at risk. Findings include: 1) The facility provided a policy titled Resident Rights-Freedom from abuse, neglect and exploitation last revised 04/11/2018. Review of the policy included: - Policy header had a different (sister) facility (F2) name on it. - Section Procedure for Investigation of allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment: An investigation is immediately conducted when there are allegations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the unobserved/unexplained injury of R33, diagnosed as a dislocated shoulder. In addition there was lack of evidence administration was involved as necessary in the investigation. If thorough investigations are not completed and appropriate action taken, it increases the risk of reoccurrence of a similar event to residents who are totally dependant on staff for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's). Findings include: 1) R33 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She has hemiplegia (paralysis one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body) and dysphasia (swallowing disorder) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting her left non-dominant side. In addition her diagnosis included, but not limited to dementia, mood disturbance, sacral stage 3 pressure ulcer and age related osteoporosis without pathological fractures. R33 was totally dependent on staff for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the family or resident representative of one resident's (R), R39's, transfer to the hospital. The facility failed to provide a written notification to the resident's close contacts about R39's transfer out of the facility for emergent care. This deficient practice does not protect the resident from an inappropriate discharge and has the potential to affect all residents transferred out of the facility. Finding includes: On 02/07/23 at 08:47 AM, R39 was observed to be lying in bed in his room. R39 did not respond to verbal stimulation. On 02/08/23 at 11:30 AM, R39 was observed to be assessed by an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT). Record review revealed that R39 was transferred to a local area hospital for acute care. Nurse (N)12 tried notifying R39's close contacts but was unable to reach them via phone and was unable to leave a voicemail. On 02/13/23 at 2:22 PM, queried the Area admission Director (AAD). AAD stated that the Social Services Director (SSD) is responsible for notifying the family and Long Term Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure one residents (R)33 functional ability and required staff support was accurately documented on the MDS (Minimal Data Sheet) dated 12/20/2022. In addition two of four weekly (from 01/14/2023 to 02/02/2023) assessments did not accurately reflect R33's need for two staff support for activities of daily living (ADL's). As a result of this deficiency, R33 may not have received the necessary support to meet her goals. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: 1) R33 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She has hemiplegia (paralysis one side of the body), hemiparesis (weakness or the inability to move on one side of the body), dysphasia (swallowing disorder) and dsyarthria (speech disorder caused by muscle weakness) following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting her left non-dominant side. In addition her diagnosis included, but not limited to dementia, stage 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3) R38 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses that include traumatic subdural hemorrhage (bleeding in the area between the brain and the skull) and dementia with agitation. Observation on 02/07/23 at 09:10 AM, R38 was awake lying on specialty mattress, face appeared oily and started yelling in Korean and waving his arms when we knocked on door to ask permission to enter room. According to another surveyor that understands Korean, R38 was using curse words. On 02/08/23 at 12:48 PM, this surveyor knocked on door to ask permission to enter room, no response from R38. As soon as he saw us approach his bed, he started yelling in Korean so we exited the room. Interview with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 6 and Nurse (N) 11 on 02/09/23 at 12:52 PM. CNA6 said R38 yells a lot when the staff care for him, he sometimes refuses care. He only speaks Korean, and the staff sometimes use Google Translate on their phones to communicate with him. The staff understand some common words like change and turn. N11…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to revise two Resident (R)33 and R58's care plans (CP) in a timely manner. Specifically the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 58's comprehensive CP plan was person-centered and does not include safe approaches for smoking, expressing the facility's current designated smoking area is unsafe and prefers to smoke at a non-designated smoking area. R33's CP was not revised in a timely manner after it was determined she needed more staff assist for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F689. The facility failed to identify and assess hazards and risks for Resident (R) 58's smoking environment, designated by the facility and non-designated by the facility, and implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks. On 02/07/23 at 01:46 PM interview with R58 was done. R58 stated the facility's designated smoking area is at the back of the facility and is difficult to access. R58 stated she smokes on the side walk once or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interviews the facility failed to identify and assess hazards and risks for Resident (R) 58's smoking enviroment, designated by the facility and non-designated by the facility, and implement interventions to reduce hazards and risks. This deficient practice effects R58's individual safety, as well as the safety of others in the facility. Findings include: (Cross reference to F657- Care Plan Timing and Revision) The facility failed to revise and ensure Resident (R) 58's comprehensive care plan was person-centered. R58's care plan for smoking does not include approaches when expressing the facility's current designated smoking area is unsafe and prefers to smoke at a non-designated smoking area. R58 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of embolism and thrombosis of arteries of the lower extremities, acquired absence of right leg above knee, history of falls, difficulty in walking, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of R58's Electronic Health Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to adhere to professional standards of practice and infection prevention and control measures for one resident with an indwelling urinary catheter. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents that have an indwelling urinary catheter putting them at risk to develop complications including urinary tract infections. Finding Includes: On 02/07/23 at 09:10 AM, observed Resident (R)53 lying in bed with indwelling urinary catheter tubing and collection bag touching the floor. Then at 12:35 PM when the resident was being brought to the dining area via wheelchair, observed the urinary catheter tubing being dragged on the floor during transport. On 02/08/23 at 11:29 AM, observed R53 lying in bed and no longer has the indwelling urinary catheter. Review of records revealed that on 02/07/23 at 13:19 PM, Progress Notes documented: received report from floor nurse that resident is not at her baseline, with noted confusion, foul smelling dark colored urine with sediment. MD (attending physician) made aware received…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to identify and verify a significant weight loss/gain and ensure a resident maintained acceptable parameters of body weight for 1 of 4 residents (Resident (R)64) sampled. R64 had a significant weight loss of 19.30% from 10/27/22 to 11/10/22 and a significant weight gain of 20.62% from 11/10/22 to 01/29/23 that was not verified and/or addressed. As a result of this deficiency, residents are at risk for the potential of negative outcomes due to unidentified changes. Findings include: R64 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that include dementia, with behavioral disturbances, diabetes mellitus type 2 without complications, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and insomnia. On 02/10/22 at 10:10 AM, conducted a review of R64's Electronic Health Record (EHR). Review of the resident's weights documented: 10/27/22- 120.2 lbs (pounds); 11/10/22- 97.0 lbs; 12/22- Refused weights; and 01/29/23- 117 lbs. Indicating R64 had a significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an account (route and time) of a controlled medication for one resident (Resident (R)23) sampled. As a result of this deficiency, the resident is at risk for more than minimal harm and provides an opportunity for diversion of a controlled medication. Findings include: R23 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted with type 2 diabetes mellitus, end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis, non-pressure chronic ulcers to both heels, cellulitis (bacterial skin infection causing redness, swelling and pain) to both lower limbs, chronic osteomyelitis (bone inflammation or infection) to both left and right ankles. Resident is transported to an incenter dialysis clinic three times a week and is on oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 10 milligrams (mg) every 3 hours routinely for pain. Review of R23's electronic health record (EHR) included scanned communications between the facility and the incenter dialysis clinic in Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent (%) or greater. The survey team observed a total of 28 medications, the total number of errors were 2, and the medication error rate was 7.14%. As a result of this deficient practice, there is potential for more than minimal harm. Findings include: On 02/09/23 at 08:24 AM, conducted observation of medication administration on the second-floor unit with Registered Nurse (RN)71 for R33. RN71 prepared the residents medication and crushed all medications (Acetaminophen 325 mg (2 tablets, total dose 650 mg); Laxatives (2 tablets); and Vitamin C 500 mg (1 tab, not factored into percent rate)) and mixed the crushed medications with applesauce in a medication cup. RN71 administered the crushed medications to R33 then proceeded to walk towards the trash in the resident's room. This surveyor inquired if RN71 completed administering the medication to R33. RN71 confirmed he/she had administered the medication and was going to throw the medication cup away. Asked RN71 if there were any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs are stored in locked compartments and intravenous (IV) fluid was discarded when IV therapy was discontinued. A treatment cart with topical medications was not kept locked or under the direct observation of authorized staffing in an area where residents could access it. No medications were taken by the resident but the potential for more than minimal harm exist. Findings include: 1) On 02/08/23 at 08:15 AM, observed the treatment cart on 1 of 2 units was unlocked in the main dining/activity room. The treatment cart was unsupervised, there were two residents in the area, unsupervised, and no staff in the immediate area. This surveyor opened the treatment cart and documented the cart had topical creams that included Clotrimazole cream, Ketoconazole cream, and Triamcinolone Acetonide ointment. On 02/08/23 at 2:35 PM, conducted a review of R48's Electronic Health Record (EHR). Review of R48's most recent annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/09/22 Section G.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident (R) 58's menu was followed to meet her choices and preferences. Findings include: On 02/09/23 at 08:08 AM, observed R58 receive her breakfast tray and inform nursing staff she did not get milk on her tray. At 08:20 AM, inquired with R58 how breakfast was, R58 reported her milk was not on her tray. On 02/09/23 at 10:09 AM, interview with R58 with resident council members was done. R58 reported sometimes their meal tickets (menu) are not followed. R58 stated For instance, my meal ticket said milk and on the meal tray, I did not get milk this morning. R58 stated she had to let nursing staff know so she could get her milk but is worried about those who cannot speak for themselves. On 02/10/23 at 09:28 AM, observed R58 eating breakfast. R58 stated she received papaya and hot cereal although her meal ticket says no papaya and no hot cereal. R58 reported she gave her papaya to the resident next to her. Observed papaya on a plate with the resident next to R58 and hot cereal on R58's tray. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3) On 02/09/23 at 08:15 AM, observed RN71 using a wrist blood pressure cuff on R33. RN71 did not disinfect the wrist blood pressure cuff before or after use. Inquired with RN71 how the wrist blood pressure cuffs should be disinfected due to the porous material that is in direct contact with the resident's skin and if it should have been disinfected before and/or after use. RN71 stated the wrist blood pressure cuff should have been cleaned before it was used on R33 but was not and purple wipes are used to clean the reusable equipment and had not thought about the band of the cuff is fabric and the purple wipes may not be an appropriate way to disinfect it. Conducted an interview with the facility's IP and shared my observation of staff not disinfecting the reusable wrist blood pressure cuff. The IP confirmed reusable medical equipment should be disinfected before and after use, at a minimum, before it is used. IP also confirmed that due to the fabric on the wrist blood pressure cuff, the purple wipes is not an appropriate disinfectant and staff should use blood pressure cuffs that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-14 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean equipment for a resident (Resident(R14) sampled. R14 is dependent on supplemental oxygen and the filter of the oxygen concentrator machine had a layer of dust on it. As a result of this deficient practice, the resident is at risk for more than minimal harm. Finding includes: R14 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis that include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (disease that blocks air from entering the lungs making it harder to breath), chronic respiratory failure, and dependence on supplemental oxygen. On 02/07/23 at 09:47 AM, Observed R14 lying in bed, receiving oxygen 2 liters (L) of oxygen via nasal cannula. The external filter located on the right side of the machine, was covered with a layer of whitish/grayish dust. On 02/08/23 at 08:42 AM, conducted a concurrent observation and interview with Unit Manager (UM) 4 of R14 and the oxygen concentrator filter. It was observed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NEW FAMILY HEALTH, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 10/30/2020 |
| SALLIE Y. MIYAWAKI TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/30/2020 |
| MIYAWAKI, EDISON | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 10/01/2020 |
| EHM LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 10/30/2020 |
| KOP, ARNOLD | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2025 |
| SUDARIO, SHERRIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2025 |
| YOSHIMOTO, DARIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/02/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $588K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in HI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125041. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-31, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.