Maunalani Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

73.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 274 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 58.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 138 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.62 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 89% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 86.5 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.77 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.82 to 1.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 97% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 11 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for one of three residents (Resident (R) 2) sampled for falls and one of one resident (R1) sampled for accident hazards. 1) The facility failed to ensure two trained staff members operated a mechanical lift and upon analysis, indicated human error, which lead to R2's fall from the lift. During transfer with use of a mechanical lift, the left side lift sling straps slipped off the hanger bar as R2 was lifted causing R2 to fall. As a result, R2 was hospitalized with left side rib fractures with pneumothorax (collapsed lung) requiring a pigtail chest tube placement. 2) The facility failed to ensure R1 received care consistent with her physician orders. As a result, R1's safety was compromised, and she was placed at risk of an avoidable injury and/or adverse outcome in the event of a respiratory emergency. Findings Include:1) R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses, not limited to, resolved right…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to one Resident (R)2. On 09/21/2024, R2 fell while in the Physical Therapy gym which resulted in harm. He was hospitalized with a subdural hematoma (bleeding near the brain) which required immediate surgical intervention. In addition, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation, document findings, and interventions taken to reduce the likelihood of a similar event. This deficient practice could affect any resident if the appropriate level of supervision is not provided. Findings include: 1) On 09/23/2024, the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received an facility reported incident (ACTs # 11218) regarding a witnessed fall with injury. The report included: Resident is a [AGE] year-old-male who was admitted . on 09/12/2024 for PT/OT (physical/occupational services) after being hospitalized . following right foot necrotizing fasciitis status post angiogram and balloon angioplasty on 8/29/24, then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-10 · tag F0712 — pattern
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of medical records, documents and policies, three Resident ((R)1, R2 and R3) of a sample size of three, had incomplete medical records. Physician visits and/or discharge summary and initial admission orders lacked timely signature by the attending physician as required by regulatory standards. In addition. one initial History and Physical (R)1 was not documented in the medical record (EMR). These deficiencies do not meet the requirements for timely and authenticated physician documentation to support continuity of care and compliance with federal regulations. Findings include:1) R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for subacute rehabilitation and skilled nursing management following hospitalization for sepsis secondary to a urinary tract infection. Reviewed R1's medical records on 06/08/26, which revealed the following: - Initial admission orders were entered into the EMR by the nursing staff on the date of admission, 08/05/25. There was no evidence in the medical record that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, documents and record review, the facility failed to respond to a family member's (FM) email grievance regarding Resident (R)1's stay at the facility. The facility reported no grievances during period requested (September 2025 to June 8,20-26). There was no follow-up documentation, resolution, or communication to the FM. This failure resulted in several of the FM's concerns remaining unaddressed and caused ongoing dissatisfaction. Findings include:1) On survey entry, requested the facility grievance log from September 2025 to current. On 06/08/26 at approximately 01:00 PM, interviewed the Administrator (ADM) and the Director of Nursing (DON) about the facility process for grievances. At that time, interviewed the ADM, who said they did not have any grievances during the period the log was requested.2) On 06/09/25 at 09:38 AM during a second interview with the ADM, she stated she found an email the previous night in her spam file with a grievance from R1's FM that was sent to her and copied to the Ombudsman and the Office of Healthcare Assurance. She said she…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-10-18 · tag F0661 — pattern
  Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, document and medical record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure appropriate discharge summaries were completed for two out of a sample size of three residents (R). R1 and R2 were transferred to the Hospital for a higher level of care, but when the Resident's families informed the facility the resident would not be returning to the facility, the discharge summaries are required to include a recapitulation of the resident's stay and treatment in the facility. R2's discharge summary was not accurate or complete, and R1's had not been completed prior to survey. As a result of these deficiencies, the provider did not have all the necessary information regarding the resident's clinical status. This deficient practice could affect all discharged resident's. Findings include: 1) R1 is a [AGE] year old female with significant past medical history that included, but not limited to Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA/stroke) resulting in right lower extremity weakness, hypertension (high blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document and record review, the facility failed to recognize the seriousness of one Resident's (R)1 condition, of a sample size of three. Specifically, R1 exhibited a change in level of consciousness on two consecutive days, and on day two, the nursing staff determined her condition not serious enough to transport to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS/911). In addition, the facity failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for R1's multiple skin tears. As result of these deficiencies, R1 was 1) hospitalized for sepsis due to urinary tract infection (UTI), and 2) continued to get skin tears. These deficiencies may affect any resident, and has potential to delay transport to a higher level of care. Findings include: 1) Reviewed the facility grievance log, which included a complaint made by R1's daughter. The Complaint Report Form was dated 09/12/2024, and included Dtr (daughter) expressed concerns that staff did not contact EMS (Emergency Medical Services/011) timely to address…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and medical record review (RR), one physician's (MD)1 documentation of one Resident's (R)2 visit, did not meet regulatory requirements. MD1's visit note did not accurately reflect R2's total program of care, and included an inaccurate statement. Findings include: R2 was a [AGE] year old male with past pertinent history of diabetes (on insulin), hypertension, anemia of chronic renal failure, and end stage renal disease. He was incontinent of urine, had a urostomy (urinary bladder removed and opening in belly created to drain urine), and received dialysis three times a week. R2 has some memory issues at baseline and prior to hospitalization was dependant on daughter for care. He was hospitalized on [DATE], for sepsis due to cellulitis (bacterial infection) of the right lower extremity. His hospitalization was complicated by multiple debridements and necrotizing fasciitis (flesh-eating disease) and delirium. On 09/05/2024, R2 had an amputation above the right knee. On 09/12/2024, he was admitted…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, family interviews, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to care for two Residents (R) 46 and 188 of eight residents reviewed, with respect and dignity. As a result of this deficiency, R46 and R188 were not given their right to the maintenance and/or enhancement of their quality of life. Findings include: 1) During an interview with R46's family (FAM) on 08/26/24 at 12:00 PM, FAM was concerned about several issues related to care and quality of life. FAM said that the showering was not being done three times a week as ordered. FAM said they would notice dirt or fecal like matter on the hands or fingernails after the supposed showering. FAM said they have not had any follow up from the physician about medications related to low blood pressure. During activities, FAM said that staff would speak loudly and scare R46. Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed R46 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including Cerebral Infarction (Stroke), Difficulty Walking,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one Resident (R) 2 of three in the sample who had two pressure ulcer's that were acquired in the facility. The resident assessment coded one stage three pressure injury as present on admission. The deficient practice potentially affects the care plan which implements the goals and treatment outcomes. All residents in the facility may be affected. Findings include: Cross Reference to F696. Electronic Health Record (EHR) review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Annual assessment date 02/27/2024. R2 did not have any unhealed pressure ulcers. RR of MDS change of status assessment date 04/11/2024. R2 has a stage three pressure ulcer that was coded as present on admission. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly review 07/12/24. R2 is cognitively intact with impairment on bilateral upper and lower extremities and dependent on staff for self-care and mobility. R2 is coded with having a stage three pressure ulcer that was present on admission. Interview and concurrent record review with the Director of Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of two stage three (full thickness skin loss) pressure ulcers (a localized damage to the skin and/or underlying tissue, as a result of intense pressure in combination with shear) while in the facility for one resident (R) 2 of three in the sample. The facility staff failed to turn and reposition R2 every 1-2 hours. The deficient practice placed the resident at an increased risk of infection and poor health outcomes. All residents who require assistance from staff for mobility are at risk. Findings include: R2 is a [AGE] year-old female. Primary diagnoses includes other neurological conditions, and coronary artery disease. R2 was readmitted to the facility after being discharged to the hospital on [DATE] per Electronic Health Record (EHR) review of the census and face sheet. Review of the facility matrix revealed that R2 had a stage three pressure…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to store and handle food items under sanitary conditions. This failed practice could place all facility residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 08/28/23 at 08:27 AM in the kitchen. A large freezer contained cake, six English muffins, and four bagels. All mentioned food items were wrapped in plastic and did not have a label. On the prep table, a half full bottle of thickener was observed without a label. Observation was conducted in the storage room on 08/28/23 at 08:40 AM. Six unopened boxes were placed directly on the floor. Large opened bags of penne pasta and macaroni noodles were wrapped in plastic with no labeled open dates. The freezer contained two large pork butt out of the box without dates, a package of edamame (soybeans) with an expiration date of 02/18/22, and unknown meat item in an unlabeled blue bag. Interview was conducted with Kitchen Manager (KM) on 08/28/23 between the times of 08:27 AM and 08:40 AM in the kitchen and storage room. KM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 08/29/23 at 07:30 AM, six of seven rooms that had Airborne TBP signs outside were observed with the doors left wide open. Upon interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP), it was confirmed that the doors were left wide open to these rooms. Guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) state that doors will be closed when Airborne TBP are in place, to prevent spread of airborne-transmitted communicable diseases such as COVID. Seven residents were positive for COVID in these rooms and included rooms 214, 216, 217, 218 and 219. Further observations made on 08/29/23 included three wall-mounted fans outside of these open rooms, mounted high on the hallway walls to increase air circulation, were on. This observation was also confirmed with the IP. The wall-mounted hallway fans being on helps facilitate the spread of airborne microorganisms to other areas of the unit, putting all residents, visitors and staff at risk of the development and transmission of COVID. Two of the three…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$32,133 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $24,115 — penalty dated 2025-08-14
• $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-10-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $768K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI