Oahu Care Facility
1808 South Beretania Street, Honolulu, HI 96826 · For profit - Corporation · 82 certified beds · (808) 687-3300 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,278 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-25)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.9% | 16.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.7% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 4.2% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.7% | 1.2% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.9% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 23.0% | 20.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.4% | 9.1% | 18.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.3% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 29.5% | 17.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.8% | 11.9% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 3.5% | 1.4% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 56.0% | 84.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.6% | 19.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 7.4% | 10.3% | 12.0% | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 72 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.28 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 68.1%CMS range 57.9–79.4 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.1–15.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 51.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 55.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 94.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 93.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 3.7–12.0 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 65.3 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.09 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.44 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.53 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.33 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.59 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
37 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, medical record review and document review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision of one Resident (R)3 of three residents sampled that were high risk of elopement. R3 eloped on 02/09/2025 and suffered harm. When she was found, she was taken to the hospital where she was treated for abrasions from a fall and discharged back to the facility. The facility met the following three criteria for past non-compliance 1) Not in compliance with the regulatory requirement at the time the situation occurred; 2) The noncompliance occurred after the exit date of the last recertification and 3) There is evidence that the facility corrected the noncompliance and is in substantial compliant at the time of this survey. Findings include: 1) The Office of Healthcare Assurance received an initial facility reported incident (ACTS # 11488) on 02/10/2025 regarding an elopement. The report included the following information: -R3 initially admitted to facility on 01/10/2025 for skilled nursing facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure an effective discharge planning process was developed and implemented which considered the care giver's availability, capacity, and capability to perform needed care, to meet the needs of the resident following discharge for one out of three residents sampled. This deficient practice resulted in an unsafe discharge. Findings include: On 05/19/26 at 09:10 AM, conducted a review of Resident (R) 2's Electronic Health Records (EHR). R2 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnosis which include, but not limited to, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, end-stage renal disease, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident was discharged on 03/04/26. The discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/04/26, documented in Section C. Cognitive Patterns, a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 9, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the resident Care Conference Summary conducted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a discharge summary included a recapitulation of the resident's stay that includes, but is not limited to, diagnoses, course of illness/treatment or therapy, and and/or consultation results for one of three residents sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, relevant information was not relayed to the appropriate care provider. Findings include: Definition: Recapitulation of Stay- A concise summary of the resident's stay and course of treatment in the facility. On [DATE] at 09:10 AM, conducted a review of Resident (R) 2's Electronic Health Records (EHR). R2 was admitted on [DATE] to the facility with diagnosis which includes, but not limited to, congestive heart failure, dysphagia, end-stage renal disease, and cognitive communication deficit. The resident was discharged on [DATE]. Review of progress notes documented R2:Was dependent on dialysis services and would not always complete the entire dialysis treatment as prescribed.Would…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect and promote quality of life for 1 of 1 resident (Resident (R)68) sampled for dignity by ensuring that he was treated with the respect and consideration any reasonable person would expect. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure staff provided feeding assistance in a manner that considered proper pacing and dignity. As a result of this deficient practice, R68's dignity was compromised, and he was placed at risk of a decreased quality of life. Findings include: Resident (R)68 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R68's current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and functional quadriplegia (the complete immobility of all four limbs due to a severe disability or frailty from a medical condition. It means the person cannot move their limbs, requiring total assistance with daily activities). A review of his most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview and review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, the facility failed to accurately record the type of discharge in the RAI, Minimum Data Set (MDS) for one Resident (R)92 of three residents sampled. As a result of this deficiency, the facility put R92 at risk for further RAI, MDS inaccuracy.Findings include:Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed R92 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Metabolic Encephalopathy, Intestinal Obstruction, Anemia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Bipolar Disorder, Hypertension, Depression.Review of the most recent MDS, Assessment Reference Date 09/06/25, Section A310G, type of Discharge was inaccurately marked as Unplanned Discharge which meant that the discharge was not expected and did not follow the discharge plan. Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR), progress notes showed that R92 was discharged home on [DATE], as expected and followed the discharge plan.During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 3 residents (Residents (R)8 and R84) sampled for pressure ulcers received the necessary monitoring, treatment, and services, consistent with professional standards of practice and their comprehensive care plans, to promote healing and prevent worsening. Specifically, the facility did not monitor/document the wound status of the pressure ulcers. As a result of this deficient practice, there was no way to measure if the treatment being provided was effective or needed to be modified. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)8 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for hospice/end-of-life care. A review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Comprehensive Assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/28/2024 revealed that she was admitted with a Stage 4 pressure ulcer (bed sore classification meaning there was full-thickness tissue loss extending into muscle, bone, or tendons) on her coccyx (tailbone). Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident (R)68) sampled for limited range of motion (ROM) received the appropriate treatment, equipment, and services, to increase mobility or prevent further decrease in ROM. As a result of this deficient practice, R68 was placed at risk of decreased mobility and comfort and hindered from reaching his highest practicable well-being. Findings include: Resident (R)68 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R68's current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, contracture (tightening and shortening of muscles, tendons, skin, and other soft tissues, causing joints to become stiff and limiting their normal movement), and functional quadriplegia (the complete immobility of all four limbs due to a severe disability or frailty from a medical condition. It means the person cannot move their limbs, requiring total assistance with daily activities). A review of his most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident sampled for smoking (Resident (R) 12) with an ashtray made of non-combustible material while he was smoking, and the facility's designated smoking area did not contain a metal container with a self-closing cover device to dispose of cigarette butts and ashes. This deficient practice did not ensure the safety for R12 and other residents in the facility that smoke.Findings include:On 09/23/25 at 12:23 PM, observed R12 being assisted by Activity Aide (AA) 10 via wheelchair to the designated smoking area located outside of the facility near the Administration building. On the way, AA10 stopped with R12 at the ground floor station near the kitchen and asked Administration Assistant (NAA) 5 for an ashtray. NAA5 responded that the ashtrays were missing. AA10 proceeded with R12 to the designated smoking area without an ashtray. The designated smoking area did not contain a metal container with a self-closing cover device to safely dispose of cigarette butt and ashes. When R12 was done with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility had no defined policy and procedure on how to manage the disposition for discontinued non-controlled medications located in the medication administration cart. This deficient practice creates a potential unsafe situation where discontinued medications could inadvertently be administered to residents in the facility.Findings include:On 09/25/25 at 08:22 AM, medication cart A on the second floor of the facility was checked. While checking the medications in the drawers, Registered Nurse (RN) 8 identified medication for three residents were discontinued but remained stored in the medication cart (NovoLog (Aspart) insulin pen for Resident (R) 19 and R29 and Nicotine Patches for R12). A concurrent review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed 09/24/25 discharge orders for R19 and R29's Novolog insulin pen. RN8 stated she was the one that received the discontinuation order. The Nicotine patch had a discontinuation date of 08/29/25 noted in the EHR. RN8 stated the three medications should have been removed from the cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the medication regimen for 1 of 6 residents (Resident (R)45) sampled for unnecessary medications. Specifically, the facility failed to monitor for and appropriately document episodes of excessive sleepiness despite identifying it as a problem. As a result of this deficient practice, R45 was placed at risk of avoidable accidents related to adverse effects of potentially unnecessary medication(s). Findings include:Resident (R)45 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R45's current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, dementia and insomnia. A review of her provider orders noted the following:11/26/2021: monitor hours of sleep every shift.07/01/2022: melatonin (a sleep aid supplement) 3 milligrams (mg) at every bedtime for sleep aid. Scheduled for 7:00 PM. 06/20/2023: l-tryptophan (a sleep aid supplement) give 2 capsules at bedtime for sleep aid. Scheduled for 9:00 PM.04/02/2025: mirtazapine (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate protective and preventive measures for communicable diseases and infections as evidenced by: 1) Failing to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions (additional measures used to help stop infection transmission when a patient/resident has been found to be infected or colonized with certain infectious agents), wearing and cleaning proper personal protective equipment (PPE), keeping dedicated equipment in the room, and 2) Failing to label and properly store a nasal cannula. As a result of the deficiencies, the facility put the residents at increased risk to communicable disease and infections. Findings include: 1) On 09/23/2025 at 8:37 AM, while doing an initial tour of the third floor, observed Special Droplet/Contact Precautions signage outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] with instructions for anyone entering to put on the following PPE: mask or respirator, face shield or goggles, gown, and gloves. The signage also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to meet regulatory requirements for Baseline Care Plans (BCP) for three of three Residents (R)1, R2, and R4. Specifically, R1 did not have a BCP developed within 48 hours of admission, R4's BCP did not include the Stage 2 Pressure Ulcer that was present on admission, and two residents were not provided summaries of the BCP. This deficient practice places residents at risk for not receiving appropriate and timely care, delays the development of care to address resident's immediate health and safety needs, hinders continuity of care, and impedes communication amongst nursing home staff. Findings include: 1) On 03/24/2025 at 10:30 AM, record review of R2s BCP was noted to be blank and not completed. R2 was admitted on [DATE], and comprehensive care plan (CCP) was initiated on 02/28/2025. Further review of R2's electronic medical record (EMR), did not note they were furnished with a copy of their BCP. On 03/24/2025 at 03:00 PM, interview with Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide repositioning, the standard of care for pressure ulcers (PU/ injury to the skin and tissue below the skin due to pressure on the skin for a long time), and as directed in care plans for three Residents (R)1, R2 and R4 out of a sample size of three. This deficient practice puts residents with PU's at risk of worsening the wound, and increases the potential of those at risk to develop one. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference F655 Baseline Care Plan R4 was a [AGE] year old female admitted to the facility for skilled nursing services on 03/19/2025 for short term rehabilitation after being hospitalized for two unwitnessed falls at home. She had a sacral Stage 2 PU present on admission that was not identified on her baseline care plan. Record review revealed no documentation the R4 had been turned or repositioned until after the treatment administration record (TAR) was initatiated on 03/25/2025. 2) Record review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan (CCP) for one Resident (R)1 of a sample size of three. Specifically, R1's CCP did not address his safety needs in a timely manner. As a result of this deficiency, R1 may have been at higher risk of falls. The deficient practice of not addressing resident's needs timely in the CCP could affect any resident and be a barrier to meeting their highest potential of physical and mental well-being. Findings include: Record review of R1's electronic medical record (EMR) noted that prior to admission on [DATE], R1 was admitted to a hospital with a subdural hematoma (brain bleed caused by trauma) due to falling at home. R1's baseline care plan (BCP) completed on admission to the facility, noted R1 to be cognitively impaired, marked Yes, for fall(s) in the past three months, level of consciousness marked as disoriented x3 at all times, and functional ability and goals were not assessed. admission progress notes detailed resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure staff use non-expired test strips for their kitchen three compartment sink to test for levels of strength of sanitizer solutions, failed to store clean meal lids on a rack that did not have rusty colored debris and failed to label opened beverages with the opened-on date. Findings Include: 1) Observation on 08/26/24 at 10:40 AM had kitchen staff test the strength of sanitizer in their three compartments sink and found facility was using expired Hydrion test strips with an expiration date of [DATE]. Food Service Worker (FSW) 11 confirmed the test strips were expired and got new test strips and tested the water which was in range. 2) On 08/28/24 at 10:57 AM while observing tray line observed a rack in the kitchen near the stove, which held clean lids for resident meals, had rust colored debris. Inquired with Dietary Manager who confirmed there was rust colored debris and stated, need to change it out. 3) On 08/29/24 at 09:50 AM observed nourishment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures when providing care for residents on isolation. The facility did not ensure that staff were wearing applicable personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to residents on transmission-based precautions (TBP). This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for the potential spread of infections and communicable diseases. Findings include: On 08/26/24 at 11:03 AM, observed postings on the door of room [ROOM NUMBER] that stated, Special Droplet/Contact Precautions. The posting also stated that eye protection, gown and gloves are required when entering the room. Registered Nurse (RN)9 confirmed that one of the residents in room [ROOM NUMBER] recently tested positive for COVID-19. On 08/26/24 at 11:39 AM, observed Physical Therapist Assistant (PTA)1 in room [ROOM NUMBER] talking to Resident (R)61. PTA1 was not wearing a gown and did not have a face shield or eye…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to inform a resident of the risks and benefits of the use of psychotropic drugs and obtain consent for one of five residents (Resident (R)3) sampled for unnecessary medications. As a result of this deficiency, the resident was placed at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: R3 was an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to anxiety disorder, dementia, and major depressive disorder. Ordered medications included mirtazapine and duloxetine (antidepressants). Review of R3's Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented the consents for the use of the psychotropic medications including education on the risks and benefits were not found. On 08/28/24 at 12:34 PM, requested from Director of Nursing (DON) a copy of the consents for the use of antidepressants for R3. DON said he will look in the paper files since R3 was already on the medications before the facility switched over to the EHR. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be free from physical restraint for staff convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms for one resident (Resident (R)5) sampled. Positioning wedges were placed under R5's mattress and under the resident's fitted sheet in a manner which could not be removed by the resident, which hindered the resident from freely moving at will. An interview with staff confirmed the positioning wedges were not used to reposition R5 and the resident is capable of independently moving around in bed. As a result of this deficient practice, residents with the ability to move independently are at risk of the potential for more than harm. Findings include: On 08/26/24 at 11:50 AM, 12:30 PM, and 02:05 PM, observed a large black positioning wedge and pillow placed under the bed's mattress. The placement of the positioning wedge and pillow caused the mattress to be concaved and restricted the resident from freely moving around. Inquired with the resident if he was able to move…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to provide written notification of the bed hold policy to the resident or the resident's representative for two of the five residents (Resident (R)6, and 167) sampled for hospitalization. As a result of this deficient practice, there was a potential for miscommunication. This has the potential to affect all the residents that are transferred to an acute care hospital. Findings include: 1) R6 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R6's electronic health record (EHR) revealed that she was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] for acute lower GI (gastrointestinal) bleeding. R6's EHR did not contain documentation that R6's representative was provided a written notification of the facility's bed hold policy. On 08/29/24, requested a copy of the written notification of the bed hold policy provided to R6's representative from the Director of Nursing (DON). DON said he will check. On 08/29/24 at 04:14 PM, the Social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was implemented for one resident (Resident (R)56) sampled. R56's person-centered care plan included an intervention to use alternative communication tools (i.e. interpreter services, available for staff use) for this Korean speaking resident. Staff did not implement the use of interpreter services intervention when conducting the Brief Interview for Mental Status (a tool used to assess the resident's cognition). As a result of this deficient practice, all non-English speaking residents are at risk of the potential for more than minimal harm. Findings include: On 08/27/24 at 12:28 PM, conducted an observation of R56 in the unit's main dining room during lunch. The resident was seated next to another Korean speaking resident and conversed with each other throughout lunch. When R56 was done with her meal, facility staff approached R56 and attempted to have a conversation with the resident in English. R56 waived her hand at the staff then said No, English, then said something…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to develop a discharge plan for two of 18 residents (Resident (R)61 and R219) sampled. The discharge needs and/or discharge goals for these residents were not identified to ensure the residents are ready for discharge according to their individual needs. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for more than minimal harm related to an unsafe discharge from the facility and/or a readmission to the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered stated, . The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: a. includes measurable objectives and timeframes . c. includes the resident's stated goals upon admission and desired outcomes . 1) R61 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility for short-term rehabilitation on 07/24/24. During an interview with R61 on 08/26/24 at 11:48 AM, R61 said he was only at the facility short-term. R61 reported he is from another island and was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure Resident (R)122 is provided appropriate services for communication. As a result of this deficient practice, non-English speaking residents are at potential risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: On 08/27/24 at 09:10 AM before going into R122's room inquired with Registered Nurse (RN)17 if they use interpreter services with resident and she stated she does not think they are. Administrator overheard and stated they are using interpreter services because she receives the bill and pays it each month. On 08/27/24 at 09:13 AM, attempted to interview R122 and she said, No English. On 08/28/24 at 01:48 PM, conducted an interview with Admissions Staff (AS)2 and she confirmed an admission packet was provided to R122 and she completed R122's admission. Inquired about English as a second language for R122. AS2 stated she would speak slowly for resident and R122 was comfortable with this. AS2 also stated the facility has Korean speaking staff at the facility, the resident ask to use an interpreter, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment remains as free of accident hazards and adequate supervision to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident (R)56) sampled. A nurse's scissor was left unattended in an area accessible to resident and not properly stored. R56 was not adequately supervised, had access to a scissor, and managed to elope from the facility without staff's knowledge. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk of more than minimal harm. Findings include: 1) Observation on 08/26/24 at 11:55 AM, before walking out of a non-COVID room on the second floor observed an N95 mask on the rack that is used to store chux and adult briefs. Inquired with Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)5 if the N95 mask belongs in the room and he stated he did not know who put it there and said he would throw it away. CNA5 picked up the N95 mask to throw away and behind the N95 mask was a pair of metal scissors on the shelf. On 08/26/24 at 12:15 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility also failed to ensure the records for controlled medications were maintained and accurate. As a result of this deficient practice, there is a potential for the diversion of a controlled medication. Findings include: On 08/28/24 at 08:24 AM, an inspection of the medication cart on the second floor was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN)9. While checking the controlled medications logs with RN9, reviewed a log for the administration of morphine sulfate (opioid pain-relieving medication). Observed that a dose was administered on 08/16/24 at 11:01 PM but there was no signature of the staff who gave it to the resident. RN9 confirmed that the staff who administered the medication should have signed the log immediately after giving it. Review of the facility policy titled Controlled Substances stated, . 4. When a controlled medication is administered, the licensed nurse administering the medication immediately enters the following information on the accountability record . c. Signature of the nurse administering the dose .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to properly store physician prescribed topical ointment for one resident (Resident (R)22) and failed to ensure medicated ophthalmic drops were properly labeled with an expiration date for two residents (Resident (R)32 and 52) sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, residents who receive prescribed cream, ointment and medicated ophthalmic drops are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: 1) On 08/28/24 record review of R22's Care Plan (CP) found she has a CP in place for: The resident has bowel/bladder incontinence d/t impaired mobility. At risk for skin breakdown/UTI, or falls. Has potential for constipation. Date Initiated: 06/26/2021 Revision on: 09/04/2021. The resident will remain free from skin breakdown due to incontinence and brief use through the review date. Date Initiated: 06/26/2021 Revision on: 07/09/2024 Target Date: 10/15/2024. Administer Triad paste to groin and perianal area MASD. Date Initiated: 04/26/2024 LPN RN Clean peri-area with each incontinence episode. Date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
4. On 10/11/2023 at 03:11 PM, during resident interview, R159 complained of call bell noise during the night, stated It rings 27 times before anyone answers it, I counted it. Complained that it rings so much when she is trying to sleep at night and reported not having a good nights sleep. Observation of the unit found the call light bell speaker is located outside of R159's room on the opposite wall with the speaker facing her room. 5. On 10/11/2023 at 03:21 PM during interview with R161 he reported his roommate (R164) was loud all night and kept him up, he was not able to sleep. R161 stated he was surprised his roommate was so quiet now as he was so loud previously yelling out and moaning. During this time the other resident in question was being assisted by facility staff. R161 said the resident in question will probably soon become loud. 6. On 10/12/2023 at 08:41 AM, during resident interview, R163 reported two days ago (10/10/2023) a resident (R164) in the first bed was yelling and kept him up. Resident reported last night the room was quiet because the resident (R164) in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview the facility failed to place a Contact Precautions sign and PPE cart outside of R162's room for staff and guest notification and use, failed to clean a shower chair between resident use with noted brown substance on right handrail, failed to have a food services staff (FSS)3 cover a healing burn wound while cooking food, failed to have FSS4 use gloves when unloading clean dishes from the dishwasher, failed to have FSS2 use gloves when performing tray line temperature checks over open food, and failed to deliver a lunch tray that was free from a dirty crumpled up napkin to the second floor. Findings Include: 1. During initial observations of residents, on 10/11/2023 at 10:00 AM, found R162 had contact precautions in place, order read place resident on contact precaution for MRSA [Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus] at LLE wound. The colored contact precautions sign was placed on a piece of furniture across from the resident's bed inside his room, facing the hallway leading to the resident's room. The cart of PPEs was also located…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not assure that 2 residents out of a sample of 4, Resident (R)38, and R161 was treated with dignity and maintenance of quality of life. Findings Include: 1) An attempt was made to interview R38 on 10/16/23 at 08:40 AM in the hall, across where the nursing station is and elevators. R38 was hard of hearing and distracted. R38 was not able to answer any questions. Surveyor noted that R38's hair was not brushed and hair was oily and messy. On the same day at 08:45, Registered nurse (RN1) put Ketoconazole cream to resident's scalp. RN1 stated that she had itching to her scalp and the cream is placed into her scalp by doctor's order. Inquiry was made regarding her shower schedule and when does she get a hair wash. RN2 stated that clinical assistant #2 (CN)2 does R38's shower. CNA2 does a really good job and blow dries her hair and her shower was yesterday. RN2 further stated that CNA2 was off yesterday and that CNA3 had given R38 a shower. Surveyor questioned if R38 had a shower because her hair did not look clean before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to meet the document requirements for resident transfer for two out of two sampled residents (Resident (R) 31, 50). This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect the continuation of care for the residents. Findings Include: Record review of R31 and R50's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated no documentation of R31 and R50's care plans being sent over to the receiving hospital. A review of the facility's document titled, Transfer Information Checklist, indicated that the resident's care plan is not included in the list of documents sent over to the receiving hospital. Interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on 10/13/23 at 02:21 PM in the conference room. DON verbalized that the facility does not send over care plan records to the receiving hospital.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review (RR) and staff interview Resident (R)2 developed a stage two pressure ulcer (PU) on 09/29/2023, it deteriorated and became unstageable on 10/05/2023 which the Minimum Data Set (MDS) coordinator was not made aware of, a significant change was not reported to CMS using the Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) and the Care Area Assessments (CAAs) was not completed within 14 days. Findings Include: During RR on 10/12/2023 noted R2 was being treated for a stage two pressure ulcer that was identified on 09/29/2023. Review of submitted MDS from facility to CMS found there was no SCSA and CAAs completed within 14 days from 09/29/2023. On 10/16/2023 at 12:57 PM met with MDS coordinator and inquired how she would know a resident develops a pressure ulcer. She stated that she is not notified of pressure ulcers, that she's only part-time and facility is trying to hire a full time MDS coordinator. MDS coordinator stated communication was better in the past with nurse managers who would let her know, communication has broken down. Inquired of MDS coordinator if a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan for Resident (R)162's language barrier and R163's diabetes and dialysis. R162's primary language is Chinese and R163's admission diagnosis included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) and orders for dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday each week. Findings Include: 1.) On 10/11/2023 at 09:45 am while doing rounds with residents on the second floor noted R162 had a language barrier as he told me that he does not speak English when I greeted him. Resident repeated this when I asked how he slept. R162 was not able to communicate with surveyor. RR found R162's primary language is Chinese. RN25, who filled out resident's baseline care plan form, selected unable to determine for Does the resident need or want an interpreter to communicate with a doctor or health care staff? Review of progress notes did not find any documentation that an interpreter service was used to communicate with R162 at any time from…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not assure that 1 resident out of a sample of 4, Resident (R)38, was provided care with hygiene-bathing to maintain activities of daily living. Findings Include: Surveyor noted that R38's hair was not brushed and hair was oily and messy. On the same day at 08:45, Registred nurse (RN1) put Ketoconazole cream to resident's scalp. RN1 stated that she had itching to her scalp and the cream is placed into her scalp by doctor's order. Inquiry was made regarding her shower schedule and when does she get a hair wash. RN2 stated that clinical assistant #2 (CN)2 does R38's shower. CNA2 does a really good job and blow dries her hair and her shower was yesterday. RN2 further stated that CNA2 was off yesterday and that CNA3 had given R38 a shower. Surveyor questioned if R38 had a shower because her hair did not look clean before the cream was applied. RN2 stated that evening shift do showers too. On 10/12/23 at 08:50 AM, an interview was done with CNA3. Surveyor asked CNA3 if he showered R38 yesterday and CNA3 stated Oh I did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when the staff did not continue the functional mobility services and therapy as ordered and care planned for 2 of 5 residents sampled (Resident (R)1) and R29. This deficient practice has the potential to harm R1 and R29 by decline in their mobility and worsening of contractures and haults their progress to reach their highest practicable level of health and wellbeing. Findings include: 1) On 10/12/23 at 10:31 AM, R1 was observed in bed. Contractures to left arm and right leg noted. R1 was nonverbal. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R1. In Section I, R1's active diagnosis include but not limited to non-traumatic brain dysfunction, peripheral vascular dysfunction (PVD) and hemiplegia. Section GG shows the resident is dependent with functional abilities and goals. Review of R1's care plan revealed a careplan for a problem for limited…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in a locked compartment. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and to decrease the risk for diversion of resident medications. Findings Include: Observation was conducted on 10/13/23 at 11:33 AM on the third floor. Registered Nurse (RN) 1 was observed leaving the medication cart unlocked while administering medications in room [ROOM NUMBER]. The medication cart was left unlocked in the hallway. The hallway had residents and staff members passing by. Interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 10/13/23 at 11:33 AM in the conference room. DON stated that the medication cart should have been locked when RN1 left it unattended. A review of the facility document titled, Medication Administration, was conducted. The document indicated, During administration of medications, the medication cart is kept closed and locked when out of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of tray line and staff interview the facility failed to correctly plate the prescribed diet for Resident (R) 55 who was ordered a regular chopped diet with nectar liquids. The facility staff prepared a pureed diet for R55. This failed practice puts all the facility residents at risk for receiving a meal that does not meet their health needs. Findings Include: On 10/11/2023 at approximately 11:15 AM while observing food service staff (FSS) plate residents lunches surveyor requested to spot check a tray for accuracy. FSS1, who is temporarily covering as the kitchen manager, pulled a tray that was one of the last trays to be plated and we checked the meal card to what was plated. The tray chosen was for R55 who has a regular chopped diet with nectar liquids ordered. The plated meal appeared to be a pureed diet. Surveyor asked FSS1 and FSS2 if this plated food was the correct meal that should be given to the resident. FSS1 stated no. She was able to have the kitchen staff correct their error and prepare a meal of regular chopped diet for R55. On 10/11/2023 at 11:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation of the kitchen and staff interview the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety and at the start of temperature taking of the trayline failed to correctly place thermometer in cooked food to register temperature. Findings Include: On 10/11/2023 at 08:30 AM, while doing brief tour of the kitchen, noted there were two separate containers of chopped meat (ham and Portuguese sausage) that were placed in a larger plastic container. Noted the saran wrap that had been placed over the larger plastic container had folded up upon itself when it was placed in the refrigerator that morning. It appears to have caught on the top of the shelf it was placed under. The Food Services Staff (FSS)1, who was covering for the kitchen manger, confirmed the saran wrap should have been covering the chopped meat, explained that the saran wrap was used to do that. On 10/11/2023 at 10:55 AM went to observe the trayline in the kitchen. Kitchen was very busy with food being cooked on the stove and food transferred to metal containers to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, record review (RR) and staff interview the facility failed to maintain resident medical records that accurately documented the stage of a pressure ulcer (PU) on the care plan for Resident (R)2, diet order for R55, correct days of the week of dialysis on Occupational Therapy (OT) care plan for R163 and completely fill out communication documents to dialysis center for R163. Findings Include: 1. On 10/12/2023 at 12:52 PM during RR found R2 had developed a stage 2 PU on 09/29/2023. This PU deteriorated and on 10/05/2023 was documented as unstageable. Review of R2's care plan included care for a stage 2 PU. Care plan had been updated on 10/13/2023 with no change made to identify the decline of the pressure ulcer. 2. On 10/12/2023 met with and interviewed R163 who stated he receives dialysis three times a week on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. RR found this as accurate with doctors orders for R163 to receive dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday. On 10/13/2023 at 09:36 AM met with Physical Therapy (PT) staff who was able to print out a copy of R163's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-03-25
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PACIFIC SKILLED HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 06/30/2022 |
| OLSEN, SPENCER | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER | 73% | since 06/30/2022 |
| SORENSEN, KRISTEN | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 13% | since 06/30/2022 |
| KIM, OLIVIA | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| LEFLER, TYRUS | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/23/2022 |
| PANG, BRIAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| YOSHIDA, CYNTHIA | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 02/01/2023 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $734K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in HI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125042. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.