No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Palolo Chinese Home

2459 10th Avenue, Honolulu, HI 96816 · For profit - Corporation · 113 certified beds · (808) 737-2555 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (808) 737-2555 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 20261 actual-harm citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3630 Woodlawn Terrace Pl.
Pharmacy
2750 Woodlawn Dr · (808) 988-2151 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2402 10th Ave · (808) 737-8952 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2007 Palolo Ave · (808) 768-6727 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.8%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.7%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%1.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened32.8%20.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication7.0%9.1%18.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.8%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.0%17.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table4.8%11.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.7%84.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission22.2%19.4%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.7%10.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.371.091.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.000.881.80better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

74.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 124 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

74.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
22.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.26U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 22.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 36% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF74.2%CMS range 64.2–81.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.6%CMS range 6.5–12.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge22.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge22.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge44.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified88.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting90.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.2%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened7.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.4–11.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.761.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.34
RN hours/ resident / day
0.17
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.61
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.13
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.09
RN hoursweekends
49.1%
Total nursing turnover
54.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 113 beds and averages 96.7 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.13 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.26 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.45 to 1.09 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 49% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-01)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-03-07)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and intervene for an acute change in a resident's condition related to a stroke for one (Resident (R) 4) of three residents sampled, resulting in the family telling the facility to transport the resident to the hospital.Care plan did not address the resident's stroke or include interventions for the prevention of aspirationStaff did not identify R4's occasional moist cough when eating as an early symptom of aspirationStaff did not communicate to the physician that the resident's cough had occurred while eating Staff did not follow the physician's orders for treatment of symptoms of R4's coughConflicting information in the documentation, which did not relay the resident's distress when positioned on his backAs a result of these deficient practices, the resident was admitted to the hospital in respiratory distress due to aspiration and is currently receiving hospice services (less than 6 months life expectancy). Findings Include: On 09/04/25 at 12:07 PM, conducted a telephone interview with R4's Family Member (FM).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from abuse by failing to adequately protect one of three residents reviewed for abuse allegations (R) 12). Specifically, a staff member willfully pushed R12's head without a care related purpose. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse and harm.Findings Include: Cross reference to F609, Reporting of Alleged Violations. The facility failed to ensure that a staff member who witnessed an incident involving another staff member willfully hitting a resident in the head immediately reported the incident to the administrator. On 05/04/26, the facility submitted a completed event report to the State Agency (SA), Intake #2999087. The report documented that on 04/21/26, between approximately 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 30 reportedly witnessed CNA19 strike R12 twice on the head, once on the back of the head and once on the side of the head. According to the report, CNA30 was in the room assisting R12's roommate and .reported hearing the resident and .[CNA19]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a staff member who witnessed an incident involving another staff member willfully hitting a resident in the head immediately reported the incident to the administrator for one of three residents (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for allegations of abuse. This failure had the potential to delay the facility's response to allegations of abuse and place residents at risk for harm.Findings Include: Cross reference to F600, Free from Abuse and Neglect. The facility failed to ensure that R12 remained free from abuse when a staff member was witnessed willfully pushing/hitting the resident's head without a care-related purpose. On 04/29/26, the facility submitted an initial event report to the State Agency (SA), Intake #2999087. The report documented that on 04/21/26, between approximately 7:00 PM and 8:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 30 reportedly witnessed CNA19 strike R12 twice on the head, once on the back of the head and once on the side of the head. The facility's report revealed that the incident occurred on 04/21/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an agency staff (AS) 10 who was a full-time employee completed the required training and competency evaluation program, or a competency evaluation program approved by the State for certification within four months of hire for one of three facility-reported staff-to-resident abuse allegations reviewed (Intake #2659390). This failure had the potential to place residents at risk for inadequate care and abuse. Findings Include:On [DATE] at 10:36 AM, record review was done. Review of facility document titled, Agency Staff Checklist for Credentials with staff credentials and hire dates revealed no specific Start Date for NA10. C.N.A. Certification did not also include any License Number and Expiration Date for NA10 indicating not certified. On [DATE] at 11:12 AM, an interview was conducted with Administrator. Administrator confirmed that AS10, did not meet competency evaluation requirements or a certification for nurse aide. Administrator also stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-22 · tag F0729 — isolated
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an agency staff (AS) 10 providing nurse aide services was listed on the state nurse aide registry prior to working in the facility for one of three facility-reported staff-to-resident abuse allegations reviewed (Intake #2659390). This deficient practice placed residents at risk for care being provided by unqualified staff and had the potential to affect resident safety and well-being. Findings Include:Cross reference to F0728 - Facility Hiring and Use of Nurse On 05/21/26 at 11:12 AM, an interview was conducted with Administrator. Administrator confirmed that AS10 did not meet competency evaluation requirements or a certification for nurse aide. Administrator also stated that AS10 received on-the-job training as caregiver but would not be appropriate for the Long-Term Care program. Administrator explained that the facility usually checks and requires complete education and training to include certified nurse aide (CNA) certification. Administrator agreed that SA10 should not have worked in Long-Term Care. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate documentation in a medical record for one (Resident (R) 4) of three residents sampled. Late entries affected the care the resident was provided and did not reflect an accurate presentation of the resident. Finding Include: (Cross Reference to F684- Quality of Care)1) Review of R4's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented Registered Nurse (RN) 12 wrote a late entry progress note on 08/15/25 at 02:13 AM for 08/14/25 at 05:58 AM, after the resident was discharged to the hospital. The progress note written documented, endorsed to CNAs (Certified Nurse Aide) and will endorse to morning shift that R4's Head of Bed (HOB) needs to stay elevated. However, this progress note was entered into the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) late. As a result of a late entry this information the resident's record was incomplete. This incident could be pertinent to other facility disciplines in assisting the resident to reach his/her highest attainable physical well-being. As a result of the late entry, instructions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide Resident's/representatives with the name and contact information of the facility grievance official and did not inform them of the right to receive the findings of the investigation and conclusion in writing. In addition, three out of four Resident (R) grievances reviewed, did not include findings, conclusions or if any corrective action was, or would be taken. This deficient practice could affect all Residents because the facility does not provide them the required information for them to file a grievance, and obtain an acceptable resolution. Findings include: 1) On 05/22/2025 at 02:58 PM, interviewed the Administrator-in-Training (ADM) in the conference room. The ADM confirmed that the grievance official is the Administrator. A concurrent review of the policy, with a revised date of 02/15/2021 stated, 5. The resident or person filing/addressing the grievance .will be informed of the findings .Such report will be made orally by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident residing in the facility by developing and fully implementing policy/procedures to prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation of residents, and misappropriation of resident property. Specifically, the facility did not (1) include how the facility would ensure contract/agency caregivers who provide care on behalf of the facility would receive the required training elements, and (2) four of a sample size of six contracted Nursing Assistants did not have evidence of the required training. As a result of this deficiency, the facility can not ensure contracted staff have the required knowledge to recognize and prevent abuse, which may result in negative outcomes. Findings include: 1) Reviewed the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property last revised date of 02/26/2024. The policy included: a. Employee screening and training .v. All new employees/volunteers will receive training on the abuse policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review and observation, the facility admission staff accessed one Resident's (R)1 external medical records from an acute care Hospital (H)1 through a portal/link used to facilitate referrals and admissions without R1's consent, after she left the facility against medical advice (AMA). As a result of this deficient practice, R1's rights were violated. Findings include: 1) R1 was an [AGE] year-old female, who was hospitalized at H1 from 03/23/2025 to 04/02/2025 for acute kidney injury, superimposed on chronic kidney disease. Her medical history includes chronic urinary retention requiring a suprapubic catheter (tube that drains urine from the bladder through the abdomen), recurrent urinary tract infections, bladder cancer and chronic pain. On 04/02/2025 she was discharged to the facility for short-term rehabilitation. On 04/03/2025, R1 left the facility without completing her care. Her daughter signed a Release of Responsibility Against Medical Advice (AMA), and took R1 home. 2) On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-23 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document and record review (RR) the facility failed to report to authorities an allegation of potential abuse of one Resident (R)1 of a sample of one. R1 reported she woke up with someone lying next to her in bed. The facility did not identify this incident as potential abuse, and failed to report the allegation to the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA), Adult Protective Services (APS), or the Police. As a result of this deficiency external agencies investigations were delayed and the facility failed to meet their mandated reporting requirements. Findings include: 1) On 05/19/2025, OHCA received a report from an external agency of an allegation of sexual abuse of an [AGE] year-old female that occurred at the facility by an unknown perpetrator The report included on 04/02/2025 (time not provided), AV (alleged victim) was sleeping and she awoke after she felt AP (alleged perpetrator) laying next to her. When AP found out that AV was awake, AP slid off AV's bed and left AV's room quietly.AV…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, observation, record and document review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate one alleged abuse of a sample of one, reported by Resident (R)1. Specifically, the facility did not; 1) interview R1's roommate, and all staff working, 2) summarize the findings of review of the video surveillance, and 3) document the results of their independent, internal investigation and report them to the Office of Healthcare Assurance. As a result of this deficient practice, there is the potential important information is missing from the investigation, necessary to determine the outcome. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference F609 Reporting of Alleged violations: R1 reported to the facility she woke up with someone lying next to her in bed. The facility did not identify this incident as potential abuse, and failed to report the allegation and results of their internal investigation to the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA). 2) Reviewed the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property last revised date of 02/26/2024. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 37 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a dignified existence for two (Residents (R) 395 and R18) of three residents sampled for dignity. As a result of this deficient practice, residents dependent on staff are at risk for more than minimal physical and/or psychosocial harm. Findings include: 1) On 04/28/25 at 08:47 AM, conducted an interview with R394. Inquired if staff provide timely care and respond to call lights in a reasonable time frame. R394 responded, not all the time. R394 explained it depends on who is working, some staff are better than others. R394 reported activating the call light because his/her roommate (R395) needed assistance, and staff took about 25 minutes to respond. R394 stated he/she was worried that his/her call light may not have been working because it took staff a long time to acknowledge the activated call light. R394 activated the call light because R395's legs were dangling off the bed and he/she was concerned the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary assistance to help maintain functional mobility and independence on one of two sampled residents (Resident (R)18), for accommodation of needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)18 is a [AGE] year-old male re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R18's admitting diagnoses include, but are not limited to, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (weakness on one side of the body) following cerebral infarction (stroke) left non-dominant side. A review of R18's Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/12/25. The assessment indicated R18 had been assessed with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating a determination that he was cognitively intact. On 04/28/25 at 09:05 AM, observation and concurrent interview was done with R18 at his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to choose aspects of the resident's life that are significant to the resident for two (Resident (R) 394 and R395) of two residents sampled. R394 prefers to brush her teeth in the morning, but staff regularly assist the resident in the afternoon. R395 receives hospice service and family reported not wanting the resident up in the wheelchair for more than 15-20 minutes (for meals) to allow the resident to rest in bed. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for more than minimal negative psychosocial and/or physical outcomes. Findings include: 1) On 04/28/25 at 08:42 AM, conducted an interview with R394 in the resident's room. R394 reported her preference of brushing her teeth three times a day, when she wakes up and after each meal. However, at the facility, the resident waits long after she wakes up for staff to assist her with brushing her teeth. R394 stated at times she has brushed her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a copy of the resident's Advance Health Care Directive (AHCD) and did not inform the resident of his/her right to develop one, provide assist in doing so, and/or periodically assess the residents' preference for formulating an AHCD for 2 of 2 residents (Residents (R) 46 and R12) sampled. This deficient practice does not allow residents, when incapacitated, the right to have their health care choices identified and honored. Findings include: 1) On 04/29/25 at 02:50 PM, review of R46's electronic health record (EHR) revealed a Social Services note dated 09/16/24 at 04:28 PM stating that Social Services to follow-up with hospice provider regarding R46's AHCD. Upon further review of R46's progress notes, no follow-up attempts to obtain the AHCD were documented. On 04/30/25 at 01:42 PM, interviewed the Social Services Coordinator (SS) 1 in the Social Services office. SS1 confirmed there was no documented follow-up regarding obtaining the AHCD from the hospice provider. SS1 voiced that the Social Worker at the hospice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' environments were clean and homelike, as well as, protecting residents' personal property from loss, for two of four residents (Resident (R) 8 and R65) sampled for environment. A staff member did not dispose of soiled and dirty trash items properly, leaving it on top of R8's personal property in her room. This has the potential to cause unpleasant odors and an unsanitary environment. R65's personal lamp was removed from his room without explanation or follow-up. The facility did not exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F880, Infection Prevention & Control. The facility failed to ensure R8's soiled incontinence bed pads were properly disposed of to decrease the risk of spreading infectious disease. Review of R8's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/04/25 found R8 with a score of 15 (cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a resident's comprehensive assessment accurately reflected the resident's status at the time the assessment was completed for one of seven residents (Resident (R) 293) reviewed for falls. Staff members were utilizing the bed/chair alarm as an intervention for falls and it was not reflected in the assessment under restraint. This deficient practice put R293 at risk of an inaccurate assessment of the bed/chair alarm and its appropriateness as an intervention. Findings include: Cross reference to F689, Accidents. The facility failed to ensure R293 was free from accidents and hazards. R293 was admitted to the facility with history of recurrent falls and sustained a fracture to her left femur (thigh bone) that required surgery due to an unwitnessed fall at the facility. Upon re-admission, post-fall with major injury, new interventions were not developed and R293 had two more unwitnessed falls at the facility prior to her discharge. Review of the completed facility report incident (FRI) received by the State Agency (SA)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure the development and implementation of a comprehensive person-centered care plan for two (Residents (R)30 and R56) of 22 sampled residents. As a result of this deficient practice, residents were placed at risk for decline in their quality of life, and were prevented from attaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: 1) On 04/29/25 at 02:31 PM, conducted a record review of R30's Electronic Health Record (EHR). Review of physician orders documented an order for Insulin Glargine- Subcutaneous [under the skin] Solution Pen-injector 100 UNIT/ML [milliliter] Inject as per sliding scale [dose is titrated depending on blood glucose result]: if 200 - 250 = 2 units; 251 - 300 = 4 units; 301 - 350 = 6 units; 351 - 400 = 8 units; 401 - 600 = 10 units > [if greater than] 400 give 10 units and notify MD [physician] and NP [nurse practitioner], subcutaneously in the morning for DM [diabetes].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive person-centered care plan for one of seven residents (Resident (R) 293) reviewed for falls, and one of one resident (R12) sampled for urinary catheters. R293's care plan did not include new interventions for falls after sustaining a fall with major injury. As a result, R293 experienced additional falls that may have been avoided. By not revising R12's care plan to include urinary catheter care, R12 was placed at risk for adverse catheter-related issues. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F689, Accidents. The facility failed to ensure R293 was free from accidents and hazards. R293 was admitted to the facility with history of recurrent falls and sustained a fracture to left femur (thigh bone) that required surgery due to an unwitnessed fall at the facility. Upon re-admission, post-fall with major injury, new interventions were not developed and R293 had two more unwitnessed falls at the facility prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure two of seven residents (Resident (R) 293 and R29) reviewed for falls were free from accident hazards. R293, whom previously had a fall with major injury (a fracture to the left thigh bone that required surgery), had no new interventions care planned for falls, then had a subsequent fall putting R293 at risk for further injuries. R29 was inappropriately transferred via 1-person manual transfer instead of a 2-person mechanical lift, and as a result suffered a fall with a fracture to her right ankle. Findings include: 1) R293 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing with admitting diagnoses of closed distal phalanx (toe) fracture to the right foot, first digit, dementia related to Alzheimer's disease, repeated falls, and osteoarthritis (when the flexible, protective tissue at the ends of bones, called cartilage, wears down) to bilateral knees. Review of R293's discharge summary from the hospital, prior to admittance to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff competency in completing Fall Risk Evaluations accurately for 3 of 7 residents (Residents (R)293, R294, and R28) sampled for falls. This deficient practice placed the affected residents at risk of avoidable adverse outcomes. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F689, Accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident (R)293 was free from accidents and hazards. R293 was admitted to the facility with history of recurrent falls and sustained a fracture to left femur that required surgery due to an unwitnessed fall at the facility. Upon re-admission, post-fall with major injury, new interventions were not developed and R293 had two more unwitnessed falls at the facility prior to discharge. Review of R293's fall risk assessments instruct a total score of 10 or higher indicates the resident is a high risk of fall. R293's assessments concluded a score of 13 during the admission fall risk assessment on 05/09/24, a score of 11 on 08/11/24, a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and review of facility's medication administration policy, the facility failed to keep medications secured for one of twelve residents (Resident (R), 69) observed during medication administration. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility taking medications. Findings include: On 04/30/25 at 08:00 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN)16 during medication administration for R69. RN16 walked out of the room to get correct size glove, leaving multiple medications on R69's bedside table unattended and accessible to anyone who could have entered R69's room. Concurrent interview with RN16 noted that she should not have left medications out of her sight as anyone could have taken the medications and R69 could have taken the wrong dose. RN16 agreed that it is also for safety reasons. On 4/30/25 at 10:00 AM, interview with Director of Nursing (DON) completed. DON confirmed that RN16 should not have left the medications unattended for safety reasons. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, dated 01/23/07,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's menu with selected food choice was followed for one of two residents (Resident (R) 66) sampled for food preferences. The facility did not follow-up/communicate with R66's food choice after identifying the selection may have an ingredient he is allergic to, and did not give R66 the opportunity to choose what he wanted to eat. As a result, R66 received a meal that was not listed on the menu provided in advance that he did not want to eat, causing the resident confusion. Findings include: On 04/28/25 at 11:17 AM, during lunch dining observation, observed R66 sitting in the dining room with two other residents (R35 and an unidentified resident). R66 had his meal tray on his table and was confused on what was on his plate. The other two residents did not receive their meal tray at this time. He asked R35 what was on his plate for lunch and R35 was observed to take a look at the meal ticket on R66's plate, and stated it was chicken, rice, and cauliflower. R35 explained to R66 that the meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food in the consistency ordered by the physician to meet the needs of 2 of 2 residents (Resident (R) 13 and R69) sampled for appropriate preparation of food. This deficient practice increases the risk of aspiration for residents who have a modified consistency diet order for dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Findings include: 1) On 04/28/25 at 11:31 AM, observation of R13's meal ticket noted it stated diet as chopped, regular diet with thin liquids. Observation of the beef tomato entrée on his meal tray noted the tomato was not chopped, and the beef and vegetables were of varying sizes. The Infection Prevention Coordinator (IP) was asked to make a concurrent observation and confirm if the beef tomato entrée was an appropriately chopped consistency. IP responded that it depended on the consistency of the food item and that the tomato was not chopped because it was soft. On 04/28/24 at 11:43 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 31 was asked to make a concurrent observation and confirm if the beef tomato…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to check the refrigerator temperature for one of five refrigerators in the kitchen for two consecutive days on the evening shift. This deficient practice puts resident at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: On 04/28/25 at 08:00 AM, initial walkthrough of the kitchen completed. Observed the temperature log for refrigerator #10 was missing PM temperature readings and initials for 04/25/25-4/26/25. Concurrent interview with Executive Chef (EC) noted that he was not sure why it was missed. EC also stated that it might be due to the new system implemented since he started. On 04/30/25 at 10:00 AM, interview with Director of Nursing (DON) confirmed that refrigerator temperature settings should be checked every day on both the AM and PM shifts to ensure avoiding food spoilage. On 04/30/25 at 11:30 AM, follow up interview with EC confirmed that temperatures should be checked every day on both AM and PM shifts to prevent any food spoilage and resident illness.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure a resident's (Resident (R) 8) soiled incontinence item and dirty gloves were properly disposed of, and a staff member used appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident (R84) under enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) for one of four units (Unit W) observed for infection control. These deficient practices increase the risk of the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which may affect the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F584, Clean Homelike Environment. The facility failed to ensure a soiled incontinence bed pad was discarded appropriately, the item was placed on R8's personal belongings and visible for visitors to see which had the potential to cause unpleasant odor and an unsanitary environment. On 04/30/25 at 11:38 AM, interview with Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and Infection Preventionist (IP) were done. IP reported after a staff member provides incontinence care the dirty supplies…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions in a care plan for one out of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 2). This deficient practice resulted in R2 sustaining a fall and has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: (Cross reference to F689-Free Of Accident Hazards/Supervision/Devices) A review of R2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted on 11/22/24. R2's EHR noted that R2 sustained an unwitnessed fall in the dining room on 10/24/24 at 08:40 PM. Furthermore, R2's current care plan noted the following interventions to prevent her from falling, 6/17/24 Staff to ensure common areas (i.e. dining room) are supervised at all times. Staff to communicate with one another when they have to leave the premises. A review of the facility's investigative note on R2's fall on 10/24/24 was conducted. The investigative note documented, ROOT CAUSE: .Resident was with family most of the evening and reportedly fell about 5 minutes after family left. Poor communication resulted in staff not supervising the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent two out of three sampled residents (Resident (R) 1 and R2) from falling. Due to this deficient practice R1 sustained a fall that resulted in a laceration to the head. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents who are at risks for falls in the facility. Findings Include: (Cross reference to F656-Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan) 1)R1 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has a diagnosis that include, but not limited to, spinal stenosis, mild cognitive impairment, and generalized arthritis. A review of R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/06/24, noted that R1's score for Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was a seven. Which means, R1 has severe cognitive impairment. A review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) document, dated 09/01/24, was conducted. On the FRI, the facility reported that a Certified Nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of the three sampled residents (Resident (R) 1) received treatment and care in a timely manner and in accordance with professional standards of practice. This failed practice has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings Include: R1 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R1 has medical diagnosis including but not limited to Moyamoya disease, heart failure, gastrostomy tube (feeding tube), aphasia (communication disorder) following cerebrovascular disease (condition that affects blood flow in the brain). A review of R1's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted. R1's EHR noted that R1 was diagnosed with a fracture of the left upper arm on 07/12/24. Interview was conducted with R1's spouse on 07/25/24 at 11:50 AM. R1's spouse stated that he visits R1 every day except on Saturdays. During his visits he would normally perform range of motion exercise involving R1's upper extremities and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff members, including contracted staff, followed the proper use of personal protective equipment (PPE) for a resident under contact precautions (Resident (R) 1). This deficient practice encourages the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which may affect the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: On 07/25/24 at 09:49 AM, observed Radiologist Technologist (RT) in R1's room. Observed the sign Contact Precautions for R1 with donning and doffing instruction on the door. The sign was not easily viewable due to the door being opened. Resident was observed to be lying in bed and RT prepared R1 for X-Rays on her left arm. RT was observed to move R1's blanket and arm to prepare. RT was not wearing a gown. Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 1 was in the room helping R1's roommate, when RT asked for CNA1's assistance. RT asked if R1's side rail can come down. CNA1 adjusted R1's side rail to come down. CNA1 was not wearing a gown and returned aiding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from any physical restraint imposed for purposes of convenience, and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms to one of the sampled residents (Resident (R) 28). Findings Include: R28 is a [AGE] year-old-female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R28 has a medical history not limited to dementia and Alzheimer's. Observation was conducted on 03/04/24 at 09:18 AM in R28's room. R28 was laying in bed with two wedges tucked underneath the left side of her fitted bed sheet. Observation was conducted on 03/05/24 at 07:47 AM in R28's room. R28 was positioned with the head of her bed elevated while having breakfast with the assistance of one of the staff. Two wedges were observed tucked under the left side of R28's fitted sheet. Observation and interview were conducted on 03/06/24 at 08:05 AM in R28's room. R28 was being assisted with feeding by a Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA) 10. Two wedges were tucked on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review and interview the facility failed to report an injury of unknown source to resident(R) 22's hands (bruising on top of her hands) to the Director of Nursing which impeded the investigation. This injury of unknown source to R22's hands was also not reported within five working days to the State Survey Agency. Findings Include: On 03/04/24 at 08:50 AM introduced self to R22 who was laying in her bed. At this time observed R22 had a bruise, which covered the top of her right hand, and appeared to be healing. Inquired if resident knew how she got the bruise and she did not remember how she got it. On 03/04/24 Record Review (RR) of R22's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found her diagnoses include, but are not limited to,vascular dementia (memory loss) and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (irregular rapid heart rate) which is treated with medication. R22 takes an anticoagulant (blood thinner), Apixaban. During the RR found a medication order for R22's Apixaban Oral Tablet 2.5 MG give one tablet by mouth two times a day for AFIB (Atrial Fibrillation) which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide assistance for Resident (R) 19 to maintain her personal grooming and oral hygiene and failed to provide proper perineal care (cleaning genital and anus) for R22 putting them at risk for infection. This deficient practice could affect any resident who requires assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) putting those residents are risk for infection. Findings Include: Cross-reference to F880 Infection Control. 1) On 03/05/24 at 10:40 AM entered R19's room and observed her eyes were dirty. R19's eyelashes were covered with a thick clear discharge which made it hard for resident to open her eyes. R19's mouth was dirty and edges of mouth were dry. At this time interviewed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)5. Inquired if CNA5 had assisted R19 with her morning ADLs and CNA5 stated that she had and then also stated she had gotten busy that morning. On 03/05/24 Record Review (RR) of R19's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found her diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in a locked compartment. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and to decrease the risk for diversion of resident medications. Findings Include: Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 03/05/24 at 10:28 AM. A medication cart was observed left unlocked in the hallway near the dining room. Near the medication cart were four residents and two Certified Nurse's Aide (CNA). Registered Nurse (RN) 11 was observed in one of the resident's rooms. When RN11 returned to the medication cart, she realized she left the cart unlocked and was apologetic. RN11 stated that medication carts should not be unlocked while left unattended. Interview was conducted with Director of Nursing (DON) over the phone on 03/07/24 at 11:28 AM. DON stated that medication carts should be secured and locked when left unattended. A review of the facility's document titled, Storage of Medication, dated 01/23 was conducted. The document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) During an observation of a semi-private resident room on 03/09/24 at 09:00AM, there were two different Isolation Precaution warning signs; Contact Isolation and Aerosol Precautions. The two signs did not indicate which resident was assigned to which isolation/precaution. During staff interview on 03/09/24 at 09:10AM, Registered Nurse (RN) 9 acknowledged that the two signs did not specify which resident was assigned to which isolation/precaution. RN9 added that staff, especially new staff, did not know which resident was assigned to which isolation/precaution. Review of facility policy on Isolation Practices read Contact Precautions Policy, it is the policy of this facility to use category-specific isolation techniques for residents who have infectious or communicable diseases that may necessitate the use of barriers in addition to those used for Standard Precautions. Purpose, to minimize exposure to potentially infectious materials via direct contact . Aerosol generating procedure/treatment policy, HCWs performing an Aerosol Generating Procedure who presents in room during AGP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-07 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to remove expired emergency equipment nasal cannula from the Code Crash Cart in the [NAME] Hall. Findings include: During an observation of the [NAME] Hall Code Crash Cart, on [DATE] at 08:45AM, there was an expired nasal cannula/oxygen tubing dated [DATE]. Staff interview on [DATE] at 09:00AM, Registered Nurse (RN)9 acknowledged that the nasal cannula/oxygen tubing was expired and removed from the cart. Review of facility policy on Code Crash Cart read; Policy, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that the facility will maintain at least one emergency cart per patient building . Procedure, 3. Equipment/supplies from the emergency crash cart are used only when emergency care is provided, 4. The emergency crash cart is checked by the Central Supply Clerk and after every use. Missing or expired items are replaced, when applicable.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews with staff, and record review, the facility failed to assure a system was established to ensure the dish machine sanitization process was in proper working order and failed to ensure labeling of food items. This deficient practice has the potential to result in foodborne illnesses. Findings include: 1) On 03/29/23 at 10:45 AM observed the [NAME] washing dishes. Inquired whether dishes are sanitized by heat or chemicals. The cook responded that the dish machine is supposed to sanitize dishes by heat, however, for a prolonged period, the water temperature did not reach 180 degrees Fahrenheit. The cook reported there is a problem with the heater, so it does not reach the appropriate temperature. Further queried what is being done to sanitize the dishes. The cook explained that initially the dish machine will start okay but over a period, the machine does not meet the temperature. The cook responded that the dishes were immersed in quaternary solution to ensure sanitization. [NAME] ran the dish machine, observed the water temperature of the wash cycle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-31 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, the facility failed to inform all residents, their representatives, and families of those residing in the facility by 5:00 PM the next calendar day of confirmed cases of COVID-19. This deficient practice fails to appropriately notify the residents and/or their representatives and families of an ongoing COVID-19 virus transmission in the facility. Finding includes: On 03/30/23 at 07:30 AM, Administrator notified the state agency (SA) that on the evening of 03/29/23, two residents and two employees tested positive for the COVID-19 virus. The facility also reported that one employee tested positive for the COVID-19 virus on 03/26/23. An interview was conducted with the Administrator on 03/31/23 at 09:15 AM in the conference room. Asked if residents and their families or representatives are notified of the COVID-19 cases in the facility. Administrator responded that they only notified the families and representatives of the residents that tested positive for COVID-19, the ones that came in contact with the COVID-19 positive employees and those that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to provide written notice of discharge for two residents (R), R92 and R73, out of four residents sampled. As a result of this deficiency, there was a potential for miscommunication and/or misunderstanding of the reason for resident's discharge. Findings include: 1) Cross reference to F625. The facility did not provide written notice of bed-hold policy which was included in the transfer/discharge notification. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) indicated that R92 was admitted to the hospital on [DATE] for pancreatitis and discharged from the facility. Further review did not show any written notice of discharge to the resident and/or representative. During staff interview on 03/30/23 at 09:40 AM, Social Services Coordinator (SS1) acknowledged that the facility did not provide written notification of discharge to R92 and/or representative. During staff interview on 03/30/23 at 10:25 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 reviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and review of policy, the facility failed to provide written notice of bed-hold policy for two residents (R), R92 and R73, out of four residents sampled. As a result of this deficiency, there was a potential for miscommunication and/or misunderstanding of the facility's bed-hold policy. Findings include: 1) Cross Reference to F623. R92 was transferred to a hospital. The facility did not provide R92 with a written notification of the transfer. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) indicated that R92 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for pancreatitis. Further review did not show any written notice that specifies the duration of bed-hold policy to the resident and/or representative. During staff interview on 03/30/23 at 09:40 AM, Social Services Coordinator (SS1) acknowledged that the facility did not provide written notification of bed-hold policy to R92 and/or representative. During staff interview on 03/30/23 at 10:25 AM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 reviewed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility did not assure assessments accurately reflected the residents' status for two (Residents 19 and 91) out of eighteen assessments reviewed. The facility inaccurately coded Resident (R)19 with a facility-acquired Stage III pressure ulcer and R91 as being discharged to the hospital, instead of to the community. This deficient practice has the potential to affect the development of a person-centered care plan, resulting in not meeting the needs of the residents. Findings include: 1) On 03/28/23, the facility provided a copy of the Resident Matrix (identifies pertinent care categories for: newly admitted residents in the last 30 days who are still residing in the facility, and all other residents). Resident (R)19 was identified with a Stage III pressure ulcer which was facility acquired. R19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, subsequent encounter for closed fracture with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4) On 03/25/23 at 12:23 PM, R86 was observed to have a urinary catheter with a tubing and bag system. On 03/29/23 at 09:21 AM, R86 was interviewed in her room. R86 had a urinary catheter tubing and bag system because of her diagnosis of retention of urine and hoped to have it taken out before she was discharged home soon. On 03/31/23 at 08:25 AM, R86 and Registered Nurse (RN)3 were interviewed in R86's room. R86 stated that the staff provided her education about caring for her urinary catheter with tubing and bag system. R86 was taught to clean the catheter insertion/exit site with a wet, soapy cloth and to keep catheter tubing and bag system clean. RN3 confirmed that education for care of her urinary catheter with tubing and bag system was provided to R86 and that R86 mostly does her own catheter insertion/exit site care, but at times may need assistance. Reviewed R86's electronic health record (EHR). admission Record revealed that R86 was a [AGE] year old resident admitted on [DATE]. Care plan for R86's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility failed to follow bowel regimen protocol in accordance with the physician orders for one of one resident (R), R52, sampled with constipation. The facility also failed to have a lab drawn and follow up on the results for R42's blood sugar management. These deficient practices have the potential to result in adverse consequences in residents needing bowel or blood sugar management. Findings include: 1) On the morning of 03/28/23, R52 was observed lying in bed. The resident was grimacing. R52 was asked if he had pain. The resident responded he had stomach problems. R52 was asked whether medication was provided to facilitate bowel movement. R52 confirmed medication was successful, however, had a sandwich last night and not feeling well. A follow-up visit with R52 at 2:36 PM, R52 still expressed presence of a sore stomach and tried to eat some lunch. Record review noted R52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include constipation,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to draw laboratory tests for one resident (R), R2, as recommended by the consultant pharmacist. This deficient practice has the potential to cause adverse consequences for residents where the consultant pharmacist has recommended actions to be taken for medication management. Finding includes: Cross reference to F684 Quality of Care - laboratory order was not properly entered in the electronic health record (EHR) and there was no laboratory requisition generated. Reviewed electronic health record (EHR) for R2. R2 was admitted on [DATE] for hospice care. Diagnoses include but not limited to diabetes (high level of sugar in the blood), long term use of insulin, chronic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure (condition where the heart does not pump blood efficiently causing fluid buildup in the feet, arms and lungs). Ordered medications include insulin (regulates blood sugar levels) and furosemide (water pill). Review of a Medication Regimen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview with staff members, the facility failed to assure pain medication was provided with adequate indication for its use for one resident (R), R35, of five residents sampled for medication review. The prn (as needed) medications for pain did not indicate the parameters for its use or include non-pharmacological interventions to relieve pain. This deficient practice has the potential to ensure the resident attains the highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to brachial plexus disorder (injury caused by damage to those nerves, typically from trauma, tumors, inflammation, pressure, athletic injuries, or being stretched too far); chronic systolic (congestive) heart failure; ischemic cardiomyopathy; basal cell carcinoma of skin or other parts of face; constipation; Type 2 diabetes mellitus with other skin complications; and venous insufficiency. On 03/29/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interview, the facility did not ensure that medication error rate was below five percent (%). Two administration errors to resident (R)243 out of a sample of 5 residents, were observed out of 32 opportunities, resulting in a 6.25% medication error rate. This deficient practice has the potential for inadequate administration of medications and/or adverse effects to residents. Finding includes: On 03/30/23 at 08:42 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN) 8 perform medication administration at the Lehua section of the facility. Observed RN8 administer fluticasone propionate nose spray and Trelegy inhaler to resident (R) 243. RN8 notified R243 that she will be giving her nose spay and inhaler. RN8 was holding the base of the nasal applicator between her index and middle fingers with her thumb on the bottom of the bottle. RN8 inserted the nasal applicator into R243's left nostril and pressed the bottom of the bottle twice. RN8 then inserted the applicator in the left nostril, administered 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene procedures were followed by staff between glove change during a dressing change for one resident (R), R45, and failed to ensure droplet precautions were maintained for another resident, R35, receiving aerosolized medication out of a total sample of 14 residents. These deficient practices encourages the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections which may affect the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: 1) On 03/29/23 at 10:15 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN) 8 while providing care for resident (R)45. RN8 told R45 that she will be giving her morning medications through her gastrostomy tube (GT - tube inserted though the belly directly into the stomach) and will also be changing the dressing. RN8 washed her hands in the bathroom sink and donned gloves prior to administering the medications and flushing the GT with water. After flushing the GT, RN8 changed her gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-31 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolated
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct COVID-19 testing correctly on staff being screened during a COVID-19 outbreak. This deficient practice has the potential to transmit the COVID-19 virus affecting the health and safety of residents, staff, and visitors. Finding includes: On 03/28/23 at 1:02 PM, observations were made of Registered Nurse (RN)1 conducting staff COVID-19 testing to manage an outbreak at the facility. RN1 wore a gown, gloves, face shield, and mask. Staff (S)1 wore a face mask, took off her mask, and did not hand hygiene after touching her mask. S1 swabbed both nostrils, and placed the swab unto the COVID-19 testing card and closed it. S1 did not hand hygiene after touching the COVID-19 testing card. S2 wore a face mask, pulled down her face mask by touching the front and pulling it down to her chin. S2 did not perform hand hygiene after touching her mask. S2 swabbed both nostrils, and placed the swab unto the COVID-19 testing card and sealed it closed. S2 did not hand hygiene after touching the COVID-19 testing card and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
PALOLO CHINESE HOMEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 01/01/1966
AU, GORDONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/07/2008
BACKUS, PETERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
BLANCHETTE, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/07/2008
CHING, ANTHONYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
GOO, FRANCESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/1996
HWANG, RENAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
LAU, RUSSELL JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/07/2008
LEE, GLADYSIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2008
LEE, LENORAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
LO, ELVIRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
MOATS, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
OSHIMA, ISOOIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
SCHMIDT, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
SIMON, GARYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
SMITH, DOUGLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
SOUZA, SANDRAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
TOKIOKA, TYLERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
TSEU, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/07/2008
WATANABE, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/07/2008
WONG, STACEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
WOO, BENJAMINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
YEE, REGINALDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
NAKAYAMA, DARLENEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/29/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-31.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 30%Medicare 6%Other / private 65%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$542per resident / day
operating cost
$16,472per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$412per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125059. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next