The Care Center Of Honolulu
1900 Bachelot Street, Honolulu, HI 96817 · For profit - Corporation · 182 certified beds · (808) 531-5302 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $8,018 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-15)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.6% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 4.9% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.9% | 1.0% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.8% | 2.4% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 1.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 3.8% | 0.3% | 0.1% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 1.9% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 30.4% | 20.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.3% | 9.1% | 18.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.1% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.0% | 17.6% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.9% | 11.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 78.0% | 84.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.2% | 19.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 11.8% | 10.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.38 | 1.09 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.54 | 0.88 | 1.80 | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
61.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 53.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 52% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 61.5%CMS range 52.5–68.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 8.0%CMS range 6.0–11.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 53.7% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 51.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 61.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 74.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.3%CMS range 4.9–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.12 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 171.6 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.64 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.52 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.71 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.84 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.65 to 1.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 45 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2024-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to support the resident's right to voice a complaint without the fear of reprisal or retaliation for one resident (Resident (R) 31) sampled. R31 reported an allegation of mistreatment by the Alleged Perpetrator (AP) to the Assistant Administrator (AADM). Initially, R31 reported he did not want to file a formal grievance due to being fearful what AP's reaction would be, and that R31 would not receive assistance from staff, or care would be withheld. During the facility's investigation, the facility informed R31 and AP that there should not be any form of contact between the two individuals. R31 informed AADM that despite this instruction, AP went into the resident's room and confronted him in a manner which made him feel fearful, intimidated, and unsafe. During an interview, R31 stated he did not feel that the facility could keep him safe from retaliation by the AP. As a result, R31 felt anxious, fearful, unsafe, hypervigilant causing loss of sleep, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately assess one of three residents (Resident (R) 6) selected for review to reflect resident's health status upon returning from out on pass.Findings Include: Resident (R)6 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and is currently receiving Intermediate Care Facility level of Care. Diagnoses included but not limited to congestive heart failure, nicotine dependence, osteoarthritis and diabetic neuropathy. On 04/22/26 at 11:00 AM, Office of Health Care Assurance (OHCA) received Facility Reported Incident (FRI) initial report with Intake #2991932. FRI noted that, .R6 self-reported a fall on 04/21/26 that occurred on 04/20/26 while out on pass from 11:18 AM and returned at 04:18 PM.On 04/21/26, head-to-toe skin assessment was conducted.skin and pain re-assessment identified multiple minor injuries, including a scratch to the right inner forearm measuring 0.9 cm by 0.5 cm, a skin tear with total flap loss to the left elbow measuring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards by not performing an accurate assessment of Resident (R)6 returning to the facility, and not taking actions to ensure family-supplied prescription medication was available for R7. As a result of this deficient practice, R6 received delayed medical attention after a fall, and R7 was placed at risk for adverse health effects for not taking prescribed medications. Findings include:Cross Reference to F641 - Accuracy of Assessments 1) Resident (R) 6 did not receive necessary treatment and intervention in a timely manner when R6 had a fall incident causing multiple skin abrasions and fractured ribs on 04/20/26 while R6 was out on pass. Registered Nurse (RN) 10 conducted head to toe and pain assessment on 04/20/26 but failed to observe multiple injuries, including a scratch to the right inner forearm measuring 0.9 cm by 0.5 cm, a skin tear with total flap loss to the left elbow measuring 1.7 cm by 1.9…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for Resident (R)7) in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. The documented reason for R7's missed medication dose was not accurate. This deficient practice has the potential to affect medical care provided to all the residents in the facility. Findings include:Cross-reference to F684 - Quality of Care Review of intake #2719563 stated R7's family filed a grievance regarding multiple missed doses of a prescribed medication. The medication in question was being provided by the family. The facility stated in the report that the medication was put on hold by the attending physician on 01/05/26. Review of R7's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January showed that Eltrombopag Olamine (medication that boosts the production of a blood component to stop bleeding) was not administered from 01/05/26 to 01/14/26, a total of eight doses. Documented reason for the missed dose on 01/05/26 was coded as Hold/See Progress…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and document review, the facility failed to provide evidence of a comprehensive Water Management Program (WMP) that is essential to prevent the spread of Legionella bacteria and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens (i.e. Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter) in the building water systems. The facility was not able to provide evidence that a facility risk assessment was conducted to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread. In addition, the plan did not include any text or comprehensive description of the building water system, or specify the testing protocols and acceptable ranges for control measures. As a result of this deficiency, the vulnerable residents were at increased risk of exposure to waterborne pathogens, which can cause serious health issues, or death. Findings include: The Care Center of Honolulu is a skilled nursing facility, that provides rehabilitation therapies and has a specialized respiratory unit that provides care to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all drugs and biologicals are stored in a locked compartment and properly labeled. Medication was left on a resident beside table; One of nine medication carts was observed unlocked and unattended in the hallway; and insulin syringes were not labeled according to industry standards. The deficient practice compromised the safe storage and administration of medication to the residents and the potential diversion of medications on the unit. Findings Include: On [DATE] at 02:11 PM, concurrent observation and interviews were done inside Resident (R) 57's room. Observed two white tablets inside a medication cup on R57's bedside table, while Registered Nurse (RN)25 was outside resident's room talking on the phone. When R57 was asked if the medications on her bedside table were given to her by the staff, she stated that she was not aware of the medication, name and dose. An interview was done with RN25 after he returned to check with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-19 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that residents received food in accordance with their documented preferences for two [Residents (R) 111 and R104] of three sampled residents reviewed for food preferences, and for two non-sampled residents (R83 and R50) observed during the tray line. Specifically, R111, R104, R83, and R50 were served food items that were documented as dislikes in their dietary records. This failure resulted in residents receiving meals inconsistent with their stated preferences, potentially affecting their nutritional intake and satisfaction with food services.Findings Include: On 09/02/25 at 09:44 AM, an interview was conducted with R111. R111 stated he has concerns with the food at the facility and not following his preferences. R111 reported the facility sometimes doesn't follow his preferences or substitutions. On 09/02/25 at 12:43 PM, an observation and follow-up interview were conducted with Resident R111 during the lunch meal service. R111 stated he disliked rice and gravy but was served rice and gravy on his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the personal belongings were inventoried upon admission for one [Resident (R) 29] of three sampled for missing property. R29's hearing aids were not identified as missing until greater than one month, resulting in R29's inability to effectively communicate with others. The deficient practice affected the resident's quality of life. Findings include:During an interview on 09/02/2025 at 12:12 PM in R29's room with R29's Family Member (FM), the FM stated that she was concerned because R29 lost her dentures and hearing aids three weeks ago. The FM said, it's very concerning now because they have had her on a pureed diet, but she can eat regular foods when she has her dentures. I'm worried that she has lost or will lose weight because she doesn't like the pureed food. When she has her dentures, she can eat regular foods. Also, her hearing aids are missing. R29 is very alert, but now people think she's confused but it is because she can't hear. Asked…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of one of one resident [Resident (R)78] sampled by not ensuring that the call light was always placed within reach or positioned so that it could be activated. As a result of this deficient practice, R78 was placed at risk of not having his emergent needs met in a timely manner. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility who can activate a call light.Findings include:R78 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term placement. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, quadriplegia (paralysis in all four limbs and torso) and has a tracheostomy (surgical opening in the front of the neck where a tube is inserted into the windpipe to maintain an airway). Recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment on 08/02/2025 revealed R78 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating he is cognitively intact.On 09/02/25 at 10:21…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency (SA) and Adult Protective Services (APS) for one of two residents (Resident (R) 49) sampled for abuse. R49 alleged that two staff members had held her down in bed, at an undetermined time in the past.Findings Include: On 09/03/25 at 09:30 AM, an interview was conducted with R49. R49 reported that, some time ago, two staff members grabbed her, pushed her down, and held her in bed. R49 could not recall the names of the staff members, when the incident occurred, or the reasons for the interaction. However, she identified the staff members as Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs), noting that one of them was blonde and always wore her hair in a ponytail. R49 described feeling violated and attacked, stating that the staff members treated her as though she were crazy. She explained she experiences significant nerve pain, and that their actions were causing her extreme discomfort. R49 mentioned that she had reported the incident to the facility, though she could not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to accurately assess three of four resident's status sampled for Resident Assessment, [Resident (R) 5, R140, and R33]. The facility failed to identify R5's use of a mitten restraint on her right hand, instead identified it as not being used. The facility incorrectly coded R140 as receiving insulin one day a week instead of receiving a GLP-1 receptor antagonist, Trulicity. The facility coded R33 as a low risk for developing a pressure ulcer when in fact she is a high risk for developing a pressure ulcer. The deficient practice could affect all residents in the facility if the facility fails to accurately assess resident's medications, risk for pressure ulcer and use of restraints, incorrectly coding resident's status. Findings include: On 09/02/25 at 10:28 AM, observed R5 lying in bed with her head elevated and a mitten restraint applied to her right hand. Review of R5's Electronic Health Record (EHR) conducted. R5 was a [AGE] year-old…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 45 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for one [Resident (R) 6] of one resident sampled for restraints, The deficient practice could affect all residents at the facility who are using bedrails. Findings Include: On 09/03/25 at 12:13 PM observed R6 in bed with bilateral 1/2 upper bedrails up on her bed. R6 was observed holding onto the rails as she lay in her bed. On 09/04/25 at 02:30 PM requested the Director of Nursing (DON) provide a copy of R6's consent for bedrail use and she stated it is in the resident's restraint physical assessment that was filled out on 07/27/25. The DON also stated the nurse wrote a progress note regarding the conversation with the Resident's daughter giving verbal consent for bedrail use. On 09/04/25 record review of R6's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed an assessment to use the 1/2 upper bedrails was completed on 07/27/25. Reviewed R6's Care Plan (CP) and found the use of bedrails was not included in the care plan. On 09/05/25 at 03:52 PM, interviewed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the care plan for one of two residents investigated for care planning, [Resident (R) 1] was revised by the interdisciplinary team to include interventions to prevent recurring hospitalizations. The resident has had multiple re-hospitalizations within the recent months and was not reflected in his care plan. The deficient practice may impact the resident's quality of life and the right to a dignified existence. Findings Include:Observation on 09/03/2025 at 02:08 PM in R1s room. R1 was lying in his bed and didn't answer make eye contact or speak when asked questions. R1 had a trachea collar that was connected to the mechanical ventilator. Noted a Gastric (G-tube) feeding pump at the bedside and an intravenous (IV) infusion pump on the other side of the bed. R1 was resting with his eyes open. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) on 09/04/25. R1 is an [AGE] year-old male resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] (most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the following for one [Resident (R) 15] of one resident sampled for quality of care: A homelike environment with a comfortable room temperature; provision of adequate personal care of hair, skin and nails; and provision of a water pitcher for hydration between meals. The deficient practice impacted the resident's quality of end-of-life care with a comfortable and dignified existence in the facility. Findings include:Observation and interview with R15 on 09/03/2025 at 10:34 AM in his room. R15 was in an isolation room on transmission-based precautions for a respiratory infection. R15's skin on his arms, hands, legs and feet were dry, scaly and flaky. R15's hair was tousled, and his mustache was over his lip which made him appear disheveled. The nails on his hands were 3/4 inch long, yellow, and thick. Asked if the staff ever trim his hair, shave him or offered to trim his nails. He said he can't shave himself and the nurse said she…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent dehydration for one of one resident's sampled for nutrition/hydration, [Resident (R) 74]. This deficient practice affects residents who rely on staff to provide fluids to maintain proper hydration and health.Findings Include: On 09/02/25 at 10:29 AM, concurrent observation and interview was done. Observed no water pitcher at R74's bedside. Subsequent observation was done at 11:35 AM, and no water pitcher was observed at resident's bedside. An interview was done at 11:37 AM with R74, when asked if she needed water pitcher at her bedside, R74 stated, Yes, I would like to have my own water pitcher. R74 also explained that she feels thirsty at times and has dry lips but was not provided a water pitcher. An interview was done at 11:40 AM with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)103 inside resident's room. Asked if R74 requires a water pitcher in her room and confirmed that the resident is able to pour water from a pitcher without assistance and should have a water pitcher at her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2025-11-19 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promptly, within three days, refer a resident with lost dentures for dental services for one [Resident (R) 150] of two residents sampled for dental services. As a result, R150 did not obtain the option or consult of denture replacement, and her dietary order was downgraded.Findings Include: On 09/02/25 at 09:22 AM, an observation and interview were conducted with R150. R150 reported that her dentures were stolen and needs a new pair. She could not recall how long her dentures have been missing, only that it has been a while. She stated she had informed the facility about the loss and was told the dentist comes to the facility. She has been waiting for a dentist to come for a replacement. R150 explained the missing denture has been affecting her ability to chew while eating. An observation of her room and R150 confirmed the absence of her upper denture.Review of R150 inventory list confirmed R150 had upper dentures upon admission to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement infection prevention and control measures when providing care for residents. The facility did not ensure that staff was wearing applicable personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to a resident on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and improper hand hygiene and glove changes between a dirty and clean task. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for the potential spread of infections and communicable diseases.Findings include:1) On 09/04/25 at 08:14 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN)27 administer medications to Resident (R)5 through her gastrostomy tube. RN27 was wearing a mask and gloves as she administered the medications to R5 but did not wear a gown. On 09/05/25 at 12:53 PM, an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) was conducted in her office. The IP confirmed that staff are to wear a gown, gloves and mask when administering medications through a gastrostomy tube for a Resident who is on enhanced barrier precautions.Review of facility policy titled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a homelike environment. The facility did not remove any of the resident meal trays (an institutional characteristic) after serving residents in the dining room. This deficient practice affects all residents dining in the dining areas. Findings include: On 08/12/24 at 11:55 AM, conducted a dining observation of twelve (12) residents eating lunch in the main dining room on the 1st floor. All 12 residents' meals remained on the meal trays. Inquired with Resident (R)138 and the resident's Family Member (FM)1 if it was their preference for the resident's meal to remain directly on the tray for the entirety of the meal. FM1 reported that they were not given the option to have the food taken off the cafeteria style trays, staff just always leave it on the trays. Inquired with Dining Staff (DS)3 regarding residents' meals being served and remaining on the cafeteria style tray throughout the meal service. DS3 confirmed all the residents dining in the 1st floor dining room have their meals on the tray. Asked if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-08-15 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure posted nurse staffing information was in clear and in an identifiable and prominent place. As a result of this deficient practice, residents and resident representatives are not informed of the number of staff available for resident care. Findings include: 1) On 08/13/24 at 10:55 AM, conducted observations of daily staff posting at the entrance of the building and on all four (4) units. Near the entrance of the building, after the screener's station, Daily Staff Posting is posted on a bulletin board along with the employee clock in/out system, a Stay up to Date with your Covid Vaccine poster, Cover your Cough poster, August 2024 Employee Calendar, Mandatory CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) Meeting, and a list of employees who need to see the Director of Nursing (DON) prior to starting the shift. The 24-hour-Daily Staff Posting form was printed on what appeared to be an 11-inch (in) x 13 in paper. The print was small, and this surveyor was unable to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and serve food in accordance with professional standard for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to place facility residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings include: 1) A concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 08/12/24 at 08:27 AM in the facility kitchen. One of the refrigerators contained a container of rice porridge with a discard date of 08/11/24. Dietary Director (DD) stated that it should have been discarded since the kitchen staff performs audits twice a day. Review of the facility policy titled, Food Receiving and Storage, with a revised date of 10/2017, was conducted. The facility policy documented, Food shall be received and stored in a manner that complies with safe food handling practices. 2) Concurrent observation and interview were conducted with the Dietary Aide (DA) 1 on 08/12/24 at 08:53 AM. DA1 was observed checking the dishwasher sanitizer with a quality assurance strip. When asked if she logs the results, DA1 stated that kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for one of the sampled residents (Resident (R) 415). This failed practice had a negative affect on R415's psychosocial well being and has the potential to affect all the residents in the facility. Findings include: Interview was conducted with R415 on 08/12/24 at 09:22 AM in R415's room. R415 stated that on multiple occasions, the staff would pull the privacy curtains from around her bed while providing personal care to her roommate. R415 stated that pulling the curtain from her side to provide privacy to her roommate ends up exposing her to individuals passing in the hallway. Interview was conducted with R415 on 08/13/24 at 09:04 AM in R415's room. R415 stated that on 08/12/24, she was exposed to the other resident in the room as well as individuals passing in the hallway. Observation was made on 08/13/24 at 09:16 AM in R415's room. While R415 was talking to State Agency (SA), Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 62 was observed pulling one of the privacy curtains near the entrance of the room/R415's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for one resident (Resident (R)31) sampled. After filing a complaint with the facility regarding the Alleged Perpetrator's (AP) treatment of R31, AP was informed not to have any form of contact with the resident. Following this instruction, R31 reported to the Assistant Administrator (AADM) that AP had verbally confronted and intimidated him while he was alone in his room. AADM confirmed that he did not identify AP's confrontation and intimidation of R31 as potential abuse, and did not initiate an investigation into the incident. As a result of AP confronting R31 about the initial complaint, R31 reported feeling unsafe, fearful of additional retaliation from AP, increased anxiousness, hypervigilance with loss of sleep, and violent nightmares of having to defend himself from AP. As a result of this deficient practice, the resident was not kept safe while allegations were thoroughly investigated.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of potential abuse to the Administrator of the facility, the State Agency (SA), and Adult Protective Services in accordance with State law through established procedures. R31 reported to the Assistant Administrator (AADM) that a staff member [alleged perpetrator (AP)] confronted him about an initial complaint he had made about AP. AADM confirmed the incident was not identified as potential abuse, and because of not identifying it as possible abuse, it was not reported accordingly. Findings include: (Cross reference to F585, F600, F610) R31 is a [AGE] year-old resident, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for physical and occupational therapy to improve his level of functioning. R31's diagnoses include sepsis, cellulitis (skin infection that appears red and swollen) of upper limb, hypertension, a history of falling, and a need for assistance with personal care, weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of R31's Electronic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of potential abuse for one resident (Resident (R)31) sampled. R31 reported to the Assistant Administrator (AADM) that a staff member confronted and intimidated him about a complaint he made about the staff member. AADM confirmed the incident was not identified as potential abuse and an investigation into the incident was not initiated. Findings include: (Cross reference to F585, F600, F609) R31 is a [AGE] year-old resident, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for physical and occupational therapy to improve the resident's level of functioning. R31's diagnoses include sepsis, cellulitis (skin infection that appears red and swollen) of upper limb, hypertension, a history of falling, and a need for assistance with personal care, weakness, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of R31's Electronic Health Records (EHR) documented a Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with an Assessment Refence Date (ARD) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to correctly document the presence of a stage three pressure ulcer in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) for one Resident (R) 56 of 32 in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, R56 was not properly coded which could affect the resident's care plan and potential outcomes. All residents have the potential to be affected. Findings include: R56 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnoses that include anoxic brain damage, muscle weakness, contractures of left and right forearm muscle, stage three pressure injury to the sacrum . per record review (RR) of face sheet. RR of a skin & wound evaluation, dated 08/12/2024, noted the following documentation: Stage three to sacrum. present on admission. 0.3 centimeters (cm) long 0.2 cm wide no undermining or depth. No tunneling. Wound healing is slow or stalled but stable, little/no deterioration. Generic wound cleanser with foam dressing . Minimum Data Set (MDS)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to implement the care plan for two Residents, (R)126 and R218, of 32 residents in the sample. R126 was not repositioned at least every two hours to promote healing of his pressure ulcer and R218 was not routinely repositioned or transferred to a wheelchair. The deficient practice placed the residents at risk for a decline in their functional and physical health status. All residents who are dependent on staff have the potential to be affected. Findings include: Cross reference to F686. R126 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis that includes heart failure; septicemia; wound infection and an unhealed stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, per Record Review (RR) of the face sheet. During random observations of Resident (R)126 in his room on the following days and times: 08/12/24 at 09:07 AM and 2:00 PM; 08/13/24 at 09:15 AM; 11:30 AM; 2:00 PM and 3:45 PM; 08/14/24 at 08:45 AM, 11:38 AM, 1:45 PM, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the healing and prevent infection of an existing stage four pressure ulcer for one Resident (R) 126. R126 required maximum assistance and was not repositioned off of the wound at least every two hours. The deficient practice places placed the resident at risk of worsening a stage four pressure injury. All residents who require maximum assistance from staff have the potential to be affected. Findings include: R126 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis that includes heart failure; septicemia; wound infection and an unhealed stage four pressure ulcer of the sacral region, per Record Review (RR) of the face sheet. Observation and interview with R126 in his room on 08/12/24 at 09:04 AM. R126 was in his bed on his back with the head of bed up 45 degrees. R126 said that he used to walk pretty well before but now I'm in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the care to maintain or improve the highest level of range of motion and mobility for one Resident (R) 218 of 32 in the sample. The resident was not routinely repositioned and placed up in the chair daily as ordered by the physician. The deficient practice placed the resident at an increase risk of a decline in functional status. Findings include: R218 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that includes depression, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis (weakness) per Record Review (RR) of face sheet. Observation of R218 in her room on 08/12/24 at 10:15 AM. R218's laying on her back with her bed flat, her right leg started shaking. Facial grimacing noted and an adhesive patch on her left knee. Observation of R218 on 08/12/24 at 2:33 PM. The resident was observed on her back in bed, with a contracture of her left arm, non-verbal, moaning and grimacing, and when asked if she was having pain, she moaned…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented specific competencies necessary for resident safety. This deficient practice has the potential for harm. Findings include: On 08/14/24 at 09:00 AM, while waiting to check a medication cart on Unit 4, observed Registered Nurse (RN)10 dispose of a medication tablet in the trash bin (unlocked, unsecure) located on the side of the medication cart. The medication landed on the top of other trash which was visible and accessible to anyone passing the medication cart. Inquired if it was okay to dispose of the medication tablet in the trash bin at the side of the medication cart which was unsecured and unable to be locked. RN10 stated she would have to check on how she was supposed to dispose of that medication. RN10 confirmed she disposed of a tablet of Aspirin 81 mg (milligrams) on the side of the medication cart and remained unsure of how to properly dispose of the medication. As RN10 and this surveyor were discussing RN10 disposing of the medication in an unsecure/unlocked trash bin, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and reconciled on 1 of 4 units in the facility. This deficient practice increases the risk for diversion of resident medications. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 08/14/24 at 07:38 AM at the nurses' station on the second floor. Registered Nurse (RN)24 was observed preparing medications for a resident. The medication cart she was using was unlocked and RN24 was accessing the medications contained in the medication cart. A review of the facility's document titled, Controlled Item Checklist, dated August, was conducted on 08/14/24 at 07:49 AM. The sheet did not contain the outgoing night shift nurse and the incoming day shift nurses' signatures for August 14, 2024, in the 07:00 AM boxes. RN24 was informed of the missing signatures. RN24 stated that it should have been signed earlier with the outgoing night shift nurse. On 08/14/24 at 07:57 AM, RN24 and RN20 were both observed signing the facility's,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician, the facility's medical director, and/or director of nursing acted upon irregularities the pharmacist reported during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) for two of five residents sampled (Resident (R) 67 and R110). The attending physician did not document in the medical record that the identified irregularities had been reviewed, nor did he/she document the rationale for the no change in medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy and procedure Medication Regimen Reviews, revised in May 2019, documented The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it .Copies of medication regimen review reports, including physician responses, are maintained as part of the permanent medical record. 1) During review of R67's Electronic Health Record (EHR), under the pharmacist note in progress notes, the pharmacist documented for MRR 07/31/24 to see report. Review of documented MRRs uploaded in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's food preference/request was followed for one of four residents sampled (Resident (R) 106). R106 requested white bread for every meal and did not get white bread for every meal. Findings include: On 08/12/24 at 10:45 AM, during an interview with R106 at the bedside, resident reported she spoke with the facility's dietician and requested to have milk every morning and plain white bread every meal but has not been getting her request. R106 did not understand why she needed to ask for milk and white bread every day. On 08/12/24 at 12:36 PM, observed R106's lunch tray to not have plain white bread. R106 stated no bread again and brought out a half a slice of white bread from the top of her nightstand kept in a cup that she saved from the morning and said, good thing I kept one. Reviewed R106's meal card for lunch on her meal tray which documented + 2 SLICES BREAD DAILY (untoasted). On 08/13/24 at 08:24 AM and 08/14/24 at 08:44 AM, observed R106 eating breakfast with bread and milk on her plate,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on 1 of 32 residents sampled, that were accurately documented. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident (R)313 was placed at risk for a decrease in quality and competency of care. In addition, based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep a resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) confidential. This deficient practice places residents' EHRs at risk for violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). Findings include: 1) Resident (R)313 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term rehabilitation. R313's admitting diagnoses include, but are not limited to, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia (an absence of enough oxygen in the tissues to sustain bodily functions), epilepsy, and esophageal (tube that runs from the throat to the stomach) obstruction. As a result of his admitting diagnoses, R313 was admitted with a tracheostomy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-15 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Binding Arbitration Agreements ([NAME]) they asked the residents (or their representatives) to enter into, were explained in a form and manner that they could understand. This is evidenced by 1 of 3 residents or resident representatives (of Resident 63) sampled stating she did not have the BAA explained to her in a way that she understood what it meant. Findings include: On 08/13/24 at 12:00 PM, an interview was done with the resident representative/family member (FM3) for Resident (R)63 at his bedside. During a concurrent review of a copy of the signed BAA and being asked if she recognized it, FM3 reported that she believed it was a form in a bunch of forms that had been sent to her to sign once when R63 was being re-admitted from the acute care hospital. FM3 also reported that she could not recall the form being explained to her and stated that she wasn't sure what it was for. After the state agency (SA) explained the BAA form to her, FM3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment to prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two of six residents sampled for infection control (Resident (R) 126 and R85). R85's humidifier bottle was not properly secured to the oxygen concentrator. During R126 sacral wound dressing change, the nurse didn't sanitize hands after removing dirty gloves and before putting on clean gloves. This failure could place the resident at risk for infection. Findings include: 1) On 08/12/24 at 08:38 AM, during an observation of R85's room, observed R85 on oxygen, oxygen contractor running, and the humidifier bottle had broken off tape around it and was taped on the bottom sticking to the ground. The rubber band that secured the humidifier bottle to the concentrator was broken and there was tape around the concentrator. R85 reported the humidifier bottle was taped to the concentrator this morning but it fell off and he…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medical record that was accurately documented for one of three residents in the sample. Two entries documented in the electronic medical record stated the resident's fractured shoulder was the right shoulder when the injury occurred in the left shoulder. A third entry documented the resident was transferred to the wrong acute care hospital. The deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Findings include: Electronic medical record (EMR) reviewed for Resident (R)1. admission note: 12/20/2023 at 22:28 .Left arm swollen. With elastic bandage and sling in place. Skilled nursing note: Registered Nurse (RN)10. 12/23/2023 14:18. Patient (Pt.) alert oriented x3 verbalizing appropriately .right arm swelling noted, brace and sling in place, placed pillow under to have extremity elevated . Skilled Nursing note: RN25. 12/24/2023 at 18:25 .pt. alert and oriented x 3. Verbalizing appropriately, .Right arm swelling, and discoloration noted. Pulses noted arm warm to touch . General…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and policy review, the facility failed to protect and promote quality of life for 4 of 5 residents sampled (Residents (R)29, 52, 75, and 1) by making sure that they were treated with respect and dignity. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that English was consistently spoken in all resident care areas, exposing R1 to frustrating situations. R29 handling R29 roughly while providing care despite resident's request to be gentle. R52 and R75 both reported having to wait 30 minutes to 1 hour for staff to respond and/or acknowledge the resident after activating their call light. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: 1) On 08/07/23 at 11:43 AM, conducted an interview with R29 regarding staff treating the resident with respect and dignity. R29 reported there are some staff that are rough when they clean her down there (providing peri care). R29 explained that she had surgery down there and I have to remind the staff more than once to be gentle. R29 reported that it is not very respectful when you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 3 of 5 residents sampled (Residents (R)1, 74, and 100) by ensuring that their call lights were always placed within reach. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents were placed at risk of not having their needs identified and met in a timely manner. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility who can activate a call light, or have it activated on their behalf. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)1 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R1's active diagnoses include but are not limited to quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), respiratory failure, and dependence on a respirator (ventilator) for breathing. A review of his most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/25/23 revealed that R1 was determined to have a Brief Interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards. Proper labeling of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications. Findings include: On 08/09/23 at 08:49 AM, an inspection of the Ventilator Care Unit (VCU) medication cart #3 was done with licensed practical nurse (LPN)1. Observed in the 3rd drawer of the cart were the following unlabeled bottles of over-the-counter (OTC) vitamins/supplements: 1 open bottle of Tangy Tangerine Tablets 2.0 1 open bottle Z-Stack vitamin 1 closed bottle Z-Stack vitamin Interview done with LPN1 revealed the unlabeled bottles were medications (with accompanying physician orders) for Resident (R)9. LPN1 stated that R9's family brings the medications in from the outside, and that the facility holds and administers them from the medication cart. LPN1 confirmed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in accordance with standards for food safety. As a result of this deficient practice, all resident have the potential to be affected and experience harm. Findings include: 1) On 08/07/23 at 08:44 AM, during the initial brief tour of the kitchen, observed an open box of [NAME] Beef Patty and an open bag of diced potatoes (in an unlabeled box) in the freezer. The beef patties and diced potatoes were both open to the freezer air and appeared to have freezer burn. The Dietary Director (DD)1 was present and confirmed the open bags of beef patties and diced potatoes should have been sealed properly, but was not, and both items were freezer burnt. DD1 removed the beef patties and diced potatoes from the freezer. 2) On 08/09/23 at 11:37 AM, during a follow-up visit to the kitchen, observed staff plating resident's lunches. Observed a pot on the stove that contained cooked chicken (alternative/special request) which was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to secure an electrical panel on Nursing Unit 4. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility put the safety and well-being of the residents as well as the public at risk for accident hazards. Findings include: During an observation of Nursing Unit 4 on 10/07/23 at 10:00 AM, the electrical panel was not secured. The panel contained electrical circuit switches numbered one to thirty five. No staff members were in the immediate vicinity to prevent any residents and/or visitors from accessing the electrical panel. Second observation of Nursing Unit 4 on 10/08/23 at 11:00 AM showed the same electrical panel was not secured. Again, no staff members were in the immediate vicinity to prevent any residents and/or visitors from accessing the electrical panel. During staff inquiry on 10/09/23 at 08:30 AM, the Administrator acknowledged that the electrical panel should have been secured. Administrator stated that they would immediately have the electrical panel secured/locked.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review (RR), the facility failed to identify and support 2 of 2 residents sampled (Residents (R)1 and 65) preference to be gotten up out of bed daily. As a result of this deficient practice, these residents did not have their needs met and were placed at risk of not attaining their highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)1 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R1's active diagnoses include but are not limited to quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), respiratory failure, and dependence on a respirator (ventilator) for breathing. A review of his most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 05/25/23 revealed that R1 was determined to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, meaning he was found to be cognitively intact. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, homelike environment for one out of 49 residents sampled (Resident (R) 88). This deficient practice has a negative effect on resident's quality of life and places her at risk for psychosocial harm. Findings Include: R88 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observation and interview were conducted on 08/07/23 at 02:11 PM. R88 stated, My neighbor's snacks are all over the place. I don't like seeing it all! The curtains need to be washed. It has not been washed since I have been here. It smells bad. An observation was made on a tear in the curtain that created a 5inch-by-5inch hole. To the right of R88's television are shelves, tables, large plastic storage bins, and stackable trays. These items contained food, packing boxes, plants, pillows, blankets, paper goods, and drinks. The items are stacked on top of one another creating a 5-foot-high pile. Some of the bins are overflowing with items that could potentially…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to document ongoing re-evaluation of the need for restraints for one out of four residents sampled (Resident (R) 429). This deficient practice places the resident at risk for psychosocial harm. Findings Include: R429 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observations were conducted at various times between the dates 08/07/23-08/10/23. R429 had his mitten restraint on throughout the four-day span. Interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 25 on 08/09/23 at 01:34 PM near the nurse's station. RN25 stated that R429's mitten is supposed to be released every two hours. RN also mentioned that she only completes the flowsheet and has not charted in the progress notes regarding R429's restraint use. Interview was conducted with Unit Manager (UM) 3 on 08/09/24 at 02:58 PM. UM3 stated that charting in the progress notes should be done every shift especially regarding restraints. After reviewing R429's Electronic Health…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and document review, the facility failed to report one reportable event of suspected resident (Resident (R)52) abuse event to the State Agency (SA) and Adult Protective Services (APS) within 2 hours of the incident if serious bodily injury is present, as mandated by state law. On 03/28/23 it was reported to the facility that R52 had an injury to the right shoulder which was red, swollen, and could not move his/her arm. R52 was allegedly abuse by Facility Staff (FS)4. As a result of this deficient practice the SA did not have information to determine if an investigation by their agency was needed, and there is the potential incidents are not thoroughly investigated, putting all residents of potential abuse at risk. Findings include: (Cross Reference to F600 Allegation of Abuse; F610 Conducting a Thorough Investigation; and F676 Maintain Abilities) The definition of Willful as defined at 485.5 in the definition of abuse and means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The definition of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure further potential for abuse was prevented and a completed report was submitted to the State Agency (SA) within 5 days of the incident. Facility Staff (FS)7 partially dislocated Resident (R)52's right (R) shoulder while attempting to reposition the resident. Applying the federal and state definitions of willful and abuse, the SA found the facility to not be in compliance with regulations and identified the incident as abuse. The facility did not identify the incident as abuse and therefore did not remove the staff from providing care and submitted the completed report 6 days after the incident. Findings include: (Cross Reference to F609 Reporting an Allegation on Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation; F610 Conducting a Thorough Investigation; and F676 Maintain Abilities) The definition of Willful as defined at 485.5 in the definition of abuse and means the individual must have acted deliberately, not that the individual must have intended to inflict injury or harm. The definition of Abuse as defined at 483.5 as the willful…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to properly document a transfer summary to be received by an acute care provider for one resident (R), R378, out of a sample of two residents. This deficient practice fails to inform the receiving acute care provider of the care needed by the resident and does not allow R378 a smooth transfer to the acute care provider from the facility. Finding includes: Record review of R378's electronic health record (EHR). Minimum Data Set (MDS) with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/05/22 revealed that R378 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from a hospital. R378 had the following medical diagnoses: irregular heart rate, heart failure (a weakened heart that cannot supply the body with enough oxygen), an active cancer of a type of white blood cells (WBCs) that produce antibodies to help the body fight off infections, an anemia (low blood cell count) where the bone marrow cannot produce new WBCs, red blood cells (RBCs, provides oxygen to all cells in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely review and revision of the Resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) included his family representative/healthcare surrogate for 1 of 3 residents (Resident (R)84) in the sample. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have all the information necessary to effectively address the resident's status, condition, and/or needs adequately so that he could meet his highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)84 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R84's active diagnoses include but are not limited to a personal history of traumatic brain injury, chronic respiratory failure, and functional quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso). R84 does not speak and is incapable of voluntary movement of his limbs or head. In addition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure two residents' abilities in activities of daily living are not diminished. Facility Staff (FS)7 repositioned R52 by pulling the resident's arm resulting in a subluxation (partial dislocation) of the resident's right (R) shoulder. Prior to the incident, R52 could walk approximately 100 feet with minimal assistance and was in the process of finding appropriate discharge placement after the incident the resident is unable to walk and is not receiving restorative services to help maintain his/her strength to walk. As a result of this deficient practice, all residents needing restorative services are at a for potential risk of harm. Findings include: (Cross Reference to F600 Allegation of Abuse; F609 Reporting an Allegation on Abuse/Neglect/Misappropriation; and F610 Conducting a Thorough Investigation) The facility's completed report for ACT#10193 was reported to the SA via email on 04/04/23 documented, On 3/28/23 Resident was being repositioned in bed by staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review and staff interview, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to prevent urinary tract infection for one out of four residents (Resident (R) 43) sampled. This deficient practice exposes the resident to possible infection causing contaminants and has the potential to affect all residents with urinary catheters. Findings Include: On 08/07/23 at 09:58 AM, during initial observations, R43 was lying supine in bed with head elevated watching television. Observed R43 had a urinary catheter draining light yellow urine into a covered drainage bag that was on the floor. After initial observation of all 47 residents in the unit was completed, noted the drainage bag was still on the floor at the following times: 11:12 AM, 11:44 AM, 12:29 AM, 01:33 PM and 2:42 PM. On 08/08/23 at 08:20 AM, observed urinary catheter drainage bag was on the floor. Record review revealed that a urine analysis (urine test to check for infections) was done on 08/08/23. Further review revealed that R43 already had a urinary tract infection in June 2023. On 08/09/23 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate treatment and services to assess an identified complication, and prevent further potential complications related to enteral tube-feedings (TF) for 1 of 3 residents sampled (Resident (R)84). As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed the resident at risk for continued avoidable complications. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility receiving enteral feedings. Findings include: Resident (R)84 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R84's active diagnoses include but are not limited to a personal history of traumatic brain injury, chronic respiratory failure, and functional quadriplegia (a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso). R84 does not speak and is incapable of voluntary movement of his limbs or head, and is dependent on enteral tube-feedings (TF) for all nutrition. In addition, R84 does not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure nurse competency in medication administration as evidenced by an extended release tablet being crushed and administered to a resident. This deficient practice places the residents at risk for avoidable declines in health status and decreased quality of care and has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility receiving crushed medications. Findings include: On 08/09/23 at 07:51 AM, medication pass observations were done with licensed practical nurse (LPN)1 as she prepared and administered medications for Resident (R)25. Observed LPN1 remove a potassium chloride ER (extended release) 10mEq (milliequivalent) tablet from the blister pack and place it into a medication cup. The blister pack had a bold pharmacy label prominently placed that read Do not crush . A minute later, after LPN1 had prepared the other 6 medications for R25, LPN1 proceeded to crush the potassium chloride ER tablet. At 08:01 AM, the crushed potassium chloride was administered via a gastric tube to R25. At 08:18 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that records for controlled medications are in order and that an accurate account is maintained and reconciled. The staff did not document the actual amount of medication in the container and signed off on medications not yet administered. As a result of this deficiency, there is a potential for the diversion of controlled medications. Findings include: 1) On 08/09/23 at 08:20 AM, conducted an inspection of a medication cart with Nursing Staff (NS)34. Review of the Controlled Medication Sign-Off sheet documented NS34 had pre-signed the sheet of the count that is to be preformed with the on-coming evening shift nurse later in the day. NS34 confirmed the sheet controlled medications sheet was pre-signed and should not have been, it should have been signed in the presence of and witnessed by the on-coming shift immediately after the count was verified as accurate. The purpose of the on-coming and off-going nurses conducting and verifying the controlled medication count serves as part of the facility's system to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication regimen irregularities were identified, reported, and addressed for 1 of 5 residents sampled (Resident (R)74). As a result of this deficient practice, the resident was placed at risk of avoidable complications related to his documented medication allergies. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility receiving medications. Findings include: Resident (R)74 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. R74's active diagnoses include but are not limited to chronic respiratory failure, and dependence on a respirator (ventilator) for breathing. On 08/09/23 at 10:33 AM, during a record review of his electronic health record (EHR), the following orders were noted: 05/11/23 Trazodone HCl [hydrochloride] Oral Tablet 50 MG [milligrams] (Trazodone HCl) Give 0.5 tablet by mouth as needed for Sleep. For 6 months at bedtime. Hold for sedation. 06/23/23 AVOID trazodone and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on 1 of 36 residents sampled (Resident (R)25) that were complete and accurately documented. As a result of this deficient practice, the medication administration record (MAR) for R25 was incorrect until the state agency (SA) pointed out the discrepancy. Timely and accurate medical record documentation, especially of medications administered, is essential for the care of any resident. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: On 08/09/23 at 07:51 AM, medication pass observations were done with licensed practical nurse (LPN)1 as she prepared and administered medications for Resident (R)25. Observed LPN1 administer and/or attempt to administer 7 medications to R25. 6 medications were given via her gastric tube. The seventh medication was a mouth rinse that LPN1 tried to administer, however R25 did not tolerate even the small amount attempted via a disposable oral swab, so LPN1 wasted most of it. At 09:30 AM, while attempting to verify if LPN1 had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to perform proper hand hygiene and follow infection control processes. This deficient practice places the residents and visitors at risk for the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate protective and preventive measures for communicable diseases and infections. This is evidenced by the facility failing to ensure staff followed transmission-based precautions (TBP) by wearing the proper personal protective equipment (PPE), as well as follow standard precautions by performing hand hygiene in between glove changes. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all residents in the facility, as well as all healthcare personnel, and visitors at the facility. Findings include: 1) Observation was conducted on 08/07/23 at 08:14 AM near the front entrance on the first floor. Infection Preventionist (IP) was performing rapid Covid testing to facility visitors. IP swabbed the first surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$8,018 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $8,018 — penalty dated 2024-08-15
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PARK MARINO CONVALESCENT CENTER, INC. | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 03/31/2008 |
| DARLEY, SUZANNE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 27% | since 02/02/2012 |
| EBER, JEANNE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 14% | since 11/11/1998 |
| RODGERS, MARCIA | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | 27% | since 06/17/2021 |
| SCHERMAN, DAVID | Individual | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 8% | since 12/23/2024 |
| CASPARIS, LAUREN | Individual | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 05/06/2011 |
| ALBERS, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/26/1995 |
| FENDEL, CRAIG | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/21/2017 |
| GEORGE, DENNIS | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 09/09/2014 |
| POWERS, CAMMIE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/22/2011 |
| RABIN, KATHERINE | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 09/21/2017 |
| KHALIFA, MOHAMMED | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/16/2021 |
| REDWOOD HOSPITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 03/01/1999 |
| RESIWAIN, MARLEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/10/2025 |
| YAZAWA, KIYOTAKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 72% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in HI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125019. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.