No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hale Makua - Kahului

472 Kaulana Street, Kahului, HI 96732 · Non profit - Other · 252 certified beds · (808) 877-2761 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$170,249 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $170,249 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-18)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
547 Kaulana St
Pharmacy
275 W Kaahumanu Ave · (808) 871-6268 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
90 S Kane St · (808) 877-2808 · Call to confirm hours
Park
275 Uhu St · (808) 270-7232 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.5%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.3%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection3.6%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%1.9%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.4%20.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.8%9.1%18.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.7%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control18.8%17.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.5%11.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%84.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.6%19.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.2%10.3%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.761.091.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.680.881.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

70.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 197 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

70.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.19U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.10hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 19% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF70.2%CMS range 64.4–75.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.5%CMS range 7.6–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 3.9–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.75
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.87
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.14
RN hoursweekends
32.2%
Total nursing turnover
20.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 252 beds and averages 213.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 38 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.47 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.11 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.61 to 1.14 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-09)
14
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-18)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 43 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review (RR), the facility failed to follow the proper washing and sanitizing practices for the dishes and silverware to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illnesses as evidenced by wash and final rinse temperatures of the water in the High Temperature Dishwasher (using heat sanitization) that were well below the temperatures recommended for safety by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, Food and Drug Administration Food Code (https://www.fda.gov/media/110822/download), in addition to not monitoring that the proper temperatures were being maintained as evidenced by no retrievable documentation of temperatures since 10/01/23. As a result of this deficient practice, patient safety was compromised, and an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified. The State Agency (SA) identified an IJ on 10/17/23 at 10:03 AM (with the start of the IJ later determined as 10/01/23). On 10/17/23 at 11:37 AM, the Administrator was notified of the IJ at 483.60…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-18 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, failed to ensure one resident's right to be free from abuse. R106 hit R141 in her legs with his wheelchair, then left laughing. R141 sustained a 10 cm x 10 cm blue/purple discoloration on the left medial knee and 0.5cm x 0.5 cm light red mark on the left leg just below knee and reported to staff that she was going to her room because she was feeling unsafe because R106 hit her. As a result of this deficient practice, residents in the presence of R106 have the potential for abuse and more than minimal harm. Findings include: Review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #11157, documented on 08/21/24 at 01:15 PM, R141 reported R106 hit her with his wheelchair, reversed the wheelchair then propelled away from the resident laughing. R141 reported that both resident's knees contacted each other when R106 banged her. Staff assessed R141 and documented a 10 cm x 10 cm blue/purple discoloration on the left medical knee and 0.5 cm x 0.5 cm light red mark on the left leg just below R141's knee. R141 reported that she does not feel safe and R106…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, Electronic Health Record (EHR) review and policy review the facility failed to assess pain prior to and manage one Resident (R) of the sampled, R252's pain during a dressing change for his stage 4 pressure ulcer (PU) on his right buttock. The deficient practice prevented R252 from attaining and maintaining his highest level of wellbeing. Findings Include: On 10/17/24 at 01:40 PM spoke with Registered Nurse (RN) 26 and inquired if she had done the dressing change for R99. She confirmed she had already done the dressing change to R99's feet/legs. Inquired if she was going to do a dressing change soon and RN26 stated she was going to do a dressing change for R252. On 10/17/24 at 01:50 PM observed dressing change for R252's stage 4 PU to his right buttock. RN26, RN30 and Advance Practice Registered Nurse RX (APRN RX) 1 were present in R252's room for the dressing change. R252 was assisted with turning onto his left side by RN26 and RN30 and his clothing and adult brief was pulled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document and record review, the facility failed to provide the appropriate supervision and put interventions in place to prevent one Resident (R)1 with moderate cognitive impairment from elopement, resulting in harm. Although R1 exhibited exit seeking behavior on [DATE], he was able to leave the premises in his truck on [DATE]. R1 got lost and was returned to the facility approximately five and a half hours later by the local police department. As a result of the elopement, R1 suffered psychological and physical harm. R1 was afraid when police found him. When returned to the facility, he was cold, and both feet were swollen. In addition, the facility did not follow their own elopement risk program which endangered R1's health and/or safety as well as putting the public at serious risk when R1 drove a vehicle. Findings include: 1) On 07 27/2024, the Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received a Facility Reported Incident (FRI), #11099 that included the following: R1 is a [AGE] year old…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 8 residents (R) in the sample were free from accident hazards. R149 was not kept safe from being grabbed by another resident with a known history of this behavior. As a result of this deficient practice, R149 suffered a potentially avoidable accident with injury. Despite having been identified as a high falls risk upon admission in 2021, R133 did not have a Falls Care Plan added to his Comprehensive Care Plan until after he suffered an unwitnessed fall with multiple major injuries in June 2023. R110 was found to have a cigarette lighter on his bedside table. Placing residents at risk of avoidable accidents and injuries by not providing the appropriate planning and monitoring, and/or implementing the interventions to meet their identified needs is a deficient practice that has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)149 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services (reassessing the residents' dietary/nutritional needs, consistently implementing related care-planned interventions, monitoring for effectiveness, and ensuring coordination of care among the interdisciplinary team) to prevent significant weight loss for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 153 and 147) in the sample, despite having identified them as at risk for compromised nutrition. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed these residents at risk for avoidable declines and injuries. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)153 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R153's admitting diagnoses include, but are not limited to, dementia, high blood pressure, complete AV [atrioventricular] heart block (when the electrical signal that controls your heartbeat is completely blocked requiring a pacemaker),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview and review of policy, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity and respect for one of three residents (Resident (R) 150) reviewed for dignity. As a result of this deficiency, R150 was not promoted the right to the maintenance or enhancement of her quality of life.Findings Include: During resident interview on 01/07/26 at 10:11 AM, R150 relayed the following concerns: Staff took a long time to answer the call light (up to 30 minutes), would say they would be back and never return or would say just go in your pad; referring to urinating in incontinence underwear. R150 felt ignored and not treated with dignity because of this.Review of facility policy on call light use read: Purpose, to respond promptly to resident's call for assistance. Procedure, all facility personnel must be aware of call lights at all times, answer all call lights promptly whether or not you are assigned to the resident. Answer call lights in a prompt, calm, courteous manner, turn off the call light as soon as you enter the room, if you cannot provide the service, go get…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan addressing the presence of a pacemaker for one of one resident (Resident (R) 10) reviewed with a pacemaker. This puts R10 at risk of cardiac complications due to lack of individualize care planning related to the pacemaker.Findings Include:On 01/07/26 at 09:10 AM, an interview with Family Member (FM) 2 and FM3 was conducted. FM2 reported R10 underwent surgery in December for pacemaker generator replacement.Review of R10's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a cardiac pacemaker in place. Documented diagnoses included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease without dyskinesia and atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectoris (plaque buildup in the heart's arteries without chest pain).Review of R10's cardiologist consultation form dated 11/12/25 indicated that R10 carried a diagnosis of Sick Sinus Syndrome (a heart rhythm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for one of four residents (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for range of motion (ROM). R10's restorative nursing program (RNP) care plan was not revised following a pacemaker surgery that resulted in suspension of restorative services. This failure placed R10 at risk for not achieving preventative goals including maintaining strength, balance, and transfer ability, and for experiencing complication related to immobility. Findings Include:Cross Reference to F684, Quality of Care. The facility failed to communicate R10's post-operation status within departments to ensure R10 received continuous treatment and care, as soon as practicable. R10's RNP was not followed up on after the facility received documentation from the cardiologist indicating that R10 could resume normal arm movement. On 01/07/26 at 09:10 AM, an interview with Family Member (FM) 2 and FM3 was conducted. FM2 reported R10 underwent surgery in December for pacemaker generator replacement and that the facility had suspended R10's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to communicate a resident's post-operation status within departments to ensure resident received continuous treatment and care, as soon as practicable, for one of four residents (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for range of motion (ROM). Specifically, R10's restorative nursing program (RNP) was not followed up on after the facility received documentation from the cardiologist indicating that R10 could resume normal arm movement. This failure placed R10 at risk for not achieving preventative goals including maintaining strength, balance, and transfer ability, and for experiencing complication related to immobility. Findings Include:On 01/07/26 at 09:10 AM, an interview with Family Member (FM) 2 and FM3 was conducted. FM2 reported R10 underwent surgery in December for pacemaker generator replacement and that the facility had suspended R10's RNP services. FM2 stated that during R10's post-procedure cardiology follow-up on 12/17/25, the cardiologist cleared R10 to resume exercises. FM2 stated he followed up with a staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment/services to maintain and/or prevent a decline in range of motion (ROM) for one of three residents (Resident (R) 160) sampled for limited ROM. This deficient practice puts the resident at risk for decline in ROM and further contractures. Findings Include:On 01/06/26 at 11:13 AM, observed R160 lying in bed, supine with head slightly elevated and both arms against his chest area. Both hands were also bent on the wrists and angled down towards his feet. No splints or braces were observed to both upper extremities. On 01/07/26 at 11:00 AM and 02:30 PM, R160 was observed lying in bed without any splints, braces or pads to his upper extremities. R160 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted for long-term placement on 09/02/25. Diagnoses included, but not limited to, cerebral palsy (group of conditions that affect movement and posture) and cognitive communication deficit. R160 was admitted with contractures to both upper…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision and/or measures were in place to prevent accidents for one of one resident (Resident (R) 172) reviewed for elopement risk. As a result of this failure, R172 was able to elope from the facility without staff knowledge and arrived at a family member's home with assistance from another resident's visitor. Findings Include:R172 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia, osteoarthritis of the right and left shoulders, spinal stenosis in lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, pain in the right and left feet, unsteadiness on feet, and a history of falls. Review of R172's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), Assessment Reference Date (ARD) 09/12/25, revealed in Section GG (Functional Abilities and Goals) that the resident used a wheelchair for mobility and had impairment of one lower extremity. In Section E (Behavior), the resident was documented to wander, with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent dehydration for one of three residents (Resident (R) 5) sampled for hydration, despite identifying the resident as at risk for compromised nutrition and hydration. This deficient practice puts R5 at risk of complications due to dehydration. Findings Include:On 01/06/26 at 10:14 AM, concurrent observation and interview with R5 at bedside. Resident was seen sitting in his wheelchair at bedside. No water container observed on the bedside table. When R5 was asked if he feels thirsty or mouth feels dry, he replied Yes.On 01/07/26 and 01/08/26 observation was done with R5 at bedside. No water container observed at bedside.On 01/08/26 at 02:51 PM, an interview was conducted with Nurse Supervisor NS (266). When asked if R5 was on any fluid restriction, she replied No he is not. And when NS266 was asked if resident should have water pitcher at bedside, she stated yes, let me ask one of my staff to give him a water pitcher. NS266 also explained that R5 is at risk for dehydration.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided to one of three residents in the sample. The facility failed to monitor and assess pain level with (Resident (R) 56) every shift. This deficient practice may put R56 at high risk for having pain that may affect function, impair mobility, impair mood, or disturb sleep, and diminish quality of life. Findings Include:R56 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE], with an initial admission date on 05/25/21. R56 diagnoses included, but not limited to, Parkinson's disease with dyskinesia, with fluctuations; Vitamin D deficiency; hyperlipidemia, unspecified, hypocalcemia; unspecified right bundle branch block; essential tremor; gout, unspecified; bilateral primary osteoarthritis of hip; bilateral osteoarthritis of knee; abnormal posture; and pain, unspecified. Review of the physician's order includes Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Oral Tablet 5-325 milligrams (mg) to be given by mouth three times a day related to pain, hold to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to discard expired medications and intravenous solution stored in three of five medication rooms observed. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications and receive intravenous solutions.Findings Include:1) On 01/08/26 at 07:15 AM, the Ilima unit medication room was inspected. In the medication refrigerator, a clear plastic storage bag containing medication vials for Resident (R) 89 was checked. The medication label on the storage bag documented four vials of Lorazepam 2 milligram/milliliter (mg/ml) received on 06/10/25. The storage bag contained three vials (which matched the narcotic log sheet in place for this ordered and current medication), two of the three vials had an expired date of 10/2025 printed on the label. The two vials were shown to Registered Nurse (RN) 266, who confirmed that they were expired and should have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate protective and preventive measure for infections as evidenced by the failure to label and store nebulizer equipment for one of two residents (Resident (R) 78) reviewed for infection prevention related to respiratory. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility put the resident at increased risk for infections.Findings Include:On 01/06/26 at 11:04 AM, observed R78's undated and uncovered nebulizer mask with medication chamber and tubing connected to the nebulizer machine placed on R78's nightstand.On 01/07/26 at 07:52 AM, observed R78's uncovered mask with medication chamber and tubing connected to the nebulizer machine and wedged between the nebulizer machine and box of personal belongings on R78's nightstand.On 01/08/26 at 08:29 AM, observed R78's uncovered nebulizer mask with medication chamber and tubing connected to the nebulizer machine with the tubing and mask placed over the nebulizer machine.On 01/09/26 at 08:30 AM, a review of the physician orders for R78 noted a current…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 43 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and review of policy, the facility failed to treat one Anonymous Resident (ARes1) and Resident (R)499 of six residents sampled, with respect and dignity. As a result of this deficiency ARes1 was not promoted the right to the maintenance of enhancement of their quality of life. The facility also left R499 in her soiled diaper for more than 40 minutes, putting R499 at risk for urinary tract infection (UTI) and perineum skin breakdown. Findings include: 1) During Resident interview on 04/10/25 at 03:00 PM, ARes1 relayed the following concerns: 1. Staff took a long time (sometimes up to forty minutes) to answer the call light. Staff would consistently say that they're not assigned to that room and pass the room without helping. ARes1 felt ignored because of this. 2. Staff did not maintain resident privacy after receiving a bath. ARes1 said the privacy curtains would be left wide open and felt exposed without wearing any clothing. 3. Staff did not wash hands before feeding. ARes1 said staff would have to be reminded to wash their hands before feeding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff members, the facility failed to implemented residents' care plans to eliminate risk of an accident related to wandering and elopement and monitor the effectiveness of interventions as necessary for 3 of 4 (Residents 1, 2, and 3) residents sampled. 1) Resident (R)1 had an actual elopement, the facility failed to revise the resident's care plan to develop person centered interventions, direct care staff were unaware of approaches/interventions to employ for R1's wandering behavior and the wandering and exit seeking behaviors were not accurately monitored resulting in no baseline data to determine the efficacy of the interventions. 2) The facility failed to develop a care plan to prevent elopement for R2 with wandering behaviors prior to the start of the survey. The facility also did not implement or accurately document care plan approaches for monitoring the function of WanderGuard once a day and the targeted behaviors (wandering and refusal of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with staff members, the facility did not execute a resident's right to reside in a clean home environment. Findings include: On 01/13/25 at 02:11 PM, observed Resident (R)1 in a wheelchair, self-propelling on her unit. At 02:17 PM, observed R1 enter room [ROOM NUMBER]. R1 transferred herself from the wheelchair onto Bed A and laid down. At 02:30 PM observed staff members enter room [ROOM NUMBER], stood by the foot of Bed A, then exit the room. At 02:35 AM, observed Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)1 enter room [ROOM NUMBER], close the privacy curtain and assisted R1 back to the wheelchair. CNA1 wheeled R1 back to her room. Observed room [ROOM NUMBER] with signage for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - set of infection control practices that involve wearing gowns and gloves during high-contact care for residents at risk of infection, i.e. indwelling medical devices, wounds). CNA2 reported the reason for EBP is R6 receives dialysis treatment. Observation from 02:40 PM to 02:50 PM, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interview with staff members, the facility failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 (Resident 2) of 4 residents reviewed for wandering/elopement behavior. This deficient practice has the potential to place resident at risk for accidents (i.e., falls, resident to resident altercations) and affect the resident's ability to achieve and maintain her highest medical, mental, and psychosocial needs and to cause adverse effects related to falls and resident to resident altercations. Findings include: Cross Reference to F689. Resident (R)2 has been identified for being at risk for elopement with a history of wandering behavior. The facility failed to conduct annual and quarterly elopement risk assessments, and implement care plan for wandering behavior. On 01/13/25 from 12:00 PM to 01:00 PM intermittent observations found R2 wandering on her unit, sometimes stopping to talk to other residents and at times would follow staff around the unit. A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, and interviews with staff members, the facility did not ensure a person-centered comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised following an actual incident of elopement for 1 (Resident 1) of 4 residents in the sample. Findings include: Cross Reference to F689. Resident (R)1 had an actual elopement on 12/06/24 and wandering behavior that places R1 at risk for falls, resident to resident altercations, and elopement. Review of R1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/21/24 notes R1 yielded a score of 3 (severe cognitive impairment) when the Brief Interview for Mental Status was administered. R1 was also coded for wandering, occurring one to three days during the observation period. R1 requires supervision or touching assistance for walking 10 feet, walking 50 feet with two turns, and walking 150 feet. A review of R1's progress notes from 11/29/24 to 01/12/25 found entries of R1 wandering into other residents' rooms: 11/29/24 at 02:41 PM, R1 wandered into another resident's room at night; 12/08/24, R1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review, narcotic count sheet review and policy review the facility failed to: 1) Label open on dates for five of six blood glucose test strips stored in two medication carts, have a nurse sign the narcotic count sheet when the count was done, store unopened insulin in a refrigerator per manufacture instructions and discard expired medication by the discard by date, 2) Ensure all medications used in the facility were stored in accordance with manufacturer recommendations in 3 of 16 medication carts and 3) Discard an expired medication stored on the storage cart. The deficient practice could affect residents having their blood glucose tested if the strip is expired, affect a resident receiving narcotic pain medication if the count has to be reconciled, affect a resident who is ordered insulin but cannot receive what is on hand due to it being stored incorrectly, affect a resident receiving an expired medication. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to be informed in advance, of the risk and benefits of the use of a psychotropic medication, and consent to treatment for two of five (Resident (R)134 and R141) sampled. R134's Resident Representative (RR)4 was not aware that the resident was receiving duplicate antidepressant therapy. RR4 confirmed the risk/benefits, education was not provided to RR4 regarding duplicate antidepressant therapy and did not sign a consent form. Requested a consent form from the facility and the facility confirmed a consent form was not obtained from RR4. As a result of this deficient practice, residents are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: 1) On 10/16/24 at 10:13 AM, conducted an interview with R134's Resident Representative (RR)4. During the interview, inquired about the three large bandages on R134's head. RR4 reported R134 frequently scratching and picking at his skin, on his head. Asked RR4 what interventions are the facility implementing for R134's scratching/picking behavior. RR4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) R67 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R67 has a medical history that includes, but not limited to, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, acquired absence of eye, and anxiety disorder. R67 had an annual assessment on 08/14/2024. During the assessment R67 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which means R67 is cognitively intact. Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 10/15/24 at 10:27 AM in R67's room. R67 was laying in bed. R67's call light was laying on a chair that was against a wall. R67 was not able to reach her call button. R67 asked State Agency (SA) if he/she can hand her the call light. R67 stated that she can call for help, but frequently the call light is not nearby for her to use. Observation was conducted on 10/17/24 at 09:08 AM in R67's room. R67 was laying in bed and asked SA if he/she has seen her call light. SA observed R67's call light laying on the floor. Interview was conducted with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a person-centered Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) for one resident in the sample (Resident 98). Despite identifying Resident (R)98 as an accident/safety hazards risk due to his smoking and behaviors, and after multiple documented incidents related to his smoking and behaviors surrounding his smoking, R98's smoking CP was not implemented consistently. As a result of this deficient practice, R98 was placed at risk for additional altercations related to his behaviors surrounding smoking. Findings include: On 04/05/24 the state agency (SA) received a facility-reported incident (FRI) ACTS #10878, describing a physical altercation between Resident (R)98 and R448 related to both residents smoking behaviors. An investigation into the FRI during the recertification survey conducted on 10/15/24 - 10/18/24 found deficient practices related to the incident. On 10/15/24 at 03:15 PM, observed R98 sitting in the designated smoking area alone with no staff present. On 10/16/24 at 10:01 AM, observation was done of R98…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to revise the care plan for one Resident (R)32 to provide the support needed when he leaned over in his wheelchair. Findings include: Cross reference to F684. R32 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Primary diagnosis includes Parkinson's disease and unspecified dementia per review of the facesheet. Random observations on the East dining/ activity area on the following dates, 10/15/24 at 09:16 AM; 10/16/24 at 10:30 AM; 10/16/24 at 2:19 PM; 10/17/24 at 10:14 AM; and 10/17/24 at 2:04 PM. Observed R32 sitting in a high back wheelchair, his neck bent to the right side leaning over and sleeping. Care plan reviewed. Approach start date 09/19/2024. I have a tendency to lean over in my wheelchair (WC) or have my head to the side sleeping in my WC. Assist me to upright position and use my cushion to support as I allow .

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide one resident with support of the head and neck while sitting in his wheelchair. The resident sleeping in his wheelchair slumped over to the right side throughout the day. The deficient practice affected one resident in the sample's quality of care. Findings include: Cross reference to F657 R32 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Primary diagnosis includes Parkinson's disease and unspecified dementia. Random observations on the East dining/ activity area on the following dates, 10/15/24 at 09:16 AM; 10/16/24 at 10:30 AM; 10/16/24 at 2:19 PM; 10/17/24 at 10:14 AM; and 10/17/24 at 2:04 PM. Observed R32 sitting in a high back wheelchair, his neck bent to the right side leaning over and sleeping. Interview with Licensed Nurse (LN) 35 on 10/18/24 at 11:35 AM to discuss the care plan for R32. LN35 stated that we don't have care planned interventions for support when he leans over in his chair, but he has a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is incontinent of bladder receives appropriate treatment to prevent urinary tract infections. R180's catheter tubing was observed to have sediment and blackish growth on the sediment throughout the entire length of the tubing. Review of R180's Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not contain an order for treatment of sediment and blackish growth in the catheter tubing. As a result of this deficient practice, residents with catheters are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: On 10/15/24 at 01:20 PM, conducted an observation and interview with R180 in the resident's room. While conducting the interview, observed R180's catheter tubing with copious amount of sediment and blackish growth throughout the catheter tubing. Resident stated the last time his catheter was changed was 3 weeks ago and prior to that, he had the same catheter and tubing for 3 months. Inquired if staff said anything to the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a thorough process to assure accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled medications, for 1 of 16 medication carts, in order to promptly identify loss or potential diversion. Findings include: On 10/17/24 at 08:55 AM, an inspection of the North Team 2 medication cart was done with Registered Nurse (RN)3. During a review of the Narcotic Signature Sheet, noted that the oncoming day shift nurse, RN3, had not signed or initialed it yet to attest and verify that the narcotic count was correct. RN3 confirmed that the narcotic count is done at the start of every shift, completed by both the off-going and on-coming nurse, and signed by both. RN3 verified that the off-going nurse had signed it, but she had not. At first, RN3 stated that she usually sign it before the end of my shift. After further questioning however, RN3 confirmed that she should have signed it as soon as the count was done, and agreed that with only one initial, it makes it appear as if the off-going nurse did the count by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to manage and monitor the medication regimen for one Resident of five in the sample by implementing a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for use of an antipsychotic or provide the clinical rationale from the physician that it was not recommended. The deficient practice failed to promote the residents highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Resident (R) 32 is an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Primary diagnosis includes Parkinson's disease and unspecified dementia per record review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS). Random observations of R32 on the East dining/ activity area on the following dates, 10/15/24 at 09:16 AM; 10/16/24 at 10:30 AM; 10/16/24 at 2:19 PM; 10/17/24 at 10:14 AM; and 10/17/24 at 2:04 PM. Observed R32 sitting in his wheelchair at the table sleeping or sitting quietly. No aggressive behavior observed. Record review dated 09/18/24. R32 takes the following…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store cutting boards and resident plate lids on racks that did not have rust colored debris. This deficient practice could affect all residents who are provided meals from the kitchen, putting them at risk for foodborne illness. Findings Include: On 10/15/24 at 10:04 AM during initial tour of kitchen, a concurrent interview and observation was done. Observation of one rack that had cutting boards stored also had rust colored debris. The Acting Nutritious Services Director stated she would move the (cutting boards) to a different area. On 10/17/24 at 10:50 AM while in the kitchen, to observe the tray line, noticed a rack with rust colored debris that stored the lids for the residents plates. Acting Nutritious Services Director confirmed the rust colored debris and stated she is in the process of replacing both racks.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning procedures for shared equipment were followed by a staff member. This deficient practice promotes the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections and has the potential to affect the residents in one of the facility units. Findings include: Observation was conducted on 10/18/24 at 09:30 AM. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 2 was seen rolling a vital signs machine into one of the rooms. LPN2 was not observed cleaning the blood pressure cuff with wipes prior to using it on Resident (R) 143. Once LPN2 was done taking R143's blood pressure and other vital signs, LPN2 rolled the vital signs machine towards R181's bed. LPN2 was observed taking R181's blood pressure. LPN2 did not clean the blood pressure cuff in between the two residents. LPN2 then placed the vital signs machine in the hallway. LPN2 did not wipe down the machine and/or attachments prior to parking it in the hallway. Interview was conducted with LPN2 on 10/18/24 at 09:46 AM. LPN2 stated that she should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to secure a storage room containing Germicidal Bleach Wipes, Surface Disinfectant Wipes and Hand Sanitizing Wipes. As a result of this deficiency, the facility put the safety and well-being of the residents at risk for accident hazards. Findings include: On 10/16/24 at 02:00 PM, the Storage Room near the Ilima Nurse Station was not secured and no staff was in the immediate vicinity to stop anyone from entering the room. A keypad lock was installed on the door, but the door could be opened by just pulling it. The room contained several containers of Germicidal Bleach Wipes, Surface Disinfectant Wipes and Hand Sanitizing Wipes. Staff interview on 10/16/24 at 02:25 PM, Director of Nursing was queried about the previous observation and acknowledged that the Storage Room should have been secured to prevent any unauthorized entry and accident hazards.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the right of Resident (R)3 to receive visitors of her choosing at the time of her choosing, for both visits and telephone calls. As a result of this deficient practice, R3 was denied the opportunity to speak with her son when he called on the phone and denied the choice of receiving visits from her husband. This placed R3 at risk for a decline in her quality of life and prevented her from attaining her highest practicable well-being. The facility corrected the deficient practice prior to the abbreviated survey to investigate a complaint filed on her behalf. Findings include: On 07/29/2024, the State Agency (SA) received a complaint forwarded from the Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and a complaint from the attorney of Resident (R)3's family member (FM)1, both detailing how the facility had denied visits/access to R3 from all family members except for her power-of-attorney (POA), as well as the LTCO. On 08/05/24, the state agency received an e-mailed complaint from FM1 detailing several concerns about her care. Among…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, document and record review (RR), the facility failed to ensure that two Resident's (R)1 and R2 of a sample of four had their comprehensive care plans (CP) reviewed and revised in a timely manner to include high risk behaviors that needed to be closely monitored. R1 had exit seeking behavior, which was not added to the CP in a timely manner, and R2 was not swallowing his medications at the time of administration, which was not added to the CP. As a result of this deficient practice, there was increased risk the behavior would reoccur and may result in a negative outcome. This deficient practice has a potential to affect all residents. Findings include: 1) R1 is [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] after being hospitalized for delirium tremors, alcohol withdrawal, chronic alcoholism and lactic acidosis (build-up of lactic acid in bloodstream). He lived alone and completely independent prior to his admission. His medical history includes severe alcohol use disorder. alcoholic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the activities of daily living, including personal hygiene for one of three residents sampled. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident (R)3 was hindered from attaining her highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility. Findings include: Resident (R)3 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Her diagnoses include, but are not limited to, a history of cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic kidney disease, diabetes with diabetic peripheral angiopathy without gangrene (changes in blood vessels that contribute to the formation of plaques in the arteries of the limbs, particularly the feet and legs), and other nail disorders. On 08/05/2024, the state agency received an e-mailed complaint from R3's family member (FM)1 detailing how when he had visited R3 from July 24 to July 28,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate diabetic foot care for Resident (R)3. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility placed R3 at risk for avoidable injuries. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in need of diabetic foot care. Findings include: Resident (R)3 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Her diagnoses include, but are not limited to, a history of cerebral infarction (stroke), chronic kidney disease, diabetes with diabetic peripheral angiopathy without gangrene (changes in blood vessels that contribute to the formation of plaques in the arteries of the limbs, particularly the feet and legs), and other nail disorders. On 08/05/2024, the state agency received an e-mailed complaint from R3's family member (FM)1 detailing how when he had visited R3 from July 24, 2024 to July 28, 2024 he had made several observations that were concerning to him regarding her care. Among…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review (RR) and interviews, the facility failed to provide incontinence care, in accordance with professional standards of practice and individual care plans (CP) for two resident's (R)1 and R2, of a sample size of seven. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents were at increased risk of adverse outcomes related to incontinence that included comfort, skin breakdown and infection. This could affect their ability to meet their highest potential of physical and mental well-being. The deficient practice had been corrected prior to the survey, and met the criteria for past noncompliance. Findings include: 1) The Office of Healthcare Assurance (OHCA) received a completed facility incident report on 02/29/2024 regarding incontinence care. On the evening of 02/24/2024, a CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant)1 reported two residents (R1 and R2) were allegedly not provided incontinent care by CNA2, scheduled on the day shift. R1 is a [AGE] year old female admitted to facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0574 — pattern
    The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, the facility failed to ensure residents were furnished with the information for contacting the State Survey Agency to file a complaint. This deficient practice has the potential to impede a resident(s) ability to exercise their right to file a complaint. Findings include: On 10/12/23 at 09:20 AM an interview was conducted with resident council representatives. The representatives were asked if they have been informed of their right (and provided information on how) to formally complain to the State Survey Agency (SA) about the care they are receiving. The representatives were not aware they could submit a complaint to the SA. Also, the representatives were not aware of whether this information is posted.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to uphold a resident's right to privacy of one resident (R), R367, out of two residents in the sample. A certified nursing assistant (CNA) did not provide the necessary privacy of R367 during his shower. This deficient practice violates the resident's right to privacy and could potentially cause psychosocial harm to the resident. Findings include: On 10/11/23 at 08:26 AM, observations were made on one nursing unit. In R367's room, observed a CNA bathing a resident in the shower. The door to the bathroom was opened, the curtain in the room to cover the large window pane was open, and the room door to the hallway was opened. The resident was naked sitting on a shower chair and the whole left side of his body was able to be visualized from the hallway. Record review of the West Neighborhood Roster updated on 10/08/23 showed that R367 was the sole occupant of that room where the observation of a CNA showering a resident in the bathroom occurred. On 10/12/23 at 09:20 AM, conducted an interview with Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable, homelike environment for residents at the facility, as evidenced by hot, uncomfortable temperatures in the resident rooms, especially when the room door was closed for personal care, poor pest control, dusty electric fans that were widely used throughout the facility, and walls in resident room(s) in need of repair. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents unnecessarily experienced an uncomfortable environment that was not homelike, with the potential to cause psychosocial harm. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)165 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, persistent vegetative state, hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) affecting both sides of the body, and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) During an interview with Resident (R)154 on October 10, 2023, they expressed an increase in their anxiety recently, due to the recent Lahaina Fire. The spouse escaped the Lahaina fire with car, family dog and themselves only. The home and all its contents was lost in the fire. Although R154 was not physically present when this occurred, she was traumatized by the news of how her immediate family had escaped, and the loss of the family home and belongings including important documents. Record review of R154's Electronic Heath Record (EHR), and interview with Neighborhood Supervisor (NS)3 and Social Services Assistant (SSA)3 confirmed there was no psychosocial assessment or comprehensive care plan completed for R154 after this traumatic event for trauma informed care. The facility failed to assess, develop, and implement a comprehensive care plan for trauma informed care for R154 following this traumatic event to provide psychological support, services, and treatment. 3) R212 tested positive for COVID on July…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to review and revise the Resident's Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) for 3 of 36 residents (R) in the sample (Residents 149, 75, and 147), to effectively address their status, condition, and needs. As a result of this deficient practice, staff did not have the information necessary to adequately care for these residents so that they could meet their highest potential of physical and psychosocial well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)149 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses include, but are not limited to, unspecified trochanteric fracture of left femur (fracture of upper left thigh bone/hip), Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and anxiety disorder. On 09/26/23, the State Agency (SA) received a facility-reported incident (FRI) through e-mail. The FRI (ACTS #10564) detailed an incident where R186 reached out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to: 1) Implement 2 (Residents 147 and 263) of 3 residents' bowel protocol. The facility failed to accurately document 147's bowel activity resulting in unnecessary invasive treatment (suppository and two enemas). This deficient practice has the potential to result in residents experiencing discomfort, fecal impaction, or receiving unnecessary treatment. 2) Assure a root cause analysis for 1 (Resident 75) of 5 residents investigated for skin conditions was done. The facility did not identify contributing factors of skin breakdown. This deficient practice has the potential to result in further skin breakdowns, lack of healing of existing wounds, and/or further wound infections. 3) Inform Resident (R)463 of a schedule change for an appointment with the cardiologist. In addition, the facility did not assure R463's medications were available, to avoid missing doses. This deficient practice has the potential to result in the resident not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the facility's infection prevention and control measures. Facility did not ensure that staff were wearing applicable personal protective equipment (PPE) when providing care to residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and while handling potentially contaminated items, performed hand hygiene after removing gloves, and maintained shower chairs in sanitary and good repair. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for the potential spread of infections and communicable diseases. Findings include: 1) On 10/10/23 at 10:42 AM, observed Registered Nurse (RN)15 wearing a gown, gloves and face mask while providing care to a resident in room [ROOM NUMBER]. RN15 said she was giving medications through the gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach) and a gown was required because the resident is on enhanced barrier precautions. There was a sign by the door that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, the facility failed to assure residents of the facility were treated with respect and dignity and provided care in an environment that enhances their quality of life. This deficient practice has the potential to result in residents not attaining or maintaining their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: On 10/12/23 at 09:20 AM an interview was conducted with resident council representatives in the Gardenia neighborhood. A resident reported sometimes the facility is short-handed and staff must work doubles. The resident further shared that she/he feels for the staff and most of them are very nice but sometimes they have an attitude, maybe they had a bad day. A resident also reported that staff will call female residents mama or grandma and expressed concern for females who are single and don't have children or grandchildren. The resident also shared, maybe these residents may not want to be called mama or grandma. A resident reported experiences of activating the call light, staff respond and turn off the call light. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of 1 of 2 residents (R) sampled by not ensuring that her call light was always placed within her reach, or positioned so that she could activate it. As a result of this deficient practice, R65 was placed at risk of not having her emergent needs met in a timely manner and was prevented from achieving independent functioning with regards to calling for help. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility who can activate a call light. Findings include: Resident (R)65 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R65's current diagnoses include but are not limited to osteoarthritis (a degenerative joint disease in which the tissues in the joint break down over time) of both hands, chronic pain, functional quadriplegia (complete immobility due to severe disability or frailty from another medical condition without injury to the brain or spinal cord), and dementia. On 10/10/23 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and ensure the resident's right to make choices about aspects of his life that are significant to him was supported for 1 of 6 residents (Resident (R) 110) in the sample. The facility did not identify and accommodate R110's choice to smoke more than twice daily. As a result of this deficient practice, the resident was at risk of potential negative psychosocial outcomes. Findings include: On 10/10/23 at 11:24 AM, initial interview with R110 conducted in his room. R110 said he is a smoker and was only allowed to smoke twice a day. R110 also said that he has terminal cancer and would like to smoke at least four times a day. When asked if he had brought this up with the staff, he responded that he has but the staff do not listen to him. He feels that he does not have a choice and can only go out to smoke when the staff are able to take him. On 10/11/23 at 10:44 AM, observed R110 up in a non-motorized wheelchair being pushed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of the 36 residents (Resident (R) 8) in the sample was free from physical restraints imposed for the purpose of convenience and not required to treat the resident's medical symptoms. R8 had her bed positioned against the wall and a pillow was placed under the fitted bed sheet. As a result of this deficient practice, R8 was not able to get out of bed on her own. Findings include: On 10/10/23 at 10:26 AM, observed R8 lying in bed with a pillow on her left side placed under the fitted bed sheets. Her bed was also positioned against the wall on her right ride. At 01:33 PM, R8 was observed in bed with left arm leaning on the pillow on her left side that was still under the bed sheet. Asked R8 if she needed to get out of bed but she did not verbally respond. On 10/11/23 at 08:04 AM, observed R8 lying in bed with eyes closed. A pillow was placed under the fitted bed sheet on her left side. On 10/12/23 at 09:27 AM, observed R8 lying in bed with eyes closed. A pillow was placed under the fitted bed sheet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide written notice of transfer or discharge for one of three residents (Resident (R) 14) sampled for hospitalization, and failed to send a notice of discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO). Findings include: R14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 10/11/23 at 11:07 AM, a review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R14 revealed that she was transferred and admitted to a local acute care hospital on [DATE] for pneumonia, and on 09/10/23 for a leaking gastrostomy tube (a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). A document titled, Notice of Resident Discharge/Transfer and Bed Hold Policy dated 09/13/23 was scanned into the EHR. The document noted that R14's family and the LTCO were notified of the discharge to the hospital on [DATE]. However, no document was found for R14's hospitalization on 07/07/23. On 10/18/23 at 09:27 AM, a concurrent interview and record review was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 residents (Resident 2 and Resident 165) sampled received the appropriate treatment, equipment, and services to increase or prevent further decrease in range of motion (ROM). As a result of this deficient practice, both residents have been placed at risk of worsening contractures and hindered from reaching their highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility with ROM deficits. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)165 is a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, persistent vegetative state, hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) affecting both sides of the body, and aphasia (loss of ability to understand or express speech, caused by brain damage). In addition, R165 has a gastrostomy tube (an opening into the stomach from the abdominal wall, made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2) R134 had an indwelling urinary catheter. It was observed by this writer that on October 10, 11, 12, 17 and 18, 2023, the catheter bag had a privacy cover over it, and was attached to the side of the bed. However, on each observed occasion, the bag with the privacy cover was sitting on the floor, allowing easy access for any bugs or insects crawling on the floor to enter into the privacy cover, providing a risk of contamination that may lead to a urinary track infection for R134. The facility failed to ensure safe and adequate catheter care was being conducted. Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 2 residents (Resident (R) 179 and R134) sampled for indwelling urinary catheters received the appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections. This deficient practice has the potential to expose both residents to contaminants that may cause preventable urinary tract infections. Findings include: 1) On 10/12/23 at 04:00 PM, observed Registered Nurse (RN)25 and a nursing student in R179's room without wearing a gown. R179 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview with staff members, the facility failed to assure resident's enteral formula was labeled with resident's name, date and time of preparation, rate of feeding and the resident's room number on the label for 1 (Resident 75) of 1 resident sampled. This deficient practice has the potential to result in administration to the wrong resident, over/underfeeding, or using expired formula. Findings include: Resident (R)75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage affecting right dominant side; other paralytic syndrome following non traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage; quadriplegia (form of paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus the torso), unspecified; aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate); and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing foods or liquids). On 10/11/23 at 08:06 AM observed R75 lying in bed. There was a bag of Diabetisource formula…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 6 residents (R) sampled for respiratory services (Residents 2 and 165) received care consistent with professional standards of practice or facility protocol. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents' safety was compromised, and they were placed at an increased risk of avoidable injuries and/or adverse outcomes in the event of a respiratory emergency. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents at the facility with a tracheostomy (an opening surgically created through the neck into the trachea (windpipe) to allow direct access to the breathing tube and is commonly done in an operating room under general anesthesia. A tube is usually placed through this opening to provide an airway and to remove secretions from the lungs). Findings include: 1) R2 is an [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her current diagnoses include, but are not limited to, primary lateral sclerosis (a neuromuscular…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to identify a recent trauma and any triggers that may further traumatize the resident for one of the residents in the sample. Findings include: During an interview with Resident #154 (R154) on the afternoon of October 10, 2023, they expressed feelings of increased anxiety. The resident's spouse was present and informed surveyor of her escape from the recent Lahaina fire, escaping with only themselves, the family pet dog and the car. The house and all belongings were lost in the fire. Although the resident was not physically present during the fire, the news of the fire and its direct impact on her spouse, their family home, and family pet dog was traumatizing for her to learn about, and increased her level of anxiety that she already suffered with. A document of a Trauma-Informed Care Observation dated 08/15/2023 provided by the facility post-survey, asked the question Have you ever experienced, witnessed, learned about a natural disaster (e.g. flood, tornado, hurricane, earthquake etc.)? R154…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview with staff member, the facility failed to competently provide nursing services for administration of medication as evidenced by the nursing staff not following standard procedure and best practice for administering medications. In addition, the nurse administered the medications approximately 2 hours after the scheduled time, as per the provider orders. Findings include: On 10/12/23 at 10:14 AM observed Resident (R)140 seated at a table in the breezeway with another resident, R54, with no visible staff around. R140 was ingesting a pudding-like substance from a small plastic cup. Inquired if she was taking her medicine, R54 nodded her head yes. Neighborhood Supervisor (NS)2 was called over and a concurrent observation was done. NS2 confirmed the small plastic cup contained R140's crushed medication mixed in pudding. Inquired whether R140 was assessed to self-administer her medication. NS2 responded R140 receives crushed medication and can scoop and ingest her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all medications used in the facility were labeled in accordance with professional standards, including accurate expiration dates. Proper labeling of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. In addition, the facility failed to clearly label a multidose vial (MDV, medication vial that is accessed multiple times to deliver doses to different residents) in one medication room out of three rooms sampled. The opening date of a multidose vial (MDV) of tuberculin (TB) purified protein derivative (PPD) was not clearly written on the vial. This medication is injected under the skin of residents to check for the presence of tuberculosis (disease where a specified type of bacteria infects the lungs and/or other organs). This deficient practice could potentially cause an infection in residents receiving a medication that is accessed multiple times from the MDV. These…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review the facility failed to maintain medical records on one resident (Resident 186) that were accurately documented, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: On 10/12/23 at 09:18 AM, during a review of Resident (R)186's comprehensive care plan, it was noted that no revisions were made to his Behavioral Symptoms care plan following an incident on 09/26/23 where he spontaneously grabbed R149 by the forearm and left a bruise. On 10/12/23 at 09:30 AM, requested a printed copy of R186's comprehensive care plan from the Administrator. At 11:18 AM, the care plan was received from the Administrative Assistant (AA). Under the care plan for Behavioral Symptoms was the following intervention documented with a start date of 09/29/23: I have a tendency to grab someone if you are close to me, and I do not realize my own strength. Try to keep other residents at a safe distance from me. At 11:31 AM, a review of a Care Plan History Report revealed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal vaccination was offered to one of the five residents (Resident (R) 179) in the sample. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk for acquiring, transmitting, and developing possible complications from pneumococcal disease. Findings include: On 10/17/23 at 03:30 PM, review of R179's Electronic Health Record (EHR) conducted. R179 is an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long-term care. Review of vaccination records revealed that R179 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine. On 10/18/23 at 09:53 AM, concurrent interview and record review conducted with Registered Nurse (RN)15 in the nurses' station. RN15 confirmed that R179 did not receive the pneumococcal vaccine after checking the EHR. RN15 also said that there was an order to offer the vaccine but does not know if the vaccine was offered since there was no signed consent or declination form in the EHR. RN15 said she will follow up with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$170,249 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $71,019 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
  • $55,640 — penalty dated 2024-08-12
  • $43,590 — penalty dated 2023-10-19

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHUN, GRANTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2017
DORHEIM, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/17/2025
KISHABA, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
LO, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
MCBARNET, ALEXANDERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2015
MUNEKIYO, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2015
NISHITA, JOSIAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2020
ROMSON, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
SAKAMOTO, ROYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2015
WACHI, EILEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2017
OHANA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
LORE, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
MCCLENNON, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MORIKUNI, SUANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
SANTOS, RODRIGOIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/14/2025
COUNTY OF MAUI-DEPARTMENT OF FINANCEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1995
SMITH, TOBYIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$47.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 59%Medicare 7%Other / private 34%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$619per resident / day
operating cost
$18,809per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$556per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125007. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next