Aloha Nursing & Rehab Centre
45-545 Kamehameha Highway, Kaneohe, HI 96744 · For profit - Partnership · 141 certified beds · (808) 247-2220 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (40) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $36,296 in federal fines (most recent 2023-08-24)
- its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 17.0% | 16.8% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.3% | 4.9% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.6% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.6% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 1.2% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.4% | 1.9% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.2% | 20.4% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.1% | 9.1% | 18.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 95.4% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.2% | 3.4% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 17.2% | 17.6% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.0% | 11.9% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 77.2% | 84.7% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.7% | 19.4% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 17.6% | 10.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.64 | 1.09 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 0.88 | 1.80 | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
66.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 258 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 105 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 31% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 66.6%CMS range 61.6–71.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.8%CMS range 7.4–13.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 47.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 11.9% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.3–10.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.11 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 141 beds and averages 102.0 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.28 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.95 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 2.02 to 1.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
40 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 29 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the nursing staff failed to demonstrate competency when caring for two residents (R1 and R2) out of a sample size of three. Evidence included: 1. R1 had a change of condition that the Registered Nurse (RN)1 failed to immediately notify the physician (MD1). 2. When MD1 failed to respond, there were no other attempts to contact him or another provider. 3. RN1 failed to monitor R1's condition according to nursing standards. 4. The nursing staff failed to attempt to wean R2 off oxygen as directed by MD order, and 5. MD was not notified R2 refused to wean off oxygen therapy. As a result of these deficiencies, R1 suffered harm when she fell a second time and became unresponsive requiring transfer to the hospital. In addition, R2 was at increased risk of complications due to the oxygen administration. If nursing staff do not have the skill set and competency to assess, evaluate and respond to resident's needs, the residents are at increased risk of harm or death. Findings include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based observation, interviews and review of the facility's Food Management System policies, the facility failed to monitor and check the dishwasher sanitizing temperature logs on a consistent basis, properly label open food items in the freezer, and discard food items in the refrigerator by its use-by date. This deficient practice places residents in the facility who are provided with meals, at risk for foodborne illness.Findings Include:1) On 07/29/25 at 08:00 AM, initial walkthrough of the kitchen with Kitchen Staff (KS) 1, noted dishwasher heat sanitizing log with missing temperature checks for the following dates and mealtimes for the month of July:07/08-07/29, missing dinner check07/11-07/20, missing breakfast check07/25-07/27, missing breakfast check07/27, miss lunch checkConcurrent interview with KS2 noted the missed documentation and she forgot to check temperature on some of those days. Both KS1 and KS2 confirmed that the dishwasher sanitizing temperature should be checked three times a day, every day when washing dirty dishes after each meal to ensure dishes and utensils…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and review of the facility's Feeding Impaired Resident's policy, the facility failed to promote care that maintains the dignity for one out of seven residents (Resident (R) 57) observed during dining observation. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who require assistance with their meals.Findings Include:On 07/29/25 at 12:30 PM, observed R57 in bed waiting for assistance with lunch. At 12:35 PM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 41 came into R57's room to assist R57 with lunch. Observed CNA41 assisting R57 with four to five spoonful of food and sips of juice while standing up. At 12:40 PM, observed CNA41 taking the lunch tray away. CNA41 did not take time to encourage resident to eat more and only spent five minutes assisting R57 with lunch.On 07/29/25 at 12:45 PM, interview with CNA41 stated the facility's policy for assisting impaired residents with their meals is to be sitting down. CNA41 stated sitting down while assisting the residents with their meals would make them feel more comfortable. CNA41 also verbalized that R57…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to discuss and complete the baseline care plan (BCP) within 48 hours for one out of one residents (Resident (R) 28) sampled for BCPs. This deficient practice places residents at risk for not receiving appropriate and timely care, delays the development of care to address resident's immediate health and safety needs, hinders continuity of care, and impedes communication amongst nursing staff. Findings Include:On 07/30/25 at 09:29 AM, interview with R28 noted that the facility did not include him in care plan decision making when he first was admitted . On 07/31/25 at 3:00 PM, record review of R28's Electronic Health Record (EHR) noted he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. No BCP found in the EHR and no documentation that BCP was discussed with R28 or Family Member (FM) within 48 hours of admission. On 8/01/25 at 08:45 AM, interview with Director of Nursing (DON) noted the facility will discuss the care plan conference summary and med orders with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents (Resident (R) 2), sampled for limited range of motion (ROM), received the appropriate treatment to prevent or delay a further decrease to the contracted lower extremities. This hindered R2's ability to maintain the highest practicable well-being. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility who have limited ROM.Findings Include:Resident (R) 2 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for long term care with a primary diagnosis of anoxic brain damage (brain loses oxygen supply causing permanent brain damage). A Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/02/25 noted R2 requires dependent care (resident does none of the effort to complete the activity) for his Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and for rolling left and right in bed. On 08/01/25 at 08:07 AM, a review of R2's care plan was conducted. The Focus section of R2's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement interventions to prevent avoidable falls for one of one (Resident (R)19) sampled. R19 had fall five fall incidents from 05/11, 06/01, 06/10, 06/17, and 07/17/25. One of the five fall incidents resulted with R19 sustaining an arm injury (abrasion or skin tear).Findings Include: On 07/29/25 at 09:16 AM, during a tour of the facility, observed R19's room was located farthest from the nurses' station and with door completely closed. After knocking and requesting permission to enter R19's room, seen him alone, sitting at the right side of the bed eating breakfast.Reviewed the facility matrix on 07/29/25 at 10:30 AM. Noted R19 with Alzheimer's/Dementia or a syndrome characterized by progressive decline in cognitive functions, such as memory, thinking, reasoning, language, and judgment, that interferes with daily life and independence, and a fall with injury. On 07/30/25 at 11:17 AM, Electronic Medical Record (EMR) review was done. Noted nursing staff implemented neuro-checks with R19 after a fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent dehydration for one (Resident (R) 21) of one resident in the sample, despite identifying them as at risk for compromised nutrition and hydration. This deficient practice could affect residents who rely on staff to provide fluids to them throughout the day to maintain proper hydration and health.Findings Include:On 07/29/25 at 09:15 AM, concurrent observation and interview was done. Observed no water pitcher found in R115's bedside. Subsequent observation was done at 10:35 AM and found no water pitcher was provided at resident's bedside. An interview was done at 11:00 AM with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA135) inside resident's room if R115 requires a water pitcher inside her room and she confirmed that resident is able to pour water from a pitcher and should have water pitcher at bedside.On 07/30/25, review of R115's Electronic Health Record (EHR) found her diagnoses included, but are not limited to, Cerebral infarction or death of brain tissue due to a lack of blood supply,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a protocol to identify past trauma experienced for two of two residents (Resident (R) 3 and R40) sampled for mood/behavior. As a result of this deficient practice, both residents did not have their trauma triggers identified, placing them at increased risk of re-traumatization, and was hindered from attaining their highest practicable mental and psychosocial well-being.Findings Include:1) R3 is a [AGE] year-old male readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include vascular dementia, with other behavioral disturbance and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/12/25 noted that R3's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 03, which indicated that R3 has severe cognitive impairment. On 07/30/25 at 08:45 AM, interviewed R3's Family Member (FM10). When asked about past trauma in R3's life, FM10 stated that R3 was in the Vietnam War and has a diagnosis of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications and equipment in two of three medication carts and wound care supplies for one resident (Resident (R) 9) were stored and labeled in accordance with professional standards. Proper storage and labeling of medications and equipment are necessary to promote safe administration practices and decrease the risk for medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility who take medications and utilize equipment stored in the medication and treatment carts. Findings Include: 1) On [DATE] at 09:44 AM, a medication cup containing a white cream and tongue depressor was observed at the bedside of Resident (R) 9. At 09:47 AM, interviewed Registered Nurse (RN) 75 inside R9's room. RN75 stated that the white cream was Flagyl powder that was mixed with the cream and applied to R9's coccyx wound by the evening shift nurse. RN75 confirmed that it should not have been left by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to assure one of one Resident ((R) 69) sampled for Hospice had a current certification of terminal illness and current Interdisciplinary Group (IDG) Comprehensive Assessment in her hospice binder or electronic health record (EHR). R69's EHR and hospice folder were not updated with current care information putting the resident at risk for not being provided continuity of care at the end of life. Findings Include:On 07/30/25 record review of R69's Electronic Health Record (EHR) and facility provided matrix revealed resident is receiving hospice services. Review of R69's hospice binder revealed it did not have a current hospice certification of terminal illness and the last IDG Comprehensive Assessment Details form from July 2025. On 07/30/25 at 03:45 PM inquired of Director of Nursing (DON) for current hospice certification of terminal illness and IDG Comprehensive Assessment Details form. DON reviewed R69's hospice binder and confirmed it was not in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the facility's infection prevention and control measures. After exiting a Transmission Based Precaution (TPB) room (a COVID positive resident), Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) 57 was not wearing applicable Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), Registered Nurse (RN) 127 did not perform glove change and any hand hygiene while performing wound care for resident (Resident (R) R104). The facility also failed to assure Resident (R) 67's urinary catheter bag was hanging and not on the ground while he was in bed. These deficient practices placed the resident at risk for developing preventable infections and other adverse health complications. Findings Include: 1) Record review of R67's Electronic Health Record (EHR) on 07/29/25 revealed he is a [AGE] year-old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/22/25 revealed his Brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 29 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record and document review, the facility failed to make timely revisions to the comprehensive person-centered care plan of four residents (R)1, R2, R3 and R4, of six residents sampled. Findings include: 1) R1 was a male admitted to the facility on [DATE] for pneumonia, due to Coronavirus. He required one person assist for all activities of daily living. On 09/09/2024, a family member (FM)1 made a complaint regarding nursing care, and specifically requested that R1's clothes be changed daily, and that he would be up for all meals. Review of the complaint/grievance form included the follow up .(Director of Nursing/DON) to f/u w/CNA's (follow up with Certified Nurse Assistants) about standard of care-specifically changing Res' (R1's) clothes daily. Res will be up for all meals. The document indicated the issue was resolved. Review of Nursing Progress notes dated 09/25/2024 at 10:57 AM revealed the following entry: .Requires 1x person mod (moderate) assist with ADL's and transfers.Requires 1:1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-05-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify and plan in advance for the situation where one Resident (R)4, of one sampled, would have a predictable condition decline, in which health care decision-making would be needed to provide guidance to the direct care staff. Specifically, when R4 had a significant change of condition, clinical interventions where implemented, the Power of Attorney (POA) was notified in a timely manner for direction, but staff failed to immediately consult with the physician about the condition change. As a result of the lack of planning, there may have been a delay in transfer to a higher level of care. Findings include: 1) R4 was a [AGE] year old male, who was a long term resident at the facility with a history of Parkinson's Disease, dementia, severe dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, hypertension, and congestive heart failure. On 03/03/2025, R4 was sent to the hospital due to shortness of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-03 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to be informed in advance of the risks and benefits of proposed care for two of three residents (R) (R4 and R11) sampled. The facility did not have documentation that the resident or resident representative was informed, in advance, of the risk and benefits of psychotropic medication therapy. As a result of this deficient practice, resident's receiving psychotropic medication are at risk for more than minimal harm. Findings include: 1) On 01/03/25 at 02:13 PM, conducted a review of R4's Electronic Health Record (EHR). Review of physician orders documented an order for scheduled Lexapro (ordered on 12/03/24) and Ativan as needed (PRN) (ordered 11/29/24). R4's EHR did not contain documentation for the use of Lexapro and Ativan and documentation of education regarding the risk versus benefit for both medications. On 01/03/25 at 03:40 PM, conducted a concurrent interview and record review of R4's EHR with the Director of Nursing (DON). DON navigated R4's EHR and confirmed the facility did not inform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and review of the policy, the facility failed to store food in a safe manner and maintain a sanitary cooking area. Two nourishment refrigerators on the first and second floors internal temperatures were not kept at or below 41 degrees. Perishable foods in the refrigerators were found to be at temperatures that were at 49.5 and 51 degrees. One pantry refrigerator in the main kitchen was found with an internal temperature at 43 degrees. Opened foods were not labeled with an indication of when staff should dispose of the food in the pantry, dry storage, and cooking areas. The deficient practice places residents in the facility at risk for foodborne illness. Findings include: Observation in the Kitchen on 08/06/24 at 08:40 AM in the pantry refrigerator, observed an open package of shredded [NAME] mozzarella cheese with no label or date. There was no internal thermometer found inside the unit. The external digital temperature reading was 48 degrees. The surveyor asked the kitchen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-08-09 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to include in the facility assessment the staffing resources required to meet the needs of their resident population. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the facility's resident's ability to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, functional mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: The facility assessment stated the facility is licensed for 141 beds with an average daily census of 95 residents based on the resident population profile from 06/05/23 to 06/04/24. Review of the facility assessment found documentation that describes the facility's resident population and acuity levels, however, there was no documentation of the staffing levels required to meet the residents' needs. On 08/09/24 at 10:04 AM, a concurrent interview and record review was conducted with the Administrator and the Director of Nursing (DON) in the education room. Asked Administrator and DON how staffing levels are determined. DON said it is based on the census and acuity. Asked if the required staffing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-09 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to formulate an Advanced Health Care Directive (AHCD) for three of six Residents [(R)151, R87, and R97] sampled. Findings include: R151 is an [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], after a hospitalization for metabolic encephalopathy (brain dysfunction caused by an underlying illness), and has full code status per his medical record face sheet. R151's Electronic Health Record (EHR) reviewed. No AHCD found. No supporting documentation about formulating or obtaining an AHCD was found in the progress notes or Care Plan (CP) dated 07/24/24. Copy of the AHCD and/or supporting documentation for R151 requested from the Administrator on 08/07/24 at 11:40 AM. Social services progress note dated 08/07/24 at 12:35 PM reviewed that documented the following: Previously inquired about AHCD? POLST and spouse said that they have a will which she believes includes that, requested she bring in a copy. Reminded spouse today…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to electronically transmit and complete the Minimum Data Set (MDS) data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) system within 14 days for one Resident [(R)87] sampled. Findings include: On 08/07/24 at 02:49 PM, conducted an interview and concurrent record review of R87's Electronic Health Record with the Minimum Data Set Coordinator (MDSC)1. Reviewing R87's Minimum Data Set (MDS) documented there was a late warning for the submission of the admissions MDS, R87 returned from the hospital on [DATE]. The MDS had not yet been submitted. MDSC1 confirmed R87's MDS was late and should have been submitted to the CMS system but was not. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator on 08/07/24 at 03:25 PM, requested the MDS 3.0 Final Validation Report. DON provided the MDS 3.0 Final Validation Report on 08/09/24 at 09:58 AM which documented R87's target date was 07/23/24 Assessment Completed Late: Z0500B (assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed and/or implemented for three residents (Resident (R)300, R250 and R52) in the sample. Specifically, a care plan was not developed to monitor for adverse effects of taking a blood thinner for R300. No care plan was developed for the care of R250's Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line (tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein above the heart to provide intravenous treatments), The facility did not develop a care plan to address R52's skin condition. As a result of these deficient practices, these residents were placed at risk for a decline in their quality of life, and were prevented from attaining their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. These deficient practices have the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) R250 is a [AGE] year-old resident, admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's comprehensive person-centered care plan was revised for one Resident (R)87 of 22 residents in the sample. Findings include: Review of R87's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented R87 was discharged to a hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. On 08/07/24 at 02:38 PM, inquired with Social Services Manager (SSM)8 if R87 had a care plan meeting since the resident returned from the hospital. SSM8 confirmed R87 has not had a care plan meeting since the resident returned from the hospital (07/17/24) and was not currently on the facility's calendar to have a care plan meeting. SSM8 reported when the Minimum Data Set (MDS) is submitted, it triggers facility to schedule a care plan meeting on their calendar. (Cross reference with F640: Encoding/transmitting/Resident Assessment) During a concurrent record review and interview with MSDC1, it was confirmed the facility had not yet submitted R87's MDS to the Centers for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one resident (R)150 of 22 in the sample, was free of accidents during her stay in the facility and failed to develop a discharge plan that would ensure the resident was safely discharged . R150 had multiple falls during her stay in the facility. The deficient practice increased the resident's risk for injury and has the potential to affect residents who are discharged home. Findings include: Aspen Complaint Tracking System (ACTS) intake #10993 dated 05/30/24 documented, R150 had several falls while in the facility and was discharged home from the facility on 05/25/24, without home supervision, and without family support due to an unsafe environment. Telephone call to R150's Family Member (FM) and Power of Attorney on 08/08/24 at 5:06 PM. FM stated the day before she was going to be discharged , R150 had a fall, and that she had at least four while in the facility. I worked with the Social Services Assistant (SSA)2 and told her that R150 isn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate services to prevent urinary tract infections for one resident (Resident (R) 52) sampled. The deficient practice exposed the resident to contaminants that may cause preventable urinary tract infections. This has the potential to affect all residents with a urinary catheter. Findings include: On 08/06/24 at 11:58 AM, observed R52 in a wheelchair being assisted out of the elevator on the second floor. R52 had a urinary catheter tubing connected to a collection bag placed in a privacy cover hung under the wheelchair seat. While R52 was being pushed from the elevator to the dining area table, the catheter tubing was dragging on the floor. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) for R52 revealed that he has a suprapubic catheter (tube inserted into the bladder through a cut in the abdomen to drain urine) and went out on 08/06/24 to see his doctor to have it changed. On 08/08/24 at 01:33 PM, an interview with the Infection Preventionist (IP) was conducted, IP confirmed that the urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff implemented specific competencies necessary for resident safety. This deficient practice has the potential for harm. Findings include: 1) Review of Resident (R)34's Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented on the most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 04/23/24, Section C. Cognitive Patterns, R34 scored a seven (7) on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating R34's cognition is severely impaired. On 08/06/24 at 10:29 AM, conducted an observation of R34 is the resident's room, seated in a wheelchair, with a bedside table in front of the wheelchair, with ten (10) medications tablets on the table, and no staff present in the room or in the line of sight of the resident. Inquired with R34 about the pills on the bedside table and if he took any, he reported those were his medications and could not remember if he took any of the medications. On 08/06/24 at 11:05 AM, conducted a concurrent interview and record review with Registered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and records review, the facility failed to determine that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and reconciled. This deficient practice increases the risk for diversion of residents' medications. Findings include: Concurrent observation, record review, and interview was conducted during a medication cart check on 08/08/24 at 08:20 AM. The facility document titled, Verification of Controlled Substance Count, dated August 2024, contained a blank spot for the oncoming day shift nurse signature for 08/08/24. Registered Nurse (RN)7 was informed of the missing signature. RN7 was observed placing his signature in the blank space. RN7 stated that he had forgotten to sign his name after he counted the medications with the outgoing night shift nurse. RN7 confirmed that signing the form together with the outgoing shift is the correct process. Interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 08/08/24 at 10:22 AM. DON stated that outgoing and incoming nurses will both go to the medication cart and go…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and act upon a pharmacist's recommendation on a monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for one of five sampled residents (Resident (R) 79). This deficient practice has the potential to negatively affect R79's overall health and well-being. Findings Include: A review of R79's Electronic Health Record (EHR) was conducted. R79's EHR documented a MRR dated 05/31/24. The MRR noted a recommendation by the pharmacist, This resident continues to receive an atypical antipsychotic. Please consider, lipid panel [measurement of cholesterol and triglyceride in the blood], LFT [Liver Function Test], A1C [measurement of the average amount of sugar in the blood in the past few months]. Further review of R79's EHR, did not contain lab results for lipid panel, LFTs, and A1c. An interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted on 08/08/24 at 01:55 PM, near the conference room. DON confirmed that R79's MRR, dated 05/31/24, was not reviewed by the physician. Therefore, the recommendations for the lab work were not completed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to accommodate a diet preference for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R)300). This deficient practice has the potential to affect R300's overall well-being. Findings include: R300 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Interview was conducted with R300 on 08/06/24 at 09:25 AM in R300's room. R300 stated that a dietician and cook had taken notes on his diet/food preference, and he often does not receive what he had requested. When asked what was listed on his preference, R300 stated he was a vegetarian. R300 continued to add that on multiple occasions he was served food that contained meat. R300 stated that he was served spaghetti with meat sauce at one point. He also mentioned two occasions when the kitchen had served him potato chips, when he specifically asked for fries. Interview was conducted with R300 on 08/07/24 at 12:35 PM. R300 was observed eating spaghetti with tomato sauce. R300 stated that the kitchen had originally…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to implement the facility's infection prevention and control measures. While providing care for Resident (R)250, the facility staff was not wearing applicable Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), did not perform hand hygiene between glove change, and did not follow guidelines to prevent possible cross-contamination of clean supplies. These deficient practices placed the resident at risk for developing preventable infections and other adverse health complications. Findings include: Review of R250's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term rehabilitation and long-term intravenous (IV) antibiotics administration. R250 has a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line (tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and threaded into a large vein above the heart to provide intravenous treatments) for the administration of prescribed IV antibiotics. On 08/08/24 at 08:11 AM, observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record/document review, out of a sample of three residents (R), the nursing staff failed to immediately consult one Resident's (R)1 physician when there was a change in condition. In addition, the resident's family was not notified of the change of condition and subsequent transfer to a hospital. As a result of this deficiency, the MD was not aware of the condition change from baseline and was not able to implement interventions which may have prevented further decline. This deficient practice has the potential to affect any resident with a change of condition and may result in harm or death. Findings include: 1) R1 was a [AGE] year old female that was at the facility for short term rehabilitation. Diagnosis included, but not limited to exacerbation of bronchiectasis (chronic lung condition from inflammation and infection), COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, progressive respiratory disorder) with Pseudomonas (bacteria), MAC (uncommon lung disease caused by a specific group of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care that is in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (R)1 and R2, out of a sample size of three. The physician order for R1's oxygen therapy did not include the type of delivery system, when to administer or discontinue the oxygen, and prescribed oxygen flow rates, and R2's oxygen administration was outside the parameters of the physician order. In addition, the facility Oxygen Therapy Protocol does not meet the requirements of a complete order/standing order. These deficient practices could potentially cause harm to any residents who is administered oxygen. Findings Include: 1) R1 was a [AGE] year old female that was transferred to the facility from acute care on 07/19/23 for short term rehabilitation. She had been hospitalized for respiratory failure, and weight loss. Diagnosis included, but not limited to, hypercapnic respiratory failure (usually caused by COPD (chronic obstructive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0713 — isolatedProvide or arrange emergency care by a doctor 24 hours a day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews , medical record and document review, the facility failed to ensure a physician (MD)1 responded when staff attempted to contact him regarding a resident's (R)1 change of condition, on 08/17/2023. As a result of this deficiency, no provider was made aware of R1's status and there were no interventions implemented, that may have prevented further decline of R1's condition. In addition, the facility policy to provide/arrange for provision of physician services 24 hours a day in case of emergency directs staff to contact the medical director if unable to reach the provider, but does not provide arrangements if the medical director does not respond. This deficiency puts all residents at risk of decline which may result in harm or death, if there is not a system in place to reach a physician 24/7 for emergencies. Findings include: 1) On 08/17/2023 at approximately 10:45 PM, Registered Nurse (RN)1 attempted to notify Resident (R)1's physician (MD)1, regarding a change of condition. RN1's progress note read, Writer alerted MD and on-call managers around 2245 (10:45 PM)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to completely screen visitors, guest, vendors for signs and symptoms of COVID-19. As a result of this deficiency, residents, staff, and visitors were at increased risk for contracting the COVID-19 virus. Findings Include: Observation on 08/21/23 at 07:50 AM, there was a passive screening station for COVID-19 at the entrance to the facility. The station prompted visitors, guest, vendors to complete a screening questionnaire related to COVID-19. There was no staff in the immediate vicinity to monitor the station. Upon completion of the questionnaire, there was nothing provided to verify that the screening questionnaire was completed. The visitor, guest, vendor could enter the facility and there was no visual validation to show that the screening for COVID-19 was completed. On 08/21/23 at 08:07 AM, conducted the initial brief tour of the kitchen. Observed outside contractor for pest control walk into the kitchen area from the dining room without a mask. Asked outside contractor if he was supposed to be wearing a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one resident (R), R46, out of two residents sampled, with dignity and respect. This deficient practice has a negative effect on maintaining and enhancing R46's self-esteem and self-worth. The deficient practice has the potential to cause psychosocial harm to R46. Findings Include: R46 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R46 has a diagnosis that include but is not limited to Parkinson's Disease. A review of his most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/23/23 revealed that R46 was determined to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, meaning he was found to be cognitively intact. Observation was conducted on 08/21/23 at 11:18 AM in R46's room. R46 was in the middle of eating a meal. A staff member was in the room handing him a drink. R46 was observed without pants or shorts on. R46 only had a shirt and his incontinence brief. He was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to document an interdisciplinary (IDT, includes but not limited to, the physician, social worker, dietitian, and nurse) assessment and care plan regarding a resident's self-administration of medication. The lack of this process failed to ensure that resident (R), R56, out of a sample of one, was assessed appropriately for having the capability to self-administer his medication safely and correctly. There also was no process to follow-up with R56 to ensure that he retained the capability to self-administer medication. This deficient practice could potentially harm residents who want to self-administer their medication(s). Findings Include: On 08/23/23 at 08:30 AM, conducted a concurrent observation and interview with Registered Nurse (RN)11 while administering R56's medications in R56's room. RN11 stated that R56 was able to administer his own medicated eye drops (Dorzolamide Hcl (Hydrochloride) - Timolol Mal Solution 22.8 - 6.8 mg (milligrams)/ml (milliliter) to treat his glaucoma). RN11 stated that there was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-24 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure a safe and effective transition of care for three of five residents (R), (R64, R82 and R12) in the sample. The facility did not provide a copy of the comprehensive care plan goals to the receiving provider. This deficient practice does not provide an accurate picture of the resident and of his/her needs which will result in poor continuity of care. Findings Include: 1) During an interview on 08/22/23 at 09:01 AM, R64 stated he was recently hospitalized for low blood pressure and pneumonia (lung infection). Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed that R64 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted on [DATE]. R64 was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE] for non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (less severe form of heart attack), respiratory failure, and pneumonia. Documented in the Progress Notes on 07/01/23 at 04:06 PM, . Report including recent labs (laboratory results), AHCD (advanced health care directives), face sheet,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for three of 22 residents (R)26, R34,and R64 in the sample. Care plans and interventions were not personalized to the needs of the residents. As a result of this deficient practice, the residents are at risk of not reaching their highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings Include: 1) Cross Reference F692 Nutrition/Hydration Status Maintenance On 08/21/23 at 01:27 PM, observed R26 in her room with the main entree of her lunch not eaten. The whole broccoli pieces were not eaten and were two inches in length. The meal ticket on R26's tray indicated a regular diet with chopped texture. On 08/22/23 at 12:18 PM, observed R26 in her room with her lunch tray on her bedside table pushed to the left side of her bed. R26's entree of chicken and noodles were not eaten. The chicken piece was approximately 4.5 inches in length and 3 inches wide and not chopped.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain the nutrition status of one Resident (R)26 out of a sample of four residents. R26's diet texture was not provided to her according to the physician's order, which could potentially impact her dietary intake. This deficient practice rendered R26 under nourished and does not allow R26 to live at her highest practicable physical and psychosocial well-being. Findings Include: Cross Reference to F656 Develop/implement Comprehensive Care Plan On 08/21/23 at 01:27 PM, observed R26 in her room with the main entree of her lunch not eaten. The whole broccoli pieces were not eaten and were two inches in length. The meal ticket on R26's tray indicated a regular diet with chopped texture. Record review of R26's electronic health record (EHR). Orders revealed a diet order for Regular diet, Chopped texture, regular/Thin consistency with a start date of 08/08/22. Review of R26's latest care plan for the Focus for Resident is at risk for fluid and nutritional deficit r/t [related to]: variable intake, underwt…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews, and interview, the facility failed to provide respiratory care that is in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (R)64, out of one resident in the sample. The physician order for the use of oxygen did not include the type of delivery system, when to administer or discontinue the oxygen, and prescribed oxygen flow rates. This deficient practice could potentially cause harm to residents due to the lack of physician direction. Findings Include: On 08/21/23 at 09:59 AM, observed R64 sitting up in bed watching television. R64 had a nasal cannula (plastic tubing placed into the nares) connected to an oxygen concentrator set at 2.5 liter per minute. R64 said he was going out for his hemodialysis treatment and will not be back until later that afternoon. Review of the electronic health records (EHR) revealed that R64 was admitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses includes but not limited to end stage renal disease (kidneys are not functioning) with dependence on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and staff interview, the facility failed to communicate two medication recommendations, between the pharmacist and the attending physician, for one resident(R), R51, out of five residents sampled. As a result of this deficiency, the facility put R51 at risk for complications related to medications. Findings Include: Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed R51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including Dementia, Diabetes, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, Hypothyroidism, and Depression. Review of the Medication Regimen Review (MRR) document completed by the Pharmacist dated 02/23/23 read . Will recommend clarification on diagnosis of Sertraline [antidepressant medication] . There was no documentation that this was communicated to the attending physician. Another review of the MRR completed by the Pharmacist dated 05/31/23 read .Will recommend possibility of discontinuing evening supplements to reduce pill burdens at bedtime . There was no documentation that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals are stored in a locked compartment. Proper storage of medications is necessary to promote safe administration practices and to decrease the risk for diversion of resident medications. Findings Include: Concurrent observation and interview were conducted on 08/24/23 at 08:11 AM in the first-floor hallway. A medication cart was observed unlocked in the hallway with staff members, residents, and visitors walking by. This surveyor and Director of Nursing (DON) were present when Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) 1 was interviewed. LPN1 stated, I thought I locked it. He also added that medication carts should always be locked. A review of the facility's policy titled, Medications: Storage, with a revision date of 01/11/23 was conducted. The document indicated, All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to label food items with the dates they were opened to ensure they were not served after the expiration date. As a result of this deficiency, residents, visitors, and staff were put at risk for contracting a foodborne illness. Findings Include: On 08/21/23 at 08:07 AM, conducted the initial brief tour of the kitchen. Observed two thickener containers by the food preparation area that were opened. Both containers did not have a label to indicate when they were initially opened, and both were nearly empty. Observed an open bottle of cranberry juice on another counter that was half full and without a label indicating when it was opened. Interviewed Kitchen Manager (KM) in the kitchen at the end of the intial brief tour conducted on 08/21/23. Queried KM if the thickener and cranberry juice were supposed to be labeled and KM stated staff are supposed to put a sticker on the item with the open date and use-by date written on it. KM asked one of the kitchen staff to put a label with their respective dates on the containers.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$36,296 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $36,296 — penalty dated 2023-08-24
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEE, AMY | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/23/2021 |
| TONOKAWA, DOUGLAS | Individual | W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 01/23/2021 |
| KANAZAWA, ARITOMO | Individual | CORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER | since 03/01/2016 |
| ALOHA MANAGEMENT COMPANY INC | Organization | GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/1990 |
| HEALTH CARE JAPAN CO LTD | Organization | LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST | since 06/01/1990 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $363K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in HI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125038. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.