No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Daniel K Akaka State Veterans Home

91-1204 Kealanani Ave, Kapolei, HI 96707 · Government - State · (808) 861-0926 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (808) 861-0926 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2026
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
 
Urgent care / clinic
91-1054 Haawina St
Pharmacy
599 Farrington Hwy · (808) 674-4477 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.6 mi
590 Farrington Hwy · (808) 674-0070 · Call to confirm hours
Park
91-1101 Kamaaha Loop · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
599 Farrington Hwy · (808) 379-3444

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.8%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%4.9%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%1.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%1.9%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened19.4%20.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.0%9.1%18.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.8%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control34.1%17.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.0%11.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.8%1.4%1.4%worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure opened food was stored in accordance with professional standards for food safety for one of one observed walk-in refrigerator, placing residents at risk for foodborne illness. Specifically, a carton of heavy whipping cream and a large container of raw chicken were not properly stored.Findings Include: On 04/20/26 at 08:27 AM, during an initial kitchen tour with the Dietary Manager (DM), an open carton of heavy whipping cream was observed in the walk-in refrigerator that was not properly sealed or closed. The DM stated the heavy whipping cream is usually stored in another container.Further observation revealed a large container of raw chicken for chicken pot pie. More than half of the chicken was inside a covered bag; however, the remainder of the chicken was left uncovered and exposed to potential contamination. The DM confirmed the chicken should have been fully covered or stored inside the bag.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was free from abuse for one of one resident (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for abuse. Specifically, R7 accused R82 of taking his belonging which resulted in R82 willfully striking R7.Findings Include: On 02/20/26, the facility submitted a completed event report to the State Agency (SA), Intake #2746056. The report documented that on 02/17/26 at 7:23 AM, R7 and R82 were in the dining area during breakfast. While R82 was ambulating to his table, R7 called R82 over. The residents began speaking, which escalated to both residents raising their voices and yelling. Staff responded and attempted to separate the residents. However, before staff could successfully intervene, R82 struck R7 on the forehead. R7 called law enforcement and R82 was taken into custody. Review of the facility's investigation report completed 02/18/26, concluded that the allegation of physical abuse was substantiated. The investigation further documented that R7 demonstrated a lack of trust toward others, exhibited accusatory behavior,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, the facility did not update/revise the care plan for three Residents (R) 3, 7, 8 of nineteen residents reviewed. As a result of the deficient practice there was an increased risk of uncoordinated delivery of care. Findings Include: 1) During Resident interview on 04/20/26 at 09:30 AM, R3 said that he accidentally spilled hot liquid on himself on 04/03/26. Staff interview on 04/22/2026 at 10:20 AM, Staff Nurse 3 was aware of the incident, previously mentioned, and said since the incident they had implemented an intervention where only the kitchen would be allowed to heat up any liquids for the residents. On 04/22/2026 review of the comprehensive care plan for R3 did not include the intervention where only the kitchen would be allowed to heat up any liquids for the residents. Staff interview on 04/22/2026 at 10:25 AM, with Minimum Data Set (MDS) Nurse acknowledged that the comprehensive care plan was not updated to include the previous intervention and said they will make the necessary correction. 2) Resident interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the four resident unit lanai gate alarms were on. The deficient practice could affect all residents who are living on the first floor and are able to walk/wander on their own outside of the unit, putting them at risk for harm. Findings Include:On 04/20/2026 at 10:55 AM Resident (R) 47 was observed sitting in the unit dining room near the nurse's station. R47 was observed not wearing a wanderguard. A concurrent interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN)12 who was sitting at the nurse's station. Surveyor asked RN12 if R47 was wearing a wanderguard and RN12 confirmed resident was not wearing a wanderguard. On 04/20/2026 during a record review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) #2592877, that occurred on 08/17/2025, involving R47, found the facility had shared an initial report to the State Agency (SA), stating: At approximately 9:30 AM, RN noticed resident not seated at the dining room table. Facility Staff immediately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two residents (Resident (R) 41) reviewed for oxygen (O2) services had a physician's order to receive oxygen therapy. The deficient practice placed the resident at risk of receiving unsafe or inappropriate oxygen therapy without proper medical authorization.Findings Include: On 04/20/2026 at 10:02 AM, R41 was observed in his room with O2 concentrator set at 3 litters via nasal cannula. The nasal cannula was not properly placed in the resident's nostrils and was positioned on his cheek. On 04/20/2026 at 10:04 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) 4. RN4 was informed that R41's nasal cannula was not properly placed. RN4 assisted with proper placement and stated that R41 is on continuous oxygen and on comfort measures. On 04/22/26 at 09:57 AM, R41 was observed sleeping in his room with an oxygen concentrator set at 2.5 liters via nasal cannula. On 04/22/26 during review of R41's Electronic Heath Record (EHR), no physician's order for oxygen therapy was found. On 04/22/26 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors related to an antidepressant medication prescribed for one of five residents (Resident (R) 12) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The deficient practice placed the resident at risk for adverse effects and inappropriate medication use. Findings Include: On 04/23/26 review of R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed R12 was prescribed 100 milligrams (mg) of bupropion HCl extended release daily for depression, effective 04/07/26. Behavior monitoring for the antidepressant was not initiated until 04/21/26. From 04/07/26 to 04/21/26, the facility did not document monitoring of R12's behavior related to bupropion use. On 04/23/26 at 12:35 PM, an interview was conducted with Resident Care Manager (RCM) 1. RCM1 confirmed that behavior monitoring should be initiated as soon as the antidepressant is ordered. Review of the facility's policy and procedure Medication Management dated 01/26, indicated After initiating or decreasing the dose of psychotropic medication, the behavioral symptoms must be reevaluated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-23 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one residents (Resident (R) 7) reviewed for rehabilitation services received speech therapy services to attain or restore the resident's highest practicable level of mental, functional, and psychosocial well-being, as the facility did not follow up with the physician to initiate services after a requested speech therapy evaluation to address decreased vocal volume.Findings Include: On 04/20/26 at 12:16 PM, an interview was conducted with R7. R7 stated he was supposed to receive speech therapy due to low vocal volume and had previously received services prior to admission to the facility. R7 further stated that nursing staff told him speech therapy is scheduled on Tuesdays and Thursdays, however, he attends dialysis on those days. R7 did not deny the therapy services, and no one spoke to him of any options to obtain the services. On 04/22/26 at 11:45 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON explained that when a resident requests therapy services, nursing staff submit a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HAWAII HEALTH SYSTEMS CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 08/01/2024
CHEN, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2024
CHUN, BRADLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2024
KELLY, MELANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2024
ODA, WENDELLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2024
TOMITA, BRANDONIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2024
TSUNEISHI, LANIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 08/01/2024
WALKER, KENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2024
AKIYOSHI, DEREKIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
HAMAMOTO, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
SANADA, SEANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
OHANA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
OHANA PACIFIC OAHU SVH, LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/24/2025
PHARMACY CORPORATION OF AMERICAOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/04/2025
KISHABA, RICHARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
KOP, ARNOLDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2024
WEE, CHEREEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
HAWAII HOUSING FINANCE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125070. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next