No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hale Makua - Wailuku

1540 Lower Main Street, Wailuku, HI 96793 · Non profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (808) 243-1722 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (808) 243-1722 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 17 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (24% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (17) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★ 2/5 CMS
Urgent care / clinic
80 Mahalani St · (808) 243-6000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
95 Mahalani St · (808) 446-3348 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1500 Lower Main St · (808) 298-0101 · Call to confirm hours
Park
700 Halia Nakoa St · (808) 270-7230 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1218 Lower Main St · (808) 463-0913

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.3%16.8%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.6%4.9%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.9%1.0%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.5%2.4%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.9%1.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.3%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%1.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%20.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication8.5%9.1%18.9%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.5%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%3.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control17.5%17.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.4%11.9%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.9%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.4%84.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.1%19.4%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.8%10.3%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.101.091.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.820.881.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

68.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 100 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

68.1%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
56.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.22U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 56.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 66 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 33% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF68.1%CMS range 61.3–77.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 5.8–14.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge56.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge45.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.5%CMS range 4.2–11.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.731.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.36
RN hours/ resident / day
0.65
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.60
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.97
RN hoursweekends
23.8%
Total nursing turnover
25.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.61 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.36 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.86 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.51 to 0.97 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

3
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
5
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-15)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the State Long Term Care Ombudsmen (LTCO) was provided written notification of resident's transfer/discharge from the facility for two of three residents sampled for hospitalizations. Findings include: On 01/28/26 at 3:40 PM, requested a copy of the written notification of transfer/discharge to the LTCO, for Resident (R) 76's transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. On 01/29/26 at 11:32 AM, reviewed a notification of transfer/discharge. The notification provided, documented it was faxed to the LTCO on 01/28/26 at 4:32 PM, after the documentation was requested by the surveyor. On 01/30/26 at 8:27 AM, conducted an interview with the Social Worker (SW) regarding R76's notice of transfer to the LTCO. The SW confirmed the notification to the LTCO was not sent and that the notification is normally faxed within a day or two of the resident's transfer, but in this case, the family did not sign the document, and it was not sent to the LTCO. 2) On 01/28/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement the fall risk plan of care for fall mats to be placed at the sides of the bed for one out of 19 residents sampled for comprehensive care plan review. The deficient practice increased the resident's risk for falls.Findings Include:On 01/27/2026 at 1;00 PM, observed Resident (R) 47 sitting in a wheelchair outside his room. R47 had on a right arm sling. When asked what happened to his right arm, R47 stated he fell yesterday around 3:00 PM when he tried to pick up something he had dropped on the floor. R47 said that he had to be taken to the emergency room (ER) for evaluation and is awaiting the results of his x-ray. R47 stated he is weak on his right side due to a previous stroke and has blurred vision. On 1/28/26 at 08:32 AM, observed R47 asleep in bed and no floor mats in place. At 11:00 AM, observed R47 outside in wheelchair. No floor mats in place in room or at bedside.On 1/29/26 at 08:30 AM, observed R47 asleep in bed and no fall mats in place.On 01/29/26 at 10:05 AM, interview with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to remove R6's pressure dressing after four hours from the completion of his hemodialysis (HD) treatment for one of two residents sampled for dialysis services. The deficient practice was not consistent with professional standards of practice and put the resident at risk for complications to his access site.Findings Include:On 01/28/2026 08:45 AM, observed Resident (R) 6's left upper arm (LUA) fistula pressure dressing still on from the previous day which was more than 15 hours after he completed the dialysis treatment. R6 said that he came back from dialysis yesterday around 5:00 PM and that staff sometimes do not check his fistula access every shift and will leave the dressing on because of bleeding. At 09:00 AM, conducted an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) 1. When asked what the facility's policy was on removing a pressure dressing after a resident return from their hemodialysis treatment, RN1 stated she was not sure but would find out. At 10:30 AM, RN1 informed the surveyor that they can remove…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to store food kept in the freezer at 0 degrees Fahrenheit or less. This deficient practice puts all the residents at risk for foodborne illness, Findings Include: On 11/12/24 at 09: 48 AM during initial tour of the kitchen interviewed kitchen staff (KS)1. Inquired about temperature log for the freezer that showed temperatures logged from 0 to 6 degrees Fahrenheit. Review of the Freeze Temp Record form has standard Freeze temperature less than or equal to 0. Review of this form found a row for re check temp and maintenance notified boxes which were left blank. The temperatures above 0 degrees (8) did not have re check temp and maintenance notified filled out. Inquired of KS1 if she is supposed to re-check the temperature of the freezer or notify maintenance and KS1 stated she rechecked the temperatures but did not document it. Continued review of this form found the following # temps in acceptable range:, # times temps to be taken, and % compliance. On 11/15/24 at 10:13 AM a phone interview was conducted with the Acting Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-15 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespread
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to prevent flies and a bird from entering the dining room while residents were eating their lunch and lunch trays were being made. This deficient practice puts the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings Include: On 11/14/24 at 11:45 AM while observing kitchen staff put containers of uncovered hot food onto the trayline observed there were flies near the trayline flying above the open food. Food Service Director (FSD) shooed away the flies and covered the food with aluminum foil. FSD spoke with kitchen staff to remind her to cover the food with lids or foil as she is placing the containers on the trayline to prevent flies from going into the food. During this time a small bird was observed flying in the dining room and landed on the counter next to the microwave. On 11/14/24 at 01:00 PM interviewed FSD and inquired about the flies that were observed during the trayline. FSD stated she spoke with kitchen staff about covering the food with lids when it is on the trayline. FSD also stated she asked the facility to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to protect Resident (R)47's privacy while receiving peri-care (washing the genitals and anal area) exposing R47's naked body from the waist down to her roommate, R52. This deficient practice puts all residents who require assistance from staff, such as peri-care, at risk for being exposed to others causing psychological harm. Findings Include: On 11/12/24 at 11:40 AM surveyor walked into R47's room. The privacy curtain was pulled to block anyone from the outside walkway seeing R47 who at this time was having peri-care done by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA)1. Surveyor walked further into the room and observed R47's roommate, R52, sitting in a recliner facing R47's bed. The privacy curtain was too short to go around R47's bed and R47's genitalia was exposed to R52. Inquired with CNA1 about the privacy curtain and she stated it was not big enough to go around the resident's bed and she showed surveyor how R52's privacy curtain goes around the bed. Surveyor pulled on R47's privacy curtain and found it was not big…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to store one oxygen cylinders (O2 tank) in a safe manner. As a result of this deficient practice, the facility put the safety and well-being of the residents, staff, as well as the public at risk for accident hazards. Findings include: During an observation of a resident's room in Lanai Nursing Neighborhood on 11/12/24 at 11:45 AM, one O2 tank was leaning upright and propped between the bedside drawer and wall. The O2 tank was not in a Oxygen Cylinder Cart and there was increase risk for the O2 tank falling over. Staff interview on 11/12/24 at 11:50 AM, Staff Nurse (Nurse) 2 acknowledged that the O2 tank was not stored properly and there was risk for it falling over. Nurse 2 then took the O2 tank to be properly stored in the Oxygen Cylinder Cart.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interview, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program relating to birds. As a result of this deficiency, there was increase risk of disease outbreak in the facility. Findings include: During observation of the Lanai Nursing Neighborhood on 11/14/24 at 09:05 AM, three birds were seen in the resident's room. One bird was on the foot of the resident's bed and the other two birds were moving around on the floor. Other resident rooms had screen door barriers but this room did not. Staff interview on 11/15/24 at 10:15 AM, Director of Nursing (DON) said they were aware of the birds entering the resident rooms, but they did not have written standards, policies, procedures or a system of surveillance.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure food and drink items were stored in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents who have their meals served by the facility placing them at risk for food-borne illnesses. Findings include: On 04/30/24 at 10:03 AM, initial tour of the off-site kitchen conducted with the Nutrition Service Director (NSD). During the inspection of the walk-in refrigerator, an opened one-gallon jug of milk was found without an open and discard date. NSD confirmed that the opened jug of milk was not labeled properly. Another refrigerator was inspected just outside the walk-in refrigerator. Two opened bottles of juice and two opened jars of mayonnaise were found with no open and discard dates. NSD confirmed that the items were not labeled properly and said that the staff are usually good at making sure all food items are labeled as soon as they are opened. Inspected freezer near the food preparation area, found a partially covered box of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview with one Resident (R)42 of seven residents sampled, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations related to R42's showering and meals. As a result of this deficiency, there was risk for decline of R42's maintenance of independent functioning, dignity and well-being. Findings include: During resident interview on 05/02/24 at 09:30AM, R42 stated when facility staffing was short, it would take around thirty minutes to an hour for staff to respond to his call light. R42 said he needed assistance reaching for the soap when taking a shower. Also, it would take longer (around forty-five minutes) for staff to deliver meals to resident's rooms when short staffed. Review of Electronic Health Record showed that R42 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Respiratory Failure, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Pulmonary Edema, Congestive Heart Failure, Atrial Fibrillation, Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Cardiomegaly, Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to appropriately perform diabetes management for 1 of 18 residents (Resident 22) in the sample by failing to ensure his blood sugars were measured, and his sliding scale insulin was administered at the appropriate times. As a result of this deficient practice, Resident (R)22 was placed at risk for an avoidable decline and/or injury related to his diabetes. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility with insulin-dependent diabetes. Findings include: 1) Resident (R)22 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include spondylosis, lumbosacral region (age-related change of the bones (vertebrae) and discs of the lower spine, causing pain), fusion of spine, thoracic region (a surgical procedure in which two or more bones (vertebrae) of the upper and middle part of the back are joined together), osteoarthritis, right shoulder (the wearing down of the protective tissue at the ends of bones), chronic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 7 residents (Residents 62 and 29) sampled were free from accident hazards. The facility failed to develop effective interventions to prevent avoidable falls for Resident (R)62, and R29 was transferred from his bed to a shower chair using a mechanical lift device he had not been evaluated as safe to use. Placing residents at risk of avoidable accidents and injuries by not providing the appropriate assessments, planning, monitoring, and recommendations, and/or implementing the appropriate interventions is a deficient practice that has the potential to affect all the residents at the facility. Findings include: 1) R62 is a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but are not limited to traumatic brain injury following a motor vehicular accident; fractures to base of skull, maxilla (upper jawbone), orbit (eye socket), nasal bones, right clavicle (collar bone), and left carpal bone (wrist); and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview and review of policy, the facility failed to label the humidified sterile water bottle for one Resident (R)177 of five residents sampled. As a result of this deficiency, the facility put R177 at increase risk for sterile water contamination. Findings include: During observation of R177's oxygen delivery set up on 05/01/24 at 08:30 AM, the humidified Sterile Water Bottle was not labeled with the date and time opened. Staff interview on 05/01/24 at 08:40 AM, Charge Nurse (CN)2 acknowledged that the Sterile Water Bottle should have been labeled with the date and time opened and initials. CN2 subsequently replaced the oxygen delivery/sterile water bottle with new equipment. Review of facility policy on Oxygen Administration read Purpose; To deliver oxygen to the guest/resident when insufficient oxygen is being carried by the blood to the tissues. Procedure . c. Attach humidifier to flowmeter by screwing nut onto the flow meter if needed. If the humidifier has an audible alarm, check this by adjusting the flow rate and pinching the tubing until the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to manage pain adequately for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 22) sampled for pain. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that Resident (R)22's pain regimen was implemented on a timely basis. As a result of this deficient practice, R22 was prevented from attaining or maintaining his highest practicable level of well-being. Findings include: Resident (R)22 is a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include but are not limited to, spondylosis, lumbosacral region (age-related change of the bones (vertebrae) and discs of the lower spine, causing pain), fusion of spine, thoracic region (a surgical procedure in which two or more bones (vertebrae) of the upper and middle part of the back are joined together), osteoarthritis, right shoulder (the wearing down of the protective tissue at the ends of bones), and chronic pain. On 05/01/24 at 08:55 AM, an interview was done with R22 at his bedside. R22 was sitting up in bed with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services included an effective process to provide routine drugs to meet the needs of the residents, and failed to dispose of medications past their expiration date. As a result of this deficient practice, 2 residents (Residents 33 and 14) had routine medications that were out of stock, and residents who needed intravenous fluid were placed at risk of receiving expired fluids. This deficient practice has the potential to affect any patient taking medication. Findings include: 1) On [DATE] at 08:43 AM, while observing medication pass with Registered Nurse (RN)8, it was noted that the Losartan (a medication for high blood pressure) 100 milligrams due at 09:00 AM for Resident (R)14 was out of stock. RN8 stated he would check the emergency kit (E-kit) for it. On [DATE] at 09:08 AM, RN8 confirmed that there was no Losartan in the E-kit. RN8 called the pharmacy to check on when it would be delivered and stated he would also call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%, as evidenced by 2 medication errors observed out of 28 opportunities for errors, for an error rate of 7%. Safe and timely medication administration practices are essential for the health and well-being of the residents. As a result of this deficient practice, two residents were placed at risk of negative outcomes due to medication errors. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents in the facility taking medications administered by staff. Findings include: 1) On 05/02/24 at 08:43 AM, observed medication pass with Registered Nurse (RN)8 as he prepared and gave medications to Resident (R)14. Observed RN8 prepare R14's Polyethylene Glycol (a laxative) 17 grams (gm) using 8 ounces of water, split into two 4-ounce cups. One cup of prepared liquid was administered with R14's other oral medications. The second cup of prepared liquid (with half of the Polyethylene Glycol dose) was left at the bedside with R14 while RN8 left the room to prepare and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-03 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, staff interviews, record reviews and review of policy, the facility failed to ensure that two Residents (R)23, R25 of seven residents sampled understood the Binding Arbitration Agreement. As a result of this deficiency, R23, R25 did not fully understand the details of the Agreement. Findings include: R23 interviewed on 05/01/24 at 02:45 PM, stated that she did not remember signing the Binding Arbitration Agreement. Also, did not know what the Agreement was about. Review of Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed that R23 was admitted to the facility 05/22/23 and signed the Binding Arbitration Agreement 05/28/23. R25 interviewed on 05/01/24 at 03:10 PM, stated that she signed all admission papers but did not remember the discussion of the Binding Arbitration Agreement. Also, R25 was not familiar with any details of the Agreement when presented to her. Review of EHR showed that R25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and signed her own Binding Arbitration Agreement 05/28/23. Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHUN, GRANTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
DORHEIM, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/17/2025
KISHABA, RICHARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
LO, WESLEYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
MCBARNET, ALEXANDERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2015
MUNEKIYO, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2015
NISHITA, JOSIAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/01/2020
ROMSON, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
SAKAMOTO, ROYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2015
WACHI, EILEENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/01/2017
OHANA PACIFIC MANAGEMENT COMPANY INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
LORE, ANDREWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
MATTFELD, PAULIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/11/2025
MCCLENNON, PAMELAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MORIKUNI, SUANNEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2020
COUNTY OF MAUI-DEPARTMENT OF FINANCEOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2018
KOP, ARNOLDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$47.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-11.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 5%Other / private 26%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,964per resident / day
operating cost
$59,716per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,766per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in HI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Hawaii Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Hawaii
$15,473/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$16,395/mo
Nursing home (private)
$12,096/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 125056. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next