Sunny View Care Center
410 N W Ash Drive, Ankeny, IA 50023 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 94 certified beds · (515) 964-1101 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (42) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 31.9% | 17.1% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 12.2% | 4.6% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.8% | 1.5% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 2.4% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 4.2% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.6% | 3.8% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 25.0% | 16.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 17.1% | 20.8% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.2% | 95.3% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.4% | 4.2% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 25.6% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.4% | 19.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 2.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 76.6% | 73.3% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.6% | 20.9% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.0% | 13.2% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.35 | 1.49 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.83 | 2.08 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 71 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 58 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.19 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 20% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 56.4%CMS range 45.2–69.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.2–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.1% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 41.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 32.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 71.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 75.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.4%CMS range 3.8–12.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.81 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 94 beds and averages 87.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.21 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
42 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-04-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the 5 rights of medication administration were followed resulting in 1 of 1 residents receiving another resident's medications (Resident #6) in addition to the resident's own medication which required an admission to the hospital due to sinus bradycardia (resting heart rate that is slower than normal) requiring further hemodynamic (blood flow movement and circulation through the heart and blood vessels) monitoring. The facility reported a census of 92 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #6's census in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed the resident was hospitalized [DATE] to 3/23/26. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #6, dated 2/24/26 revealed a list of diagnoses which included hypertension, Alzheimer's disease and toxic encephalopathy (change in how the brain functions). The MDS indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-16 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, resident interview, family interview, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment and evaluation of a resident for readmission to the facility, and failed to have the appropriate documentation in the medical record prior to issuing an involuntary discharge to 1 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge (Resident #1). This failure caused the resident to experience a negative impact on her psycho-social well being. The facility further failed to have the resident or the resident representative sign the discharge summary. The facility reported a census of 91 residents. Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Resident #1 scored a 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), indicating intact cognition. The resident had diagnoses to include progressive neurological conditions, Multiple Sclerosis (MS), anxiety disorder, depression and functional quadriplegia (a symptom of paralysis that affects all a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview and policy review the facility staff failed to provide care for a resident in an environment that maintained or enhanced dignity for two of five residents observed and required assistance for eating. The facility reported a census of 81 residents.Findings include: Observations on 1/12/2026 at 9AM revealed the following: Staff H, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) in the dining room (DR) sitting beside a resident with but not interacting with the resident, having a personal conversation with Staff G, [NAME] as she walked around the DR cleaning up tables. Staff H would provide the resident a bite of food and continue to observe and talk to Staff G. Staff F, CNA was sitting between 2 residents, feeding 1 resident while the other resident independently fed herself. Staff F proceeded to engage in conversation with the independent resident, provide the other resident a bite of food and then proceed back to the conversation with the other resident. Staff F would only look at the resident when she provided him a bite of food and then the resident would have to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, providers' orders review and IPOST review, the facility failed to have the updated IPOST (Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment) for 1 out of 24 residents reviewed (Resident #8). Resident had a provider's order directing the code status for Resident #8 was Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) and an IPOST directing the code status for Resident #8 was CPR (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation)/Attempt Resuscitation. The facility reported a census of 82 residents Findings include: An IPOST dated [DATE], directed staff to perform CPR on Resident #8 in the absence of breathing and a heart beat. On [DATE] on 2:34 p.m., Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), stated to check a resident's code status she would look in the electronic health record (EHR). When asked if it would be anywhere else, she said 'you could look in their chart too.' On [DATE] at 10:15 a.m., it was noted that Resident #8 had a Dr's order for DNR in his EHR, but in his hard chart the IPOST directed CPR. On [DATE] at 10: 45 a.m., Staff B, Licensed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to provide the required Center for Medicare Services (CMS) Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) forms to address beneficiary appeals and liability notice for one of three residents reviewed for advanced beneficiary notices (ABN) (Resident #72). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #72 had skilled services 11/18/25 to 11/22/25 and remained in the facility. The record also revealed the facility issued the Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non Coverage (SNFABN) CMS form #10055 and obtained verbal consent from the Power Of Attorney on 11/20/25 for therapy services that ended 11/22/25. However, the facility failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non Coverage (NOMNC) CMS Form #10123 regarding the right to appeal further skilled therapy services within the required 48 hours of skilled serviced ending on 11/22/25. In an interview 1/14/26 at 7:30 AM, the Social Worker reported she provided the SNF ABN forms whenever skilled services…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observations, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 3 residents' property was inventoried and failed to replace his personal property after he reported that it was missing (Resident #81). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #81 included COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), anxiety and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), revealed a score of 13 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. On 1/11/26 at 2:40 p.m., Resident #81 stated his only concern is that he is missing some of his things from when he moved to his current room from another room. He stated he was missing a narrow cabinet that also was an instrument from [NAME], 2 large books from [NAME] and Noble, and a statue about 1 1/2 feet tall (showed height with his hands). He said he would appreciate this being looked into. A Grievance Log provided by the facility showed a list of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to complete upon discharge the recapitulation for a resident's stay for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #95). The facility reported a census of 81 residents. The Discharge Minimum Data Set for Resident #95, dated 12/1/25, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged to home/community on 12/1/25. Review of Resident #95's clinical record lacked a recapitulation of stay. Facility Discharge Policy with Criteria, undated, instructed the facility staff will develop a post-discharge plan of care and a discharge recapitulation form will be completed. Interview on 01/14/2026 at 1:19 PM, the Director of Nursing stated he was unable to find that a recapitulation of the resident's stay was completed. Interview on 1/14/2026 at 1:20 PM, the Chief Nursing Officer stated her expectation for a recapitulation of the resident's stay to be initiated by the social worker and then completed by each department…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 out of 1 resident reviewed received his prescribed medication upon a hospital return (Resident #8). Resident #8 returned from the hospital on [DATE] and did not receive the majority of his medications until 1/2/26 and 1/3/26. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include:A Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #8 included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes, arthritis, non-Alzheimer's dementia, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), obesity, and low back pain. A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS), revealed a score of 13 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. This MDS indicated that Resident #8 was taking antipsychotic, antidepressant, diuretic, antiplatelet, hypoglycemic (including insulin) and anticonvulsant medications. A Nurse's Progress Note dated 12/31/25 at 2:57 p.m., documented that at 1:30 p.m., Resident #8 arrived from hospital after a lengthy stay…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #44 and Resident #68). The facility failed to ensure use of enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) when required. The facility reported a census of 81 residents. Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #44, dated 12/3/25, included diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and retention of urine. The MDS identified the resident was dependent on staff for toilet hygiene. The MDS indicated the resident had a indwelling catheter (tube into bladder to drain the urine from the bladder). The MDS indicated the resident had a BIMS score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Resident #44's Care Plan with target date 3/3/26, documented the resident had an indwelling catheter and intervention to utilize enhanced barrier precautions per policy related to the foley catheter. Observation on 1/12/26 at 1:47 PM, Staff I, Certified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-07-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to maintain mechanical and electrical patient care equipment in safe operating condition for 5 out of 5 residents reviewed (Residents #1, #7, #10, #11, and #12). Resident's #1 and #12 had care delayed related to batteries not working in stand lifts. Resident #7's bed would raise but not lower (beds in low position are a standard of safety). During separate observations of Residents #10 and #11 it was observed that 1 of the 4 wheels on the mechanical lift used to transfer the residents came off of the ground during the transfer. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include: 1. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #1 included multiple sclerosis (MS), anxiety and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. This resident was dependent on staff for toilet transfers, sit to stand, and for chair/bed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity was promoted for 2 out of 2 residents (Resident #1 and Resident #12). The facility had ongoing issues with batteries not staying charged in stand lifts used for daily transferring of residents. Resident #1 waited 30 minutes after staff answered her call light to toilet her related to 2 different batteries not working and the need to go get another stand lift from the other side of the building. A stand lift battery died after staff raised Resident #12 to a standing position and could not lower her due to the lift's battery dying. She remained in the standing position until staff could retrieve another battery. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include: 1. A Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented diagnoses for Resident #1 included Multiple Sclerosis (MS), anxiety and depression. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 15 out of 15, which indicated intact…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow document and/or carry out physician orders for 2 of 16 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and Resident #3). Resident #2 had an order to check her oxygen saturation (POx) once per shift. She had a second PRN (as needed order) to apply oxygen if the oxygen saturation was below 90%. There was no documentation of oxygen application for oxygen saturation below 90%. Resident #3 had an order to check Hgb A1c (a test that measures the average blood sugar) every 6 months. This was not done. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented Resident #2's diagnoses included heart failure and non-Alzheimer's dementia. A Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) documented a score of 4 out of 15, which indicated severely impaired cognition. This resident received oxygen treatment. A Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for June 2025 and printed on 6/25/25 at 3:33…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure doctor's orders for oxygen (O2) were being followed for 3 out of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2, #8 and #9. Resident #2 had an order for PRN (as needed) oxygen to be placed when her oxygen saturation was below 90%. Documentation showed she had a least 2 occasions when her oxygen saturation read by a pulse oximeter (Pox) was 89% and oxygen was not documented as being applied. Staff reported not knowing there was an order for PRN oxygen, but they were applying oxygen without clarifying the order. Residents #8 and #9 were observed to have oxygen administered at flow rates that differed from their doctor ordered oxygen flow rates. The facility was not documenting what the liter flow was for oxygen saturation readings on an oxygen order that was to be titrated between 2 and 4 liters(L) per Resident #8's needs. The facility reported a census of 86 residents. Findings include: 1. A Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE],…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for discharge planning (Resident #15 and Resident #16). The facility reported a census of 86. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) of Resident #15 dated 4/8/25 recorded a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) Score of 12, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The Care Plan, last reviewed on 4/22/25, failed to reflect a discharge plan for Resident #15. The Care Conference Review Notes dated 1/10/25 recorded the presence of the social services representative at the care conference. The Notes revealed Resident #15's daughter requested a referral to be made to another facility in the resident's home town for the resident to move to. The Care Conference Review Notes dated 4/15/25 recorded the presence of the social services representative at the care conference. The Notes revealed Resident #15's daughter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility policy/procedures the facility failed to clarify a medication when a resident was admitted on [DATE] for which delayed the resident getting the medication as directed until 4/7/25. (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Finding include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #1, with an assessment reference dated 4/7/25, documented diagnoses for which included anemia, hypertension, benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and arthritis. The MDS revealed the resident with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 for which indicated no memory impairments and requiring partial to moderate assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The MDS documented no mood disorders and able to be understood and understand others. The Plan of Care with an initiated date of 4/4/25, had a focus area of ADL Care-Resident requires assistance with ADL's secondary to lumbar spine fusion procedure. Intervention include:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interview, and facility cleaning procedures, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms were free of odors to create a home-like environment for 1 of 59 resident rooms (Resident #71). The facility reported a census of 82. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses on the MDS include anxiety, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), chronic pain syndrome, depression, diabetes, hemiplegia, non-Alzheimer dementia, Parkinsons, and prostate cancer. The MDS noted Resident #17 utilizes either a walker or wheelchair for mobility. The Care Plan with a completion date of 12/2/24 indicated Resident #71 has had falls with minor injury due to poor balance. Interventions included staff to check urinal frequently and empty if needed to prevent spills. During an observation on 2/10/25 at 11:10 AM, an ammonia odor was present in the hallway from Resident #71's room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, family and staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 20 residents (#32). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: 1. On 2/10/25 at 3:56 PM, Resident #32's visitor stated the resident missed several doses of Calcium Carbonate (Tums) during the last week of October 2024. She also stated there were several occasions when the resident's Voltaren External gel (topical analgesic used to treat pain and inflammation) was not given until after the prescribed time. On 2/10/25 at 5:29 PM, the resident's relative stated the resident received the Tums to provide calcium for a previously fractured T12 vertebrae. She also stated the Volteran gel was to be applied for the same reason. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #32 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not obtained because the resident was rarely/never understood. It included diagnoses of Heart Failure,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on health record review, facility document review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to communicate throughout departments current resident staff assistance level for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for nursing supervision (Resident #71). The facility reported a census of 82. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #71 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses on the MDS include anxiety, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), chronic pain syndrome, depression, diabetes, hemiplegia, non-Alzheimer dementia, and Parkinsons. The MDS noted Resident #17 utilizes either a walker or wheelchair for mobility. The MDS revealed Resident #71 is independent with chair/bed-to-chair transfers, toilet transfers, and walk 10 feet. The MDS recorded no falls since prior assessment. The Care Plan with a completion date of 12/2/24 indicated Resident #71 has a self-care performance deficit related to stroke with left-sided…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide resident assistance or follow-up with medical equipment for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care (Resident #235). The facility reported a census of 82. Findings include: The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #235 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses on the MDS include anemia, atrial fibrillation, hip fracture, obstruction sleep apnea, and osteoporosis. The facility admission date documented as 1/28/25. The Care Plan revised on 2/11/25, indicated Resident #235 had a self-care performance deficit due to right shoulder fracture and left femur fracture. Interventions include staff assist of 1 with a hemi-walker for transfer inside the room, weight-bearing as tolerated to left lower extremity, and staff assist of 1 to turn and reposition in bed. The Care Plan indicated Resident #235 is a fall risk due to weakness, decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a yearly psychotropic medication (a medication that affects a person's mental state) gradual dose reduction (GDR) was attempted or appropriately declined for 3 of 3 resident (#32, #44, & #66). The facility reported a census of 82. Findings included 1. On 2/11/25 at 11:00 AM, Resident #32 was identified as a resident who received psychotropic medications. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #32 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was not obtained because the resident was rarely/never understood. It included diagnoses of Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), Diabetes Mellitus (DM), chronic pain, anxiety, and spinal stenosis (narrowed spinal canal). It also revealed the resident required setup assistance with eating, supervision with oral and personal hygiene, maximal assistance with toileting hygiene and bathing, and was dependent with all other aspects of Activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #5) for weight monitoring. The facility failed to obtain weights per physician order. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings includes: Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, which indicated intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #5 was dependent on staff for bed mobility. The MDS documented Resident #5 did not get out of bed during the assessment period. The MDS revealed Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Resident #5's MDS included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (urinary bladder problems due to disease or injury to the central nervous system), septicemia (blood infection), urinary tract infection (UTI) in the last 30 days, quadriplegia (paralysis that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and policy review the facility failed to provide bathing assistance for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for bathing (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: Resident #1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10, which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #1 required substantial/maximal assistance shower or bathing. Resident #1's MDS included diagnoses of cancer, anemia, coronary artery disease (CAD) hypertension (high blood pressure), cirrhosis of the liver, and right humerus fracture. The Progress Note dated 7/16/24 revealed Resident #1 was admitted to the facility from the hospital. The Care Plan with a revised date of 07/18/24 identified Resident #1 required assistance of 1 staff member to provide showering tasks at least twice weekly and as necessary. The facility form titled Shower/Bath for July and August 2024…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to provide interventions necessary for the care and services, to maintain the residents' highest practical physical well- being for 1 of 6 resident reviewed (Resident #2). The facility failed to complete and document nursing assessments including neurological assessments after a report that a resident had hit his head on a wall. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #2 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident #2 ' s MDS included diagnoses of anemia, coronary artery disease (CAD) hypertension (high blood pressure), renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer's dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Care Plan with initiated date of [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, observations, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 1 of 1 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 05, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #2 required substantial/maximal assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Resident #2 ' s MDS included diagnoses of anemia, coronary artery disease (CAD) hypertension (high blood pressure), renal disease (kidney), diabetes mellitus, non-Alzheimer ' s dementia, anxiety, and depression. The Care Plan with initiated date of 12/5/23 revealed Resident #2 required total care in all activities of daily living (ADLs) secondary to decreased mobility related to right hip fracture, chronic pain and dementia. The care plan also…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-08-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and clinical record review the facility failed to monitor and provide appropriate urinary assessment after a indwelling catheter was removed for 1 of 4 residents reviewed (Resident #4) for catheters. The facility also failed to document accurate urine output and follow a physician order when inserting an indwelling catheter. The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not able to be completed. A Staff Assessment for Mental Status indicated Resident #4 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS identified Resident #4 was dependent on staff for bed mobility, transfers and toileting. The MDS revealed Resident #4 had an indwelling catheter, and was always incontinent of bowel. Resident #4's MDS included diagnoses of down syndrome, anxiety, depression, and non-Alzheimer's dementia. The Care Plan dated 6/27/24 revealed Resident #4 had a urinary catheter…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 2 of 4 resident reviewed for catheter care (Resident #5 and #3). The facility reported a census of 82 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessment identified a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating intact cognition. The MDS identified Resident #5 was dependent on staff for bed mobility. The MDS documented Resident #5 did not get out of bed during the assessment period. The MDS revealed Resident #5 had an indwelling catheter and was always incontinent of bowel. Resident #5's MDS included diagnoses of neurogenic bladder (urinary bladder problems due to disease or injury to the central nervous system), septicemia (blood infection), urinary tract infection (UTI) in the last 30 days, and quadriplegia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, a photograph and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly provide perineal cares for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and #3 ). The facility identified a census of 88 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #2 required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, and ambulation. The listed Resident #2 as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of renal insufficiency (inadequate functioning kidneys), polyneuropathy (multiple areas of nerve damage that causes numbness, pain, and tingling), anxiety, and non Alzheimer's dementia. The Care Plan Focus revised 6/20/23 indicated Resident #2 had an activities of daily living (ADL) self care performance deficit related to (r/t) weakness, shortness of breath, an unsteady gait, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on family interview, resident interview, staff interview, Ombudsman email, Resident Council Minutes, and facility policy review the facility failed to answer resident call lights within 15 minutes for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Residents #2 and #5). The facility identified a census of 88 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #2 required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, and ambulation. The listed Resident #2 as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of renal insufficiency (inadequate functioning kidneys), polyneuropathy (multiple areas of nerve damage that causes numbness, pain, and tingling), anxiety, and non Alzheimer's dementia. On 5/22/24 at 12:36 PM Resident #2's family member reported she timed Resident #2's activated call light for 30 45 plus minutes. On a couple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to maintain a complete and accurate Care Plan for 1 of 3 resident's reviewed (Resident #2). The facility identified a census of 88 residents. Findings included Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] identified Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8, indicating moderately impaired cognition. Resident #2 required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet use, personal hygiene, and ambulation. The listed Resident #2 as frequently incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of renal insufficiency (inadequate functioning kidneys), polyneuropathy (multiple areas of nerve damage that causes numbness, pain, and tingling), anxiety, and non Alzheimer's dementia. Resident #2's Care Plan failed to address her continence status. An email dated 6/4/24 at 12:30 PM, from the Director of Clinical Services confirmed Resident #2's Care Plan didn't address incontinence. The Care Plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview and staff interview, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #13). In addition, the facility failed to properly administer medications according to the nursing standards of practice for 2 of 3 residents (Residents #12 and #11). The facility identified a census of 88 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #13's Medication Administration Audit Report dated 5/22/24 at 11:16 AM directed the facility staff to administer the following medications at 6 AM. The documentation reflected Staff G, Certified Medication Aide (CMA), administered the medications at 8:48 AM a. Apixaban (blood thinner) oral tablet 5 milligrams (mg) one (1) tablet by mouth (po) two (2) times a day (BID). b. Famotidine (prostate health) oral tablet 20 mg po in the morning (AM). c. Losartan Potassium (blood pressure) oral tablet 25 mg po in the AM. d. Baclofen (muscle relaxer) oral tablet po BID. e. Spironolactone (water pill) oral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to assess and implement interventions for a 1 of 3 residents following a fall (Resident #3). The facility identified a census of 88 residents. Findings include: Resident #3's MDS assessment form dated 4/16/24 identified a BIMS score of 4, indicating severely impaired cognition. Resident #3 required substantial/maximal assistance with toilet hygiene. The assessment listed Resident #3 as always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS included diagnoses of fractures, non Alzheimer's dementia, bell's palsy and weakness. The Progress Note dated 5/13/24 at 10:29 AM indicated Resident #3 sustained an unwitnessed fall without injury in her room at 7:30 AM. Resident #3's clinical record lacked follow-up assessments following the fall on 5/13/24. According to an email dated 6/5/24 at 1:51 PM the Director of Clinical Services confirmed they expected the staff to perform follow-up assessments following a fall for 72-hours.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to answer call lights in a timely manner within 15 minutes for one of two nursing units reviewed. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident interviews revealed the following: On 3/4/23 at 11:19 AM, Resident #84 reported it took staff 45 minutes to respond to his call light. The resident reported he had a clock on the wall to know the time and how long it took staff. The resident reported he required the assistance of two staff and it took longer to find staff to help. On 3/4/24 at 11:53 AM, Resident #139 reported the facility didn't have enough help. The resident reported he waited 30-40 minutes for staff to come and assist him. The resident stated he didn't want to have an incontinence episode. He has had staff tell him to go in pants but he wasn't brought up that way. The resident reported he fell on 3/3/24 around 9 PM. He had his call light on, he had to go to the bathroom and couldn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide a clean and sanitary environment when they failed to clean shower chairs between residents. The facility also failed to create and implement a water control plan to protect the facility from legionella and other water borne illnesses. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: 1. A direct observation of a PVC bariatric shower chair on 03/05/2024 at 11:33 AM showed the inner rim of the shower chair seat had a visible smear of brown debride that appeared to be feces. A second surveyor confirmed the smear on the shower chair appeared to be feces. At 11:51 AM, Staff F, Universal worker took the soiled shower chair into Resident # 40's room to prepare her for a shower. A direct observation on 03/05/24 at 12:40 PM of a standard shower chair in use by Staff I for various residents without sanitizing between residents. The standard shower chair was placed in the hallway still visibly wet without being disinfected. A second direct observation of a PVC bariatric shower chair on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to notify residents families of falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #40). The facility reported a census of 85. Findings include: The Progress Notes for Resident #40 documented the following: On 12/24/23 at 06:40 AM witnessed fall at 04:50 AM standing with her walker in front of the toilet due to resident's knees gave out. Assist with walker to her recliner. Family/Physician notification not done due to resident self aware. In an interview on 03/06/24 at 12:00 PM Staff E stated staff are advised to inform the physician and call the resident's family if the resident has had a fall, even if the fall was unwitnessed or if there was no injury. Only if the resident was their own guardian would they not be required to call. In an interview on 03/06/24 at 12:05 PM, the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON), stated she expected the resident's responsible party be notified after an incident involving a resident. These notes documented in the electronic health record (EHR) as well as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interviews, and facility policy review the facility failed to update the comprehensive care plans when a resident had a change in advanced directives for one of twenty-four residents reviewed (Residents #10). The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: The significant change minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10 had diagnoses that included respiratory failure and obstructive sleep apnea. The MDS indicated the resident had shortness of breath with exertion, at rest, and when lying flat. The MDS documented the resident on hospice and had a condition that may result in a life expectancy of less than 6 months. The Care Plan initiated [DATE] revealed the resident desired CPR (cardiopulmonary resuscitation) performed if he was found without a pulse. The Care Plan also revealed the resident on hospice services for end of life care. The Bio sheet dated [DATE] revealed Resident #10's code status as DNR (do not resuscitate). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 has diagnoses of frontal temporal neurocognitive disorder, PICK's disease (a form of dementia that affects behavior, personality, and speech), aphasia, and receiving hospice care. The Care Plan dated 2/19/24 revealed Resident #74 is nonverbal, staff must anticipate resident's needs, including the need to be fed meals. The resident had an unavoidable weight loss. Staff directives included to encourage oral fluids and supplements as ordered by the physician. Review of resident #74's physician orders indicated: 6/16/23 new order to start house supplement, 4 ounces three times daily 8/3/23 new order to increase house supplement to 6 ounces three times daily 8/28/23 new order to increase supplement to 8 ounces three times daily 10/2/23 new order to increase supplement to 8 ounces four times daily 11/3/23 new order for warm pack to right hand 5-10 minutes four times daily as needed for pain. These orders reviewed and processed per facilities triple check…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to assist a dependent resident with dining assistance when the resident demonstrated an inability to feed themselves for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for feeding assistance. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #74 had diagnoses of frontal temporal neurocognitive disorder, PICK's disease (a form of dementia that affects behavior, personality, and speech), and aphasia (trouble speaking). The MDS assessment indicated the resident on hospice and dependent for all cares. The Care Plan dated 2/19/24 revealed Resident #74 required assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living) and nonverbal. The staff directives included: anticipate the resident's needs including the need to be fed meals by staff, encourage oral fluids and nutrition as tolerated, and allow extra time for feeding. The Care Plan revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide proper supervision as it relates to a resident at risk for choking in 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident #40), and failed to ensure a resident's bed left in low position and the equipment in safe operating condition for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for falls (Resident #10). The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment of Resident #40 dated, 12/06/2023, identified a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 which indicated intact cognition. It noted the need for a mechanically altered diet, but contained no information regarding poor fitting dentures or a diagnosis of dysphagia. The Care Plan for Resident # 40 dated 12/08/2023 noted: 1. Difficulty chewing due to lack of dentition and poor fitting dentures. 2. A diagnosis of dysphagia related to a cerebrovascular event (stroke). 3. A need to be observed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the medication cart remained locked in a resident care area when not under staff supervision. The facility reported a census of 85 residents. Findings include: During an observation 3/05/24 at 2:25 PM, the medication cart in the central hallway next to the staff break room noted to be unlocked with staff not present. Further observations revealed the following: a. 2:25 PM Housekeeper cleaning the dining room floor across from the unlocked medication cart. b. 2:26 PM- a guest walked past the unlocked medication cart. c.2:28 PM- staff member walked into the break room, a housekeeper and guest walked past the unlocked medication cart, and a staff member exited the break room. d. 2:30 PM- 2 staff members exited the break room and walked past the unlocked medication cart. e. 2:31 PM- a guest walked past the unlocked medication cart. f. 2:32 PM- a resident in a wheelchair with a family member walked past the unlocked medication cart. g. 2:33 PM- 3 staff members walked past the unlocked medication cart.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interviews, resident interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly provide perineal cares for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6), failed to provide oral cares to 3 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #6, #11, #12), failed to provide dining assistance for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #9 ) and failed to provide toileting assistance for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. (Resident #5). The facility identified a census of 86 residents. Findings include: 1. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #6 had diagnoses that included aphasia, dementia, frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder and osteoarthritis. The assessment indicated the resident had severely impaired cognitive skills, fluctuating inattention and disorganized thinking, always incontinent of her bowels and bladder and required extensive assistance of two (2) staff with toilet use. An observation on 10/26/23 at time unknown revealed Staff A, Certified Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-07 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview and resident interview, the facility failed to assure resident belongings were returned to one (1) resident and/or family post discharge from the facility (Resident #3). The facility identified a census of 86 residents. Findings include: The Progress Notes for Resident #3 documented the following: On [DATE] at 9:55 p.m. the resident expired at 9:15 p.m., Hospice notifed. On [DATE] at 10:27 p.m. resident expired at 9:15 p.m. with family member present. Hospice notified and body carried to the funeral home. On [DATE] at 12:07 a.m. removed client medications from med cart, resident dentures and glasses sent with resident to funeral home. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:14 p.m. the Administrator confirmed the facility packed up Resident #3's belongings and there had been a missing teddy bear the family wanted placed into the resident's casket. During an interview on [DATE] at 1:25 p.m. Staff D, housekeeping confirmed there had also been fresh flowers…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and facility policy review the facility failed to provide the necessary assessments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with a skin condition and/or a condition change. (Resident #4) The facility identified a census of 86 residents. Findings include: A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment form dated 8/11/23 indicated Resident #4 had diagnoses that included septicemia, diabetes mellitus, infection in/on her right hip prosthesis post right hip replacement, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on her feet and difficulty walking. The assessment indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 out of 15 (moderately impaired cognitive skills), no behaviors or delirium, dependent on two (2) staff with ambulation in her room and required extensive assistance of 2 staff with bed mobility, transfers, toileting and one (1) staff assistance with personal hygiene. The assessment indicated the resident as at a fall risk and with 1 fall without injury since admission or reentry to the facility. A Care Plan with a Focus area initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| KILIAN, MARK | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/18/2001 |
| OSTHUS, DAVID | Individual | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/18/2001 |
| LTC ACCOUNTING SERVICES, LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2020 |
| POTTER AND BRANT PLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 08/01/2001 |
| PREMIER SENIOR MANAGEMENT LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/16/2025 |
| MARNIN, SCOTT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/08/2025 |
| OCONNER, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2021 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $654K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in IA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165441. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.