No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Accura Healthcare of Carlisle

680 Cole Street, Carlisle, IA 50047 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 80 certified beds · (515) 989-0871 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (515) 989-0871 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0606) — cited May 20262 actual-harm citations$37,177 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0606), cited May 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $37,177 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-31)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
7481 US-69 · (515) 953-1500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 School St · (515) 989-3261 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1115 Bluestem Dr · (515) 989-2083 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1005 S 5th St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
615 Highway 5 · (515) 989-3801

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased29.7%17.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight7.2%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.5%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%4.2%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.2%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%3.8%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.7%16.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication24.6%20.8%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine88.2%95.3%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.0%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control30.9%25.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table30.5%19.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication7.7%2.1%1.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.721.491.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.752.081.80typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.03U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.01hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.03 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 1% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.1–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — Newly certified nursing home with less than 12-15 months of data available or the nursing home opened less than 6 months ago, and there were no data to submit or claims for this measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.551.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.47
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.17
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.11
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.41
RN hoursweekends
52.1%
Total nursing turnover
45.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 75.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.47 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.17 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.49 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-21)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-07-31)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to perform proper transfer method as outlined in the Care Plan which contributed to a femur fracture which resulted in the need for surgical intervention for 1 of 4 residents reviewed for transfers (Resident #45). The facility reported a census of 70. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 6/12/25 revealed Resident #45 with a Brief Interview Mental Status score of 14, which indicated intact cognition. Diagnoses listed on the MDS include paraplegia, anxiety disorder, diabetes, and orthostatic hypotension (low blood pressure). The MDS noted the presence of a urinary catheter and a colostomy. Resident #45 is dependent on staff for chair/bed-to-chair transfers, toilet transfers, and tub/shower transfers. The Care Plan with initiated date of 6/20/24 identified Resident #45 with an Activities of Daily Living self-care performance deficit related to paraplegia, limited mobility, limited range of motion (ROM), and pain. Interventions include the use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, policy review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to prevent the development and worsening of a facility acquired pressure ulcer for 3 of 3 residents reviewed with pressure ulcers(Residents #1, #3, and #4). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: The MDS (Minimum Data Set) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is an intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain a safe and clean environment throughout the facility's 3 of 3 carpeted hallways (100, 200, and 300 halls), and 1 of 1 residents reported issues of the dirty tiled floor in their rooms and broken sink (Resident #35). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1.On 5/19/26 at 7:06 AM, a walkthrough of the facility revealed items stored on both sides of the 200 hallway. Two shower chairs sat on the left side when walking down from the dining room, and multiple wheelchairs, garbage cans, and resident transfer devices (lifts) lined the right side. On 5/20/26 at 12:01 PM, an observation of the 200 hallway revealed discoloration continued throughout the entire length of the carpeted flooring. On 5/21/26 at 12:39 PM, an interview and observation with the facility's Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) revealed she worked at the facility in her role since 2007, cleaned the 200 hallway carpet flooring every Tuesday, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical document review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to provide food at an appetizing temperature to 1 of 8 residents (Residents #41) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 78 residents.Findings include: Review of Resident #41's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognitive functioning. Interview 5/18/2026 at 10:25 AM with Resident #41 revealed that she eats in her room, and the food is often cold when brought to her. Observation 5/19/26 at 12:03 PM a sample tray was obtained with food temperatures for the creamy pork chop measuring 122.7 degrees, and the broccoli measuring 132.3 degrees. The facility policy Food Temperatures, dated 2021, stated hot food items should not fall below 135 degrees Fahrenheit after cooking. On 5/19/26 at 12:37 p.m., the Certified Dietary Manager(CDM) stated he expected hot foods held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or above.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to prepare food under sanitary conditions for 2 of 2 kitchen observations. The facility reported a census of 78 residents.Findings included: 1. Observations during the initial kitchen tour on 5/17/26 at 10:38 a.m. revealed the following concerns:A. A thick debris and dust layer on the floor under the shelves containing cans and dry goods in the pantry. B. A thick black dust layer covering the ceiling vent above and diagonal to the clean side of the dish machine room.C. A thick crusty-looking white buildup on the outside of the dishwasher.D. Dust particles hung down on 2 spigots of the fire suppression system located above the stove burners.E. Heavy dust buildup on the wall slats behind the stove burners.F. Orange splatters between the bottom of the stove and the stove door.G. Heavy dust buildup on a shelf with multiple steam table pans sitting face down. H. Multiple pudding-like splatters on the right side floor of the Arctic Air #2 refrigerator.I Clear plastic bowls sat face down in crumbs on a red…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-21 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — pattern
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interviews the facility failed to complete and/or maintain documentation of routine bed rail inspections for 10 of 10 residents with side rails. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include:A record review of Resident #32's current care plan revealed the resident used a side rail (bilateral half rails) to aid in repositioning and safety due to frequent falls out of bed. The goal, initiated on 6/27/25, directed that Resident #32 will remain free of falls out of bed and will assist with repositioning through the review date. A care plan intervention, initiated on 6/27/25, instructed staff to assist in resident independence with repositioning. On 5/20/26 at 9:48 AM, an observation and interview with the facility Administrator of bed rails revealed a resident had both upper quarter-length rails. The Administrator informed that the Housekeeping and Laundry Supervisor (HLS) currently oversees maintenance due to a recent staff changeover in that department.On 5/20/26 at 11:52 AM, an observation and interview with the Maintenance Director…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0606 — failed to not employ staff found guilty of abuse — isolated
    Not hire anyone with a finding of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on employee personnel record review, staff interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough background check had been completed before hire prior to working with dependent adults for 1 of 3 staff personnel files reviewed. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: On 5/18/26 at 1:06 PM, the Administrator reported in an email that Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had a start date of 9/9/25. Review of the Iowa Criminal History Record Check Request SING form dated 9/3/25 revealed Staff A had a history of criminal convictions. The SING form did not contain further research documentation to confirm whether or not Staff A could work at the facility. Review of facility policy updated 10/19/22 and titled, Nursing Facility Abuse Prevention, Identification, Investigation and Reporting Policy, the facility will conduct an Iowa criminal record check and dependent adult/child abuse registry check on all prospective employees and other individuals engaged to provide services to residents, prior to hire, in the manner prescribed under 481…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse allegations(Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 78 residents.Findings included: 1. A 5/14/26 Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) Evaluation listed Resident #83's score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 5/17/26 at 11:54 a.m., Resident #83 stated last night(5/16/26) staff yelled at her roommate(Resident #34). Resident #83 stated 3 staff assisted the resident on the toilet and they yelled at the resident. She stated she couldn't tell exactly what they said but stated they said if Resident #34 didn't do something, they would leave her on the toilet. Resident #83 stated she didn't know why they were so irritated but they were angry with Resident#34. She stated this was around 9:00 p.m. Resident #83 stated she informed Staff B Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA) about this this morning(5/17/26).2. The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/30/26, listed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff and resident interviews, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse in a timely manner for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for abuse allegations(Resident #34). The facility reported a census of 78 residents.Findings included: 1. A 5/14/26 Brief Interview for Mental Status(BIMS) Evaluation listed Resident #83's score as 15 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. On 5/17/26 at 11:54 a.m., Resident #83 stated last night(5/16/26) staff yelled at her roommate(Resident #34). Resident #83 stated 3 staff assisted the resident on the toilet and they yelled at the resident. She stated she couldn't tell exactly what they said but stated they said if Resident #34 didn't do something, they would leave her on the toilet. Resident #83 stated she didn't know why they were so irritated but they were angry with her. She stated this was around 9:00 p.m. Resident #83 stated she informed Staff B Certified Nursing Assistant(CNA) about this this morning(5/17/26).2. The Minimum Data Set(MDS) assessment tool, dated 4/20/26, listed diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Record (EHR) review, document review, policy review, and staff interview the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation of the resident's stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and reconciliation of all pre- and post-discharge medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #82). The facility reported a census of 78 residents.Findings include:Review of Resident #82's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 2/20/26.Review of Resident #82's EHR page titled, Progress Notes indicated on 2/17/26 that Resident #82 was expressing a want to move to another facility. Further review of the Progress Notes revealed an entry 2/20/26 indicating transportation was at the facility to take Resident #82 to a new facility. Review of Resident #82's EHR page titled, Clinical Assessment revealed a discharge planning review assessment that had not been completed as of 5/19/26.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews the facility failed to complete 1 of 4 residents discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments when they discharged home from the facility (Resident #50). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. 1.Review of Resident #50 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Census revealed she was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 12/20/25. Review of Resident #50 Communication With family Note dated 12/17/25 at 11:30 AM documented she will discharge home on [DATE]. Review of Resident #50 Discharge Summary Note dated 12/20/25 at 10:41 AM documented she discharged from the facility on 12/20/25 at 8:30 AM. Review of Resident #50 EHR MDS log on 5/19/26 revealed the facility has completed an Entry MDS on 12/5/25 and admission MDS on 12/11/25, but has not completed a discharge MDS when she discharged on 12/20/25. On 5/20/26 at 11:59 AM, an interview with the facility Administrator and Nurse Consultant revealed staff follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure all mental health diagnoses were on 1 of 3 residents' Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) documents for (Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of a Resident #8 Medical Diagnoses in her Electronic Health Record (EHR) documented she received the diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD; a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event) on 6/8/2021. A record review of Resident #8's current PASRR dated 6/10/2025 lacked her diagnosis of PTSD. On 3/27/26, a record review of a visit titled Modified Progress Note documented Resident #8 was changing from weekly to biweekly visits for the next 3 months, and mental health professionals continued to see her for her diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder PTSD and major depression (persistent and severe sadness). On 5/20/26 at 12:19 PM, an electronic mail (email) from the facility Administrator informed that staff follow the regulations for PASRR documents. On 5/20/26 at 12:45 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 34 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included problems, goals, or interventions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for a resident with diuretic medication usage. The facility reported a census of 78. Findings include:Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #2 utilized diuretic medications during the 7 day look back period. The MDS documented that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE].Review of Resident #2's Electronic Healthcare Record (EHR) page titled, Clinical Physician Orders revealed an order for Lasix (Diuretic medication) 40mg oral tablet to give 1 tablet twice a day with a start date of 8/26/25. Review of Resident #2's Care Plan with a revision date of 4/13/26 revealed no focus, goals, or interventions for diuretic use. Interview 5/20/26 at 12:42 PM with the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator revealed that Lasix should be in the care plan. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to to provide the necessary care and services to ensure a resident received appropriate clinical monitoring, timely medical provider notification, and consistent administration of prescribed treatments for a Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for UTI (Resident #31). Specifically, facility staff failed to conduct nursing assessments across two separate antibiotic regimens, delayed follow-up with an unresponsive medical provider regarding a recurrence of symptoms, omitted a scheduled antibiotic dose without clinical justification, and failed to update the resident's care plan to reflect a suspected multidrug-resistant infection and use of antibitoics. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: A review of all Progress Notes and clinical records from 4/1/26 to 5/20/26 established a timeline of Resident #31's antibiotic therapies for a urinary tract infection (UTI), which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-21 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, resident and staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to ensure that an effective pain management regimen was consistently implemented in accordance with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive plan of care for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for pain management (Resident #64). Specifically, the facility failed to administer prescribed pain medication as ordered, resulting in a failure to meet the resident's goals for care and preferences. The facility reported a census of 78 residents. Findings include: Resident #64's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13, indicating intact cognition. The MDS revealed staff admitted him to the facility on 4/21/26. The MDS revealed he uses a wheelchair, does not walk, and depends on staff for transfers. The MDS documented diagnoses of peripheral vascular disease (a circulatory condition where narrowed blood vessels reduce blood flow to the limbs), arthritis (joint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, observation, document review and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility was free from any infestation of any kind of vermin in the facility. The facility reported a census of 72 residents. Finding include:In an interview with Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on 1/26/26 at 3:00 pm, she revealed there was a mice problem at the facility and in the staff break room. She further stated mice ate her snack that was in her personal locker inside the breakroom. This occurred about a week ago and the facility added mice traps and boxes at that time and the exterminator came out to the facility. The facility provided a document titled Work Orders for dates December 29, 2025 - January 29, 2026 and an entry log mouse in room [ROOM NUMBER] was documented as closed work order.During an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 1/27/26 at 9:00 am, the 6-drawer clothing dresser revealed mice droppings in 4 out of 6 drawers. Drawers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, electronic health record review (EHR), staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to report a resident's allegation of sexual abuse (Resident #4) to the State Agency within the required timeframe for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for abuse and dignity. The facility reported a census of 72. Findings include: The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment completed on 12/4/25 revealed Resident #4 with a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented that Resident #4 was dependent on staff for completion of personal cares and transfers and wheelchair use. The Incident Investigative Report showed the facility submitted on online report of sexual abuse involving Resident #4 on 1/22/26 at 8:13 AM to the Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals, and Licensing. During an interview on 1/26/26 at 1:55 PM, Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated Resident #4 reported the morning of 1/22/26 that the guy from last night needs to be fired as he raped me. Staff F, CNA, who was also present when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on facility document review, staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed protect residents from further potential abuse once an allegation of sexual abuse was reported to staff, for 1 of 2 abuse allegations reviewed. An employee meeting the general description of the alleged perpetrator worked and had access to residents after the allegation was were made. The facility reported a census of 72. Findings include: During an interview on 1/28/26 at 10:00 AM, Staff H, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), explained Resident #4 reported to them on the morning of 1/21/26 that a black man raped me and the black girl when they asked the resident how they slept during the night. Resident #4 said this man was the one who comes in and turns the light on. After completing personal cares, Staff H stated they went to inform Staff I, Registered Nurse (RN), of the statements Resident #4 had made. During an interview on 1/28/26 at 2:00 PM, Staff I, RN acknowledged Staff H, CNA approached them the morning of 1/21/26 to report Resident #4's rape allegation. Staff I explained she then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-07-31 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual the facility failed to accurately complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for four of twenty-three residents reviewed (Residents #1, #3, #6 and #32). The facility reported a census of 70 residents. Findings include: 1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #3 had a diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The MDS documented the resident took an anticoagulant. The Electronic Health Record (EHR)revealed that Resident #3 had diagnoses of Aortocoronary bypass graft (heart arteries blocked or narrowed) and old myocardial infarction (heart attack). The Care Plan revised 4/12/24 revealed Resident #3 had a risk of abnormal bleeding related to routine use of hematological agents (drugs used to treat disorders of the blood). The Care Plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered and monitor for side effects. The EHR revealed Clopidogrel Bisulfate (Plavix) (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan that included focus, goals, or interventions for 2 out 5 residents reviewed (Resident #5, #23). The facility reported a census of 70 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented an admission date to the facility of 9/5/13. The MDS also documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The MDS listed a diagnosis of Non-Alzheimer's dementia. Review of Resident #5's Electronic Health Record (EHR) document titled Care Plan last review completed date of 6/27/25 revealed no documentation of dementia diagnosis with a focus area, goals, or interventions. 2. Review of Resident #23's Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented an admission date to the facility of 6/8/23. The MDS listed active diagnoses of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (last 30 days). Review of Resident #23's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff appropriately completed a resident assessment and provide timely intervention for two residents. One resident with Lower Extremity (LE) wraps for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for edema (Resident #55) and one resident with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for oxygen (Resident #62). The facility reported a census of 70.Findings include:1. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for resident #55, dated 7/24/25, indicated diagnoses of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and cerebral vascular accident.The Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated that resident additional diagnoses of chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, localized edema and lymphedema.The EHR indicated and an active order from the primary physician for Lymphedema wraps to be worn 24 hours a day/seven days a week (24/7) and therapy to change starting 4/7/2025. The EHR also indicated that this order was discontinued 7/31/25 with a new order for compression stocking on in the morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff secured and placed a resident's catheter bag below the level of the bladder to minimize the risk of cross-contamination and the risk of acquiring a urinary tract infection for one of two residents observed with a catheter (Residents #1). The facility reported a census of 70 residents.Findings include: The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had diagnoses of renal (kidney) insufficiency, obstructive uropathy (obstructed urine flow), and diabetes. The MDS indicated the resident had an indwelling catheter. The Care Plan revised 5/21/25 revealed Resident #1 had a suprapubic catheter and at risk for a MDRO (multi-drug resistant organism). The Care Plan directed staff to position the catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder. Observations revealed the following: a. On 7/28/25 at 11:30 AM, Resident #1 sat in a wheelchair with a catheter bag lying on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interview, manufacturer's instructions, and competency review the facility failed to administer insulin according to the physician's orders and per manufacturer instructions to ensure the proper amount of insulin administered for one of two residents observed who received insulin during medication pass (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 70 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #1 had diagnosis of diabetes and diabetic neuropathy (nerve damage caused by diabetes, often affecting the legs and feet due to high blood sugar level). The MDS documented the resident took insulin 7 of 7 days during the look-back period.The Care Plan initiated 5/3/24 revealed Resident #1 at risk for altered blood glucose levels related to diabetes and took insulin. The Care Plan directed staff to administer medications as ordered. The Medication Administration Record for Resident # 1 listed Novolog insulin flexpen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Report (January 1st to March 31st) review, facility staffing reports review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit accurate staff reports for the PBJ Staffing Data Report. The facility reported a census of 70 residents.Findings include:The PBJ Staffing Data Report run date of 724/25 triggered for excessively low weekend staffing for the fiscal year 2nd quarter, January 1st to March 31st, 2025. In an interview with the Administrator on 7/30/25 at 8:30 am she stated the facility was not understaffed on weekends and the PBJ data submission did not include staffing agency staff that worked on weekends. The Regional Director on 7/31/25 at 1:15 pm submitted a PBJ report via email displaying the report showed no concerns. He was advised to call the help line to correct the issue with the CMS's PBJ reporting excessively low weekend staffing for the fiscal year 2nd quarter.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure staff properly disinfected resident care devices such as a glucometer machine and a stethoscope after resident use for 1 of 2 residents observed for a blood sugar check (Resident #40) and 1 of 2 residents observed for a gastrostomy (g-tube) tube (Resident #7). The facility staff also failed to follow infection control practices in order to prevent and control the onset and spread of infection within the facility by not removing soiled gloves for 1 of 2 units. The facility reported a census of 70 residents.Findings include:1.The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #7 had diagnoses of pneumonia. The MDS indicated the resident took an antibiotic. The Care Plan revised 2/19/25 revealed the resident had a tube feeding related to swallowing problem and at risk for MDRO related to an indwelling PEG (gastrostomy) (a tube in the stomach) tube. The Care Plan directed staff to use enhanced…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal cares of oral hygiene for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (#11). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 1:42 PM, Resident #11 was observed reclined in a Geri chair (large, padded chair for individuals with limited mobility) in the television area. He was breathing through his mouth and his lips were noted to be chapped and peeling. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #11 dated 2/03/25 indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 04 out of 15 which indicated severely impaired cognition. It included diagnoses of anemia, seizure disorder, quadriplegia, a Cerebral Vascular Accident (CVA - stroke), and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. It also indicated the resident was dependent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The MDS documented that the Resident had a feeding tube for nutitional approaches for both total calories, and fluid intake. The Electronic Health Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (#4 & #11). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment identifies the definition of pressure ulcers: Stage I is intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have a visible blanching; in dark skin tones only, it may appear with persistent blue or purple hues. Stage II is partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough (dead tissue, usually cream or yellow in color). May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister. Stage III is full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone, tendon, or muscle is not exposed. Slough may be present but does not obscure the depth of tissue loss. May include undermining and tunneling. Stage IV is full thickness tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to use ordered Durable Medical Equipment (DME) to prevent a further decrease in Range-of-Motion (ROM) for 2 of 3 residents reviewed. (provide treatment and services to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (#4 & #11). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: 1. On 3/31/25 at 1:42 PM, Resident #11 was observed in a Geri chair (large, padded chair for individuals with limited mobility) in the television area without any DME. His hands were noted to be limited in range-of-motion. At 1:58 PM, a review of his Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed a physician's order dated 3/01/25 for resident to wear palm [NAME] (DME used to prevent contractures <shortened or tightened muscle, tendon, or joint that causes limited movement> and protect skin for people with limited ROM) at all times. [NAME] may be removed if resident complains of (c/o) pain. May remove for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to don appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when providing direct resident care for 2 of 2 residents who were on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) (#11 & #15). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: 1. On 4/01/25 at 7:28 AM, Staff D, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA), Staff E, CNA, and Staff G, CNA entered Resident #15's room without any PPE. An Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign was observed attached to the resident's door in both English and Spanish. The sign indicated staff were to wear gloves and a gown for the following activities: a) Dressing b) bathing/showering c) transferring d) changing linens e) providing hygiene f) changing briefs or assisting with toileting g) device care use: central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, tracheostomy h) wound care: any skin opening requiring a dressing The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents with dignity and respect for 3 of 7 residents reviewed for resident rights (Resident #2, #7 and Resident #8). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings include: 1. The Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 12/29/24, listed diagnoses for Resident #2 which included paraplegia (paralysis in the lower portion of the body), anxiety, and depression, and stated the resident was dependent on staff for bathing. The MDS listed her Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score as 15 out of 15, which indicated intact cognition. A Care Plan entry, dated 12/2/24, stated the resident had a history of a traumatic life event and directed staff to provide a calming environment through country music, pet visits, and TV. An untitled, undated facility investigation stated on 2/16/25, Resident #2 reported that Staff C Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) accidentally hurt her arm by lifting it too high to wash under her arms and Staff C called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, policy review, and staff interview, the facility failed to carry out a medication intervention for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for a change in condition (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 75 residents. Findings includes: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment tool, dated 1/6/25, listed diagnoses for Resident #1 which included hemiplegia (one-sided weakness), diabetes, and anxiety. The MDS listed her cognition as severely impaired. The facility policy Medications Ordering and Receiving from Pharmacy, revised January 2018, did not address how staff should obtain medications needed for new orders. A 4/15/24 Care Plan entry directed staff to administer psychotropic medications as ordered by the physician. The February 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) listed a 2/21/25 6:00 p.m. order for lorazepam(a medication used for anxiety) 2 milligrams (mg)/milliliter (ml) oral concentrate, give 0.25 ml every 6 hours for anxiety/agitation. The 6:00 p.m. dose on 2/21/25 and the 12:00 a.m. dose on 2/22/25 lacked checks to indicate staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to properly secure medications from unauthorized access for one of one medication cart observed. The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: On 1/13/25 at 3:31 PM, an observation revealed an unattended, unlocked medication cart in a resident hall. There were no staff members present. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), exited a resident's room and came to the medication cart. She locked the medication cart and stated the medication cart should not have been unlocked. A policy titled Medication Storage in the Facility revised 11/2018 indicated medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with authorized access. On 1/15/25 at 9:33 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) stated staff should ensure the medication cart is locked if they are leaving the cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and staff interviews, the facility failed to properly protect resident information from unauthorized access for one of one laptop reviewed. The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: On 1/13/25 at 3:31 PM, an observation revealed an opened laptop with Resident #11's Electronic Health Record (EHR) viewable. There were no staff members present. Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), exited a resident's room and came to the medication cart. She exited the resident's EHR and accessed a screen that displayed 16 residents' EHR information. At 3:33 PM, Resident #10 activated her call light and called out for help. Staff A walked into the resident's room. The laptop was observed opened with 16 residents' EHR information viewable. At 3:37 PM, Staff A returned to the medication cart and stated the EHR information should not be unlocked. On 1/14/25 at 6:48 AM, an observation revealed an opened laptop with Resident #2's EHR viewable. Another staff member locked the drawer. On 1/15/25 at 7:51 AM, the Administrator emailed the facility didn't have a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to implement infection control policies to prevent cross-contamination. The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include: 1. On 1/13/25 at 1:21 pm, Staff D, Housekeeping Aide (HA) and Staff E, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) stated purple-top sanitizing wipes (saniwipes) were used to clean Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) goggles for use in Covid+ resident rooms but were not able to locate the wipes. At 1:25 pm, the PPE bin at the north end of hall 200 contained only goggles for eye protection but did not contain any saniwipes for shared equipment. At 1:45 pm, Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) stated PPE goggles are for individual residents but for multiple staff. He also stated the goggles get cleaned with saniwipes after use. At 1:45 pm, Staff E, CNA and Staff G, CNA used an EZ Stand (mechanical device used for standing assistance) to transfer Resident #2. There were no saniwipes available to clean the EZ Stand. At 1:53…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident observations, record review, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to treat residents with dignity by failing to provide an alternate method of obtaining toileting assistance which resulted in the resident walking to the unit hallway intersection and yelling for help to be changed. Dignity was reviewed for eleven residents, concerns were found for Resident#8. The facility reported a census of 73. Findings include: On 1/14/25 at 7:16 AM, an Environmental Services (EVS) staff member was observed leaving the south hall of the Chronic Confusion Dementing Illness (CCDI) unit. At 7:22 AM, Resident #8 walked to her room doorway and asked to be changed. The resident was instructed to follow her normal method of contacting staff for assistance as the surveyor was not authorized to help. At 7:26 AM, the resident ambulated with her walker to the south hall main corridor intersection and yelled down the hall for someone to change her. At 7:30 AM, another EVS staff member entered the south hall and got the wet floor sign. At 7:32 AM, Staff B, Certified Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-28 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on document review, and staff interview the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was in the facility for eight (8) consecutive hours for 9 of 32 days reviewed (July 28th through August 28th 2024). The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: Review of untitled documents of the facility's daily staffing schedule provided by the facility revealed there was no RN coverage 7/30/24, 7/31/24, 8/5/24, 8/12/24, 8/14/24, and 8/15/24. These documents further revealed there was only 4 hours of RN coverage 8/19/24, 8/20/24, and 8/21/24. During an interview 8/28/24 at 9:02 AM with Staff A Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) revealed that the facility did not have 8 hour RN coverage every day. Staff A further revealed they cannot count management towards the 8 hours RN coverage, and that the facility did not have enough RN coverage for the schedule. During an interview 8/28/24 at 9:06 AM with the Administrator revealed that the facility did not have 8 hour RN coverage for the days reviewed. The administrator further revealed that the facility does not have a policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-28 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Electronic Health Records (EHR), resident interview, resident council documentation, and observations the facility failed to provide nursing staff to assure residents safety by not responding to call lights in a timely manner for 4 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #2, #35, #38, and #41). The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #35 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 which indicated no cognitive impairment. The MDS documented the resident required partial/moderate assistance with toileting hygiene. On 8/25/24 at 2:04 PM Resident #35 stated it takes a while for staff to answer her call light. Resident #35 stated she had turned the call light on while in the bathroom and had to wait for longer than a half an hour. Resident #35 stated at that time she just did the best she could and completed the peri care herself and transferred herself back to the wheelchair. 2. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, Staff interview, and infection control policy the facility failed to use universal infection control measures and Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) during cares for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for infection control (Residents # 2, and #7). The facility further failed to properly wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) while caring for 2 of 2 Residents reviewed with a positive Covid diagnosis. (Resident #49 and #60) The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of paraplegia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Review of Resident#2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) document titled, Physician's orders, revealed a physician order dated 5/29/24 documenting EBP every day and night shift related to risk for Multi-Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO). Resident#2's Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on document review, observations, resident interview, and staff interview the facility failed to provide dignity by leaving a catheter bag uncovered for 1 of 8 residents reviewed (Resident #2). The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further revealed diagnosis of paraplegia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Observation 8/25/24 at 1:42 PM Resident #2's Catheter bag was noted to not have a privacy cover. Interview 8/25/24 at 1:42 PM Resident #2 revealed the facility never puts a cover on the drainage bag. During a follow up observation 8/26/24 at 2:07 PM Resident #2's catheter bag was observed with no dignity cover. During a follow up interview 8/26/24 at 2:10 PM Resident #2 revealed that the urinary drainage bag had a cover, but it went missing a long time ago. Resident #2 further revealed the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on Medication Administration Record (MAR)- Treatment Administration Record (TAR), resident interview and staff interviews the facility failed to represent an accurate assessment of the resident's status during the observation period of the MDS by not accurately assessing need for restrains and utilization of catheter for 2 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #2 and #38). The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #38 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 15 indicating no cognitive impairment. On 8/26/24 at 8:11 AM Resident #38 stated he had not had a catheter in about 2 years and had not had a catheter at this facility. Review of Resident #38's MDS dated [DATE] documented indwelling catheter present. Review of Resident #38's MAR-TAR documented no physician's order for catheter. Review of Resident #38's care plan documented no care plan for indwelling catheter. On 8/27/24 at 4:59 PM the DON stated Resident #38…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-28 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on electronic record review (EHR), staff interviews, and policy review the facility failed to implement a comprehensive care plan when staff left a resident that had a care plan of supervision with meals unsupervised during meals for 1 of 5 residents reviewed (Resident #60). The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Finding include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for Resident #60 documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 9 which indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #60's Care Plans documented an intervention that Resident #60 could eat independently in the dining room with supervision, after setup. Observation on 8/25/24 at 1:30 PM of Staff G, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) delivered Resident #60's lunch tray into her room, opened the styrofoam tray, removed plastic wrap from drinks, and handed Resident #60 utensils. Staff G left the room and closed Resident #60's door. Resident #60 began to eat her pie. On 8/26/24 at 1:45 PM Staff F, CNA stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to implement policies and procedures regarding the technical aspect of feeding tubes by not verifying gastrostomy tube (feeding tube) is functioning properly before beginning a feeding for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #7) reviewed. The facility reported a census of 71 residents. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed diagnosis of traumatic brain dysfunction, pneumonia, malnutrition, and artificial openings of the gastrointestinal tract. Review of Resident #7's Electronic Health Record (EHR) page titled, Physician's Orders, revealed a physician order dated 1/30/24 documenting to check placement and residual prior to administering medications via Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube. Observation 8/27/24 at 12:24 PM Staff C Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) proceeded to access Resident #7's PEG tube to administer medications. Staff C then administered a flush and medications without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-08 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, staff interview, resident interview, review of Steamtable Temperature logs, review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes and facility policy review the facility failed to maintain hot food served at a temperature greater than 140 degrees during a meal service. The facility identified a census of 65 Findings include: An observation and interview on 5.2.24 at 12:58 p.m. revealed Staff A, [NAME] as she tempted the food at the immediate end of the food service with the results as follows: a. Taco casserole - 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F) b. [NAME] - 137 F c. Mashed potatoes - 120 F. As the staff member took this temp she confirmed the temperature as low because there had been no room on steam table so she positioned the serving pan on top of the table and not around the heating elements. d. Chicken strips - 164 e. Hamburger patty - 151 Staff A reported she had been required to maintain food temps at 140 to 165 degrees F for hot food. Review of the facilities Steamtable Temperatures logs revealed the facility staff failed to check the food temperatures for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, staff interview, resident interview, a volunteer ombudsman interview, review of the facilities Employer Handbook and review of the facilities Residents' [NAME] of Rights the facility failed to treat 1 of 3 residents with dignity and respect while preserving her rights. (Resident #1) The facility identified a census of 65 residents, Findings include: During an interview 5.2.24 at approximately. 3:30 p.m. the facilities Volunteer Ombudsman voiced a concern related to the facilities refusal to allow Resident #1 to have vaped an electronic nicotine device because the facility had allegedly being a non-smoking facility minus 2 residents that were grandfathered in at the time of the policy change. The Ombudsman confirmed staff as able to have smoked. The Ombudsman indicated not to long ago (a few weeks) he drove by the facility around 7:30 p.m. and observed several staff smoking in the designated resident smoking area to the South side of the building. An observation at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, clinical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes the facility failed to follow physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed with an acute and chronic illness. (Resident #4) The facility identified a census of 65 residents. Findings include: 1. A Medication Administration Record (MAR) form dated 5.1.24 thru 5.31.24 for Resident #4 directed the facility staff to have administered Lispro insulin (short acting insulin) 3 units subcutaneously (SQ) with meals and to hold if blood sugars registered less than 90 related to Diabetes Mellitus (DM) due to an underlying condition with hyperglycemia. That order had been in addition to a sliding scale of Lispro insulin. (started 3.25.24 at 6 p.m.) The resident's Lispro sliding scale went as follows with a Physician's directive to have been administered with meals. (started 3.20.24 at 6 p.m.) A blood sugar of 0-150 = no units of Lispro insulin 151-200 = 2 units. 201-250 = 4 251-300 = 6 301-350 = 8 351-400 = 10 An observation 5.3.24 at 9:14 a.m. revealed Staff H,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to properly destroy Resident #6's narcotic (pain) medication when the resident was discharge to the hospital on 6/11/2023, and then passed away while at the hospital. The facility identified a census of 67 residents. Findings include: 1. Resident #6' s Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], documented an admission date of 12/24/2020 and revealed memory problems with moderately impaired decision making abilities and an opiod (pain medication) was used in the last 7 days of the look back period. Resident was discharged to hospital on 6/11/2023 with return anticipated. Diagnosis include Diabetes Mellitus, Anxiety and Pain. A Physician Order Sheet signed and dated by the Physician on 4/7/2023, documented Tramadol HCL tablet 50 milligrams, give 1 tablet by mouth every 12 hours for pain. A documented titled Controlled Drug/Receipt/Record/Disposition Form dated 5/30/23, identified that 30 Tramadol HCL tablets were delivered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$37,177 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $37,177 — penalty dated 2025-07-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-0.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$29K
Related-party expense0% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 1%Other / private 21%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $29K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$266per resident / day
operating cost
$8,089per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$266per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Iowa Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Iowa
$9,277/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,038/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,381/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 165255. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-21, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next