St Anthony Senior Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 45.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 2% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 0% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 79 beds and averages 73.8 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.73 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.69 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.99 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record review, resident and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to protect residents from possible accidents and injuries. An electric space heater was used to provide supplemental heat to 3 rooms without out monitoring or supervision. Two rooms were in the Memory Care Unit with residents who had Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) scores of 3 and 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. One resident was ambulatory and at risk for unsafe wandering per their Care Plan. Space heaters were provided on the weekend of 1/13/24 and removed 1/22/24 for 4 of 74 residents reviewed (Resident #1, #20, #30, and #173). The facility staff also failed to attach a lift sling to a mechanical lift correctly when transferring a resident, resulting in a fall with injury to 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #29). These failures resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) of the safety and welfare for the residents. The State Agency informed the facility the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2026-04-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, clinical record review, facility investigative file review, staff interviews and facility policy review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a facility staff member for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1). The facility reported a census of 73 residents. Findings include:According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 3/17/2026, Resident #1 scored 0 on the Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). A score of 0 suggested severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented he had impairments to his bilateral upper and lower extremities and utilized a wheelchair. Resident #1 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, upper and lower body dressing, mobility, and toileting transfers. The MDS documented he was not on a toileting program, was frequently incontinent of urine and always continent of stool. The MDS documented Resident #1 received an antipsychotic during the review period. The following diagnoses were listed for Resident #1: Alzheimer's disease, heart failure, stroke, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-10-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record reviews, hospital record review, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate nursing supervision to prevent accident and injuries for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #1) for falls. The facility failed to implement effective interventions and follow the care plan to prevent falls. Resident #1 was at risk for falls and had a history of repeated falls with trends. Resident #1 had eight falls from January 2025 to August 2025. On 6/1/25 Resident #1 had a fall in her room after attempting to self transfer from her wheelchair to her recliner, resulting in her hitting her head and sustaining a laceration to her forehead requiring an emergency room (ER) visit and 8 staples. On 8/8/25 she fell again in her room after attempting to self transfer from wheelchair to her recliner, resulting in her hitting her head and left hip pain. Resident #1 was transferred to the hospital for x-rays and revealed she had a left hip fracture which required surgical intervention.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to submit a Level 2 Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident #12). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented Resident #12 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 03 indicating severely impaired cognition. The MDS revealed Resident #12 had diagnoses of Non-Alzheimer's dementia, depression, and psychotic disorder. The Care Plan with a target date of 7/2/26 revealed Resident #12 took an antipsychotic medication for treatment and management of symptoms of delusional disorder, insomnia and depression. The Clinical record revealed a diagnosis of delusional disorders with an effective date of 9/27/23. A Physician Order dated 4/3/25 directed staff to administer Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) 25 MG (milligrams) one tablet at bed time related to dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, clinical record review, and staff interviews, the facility failed to accurately transcribe written physician orders for psychotropic medications with correct medication end dates into the electronic medical record for 2 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #5 and #62). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.Findings include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] for Resident #5 documented diagnoses of dementia, stroke and heart failure. The MDS showed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3, which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Care Plan with an initiated date of 8/12/25 showed Resident #5 used psychotropic medications to aid with the treatment of the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment with behaviors including, restlessness, agitation, inappropriate towards female staff. The written Physician Order dated 1/27/25 for Resident #5 showed Lorazepam 2 milligram (mg)/milliter (ml) give 0.25 ml per mouth every 4 hours as needed for 3 months. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to follow proper infection control practices during catheter care to prevent urinary tract infections and skin infection for 1 of 2 residents observed (Resident #5). The facility reported a census of 75 residents.Finding include:Observation on 2/11/26 at 1:50 PM identified Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), performed hand hygiene and donned personal protective equipment (PPE). Staff A assisted the resident to lower pants and sit on the toilet, gathered supplies, placed two washcloths in the sink, and allowed the sink to fill with water. Staff A removed a washcloth from the sink, folded it into fourths, and provided perineal care to the resident's penis. Observation revealed areas of irritated, reddened skin. Staff A then used the same washcloth to cleanse the tubing of the resident's urinary catheter. After completion of care, when asked if any part of the care should have been performed differently, Staff A responded no, and reported the state had not observed her for several years.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and policy review, the facility failed to ensure open items were dated, covered and labeled. The facility further failed to ensure staff used proper hand hygiene practices during lunch service while serving food. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: 1. Observation 1/21/25 at 10:00 AM in the main kitchen with Staff I, Food and Service Director, present revealed the following: a. Two open undated bags of pasta b. Open undated bag of graham cracker crumbs During an interview 1/21/25 at 10:20 AM, Staff I stated an expectation the food is dated, labeled and sealed after it is opened. Staff I stated an intention to label and date these food items and return them to the pantry. Review of the facility Food Storage Guidelines policy, with a revision date of 12/24, documented food not served in the service of a meal will be handled safely to prevent contamination or spoilage. Unused foods are identified, labeled and dated. 2. During an observation 1/21/25, beginning at 11:30 AM, Staff J, kitchen staff, served residents lunch,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews, observation and facility policy review the facility failed to verify the resident's advanced directive choice documented accurately for 1 (Resident #58) of 24 residents reviewed. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: The Resident Dashboard for Resident #58, dated [DATE], documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and a current Code Status, Advanced Directive of Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNR). Resident #58's Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST), signed by the physician [DATE], documented Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR). Resident #58's Iowa Physician Orders for Scope of Treatment (IPOST), signed by the physician [DATE], documented DNR. Resident #58's Order Summary Report dated [DATE], documented a physician's order for DNR with order date [DATE]. Interview on [DATE] at 1:25 PM, Staff G, Registered Nurse stated all full code residents are listed on a sheet at the nurse's station, charts are…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident record review, staff interview, and facility policy review the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to include a resident's diagnoses and treatment for urinary tract infection two times since admission and history of within 30 days of admission for 1 resident (Resident #16) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) for Resident #16, dated 10/31/24, included diagnosis Non-Alzheimer's Dementia and Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (in the last 30 days). The MDS documented the resident was frequently incontinent of urine. Resident #16's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for 11/24 - 11/30/24 documented a physician's order started 11/27/24 for Macrobid (urinary anti-infective medication) two times a day for a UTI. Resident #16's Order Summary Report dated 1/22/25, documented a physician's order dated 1/14/25 for Cefurixine (antibiotic medication) two times a day for UTI for 10 days. Resident #16's Care Plan lacked inclusion of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate accounting of Scheduled 2 (II) (high potential for abuse) controlled medications for 1 of 3 residents reviewed. On 1/3/25, staff reported that Resident #44 was missing a dose of Ativan. The facility reported a census of 76 residents. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], Resident #44 was rarely understood so he was unable to complete Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment. Resident #44 required substantial assistance with toileting, showering and dressing, and supervision only with chair to bed transfers and walking. The resident had disorganized thinking, hallucinations, delusions, and daily physical symptoms directed toward others such as hitting, grabbing and pushing. The Care Plan for Resident #44 showed that the resident had episodes of behaviors such as combativeness, name calling and occasional refusal of medication/care resist cares. Staff were directed to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observations, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide dignity by leaving a catheter bag uncovered and easily visible in the dayroom and in the bedroom to 1 of 1 resident reviewed with catheters (Resident #32). The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings Include: 1. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident #32 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 5 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS documented a diagnosis of fluid overload, urinary retention, overactive bladder, and urinary incontinence. Observation on 1/23/24 at 10:19 AM, revealed Resident #32 sitting in a recliner in the dayroom with a catheter bag hanging on the right side of the recliner without a privacy bag in place. Observation on 1/23/24 at 2:41 PM, revealed Resident #32 lying in bed with a catheter bag hanging from the frame of the bed on the right side without a privacy bag in place, visible from the hallway On 1/23/24 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, family and staff interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide family with requested medical records in a timely manner for 1 of 1 resident reviewed (Resident #123). The facility reported a census of 74 residents. Findings Include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #123 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 (severe cognitive deficit.) The resident had daily behavioral symptoms such as hitting, pacing and rummaging. Resident #123 required partial assistance with eating, was dependent with toileting, required substantial assistance to transfer from sit to stand. His diagnosis included renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's Disease, Dementia and anxiety disorder. The Care Plan updated on 10/9/23 showed that Resident #123 admitted to Hospice level of care and staff directed to administer medication and treatments as ordered and monitor for side effect and effectiveness. He had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, observation, staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow Physicians Orders for special dietary needs for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (Resident #62). Resident #62 served a regular texture meal when the order was for pureed texture. The facility reported a census of 74 residents Findings Include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], Resident #62 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 (severe cognitive deficit). The resident identified severely impaired, never/rarely made decisions and was totally dependent on staff for help with meals. The Care Plan dated 2/9/23, showed that Resident #62 at risk for fluid imbalance related to being dependent on staff to provide and prompt her to consume adequate fluids. She had self-care deficits and required assistance with activities of daily living. The resident was unable to effectively communicate her basic needs. In an observation on 1/23/24 at 7:51 AM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$12,038 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $12,038 — penalty dated 2024-01-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

What families pay in IA